A Search for the K0L → μe and K0L → ee decays

A Search for the K0L → μe and K0L → ee decays

731c Nuclear Physics A527 (1991) 73 10734~ North-Holland, Amsterdam A Search for the ICf + pe and It’: --t ee Decays* S.S.Yamamoto Department of P...

236KB Sizes 9 Downloads 112 Views

731c

Nuclear Physics A527 (1991) 73 10734~ North-Holland, Amsterdam

A Search for the ICf + pe and It’: --t ee Decays*

S.S.Yamamoto Department

of Physics,

University

of Tokyo, Bunkyoku,

Tokyo 113, Japan of the Kg --+pp decay

A search for the Kg + tie and I<: + ee decays and a measurement rate were made at the KEK 12 GeV proton - July 1989 (4000 hours of running and December

1989 - May 1990 (1600 hours of running

2.0-2.5~10~~

ppp).

first running

period.

be considered The data

The results

presented

and represent

magnets

an electromagnetic

system,

trigger conditions

identification

resolution

plot between

ing the number

tification

of ?rr events,

assuming

events

is seen above the background

Candidates

by appropriate tracks

and their

angle, B , the angle

were calculated.

and the 0’ resolution

Fig. I shows

of 1000 events.

The mass

around 0.9(mrad)2. was chosen:

From

493MeV/c’

<

8’ < 3(mrad)‘. N,,

, for normalization

purpose

was obtained

to 3.63~10’

from the effective

were pions.

for which a 0’ cut at 3(mrad)* distribution.

by count-

including

the

mass distribution

of

trigger for the 1rx decay mode without that the particles

~TXevents as well as those coming from the most predominant effective mass distribution,

a gas Cerenkov

selected

mass and collinearity

It could also be obtained

by the hodoscope

information,

the

Details of the detector

are given by Inagaki et al.’

of events in the fiducial region, which amounted

factor of 500.

events obtained

and two hodoscopes,

fiducial region for acceptable and

during

of

arm spectrometer

from the two reconstructed

their effective

to be 1.3MeV/c2

effective mass < 502~eV/cz

intensity

the results should

of a double

decays were simultaneously

information

1987 ppp)

best results.

the nl effective mass and o2 for a subsample

was determined

The total number

procedure,

and the vector sum of their momenta,

these values the following

prescaling

with an average proton

consisting

and track reconstruction

info~ation,

between the 1<: direction

our present system

and five drift chambers,

Using the kinematical

December

of 1.0-1.5~10’~

shower counter and muon range counter.

for 1Ci -+ he , ee , pp and 1Cz --+ x+x-

a scatter

intensity

here are based on the data obtained

were taken with a detector

counter,

particle

over two periods:

Since we are still fine tuning the analysis

as preliminary

with two bending

triggers.

synchrotron

with an average proton

any particle

iden-

These events include genuine 111s decays.

has been made.

Dots with error bars represent

Fig. 2 shows such A clear 1ii peak the distribution

“KEK E-137, A KEK - Univ. of Tokyo - Kyoto Univ. - Tohoku Univ. ~olIaboration ( TInagaki, M.Kobayashi, T.Sato, TShinkawa, FSuekane K.Takamatsu, Y.Yoshimura, R.Fukuhisa, T.Kishida, T.K.Komatsubara, M.Kuze, FSai, J.Toyoura, S.S.Yamamoto, Y.Hemmi and T.Akagi ) 0375-9474/91/$03.50 0 1991 - Elscvier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland)

of

73%

SS. Yantamoto / I$-

FIGURE 1 Effective mass vs fP scatter plot for I<$ -+ 7r+7r- events

pe and I$-

ee decays

FIGURE 2 TK effective mass distribution of events obtained by the ?tx hodoscope trigger only

the Xrs events generated by a Monte Carlo simulation, normalized to the numbers of events outside the Kg peak. The agreement between the data and the simulation is quite good. Mx?robtained by subtracting the background from this distribution agreed with that obtained by straight counting to within about 2%. From the numbers of the generated Iii -+ xev and Kg 4 ~JN events, N,, and the Ki --P X*K obtained: BR(KE -+ nev)=37%

and BR(Ki

decay rate the foliowing branching ratios were -+ np~)=27%,

which are in good agreement

with the world average values of 38.6% and 27% s, Indicating ’ the imernal consistency of our data. Figs. 3(a), (bf and (c) show ef?ective mass vs @ scatter plots for the pe , ee and y~_ldecay modes.

The fiducial region is superposed in each figure. There are no events in the fiducial

region in the pe and ee plots and 114 events in the top plot. Fig. 3(d) is a projection of the ~JLplot on the effective mass axis with 62 < 3jmrad)‘.

A peak is clearly seen at the Kg mass.

In order to obtain the upper limits on the Fe and ce decay rates as well as the pp decay rate from the data the particle identi6cation efficiencies were measured by using bptons and pions from ICs events. The average efficiencies are : Epe= 0.66f0.02,

E,, = 0.52f0.02 and E,,= 0.80 3~0.03. The relative acceptances with respect to the Kg -+ r+z- decay were calculated by a Monte Carlo simulation. They are: A-,/A,= = 1.00 i 0.02, A,,/&, = 1.00 f 0.02 and A~~JA~~ = 1.08 i: 0.02. Furthermore, the loss of pions due to nuclear ir~t~ractions in the upstream hodoscope and Cerenkov counter were measured by using the 7rf’s from Ibis events. The momentum corrected percentage loss is 5.0 i 0.2 %. Using these values, N nn and the h’i

-+ ?T+K- decay rate we have obtained the 90%

confidence level upper limits for the Kg -+ ,ue and ee decays with a systematic error of about 6% as follows: BR(Ki

+ pe) < 1.9 x 10-r” and BR(@

Kg ---) ~iy decay rate was measured to be BR(

-+ ee) < 2.5

x

10-lo. The

I<:--+ p;ttf=( 8.2f0.8fstat) i 0.7(sys) )x10-‘.

S.S. Yamamoto / KL-

pe and KL-

ee decays

133c

I

,

8-

I

(b)

-

-60

-

L “0

.

. 2-.

0 480

i

I

I

490

500

510

160f

I

M,, ( MeVicz

,

)

FIGURE 3 Scatter plot of the effective mass vs o2 for the (a) pe and (b) ee events (c) scatter plot of the effective mass vs B* for the pp events and (d) the pp effective mass distribution of the ptp events with 0’ < 3(mrad)’ This pp decay rate is to be compared with the value ( 5.8 rt O.G(stat) i 0.4(sys) )x10-’

based

on 87 pp events obtained by Mathiazhagan et al.3 These two t~izdecay rates barely agree with each other and are consistent with the unitarity lower limit of ( 6.83 i 0.25 ) x10-s based on a formula by Sehgal ’ within the uncertainties. REFERENCES 1. T.fnagaki et al., Phys. Rev. D40, 1712 (1989). 2. Particle Data Group, G.P.Yost et al., Phys. Lett. B204 (1988). 3. C.Mathiazhagan et al., Whys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2185 (1989). 4. L.M.Sehgal, Phys. Rev. 183, 1511 (1969).