A Simple Device for Transporting Small Pathologic Specimens

A Simple Device for Transporting Small Pathologic Specimens

692 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY than one occasion, increasing their expo­ sure. In one study, the incidence of acute leukemia in patients with...

246KB Sizes 0 Downloads 48 Views

692

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY

than one occasion, increasing their expo­ sure. In one study, the incidence of acute leukemia in patients with polycythemia vera treated with 3 2 P was 11%, whereas the incidence of acute leukemia in the nonradiation treated group was less than 1%. The increased incidence of acute leukemia after 3 2 P appeared to be dose dependent. 2 Information can be obtained concerning acute changes of hématologie factors and later development of acute leukemia in eye patients with and without 32 P uptake testing. I should be happy to learn the results of a search for these systemic changes. D O U G L A S E. G A A S T E R L A N D ,

Bethesda,

M.D.

Maryland

REFERENCES 1. Radiation Protection, ICRP publication 17, Protection of the Patient in Radionuclide Investiga­ tions. A report prepared for the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Oxford, Pergamon Press, adopted, September, 1969, ppr. 6465. 2. Modan, B., and Lilienfeld, A. M.: Polycythe­ mia vera and leukemia—the role of radiation treat­ ment. Medicine 44:305, 1965.

A Simple Device for Transporting Small Pathologic Specimens Editor: Recently we devised a leak-proof con­ tainer for transporting small tissue speci­ mens from the office to the pathology laboratory. A bottle that previously con­ tained a soft contact lens is cleansed of its original saline solution, a small amount of formalin is placed in the glass container, and the specimen is placed in the solu­ tion. The reapplied rubber cap and metal sealer secure the specimen and liquid in a leak-proof container. Using a Styrofoam mailing case further protects the contain­ er. Since many ophthalmologists fit soft contact lenses or have them available there is a constant supply of used contain­ ers available for transport. We have had

MAY, 1976

no untoward experience by using this technique. A R T H U R A. G O L D ,

M.D.

W I L L I A M H. BOOCKVAR, Ms.

M.D.

BUNNY SCHNEIDER

Hewlett, New York Spelling of Ophthalmology by Nonophthalmic Physicians Editor: Our fellow physicians and the lay pub­ lic are indefatigable in creating new spellings of ophthalmology. Ophthalmol­ ogy with 13 letters is the third longest single word describing a major specialty within medicine and surgery, following anesthesiology and otolaryngology. The misspelling of ophthalmology is a com­ mon annoyance to the eye physician. I undertook a study to determine the fre­ quency of misspelling of ophthalmology by nonophthalmic physicians. A tabulation form was sent to 40 uni­ versity and public hospitals having oph­ thalmology residencies. Residents seeing patients in consultation recorded 20 con­ secutive spellings of ophthalmology on consultation requests filled out by physi­ cians. Veterans administration hospitals were not included because in many of these consult requests are filled out by clerks. Spellings that were illegible, abTABLE SPELLINGS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY

No.

%

Opthalmology Opthamology Ophthamology Opthomology Ophthomology Optholmology Other spellings Total

43 22 12 5 3 3 9 97

26.4 13.5 7.4 3.1 1.8 1.8 5.5 59.5

Ophthalmology

66

40.5