A soft material for chromium speciation in water samples using a chemiluminescence automatic system

A soft material for chromium speciation in water samples using a chemiluminescence automatic system

Accepted Manuscript A soft material for chromium speciation in water samples using a chemiluminescence automatic system Cintia J. Fernandez, Claudia E...

7MB Sizes 0 Downloads 45 Views

Accepted Manuscript A soft material for chromium speciation in water samples using a chemiluminescence automatic system Cintia J. Fernandez, Claudia E. Domini, Marcos Grünhut, Adriana G. Lista PII:

S0045-6535(17)32156-2

DOI:

10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.178

Reference:

CHEM 20559

To appear in:

ECSN

Please cite this article as: Fernandez, C.J., Domini, C.E., Grünhut, M., Lista, A.G., A soft material for chromium speciation in water samples using a chemiluminescence automatic system, Chemosphere (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.178. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Highlights A sorbent based on MWCNTs and ionic liquid was used for the speciation of chromium

RI PT

The speciation and detection of chromium was performed by using an automatic system Cr(III) and Cr(VI) were detected by chemiluminescence reactions

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

Cr(VI) was determined by the oxidation of luminol with the Cr2O7= desorbed

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

A soft material for chromium speciation in water samples using a

2

chemiluminescence automatic system

3

Cintia J. Fernandez, Claudia E. Domini, Marcos Grünhut, Adriana G. Lista*

5

INQUISUR, Departamento de Química, Universidad Nacional del Sur

6

(UNS)-CONICET, Av. Alem 1253, B8000CPB, Bahía Blanca, Argentina

RI PT

4

7

Running title: A soft material for chromium speciation in an automatic system

SC

8

M AN U

9

Correspondence:

11

Prof. Adriana G. Lista

12

Departamento de Química, Universidad Nacional del Sur

13

Av. Alem 1253, B8000CPB, Bahía Blanca, Argentina

14

Fax: +54 0291 4595160

15

E-mail address: [email protected]

TE D

10

EP

16

Abbreviations: BmimCl: 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium-chloride; C: channel;

18

CNT: carbon nanotubes; EA: electronic actuator; FBA: Flow-batch analysis; IL:

19

Ionic liquids; MDC: mixing detection chamber; MFS: multicommutated flow

20

system; MWCNT: Multiwalled carbon nanotubes; V: solenoid valve; PP:

21

peristaltic pump.

AC C

17

22 23

Keywords: Automatic system, Chromium speciation, Ionic liquids, Multiwalled

24

carbon nanotubes, Chemiluminescence detection

25 1

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract

27

A soft material formed by multiwall carbon nanotubes and 1-butyl-3-methyl

28

imidazolium chloride was used as sorbent material to perform the chromium

29

speciation in natural waters. This soft material was not yet used for the

30

speciation of metals as chromium. Thus, a multicommutated flow system

31

containing a minicolumn packed with the soft material was designed. The

32

procedure was based on the capacity of the sorbent to retain Cr(VI) as Cr2O7=

33

and allow to pass Cr(III) through the column. Then, a fully automated flow-batch

34

analysis

35

chemiluminescence detection. Thus, Cr(III) was determined as catalyst of the

36

luminol and hydrogen peroxide reaction and Cr(VI) as oxidant of luminol

37

reaction. This represents a new approach because the oxidation of luminol

38

using Cr2O7= has not been reported in literature. The variables of the two

39

systems were optimized. The limits of detection were 1.4 µg L-1 for Cr(VI) and

40

4.0 µg L-1 for Cr(III). The precision of the method was 3.8% and 7.0% for Cr(VI)

41

and Cr(III), respectively. The present method was applied to real water samples

42

with recoveries between 95% and 107%. Besides, these results were in

43

accordance with those obtained using inductive coupled plasma-optical

44

emission spectrometry technique.

46

developed

to

SC

was

quantify

both

species

using

EP

TE D

M AN U

system

AC C

45

RI PT

26

47 48 49 50 2

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. Introduction

52

Chromium speciation is always important because of the bioavailability and

53

toxicity of some of its chemical forms. Even though there are many oxidation

54

states of chromium, the most commonly found are Cr(III) and Cr(VI), especially

55

as environment pollutants. While Cr(III) is considered an essential trace element

56

for preservation of glucose, lipids and protein metabolism (Shah et al., 2012),

57

Cr(VI) is irritant and toxic to human body tissue due to its water solubility and its

58

oxidizing potential. It has been demonstrated that inorganic species of Cr(VI)

59

are carcinogenic (Saçmaci et al., 2012). For these reasons, the determination of

60

the different species of chromium presents greater interest than the

61

determination of total chromium. There are several methods to carry out the

62

speciation of chromium in environmental samples applying different techniques.

63

In most of them, the direct determination of Cr(VI) is proposed and Cr(III) is

64

determined after its oxidation to Cr(VI) (Tuzen., Soylak., 2007). Ren et al.

65

present the determination of Cr(III) by electrothermal atomic spectrometry with

66

the reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) (Ren et al., 2007). On the other hand,

67

separative techniques as ion chromatography, capillary electrophoresis and LC-

68

ICP-MS also have been used (Séby et al., 2003, Lin et al., 2016) but all these

69

methods need a pretreatment step to remove the analytes.

70

environmental pollutants such as heavy metal and organic compounds have

71

been extracted using solid phase extraction with different sorbent materials.

72

These materials, like activated carbon (Feist et al., 2014), resins (Tokalioğlu et

73

al., 2017) carbon nanofibers (Mubarak et al., 2017), and carbon nanotubes

74

(CNTs) (Tarigh et al., 2013; Thines et al., 2017; Mubarak et al., 2015) have an

75

outstanding role in the enrichment efficiency of the analytes. It is well known the

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

51

Usually,

3

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT excellent properties of carbon nanotubes as sorbent material but one of the

77

major disadvantages is their tendency to form aggregates. For this reason,

78

different alternatives were proposed to disperse the nanotubes using different

79

solvents such as surfactants, organic solvents and ionic liquids (ILs) (Lu et al.,

80

2012). In recent years, ILs have been combined with sorbent materials to

81

improve the efficiency and selectivity of the extraction procedure (Tokalıoğlu et

82

al., 2016). The role of ILs is to enhance the dispersion of CNTs, creating in this

83

way a new kind of sorbent material called soft material. This material was used

84

to extract and preconcentrate organic analytes (Polo-Luque et al., 2013). Until

85

now, to the best of our knowledge, there are not reports in which this soft

86

material was applied to evaluate chromium speciation. Only a few works report

87

this speciation in a previous step to the determination of analytes. One of these

88

uses nanostructured α-alumina (Monasterio et al., 2009) and another uses

89

MWCNTs for the adsorption of Cr(VI)-ammonium pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate

90

chelate (Tuzen., Soylak., 2007). On the other hand, up to now, the use of

91

chemiluminescence technique for determining both species of chromium has

92

not been reported. Seitz et al. described the determination of Cr(III) by

93

chimiluminescence

94

reaction

95

chemiluminescence technique are high selectivity and specificity. Moreover, it

96

presents a high compatibility and easy coupling to automatic systems. The

97

automatic systems based on multicommutation and flow-batch analysis are

98

interesting alternatives to make feasible a method or to transform batch

99

processes into automated processes. Both MFS and FBA systems may perform

100

different steps in the analytical procedure, such as separation and/or

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

76

(Seitz

et

analysis using the analyte as catalyst of the luminol al.,

1972).

Some

of

the

advantages

of

using

4

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT preconcentration of analytes and determination that may include the coupling to

102

conventional analytical instruments. Conformation and advantages of FBA

103

systems have been described in literature (Diniz et al., 2012). Particularly, the

104

complete programmability of the process (including, control of sampling, flow

105

rates, filling of mixing chamber, detection and evacuation) and the possibility to

106

perform the measurements of the analytical signal directly inside the mixing

107

chamber can be highlighted. Both are important facts for the automation of

108

methods where chemiluminescence detection is used (Grünhut et al., 2011).

109

In this work, a new analytical method to determine Cr(VI) and Cr(III) in water

110

samples was developed. For this purpose, a MFS to perform the speciation of

111

chromium, which included a minicolumn packed with a soft material, was

112

designed. The soft material, composed of MWCNTs and IL, improved the

113

absorption of Cr(VI) as Cr2O7= in comparison to MCNTs, due to the synergic

114

effect between them. Additionally, this soft material allowed the separation of

115

both chromium species. Then, a FBA system with chemiluminescence detection

116

was developed to carry out the quantitation of Cr(VI), as oxidant of luminol, and

117

Cr(III) as catalyst in the reaction of the luminol and hydrogen peroxide, both in a

118

basic medium. According to our knowledge, this is the first time that the

119

chemiluminescence technique is used to determine both analytes, particularly

120

using the same automatic system.

122

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

121

RI PT

101

2. Materials and Methods

123 124

2.1 Reagents and Solutions

5

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT All solutions were prepared by using analytical-grade reagents and ultra-pure

126

water (18MΩ cm-1) from a Milli-Q System (Millipore, USA). A 0.2 mol L-1

127

potassium chloride (Merck) solution was mixed with a 0.2 mol L-1 sodium

128

hydroxide (Merck) solution in order to obtain a buffer solution of pH 12.00. A

129

0.01 mol L-1 luminol stock solution was prepared by dissolving 0.1770 g of

130

luminol (Sigma-Aldrich) with 100 mL of the buffer solution. This solution was

131

stored in a dark bottle at 4°C and it was stable fo r one week. The luminol

132

working solution (5x10-3 mol L-1) was daily prepared by appropriate dilution of

133

stock solution in buffer solution. Hydrogen peroxide solution was prepared by

134

diluting of 100 v/v H2O2 solution to obtain a 0.01 mol L-1 work solution. A 5x10-3

135

mol L-1 EDTA solution was prepared by diluting of 0.1 mol L-1 stock solution

136

(Merck Titrisol). Stock solutions of Cr(III) and Cr(VI), both of 100 mg L-1, were

137

prepared by dissolving Cr(NO3)3.9H2O (Mallinckrodt) and K2Cr2O7 (Sigma-

138

Aldrich) in water, respectively. These solutions were acidified with nitric acid.

139

Standard solutions of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) were freshly prepared by dilution of the

140

stock solutions. MWCNTs with external diameters of 40-60 nm and purity >95%

141

(Bayer) and a 0.5 mol L-1 BmimCl (Merck) solution were used to perform the

142

speciation of chromium.

143

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

125

144

2.2 Instrumentation and Software

145

An

146

photomultiplier operated at 900 V was used. The emission of photons was

147

registered at 425 nm. A Gilson® Minipuls 3 and an Ismatec® peristaltic pumps

148

and Tygon® tubes were used to pump the fluids. The rest of the tubing was

149

made of Teflon® (0.5 mm i.d.). NResearch® three-way solenoid valves were

Aminco Bowman®

Series

2

luminescence

spectrometer

with

the

6

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT used to handle all solutions into the systems. The MDC was constructed with

151

Teflon® and was designed in our laboratory in order to prepare solutions and

152

perform the detection in the same place. A lab-made stirrer system was

153

designed to improve the mixing inside the MDC. An EA connected to a

154

Pentium® 4 microcomputer was used to control all the components of the

155

systems. The software used for controlling both, MFS and FBA systems, was

156

developed in Labview® 5.1 visual programming language. A model 710 A

157

Orion® pHmeter with an Orion-Ross® model 81-02 electrode was used to

158

perform the pH measurements.

159

The composition of the soft material was examined by X-Ray Energy Dispersive

160

Microanalysis (EDS) (X-Max50, Oxford). The physical structure and morphology

161

of the soft material, before and after the sorption of Cr(VI), were analyzed by the

162

Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) (Leo, 40 XVP, England). In both cases,

163

the sample preparation was carried out metallizing it with gold in a Sputter

164

Coater (Pelco 91000).

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

165

RI PT

150

2.3 Chromium Speciation Procedure

167

A soft material based on the combination of BmimCl and MWCNTs was

168

prepared to perform the speciation of chromium. A MFS that included a

169

minicolumn packed with this material was developed (Fig. 1). The soft material

170

was prepared weighing 0.1 g of MWCNTs and adding 0.5 mL of BmimCl. This

171

mixture was homogenized in a mortar and it was kept at 4º C for 24 h. Then, a

172

Tygon® tube (length: 30 mm; inner diameter: 4mm) was used to pack this

173

material. The MFS consisted of two three-way solenoid valves (V1 and V2) and

174

only one channel (C1) where the minicolumn was inserted. As it can be seen in

AC C

166

7

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Fig. 1, different steps were performed in the MFS. When V1 and V2 valves were

176

OFF, the soft material was conditioned passing 1 min of water and 2.5 min of

177

0.05 mol L-1 of BmimCl solution through it. Then, 5.0 mL of standard/sample

178

solution was loaded and a vial 1 was placed at the end of the channel. At this

179

time, the Cr(III) contained in the standard/sample passed through the column

180

and it was collected in the vial 1, while the Cr(VI) was retained on the soft

181

material. After this, the vial 1 was replaced by a waste vial and the column was

182

washed with 1min of water and then 1 min of air was passed through it to

183

remove the water. All these steps were performed at 0.85 mL min-1. Finally, the

184

elution step was performed at 1 mL min-1 by turning ON V1 and V2 valves and in

185

reversal flow mode. In this way, 300 µL of BmimCl alkaline solution with NaCl

186

passed through the column. When the volume of eluent was all inside the

187

column, the flow was stopped for 10 min. Then, the flow was restored to collect

188

the amount of Cr(VI) in vial 2, at the end of the channel.

SC

M AN U

TE D

189

RI PT

175

2.4 FBA system with chemiluminescence detection

191

A schematic diagram of the proposed FBA system is showed in Fig 2a. The

192

system consisted of five channels, through which luminol (C2), sample (C3),

193

hydrogen peroxide (C4), water (C5) and waste (C6) flowed. The direction of the

194

flow in the C2 to C5 channels was controlled by three-way solenoid valves. Then,

195

when the valves (V3 to V6) were OFF, the solutions were recycled to the

196

respective flasks. When the valves were ON, the respective solutions were

197

pumped to the MDC. As it can be seen in Fig. 2b, the lab-made MDC has been

198

designed with four inlets for incoming solutions and one output for emptying. It

199

was equipped with a quartz window, which was located at the bottom part of the

AC C

EP

190

8

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT chamber in order to minimize the final volume of the reaction mixture (1.50 mL).

201

In this way, the MDC was used to perform both the chemical reaction and the

202

chemiluminescence detection. In addition, a little magnetic stirring system was

203

constructed using a cooler fan motor obtained from an Intel® microprocessor

204

and placed below the MDC (Fig. 2b). The MDC coupled to the stirring system

205

was placed in the spectrofluorimeter by means of a lab-made cell holder (Fig.

206

2c). On the other hand, the fifth channel (C6) was used for emptying the MDC

207

by means of an auxiliary peristaltic pump (PPA) Thereby, when the

208

chemiluminescence reaction finished, the solution in the MDC was pumped to

209

the waste.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

200

210

2.5 FBA procedure

212

As an initial step, the flow rate for each channel was studied in order to

213

establish the time of activation of each solenoid valve. These times

214

corresponded to the precise volumes of solution that were introduced into the

215

MDC. For this purpose, each channel was filled with bidestilated water and the

216

water was collected and weighed in an analytical balance by activating the

217

peristaltic pump for 30 s. The corresponding volume was calculated by means

218

of the density data taking into account the experimental conditions (25 ºC and 1

219

atm). Finally, the flow rates obtained for each channel were 2.30, 2.60, 2.65,

220

2.30 and 2.28 mL min−1 for luminol (C2), sample (C3), hydrogen peroxide (C4),

221

water (C5) and waste (C6), respectively. Before starting the procedure, the

222

valves were set in a way that all solutions in their respective channels were

223

recycled toward their flasks (OFF position). Then, V3, V4, V5 and V6 valves were

224

switched ON for 10 s and the solutions were pumped toward the MDC in order

AC C

EP

TE D

211

9

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT to fill the channels between the valves and the MDC. Immediately, the PPA was

226

switched ON and the excess of the solutions contained in the MDC

227

wasaspirated to the waste for 20 s. This operation consumed a total time of 30

228

s. Then, the system was ready to perform the preparation of the calibration for

229

Cr(III) and Cr(VI) and the sample analysis. In the case of Cr(III) determination,

230

the analysis of standard solutions and the samples was performed by

231

sequentially switching ON valves V3, V4 and V5 during previously defined

232

intervals of time (26, 7 and 7 s, respectively). Thus, 1.00 mL of luminol, 0.30 mL

233

of Cr (III) and 0.20 mL of hydrogen peroxide were pumped toward the MDC. For

234

Cr (VI) determination, the analysis of standard solutions and the samples was

235

performed by sequentially switching ON valves V3 and V4 during previously

236

defined intervals of time (31 and 7 s, respectively). In this way, 1.20 mL of

237

luminol and 0.30 mL of Cr (VI) were pumped toward the MDC. In both cases,

238

the corresponding chemiluminescence signal at 425 nm was immediately

239

measured as peak height. When the register of the signal was finished, the

240

solution was aspirated and thrown into the waste by switching ON the PPA for

241

45 s. The magnetic stirring was ON during all the analysis. This procedure was

242

repeated for each Cr (III) and Cr (VI) standard solution and each sample. On

243

the other hand, the system was always cleaned between measurements. The

244

MDC cleaning procedure was carried out by switching ON V6 valve and the

245

magnetic stirring for 40 s. The total emptying of the MDC was assured by

246

switching ON the PPA for 45 s.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

225

247 248 249

3. Results and discussion 10

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3.1 Characterization of the soft material before and after adsorption of

251

Cr(VI)

252

The results obtained by EDS (Fig. 3) showed that the soft material was free

253

from impurities. The five areas marked in figure 3a showed the same results, as

254

it was expected. In the analysis the only elements found were the

255

corresponding ones to the composition of the soft material: carbon, oxygen,

256

nitrogen and chloride as it can be seen in Fig. 3b. (corresponding to the

257

analysis of area 3 in figure 3a). On the other hand, Fig. 4 shows the physical

258

structure and morphology of the soft material before and after adsorption of

259

Cr(VI) obtained by SEM. Smooth MWCNTs were observed forming an

260

intertwined pattern, probably due to its combination with the ionic liquid (Fig. 4

261

a). Besides, the morphology of the soft material shows that the MWCNTs have

262

uniform diameters between 35 and 45 nm, which demonstrate that the soft

263

material is homogeneous. In general, the tubes became wider, especially at the

264

ends, after the adsorption process (Fig. 4 b), showing slightly bigger diameters

265

between 47 and 52 nm. Also, the surface of the tubes was not as smooth

266

(Mubarak et al., 2016) and looked more compact, probably due to the

267

incorporation of chromium into the material.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

268

RI PT

250

269

3.2 Optimization of speciation variables

270

In this work, a soft material was prepared to perform the speciation of

271

chromium. A combination of BmimCl and MWCNTs was used instead of

272

MWCNTs, because the soft material presented more efficiency to adsorb Cr(VI)

273

as Cr2O7= , while Cr(III) passed through the column. This fact is based on the

274

synergic effect between the IL and the CNTs. It has been demonstrated that in 11

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT a soft material, CNTs are surrounded by ILs, taking into account that the atoms

276

of the alkyl groups are nearer to CNTs surface than the nitrogen and carbon

277

atoms of imidazolium rings (Wang et al, 2008). A physisorption phenomenon is

278

produced, where electrostatic interactions and Van del Waals forces take place

279

on the MWCNTs surface and charged ion clusters are surrounding this surface

280

(Martinis et al., 2017). In this way, the anion of IL (Cl-) is interchanged with

281

Cr2O7= and the analyte is retained on the soft material, while Cr(III) passes

282

through the column. This mechanism is showed in Fig. 5. In order to validate

283

this selectivity of the soft material, the typical spectrophotometric reaction for

284

Cr(VI) with 1,5-diphenylcarbazide was used (Bose, 1954). Cr(VI) was

285

determined after its elution and Cr(III) was determined after oxidation with

286

hydrogen peroxide (Andersen, 1998). The obtained results demonstrated that

287

Cr(III) was not retained on the soft material.

288

As mentioned before, the separation process was carried out in the minicolumn

289

inserted in a channel of the MFS, packed with the soft material. So, it was

290

necessary to optimize all variables of the MFS. Table 1 shows the range of all

291

these variables and their optimum values. On the other hand, the direction of

292

elution and type of eluent were also optimized. For these purposes, three

293

solutions were tested: IL, alkaline IL and alkaline IL with NaCl. The pH of

294

alkaline IL solution was varied between 8.00 and 12.00 and the best recoveries

295

were obtained at pH 11.00. At this pH, the predominant specie of Cr(VI) is

296

CrO4=. So it was necessary to add a drop of concentrated nitric acid to the

297

eluate, in order to obtain Cr2O7= and then get it into the FBA system. Then, to

298

enhance the recovery values, 0.01 g mL-1 of NaCl was added to test the salting

299

out effect and effectively, the recoveries were better. Taking into account the

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

275

12

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT contact time of the eluent with the analyte, it was supposed that the best results

301

would be obtained with low flow rates for the elution. However, the best

302

chemiluminescence signals were obtained when higher flow rates were used

303

and a stop flow step was included. The results were improved when the elution

304

was performed in a reverse mode regarding the sample load direction. This

305

elution mode avoids the tight packing of the sorbent and decreases the

306

dispersion of the concentrate during the elution. Thus, the selected optimum

307

values are showed in Table 1.

308

Moreover, the soft material needed a conditioning step. For this purpose, a 0.05

309

mol L-1 BmimCl solution, with and without NaOH, was passed through the

310

column during different times (1 min to 3 min). The IL solution without NaOH

311

(pH = 5.00) flowing for 2.5 min gave the best results in terms of recovery values

312

for Cr(VI). Besides, two different lengths of the column were tested (15 and 30

313

mm) and the best results, based on the best chemiluminescence signals, were

314

obtained with the longer column.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

315

RI PT

300

3.3 Optimization of the chemiluminescence reactions and the FBA system

317

The luminol in presence of an oxidant and in alkaline medium produces a

318

chemiluminescence signal at 425 nm. So, using Cr2O7= as oxidant it was

319

possible to determine Cr(VI). According to the literature, this is the first time that

320

Cr(VI) is determined by chemiluminescence, using the analyte as oxidant for the

321

luminol reaction. Usually, Cr(VI) is reduced to Cr(III) and is determined as

322

catalyst of the luminol reaction. On the other hand, taking into account that the

323

chemiluminescence reaction of luminol can be catalyzed by different metals, the

324

determination of Cr(III) was performed using hydrogen peroxide as oxidant and

AC C

316

13

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Cr(III) as catalyst. The concentration of all chemical reagents involved in both

326

reactions and the reaction media should be optimized. The luminol

327

concentration was studied between 1 x 10-4 mol L-1 and 1 x 10-2 mol L-1 and the

328

optimum value was 5 x 10-3 mol L-1 for both analytes. The studied pH range was

329

10.00-13.00. Again, the optimum value (12.00) was the same for the two

330

analytes. These facts represented an advantage in the determination of both

331

analytes. The other optimized variables were only for the determination of Cr(III)

332

and they were: H2O2 concentration (studied range: 1 x 10-4 mol L-1 and 3 x 10-2

333

mol L-1, optimum value: 1 x 10-2 mol L-1), EDTA concentration (studied range:1 x

334

10-3 mol L-1 and 1 x 10-2 mol L-1, optimum value: 5 x 10-3 mol L-1). Also, the

335

variables related to the FBA system were optimized in order to obtain the best

336

signal. FBA variables such as order and volumes of the reagents added into the

337

MDC and stirring time were optimized based on the higher chemiluminescence

338

signal and the repeatability of the measurements obtained for both Cr(III) and

339

Cr(VI) determinations. As regards to the order of the reagents added into the

340

MDC, three different combinations were tested: luminol and oxidant, oxidant

341

and luminol, and luminol-oxidant simultaneously. The optimum order was

342

luminol and oxidant. On the other hand, the total volume of reaction was 1.50

343

mL, which included 1.00 mL of luminol, 0.20 mL of sample and 0.30 mL of

344

hydrogen peroxide for Cr(III) and 1.20 mL of luminol and 0.30 mL of sample for

345

Cr(VI).

346

corresponding oxidant (H2O2 for Cr (III) and Cr2O4= for Cr (VI)) was added so

347

fast as possible to the MDC (See section 2.5). Finally, the MDC coupled to the

348

stirring system was designed in order to obtain a rapid and efficient mixture of

349

the solutions. As the speed of stirring presented a significant effect in the

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

325

Optimal

chemiluminescence

signals

were

obtained

when

the

14

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT analytical signal, it was necessary to maintain a high and stable speed of

351

stirring (500 rpm) during the chemiluminescence reaction.

352

3.4 Analytical performance

353

The different analytical parameters were calculated using the optimized

354

proposed methods. The calibration curve for Cr(VI) was y = (59.396 ± 569) x +

355

(1968 ± 30), R2 = 0.9998, and for Cr(III) was y = (75.250 ± 3088) x – (1254 ±

356

162), R2 = 0.9960. In both cases, y: chemiluminescence signal and x: [µg L-1].

357

The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) for Cr(VI) were 1.4

358

µg L-1 and 38 µg L-1, respectively. For Cr(III) the LOD was 4 µg L-1 and the LOQ

359

was 12 µg L-1 (Miller and Miller; 2010). The precision of the method,

360

represented by repetitively (% RSD) was 7.0 and 3.8 for Cr(III) and Cr(VI)

361

respectively, calculated from eight independent measurements of a standard

362

solution containing 50 µg L-1 for both analytes.

363

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

350

3.4.1 Selectivity

365

The effect of common cations and anions present in water samples in the

366

determination of 0.08 mg L-1 of Cr(VI) and 0.07 mg L-1 of Cr(III) was examined

367

applying the whole method. Different cations present in water samples could

368

catalyze the luminol reaction instead of Cr(III), so a study of these interferences

369

was performed. The first step in this study was to compare the concentration of

370

a standard solution of Cr(III) (0.07 mg L-1) with the concentration corresponding

371

to the same standard solution containing the interference. 6.00 mg L-1 of Cu

372

(II), 0.06 mg L-1 of Fe(III), 6.00 mg L-1 of Zn(II), 14.00 mg L-1 of Ba(II), 10.00 mg

373

L-1 of Ca(II) and 10.00 mg L-1 of Mg(II) were tested. Only Fe(III) presented

374

interference. This fact was solved adding a 5 x 10-3 mol L-1 EDTA solution to the

AC C

EP

364

15

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT samples. In this case, it was important to check the formation of Cr(III)-EDTA

376

complex, because under this chemical form, there was not chemiluminescence

377

signal. The Cr(III)-EDTA complex is kinetically slow to form, and the other

378

cations form EDTA complex rapidly. Hamm (Hamm., 1953) studied the Cr (III)-

379

EDTA system and it was showed that the rate of complex formation was

380

independent of EDTA concentration and at a higher concentration of Cr(III) the

381

rate was proportional to this concentration. Besides, the rate of the formation of

382

the complex increased with increasing pH. Thus, a study taking into account

383

these considerations was performed. First of all, it is important to notice that in

384

this case, the Cr(III) concentration levels were low, and the samples were

385

acidified with a drop of 1 mol L-1 HNO3. Hence, the EDTA concentration was

386

tested between 1 x 10-2 and 1 x 10-3 mol L-1, working with the Cr(III) standard

387

solution. The best chemiluminescence signal was obtained with 5 x 10-3 mol L-1.

388

Then, the same standard solution containing different concentrations of Fe(III)

389

was prepared and the respective signals were measured. In this way, 6 mg L-1

390

of Fe(III) did not interfere. It is important to highlight that EDTA should be added

391

just prior to analysis, to avoid the possible formation of Cr(III)-EDTA complex

392

and to obtain a good reproducibility. Conversely, the anions present in the water

393

samples could be adsorbed on the soft material together with Cr(VI), so it was

394

necessary

395

concentrations of anions were added to a standard solution of Cr(VI) (0.08 mg

396

L-1). Thus, it was possible to demonstrate that the proposed method supported

397

4 mg L-1 of Cl- and NO3-, 3 mg L-1 of PO3= and 2.5 mg L-1 of SO4=. Due to the

398

analyzed samples usually contain higher concentration levels of SO4= than 2.5

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

375

to

test

these

possible

interferences.

Therefore,

different

16

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 399

mg L-1, this interference was solved by adding BaCl2 to the samples and filtering

400

them with a 0.45 µm nylon filter.

401

3.5 Analysis of real samples

403

The proposed method was applied to three different water samples. These real

404

samples showed that both chromium species were not present in them, so they

405

were spiked with the respective standard solutions. A recovery study was

406

carried out and the same spiked samples were analyzed by inductively coupled

407

plasma optical emission spectrometry, in order to validate the method. Table 2

408

shows the obtained results and the respective recoveries which agreed with

409

those recommended for water samples. On the other hand, the obtained results

410

applying inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry were in

411

accordance with those obtained with the proposed method.

SC

M AN U

TE D

412

RI PT

402

4. Concluding remarks

414

A new automatic FBA method with chemiluminescence detection was

415

developed to determine Cr(VI) and Cr(III). The speciation of both analytes was

416

performed by using a MFS which contained a minicolumn packed with a soft

417

material. One of the novelties of this work is the use of a soft material

418

composed by MWCNTs and IL that allows the separation of both chromium

419

species. Cr(VI) was retained on the soft material and Cr(III) passed through the

420

minicolumn. Besides, it is the first time that the chemiluminescence technique

421

was used to determine both species, Cr(VI) as oxidant of luminol reaction and

422

Cr(III) as catalyst of the luminol and hydrogen peroxide reaction using the same

AC C

EP

413

17

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT concentration of luminol and pH value. This was an additional advantage when

424

FBA systems were used.

425

The new method was applied to real water samples and the obtained results

426

presented good recoveries and were in agreement with those obtained with

427

inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry method.

RI PT

423

428

Acknowledgment

430

The authors acknowledge financial support of Universidad Nacional del Sur. C.

431

Fernández, C. Domini and M. Grünhut also acknowledge to CONICET (Consejo

432

Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas).

M AN U

SC

429

433

Conflict of interest

435

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

438 439 440 441 442 443

EP

437

AC C

436

TE D

434

444 445 446 447 18

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT References

449

Andersen, J.E.T. 1998. Introduction of hydrogen peroxide as an oxidant in flow

450

injection analysis: speciation of Cr(III) and Cr(VI). Anal. Chim. Acta. 361, 125-

451

131.

452

Bose, M., 1954.The reaction of chromate with diphenylcarbazide. Anal. Chim.

453

Acta. 10, 201-208.

454

Diniz, P.G.D., Almeida, L.F., Harding, D.P., Araújo, M.C.U. 2012. Flow-batch

455

analysis. Trends Anal. Chem. 35, 39-49.

456

Feist, B., Mikula, B., 2014. Preconcentration of heavy metals on activated

457

carbon and their determination in fruits by inductively coupled plasma optical

458

emission spectrometry. Food Chem.147, 302-306.

459

Grünhut, M., Martins, V.L., Centurión, M.E., Araújo, M.C.U., Fernández Band,

460

B.S., 2011. Flow-batch analyzer for the chemiluminescence determination of

461

catecholamines in pharmaceutical preparations. Anal. Lett. 44, 67-81.

462

Hamm,

463

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid complex with chromium (III). J. Amer. Chem.

464

Soc. 75, 5670-5672.

465

Lin, Y.A., Jiang, S.J., Sahayam, A.C., Huang, Y.L., 2016. Speciation of

466

chromium in edible animal oils after microwave extraction and liquid

467

chromatography inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Microchem.

468

J.128, 274-278.

469

Lu, F., Zhang, S., Zheng, L., 2012. Dispersion of multi-walled carbon nanotubes

470

(MWCNTs) by ionic liquid-based phosphonium surfactants in aqueous solution.

471

J. Mol. Liq.173, 42-46.

1953.

Complex

Ions

of

Chromium

VI.

The

AC C

EP

R.E.,

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

448

19

20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 472

Martinis, E. M., Grijalba, A. C., Pérez, M. B., Llaver, M., Wuilloud, R. G. 2017.

473

Synergistic

474

hybrids. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 37, 333-344.

475

Miller, J.C., Miller, J.N. Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry,

476

Sixth Edition, Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, 2010.

477

Monasterio, R.P., Lascalea, G.E., Martinez, L.D., Wuilloud, R. G., 2009.

478

Determination of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) species in parenteral solutions using a

479

nanostructured

480

absorption spectrometry. J. Trace Elem. Med Biol. 23, 157-166.

481

Mubarak, N. M., Faghihzadeh, A., Tan, K. W., Sahu, J. N., Abdullah, E. C.,

482

Jayakumar, N. S., 2017. Microwave Assisted Carbon Nanofibers for Removal of

483

Zinc and Copper from Waste Water. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 17(3), 1847-

484

1856.

485

Mubarak, N. M., Sahu, J. N., Abdullah, E. C., Jayakumar, N. S., Ganesan, P.,

486

2015. Novel microwave-assisted multiwall carbon nanotubes enhancing Cu (II)

487

adsorption capacity in water. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 53, 140-152.

488

Mubarak, N.M., Sahu, J.N., Abdullah, E.C., Jayakumar, N.S., 2016. Rapid

489

adsorption of toxic Pb(II) ions from aqueous solution using multiwall carbon

490

nanotubes synthesized by microwave chemical vapor deposition technique.

491

J.Environ.Sci. 45, 143-145.

492

Polo-Luque, M.L., Simonet, B.M., Valcárcel, M., 2013. Ionic liquid combined

493

with carbon nanotubes: A soft material for the preconcentration of PAHs.

494

Talanta.104, 169-172.

495

Ren, Y., Fan, Z., Wang, J., 2007. Speciation analysis of chromium in natural

496

water samples by electrothermal atomic absorbance spectrometry after

497

separation

498

immobilized on silica gel. Microchim. Acta.158, 227-231.

preconcentration

packed-microcolumn

ionic

and

liquid-nanomaterial

electrothermal atomic

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

material

with

RI PT

analytical

/

preconcentration

with

nanometer-sized

zirconium

oxide

20

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 499

Saçmaci, Ş., Kartal, Ş., Yilmaz, Y., Saçmaci, M., Soykan, C., 2012. A new

500

chelating resin: synthesis, characterization and application for speciation of

501

chromium (III)/(VI) species. Chem. Eng. J. 181, 746-753.

502

Séby, F., Charles, S., Gagean, M., Garraud, H., Donard, O.F.X., 2003.

503

Chromium

504

chromatography to inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry-study of the

505

influence of interfering ions. J. Anal. At. Spectrom.18, 1386-1390.

506

Seitz, W.R., Suydam, W.W., Hercules, D.M.,1972. Determination of trace

507

amounts of chromium(lll) using chemiluminescence analysis. Anal. Chem. 44,

508

957-963.

509

Shah, P., Strezov, V., Nelson, P.F., 2012. Speciation of chromium in Australian

510

coals and combustion products. Fuel.102, 1-8.

511

Tarigh, G.D., Shemirani, F., 2013. Magnetic multi-wall carbon nanotube

512

nanocomposite as an adsorbent for preconcentration and determination of lead

513

(II) and manganese (II) in various matrices. Talanta. 115, 744-750.

514

Thines, R. K., Mubarak, N. M., Nizamuddin, S., Sahu, J. N., Abdullah, E. C.,

515

Ganesan, P., 2017. Application potential of carbon nanomaterials in water and

516

wastewater treatment: A review. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 72, 116–133.

517

Tokalioğlu, Ş., Papak, A., Kartal, Ş., 2017. Separation/preconcentration of trace

518

Pb (II) and Cd (II) with 2-mercaptobenzothiazole impregnated Amberlite XAD-

519

1180 resin and their determination by flame atomic absorption spectrometry.

520

Arabian J. Chem.10, 19-23.

521

Tokalıoğlu, Ş., Yavuz, E., Şahan, H., Çolak, S.G., Ocakoğlu, K., Kaçer, M.,

522

Patat, Ş., 2016. Ionic liquid coated carbon nanospheres as a new adsorbent for

523

fast solid phase extraction of trace copper and lead from sea water, wastewater,

524

street dust and spice samples. Talanta. 159, 222-230.

by

hyphenation

of

high-performance

liquid

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

speciation

21

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 525

Tuzen, M., Soylak, M., 2007. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes for speciation of

526

chromium in environmental samples. J. Hazard. Mater.147, 219-225.

527

Wang, J., Chu, H., Li, Y., 2008. Why single-walled carbon nanotubes can be

528

dispersed in imidazolium-based ionic liquids. ACS Nano. 2, 2540-2546.

RI PT

529 530 531

SC

532 533

M AN U

534 535 536 537

541 542 543 544 545

EP

540

AC C

539

TE D

538

546 547 548 549 22

23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure captions

551

Figure 1. MFS for chromium speciation. A: conditioner; B: sample; C: water;

552

C1: channel 1; D: air; E: eluent; MWCNTs/IL: Multiwalled carbon nanotubes/ionic

553

liquid; V: solenoid valve; PP: peristaltic pump.

554

Figure 2. a) FBA system for Cr(VI) and Cr(III) determination. C2 to C6: channel

555

2 to 6; F: luminol; G: hydrogen peroxide; H: water; I: waste; MDC: mixing

556

detection chamber; MS: magnetic stirrer; V: solenoid valve; PP: peristaltic

557

pump; PPA: auxiliary peristaltic pump. b) MDC coupled to the stirring system. c)

558

MDC and the stirring system coupled to the detector.

559

Figure 3. X-Ray Energy Dispersive Microanalysis: (a) five different analyzed

560

areas, (b) analysis of area 3.

561

Figure 4. SEM images of soft material: (a) before chromium adsorption (20000x

562

and 50000x), (b) after analyte adsorption (20000x and 50000x).

563

Figure 5. The mechanism of chromium adsorption on the soft material.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP AC C

564

RI PT

550

23

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 1. Studied ranges and optimum values for chromium speciation variables. Studied ranges

Optimum values

Load flow rate (mL min-1)

0.80 - 4.04

1.21

Elution flow rate (mL min-1)

3.03 - 8.08 5 - 15

Elution volume (µL)

50 - 500

Stop-flow time (min)

5 -15

7.88 5

300 10

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

Sample volume (mL)

RI PT

Variables

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 2. Analysis of real samples

Cr(III) [µg L-1]

Drinking water

Cr(VI) [µg L-1]

Added

Found*

Recovery (%)

Added

40

42 ± 1

105

10

60

58 ± 3

97

50

40

38 ± 2

95

10

60

62 ± 2

103

40

43 ± 3

107

60

58 ± 1

AC C

EP

TE D

*The results are average of five replicates

97

100

49 ± 2

98

10.2 ± 3

102

50

52 ± 5

104

10

9.5 ± 2

95

60 ± 4

102

M AN U

Filtered tap water

Recovery (%)

10 ± 1

SC

Tap water

Found*

RI PT

Sample

50