Actinomycin inhibition of RNA synthesis in rat liver

Actinomycin inhibition of RNA synthesis in rat liver

BIOCHEMICAL Vol. 10, No. 3, 1963 AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS INFUBITION OF RNASYNTRESISIN RAT LIVER ACTINOMYCIN Ussx Merits Abbott L...

289KB Sizes 36 Downloads 163 Views

BIOCHEMICAL

Vol. 10, No. 3, 1963

AND BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

INFUBITION OF RNASYNTRESISIN RAT LIVER

ACTINOMYCIN

Ussx Merits Abbott Laboratories,

Received

January

14,

North Chicago, Illinois

1963

Actinomycin D hss been used successfully

as an analytical

tool in virus

research

and in studies of the synthesis of RNA. Bssed on the inhibition

cellular

RNA synthesis by actinomycin D, Reich, Franklin,

Shatkin and Tatum

(1962) suggested that the entire casplement of RRA(nuclear, transfer)

of bacterial

sensitive

and DNA-dependent reaction.

(1962) SUT~VM at in B. subtilis

~iaisr

actinomyein D blocks RNA synthesis

RNA polynerase but it does not affect

Very recently

RRA

Tsmaoki aud Mueller (1962) have studied

of all alasscs of RNAis iuhibitea

48 RNAbeing inhibited nucleotides

tot&L synthesis.

audAlexauder

of P32 orthophosphate into RRA in ReLa cells.

show that labeling

teminal

is produced in an actinomycin-

au enzyme which adds CMPen& AMP to the end of the

RNAchain.

ths inaorporation

ribommsl and

Rurwitz,Furth,Malsmy

CO~C~US~OIIS:

by inhibiting

pyrophosphorylase, transfer

and msmelieh cells

of

by actincmycin D, the

to a lesser extent than the other types. of transfer

Their data

The three

RNA (48 RNA) turn over independently of

These authors conelude that the nudleus is the reat of all

RRA synthesis in IQ&a cells. The evidence presented below indicates that aatiuomycin D inhibits incorporation

of P32 orthophosphate

in all

fozms of RXA in rat

liver.

the There

is else evidence that under these conditions the terminal triuucleotide sequmae pCpCpAin the 45 portion

of RNAcarries all the label.

Mile albino rats of the Roltsmauu strain weighing approximately were fasts& for 24 hours, then injected

intraperitoneally

254

with 1 mg.

250 g.

vol. 10. No. 3, 1963

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

sctinomycin D dissolved in 0.2 ml. propylene glycol.

Control sninls3s

Three hours later

received 0.2 ml. of propylene glycol.

10 mCP32 ortho-

phosphate vas injected by the sane route and the rats were killed thereafter.

The livers

four hours

were immediately homogenized in a Waring Blendor

with 70 ml. of phenol (MsUinckrodt,

Analytical

Reagent, 884) snd 60 ml. of

a solution consisting of 0.01 M phosphate buffer 1 mMtrisodium citrate

and 0.05s sodium lauryl

ph 6.8, 1 mMVersene, sulfate to which 0.05 g.

Bentonite was added. Bentonite V&B prepared according to Fraenkel-Conrat, Singer and Tsugita (1961). lauryl

sulfate

The combined

use of phenol snd 0.05s sodium

has been shownto cause the release of over 90$ of the total

RNAkeeping its contamination with DNAat a low level (Dingmsn and Sporn, 1962).

All extraction

procedures vere carried out at 4'.

The homogenate

was shaken for one hour, the emulsion was broken by centrifugation aqueous layer extracted

and the

once more with 40 ml. phenol and 0.03 g. Bentonite.

The water solution was made 0.2 M with respect to potassium acetate buffer (pH 5.6) and the RNAwas precipitated chilled

to -20' with dry ice.

from the 0.2 M acetate buffer

by the addition of 2 volumes of ethanol

The RNAwas then reprecipitated

three times

solution with 2 volumes of ethanol.

ssntples contained less that l$ DNAand l$ protein.

The final

These

precipitate

wss dissolved in 0.15 M NsCl to yield a l$ solution of IQJA, which was quickly

frozen and stored at -20'.

Three methods were used for the fractionation In the preliminary

of the RNAprepsrations.

experiments we applied the method of Barshaw, Brown and

Graham(1962) which is based on differential with streptomycin and 1 M N&l.

The fractions

precipitation

were dissolved in 2 ml. 0.15 M

NaCl and counted In a Baird Atomic scintillation Sucrose gradient centrifugatlon swinging-bucket rotor

at 4'.

spectrometer.

was carried out in a Spinco SW-39

The sample (O.lml.)

4.6 nip. linear gradient from 5-20s and centrifuged Fractions of 8 drops were collected

of RNAcomponents

was layered on top of a for 16 hours at 20,000 rpp.

and 3.0 ml. water added to each. 255

After

Vol. 10, No. 3, 1963

BIOCHEMICAL

measurementof the optical

AND BIOPHYSKAL

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

density at 260 mu the fractions

were evaporated on

aluminum planchets and counted in a gas-flow counter (covered with Mylar film). For the chromatographic fractionation

of RNA, the methylated albumin-

Kieselguhr (MAK) columns were prepared according to a simplified

Mandell-

Hershey procedure as described by Monier, Maono, Hayes, &yes and Gras (1962). A ssmple of 0.8 ml. (8 mg. RNAin 0.3 M NaCl) was applied and eluted under a linear

concentration

gradient between 0.3 H and 1.3 M NeCl both solutions

containing 0.05 M phosphate buffer

(p3 6.7).

150 cm. gave a flow rate of 50 ml./hr.

A hydrostatic

Fractions

pressure head of

of 3.5 ml. were collected.

Base analyses were carried out by the ionophoresis method of Davidson and Smellie (1952). light

The paper strips

and in a4nradio

were then scanned under ultraviolet

chrcanatogram scanner.

Finally

on the paper strips were cut out and counted directly

the nucleotide bands in the gas-flow counter.

RESULTS

In preliminary precipitation

experiments the RNAwas fractionated

technique, both actinomycin C (Sansmycin, Farbenfarbriken

AS) and D were used as inhibitors after

by the streptcmycin

the injection

and the rats were killed

of P32 orthophosphate.

actinomycin C and D in inhibiting

one to six hours

There is no difference

FtNAsynthesis in rat liver

of labeling

In ionophoretic

2) illustrate

DNA(4s BNA) that result anslysis unfractionated

animals revealed, under ultraviolet cytidylic, activity,

adenylic,

light,

gusnylic and uridylic

of high molecular

1) and frcna chramatographic the almost caplete

of label in the ribostmlal RNApeaks and the partial of Pj2 into transfer

It

of 4s RNA is much less pronounced.

Data from sedimentation experiments (Fig. separations on a KAK column (Fig.

between

or kidney.

CSn be seen frcm Table I that actinomycin prevents the labeling Veisht RNA, while the inhibition

Bayer

disappearance

blockage of the incorporation

f+rcm actinomycin D. RNApreparations

from control

bands for the four main nucleotides: acids.

When scanned for radlo-

all of these bends showed, as expected, the presence of P32. However,

the P32 content wss greatly

reduced in the adenylic, 256

guanylic and uridylic

acid

Vol. 10, No. 3, 1963

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Table I Incorporation

of P32 into Rat RNA

4s RN4

Time of labeling hrs.

Tissue

1

liver

CMP/g tissue

$ of control

4050 1733

42.8

5045 1500

control

cw 1

kidney

control

C 6

liver

control

C 4

liver

control

Dw

I

CMP/g tissue

$ of control

17925

456

2.5

29.8

23250 535

2.3

1745 716

40.6

64800 370

0.6

~96 1030

47.0

3~60 930

3.0

*C refers to actinomycin C treated animal. I

High molecular weight RNA

enim3J.s; D refers to actlnomycin D treated

CPM

1

OD

I

I

CPM

I

000

-

000

CONTROL

3

t

ACTINOMYCIN

D

750

750

500

500

250

250

P ‘UBE NO

I 10

Fig.

I 20

1.

I 30 Sedlmentotion

0

profiles

of rot

TUBE NO 10 liver RNA labeled

20 P32

with

30

40

‘i -

000

CONTROL

300

6-

300

6-

100

4-

ACTINOMYCIN

D

800

600

400

4s

2.4.6.6.,oo ,20 ,40 ,60 ,6j:ji$&k!^_,., ______ d 200

0

20

Fig. 2.

TUBE NO Chromotoqrophlc

fractionatmns

of rat

257

liver

RNA

40

60

labeled

80

IO0 120 TUBE NO wth P32

140

160

180 201 1

Vol. 10, No. 3, 1963

bands after activity

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

the rats had been treated with actinomycin D, and most of the radio-

was present in the cytidylic

acid (Table IX).

Table II Pj2 -labeled Nucleotide Composition of Total Rat Liver RNA The values given are moles/100 moles 2'- and 3'-nuc!.eotides Cytiaylic Acid

g:,'

Control*

67.6 63.8

Actinomycin II*

*Values are duplicate

It

determinations

ia known that rat liver

similar to that of the total

specific

32.0

33.5

19.2 17.3

12.1

9.9

13.1

12.2

RNAhas a nucleotide

10.4 10.9 hydrolysates

composition quite

the fact ,that after

RNApreparations

actino-

(of which the 4s part acid content suggests some

Since the three terminal nucleotides(pCpCpA)

RNAturn over independently f+rcm the rest

may carry the label.

In this case, after

the label should occur in cytidylic distributed

17.5 20.0

had such a high cytidylic

mechanismfor labeling.

of transfer

Uridylic Acid

RNA. Therefore,

mycin D treatment the unfractionated carried 97s of the label)

Cuanylic Acid

from the samealkaline

transfer

liver

Adenylic Acid

alkaline

of the RX?Achain, they

hydrolysis

at least 672 of

acid and the remaining P32 should be

between the nucleotides next to the pCpCpAsequence. That the

pCpCpAsequence indeed carries most, if not all,

of the label is indicated

by the data in Table II. In conclusion this investigation

showsthat

in the presence of actinomycin D

the synthesis of aJ.l forma of &A except the p~pt!pA end groups of transfer is inhibited

in rat liver.

tions of others in cell

These findings

confim

in the intact

RRA

mammaIobserva-

cultures.

The author would like to thank Mr. Werner Schulze for his excellent technical assistance. AtM.nomyuin Dwaa agift fromMerckSharp andDohrpe ReeeaFch Laboratories. 258

vol. 10, No. 3, 1963

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

References Davidson, J. N., EIII~R. M. S. Smellie, Blochem. J., 2, 594 (1952). Din&man, W., and M. B. @xn, BiOChim. BiOphp. ht8, 61, 164 (1962). Fraenkel-Conrat, H., Singer, B., and A. Teugita, Virology, 14, 54 (1961). Hsrshaw, J. P., Brown, R. A., and A. F. Graham, Anal. Biochem. 4, 182 (1962). Hurwitz, J., Furth, J. J., Malsmy, M., and M. Alexander, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 48, 1222 (1962). Monier, R., Naono, S., Hayes, D., Hayes, F., and F. Gras, J. Mol. Biol., 2,

w. (1962).

Reich, E., Franklin, R. M., Shatkin, A. J., and E. L. Tatm, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 48, 1238 (1962). Temmki, T., end 0. C. Mueller, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Coxmn.,p, 451 (1962).

259