Accepted Manuscript Title: Addition of magnesium sulphate to ropivacaine for spinal analgesia in dogs undergoing tibial plateau levelling osteotomy Author: C. Adami, D. Casoni, F. Noussitou, U. Rytz, C. Spadavecchia PII: DOI: Reference:
S1090-0233(15)00501-8 http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.11.017 YTVJL 4715
To appear in:
The Veterinary Journal
Accepted date:
27-11-2015
Please cite this article as: C. Adami, D. Casoni, F. Noussitou, U. Rytz, C. Spadavecchia, Addition of magnesium sulphate to ropivacaine for spinal analgesia in dogs undergoing tibial plateau levelling osteotomy, The Veterinary Journal (2015), http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.11.017. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Addition of magnesium sulphate to ropivacaine for spinal analgesia in dogs undergoing tibial plateau levelling osteotomy C. Adami a, *, D. Casoni b, F. Noussitou c, U. Rytz c, C. Spadavecchia b a
Department of Clinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hawkshead Campus, North Mymms, AL97TA Hatfield, Herts, UK b Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy Division, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Berne, Länggassstrasse 124, CH-3012 Berne, Switzerland c Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, Surgery Division, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Berne, Länggassstrasse 124, CH-3012 Berne, Switzerland
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 765 4183186. E-mail address:
[email protected] (C. Adami).
Page 1 of 20
22
Highlights
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
32
Abstract
33
Spinal magnesium sulfate added to ropivacaine enhances duration and intensity of the analgesia provided by ropivacaine in dogs undergoing TPLO. Spinal magnesium sulfate added to ropivacaine carries the potential for prolonged, though transient, impairment of the motor function. This can result in patient discomfort for several hours after surgery, and also make the post-operative care more demanding and expensive. Further studies may be necessary to identify still effective, though safer, magnesium doses to be administered spinally to dogs.
The aim of this blinded, randomised, prospective clinical trial was to determine
34
whether the addition of magnesium sulphate to spinally-administered ropivacaine would
35
improve peri-operative analgesia without impairing motor function in dogs undergoing
36
orthopaedic surgery. Twenty client-owned dogs undergoing tibial plateau levelling
37
osteotomy were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: group C (control,
38
receiving hyperbaric ropivacaine by the spinal route) or group M (magnesium, receiving
39
a hyperbaric combination of magnesium sulphate and ropivacaine by the spinal route).
40
During surgery, changes in physiological variables above baseline were used to evaluate
41
nociception. Arterial blood was collected before and after spinal injection, at four time
42
points, to monitor plasma magnesium concentrations. Post-operatively, pain was
43
assessed with a modified Sammarco pain score, a Glasgow pain scale and a visual
44
analogue scale, while motor function was evaluated with a modified Tarlov scale.
45
Assessments were performed at recovery and 1, 2 and 3 h thereafter. Fentanyl and
46
buprenorphine were administered as rescue analgesics in the intra- and post-operative
47
periods, respectively.
48 49 50
Plasma magnesium concentrations did not increase after spinal injection compared to baseline. Group M required less intra-operative fentanyl, had lower
Page 2 of 20
51
Glasgow pain scores and experienced analgesia of longer duration than group C (527.0
52
± 341.0 min vs. 176.0 ± 109.0 min). However, in group M the motor block was
53
significantly longer, which limits the usefulness of magnesium for spinal analgesia at
54
the investigated dose. Further research is needed to determine a clinically effective dose
55
with shorter duration of motor block for magnesium used as an additive to spinal
56
analgesic agents.
57 58
Keywords: Analgesia; Dog; Magnesium sulphate; Ropivacaine; Spinal anaesthesia
Page 3 of 20
59 60
Introduction Prevention and control of pain is one of the most important ethical obligations of
61
veterinarians. As a result, various aspects of this fascinating branch of anaesthesia have
62
been explored, and a number of novel techniques have been developed over the past
63
decades to improve peri-operative pain management. It is likely that a multimodal
64
approach has increased efficacy and, consequently, there has been particular interest in
65
agents that, although not classified as analgesics, do exert antinociceptive effects
66
(KuKanich et al., 2013; Madden et al., 2014; Crociolli et al., 2015; Norkus et al., 2015).
67 68
The use of magnesium has generated widespread interest as it could prevent
69
central sensitisation by acting as a non-competitive antagonist at N-methyl-D-aspartate
70
receptors in the dorsal horn, in a voltage-dependent fashion. Magnesium sulphate is
71
commercially available in Europe, and the formulation developed for parenteral use is
72
inexpensive, stable at room temperature and approved for use in dogs. Several studies in
73
both human patients and dogs suggest that magnesium sulphate exerts antinociceptive
74
effects (Bahrenberg et al., 2015), and consistently prolongs the duration of analgesia of
75
various local anaesthetics and opioid combinations when administered via either the
76
epidural or spinal route (Buvanendran et al., 2002; Oezalevli et al., 2005; Arcioni et al.,
77
2007). Additionally, a study in dogs investigating the neurotoxicity of intrathecal
78
magnesium sulphate found that a dose rate of 3 mg/kg did not cause neurological
79
deficits or histopathological changes in the spinal cord (Simpson et al., 1994).
80 81
Overall, these findings supported our hypothesis that a clinical trial investigating
82
the effects of spinally administered magnesium in client-owned dogs would be feasible
83
and ethically acceptable. The aim of this study was to compare the intensity and
Page 4 of 20
84
duration of peri-operative analgesia and motor block in client-owned dogs undergoing
85
elective orthopaedic surgery, after spinal administration of either ropivacaine, or a
86
combination of ropivacaine-magnesium sulphate. Our hypothesis was that the inclusion
87
of magnesium sulphate would provide longer lasting, better quality analgesia than
88
ropivacaine alone, without impairing neurological function of the pelvic limbs and/or
89
prolonging the duration of the motor block.
90 91
Materials and methods
92
Animals
93
Twenty client-owned dogs undergoing elective tibial plateau levelling osteotomy
94
(TPLO) between May 2014 and March 2015 were enrolled in the study. On arrival, a
95
pre-anaesthetic physical examination was performed, as well as venous blood sampling
96
for haematology and chemistry. Exclusion criteria were an American Society of
97
Anaesthesiologists risk category higher than 2, infectious skin diseases affecting the
98
lumbosacral area, and bleeding disorders. The clinical trial was approved by the
99
Committee for Animal Experimentation, Canton of Berne, Switzerland (Approval No.
100
BE11/14, 28 April 2014), and performed with informed owner consent.
101 102 103
Study design The study was designed as an investigator-blinded, block-randomised,
104
prospective clinical trial. Dogs were randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups
105
using a block randomisation method, based on shuffle and drawing of treatment
106
assignments inside an opaque, sealed envelope. One operator not involved in the study
107
was in charge of the allocations list, which was disclosed only at the end of the trial.
108
Page 5 of 20
109
A sample size calculation determined that ten dogs were needed in each treatment
110
group, to achieve a power of 0.9 with an α of 0.05, to detect a minimum difference of 60
111
min in the mean duration of analgesia (defined as the time elapsed from the spinal
112
injection to the first administration of rescue analgesics, either intra-operative fentanyl
113
or post-operative buprenorphine), between groups.
114 115 116
Anaesthetic protocol and procedures After IM premedication with acepromazine (0.03 mg/kg, Prequillan, Aprovet),
117
an appropriately sized IV catheter was placed in a cephalic vein. General anaesthesia
118
was induced with IV propofol (Propofol, Fresenius Kabi) titrated to effect to enable
119
orotracheal intubation, and maintained with isoflurane (IsoFlo, Abbott) vaporised in an
120
oxygen-air mixture and delivered via a circle system. All dogs received IV lactated
121
Ringer’s solution (Ringer-Lactat, Fresenius Kabi) at a rate of 10 mL/kg/h during
122
anaesthesia. The dorsal pedal artery of the non-surgical pelvic limb was catheterised to
123
allow blood sampling and continuous measurement of the systolic (SAP), mean (MAP)
124
and diastolic (DAP) arterial blood pressures. A multiparametric monitor was used to
125
assess cardiovascular (SAP, MAP, DAP, heart rate [HR]), and respiratory (end-tidal
126
carbon dioxide, PEʹCO2; peak inspiratory pressure, PIP; respiratory rate, RR; tidal
127
volume, TV; inspired fraction of oxygen, FIO2; end-tidal isoflurane tension, PEʹISO)
128
variables, as well as oesophageal temperature (T, °C). Data were manually recorded
129
every 5 min until the end of anaesthesia. The dogs were allowed to breathe
130
spontaneously unless PEʹCO2 was > 45 mmHg, in which case pressure-controlled
131
ventilation with PIP set at 10 cm H2O was used to maintain PEʹCO2 within the normal
132
range. A constant PEʹISO of 1.3%, equivalent to the minimum alveolar concentration
133
(MAC) for the species (Steffey et al., 2007), was targeted during anaesthesia.
Page 6 of 20
134 135
Hypotension, defined as MAP lower than 60 mmHg, was treated with a
136
crystalloid bolus (10 mL/kg lactated Ringer’s delivered IV over 10 min). Non-
137
responsive hypotension was treated initially with a colloid bolus (2 mL/kg tetrastarch
138
delivered IV over 10 min), and then with dopamine infusion, starting at a rate of 5
139
µg/kg/min. The dose was increased by 2.5 µg/kg/min every 10 min until MAP was
140
above 60 mmHg.
141 142
Bradycardia, defined as HR lower than 45 beats per min (bpm), was treated with
143
IV glycopyrronium, 10 µg/kg, administered as a bolus. Any clinical signs compatible
144
with hypermagnesaemia, including cardiac bradyarrhythmias and persistent
145
hypotension, were recorded.
146 147 148
After tracheal extubation, carprofen (4 mg/kg) was administered IV to all dogs. Dogs were discharged from the hospital 24 h after surgery.
149 150 151
Spinal injection Once the plane of anaesthesia was judged as adequate on the basis of clinical
152
assessments (jaw relaxation, absence of active blinking, slight or absent palpebral
153
reflex, immobility and physiological variables within normal ranges for the species),
154
spinal injection was performed by one of two anaesthetists (C.A. or D.C.), who were
155
blinded to the treatment. The dogs were positioned in lateral recumbency with the limb
156
to be operated on in a dependent position, with both pelvic limbs pulled symmetrically
157
cranially to maximise the length of the dorsal lumbar intervertebral spaces. The ilial
158
wings and the dorsal spinous processes of L5, L6 and L7 were used as anatomical
Page 7 of 20
159
landmarks. After surgical preparation of the area, a 75 mm 19 G spinal needle was
160
inserted towards the epidural space, with the bevel facing cranially, through the
161
interspinosus ligament between L6 and L5. The stylet was then withdrawn and the
162
needle slowly advanced until cerebrospinal fluid was observed at the hub of the needle.
163
A ‘dry tap’ after the third attempt of needle insertion was considered an exclusion
164
criterion.
165 166
Treatment groups
167
Group C (control) received ropivacaine (Naropin 1%, AstraZeneca), at a dose of
168
1 mg/kg (0.1 mL/kg). Group M (magnesium) received a mixture of magnesium sulphate
169
(2 g/10 mL, Magnesio Solfato, Galenica Senese), at a dose of 2 mg/kg (equivalent to a
170
volume of 0.01 mL/kg), and ropivacaine at a dose of 1 mg/kg. All treatments were
171
administered spinally.
172 173
For both treatments, the solution for injection was made hypertonic immediately
174
before the injection by adding 50% glucose (Glucose 50% BBraun, 0.002 mL/kg) to the
175
solution. The specific gravity of the solutions, measured with a refractometer, were
176
1.032 and 1.035 at 25 ºC for groups C and M, respectively. The solution was injected
177
over 1 min. Doses and volumes were based on previous reports in both human and
178
veterinary medicine (Oezalevli et al., 2005; Arcioni et al., 2007; Bilir et al., 2007;
179
Sarotti et al., 2011; Sanasilp et al., 2012).
180 181
Assessment of nociception
182
Intra-operatively, any increase in HR, MAP and/or RR of 20% above baseline
183
values (defined as the values recorded before skin incision, after PEʹISO values of 1.3%
Page 8 of 20
184
had been recorded consecutively for 15 min) were considered indicative of nociception.
185
When such increases were seen for at least two of these parameters, fentanyl (3 µg/kg,
186
IV) was administered as rescue analgesia.
187 188
Post-operatively, pain was assessed with a modified multifactorial pain score
189
(Sammarco et al., 1997; Adami et al., 2012) and the Glasgow pain scale (Holton et al.,
190
2001). Additionally, a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) with end points labelled
191
‘worst pain imaginable’ (0) and ‘no pain’ (10) was used. Cut-off values to administer
192
rescue buprenorphine (Temgesic, 10 µg/kg IV) were one or more pain scores exceeding
193
40% of the maximum value possible (>4 for the VAS, >6 for the Sammarco pain score,
194
and > 10 for the Glasgow pain scale). Neurological function of the pelvic limbs and the
195
degree of motor block were assessed with a modified Tarlov scale (Table 1)
196
(Buvanendran et al., 2002).
197 198
The assessments were performed as soon as the dogs were conscious enough to
199
respond to stimulation (vocal call and incitement to sit or stand up) and then at 60, 120,
200
180, 240 and 300 min thereafter. The evaluations were performed by one of two
201
observers (C.A. and D.C.), who were blinded to the treatment. During preliminary tests,
202
comparable pain and motor block scores were determined by the two observers when
203
independently evaluating the same dogs.
204 205 206
Blood sampling Arterial blood was sampled from the indwelling arterial catheter before the
207
spinal injection (baseline), and then 15, 60, 120 and 240 min thereafter. The samples
208
were placed in 1.3 mL heparinised tubes, which were centrifuged for 5 min at 3000 g
Page 9 of 20
209
and the obtained plasma frozen at -20 °C. Total plasma magnesium concentrations
210
(mmol/L) were determined from dogs in group M within 10 months of sample
211
collection, using a commercial colorimetric assay (Magnesium Gen 2, Roche
212
Diagnostics).
213 214
Statistical analysis
215
Normality of data was tested with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the
216
Shapiro-Wilk test. Repeated measures ANOVA, followed by Tukey Kramer’s multiple
217
comparison test, were used for the plasma magnesium concentrations, for physiological
218
variables and for post-operative pain and Tarlov scores, with treatment (group) and time
219
of data collection as factors. Physiological variables used for statistical analysis were
220
recorded at three predefined time points: (1) before the beginning of surgical stimulation
221
(used as baseline); (2) immediately after skin incision; and (3) immediately after the
222
beginning of tibial osteotomy.
223 224
The duration of anaesthesia and analgesia, as well as the number of intra-
225
operative fentanyl and post-operative buprenorphine boluses received by each group,
226
were tested using either one way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni multiple
227
comparison test, or Kruskal Wallis ANOVA on ranks followed by Dunn’s test. The
228
proportion of dogs within each group showing hypotension and/or bradyarrhythmias
229
were analysed with Fisher’s exact test.
230 231 232
Commercially available software (NCSS-2007, SigmaStat; SigmaPlot 12, Systat Software) were used. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
233
Page 10 of 20
234 235
Results Eleven female dogs (seven of which were neutered) and nine males (six of
236
which were neutered) were enrolled in the study. The dogs weighed 35.5 ± 22.0 kg,
237
with a mean age of 12.5 ± 5.8 years. Data for age, bodyweight, intra-operative fentanyl
238
requirement, duration of anaesthesia and analgesia and plasma magnesium
239
concentrations were normally distributed. The number of cases per treatment group was
240
equally distributed between the two observers.
241 242
Duration of anaesthesia was 267.3 ± 36.0 min (mean ± standard deviation) in
243
group M and 282 ± 36.0 min in group C; this difference was not statistically significant
244
(P = 0.37). Group M experienced significantly longer analgesia (527.0 ± 341.0 min;
245
Fig. 1) and required fewer intra-operative fentanyl boluses (median 0, range 0-1; Fig. 2)
246
than group C (176.0 ± 109.0 min, P = 0.015; median 1.5, range 0-4 boluses, P = 0.0018;
247
respectively).
248 249
Intra-operative physiological variables remained within normal ranges for the
250
species and no differences were detected between treatments or time points (Fig. 3).
251
However, one dog in group M and one dog in group C showed moderate sinus
252
bradycardia (40 beats per min) and arterial hypotension (MAP, 50 and 55 mmHg,
253
respectively) shortly after the spinal injection, which responded to glycopyrronium and
254
colloid administration, respectively. None of the dogs required rescue buprenorphine
255
before the final pain assessment.
256 257 258
Post-operatively, there were no significant differences between groups or time points in VAS (P = 0.36 and P = 0.57) and Sammarco (P = 0.17 and P = 0.16) pain
Page 11 of 20
259
scales (Fig. 4). However, group M had significantly lower scores for the Glasgow pain
260
scale (P = 0.012) and the Tarlov scale (P = 0.049) compared to group C (Fig. 4). The
261
Glasgow (P = 0.08) and the Tarlov (P < 0.001) scores significantly increased over time
262
in both groups. Two dogs in group M showed a persistent motor block, accompanied by
263
loss of deep pain sensation, which lasted 24 and 18 h; neurological function of the
264
pelvic limbs normalised progressively and no long-term complications were observed,
265
although these two dogs required longer hospitalisation and were discharged 72 h after
266
surgery.
267 268
Total plasma magnesium concentrations remained within physiological ranges
269
for the species (Fig. 5) and no significant differences were observed between subjects (P
270
= 0.015) or between time points (P = 0.61).
271 272 273
Discussion The main finding of this study is that spinal administration of magnesium
274
potentiates the analgesia provided by ropivacaine, in dogs undergoing elective
275
orthopaedic surgery. However, magnesium also prolongs the duration of motor block,
276
which makes it a less attractive adjunctive analgesic for peri-operative pain in client-
277
owned dogs, especially in those undergoing TPLO, as they are frequently large breed
278
dogs. Persistent motor block is likely to cause discomfort and to increase the costs of
279
hospitalisation. This is in contrast with the findings of most reports focusing on the
280
neuroaxial use of magnesium in both humans and canine patients, which indicated a
281
lack of effect of magnesium on motor function when administered by either epidural or
282
spinal routes (Buvanendran et al., 2002; Yousef and Amr, 2010; Shahi et al., 2014;
283
Bahrenberg et al., 2015). Nonetheless, magnesium was found to prolong and enhance
Page 12 of 20
284
brachial plexus motor block when used with lidocaine in human patients (Haghighi et
285
al., 2015).
286 287
The mechanisms by which magnesium causes motor block are unknown.
288
Magnesium sulphate is an inorganic salt which readily dissolves in water and becomes
289
almost completely dissociated across a wide pH range, from the low pH of the stomach
290
to the neutral pH of extracellular and cerebrospinal fluids1. An in vitro study on isolated
291
mammalian dorsal root ganglion neurons showed that bivalent and trivalent metal
292
cations transiently block voltage-activated calcium channel currents (Busselberg et al.,
293
1994). The ionised magnesium released by its salt could have acted so, blocking the
294
calcium currents by altering the resting potential of the neuronal membrane within the
295
spinal cord.
296 297
Another possible explanation is that, because the magnesium sulphate solution
298
used was hyperosmolar, it might have altered the osmotic homeostasis of cerebrospinal
299
fluid and spinal cord, leading to axonal shrinking and transient neurological
300
dysfunction. In vitro studies have shown that osmotically perturbed neurons are capable
301
of regulating their membrane capacitance, structural organisation and topology, and that
302
these changes are reversible (Wan et al., 1995; Mills et al., 1998). Furthermore,
303
dynamic changes in neuronal volume and surface area caused by osmotic manipulation
304
of isolated ganglia resulted in blockade of transmembrane sodium channels (Mills et al.,
305
1998), which is also a well-recognised mechanism of action by which local anaesthetics
306
interrupt sensory and motor transmission. For most solutions, however, osmolarity and 1
See: http://george-eby-research.com/html/stability_constants.html. (accessed 8 June 2015).
Page 13 of 20
307
specific gravity usually change in parallel, and therefore this explanation is less likely
308
because the solution for injection in both groups had very similar specific gravity.
309 310
Spinal administration of local anaesthetics has been shown to provide adequate
311
analgesia to dogs undergoing orthopaedic procedures (Sarotti et al., 2011), and is a
312
commonly used technique in clinical practice. For this reason, ropivacaine was selected
313
for use in the positive control group in this trial.
314 315
Spinal administration of magnesium did not increase total plasma magnesium
316
concentrations in the dogs enrolled in this trial. However, one limitation of our methods
317
is that plasma magnesium concentrations do not correlate with tissue concentrations,
318
with the exception of interstitial fluid and bone, nor does it reflect total body
319
magnesium (Elin, 2010). Moreover, only total magnesium, rather then the ionised,
320
biologically active form of the ion, could be measured. Another limitation is that blood
321
was collected over a relatively short period of time; more frequent sampling over a
322
longer period, though not feasible in client-owned animals, would have provided a more
323
complete picture of magnesium uptake and distribution. However, because clinical signs
324
compatible with hypermagnesaemia were not observed, it is reasonable to assume that
325
ionised magnesium stayed within acceptable ranges for the species.
326 327
Although cardiovascular variables remained within physiologically acceptable
328
limits, spinal injection in both groups resulted in a transient decrease in heart rate and
329
arterial blood pressure. Additionally, one dog in each group experienced persistent
330
hypotension and bradycardia, which required treatment with colloids and
331
anticholinergics. Administration of ropivacaine by the spinal route might result in
Page 14 of 20
332
decreased sympathetic outflow to the cardiovascular system (Levin et al., 1998).
333
However, because the incidence of cardiovascular side effects did not differ between
334
treatments, it is unlikely that they were caused by magnesium.
335 336
Conclusions
337
The addition of magnesium sulphate to spinal ropivacaine increased the intensity
338
and the duration of peri-operative analgesia in dogs undergoing orthopaedic surgery, but
339
the potential for prolonged motor block could limit its utility in clinical practice. Further
340
research might help to identify a dose with similar analgesic effects but with less
341
potential for prolonged motor block.
342 343 344 345
Conflict of interest statement None of the authors have financial or personal relationships with individuals or organisations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.
346 347 348
Acknowledgements The authors thank Dr. Christopher Seymour for kindly revising this manuscript.
349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362
References Adami, C., Veres-Nyéki, K., Spadavecchia, C., Rytz, U., Bergadano, A., 2012. Evaluation of peri-operative epidural analgesia with ropivacaine, ropivacaine and sufentanil, and ropivacaine, sufentanil and epinephrine in isoflurane anesthetized dogs undergoing tibial plateau levelling osteotomy. The Veterinary Journal. 194, 229-234. Arcioni, R, Palmisani, S., Tigano, S., 2007. Combined intrathecal and epidural magesium sulfate supplementation of spinal anesthesia to reduce post-operative analgesic requirements: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinava 51, 482-489.
Page 15 of 20
363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409
Bahrenberg, A., Dzikiti, B.T., Fosgate, G.T., Stegmann, F.G., Tacke, S.P., Rioja, E., 2015. Antinociceptive effects of epidural magnesium sulphate alone and in combination with morphine in dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 42, 319-328. Bilir, A., Gulec, S., Erkan, A., Ozcelik, A., 2007. Epidural magnesium reduces postoperative analgesic requirement. British Journal of Anaesthesia 98, 519-523. Busselberg, D., Platt, B., Michael, D., Carpenter, D.O., Haas, H.L., 1994. Mammalian voltage-activated calcium channel currents are blocked by Pb2+, Zn2+, and Al3+. Journal of Neurophysiology 71, 1491-1497. Buvanendran, A., McCarthy, R., Kroin, J., Leong, W., Perry, P., Tuman, K.J., 2002. Intrathecal magnesium prolongs fentanyl analgesia: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesthesia and Analgesia 95, 661-666. Crociolli, G.C., Cassu, R.N., Barbero, R.C., Rocha, T.L., Gomes, D.R., Nicácio, G.M., 2015. Gabapentin as an adjuvant for postoperative pain management in dogs undergoing mastectomy. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 77, 1011-1015. Elin, R.J., 2010. Assessment of magnesium status for diagnosis and therapy. Magnesium Research 23, 194-198. Haghighi, M., Soleymanha, M., Sedighinejad, A., Mirbolook, A., Nabi, B.N., Rahmati, M., Saheli, N.A., 2015. The effect of magnesium sulfate on motor and sensory axillary plexus blockade. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 5, e21943. Holton, L., Reid, J., Scott, E., Pawson, P., Nolan, A., 2001. Development of a behaviour-based scale to measure acute pain in dogs. Veterinary Record 148, 525-531. KuKanich, B., 2013. Outpatient oral analgesics in dogs and cats beyond nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: An evidence-based approach. Veterinary Clinic of North America: Small Animal Practice 43, 1109-1125. Levin, A., Datta, S., Camann, W.R., 1998. Intrathecal ropivacaine for labor analgesia: a comparison with bupivacaine. Anesthesia and Analgesia 87, 624-627. Madden, M., Gurney, M., Bright, S., 2014. Amantadine, an N-Methyl-D-Aspartate antagonist, for treatment of chronic neuropathic pain in a dog. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 41, 440-441. Mills, L.R., Morris, C.E., 1998. Neuronal plasma membrane dynamics evoked by osmomechanical perturbations. The Journal of Membrane Biology 166, 223-235.
Page 16 of 20
410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445
Norkus, C., Rankin, D., Warner, M., KuKanich, B., 2015. Pharmacokinetics of oral amantadine in greyhound dogs. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 38, 305-308. Oezalevli, M., Cetin, T., Unlugenc, H., Guler, T., Isik, G., 2005. The effect of adding intrathecal magnesium sulphate to bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinava 49, 1514-1519. Sammarco, J., Conzemius, M., Perkowski, S., Weinstein, M.J., Gregor, T.P., Smith, G.K., 1996. Postoperative analgesia for stifle surgery: A comparison of intraarticular bupivacaine, morphine, or saline. Veterinary Surgery 25, 59-69. Sarotti, D., Rabozzi, R., Corletto, F., 2011. Efficacy and side effects of intraoperative analgesia with intrathecal bupivacaine and levobupivacaine: A retrospective study in 82 dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 38, 240-251. Shahi, V., Verma, A.K., Agarwal, A., Singh, C.S., 2014. A comparative study of magnesium sulfate vs dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to epidural bupivacaine. Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology 30, 538-542. Simpson, J., Eide, T., Schiff, G., Clagnaz, J.F., Hossain, I., Tverskoy, A., Koski, G., 1994. Intrathecal magnesium sulfate protects the spinal cord from ischemic injury during thoracic aortic cross-clamping. Anesthesiology 81, 1493-1499. Steffey, E. and Mama, K., 2007. III Pharmacology In: Tranquilli W, Thurmon J,Grimm K, eds. Lumb and Jones' Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. Yousef, A.A., Amr, Y.M., 2010. The effect of adding magnesium sulphate to epidural bupivacaine and fentanyl in elective caesarean section using combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia: A prospective double blind randomised study. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 19, 401-404. Wan, X., Harris, J.A., Morris, C.E., 1995. Responses of neurons to extreme osmomechanical stress. The Journal of Membrane Biology 145, 21-31.
Page 17 of 20
446
Figure legends
447 448
Fig. 1. Duration of analgesia (min) in dogs receiving a spinal injection of either
449
ropivacaine alone (group C, n = 10) or a combination of ropivacaine and magnesium
450
(group M, n = 10). The asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference between
451
treatments (P < 0.05). The lines indicate median values. The upper and lower boxes
452
indicate the 75% and 25% of the values which fall below the upper and lower quartiles,
453
respectively. The upper and lower whiskers indicate the maximum and minimum
454
values.
455 456
Fig. 2. Number of intra-operative fentanyl boluses (3 µg/kg each bolus) administered to
457
20 dogs receiving a spinal injection of either ropivacaine alone (group C, n = 10) or a
458
combination of ropivacaine and magnesium (group M, n = 10). The lines indicate
459
median values. The upper and lower boxes indicate the 75% and 25% of the values
460
which fall below the upper and lower quartiles, respectively. The upper and lower
461
whiskers indicate the maximum and minimum values. The dots indicate the outliers.
462
The asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference between treatments (P <
463
0.05).
464 465
Fig. 3. Values for heart rate (HR, beats per min [bpm]) and mean arterial pressure
466
(MAP, expressed in mmHg) for 20 dogs receiving a spinal injection of either
467
ropivacaine alone (group C, n = 10) or a combination of ropivacaine and magnesium
468
(group M, n = 10). Data were recorded at three different time points: (1) before the
469
beginning of surgical stimulation (used as baseline); (2) immediately after skin incision;
470
and (3) immediately after the beginning of tibial osteotomy. The lines indicate median
Page 18 of 20
471
values. The upper and lower boxes indicate the 75% and 25% of the values which fall
472
below the upper and lower quartiles, respectively. The upper and lower whiskers
473
indicate the maximum and minimum values.
474 475
Fig. 4. Values for Sammarco pain score, Glasgow pain scale, Visual Analogue Scale
476
(VAS) and Tarlov scale for 20 dogs receiving a spinal injection of either ropivacaine
477
alone (group C, n = 10) or a combination of ropivacaine and magnesium (group M, n =
478
10). Data were recorded at four different time points: at recovery, as soon as the dogs
479
were conscious enough to be examined (time point 1), and then 1, 2 and 3 h after that
480
(time points 2, 3 and 4, respectively). The lines indicate median values. The upper and
481
lower boxes indicate the 75% and 25% of the values which fall below the upper and
482
lower quartiles, respectively. The upper and lower whiskers indicate the maximum and
483
minimum values. The asterisks and the daggers indicate statistically significant
484
differences between treatments and between time points, respectively (P < 0.05).
485 486
Fig. 5. Mean values ( standard deviations) of total plasma magnesium concentrations
487
(mmol/L) for 20 dogs receiving a spinal injection of either ropivacaine alone (group C,
488
n = 10) or a combination of ropivacaine and magnesium (group M, n = 10). Blood was
489
sampled at the following time points: before spinal injection (0, baseline), and then at
490
15, 60, 120 and 240 min thereafter.
491
Page 19 of 20
492
Table 1
493
Tarlov’s scale (modified from Buvanendran et al., 2002) used for neurological
494
assessment
495
Grade
Description
Grade 0
Flaccid paraplegia, no movements of the pelvic limbs, possible loss of bowel/urinary bladder control
Grade 1
Spastic paraplegia with moderate or vigorous purposeless movements of the pelvic limbs. No sitting, unable to walk
Grade 2
Good movements of the pelvic limbs but unable to stand
Grade 3
Able to stand but unable to walk normally, hips and pelvic limbs obviously unstable, moderate to severe ataxia
Grade 4
Able to stand and walk normally, some muscle weakness of the pelvic limbs may be seen
496 497 498
Page 20 of 20