Age related changes in lipid peroxidation in rat brain and liver

Age related changes in lipid peroxidation in rat brain and liver

Vol. 78, No. 2, 1977 BIOCHEMICAL AGE RELATED CHANGES TN LIPID 0. AND BIOPHYSICAL PEROXIDATION LIVER* RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS TN RAT BRAIN AN...

332KB Sizes 1 Downloads 105 Views

Vol.

78, No.

2, 1977

BIOCHEMICAL

AGE RELATED CHANGES TN LIPID 0.

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

PEROXIDATION LIVER*

RESEARCH

COMMUNICATIONS

TN RAT BRAIN AND

P. SHAlhU

Division of Biochemistry Central Drug Reseeroh Institute, Lucknow - 226001, India. Received

July

12,1977

SUMMARY

Lipid peroxidation in rat wide variations with age* In undergoes wide variations and between ascorbic acid content labile antioxidant factors are There is inverse relationship lipid peroxidation in ljvero

liver, unlike In brain shows liver, ascorbic acid content also there is negative correlation and lipid peroxidation@ Heatpresent In the cytosol fraction. between antioxidant activity and

INTRODUCTION The accumulation evidence Vance

for

--in viva

of lipid

stressed

as a function

lipid

peroxide

peroxidation

by others

investigate

of lipopigments

the of

(2). lipid

in .The

the

present

peroxidation

Is considered formation egeing studies system

(1). process were in rat

to be the The relehas been carried brain

out

to

end liver

age.

EXPERIMENTAL Male albino rats of different age groups drawn from the C.D,R,I, stock colony were fasted overnight (with water --ad libiBrain and liver were taken out, waahed turn) and decapitated. with chilled IFi0 mM KC1 and homogenates (10% W/v) prepared in 150 mh! KC10 Subcellular fractionation was done as described previously (3). 106,000 g supernetant has been designated as the cytosol fraction. For essay of lipid peroxides lo0 ml aliquots of tissue homogenates (or other reaction mixtures) were incubated at 37 + l°C in a metabolic shaker (120 strokes/rain, amplitude I Cm) for-3 hours, the amount of lipid peroxides formed was estimated by the thiobarbituric acid reaction and results have been expressed es malonyldialdehyde (MDA) using an extinction coefficient of lo56x105 at 535 nm (4). Protein estimation was done * Communication No.2294 from the Institute, Lucknow - 226001.

Central

Urug

Research

Vol. 78, No. 2, 1977

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Table

i

Phospholipid and iron contents brain and liver with Increase (Mean 2 S.D.) Lipid Brain 0

. : :

Pi(mg/iOO gm) : Liver

96.8:1,9

of rat in age ~ -.-_ (mg/iOO gm) : Liver

Iron Brain

131.0+14~0

1.9+_0.2

25.2+6.6

15

141.7+13.1

126e2212.7

1.320.2

5.621.4

25

136,9+17,6

iO2.82

lo620.2

8,3+1.2

30

i46,6+2io4

t04e9zQe 6

1,9+p.l

0.9+1*3

40

162e92904

130,7;ti3.6

2.120.4

8.420.8

60

168 0I+7 .O

149,0~12,6

3.5~1.6

9.e1.4

179.2+15,3

16S.6~14,9

2‘1~0.4

9.9+2,9

240

903

-The data

are mean of eix

experiments.

according to Lowry et al. (5) , asaorbic acid aacording to Roe and Kuether (6) andiron according to Fortune and Mellon (7). Lipids were extracted by the method of Folch and Coworker8 (8) and lipid phosphorus estimated as described earlier (9). Ascorbic acid oxidase (EC ic10.3c3) was prepared from bottle gourd (Lagenaria eiceraria) and assayed by the method of total antioxidant Lovett-Janison and Nelson (IO) 0 For assaying activity due to antioxidant enzymes like euperoxide dismutase (II), glutathione peroxidase- (12) and semidehydroascorbate dehydrogenase (13) amount of lipid peroxides formed by unheated and heated (for 5 minutes in boiling water bath) tissue homogenates was estimated and the results have been expressed ae percent increase in lipid peroxide formation on inactivating the labile antioxidant enzymes, RES ULTS

AM)

D ISCDSS ION

Rates of shown in Fig.

lipid

peroxidation

I. Phospholipid

liver

are shown in Table

brain

of 0 day old

age of the animal

animals

and ascorbic and iron Amount

I.

is rather

and reaches

of

acid

are

brain

and

content

in rat

lipid

peroxides

in the

increases

with

low,

it

a maximum in the

470

content

the

20 days old rate,

Vol.

78, No.

2, 1977

0

BIOCHEMICAL

60 AGRDAYS)

Fig.

120

thereafter

RESEARCH

COMMUNICATIONS

240 AGCCDAYS)

it

content

in

does

brain

age of

the

marked

alterations.

the

BIOPHYSICAL

- Lipid peroxidation and ascorbic acid content of rat brain and liver (Mean + SIT),) M Lipid peroxidation; M Ascorbic acid

i

tion

AND

in

not is

animal.

the

any

quite

low

Iron

content

On the

liver

suckling

show

shows

rats

marked

at

birth in

other

wide

(0-y 9O days),

a maximum range

months,

it

declines

brain

does

is

weaning

and reaches

forma-

quite

in

low

(21 days)

the

the

undergo

peroxide

It

during

with

not

lipid

ions*

after

ases and maintains thereafter

and increases

hand,

Yariat

Phospholipid

variation0

it

incre-

age of

one to two

level

of newborn

the

animals o On treating

tissue

homogenates

S3.6$

and 0S,i$

inhibition

liver

and brain

respectively,

brain

and liver

is apparently

is heat-labile ship

between

activity

is

increases level

and is lipid evident

of peroxide

two to three

liver0 fold

ascorbic formation

The antioxidant due to dismutase

shown in Fig*

peroxide for

with

formation

(Fig*

e

471

30 days

oxidase

was noticed

in

activity

of rat

reaction

which

2 and an inverse

Ant ioxidant within

acid

relation-

1) and antioxidant activity and remains

in brain at

this

Vol. 78, No. 2, 1977

BIOCHEMICAL

activity 2 - Antioxidant (Mean + S,Do) e-----e

Figo

Studies activity

on subcellular

indicate

free

fraction

rat,s

is less

that

(Table

On the

rats9 animals

rvations

correlation

animals

lipid

analysis

developing

role

for

ascorbic

have been takon

tion

between

rat8

rats.

mitochondrial

there

antioxidant

for

of lipid

acid

acid

present brain

experimentatfonc p8roxidationo

472

as old on addi-

The Same obsefrom

fractions. in Fig.

is negative

action

in rat

as well

suapewions

presented

and ascorbic

However,

(14).

formation

peroxidation

has been Attributed

brain

that

lipid

1 month old

show that

a non-enzymic

such a role

peroxide

from young

of the data

peroxidation

A similar

from 6 month old

when added to the cytosol

coefficient

implies

liv8ro

microsomes

from

particulate

from 6 months or 1 month old

in undergoing

fraction

Statistical

It

hand,

antioxidant

the

fraction lipid

microsomes

have been made with

young and old

between

with

the

with

The cytosol in promoting

do not differ

of

iS associated

2).

other

of cytosol

in rat brain and liver Brain; o----o Liver.

localization

it

efficient

when reconstituted

tion

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

correlation

content

in liver.

of ascorbic to ascorbic

Studies

I for

acid acid

in in

do not suggest

in the age groups There ascorbic

is

no correla-

acid,

phospho-

Vol. 78, No. 2, 1977

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL

Table Lipid

peroxidation

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

2

in young

and old rats.

-BP

Reaction

n mole Malonyl dlaldehyde/ml reaction mixture/3hr

mixture

Cytosol

(I)

+ 3dicrosomes (4.)

Cytosol

(6)

+ Micr*somes

(I)

5.6

Cytosol

(I)

+ hlierosomes

(6)

14.6

Cytosol

(6)

+ Mlcrosomes

(6)

7.5

14.3

The reaction mixture (Oe’f5 ml) contained cytoeol (106,OOr) g supernatant, 3*22 mg protein) and microsonal suspension in 150 !nU KC1 (690 ug protein), In parentheses the age of the animal in month 4 18 given0

lipid

and iron

content

brain*

In consonance

Stewart

(15)

brain

acid,

vitamin

lipid

peroxide

Ascorbic

acid

peroxidation,

of young

formation oxidase

workers

(14,

Low level

and liver

the

presented

9 imply

(16,

17).

of

lipid

inhibition

a dual

upon its

of

1) show an These observa-

in liver* role

has been ascribed

depending

mediator

above (Fig.

acid

and of ascorbic

amounts

natural

in

peroxident

to ascorbic

concentration

as acid

by

in the

159 19). of antioxidants

special

propensity

Frinna

and Barber

peroxides

about

ascorbic

that

brain

activity

of Allison

had higher

in rat brings

of

as antioxidant

tissues

rats

C has been shown to be the

action

earlier

antioxidant

the observations

al t,hough paradoxical

well the

with

The results

antioxidant tions,

and enzymatic

in older

in brain

to accumulate (21)

lipopigments

have also

animals.

may contribute

observed

In liver,

473

with

lower

output

to

ageing

values

of lipid

its (20),

of lipid peroxi-

Vol. 78, No. 2, 1977

de8 appears tic

to be subtly

antioxidants

peroxidation to

its

young tion

lity is

{Fig.

role

I,

lipofuscin lipid

obscure0

It

the liver

an inbuilt

The wide

The reason (I)

may also

in lipid

may have relevance

and disposition

(22)

the reported

in the

old animals

inspiteof

antioxidant

activity

be surmised

mechanism against

and erdyma-

for

and high

animals

acid

variations

in liver

metabolism

peroxides

of old

by ascorbic

levels

pigments

of

of

2).

in drug

and old animals, of

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

regulated

and antioxidant

special

low levels still

BIOCHEMICAL

to

that

undergo

the adveree

lower lipid effects

in

accumulathe is

susceptlbiperoxidation of ageing

process a ACKNOWLEDGWENTS The author is grateful to Dr. C.R, Krishna Murti for guidance and inspiration, to Dro O.P. Shukla for helpful discussions and critical perusal of the manuscript and to the Council of Scientific and Industr’ial Research, New Delhi, India for the award of a Research Fellowship. REFERENCES 1, 2-0

3. 4r 5. 6.

Tappel, &L. (1979) Fed* Proc.(F.ASEB Meeting} p. 239, Minoru, O,, Manfred, S, and Mario, B, (1969) Blood, 34, 712-716 0 Schneider, W.C, and Hogeboom, G,Ho (1950) 3. Biol. Chem. 183, 123-128. Bernheim, Fc and Hochstein, P. (1967) Arch, Utley, H.G,, Biochem. Biophye,, 118, 29-32. Lowry O.H., Rosebzgh, N,J., Farr, A.L. and Randall, R,J. (1951) J. Riol, Chem. 193, 265-275, Roe, J,Ho and Kuether,TA* (1943) Jo Biol, Chem. 147, 399-407 W.B, and Nbllon, M.Go (1957) cited in Methods in Fortune, Enzymology, Vole 3p p. 1017 (Edited by S,P, Colowick and N. 0. Kaplan) o G.Ho (1957) J, Folch, J., Lees, M. and SloaneSt.anley, Biol* Chemo 226, 497-509. Rouser, G,, motes, A.N, and Fleischer, So (1966) lipids, A., 85-86. Covett-Janison, P.Le and Nelson, J.M. (1940) Jo Amero Chem. sot, 62, 1409-1412. I. (1975) Ann* Rev. Biochemo 44, 147-159. Fridovich, Christopheraen, B.0. (1969) Biochimo Biophys, Acta. 176, 463-470. Green, R,C. and O’Brien, P.J, (1973) Blochim, Biophys. dcta, 293, 334-342. Ad1ard,8,P,F. (1974) Biochemc Soce Trans. 2, 281-284, l

70 8. 9. IO. il. 12c 134 140

474

Vol. 78, No. 2, 1977

15. 16. 17* 16, 190 20. 21. 22.

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

Allison, J,H. and Stewart, MoA, (1973) Jo Neurochem. z, 1705-1786. Sharma, O.P, and Krishna Murti, COB, (1976) Jo hmchem. 27, 299-301, Barber, Aode (1966) Lipids, & 146-1st. Hunter, F.E. Jr*, Soott, A,, Hoffstein, P.E., Guerra, F., Weinstein J., Schneider, Ao, Schutz, B,, Fink, J. and Ford, L. (1964) J, Biolo Chem. 239, 604-613. Sharma, O.P, (1977) Indian Jc Bioche& Riophye, (In prese), (1969) in Pigments In Pathology Porta, E.AA, and Hartfort edited by W. Wolman, New York, Academic Pre8S, pp 191, Grinna, L.S, and Barber, &,A. (1973) Blochem* Biophys, Reso Commun* 55, 773-779, Schacter, B,A., Marver, HA, and Meyer, U,A, (1973) Drug Metaso Disposition, & 286-290.

475