Alteration of Terminal Heterochromatin and Chromosome Rearrangements in Derivatives of Wheat-Rye Hybrids

Alteration of Terminal Heterochromatin and Chromosome Rearrangements in Derivatives of Wheat-Rye Hybrids

Accepted Manuscript Alteration of Terminal Heterochromatin and Chromosome Rearrangements in Derivatives of Wheat-rye Hybrids Shulan Fu, Zhenling Lv, X...

881KB Sizes 0 Downloads 12 Views

Accepted Manuscript Alteration of Terminal Heterochromatin and Chromosome Rearrangements in Derivatives of Wheat-rye Hybrids Shulan Fu, Zhenling Lv, Xiang Guo, Xiangqi Zhang, Fangpu Han PII:

S1673-8527(13)00103-3

DOI:

10.1016/j.jgg.2013.05.005

Reference:

JGG 217

To appear in:

Journal of Genetics and Genomics

Received Date: 14 March 2013 Revised Date:

28 April 2013

Accepted Date: 3 May 2013

Please cite this article as: Fu, S., Lv, Z., Guo, X., Zhang, X., Han, F., Alteration of Terminal Heterochromatin and Chromosome Rearrangements in Derivatives of Wheat-rye Hybrids, Journal of Genetics and Genomics (2013), doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2013.05.005. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1

Alteration of Terminal Heterochromatin and Chromosome Rearrangements in

2

Derivatives of Wheat-rye Hybrids

3 4

Shulan Fu a, b, Zhenling Lv a, Xiang Guoa, Xiangqi Zhang a, Fangpu Han a

RI PT

5 6

a

7

and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

8

b

9

611130, China.

State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics

10

*Corresponding Author

12

Phone: +86-10-6480 7926; Fax: +86-10-7485 4467

13

E-mail: [email protected]

14

M AN U

11

SC

Key Laboratory of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu

15

The main text is composed of 16 pages, 4788 words and 6 figures. The number of words in the

16

abstract is 153.

AC C

EP

TE D

17

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Abstract: Wheat-rye addition and substitution lines and their self progenies revealed variations

19

in telomeric heterochromatin and centromeres. Furthermore, a mitotically unstable dicentric

20

chromosome and stable multicentric chromosomes were observed in the progeny of a Chinese

21

Spring-Imperial rye 3R addition line. An unstable multicentric chromosome was found in the

22

progeny of a 6R/6D substitution line. Drastic variation of terminal heterochromatin including

23

movement and disappearance of terminal heterochromatin occurred in the progeny of wheat-rye

24

addition line 3R, and the 5RS ditelosomic addition line. Highly stable minichromosomes were

25

observed in the progeny of a monosomic 4R addition line, a ditelosomic 5RS addition line and

26

a 6R/6D substitution line. Minichromosomes, with and without the FISH signals for telomeric

27

DNA (TTTAGGG)n, derived from a monosomic 4R addition line are stable and transmissible to

28

the next generation. The results indicated that centromeres and terminal heterochromatin can be

29

profoundly altered in wheat-rye hybrid derivatives.

31

M AN U

30

SC

RI PT

18

32

Keywords: Wheat-rye addition lines; Chromosome rearrangements, Multiple Centromeres,

33

Minichromosomes; Heterochromatin

AC C

EP

TE D

34

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

35

1. INTRODUCTION

36

Heterochromatin plays an important role in maintaining the structure and function of

38

centromeres and telomeres. Both terminal and centromere regions contain satellite repeats and

39

retrotransposons that are usually packaged into heterochromatin (Pearce et al., 1996; Miller et

40

al., 1998; Henikoff et al., 2001; Houben and Schubert, 2003; Bühler and Gasser, 2009). The

41

dynamics of centromere and telomere evolution in plants has been reviewed (Nagaki et al.,

42

2003; Fajkus et al., 2005; Ma et al., 2007). It has been reported that the activation of

43

heterochromatic transcription can be affected by environmental and genetic stress conditions

44

(Tittel-Elmer et al., 2010). Interspecific hybridization is among the stresses that trigger

45

reorganization of the parental genomes (McClintock, 1978). Alteration of rye (Secale cereale

46

L.) terminal heterochromatin in triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack) and in progeny derived

47

from triticale × wheat (Triticum ssp.) has been investigated (Appels et al., 1982; Gustafson et

48

al., 1983; Lukaszewski and Gustafson 1983; Lapitan et al., 1984). Subsequently, fluorescence

49

in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to detect the variation of terminal/subterminal

50

heterochromatin of rye chromosomes in wheat-rye addition and substitution lines (Alkhimova

51

et al., 1999). These previous studies focused on the variations of rye terminal/subterminal

52

heterochromatin and the main variation patterns were deletion and amplification. Several

53

studies on centromeres have focused on centromeric DNA sequences and proteins, epigenetic

54

regulation and centromeric activity (Henikoff et al., 2001; Heit et al., 2006; Dalal et al., 2007).

55

Although centromeres are usually maintained as unique loci on chromosomes, alteration in

56

centromeres such as neocentromeres, holocentromeres, dicentric chromosomes, multiple

57

centromeres and stable chromosomes without centromeric repeats have been reported (Kynast

58

et al., 2000; Hiatt et al., 2002; Nasuda et al., 2005; Guerra et al., 2010; Gao et al., 2011; Fu et

59

al., 2012; Neumann et al., 2012; Masonbrink et al., 2013; Fu et al., 2013). Holocentric

60

chromosomes contain a kinetochore that spans the whole length of a chromosome.

61

Holocentromeres have been reported in organisms such as insects (Heteroptera), worms

62

(Parascaris univalens, Caenorhabditis elegans) and plants (Guerra et al., 2010). Dicentric

63

chromosomes were formed through asymmetric chromosome translocation. In maize, dicentric

64

chromosomes that involved A-B chromosomes and A-A chromosomes were described (Han et

65

al., 2006, 2009; Gao et al., 2011). A transmissible dicentric chromosome was mentioned in

66

wheat by Sears (1946). Sears and Camara (1952) further observed that this chromosome was

67

derived from an isochromosome involving the short arm of chromosome 7, which was later

68

specified to be chromosome 7B. This chromosome has three functional centromeres (Zhang et

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

37

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

69

al., 2010). Multicentric chromosomes were reported for animals (Paweletz et al., 1989;

70

Hadlaczky et al., 1991), wheat (where gametocidal genes could lead to the formation of

71

multicentric chromosomes) (Kynast et al., 2000) and pea (Pisum sativum) (Neumann et al.,

72

2012).

RI PT

73 74

In this study, we investigated the alterations of terminal and centromeric heterochromatin in

75

wheat-rye alien addition, substitution and translocation lines. Some interesting phenomena

76

including change of terminal heterochromatin position and formation of multi-centromeres,

77

dicentric chromosomes and minichromosomes were uncovered.

SC

78

2. RESULTS

80

2.1 Centromere variation in the progeny of the 3RCI disomic addition line

81

In the self progeny of a 3RCI disomic addition line, we obtained a dicentric chromosome, which

82

was a wheat-rye translocation chromosome (Fig. 1A). This chromosome is unstable because its

83

two kinetochores may bind to spindle fibers from opposite poles, resulting in chromosome

84

breakage during mitotic divisions, as evidenced by FISH screening in the root tip cells two

85

months after planting (Fig. 1B). Simultaneously, a wheat chromosome with multiple

86

centromeres was observed in the progeny of the 3RCI disomic addition line. This chromosome

87

probably descended from chromosome 1B based on the arm ration and presence of a satellite

88

(Fig. 1C). Immunolocalization of H2AThr133ph can detect multiple active centromeres (Dong

89

and Han, 2012) that may in some cases behave as a single centromere during mitosis (Fig. 1D).

90

In the next generation, this multi-centric chromosome was lost, suggesting its meiotic

91

instability.

TE D

EP

92

M AN U

79

2.2 Variations of rye terminal heterochromatin

94

In the 3RS ditelosomic line, the rye terminal heterochromatic blocks can be distinguished by

95

strong GISH signals at one end of the 3RS telosome (Fig. 2A). Subsequent FISH with the rye-

96

specific subtelomeric tandem repeat pSc200 and the highly repetitive DNA sequence pSc119.2

97

labeled the terminal region of 3RS (Fig. 2B) which coincided with the rye terminal

98

heterochromatin. In another 3RS ditelosomic addition line 3RS-1, the terminal heterochromatin

99

of the 3RS has moved to a subterminal position of 3RS (Fig. 2C) as did the signals of repetitive

AC C

93

100

sequences, pSc119.2 and pSc200 (Fig. 2D). Among the selfed progeny of 3RS-1, in some

101

plants the rye terminal heterochromatin and the highly repetitive DNA sequences pSc119.2 and

102

pSc200 were lost (Fig. 2 E and F). 4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

In a line of the selfed progeny of the 5RS ditelosomic addition line (MK5RSdite), all mitotic root

104

cells possessed a chromosome fragment containing the terminal heterochromatin of rye

105

chromosome arm 5RS (Fig. 3). However, the terminal heterochromatin was moved into a

106

subterminal position (Fig. 3A and C). Subsequent FISH using pSc119.2 as probe confirmed this

107

presumption (Fig. 3 B and D). Another kind of minichromosomes derived from 5RS, which lost

108

the terminal heterochromatin, but retained the CRW signal, were also observed in some mitotic

109

cells (Fig. 3C and D)

110

RI PT

103

2.3 Minichromosomes in progeny of 4R addition lines

112

One particular wheat line (MK4Rmon-mini) was detected among the self progeny of the 4R

113

monosomic addition line MK4Rmon. GISH and FISH using rye genomic DNA (green) and

114

CRW (red) as probes indicated that the two minichromosomes were rye chromosomes (Fig.

115

4A). However, only one minichromosome contained telomere signals. The other

116

minichromosome is either a ring or a telomere-depleted linear chromosome (Fig. 4B). Some

117

self progeny of MK4Rmon-mini still contained minichromosomes, and four types of

118

minichromosomes were observed. The first one was the same as that in MK4Rmon-mini. The

119

second one contained two minichromosomes with telomere signals indicating a linear structure

120

(Fig. 4C). The last two types contained only one minichromosome with or without telomere

121

signals (Fig. 4D and E). Immunolocalization revealed CENH3 on minichromosomes with and

122

without the telomere signals (Fig. 4F). The minichromosomes with telomere signals could be

123

transmitted to the next generation at a frequency of about 55%, while the transmission

124

frequency of minichromosomes without telomere oligonucleotide signals was only about 10%.

M AN U

TE D

EP

125

SC

111

2.4 Variation of centromere in 6R/6D substitution line

127

In one of the self progeny of the 6R/6D substitution line, several kinds of special chromosomes

128

were discovered. These special chromosomes included a minichromosome that was almost

129

totally composed of rye centromere sequence (Fig. 5A), a small ring chromosome having two

130

rye centromeres (Fig. 5B), a large ring chromosome possessing four rye centromeres (Fig. 5C)

131

and a multicentromeric chromosome containing four rye centromeres (Fig. 5D). In this

132

multicentromeric chromosome, the four centromeres were similar in size and appeared as

133

individual units interspersed by segments of noncentromeric chromatin (Fig. 5D). All

134

minichromosomes, small ring chromosomes and multicentromeric chromosomes originated

135

from rye chromosome 6R (Fig. 5 E and F).

AC C

126

136 5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

3. DISCUSSION

138

3.1 Variation in rye terminal heterochromatin

139

The mechanism for the observed positional change of terminal rye heterochromatin variation

140

(Figs. 2 and 3) remains to be elucidated. It has been inferred that amplification of terminal

141

heterochromatin may be caused by non-reciprocal translocation (Lapitan et al., 1984), but non-

142

reciprocal translocations have never been proved experimentally. Rather, paracentric inversion

143

could have been the reason for a shift into subterminal position, and intrachromosomal

144

recombination between directed repeats for deletion of the rye terminal heterochromatin.

145

Alternatively, unbalanced segregation from reciprocal translocations can yield daughter nuclei

146

with duplications and deletions of chromosomes (Schubert and Lysak, 2011).

147

SC

RI PT

137

3.2 Formation of minichromosomes and multicentromeres

149

Minichromosomes and multicentromeres have been discovered in transformed mouse and rat

150

cells (Paweletz et al., 1989; Hadlaczky et al., 1991). Minichromosomes in human cells were

151

obtained by adding telomeric DNA to break ends of the Y chromosome (Heller et al., 1996).

152

Minichromosomes were also reported for maize (Kato et al., 2005; Han et al., 2007). Maize

153

minichromosomes were originally generated by the breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) cycle

154

(McClintock, 1941). Engineered minichromosomes were constructed in maize by modifying

155

natural A and supernumerary B chromosomes (Yu et al., 2007). In the present study,

156

minichromosomes in progenies of the 4R monosomic addition line, the 5RS ditelosomic

157

addition line (Figs. 3 and 4) and the 6R/6D substitution line (Fig. 5) were observed. We assume

158

that rye chromosome arms in a wheat background facilitate genomic instability.

159

Multicentromeres were observed in the progeny of the 3R disomic addition line on a wheat

160

chromosome and in the progeny of 6R/6D substitution lines within the rye part of a wheat-rye

161

translocation chromosome (Fig. 1C; Fig. 5Dand E). The mechanisms for the formation of

162

multicentromeres in 3R disomic addition and 6R/6D substitution lines should be different from

163

the ones in the wheat containing 4Mg chromosome (Kynast et al., 2000) because there are no

164

gametocidal genes in the materials used in the present study. Paweletz et al. (1989) put forward

165

that the multicentromere was formed through formation of a side-arm bridge and rejoining of

166

broken ends. The wheat multicentromere in the 3R disomic addition line should have been

167

formed by transposition of centromeric retrotransposons. It has been reported that wide

168

(interspecific) hybridization can activate retrotransposons (Scheinker et al., 1990; Jiang et al.,

169

2011). Centromeric variations including amplifications of centromere-specific satellite repeats

170

and transposable elements were also observed in interspecific macropodid hybrids (Metcalfe et

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

148

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

al., 2007). It seems possible that the 3R chromosomes added into wheat can provoke structural

172

variation of chromosomes and expansion of repetitive DNA sequences by retrotransposition.

173

The formation of minichromosomes and multicentromeres occurred together in the 6R/6D

174

substitution line. A model is presented to explain their formation (Fig. 6). Breaks within both

175

arms of chromosome 6R possibly led to a minichromosome containing a rye centromere. One

176

of the break ends of the minichromosome fused after DNA replication and a small chromosome

177

containing two rye centromeres −again with two break ends− was formed. There were two

178

destinies for the small dicentric chromosome. First, the two broken ends of the small dicentric

179

chromosome may fuse and form a dicentric ring chromosome. Second, one of the break ends of

180

the linear dicentric chromosome fuses again after replication and a chromosome possessing four

181

rye centromeres was formed. Alternatively, the tetracentric chromosome could result from a

182

sister chromatid exchange within the dicentric ring chromosome, or the linear chromosome

183

with four centromeres formed a ring by fusion of its ends. It has already been reported that

184

multicentromeric chromosomes are unstable (Paweletz et al., 1989; Hadlaczky et al., 1991). In

185

the present study, the multicentromere in the 6R/6D substitution line was also unstable. During

186

mitotic divisions breaks could occur between the centromeres of the dicentric or the tetracentric

187

chromosome; thus resulting in minichromosomes derived from dicentric or tetracentric

188

chromosomes (Fig. 6).

189

Remarkably, the multicentromere in the 3R disomic addition line was stable and could be

190

perpetuated through mitosis. Page and Shaffer (1998) have investigated the stability of the

191

centromere of a dicentric human chromosome resulting from a Robertsonian translocation

192

between chromosomes 13 and 14, and found that close proximity of two functional centromeres

193

favoured stability of dicentric chromosomes. Close physical proximity of the multicentromeres

194

in the 3R disomic addition line made them behaving as a single centromere because instability

195

caused by breakage of mitotic bridges occurs only when sister chromatids between centromeres

196

take up a twisted instead of a parallel orientation. The probability of twisting increases with the

197

distance between the centromeres.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

198

RI PT

171

199

3.3 Formation of a dicentric chromosome

200

The dicentric chromosome in this study was formed by asymmetric translocation of

201

chromosome 3R and a wheat chromosome, similar as in cases described by (Lukaszewski 1995;

202

Wang et al., 1995). Apparently, the dicentric chromosome in the present study was unstable,

203

indicating that the wheat and the rye centromere were active and the distance between them too

204

large to prevent mitotic instability. 7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

205 206

In conclusion, our results indicated that the variations of terminal heterochromatin and

207

centromeres can be mediated by intergeneric hybridization.

208

4.. MATERIALS AND METHODS

210

4.1 Plant materials

211

1R-7R wheat-rye disomic addition lines, were derived from Chinese Spring wheat × Imperial

212

rye (1RCI-7RCI) and the disomic addition lines were from Chinese Spring wheat × KingII rye

213

(1RCK-7RCK). These seed stocks were kindly provided by the USDA-Sears Wheat Stock

214

Collection. A 3RS monotelosomic addition line and a 3RS ditelosomic line, was selected from

215

self progeny of the 3RCI disomic addition line. The 4R monosomic addition line contains a

216

single 4R chromosome of rye cultivar Kustro and the entire genome of wheat cultivar

217

Mianyang11 (MK4Rmon). The 5RS ditelosomic addition line, a self progeny of 5R monosomic

218

addition line, contains two short arms of chromosomes 5R of Kustro and the entire genome of

219

wheat cultivar Mianyang11 (MK5RSdite). The wheat-rye 6R/6D substitution line is derived

220

from Chinese Spring wheat × Imperial rye, These lines were created by our lab.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

209

221

4.2 Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

223

Chromosome spreads of root tips were prepared according to the method described by Han et

224

al. (2006). Rye genomic DNA, the cereal centromere-specific repetitive DNA sequence CRW

225

(Liu et al., 2008), the rye centromere-specific repetitive DNA sequence pAWRC.1 (Francki,

226

2001), the highly repetitive sequences, pSc119.2 and pSc200, cloned from S. cereale (McIntyre

227

et al., 1990; Vershinin et al., 1995), the Aegilops tauschii clone pAs1 (Rayburn and Gill, 1986)

228

and wheat telomeric DNA (TTTAGGG) were used as probes. Rye genomic DNA, pSc119.2,

229

wheat telomeric DNA and pAWRC.1 were labeled with fluorescein-12-dUTP (PerkinElmer,

230

USA). CRW, pSc200 and pAs1 were labeled with Texas-red-5-dUTP (PerkinElmer,USA).

EP

AC C

231

TE D

222

232

4.3 Immunolocalization in somatic cells

233

Immunostaining of mitotic chromosomes was performed as described (Han et al., 2009), using

234

antibodies against histone H2A phosphorylated at threonine residue 133 (H2AThr133ph) (Dong

235

and Han, 2012) and a self-made antibody against wheat CENH3. Observations were made

236

under an epifluorescence Olympus BX61 microscope (Olympus, Japan) equipped with a cooled

237

charge-coupled device camera operated with MetaMorph software, and processed with

238

Photoshop CS 3.0. 8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

239

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

241

This work was supported by the grants of the National High Technology Research and

242

Development Program (“863” Program) of China (No. 2011AA100101) and the Special

243

Financial Grant from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2012T50157), and 2011

244

collaborative innovation plan of the ministry of education of China. We would like to thank Dr.

245

J. Perry Gustafson, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA for providing the wheat-rye

246

addition lines used in this study, and Dr. James A. Birchler, University of Missouri, Columbia,

247

USA for his critical reading of the manuscript.

SC

248 249

REFERENCES

M AN U

250 251 252

RI PT

240

Alkhimova, A.G., Heslop-Harrison, J.S., Shchapova, A.I., Vershinin, A.V., 1999. Rye

253

chromosome variability in wheat-rye addition and substitution lines. Chromosome Res. 7,

254

205-212.

258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266

Bühler, M., Gasser, S.M., 2009. Silent chromatin at the middle and ends: lessons from yeasts.

TE D

257

chromosomes in triticales. Theor. Appl. Genet. 63, 235-244.

EMBO J. 28, 2149-2161.

Dalal, Y., Furuyama, T., Vermaak, D., Henikoff, S., 2007. Structure, dynamics, and evolution of centromeric nucleosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15974-15981. Dong, Q.H., Han, F.P., 2012. Phosphorylation of histone H2A is associated with centromere

EP

256

Appels, R., Gustafson, J.P., May, C.E., 1982. Structural variation in the heterochromatin of rye

function and maintenance in meiosis. Plant J. 71, 800-809. Fajkus, J., Sýkorová, E., Leitch, A.R., 2005. Telomeres in evolution and evolution of telomeres.

AC C

255

Chromosome Res. 13, 469-479. Francki, M.G., 2001. Identification of Bilby, a diverged centromeric Ty1-copia retrotransposon family from cereal rye (Secale cereale L.). Genome 44, 266-274.

267

Fu, S.L., Gao, Z., Birchler, J.A., Han, F.P., 2012. Dicentric chromosome formation and

268

epigenetics of centromere formation in plants. J. Genet. Genomics. 39, 125-130.

269

Fu, S.L., Lv, Z.L., Gao, Z., Wu, H.J., Pang, J.L., Zhang, B., Dong, Q.H., Xiang Guo, X.,

270

Wang,X.J., Birchler, J.A., Han, F.P., 2013. De novo centromere formation on a

271

chromosome fragment in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. doi/10.1073/pnas.1303944110.

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

272 273 274

Gao, Z., Fu, S., Dong, Q., Han, F., Brichler, J., 2011. Inactivation of a centromere during the formation of a translocation in maize. Chromosome Res. 19, 755-761. Guerra, M., Cabral, G., Cuacos, M., Gonzalez-Garcia, M., Gonzalez-Sanchez M., Vega, J., Puertas M.J., 2010. Neocentrics and holokinetics (holocentrics): chromosomes out of the

276

centromeric rules. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 129, 82-96.

RI PT

275

Gustafson, J.P., Lukaszewski, A.J., Bennett, M.D., 1983. Somatic deletion and redistribution of

278

telomeric heterochromatin in the genus Secale and in Triticale. Chromosoma 88, 293-298.

279

Hadlaczky, G.., Praznovszky, T., Cserpán, I., Keresö, J., Péterfy, M., Kelemen, I., Atalay, E.,

280

Szeles, A., Szelei, J., Tubak, V., Burg, K., 1991. Centromere formation in mouse cells

281

cotransformed with human DNA and a dominant marker gene. Proc. Nalt. Acad. Sci. USA

282

88, 8106-8110.

Han, F. P., Lamb, J.C., Birchler, J.A., 2006. High frequency of centromere inactivation

M AN U

283

SC

277

284

resulting in stable dicentric chromosomes of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3238-

285

3243.

286 287 288

Han, F.P., Gao, Z., Yu, W.C., Birchler, J.A., 2007. Minichromosome analysis of chromosome paring, disjunction, and sister chromatid cohesion in maize. Plant Cell 19, 3853-3863. Han, F.P., Gao, Z., Birchler, J.A., 2009. Reactivation of an inactive centromere reveals epigenetic and structural components for centromere specification in maize. Plant Cell 21,

290

1929-1939.

291

TE D

289

Heckmann, S., Schroeder-Reiter, E., Kumke, K., Ma, L., Nagaki, K., Murata, M., Wanner, G., Houben, A., 2011. Holocentric chromosomes of Luzula elegans are characterized by a

293

longitudinal centromere groove, chromosome bending, and a terminal nucleolus organizer

294

region. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 134, 220-228.

296

Heit, R., Underhill, D.A., Chan, G., Hendzel, M.J., 2006. Epigenetic regulation of centromere formation and kinetochore function. Biochem. Cell Biol. 84, 605-618.

AC C

295

EP

292

297

Heller, R., Brown, K.E., Burgtorf, C., Brown, W.R.A., 1996. Mini-chromosomes derived from

298

the human Y chromosome by telomere directed chromosome breakage. Proc. Natl. Acad.

299

Sci. USA 93, 7125-7130.

300 301 302 303 304 305

Henikoff, S., Ahmad, K., Malik, H.S., 2001. The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 293, 1098-1102. Hiatt, E.N., Kentner, E.K., Dawe, R.K., 2002. Independently regulated neocentromere activity of two classes of tandem repeat arrays. Plant Cell 14, 407-420. Houben, A., Schubert, I., 2003. DNA and proteins of plant centromeres. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6, 554-560. 10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

306

Jiang, B., Lou, Q.F., Wang, D., Wu, Z.M., Zhang W.P., Chen, J.F., 2011. Allopolyploidization

307

induced the activation of Ty1-copia retrotransposons in Cucumis hytivus, a newly formed

308

Cucumis allotetraploid. Bot. Stud. 52, 145-152. Kato, A., Zheng, Y.Z., Auger, D. L., Phelps-Durr, T., Bauer M. J., Lamb, J.C., Birchler, J.A.,

310

2005. Minichromosomes derived from the B chromosome of maize. Cytogenet. Genome

311

Res. 109, 156-165.

312

RI PT

309

Kynast, R.G., Friebe, B., Gill, B.S., 2000. Fate of multicentric and ring chromosomes induced

313

by a new gametocidal factor located on chromosome 4Mg of Aegilops geniculata.

314

Chromosome Res. 8, 133-139.

Lapitan, N.L.V., Sears, R.G., Gill, B.S., 1984. Translocations and other karyotypic structural

SC

315

changes in wheat × rye hybrids regenerated from tissue culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 68, 547-

317

554.

318

M AN U

316

Liu, Z., Yue, W., Li, D., Wang, R.R., Kong, X., Lu, K., Wang, G., Dong, Y., Jin, W., Zhang,

319

X., 2008. Structure and dynamics of retrotransposons at wheat centromeres and

320

pericentromeres. Chromosoma 117, 445-456.

324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335

Lukaszewski, A.J., Gustafson, J.P., 1983. Translocations and modifications of chromosomes in triticale × wheat hybrids. Theor. Appl. Genet. 64, 239-248.

TE D

323

wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genetics 140, 1069-1085.

Ma, J.X., Wing, R.A., Bennetzen, J.L., Jackson, S.A., 2007. Plant centromere organization: a dynamic structure with conserved functions. Trends Genet. 23, 134-139. Masonbrink, R.E., Fu,S.L., Han, F.P., Birchler, J.A., 2013. Heritable loss of replication control of a minichromosome derived from the B chromosome of maize. Genetics 193, 77-84.

EP

322

Lukaszewski, A.J., 1995 Chromatid and chromosome type breakage-fusion-bridge cycles in

McClintock, B., 1941. The stability of broken ends of chromosomes in Zea mays. Genetics 26, 234-282.

AC C

321

McClintock, B., 1978. Mechanisms that rapidly reorganize the genome. Stadler. Genet. Symp. 10, 25-48.

McIntyre, C.L., Pereira, S., Moran, L.B., Appels, R., 1990. New Secale cereale (rye) DNA derivatives for the detection of rye chromosome segments in wheat. Genome 33, 635-640. Metcalfe, C.J., Bulazel, K.V., Ferreri, G.C., Schroeder-Reiter, E., Wanner, G., Rens, W.,

336

Obergfell, C., Eldridge, M.D., O'Neill, R.J., 2007. Genomic instability within centromeres of

337

interspecific marsupial hybrids. Genetics 177, 2507-2517.

338 339

Miller, J.T., Dong, F.G., Jackson, S.A., Song, J.Q., Jiang, J.M., 1998. Retrotransposon-related DNA sequences in the centromeres of grass chromosomes. Genetics 150, 1615-1623. 11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

340

Nagaki, K., Song, J., Stupar, R.M., Parokonny, A.S., Yuan, Q.P., Ouyang, S., Liu, J., Hsiao, J.,

341

Jones, K.M., Dawe, R.K., Buell, C.R., Jiang, J., 2003. Molecular and cytological analyses of

342

large tracks of centromeric DNA reveal the structure and evolutionary dynamics of maize

343

centromeres. Genetics 163, 759-770.

345

Nasuda, S., Hudakova, S., Schubert, I., Houben, A., Endo, T.R., 2005. Stable barley

RI PT

344

chromosomes without centromeric repeats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9842-9847.

346

Neumann, P., Navrátilová, A., Schroeder-Reiter, E., Koblížková, A., Steinbauerová, V.,

347

Chocholová, E., Novák, P., Wanner, G., Macas, J., 2012 Stretching the rules: monocentric

349 350

chromosomes with multiple centromere domains. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002777.

Novello, A., Villar, S., 2006. Chromosome plasticity in Ctenomys (Rodentia Octodontidae):

SC

348

chromosome 1 evolution and heterochromatin variation. Genetica 127, 303-309. Page, S.L., Shaffer, L.G., 1998. Chromosome stability is maintained by short intercentromeric

352

distance in functionally dicentric human Robertsonian translocations. Chromosome Res. 6,

353

115-122.

354 355

M AN U

351

Paweletz, N., Vig, B.K., Finze, E.M., 1989. Evolution of compound centromeres: a new phenomenon. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 42, 75-86.

Pearce, S.R., Pich, U., Harrison, G., Flavell, A.J., Heslop-Harrison, J.S., Schubert, I., Kumar,

357

A., 1996. The Ty1-copia group retrotransposons of Allium cepa are distributed throughout

358

the chromosomes but are enriched in the terminal heterochromatin. Chromosome Res. 4,

359

357-364.

361 362

Rayburn, A.L., Gill, B.S., 1986. Molecular identification of the D-genome chromosomes of wheat. J. Hered. 77, 253-255.

Scheinker, V.S., Lozovskaya, E.R., Bishop, J.G., Corces, V.G., Evgen'ev, M.B., 1990. A long

EP

360

TE D

356

terminal repeat-containing retrotransposon is mobilized during hybrid dysgenesis in

364

Drosophila virilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 9615-9619.

365 366

AC C

363

Schubert, I., Lysak, M.A., 2011. Interpretation of karyotype evolution should consider chromosome structural constraints. Trends Genet. 27, 207-216.

367

Sears, E. R., 1946. Isochromosomes and telocentrics in Triticum vulgare. Genetics 31, 229-230.

368

Sears, E. R., Camara, A., 1952. A transmissible dicentric chromosome. Genetics 37, 125-135.

369

Tittel-Elmer, M., Bucher, E., Broger, L., Mathieu, O., Paszkowski, J., Vaillant I., 2010. Stress-

370 371

induced activation of heterochromatic transcription. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001175. Vershinin, A.V., Schwarzacher, T., Heslop-Harrison, J.S., 1995. The large-scale genomic

372

organization of repetitive DNA families at the telomeres of rye chromosomes. Plant Cell 7,

373

1823-1833. 12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

374

Wang, Y.B., Hu, H., Snape, J.W., 1995. Spontaneous wheat/rye translocations from female

375

meiotic products of hybrids between octoploid triticale and wheat. Euphytica 81, 265-270.

376

Yu, W.C., Han, F.P., Gao, Z., Vega, J.M., Birchler, J.A., 2007. Construction and behavior of

378

engineered minichromosomes in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8924-8929. Zhang, W., Friebe, B., Gill, B.S., Jiang, J., 2010. Centromere inactivation and epigenetic

RI PT

377

379

modifications of a plant chromosome with three functional centromeres. Chromosoma 119,

380

553 563.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

381

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

382

FIGURE LEGENDS

383

Fig. 1. Formation of dicentric chromosome and multicentromere in the self progeny of the 3RCI

385

disomic addition line.

386

A: GISH and FISH using rye genomic DNA (green) and CRW (red) as probes to identify the

387

dicentric chromosome (arrow). B: GISH and FISH using rye genomic DNA (green) and CRW

388

(red) as probes to detect the dicentric chromosome two months after planting. Arrows indicate

389

the broken chromosomal arms from the dicentric chromosome. C: GISH and FISH using rye

390

genomic DNA (green) and CRW (red) as probes to revealed a multicentromeric chromosome

391

(arrow). D: immunolocalization of H2AThr133ph. Arrow indicates active centromeres. Bars =

392

10 µm.

SC

RI PT

384

393

Fig. 2. Variation of terminal heterochromatin in the self progeny of the 3RCI disomic addition

395

line.

396

A, C and E: GISH and FISH using rye genomic DNA (green) and CRW (red) as probes to

397

detect the terminal heterochromatin on 3RS chromosome. B, D and F: FISH using pSc119.2

398

(green) and pSc200 (red) to probe the same cell as in (A), (C) and (E). Arrows in (A) and (B)

399

indicate the 3RS with normal telomeric heterochromatin at the end of the chromosome 3RS.

400

Arrows in (C) and (D) indicate the 3RS arm with re-positioned telomeric heterochromatin and

401

the repetitive sequences pSc119.2 and pSc200. Arrows in (E) and (F) indicate the deletion of

402

terminal heterochromatin from the chromosome 3RS accompanied by loss of pSc119.2 and

403

pSc200 signals. Bars = 10 µm.

TE D

EP

404

M AN U

394

Fig. 3. Variation of terminal heterochromatin in the selfed progeny of 5RS ditelosomic addition

406

line (MK5RSdite).

407

A: chromosome fragment with terminal heterochromatin in subterminal position (arrow) as

408

detected by GISH and FISH with rye genomic DNA (green) and CRW (red). B: FISH using

409

pSc119.2 and pAs1 to probe the same cell as in (A). Arrow indicates the pSc119.2 signal at the

410

subterminal region. C: a chromosome fragment with terminal heterochromatin at subterminal

411

region (arrow) and a minichromosome without terminal heterochromatin (indicated by pointer)

412

were detected by GISH and FISH using rye genomic DNA (green) and CRW (red) as probes.

413

D: FISH with pSc119.2 and pAs1 to probe the same cell as in (C). Arrow indicates the

414

pSc119.2 signal at the subterminal region. Pointer indicates the minichromosome without

415

pSc119.2 signal. Bars = 10 µm.

AC C

405

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

416

Fig. 4. Minichromosomes in the self progeny of the 4R monosomic addition line (MK4Rmon).

418

A: GISH and FISH using rye genomic DNA (green) and CRW (red) as probes to detect the

419

minichromosomes in wheat line MK4Rmon-mini (arrows). B−E: FISH using CRW (red) and

420

wheat telomeric DNA (green) as probes to characterise the minichromosomes. Arrows indicate

421

the minichromosomes with or without telomere signal. F: immunostaining of centromere-

422

specific CENH3 (arrow) on the minichromosome. Bars = 10 µm.

423

RI PT

417

Fig. 5. Minichromosome and multicentromere in the self progeny of the 6R/6D substitution

425

line.

426

A: minichromosome (arrow) was detected by FISH using CRW (red) and pAWRC.1 (green) as

427

probes. B: small ring chromosome with two rye centromeres (arrow) as detected by FISH using

428

CRW (red) and pAWRC.1 (green) as probes. C: small ring chromosome with four rye

429

centromeres (arrow) as detected by FISH using CRW (red) and pAWRC.1 (green) as probes.

430

D: multicentromeric chromosome (arrow) detected by FISH using CRW (red) and pAWRC.1

431

(green) as probes. E: GISH with rye genomic DNA applied to the same cell as in (D). Arrow

432

indicates the multicentromeric chromosome. F: GISH with rye genomic DNA applied to the

433

same cell as in (C). Arrow indicates the small ring chromosome with four rye centromeres.

434

Bars = 10 µm.

M AN U

TE D

435

SC

424

Fig. 6. Model for the formation of ring dicentric and tetracentric chromosomes, as well as of

437

minichromosomes within the 6R/6D substitution line.

AC C

438

EP

436

15

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT