- Email: [email protected]
American Academy of Otolaryngology&Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology– Head and Neck Surgery October 2003
310 CHESTER and STEWART
8. Thompson DM, Maragos NE, Edwards BW. The study of vocal fold vibratory patterns in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis before and after type I thyroplasty with or without arytenoids adduction. Laryngoscope 1995;105:481-6. 9. Pou AM, Carrau RL, Eibling DE, et al. Laryngeal framework surgery for the management of aspiration in high vagal lesions. Am J Otolaryngol 1998;19:1-7. 10. Slavit DH, Maragos NE. Arytenoid adduction and type I thyroplasty in the treatment of aphonia. J Voice 1994;8:8491. 11. Netterville JL, Stone RE, Luken ES, et al. Silastic medialization and arytenoid adduction: the Vanderbilt experience. A review of 116 phonosurgical procedures. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102:413-24.
12. Kraus DH, Orlikoff RF, Rizk SS, et al. Arytenoid adduction as an adjunct to type I thyroplasty for unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Head Neck 1999;21:52-9. 13. Beilamowicz S, Berke GS, Gerratt BR. A comparison of type I thyroplasty and arytenoid adduction. J Voice 1995; 9:466-72. 14. Slavit DH, Maragos NE. Physiologic assessment of arytenoid adduction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;101:321-7. 15. Weinman EC, Maragos NE. Airway compromise in thyroplasty surgery. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1082-5. 16. Gray SD, Barkmeier J, Jones D, et al. Vocal evaluation of thyroplasty surgery in the treatment of unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Laryngoscope 1992;102:415-21. 17. Koufman JR. Laryngoplasty for vocal cord medialization: an alternative to Teflon. Laryngoscope 1986;96:726-31.
American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Annual Meetings 2004 2005 2006
New York, New York Los Angeles, California Toronto, Ontario, Canada
September 19-22 September 25-28 September 17-20
310 CHESTER and STEWART
8. Thompson DM, Maragos NE, Edwards BW. The study of vocal fold vibratory patterns in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis before and after type I thyroplasty with or without arytenoids adduction. Laryngoscope 1995;105:481-6. 9. Pou AM, Carrau RL, Eibling DE, et al. Laryngeal framework surgery for the management of aspiration in high vagal lesions. Am J Otolaryngol 1998;19:1-7. 10. Slavit DH, Maragos NE. Arytenoid adduction and type I thyroplasty in the treatment of aphonia. J Voice 1994;8:8491. 11. Netterville JL, Stone RE, Luken ES, et al. Silastic medialization and arytenoid adduction: the Vanderbilt experience. A review of 116 phonosurgical procedures. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102:413-24.
12. Kraus DH, Orlikoff RF, Rizk SS, et al. Arytenoid adduction as an adjunct to type I thyroplasty for unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Head Neck 1999;21:52-9. 13. Beilamowicz S, Berke GS, Gerratt BR. A comparison of type I thyroplasty and arytenoid adduction. J Voice 1995; 9:466-72. 14. Slavit DH, Maragos NE. Physiologic assessment of arytenoid adduction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;101:321-7. 15. Weinman EC, Maragos NE. Airway compromise in thyroplasty surgery. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1082-5. 16. Gray SD, Barkmeier J, Jones D, et al. Vocal evaluation of thyroplasty surgery in the treatment of unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Laryngoscope 1992;102:415-21. 17. Koufman JR. Laryngoplasty for vocal cord medialization: an alternative to Teflon. Laryngoscope 1986;96:726-31.
American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Annual Meetings 2004 2005 2006
New York, New York Los Angeles, California Toronto, Ontario, Canada
September 19-22 September 25-28 September 17-20