Amygdalar volumetric correlates of social anxiety in offspring of parents with bipolar disorder

Amygdalar volumetric correlates of social anxiety in offspring of parents with bipolar disorder

Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 234 (2015) 252–258 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging journal homepage: w...

466KB Sizes 0 Downloads 85 Views

Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 234 (2015) 252–258

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/psychresns

Amygdalar volumetric correlates of social anxiety in offspring of parents with bipolar disorder Min-Hyeon Park a, Amy Garrett b, Spencer Boucher b, Meghan Howe b, Erica Sanders b, Eunjoo Kim c, Manpreet Singh b, Kiki Chang b,n a

Department of Psychiatry, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, South Korea Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA c Department of Psychiatry and Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea b

art ic l e i nf o Article history: Received 15 June 2014 Received in revised form 17 September 2015 Accepted 25 September 2015 Available online 28 September 2015 Keywords: Risk Affect Child Adolescence Family

a b s t r a c t The prevalence of social anxiety disorder is high in offspring of parents with bipolar disorder (BD) and anxiety may be a significant risk factor in these youth for developing BD. We compared social anxiety symptoms between BD offspring with mood symptoms (high-risk group for developing BD I or II: HR) and healthy controls (HC). We also explored the correlations between the amygdalar volumes and social anxiety symptoms in the HR group with high social anxiety scores (HRHSA) due to the potential involvement of the amygdala in the pathophysiology of both BD and social anxiety. Youth participating in the study included 29 h and 17 HC of comparable age and gender. To assess social anxiety symptoms, we used the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC) social anxiety subscale. The HR group's MASC social anxiety score was significantly higher than that of the HC group. Among the 29 h, 17 subjects (58.6%) showed high social anxiety and they were classified as the HRHSA group. No significant difference was observed in amygdalar volume between the HRHSA and HC groups. However, there were significant negative correlations between amydalar volumes and MASC social anxiety score in the HRHSA group. These findings have implications for the link between amygdalar structure and both anxiety and mood control. This link may serve to implicate high social anxiety as a risk marker for future BD development. & 2015 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

1. Introduction Offspring of parents with bipolar disorder (BD) are at high risk for mood disorder, including BD, and also anxiety disorders (Birmaher et al., 2009). Among different anxiety disorders, the prevalence of social anxiety disorder is remarkably high, along with generalized anxiety disorder, in BD offspring (Birmaher et al., 2009; Duffy et al., 2013). Regardless of the high prevalence rate, social anxiety disorder itself is clinically important in that it may be a significant risk factor for developing mood disorders in BD offspring and for suicide in patients with BD (Duffy et al., 2013). Several functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of social anxiety disorder have suggested that abnormal brain activity in the amygdala might be involved in the pathophysiology n Correspondence to: Stanford University School of Medicine, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94305-5719, USA. Fax: þ1 650 723 5531. E-mail address: [email protected] (K. Chang).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.09.018 0925-4927/& 2015 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

of social anxiety disorder (Birbaumer et al., 1998; Blair et al., 2008; Campbell et al., 2007; Cooney et al., 2006; Gentili et al., 2008; Guyer et al., 2008; Marcinkiewcz et al., 2009; Phan et al., 2006; Schneider et al., 1999; Shah et al., 2009; Stein et al., 2002; Straube et al., 2004; Straube et al., 2005; Yoon et al., 2007). Although, social anxiety pathophysiology has a particularly close relationship with the amygdala (Rauch et al., 2003), to our knowledge only three studies, all in adults, have examined the correlation between amygdalar volume and the degree of social anxiety symptoms, and the results of those studies were inconsistent (Irle et al., 2010; Machado-de-Sousa et al., 2014; Syal et al., 2012). As BD youth have been shown to have decreased amygdalar volumes (Blumberg et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2005; DelBello et al., 2004; Dickstein et al., 2005; Pfeifer et al., 2008), and as social anxiety symptoms are a risk factor for BD offspring for developing BD (Duffy et al., 2013), we hypothesized that social anxiety could be correlated with the amygdalar volumetric alterations in BD offspring. Therefore, in this study we aimed to 1) compare social anxiety symptoms between BD offspring with subthreshold mood

M.-H. Park et al. / Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 234 (2015) 252–258

symptoms and who are thus at high risk for developing BD I or II (high-risk group: HR) and healthy controls (HCs), 2) compare amygdalar volume between the HR subjects with high social anxiety (HRHSA) and the HC group, and 3) explore the correlation between amygdalar volume and social anxiety symptoms in the HRHSA group.

2. Method 2.1. Subjects and assessment The protocol was approved by the Stanford University Panel of Medical Research in Human Subjects. Families were recruited from the Stanford Adult Bipolar Disorders Clinic, the Stanford Pediatric Bipolar Disorders Program, physician referrals, local adult bipolar support groups, and the surrounding community and this study was conducted at the Stanford University Department of Psychiatry. Thirty-five BD offspring and 20 HCs were recruited for the initial assessment. Written and oral informed consent was obtained from at least one parent, and written and oral assent was obtained from the youth. Parental diagnosis of BD I or II was confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID) (First et al., 1995). When available, the other parent was also evaluated for psychopathology in this manner. Family history in all other relatives was obtained using the Family History–Research Diagnostic Criteria (FH-RDC) (Andreasen et al., 1977). Youth were assessed by the affective module of the Washington University in St. Louis Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (WASH-UKSADS) (Geller et al., 2001) and the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children–Present and Lifetime (KSADS-PL). All subjects were evaluated either by a child psychiatrist (MS or KC) or trained masters-level research assistant (MH), who were aware of parental diagnosis. Inter-rater reliability was established by rating videotaped interviews, observing a trained rater, observing trained rater interviews, and performing interviews with observation by a trained rater (kappa40.9). Current and lifetime DSM-IV diagnoses were ultimately determined by a board certified child psychiatrist (KC) based on personal interview, discussion with the research assistant, and written notes of responses to individual questions. We assessed current manic symptom severity using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) (Young et al., 1978) and depression symptom severity using the Children's Depression Rating Scale– Revised (CDRS-R) (Poznanski et al., 1985). The inclusion criteria for the HR group were being 9–17 years of age, having a biological parent with bipolar I or II disorder and having subthreshold mood symptoms (YMRS412 or CDRS427). BD offspring with the following disorders or conditions were excluded from the HR group: BD I or II, pervasive developmental disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), panic disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Tourette's syndrome, substance use disorders, or neurological conditions (such as a seizure disorder).After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 29 BD offspring were included in the HR group. Within the HR group, those who showed higher social anxiety than the upper limit of normal (MASC social anxiety T score455) were classified as the HRHSA group. Healthy controls (HC) were similarly interviewed, and determined to have no DSM-IV diagnoses, were not taking psychotropic medications, had both parents without any psychiatric diagnosis (determined by the SCID), did not have a first- or seconddegree relative with BD as determined by the FH-RDC, and were excluded with current YMRS scores greater than 8 or CDRS-R greater than 26. After applying these exclusion criteria, 17 youths were left for statistical analysis as the HC group.

253

2.2. Multidimensional anxiety scale for children (MASC) social anxiety subscale To assess social anxiety symptoms, we used the MASC social anxiety scale (March et al., 1997). This scale is comprised of 9 items. A T-score of 45 to 55 is considered normal range. The MASC social anxiety subscale was found to be significantly predictive of the presence and severity of social anxiety disorder (Wei et al., 2014) and the validity of this scale is comparable to that of well-established measures of social anxiety disorder (Anderson et al., 2009). 2.3. MRI acquisition Subjects were scanned on a 3T GE Signa scanner using a custombuilt head coil. Functional MRI data were collected with thirty axial slices (4 mm thick,.5 mm skip), parallel to the axis of anterior and posterior commissures, covering the entire brain (FOV¼20 cm, 64  64 matrix, inplane spatial resolution¼3.43 mm). A spiral inout pulse sequence 35 (Glover and Lai, 1998) used the following parameters: TR¼2000 ms, TE¼30 ms, flip angle¼80° and one interleave. An individually calculated high-order shim was used to reduce B0 heterogeneity prior to acquiring the functional scans. To aid with normalization, a 3D high resolution T1-weighted image was acquired using a fast spoiled gradient recall (FSPGR) pulse sequence: TR/TI /TE¼5.9/1.5/300 ms, flip angle¼15°, field of view¼ 22 cm, 256  256 matrix, inplane resolution¼0.86 mm2, and slice thickness¼1.5 mm (Barnea-Goraly et al., 2014; Hoeft et al., 2014; Weems et al., 2013). 2.4. Image analysis Subcortical volumetric segmentation of the amygdalas was performed with the Freesurfer image analysis suite, a semi-automated volumetric analysis pipeline which is documented and freely available for download online (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.har vard.edu/). The technical details of these procedures are described in prior publications (Dale et al., 1999; Fischl et al., 2002). Before the Freesurfer analysis, we applied an image bias correction using SPM8 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm), with a 30 mm full-width half-maximum Gaussian smoothing kernel and an extremely light regularization coefficient of.0001. Total tissue volume was also calculated using SPM8. All subcortical segmentations were visually inspected and manually edited for quality by one reviewer (SB). Four baseline subcortical segmentations required editing: 3 patients and 7 healthy controls. The analysis results in measures of total amygdala volume (left plus right hemispheres).These edits included removing non-brain voxels from the amygdala region of interest. ROI inspection and editing were performed blind to group. The final outputs of the FreeSurfer analysis are left and right amygdala volume. 2.5. Statistical analyses The χ 2 test and independent t test were conducted to compare the categorical and continuous variables to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of both groups. Beta correlation coefficients, controlling for age, gender and total brain volume (TBV), YMRS score and CDRS-R score were calculated to examine the correlation between anxiety symptoms and the morphometric regions of interest (ROIs) by using linear regression. The statistical significance for all tests was set at p o 0.05. In cases in which it is assumed that statistical significance was not reached because the number of subjects was insufficient, we calculated effect sizes based on the difference in the means divided by the mean

254

M.-H. Park et al. / Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 234 (2015) 252–258

standard deviation (Cohen's d) (Cohen, 1977, 1988).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants.

3. Results Twenty-nine HR offspring (mean age: 13.9 years (S.D. 3.1) M¼ 18, F¼11) and 17 HC(mean age: 14.4 years (S.D. 2.4) M ¼8, F¼9) were included as subjects for statistical analysis. Table 1 shows demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants. The MASC social anxiety score of the HR group was significantly higher than that of the HC group (p o0.0001, Table 1). The YMRS and CDRS-R scores of the HR group were significantly higher than those of the HC group as well (p o0.0001, Table 1). No significant difference was observed in amygdalar volume between the HR and HC groups. Among the total of 29 h subjects, 17 (58.6%) showed high social anxiety and they were classified as HRHSA. No significant difference was observed in amygdalar volume between the HRHSA and HC groups (Table 2). However, when we calculated effect sizes for the amygdala volume differences between the HRHSA and HC groups, moderate effect sizes were observed (total amygdala:d ¼  0.42, left amygdala:d ¼  0.50, right amygdala: d ¼ 0.35) (Cohen, 1988). To avoid possible confound, we controlled for age, gender, TBV, YMRS score and CDRS-R score, and there was no significant correlation between amygdalar volume and MASC social anxiety scale in either the HR or HC group. However, after excluding the subjects who had MASC social anxiety scores in the normal range, when we examined the correlation between amydalar volumes and MASC social anxiety score in the HRHSA group, significant negative correlations were observed (controlling for age, gender, TBV, YMRS score and CDRS-R score: total amygdala: ß ¼  0.742, p ¼0.004, left amygdala: ß ¼  0.727, p ¼0.016, right amygdala: ß ¼ 0.672, p ¼0.002 )(Fig. 1, Table 3). Some of the HRHSA group (9 of 17, 52.9%) had been exposed to medication: 4 to lamotrigine, 3 to antidepressants, 2 to lithium, 1 to aripiprazole, 3 to methylphenidate, 1 to atomoxetine (These numbers include patients on multiple medications.). However, when we compared amygdalar volume of the HRHSA group with and without lithium or antipsychotic exposure, there was no difference observed.

4. Discussion We found that BD offspring with mood dysregulation have significantly higher levels of social anxiety than healthy controls. We also found significant negative correlations between amygdalar volumes and social anxiety symptoms in the BD offspring at high risk who had elevated symptoms of social anxiety. By excluding the subjects with PTSD, OCD, or panic disorder and by controlling for YMRS score and CDRS-R score, we minimized the effect of other anxiety and mood symptoms. By doing the aforementioned method, we tried to concentrate mainly on social anxiety symptoms. 4.1. The amygdala and anxiety, focusing on social anxiety Among the anxiety disorders, social anxiety pathophysiology has a particularly close relationship with the amygdala (Rauch et al., 2003). The amygdala is one of the crucial brain regions that play a role in social cognition (Adolphs, 2010), and previous fMRI studies have shown that the amygdala is the most hyper-activated brain area when subjects are exposed to threat-signaling faces (Sergerie et al., 2008). Interestingly, a meta-analysis showed that amygdalar hyper-activations were more noticeable in patients with social anxiety disorder than those with other anxiety

Age Gender Race MASC Social anxiety YMRS CDRS-R BD diagnosis

High-risk group (N ¼ 29)

Healthy controls (N ¼ 17)

p-value

mean (S.D.) male (%) Non-caucasian (%) T score (S.D.)

13.9 (3.1) 18 (62.1) 2 (7.0)

14.4 (2.4) 8 (47.1) 5 (29.4)

0.604 0.369 0.083

55.2 (11.8)

45.2 (7.0)

o0.00001

mean (S.D.) mean (S.D.)

11.1 (5.9) 34.4(8.5)

2.0 (2.9) 20.1 (7.0)

o0.00001 o0.00001

BD.NOS (%)

7 (24.1%)

0

Comorbidity ADHD (%) ODD (%) CD (%) GAD (%) Separation anxiety disorder (%)

13 4 1 5 1

(44.8%) (13.8%) (3.5) (17.2) (3.5)

MASC, Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children. YMRS, Young Mania Rating Scale. CDRS-R, Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised. BD, Bipolar disorder. NOS, not otherwise specified. ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. ODD, oppositional defiant disorder. CD, conduct disorder. GAD, generalized anxiety disorder.

disorders even including PTSD (Etkin and Wager, 2007). Considering that patients with social anxiety are particularly sensitive to threat-signaling faces, which can be interpreted as showing dislike or hostility (Arrais et al., 2009), there is the possibility that social anxiety disorder is more closely related to amygdalar abnormalities than are other anxiety disorders (Freitas-Ferrari et al., 2008). However, regarding brain structural studies, as far as we know, only three previous studies compared the amygdalar volumes of individuals with social anxiety disorder exclusively among anxiety disorders to those of controls. Results among these studies were inconsistent, with both increased (Machado-de-Sousa et al., 2014) and, decreased (Irle et al., 2010) volume in those with social anxiety disorder, as well as findings of no differences between groups (Syal et al., 2012). Limitations of these studies included the relatively small sample sizes (social anxiety patients vs healthy controls: 12 vs 12 (Machado-de-Sousa et al., 2014), 13 vs 13 (Syal et al., 2012), and 24 vs 24 (Irle et al., 2010) respectively). Interestingly, among these studies, the mean age of participants in the study by Irle et al. (2010), which reported a decreased amygdala volume in social anxiety patients, was approximately 10 years older than those of the other two studies, and the study found a correlation between the social anxiety symptom severity and the degree of volume reduction, whereas the other two studies did not examine this relationship. Furthermore, the study by Syal et al. (2012),which assessed cortical thickness and subcortical volumes, reported negative findings regarding amygdalar volume. However, when the data were examined at an uncorrected level, a decreased amygdalar volume was observed in the social anxiety patients. Taking together the results of previous studies with our result of the negative correlation between social anxiety symptoms and amygdala volume in this study, as well as and the fact that our participants were much younger than those of previous studies, it will be interesting to conduct more studies to assess whether the amygdala volume change progresses with prolonged social anxiety symptoms.

M.-H. Park et al. / Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 234 (2015) 252–258

255

Table 2 Mean (SD) brain regional raw volumes (in cubic centimeters) in high-risk group with high social anxiety and healthy controls. Brain region Volume (cm 3) Healthy controls (S.D.) (N¼ 26) High-risk group (S.D.) (N ¼ 17) p-valuea High-risk group with high social anxiety (S.D.) (N ¼ 17)

p-valueb

Total brain volume Total amygdalar volume Left amygdalar volume Right amygdalar volume

0.474 0.178 0.099 0.344

a b

1349.58 3.09 1.52 1.57

(93.19) (0.33) (0.12) (0.23)

1322.96 2.95 1.46 1.49

(111.59) (0.46) (0.26) (0.22)

0.412 0.282 0.355 0.264

1324.13 2.93 1.43 1.50

(110.70) (0.36) (0.20) (0.18)

High-risk group vs. Healthy control. High-risk group with high social anxiety vs. Healthy control.

4.2. Pediatric BD, BD offspring and the amygdala Previous fMRI studies in pediatric BD have demonstrated hyperactivity in the amygdala when performing affective tasks (Olsavsky et al., 2012; Rich et al., 2006). Also some fMRI studies on BD offspring have demonstrated amygdalar hyperactivity as well (Olsavsky et al., 2012). Even though amygdala volumetric findings in adults with BD are inconsistent (Altshuler et al., 1998; Blumberg et al., 2003; Pearlson et al., 1997; Strakowski et al., 1999; Swayze et al., 1992), amygdala findings in pediatric BD are more consistent and the majority found decreased amygdalar volume (Blumberg et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2005; DelBello et al., 2004; Dickstein

Table 3 Correlations between amygdalar volumes and the MASC social anxiety score. in the high-risk group with high social anxiety (n ¼17)

Total amygdalar volume Left amygdalar volume Right amygdalar volume

ß

P

 0.742  0.727  0.672

0.004 0.016 0.002

corrected by age, gender,total brain volume, YMRS score and CDRS-R score.

Fig. 1. Correlations between amygdalar volumes and social anxiety symptoms. Total amygdala (a) (ß¼  .742, p¼ .004), (b) Left amygdala (ß¼  .727, p ¼ .016) and (c) Right amygdala (ß ¼  .672, p ¼ .002).

256

M.-H. Park et al. / Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 234 (2015) 252–258

et al., 2005; Pfeifer et al., 2008). However, previous volumetric studies on BD offspring have reported normal amygdalar volumes (Hajek et al., 2009; Karchemskiy et al., 2011; Ladouceur et al., 2008; Singh et al., 2008). In this study, we also did not find volumetric differences in the amygdala between the HR and HC groups. In addition, we were not able to predict any trend of decreased amygdalar volume in the portion of HR group without high social anxiety. On the other hand, when we examined the HRHSA group, decreased amygdalar volume trends compared to the HC group were observed and there were correlations between social anxiety symptoms and amygdalar volumes. There are two hypotheses regarding the causal relationship between BD development and amygdalar volumetric change. That is, it has been debated whether amygdalar volume abnormality predates the onset of mania, or the volumetric changes occur as a consequence of prolonged BD. The latter hypothesis has been viewed as more reliable (Karchemskiy et al., 2011) because while decreased amygdalar volume is observed in youth with BD, no such volumetric finding was observed in healthy or mood dysregulated BD offspring overall. However, the results of the present study of decreased volume trends in the HRHSA group compared with the HC group and the negative correlations between amygdalar volumes and MASC social anxiety scores in the HRHSA group may suggest the possibility that BD offspring with mood dysregulation who also have high levels of social anxiety might tend to already have smaller amygdalar volumes. However, we cannot confirm this due to the lack of a statistically significant volume difference between the HRHSA and HC groups and the small sample size. 4.3. BD offspring and social anxiety Masi et al. (2001) reported that social anxiety disorder is the second most common anxiety disorder comorbidity in child & adolescent BD after OCD. In the aforementioned study, social anxiety disorder showed the earliest onset age (except for separation anxiety disorder), which was 6.5 years earlier than that of BD. Previous studies on BD offspring have also suggested that anxiety symptoms, including social anxiety symptoms, in BD offspring may serve as a route for developing BD (Contreras et al., 2010). Taking the result of this study together with the results of previous studies (which revealed that pediatric BD patients have decreased amygdalar volume), one could conclude that high social anxiety in BD may be a risk marker for future BD development. In this study, only 4 subjects in the HRHSA group met the diagnostic criteria of BD NOS and no subject met BD I or II criteria yet. Additionally, it is not known whether the subjects who met the diagnostic criteria of BD NOS will eventually develop BD I or II, although previous studies indicated that a substantial number of youth with BD NOS progress to meet the full criteria for BD I or II (Adolphs, 2010). Therefore, the volumetric changes related to social anxiety symptoms may represent the start of the most subtle amygdalar volume changes in BD offspring. Even though we did not observe any significant difference in amygdalar volume between the HRHSA and HC groups, we discerned a trend for decreased amygdala volumes in the HRHSA group, and moderate effect sizes were observed in the differences of the amygdala volumes between the two groups. Therefore, this negative result could have arisen from the small size of the HRHSA group. This study's limitations are as follows. First, the number of subject in the HRHSA group was relatively small. Therefore, although we observed moderate effect sizes for the volume difference between the HRHSA and HC groups, and negative correlations between amygdalar volumes and the MASC social anxiety

score in the HRHSA group, we cannot completely exclude the chance that these results were falsely positive. Second, as a crosssectional study, we were not able to determine if these children with high social anxiety would indeed develop BD I or II. Third, although we tried to minimize the effects of anxiety symptoms other than social anxiety by excluding the subjects with PTSD, OCD, or panic disorder, as well as the effect of mood symptoms by controlling for YMRS score and CDRS-R score, other comorbid diagnoses may have influenced our findings. One met ODD, one met separation anxiety disorder, and five met GAD diagnoses among the high-risk group. Furthermore, not inconsiderable number of the HRHSA group (4 of 17, 23.5%) had attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).The presence of ADHD may have had an effect on our findings. There are inconsistent results regarding amygdalar volume in ADHD patients: some studies reported smaller amygdalar volume (Perlov et al., 2008), whereas other studies did not find any difference compared to healthy control (Frodl et al., 2010). However, the amygdala is not considered a critical region in ADHD pathophysiology (Bush et al., 2005). Furthermore, regarding amygdalar volume, there were no significant findings in a recent meta-analytic study on ADHD subjects (Frodl and Skokauskas, 2012). Therefore, even if ADHD diagnosis had had an effect on our findings, the effect would be minimal. Fourth, some of the participants had been exposed to psychotropic medication. Although, previous studies on the psychotropic medication and amygdala volume have reported inconsistent findings, the possibility that psychotropic medication exposure might have affected the amygdala volume cannot be excluded (Foland et al., 2008; Joyal et al., 2003; Puri, 2011; Szeszko et al., 2004; Usher et al., 2010). Despite these limitations, this study supports the suggestion from previous studies that the presence of social anxiety symptoms in high-risk youth may increase the risk of developing BD. Future longitudinal studies may be able to confirm whether BD offspring with high social anxiety symptoms indeed develop BD I or II more frequently than those without high social anxiety symptoms, and whether amygdalar volumes in those youth do predict the development of mania.

Conflict of interest Dr. Chang is a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, BristolMyers Squibb and Sunovion, and has received research support from GlaxoSmithKline and Merck in the last two years. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the NIMH (R01 MH077047 and K23 MH064460 to KDC and K23 MH085919 to MKS). We thank the participants who gave their time for this study.

Appendix A. Supplementary material Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015. 09.018. References Adolphs, R., 2010. What does the amygdala contribute to social cognition? Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 1191, 42–61.

M.-H. Park et al. / Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 234 (2015) 252–258

Altshuler, L.L., Bartzokis, G., Grieder, T., Curran, J., Mintz, J., 1998. Amygdala enlargement in bipolar disorder and hippocampal reduction in schizophrenia: an MRI study demonstrating neuroanatomic specificity. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 55, 663–664. Anderson, E.R., Jordan, J.A., Smith, A.J., Inderbitzen-Nolan, H.M., 2009. An examination of the MASC Social Anxiety Scale in a non-referred sample of adolescents. J. Anxiety Disord. 23, 1098–1105. Andreasen, N.C., Endicott, J., Spitzer, R.L., Winokur, G., 1977. The family history method using diagnostic criteria. Reliability and validity. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 34, 1229–1235. Arrais, K.C., Machado-de-Sousa, J.P., Trzesniak, C., Santos Filho, A., Ferrari, M.C., Osório, F.L., Loureiro, S.R., Nardi, A.E., Hetem, L.A., Zuardi, A.W., Hallak, J.E., Crippa, J.A., 2009. Social anxiety disorder women easily recognize fearfull, sad and happy faces: the influence of gender. J. Psychiatr. Res. 44, 535–540. Barnea-Goraly, N., Frazier, T.W., Piacenza, L., Minshew, N.J., Keshavan, M.S., Reiss, A. L., Hardan, A.Y., 2014. A preliminary longitudinal volumetric MRI study of amygdala and hippocampal volumes in autism. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 48, 124–128. Birbaumer, N., Grodd, W., Diedrich, O., Klose, U., Erb, M., Lotze, M., Schneider, F., Weiss, U., Flor, H., 1998. fMRI reveals amygdala activation to human faces in social phobics. Neuroreport 9, 1223–1226. Birmaher, B., Axelson, D., Monk, K., Kalas, C., Goldstein, B., Hickey, M.B., Obreja, M., Ehmann, M., Iyengar, S., Shamseddeen, W., Kupfer, D., Brent, D., 2009. Lifetime psychiatric disorders in school-aged offspring of parents with bipolar disorder: the Pittsburgh Bipolar Offspring study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 66, 287–296. Blair, K., Geraci, M., Devido, J., McCaffrey, D., Chen, G., Vythilingam, M., Ng, P., Hollon, N., Jones, M., Blair, R.J., Pine, D.S., 2008. Neural response to self- and other referential praise and criticism in generalized social phobia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 65, 1176–1184. Blumberg, H.P., Kaufman, J., Martin, A., Whiteman, R., Zhang, J.H., Gore, J.C., Charney, D.S., Krystal, J.H., Peterson, B.S., 2003. Amygdala and hippocampal volumes in adolescents and adults with bipolar disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 60, 1201–1208. Bush, G., Valera, E.M., Seidman, L.J., 2005. Functional neuroimaging of attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder: a review and suggested future directions. Biol. Psychiatry 57, 1273–1284. Campbell, D.W., Sareen, J., Paulus, M.P., Goldin, P.R., Stein, M.B., Reiss, J.P., 2007. Time-varying amygdala response to emotional faces in generalized social phobia. Biol. Psychiatry 62, 455–463. Chang, K., Karchemskiy, A., Barnea-Goraly, N., Garrett, A., Simeonova, D.I., Reiss, A., 2005. Reduced amygdalar gray matter volume in familial pediatric bipolar disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 44, 565–573. Cohen, J., 1977. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Acadeimc Press, New York. Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Asoociates, Hillsdale, New Jersey. Contreras, J., Hare, E., Pacheco, A., Escamilla, M., Raventos, H., 2010. Is subclinical anxiety an endophenotype for bipolar I patients? A study from a Costa Rican sample. J. Affect. Disord. 122, 267–272. Cooney, R.E., Atlas, L.Y., Joormann, J., Eugène, F., Gotlib, I.H., 2006. Amygdala activation in the processing of neutral faces in social anxiety disorder: is neutral really neutral? Psychiatry Res. 148, 55–59. Dale, A.M., Fischl, B., Sereno, M.I., 1999. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9, 179–194. DelBello, M.P., Zimmerman, M.E., Mills, N.P., Getz, G.E., Strakowski, S.M., 2004. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of amygdala and other subcortical brain regions in adolescents with bipolar disorder. Bipolar disord. 6, 43–52. Dickstein, D.P., Milham, M.P., Nugent, A.C., Drevets, W.C., Charney, D.S., Pine, D.S., Leibenluft, E., 2005. Frontotemporal alterations in pediatric bipolar disorder: results of a voxel-based morphometry study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 62, 734–741. Duffy, A., Horrocks, J., Doucette, S., Keown-Stoneman, C., McCloskey, S., Grof, P., 2013. Childhood anxiety: an early predictor of mood disorders in offspring of bipolar parents. J. Affect. Disord. 150, 363–369. Etkin, A., Wager, T.D., 2007. Functional neuroimaging of anxiety: a meta-analysis of emotional processing in PTSD, social anxiety disorder, and specific phobia. Am. J. Psychiatry 164, 1476–1488. First, M.B., Spitzer, R.L., Gibbon, M., Williams, J., 1995. Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV Axis I Disorders–Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, Version 2.0). Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York. Fischl, B., Salat, D.H., Busa, E., Albert, M., Dieterich, M., Haselgrove, C., van der Kouwe, A., Killiany, R., Kennedy, D., Klaveness, S., Montillo, A., Makris, N., Rosen, B., Dale, A.M., 2002. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33, 341–355. Foland, L.C., Altshuler, L.L., Sugar, C.A., Lee, A.D., Leow, A.D., Townsend, J., Narr, K.L., Asuncion, D.M., Toga, A.W., Thompson, P.M., 2008. Increased volume of the amygdala and hippocampus in bipolar patients treated with lithium. Neuroreport 19, 221–224. Freitas-Ferrari, M.C., Hallak, J.E., Trzesniak, C., Filho, A.S., Machado-de-Sousa, J.P., Chagas, M.H., Nardi, A.E., Crippa, J.A., 2008. Neuroimaging in social anxiety disorder: a systematic review of the literature. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 34, 565–580. Frodl, T., Skokauskas, N., 2012. Meta-analysis of structural MRI studies in children and adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder indicates treatment effects. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 125, 114–126. Frodl, T., Stauber, J., Schaaff, N., Koutsouleris, N., Scheuerecker, J., Ewers, M., Omerovic, M., Opgen-Rhein, M., Hampel, H., Reiser, M., Möller, H.J., Meisenzahl,

257

E., 2010. Amygdala reduction in patients with ADHD compared with major depression and healthy volunteers. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 121, 111–118. Geller, B., Zimerman, B., Williams, M., Bolhofner, K., Craney, J.L., DelBello, M.P., Soutullo, C., 2001. Reliability of the Washington University in St. Louis Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (WASH-U-KSADS) mania and rapid cycling sections. J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 40, 450–455. Gentili, C., Gobbini, M.I., Ricciardi, E., Vanello, N., Pietrini, P., Haxby, J.V., Guazzelli, M., 2008. Differential modulation of neural activity throughout the distributed neural system for face perception in patients with Social Phobia and healthy subjects. Brain Res. Bull. 77, 286–292. Glover, G.H., Lai, S., 1998. Self-navigated spiral fMRI: interleaved versus single-shot. Magn. Reson. Med. 39, 361–368. Guyer, A.E., Lau, J.Y., McClure-Tone, E.B., Parrish, J., Shiffrin, N.D., Reynolds, R.C., Chen, G., Blair, R.J., Leibenluft, E., Fox, N.A., Ernst, M., Pine, D.S., Nelson, E.E., 2008. Amygdala and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex function during anticipated peer evaluation in pediatric social anxiety. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 65, 1303–1312. Hajek, T., Gunde, E., Slaney, C., Propper, L., MacQueen, G., Duffy, A., Alda, M., 2009. Amygdala and hippocampal volumes in relatives of patients with bipolar disorder: a high-risk study. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Rev. Can. Psychiatr. 54, 726–733. Hoeft, F., Dai, L., Haas, B.W., Sheau, K., Mimura, M., Mills, D., Galaburda, A., Bellugi, U., Korenberg, J.R., Reiss, A.L., 2014. Mapping genetically controlled neural circuits of social behavior and visuo-motor integration by a preliminary examination of atypical deletions with Williams syndrome. PloS One 9, e104088. Irle, E., Ruhleder, M., Lange, C., Seidler-Brandler, U., Salzer, S., Dechent, P., Weniger, G., Leibing, E., Leichsenring, F., 2010. Reduced amygdalar and hippocampal size in adults with generalized social phobia. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 35, 126–131. Joyal, C.C., Laakso, M.P., Tiihonen, J., Syvalahti, E., Vilkman, H., Laakso, A., Alakare, B., Rakkolainen, V., Salokangas, R.K., Hietala, J., 2003. The amygdala and schizophrenia: a volumetric magnetic resonance imaging study in first-episode, neuroleptic-naive patients. Biol. Psychiatry 54, 1302–1304. Karchemskiy, A., Garrett, A., Howe, M., Adleman, N., Simeonova, D.I., Alegria, D., Reiss, A., Chang, K., 2011. Amygdalar, hippocampal, and thalamic volumes in youth at high risk for development of bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res. 194, 319–325. Ladouceur, C.D., Almeida, J.R., Birmaher, B., Axelson, D.A., Nau, S., Kalas, C., Monk, K., Kupfer, D.J., Phillips, M.L., 2008. Subcortical gray matter volume abnormalities in healthy bipolar offspring: potential neuroanatomical risk marker for bipolar disorder? J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 47, 532–539. Machado-de-Sousa, J.P., Osório Fde, L., Jackowski, A.P., Bressan, R.A., Chagas, M.H., Torro-Alves, N., Depaula, A.L., Crippa, J.A., Hallak, J.E., 2014. Increased amygdalar and hippocampal volumes in young adults with social anxiety. PloS One 9, e88523. March, J.S., Parker, J.D., Sullivan, K., Stallings, P., Conners, C.K., 1997. The Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC): factor structure, reliability, and validity. J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 36, 554–565. Marcinkiewcz, C.A., Green, M.K., Devine, D.P., Duarte, P., Vierck, C.J., Yezierski, R.P., 2009. Social defeat stress potentiates thermal sensitivity in operant models of pain processing. Brain Res. 1251, 112–120. Masi, G., Toni, C., Perugi, G., Mucci, M., Millepiedi, S., Akiskal, H.S., 2001. Anxiety disorders in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder: a neglected comorbidity. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Rev. Can. Psychiatr. 46, 797–802. Olsavsky, A.K., Brotman, M.A., Rutenberg, J.G., Muhrer, E.J., Deveney, C.M., Fromm, S. J., Towbin, K., Pine, D.S., Leibenluft, E., 2012. Amygdala hyperactivation during face emotion processing in unaffected youth at risk for bipolar disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 51, 294–303. Pearlson, G.D., Barta, P.E., Powers, R.E., Menon, R.R., Richards, S.S., Aylward, E.H., Federman, E.B., Chase, G.A., Petty, R.G., Tien, A.Y., 1997. Ziskind-Somerfeld Research Award 1996. Medial and superior temporal gyral volumes and cerebral asymmetry in schizophrenia versus bipolar disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 41, 1–14. Perlov, E., Philipsen, A., Tebartz van Elst, L., Ebert, D., Henning, J., Maier, S., Bubl, E., Hesslinger, B., 2008. Hippocampus and amygdala morphology in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 33, 509–515. Pfeifer, J.C., Welge, J., Strakowski, S.M., Adler, C.M., DelBello, M.P., 2008. Metaanalysis of amygdala volumes in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 47, 1289–1298. Phan, K.L., Fitzgerald, D.A., Nathan, P.J., Tancer, M.E., 2006. Association between amygdala hyperactivity to harsh faces and severity of social anxiety in generalized social phobia. Biol. Psychiatry 59, 424–429. Poznanski, E., Mokros, H.B., Grossman, J., Freeman, L.N., 1985. Diagnostic criteria in childhood depression. Am. J. Psychiatry 142, 1168–1173. Puri, B.K., 2011. Brain tissue changes and antipsychotic medication. Expert. Rev. Neurother. 11, 943–946. Rauch, S.L., Shin, L.M., Wright, C.I., 2003. Neuroimaging studies of amygdala function in anxiety disorders. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 985, 389–410. Rich, B.A., Vinton, D.T., Roberson-Nay, R., Hommer, R.E., Berghorst, L.H., McClure, E. B., Fromm, S.J., Pine, D.S., Leibenluft, E., 2006. Limbic hyperactivation during processing of neutral facial expressions in children with bipolar disorder. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103, 8900–8905. Schneider, F., Weiss, U., Kessler, C., Müller-Gärtner, H.W., Posse, S., Salloum, J.B., Grodd, W., Himmelmann, F., Gaebel, W., Birbaumer, N., 1999. Subcortical correlates of differential classical conditioning of aversive emotional reactions in social phobia. Biol. Psychiatry 45, 863–871. Sergerie, K., Chochol, C., Armony, J.L., 2008. The role of the amygdala in emotional processing: a quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 32, 811–830.

258

M.-H. Park et al. / Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 234 (2015) 252–258

Shah, S.G., Klumpp, H., Angstadt, M., Nathan, P.J., Phan, K.L., 2009. Amygdala and insula response to emotional images in patients with generalized social anxiety disorder. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 34, 296–302. Singh, M.K., Delbello, M.P., Adler, C.M., Stanford, K.E., Strakowski, S.M., 2008. Neuroanatomical characterization of child offspring of bipolar parents. J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 47, 526–531. Stein, M.B., Goldin, P.R., Sareen, J., Zorrilla, L.T., Brown, G.G., 2002. Increased amygdala activation to angry and contemptuous faces in generalized social phobia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 59, 1027–1034. Strakowski, S.M., DelBello, M.P., Sax, K.W., Zimmerman, M.E., Shear, P.K., Hawkins, J. M., Larson, E.R., 1999. Brain magnetic resonance imaging of structural abnormalities in bipolar disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 56, 254–260. Straube, T., Mentzel, H.J., Miltner, W.H., 2005. Common and distinct brain activation to threat and safety signals in social phobia. Neuropsychobiology 52, 163–168. Straube, T., Kolassa, I.T., Glauer, M., Mentzel, H.J., Miltner, W.H., 2004. Effect of task conditions on brain responses to threatening faces in social phobics: an eventrelated functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol. Psychiatry 56, 921–930. Swayze 2nd, V.W., Andreasen, N.C., Alliger, R.J., Yuh, W.T., Ehrhardt, J.C., 1992. Subcortical and temporal structures in affective disorder and schizophrenia: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol. Psychiatry 31, 221–240. Syal, S., Hattingh, C.J., Fouché, J.P., Spottiswoode, B., Carey, P.D., Lochner, C., Stein, D.

J., 2012. Grey matter abnormalities in social anxiety disorder: a pilot study. Metab. Brain Dis. 27, 299–309. Szeszko, P.R., MacMillan, S., McMeniman, M., Lorch, E., Madden, R., Ivey, J., Banerjee, S.P., Moore, G.J., Rosenberg, D.R., 2004. Amygdala volume reductions in pediatric patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder treated with paroxetine: preliminary findings. Neuropsychopharmacology 29, 826–832. Usher, J., Menzel, P., Schneider-Axmann, T., Kemmer, C., Reith, W., Falkai, P., Gruber, O., Scherk, H., 2010. Increased right amygdala volume in lithium-treated patients with bipolar I disorder. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 121, 119–124. Weems, C.F., Scott, B.G., Russell, J.D., Reiss, A.L., Carrion, V.G., 2013. Developmental variation in amygdala volumes among children with posttraumatic stress. Dev. Neuropsychol. 38, 481–495. Wei, C., Hoff, A., Villabo, M.A., Peterman, J., Kendall, P.C., Piacentini, J., McCracken, J., Walkup, J.T., Albano, A.M., Rynn, M., Sherrill, J., Sakolsky, D., Birmaher, B., Ginsburg, G., Keeton, C., Gosch, E., Compton, S.N., March, J., 2014. Assessing anxiety in youth with the multidimensional anxiety scale for children. J. Clin. Child. Adolesc. Psychol. 43, 566–578. Yoon, K.L., Fitzgerald, D.A., Angstadt, M., McCarron, R.A., Phan, K.L., 2007. Amygdala reactivity to emotional faces at high and low intensity in generalized social phobia: a 4-Tesla functional MRI study. Psychiatry Res. 154, 93–98. Young, R.C., Biggs, J.T., Ziegler, V.E., Meyer, D.A., 1978. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br. J. Psychiatry 133, 429–435.