Accepted Manuscript An educational intervention optimizes the utilization of arterial blood gases across intensive care units from different specialties: a quality improvement study Carlos D. Martínez-Balzano, MD, Paulo Oliveira, MD, Michelle O’Rourke, DAP ACBPBC, Luanne Hills, BS RRT, Andrés F. Sosa, MD PII:
S0012-3692(16)62323-1
DOI:
10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.035
Reference:
CHEST 780
To appear in:
CHEST
Please cite this article as: Martínez-Balzano CD, Oliveira P, O’Rourke M, Hills L, Sosa AF, On behalf of the Critical Care Operations Committee of the UMass Memorial Healthcare Center, An educational intervention optimizes the utilization of arterial blood gases across intensive care units from different specialties: a quality improvement study, CHEST (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.035. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
Text word count: 2716
2
Abstract word count: 248 Title: An educational intervention optimizes the utilization of arterial blood gases across
4
intensive care units from different specialties: a quality improvement study.
5
Running head: Optimization of ABGs in the ICU.
6
Authors: Carlos D. Martínez-Balzano, MD;1 Paulo Oliveira, MD;1 Michelle O’Rourke, DAP
7
ACBP-BC;2 Luanne Hills, BS RRT;3 Andrés F. Sosa, MD.1 On behalf of the Critical Care
8
Operations Committee of the UMass Memorial Healthcare Center.
9
Affiliations: 1. Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine. Department of
10
Medicine. University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA. 2. Department of
11
Nursing, UMass Memorial Healthcare Center, Worcester, MA. 3. Department of Respiratory
12
Care, UMass Memorial Healthcare Center, Worcester, MA.
13
Corresponding author: Andrés F. Sosa, MD. Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care
14
Medicine, Department of Medicine. University of Massachusetts Medical School. 55 N Lake
15
Ave, Worcester, MA 01655. E-mail:
[email protected].
16
No conflicts of interest are reported.
17
No external funding was used for the preparation of this manuscript.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Abstract
19
Background: Arterial blood gas (ABG) overutilization leads to increased costs, inefficient use of
20
staff work-hours, patient discomfort and blood loss. We developed guidelines to optimize ABG
21
utilization in the intensive care unit (ICU).
22
Methods: ABG utilization guidelines were implemented on all adult ICUs in our institution:
23
three medical, two trauma-surgery, one cardiovascular and one neurosurgical ICU. While relying
24
on pulse oximetry, we encouraged the utilization of ABGs after an acute respiratory event or for
25
a rational clinical concern, and discouraged obtaining ABGs for routine surveillance, after
26
planned changes of PEEP or FiO2 on the mechanical ventilator, for spontaneous breathing trials,
27
or when a disorder was not suspected. ABG numbers and global ICU metrics were collected
28
before (year 2014) and after the intervention (year 2015).
29
Results: We saw a reduction of 821.5 ± 257.4 ABGs/month (41.5%) or approximately 1
30
ABG/patient/mechanical ventilation day at each month (43.1 %) after introducing the guidelines
31
(p <0.001). This represented 49L of saved blood, a reduction of $39,432 in the costs of ICU care
32
and 1,643 staff work-hours freed for other tasks. Appropriately indicated tests rose to 83.4%
33
from a baseline 67.5% (p= 0.002). Less than 5% of inappropriately indicated ABGs changed
34
patient management in the post-intervention period. There were no significant differences in
35
mechanical ventilation days, severity of illness or ICU mortality among the two periods.
36
Conclusion: The large scale implementation of guidelines for ABG utilization, reduced the
37
number of inappropriately ordered ABGs over seven different multidisciplinary ICUs, without
38
negatively impacting patient care.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
39
Introduction Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis is one of the most common tests ordered in the
41
intensive care unit (ICU). ABGs are time-consuming and associated with increased costs, blood
42
loss and patient discomfort.1 Disproportionate ordering of ABGs is not supported by strong
43
evidence and seems to be driven by cultural factors. These include the notions that every change
44
in the mechanical ventilator requires a follow-up ABG, and that ICU patients on mechanical
45
ventilation (MV) need at least one or more ABGs per day for “routine” monitoring by virtue of
46
being the sickest patients in the hospital.2-6 Accordingly, a study from a large academic hospital
47
found that only 26.4% of ABGs were ordered after an acute respiratory event.3 Similarly, other
48
researchers have found that between 42.7% and 66% of ABGs were not clinically justified in
49
their ICUs.5-7 The implementation of utilization guidelines in other institutions has resulted in a
50
decrease in the number of ABGs, with significant savings in blood loss and costs of ICU care,
51
along with an increase in the clinical appropriateness of these tests.5-8
SC
M AN U
TE D
52
RI PT
40
In early 2014, the critical care leadership at our institution was alerted to the high number of ABGs that were being drawn. Many of these tests were thought to be redundant or
54
inappropriately indicated. These institutional concerns were in line with the statements of the
55
Choose Wisely in critical care campaign, which calls for an optimization of medical
56
interventions and a reduction of unnecessary tests that do not change clinical management.9,10 As
57
a response, we set out to develop institutional guidelines and an educational project with the
58
goals of increasing the appropriateness of ordered ABGs and to decrease the number of tests.
59
Here we describe the results found after one year of this quality improvement intervention.
60
AC C
EP
53
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
61
Methods
62
Setting and guideline development The study was implemented at the two primary campuses of the tertiary academic UMass
64
Memorial Medical Center, in Worcester, MA. These two facilities are affiliated to the University
65
of Massachusetts Medical School and have seven adult ICUs: three medical units with 46 total
66
beds, one 16-bed cardiovascular unit, one 12-bed neurosurgical unit and two trauma-surgery
67
units with 24 total beds. Monthly ICU bed occupancy rates are consistently ≥90%. All ICUs are
68
overseen by a Critical Care Operations Committee (CCOC), a multidisciplinary group of
69
physicians working in collaboration with affiliate practitioners (APs), nurses, respiratory
70
therapists (RTs), pharmacists, nutritionists, care coordinators and clinical quality officers.11
71
A team consisting of two pulmonary and critical care attending physicians (A.S. and
M AN U
SC
RI PT
63
P.O.), a pulmonary and critical care fellow (C.M.B.), a nurse manager (M.O.) and a respiratory
73
care manager (L.H.) was responsible for identifying areas of improvement and developing
74
interventions that might decrease the total number of ABGs. During our analysis, we used a
75
fishbone method to uncover potential root causes which were separated into standard categories
76
including: man, method, machine and materials. The results of this analysis lead us to focus on
77
the human domain and ultimately our plan for an educational intervention. A baseline survey
78
among physicians and APs (43 subjects, respondent rate 68.2%) identified the following stances
79
toward ordering ABGs: 90.6% would order them for routine surveillance, 69.7% during
80
spontaneous breathing trials, 81.4% for every planned change in FiO2 or PEEP on MV and
81
65.1% obtained them for “convenience” when an arterial line was available. As a way to
82
eliminate weak indications or wrong preconceptions and, at the same time, maintain a certain
83
degree of homogeneity in ordering ABGs within our institution, it was thought that the
AC C
EP
TE D
72
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
84
introduction of a guideline along with frequent education, would be the best intervention to reach
85
our goal of decreasing ABG overutilization without compromising patient care. The guideline was developed by consensus after a review of the published literature by
RI PT
86
the team. These principles were followed: a) there are no uniform prospectively validated
88
guidelines for indication of ABGs, b) ABGs are valuable tests to assess for disorders of
89
oxygenation, ventilation and acid-base equilibrium, c) ABGs should be ordered in response to an
90
acute event or rational concern, d) there is no role for obtaining routine ABGs, e) ABGs are
91
overutilized, f) there is reasonably good evidence that ABG utilization guidelines decrease the
92
number of these tests without negatively impacting patient care, g) pulse oximetry is a reliable
93
resource to monitor oxygenation12 and, h) the guideline should be flexible, simple and easy to
94
follow by all members of the ICU team. The guideline was presented to the CCOC on November
95
2014 which approved it after minor revisions. A small pilot study of two weeks in a 16-bed
96
medical ICU showed that the guideline was feasible to execute. Full implementation on all ICUs
97
was started in January 2015. Figure 1 illustrates the proposed ABG protocol.
98
Educational interventions
M AN U
TE D
EP
99
SC
87
One lecture for all members of the ICU team was given at each individual ICU between late December 2014 and early January 2015. An additional lecture was given to the nurses and
101
RTs of each unit by their respective manager. We encouraged open and constructive discussion
102
among the ICU staff when a disagreement for the indication of an ABG was encountered. Posters
103
illustrating the guideline were placed in physician and AP working areas (e-Figure 1). Stickers
104
with reminders to review the guideline were attached on the ABG portable analyzers (i-STAT
105
handheld analyzer, Abbott Point of Care Inc., Princeton, NJ). The number of ABGs and
106
compliance with the guideline were monitored by nurse and RT managers, as well as by the
AC C
100
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
authors. Monthly email communication between the authors and the managers allowed for
108
continuous feedback. Cumulative results were discussed at CCOC meetings during February,
109
May, July and September of 2015; these meetings were also used as an opportunity to reinforce
110
education.
111
Data collection and statistical analysis
Absolute number of ABGs for all ICUs were tracked for the calendar year of 2015 and
SC
112
RI PT
107
compared to the numbers from the previous year. A sample of random ABGs over two periods of
114
3 weeks between November and December 2014 (pre-intervention), and March and April 2015
115
(post-intervention) were collected retrospectively and compared for appropriateness of
116
indications, as defined by the guideline. Physician, nurse and RT notes were reviewed to this
117
end. Our Institutional Review Board approved a waiver of consent for the chart evaluation
118
(#H00007053). Global ICU metrics, including number of ICU patients, average number of
119
ventilator-days, ICU length of stay, average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation
120
(APACHE) IV scores and ICU mortality, among others, for the years 2014 and 2015 were
121
collected and compared.
TE D
EP
122
M AN U
113
Continuous variables are presented as means ± standard deviation and compared using a two tailed Student’s t-test. Categorical variables are presented as counts or percentages and
124
compared using X2. Variables with nonparametric distributions are presented as medians with
125
interquartile ranges. Statistical significance was defined by a p value <0.05. Statistical analysis
126
was performed using STATA version 10 (StataCorp; College Station, TX).
AC C
123
127
128
Results
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
After the educational intervention was implemented, we saw a significant reduction of
130
monthly ABGs of 41.5% (821.5 ± 257.4 ABGs/month, p <0.001), consistent with an absolute
131
reduction of 9,858 ABGs for the year 2015 (Figure 2A). A reduction in the number of ABGs was
132
consistently seen in all ICUs regardless of medical specialty (Figure 2B). When the ABGs were
133
adjusted for the number of patients on MV and the number of MV days, we a saw a reduction of
134
approximately 1 test/patient/day at each month, corresponding to a 43.1% decline (0.9 ± 0.2
135
ABG/patient/day, p <0.001) (Figure 2C). A statistically significant decline in the number of
136
adjusted ABGs was retained for each individual ICU (Figure 2D), except for one of the medical
137
ICUs which had a marginal p value of 0.05. The cardiovascular ICU had the largest change with
138
approximately two less ABG/patient/day per month.
SC
M AN U
139
RI PT
129
The reduction was cumulative through the year 2015 and more pronounced during its last third (Figure 2E). The adjusted ABG medians for each consecutive quarter of 2014 were 1.9
141
(1.5-3.6), 2.1 (1.4-4), 1.7 (1.3-3) and 1.7 (1-3.3). In comparison, the 2015 medians were: 1 (0.8-
142
2.4), 1.2 (0.9-2.4), 1.4 (0.7-2) and 0.8 (0.6-1.3). Other commonly ordered ICU tests did not
143
decline in numbers during the study period (Figure 3).
EP
144
TE D
140
Adequately indicated tests increased to 83.4% from a baseline of 67.5% (p= 0.002) (Figure 4). The inappropriate indications found at baseline were routine monitoring (81.5%,
146
31/38) and follow-up of small changes of PEEP or FiO2 with a reliable SpO2 (18.4%, 7/38). This
147
distribution was similar for the lower number of inappropriate ABGs found after the
148
intervention, with 91.3% (21/23) and 8.6% (2/23), respectively. Appropriately indicated tests
149
were more likely to change patient management in comparison to inappropriately indicated ones,
150
for both baseline, 70.8% (56/79) vs. 7.8% (3/38) (p <0.001), and post-intervention, 56% (65/116)
151
vs. 4.3% (1/23) (p= 0.001). The changes in management prompted by the four inappropriately
AC C
145
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
indicated tests were: an increase in VE for two patients with metabolic acidosis, another increase
153
in VE due to unclear reasons, and an escalation of the flow of oxygen-- in spite of adequate PaO2
154
and SaO2 on ABG-- based on a clinician’s personal preference.
155
RI PT
152
There were no significant differences in markers of disease severity and ICU outcomes for the two periods that were compared (Table 1). There was no difference in the variation of
157
attending physicians in the ICUs. All units were attended by the same group of nurses and RTs
158
for the two years without major staff changes.
SC
156
The intervention translated into an approximate 49L of saved blood, when all ABG data
160
were pooled, based on a reported average of 5 mL of blood drawn per ABG. There was a direct
161
reduction of $39,432 in the costs of ICU care (this only accounts for the $4 i-STAT ABG
162
cartridge) and 1,643 work-staff hours were freed for other tasks. These time savings were
163
estimated based on the self-reported average time to draw an ABG and run it through the
164
portable analyzer (10 min) and could represent potential savings of $98,580, if one assumes $60
165
of nursing care/hour.
168
Discussion
AC C
167
EP
166
TE D
M AN U
159
Previously published experiences with different ABG utilization protocols have shown
169
that redundant blood gas testing can be reduced safely.5-8 Although all of these studies based
170
their criteria for drawing an ABG on an acute respiratory event or a rational clinical concern,
171
they allowed for some degree of routine utilization. We instead decided to part away completely
172
with the notion of obtaining routine ABGs. In our protocol, every ABG is effectively obtained as
173
a response to an acute clinical change, an intervention related to that change, or a clinician’s
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
concern. To follow this approach, we relied on continuous pulse oximetry monitoring and open
175
and honest discussions among all of the ICU team members. Our intervention led to an adjusted
176
ABG reduction of 43% that was similar to previously reported rates of 41%, 44% and 48%,5,7,8
177
and higher than an additional report of 24%.6
178
RI PT
174
Our study demonstrates that this intervention can be feasibly and safely implemented on a large scale over multiple ICUs of different specialties. While the previous studies were
180
conducted on one or two ICUs, 5-8 we present results from 7 different ICUs with 98 total beds,
181
making this the largest intervention for ABG optimization reported to date. The decrease in ABG
182
utilization seen in our study was due to the implementation of the guideline and not driven by
183
other factors such as a change in disease severity, volume of patients, number of MV days or
184
cultural trends in the reduction of tests.
M AN U
Rather than restricting the ordering of ABGs by a threshold, such as a specific SaO2 or
TE D
185
SC
179
pH, we instead focused on a flexible and simple guideline based on a clinical concern. This relies
187
heavily on the assumption of having a well-trained ICU team with good and open
188
communication. This may limit the generalization of our study to other ICUs with less staff
189
support. We believe that providing ICU team members with a guideline that encourages them to
190
think critically about their patients improves their clinical acumen, in particular for the housestaff
191
in training, and allows them to retain their decision-making autonomy.13,14
AC C
192
EP
186
Frequent reinforcement is required for an educational intervention to effectively change
193
culture. Accordingly, we provided regular reeducation and feedback about the utilization of the
194
guideline which likely led to its adherence. We also made the protocol easily available and
195
provided the staff with reminders in order to modify behavior.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
196
Some obstacles were encountered to the implementation of the guidelines. Part of the housestaff and RTs felt that they needed to limit the number of drawn ABGs to follow hospital
198
policy and avoid potential reprisals. This issue was solved by re-educating the ICU team,
199
detailing what the guideline entailed and explaining that it was not a substitute, but rather an
200
aide, for clinical judgment. We also found that the ARDS guideline in our hospital had a vague
201
recommendation for “consideration of frequent blood gas sampling” which was resolved by
202
addressing this issue specifically with our committee. The impact of the utilization protocol did
203
not decrease over time and we did not find any significant rebounds in the numbers of ordered
204
ABGs. This was probably a result of the continuous education and feedback.
SC
M AN U
205
RI PT
197
Our study has limitations. We assessed the appropriateness of ABG utilization as dictated by the guideline but we did not evaluate the patients without ABGs. This did not translate in
207
patient harm, as shown by a lack of change in meaningful ICU metrics, but one could argue that
208
studying these patients would provide insight on the attitudes and factors that drive the need for
209
obtaining, or withholding, blood gas analysis. It would have also been interesting to study the
210
appropriateness of all ABGs, instead that of a sample, but the sheer amount of tests made that
211
logistically impossible. We also did not assess for the potential reduction in nosocomial
212
infections, by decrease in the number of needlesticks, which this intervention could have
213
induced. We were also not able to track if the intervention caused a decrease in the number of
214
arterial lines that were placed, or the days that they remained inserted. This protocol will be
215
prospectively evaluated by acquiring ABG numbers, repeating educational interventions,
216
addressing concerns and potential problems that may arise as the guideline continues to be
217
implemented. Additionally, our interventions may have fostered a change in institutional culture,
218
which we plan to fully analyze in the near future.
AC C
EP
TE D
206
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
219
We believe that the decision to do an intervention in the healthcare setting should be based on a rational concern paired with the best available evidence. Previous reports have shown
221
that cultural attitudes in healthcare do not necessarily go along with a clinical benefit. Medical
222
studies have shown that routine ABGs do not change extubation outcomes and may, in fact,
223
prolong MV,15,16 arterial line placement does not change mortality retrospectively and requires
224
prospective and case-by-case validation,17,18 and the practice of obtaining venous blood gases for
225
ScvO2 monitoring in sepsis does not change outcomes.19-21 These examples demonstrate the need
226
to individualize interventions, based on rational evidence, and to avoid unnecessary tests and
227
procedures that carry significant cost-burdens, discomfort and potential harms. In this sense, we
228
believe that our study offers important results that could influence future ICU care.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
220
229
Conclusions
TE D
230
The implementation of guidelines for arterial blood gas testing reduced the number of
232
inappropriately ordered ABGs across seven different multidisciplinary ICUs, with significant
233
costs savings and reduction of blood loss without negatively impacting patient care.
AC C
234
EP
231
235
Acknowledgements
236
C.M.B, A.S., P.O., L.H. and M.O. participated in the concept and design of the study and
237
executed the educational interventions.
238
C.M.B. and A.S. collected and interpreted data.
239
C.M.B. performed statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
A.S., P.O., L.H. and M.O. revised and approved the final manuscript.
241
A.S. served as the principal investigator, had access to all of the data and is the guarantor of the
242
study.
243
We thank all the UMass ICU physicians, APs, nurses, RTs, clinical data and quality officers for
244
making this intervention a success. We also thank Jennifer MacPherson, Gurudev Lotun, BE,
245
BSc(Comp); and Teresa Rincon RN, BSN, CCRN-E, FCCM, for providing us with ancillary
246
data.
247
Preliminary results of this study were presented in abstract form at the annual ATS conference,
248
5/16/16 in San Francisco, CA. An ATS travel grant was awarded to C.M.B. for this purpose.
249
C.M.B is now in the Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine at SUNY Upstate
250
Medical University, Syracuse, NY.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
240
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
References
252
1. Andrews T, Waterman H, Hillier V. Blood gas analysis: a study of blood loss in intensive
253
care. J Adv Nurs. 1999;30(4):851-857.
254
2. Wang TJ, Mort EA, Nordberg P, et al. A utilization management intervention to reduce
255
unnecessary testing in the coronary care unit. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(16):1885-1890.
256
3. Melanson SE, Szymanski T, Rogers SO, et al. Utilization of arterial blood gas measurements
257
in a large tertiary care hospital. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007;127(4):604-609.
258
4. Al-Moamary M, Daniel D, Battwa F, Al-Jahdali H, Al-Shimemeri A. Appropriateness of
259
arterial blood gas measurements in acute care general wards. Ann Saudi Med. 1999;19(2):153-
260
155.
261
5. Merlani P, Garnerin P, Diby M, Ferring M, Ricou B. Quality improvement report: Linking
262
guideline to regular feedback to increase appropriate requests for clinical tests: blood gas
263
analysis in intensive care. BMJ. 2001;323(7313):620-624. Erratum in: BMJ.
264
2001;323(7319):993.
265
6. Browning JA, Kaiser DL, Durbin CG Jr. The effect of guidelines on the appropriate use of
266
arterial blood gas analysis in the intensive care unit. Respir Care. 1989;34(3):269–276.
267
7. Pilon CS, Leathley M, London R, et al. Practice guideline for arterial blood gas measurement
268
in the intensive care unit decreases numbers and increases appropriateness of tests. Crit Care
269
Med. 1997;25(8):1308-1313.
270
8. Roberts D, Ostryzniuk P, Loewen E, et al. Control of blood gas measurements in intensive-
271
care units. Lancet. 1991;337(8757):1580-1582.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
251
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
9. Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Hall JB, Wilson KC, Munro CL, Hill NS. Choosing wisely in
273
critical care: maximizing value in the ICU. Chest. 2014;146(5):1142-1144.
274
10. American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation. Critical Care Societies Collaborative -
275
critical care: five things physicians and patients should question. Choosing Wisely website
276
http://www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists/critical-care-societies-collaborative-critical-
277
care/ Released January 28, 2014. Accessed May 6, 2016.
278
11. Irwin RS, Flaherty HM, French CT, et al; UMass Memorial Critical Care Operations Team.
279
Interdisciplinary collaboration: the slogan that must be achieved for models of delivering critical
280
care to be successful. Chest. 2012;142(6):1611-1619.
281
12. Davis MD, Walsh BK, Sittig SE, Restrepo RD. AARC clinical practice guideline: blood gas
282
analysis and hemoximetry: 2013. Respir Care. 2013;58(10):1694-1703.
283
13. Norman GR, Schmidt HG. The psychological basis of problem-based learning: a review of
284
the evidence. Acad Med. 1992;67(9):557-565.
285
14. Young T, Rohwer A, Volmink J, Clarke M. What are the effects of teaching evidence-based
286
health care (EBHC)? Overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86706.
287
15. Pawson SR, DePriest JL. Are blood gases necessary in mechanically ventilated patients who
288
have successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial? Respir Care. 2004;49(11):1316-
289
1319.
290
16. Salam A, Smina M, Gada P, et al. The effect of arterial blood gas values on extubation
291
decisions. Respir Care. 2003;48(11):1033-1037.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
272
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
17. Hsu DJ, Feng M, Kothari R, Zhou H, Chen KP, Celi LA. The association between indwelling
293
arterial catheters and mortality in hemodynamically stable patients with respiratory failure: a
294
propensity score analysis. Chest. 2015;148(6):1470-1476.
295
18. Gershengorn HB, Wunsch H, Scales DC, Zarychanski R, Rubenfeld G, Garland A.
296
Association between arterial catheter use and hospital mortality in intensive care units. JAMA
297
Intern Med. 2014;174(11):1746-1754.
298
19. ARISE Investigators; ANZICS Clinical Trials Group, Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, et al.
299
Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med.
300
2014;371(16):1496-1506.
301
20. ProCESS Investigators, Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, et al. A randomized trial of
302
protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(18):1683-1693.
303
21. Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al; ProMISe Trial Investigators. Trial of early, goal-
304
directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1301-1311.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
292
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 1. Guideline for the utilization of arterial blood gases. ABG: arterial blood gas, SBT:
306
spontaneous breathing trial, VBG: venous blood gas, FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen, PEEP:
307
positive end-expiratory pressure, SaO2: arterial blood oxygen saturation, SpO2: peripheral
308
capillary oxygen saturation.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
305
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 2. A- Overall number of monthly ABGs at baseline (year 2014) and after introduction
310
(year 2015) of the guidelines, *= p <0.001. B- Average monthly reduction of ABGs for each
311
individual ICU, *= p <0.001, θ= p value of 0.003. C and D- ABG reduction adjusted by number
312
of patients on MV and MV days at each month for all (C) and each individual ICU (D), *= p
313
<0.001, ξ= p value of 0.001. E- Median number of ABGs with interquartile ranges across all
314
ICUs over time. ABG: arterial blood gas, ICU: intensive care unit, MICU: medical intensive
315
care unit, MV: mechanical ventilation, SICU: surgical intensive care unit. Bars in figures A,B,C
316
and D: standard deviation.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
309
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 3. Average monthly numbers for laboratory studies in the ICU. A significant reduction
318
was seen only for the ABGs. Bars: standard deviation. ICU: intensive care unit, ABG: arterial
319
blood gas, CBC: complete blood count, BMP: basic metabolic panel, PT: prothrombin time,
320
PTT: partial thromboplastin time.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
317
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 4. Adequacy of indications for ABG testing before and after the guideline
322
implementation. ABG: arterial blood gas.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
321
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 1. Combined metrics for all ICUs before and after the introduction of the guideline. Year 2014
Year 2015
p value
Average number of patients per month ± SD
626 ± 30
642 ± 29
0.21
Average APACHE IV score ± SD
63.8 ± 5.02 62.5 ± 4.30
0.33
Average length of ICU stay (days ± SD)
4.2 ± 0.12
0.92
Average number of ventilator days ± SD
3.18 ± 0.18 3.24 ± 0.32
0.59
Actual ventilator days/predicted ventilator days ± SD 1.11 ± 0.20 1.19 ± 0.24
0.22
RI PT
Variable
4.2 ± 0.27
SC
M AN U
323
9.67 ± 1.25 10.43 ± 0.92 0.10
ICU mortality (% ± SD)
0.88 ± 0.23 0.95 ± 0.17
0.29
ICU readmission rate (% ± SD)
4.03 ± 0.42 4.04 ± 0.43
0.97
TE D
Actual mortality/predicted mortality ± SD
ICU: intensive care unit, SD: standard deviation, APACHE: Acute Physiology and Chronic
325
Health Evaluation.
AC C
EP
324
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
e-Figure 1. Poster illustrating the guideline. ABG: arterial blood gas, SBT: spontaneous
327
breathing trial, VBG: venous blood gas, FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen, PEEP: positive end-
328
expiratory pressure, SaO2: arterial blood oxygen saturation, SpO2: peripheral capillary oxygen
329
saturation, A-line: arterial line, ICU: intensive care unit, FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
326
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Abbreviations
ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome CCOC: Critical Care Operations Committee
ICU: intensive care unit MV: mechanical ventilation
TE D
NP: nurse practitioner
M AN U
FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen
PEEP: positive end-expiratory pressure
EP
RT: respiratory therapist
SaO2: arterial blood oxygen saturation
AC C
SD: standard deviation
SpO2: peripheral capillary oxygen saturation ScvO2: central venous oxygen saturation VE: minute ventilation
SC
APACHE: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation
RI PT
ABG: arterial blood gas
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
e-Figure 1. Poster illustrating the guideline. ABG: arterial blood gas, 326 SBT: spontaneous breathing trial, VBG: venous blood gas, FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen, PEEP: positive end expiratory pressure, SaO2: arterial blood oxygen saturation, SpO2: peripheral capillary oxygen saturation, A-line: arterial line, ICU: intensive care unit, FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen.
161250 Online supplements are not copyedited prior to posting and the author(s) take full responsibility for the accuracy o all data.