An enzyme-catalyzed synthesis of natural α-tocopherol

An enzyme-catalyzed synthesis of natural α-tocopherol

095%4166/93w&Ml0 PergalnollprrrsLtd Tandtubt:Asyw~ Vol. 4, No. 9. pp. 1961-1964.1993 %%tdinGRatBlitain Eisaku Mizuguchi, Masumi Taktmoto, and Kszuo ...

242KB Sizes 1 Downloads 12 Views

095%4166/93w&Ml0 PergalnollprrrsLtd

Tandtubt:Asyw~ Vol. 4, No. 9. pp. 1961-1964.1993 %%tdinGRatBlitain

Eisaku Mizuguchi, Masumi Taktmoto, and Kszuo Achiwa* annsceutieal seifnces,udversjtyof schoOlOfPh

z5hhudw

52-I Y&I, ShiEuoiu 422, Japan

(Received in Japan 16 Juno 1993)

The a-tocopherol Mamin E) is known as a potent and safe, lipid-soluble antioxidant. Recently, tocopherol and super oxide dismtase@OD) and other antioxidants are attracting attention as scavengers of super oxide seri&.

As tocoptil

is being used for various purpares, in the future, demand will more increase. Presently,

the majopity of tocopherol is being used as a mixture of its eight isomw, which weie mpofted to show different biological activities. Tocopherof with the S configuration at the 2-position of its chroman ring is weak in its biological activities2. Rreviousiy, d&ocopheroljWS,4’R,8’R)-I] has been resolved into d- and I-tocopherol [@I - and W-11 by Karrer” and Robeson4et al . using 3-bromocamphor-&sulfonate or piperazine, reqectively. However, their optical resolution is not efficient and of less utiiity val&. After investigation, we found an effective synthesis of natural a-tocopherol using the enzyme-catalyzed kinetic resolution and the conversion of the unnatural enantiomer to a-tocopherol by its racemization and repeated enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis.

First, enzymatic hydrolysis of dl-tooopherol

acetate and benzoate were examined, but these reactions were

unsuccessful. Next, we chose to& acetate[W)-71 as less sterically hindered substrate. Its ester site and stexeogenic carbon atom of the chromsn 2-position were more able to interact with enzymes. The O-7 was synthesized as shown in Scheme 1. Table 1 shows the results of its enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis. The hydrolysis of @S&7 with lipaseAY6 gave (R)-77 in extremely high optical yield f>We), which was converted to natural a-toqhm1 IGR)-118 WHKBUC r-am&&n by dial acco&ng to fijima’s method? It is an interest@ result that t&S)=7is hydrolyzed with high enantioaelectivity by lipaseAY, in spite of the reaction site being fairly remote from the steorogenic castxm atom of its chroman ring. To out knowledge, no e.nzyme-cata@zedenantioselective hydrolysis of this tyqe of substrate haa baeo rqxmedt”. l%l

1962

E. kflZUCiUCH1

Scheme 1

OH

al.

Enzymatic Synthesis of d-a-Tccopherol a

2

et

-

75%

R

w 3

b 94%

O

4

I

OH 5

(RS)-6

Enzyme

(RS)-7

\

*

H*O/lPE

Reagents; a KMn04/acetone 6 vinyl bromide+B&i/Et20 c BFrEtaOQO dAcCI, Et$VTHF e CH20,HsB04,HzlPd-CI(CHsO)~B f AcCl,Et3NTTHF,Na2Cr2Cr/AcDH g NaOWEtOH h NaBH4, then Ha/Pd-CIMeOH

Table 1 Lipase-cafalyzed Kinefic Resolution of To&acetate

RS-7 a

W6

w7

mY-7

Enzyme”

1

lipase AY

1

32

>99

60

36

2

CHE

46

42

76

50

55

3

liise AH

48

78

2.5

16

12

4

lipase PS

48

100

0

0

0

5

lipase M

46

100

0

0

0

a All reactions

Time(h) C.Y. (%I b

O.Y. (%ee)’

C.Y. (%I b

0-Y. (%ee) ’

Entry

were carried out by stlmng a mixture 01 substrate(100n-g )lipase(lOOmg~and IPE saturated with waler at 25%. b Isolated yield c Opbcal yields 017 were determIned by HPLC analyses using a column packed with Ch~ralcel OD-i-l (2-propanol/hexane),and optical yields of 6 were detefmvNd after conversK)n to 7.

Synthesis of natural a-tocopherol

1963

Scheme 2

H20/lPE

w-10 kc-tocopherol

W-11

Reagents, a pyrrolidine/toluene b AcCI,Et$WHF c NaB&.thenHzIPd-CIMeOH d CH20, H3B0,,H~Pd-C/(CH30)3B e EtONa/EtOH

Table 2 Lipase-catalyzed Kinetic Resolution of RS- 10 a

w-8

(R)_l 0

ms~-lo Entry

Enzyme’

Time(h)

1

IipaseAH

2

13

42

87

31

2

IipaseAK

8

36

18

64

39

3

IipaseM

24

40

74

55

40

4

IipaseAY

0.7

18

9.7

73

22

5

F-AP15

72

53

13

40

41

C.Y.(%OJ.Y.(%eeIc

C.Y.(%)QD.Y.(%ee)c

a All reactK)ns were carried out by siimng a mixture of substrate(l00mg)llpase(lOOmg)afld IPE saturated wlh water al 25%. b lsohted yield. c Optical yields of 10 were determtned by HPLC analyses using a column packed wrfh Chlralcel OD-H (2-propanol/hexane).and optical yields 8 were determlned after converslon to 10.

E. IvItzuouc~~et al.

1964

Acetylation of the other enantiomer [O-6] and subsequent oxidation with Na2Cr2@ gave 4-oxotccol acetate [(5’)-lo], which was easily racemized with NaOEt. Reduction of the @5)-)-sthus obtained with NaBH4 and subsequent hydrogenation with W-C gave (KY)-6. This (RT)-6 was then employed as a substrate of enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis. Alternatively, t&!&l0 was synthesized directly from 2,Sdihydroxyacetophenone (9) as shown in Scheme 2 and similarly submitted to enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis. Table 2 shows the results. The (R)-10” obtained by enzyme-catalyzed kinetic resolution was reduced to f.@-tocol by NaBHqreduction and W-C catalyzed hydrogenation, which was then methylated to give natural a-tocopherol [@)-I]*. The unnatural enantiomer [Gs)-81 was converted to the substrate [O-101

for the enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis by racemization and

subsequent acetylation.

REFERENCES

AND NOTES

1.

Niki,B.;KonnuoE.; “OxygenRadicaLsin Biology and hfedicine”,(Simic.M.G.;Taylor.K.A.;WardJ.F.;

2.

(a)Ames.S.R.;Ludwig.M.I.;Nelm~D.R.;R0beson.C.D.;Biochemistry,l9632,188.

c.voll Somltageds.)

(b)MacMin.LJ.;Gsbriebriel.E.; B&M.;

J.Nutr. 1982.112.1437.

Karrer.P.;Koenig.H.;Ringier.B.H.;Sslomon.H.;Helv.Chem.Acta,1939.22,1139. Robeson.C.D.;Nelan.D.R.: J.Am.Chem.Soc.1962,84.3196.USP.3.153.04&1964. Schudel.P.;Mayer.H.;Matzged.;Ruegg.R.;Isler.O.;Helv.Chem.Acta.l%3.46,333, Enymes were kindly supplied by Amen0 Flumxeutical CHE(Cholesed

Co.,Ltd. @sseAY(Candida fugosa)

es&rase).lipaseAH(sp.)~ipssePS(Pse~o~~sp.),tipaseM(Mucorjavanicus)

lipaseAK(?%e&monas sp.),F-APlWWzopus javankud. 7.

(R)-?: [a]D2’ +4.1 (c 0.6 EtGH). lH-NMR(CDC13) 6: 0.80-0.88(12H.m).1.05-1.65 (24H.m). 1.651.91(2H,m), 2.25(3H.s),2.70(2H,tJ=4.4Hz), 6.53-7.67(3H.m).

8.

identificationwss csrriedout by comparisonof HPLC analysisusinga cohnmtpsckedwitb Daicel Chimkel OD-H(bex&-pq.xmol=2~0/1)

with an authentic d-a-tocopbeml.

(R)-l:[a]Dm +0.68 (c 0.8 EtOH). [lit.5 +0.75(EtOH), authenticd-a-tocopheml+O.70(c 1.0 EtOH)]. lo-NMR (CDC13) 8: 0.82-0.88(12H,m),1.07-1.60(24H,m),1.72-1.85(2H,m),2.10-2.18(9H,m), 2.60(2H.t.l=2Hz). 4.18(1H.s).MASSzn/z(M+)430. 9.

Kijima.S.:Nonska.A.; J’P.60-4183(1985).

10.

Pmvioosly,wehave reportedsnothertype of substrate. of which msctionsite a little remotefnnn the stereogeniccarbonatom.(a)Mumts.M.;AcbiwaK.; Tetmhedfvn Left, 1991.32.6763. (b)Ebike.H.;Temo.Y.;A&iwa.K.; TetrahedronLett,1991.32.5805.

11.

(R)-l(:[a]#’

+9.02 (c 0.6 EtOH) ‘H-NMR (CDC13) 6: 0.83-0.90(12H.m),LOO-l.80

(24H_m),2.25(3H.s),2.70(2H.ddJ=17Hz).6.91-7.54(3Hm).