An implicit functional representation of stress-strain behavior

An implicit functional representation of stress-strain behavior

MECH. RES. COMM. Vol. 5(4), 185-190, 1978. Pergamon Press. Printed in USA. AN IMPLICIT FUNCTIONAL REPRESENTATION OF STRESS-STRAIN BEHAVIOR K.P. W...

223KB Sizes 4 Downloads 39 Views

MECH. RES. COMM.

Vol. 5(4), 185-190, 1978.

Pergamon Press.

Printed in USA.

AN IMPLICIT FUNCTIONAL REPRESENTATION OF STRESS-STRAIN BEHAVIOR

K.P. Walker* and E. Krempl Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aeronautical Engineering & Mechanics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12181

(Received 23 March 1978; accepted for print 6 July 1978)

Introduction

In a previous note, "An Implicit Functional Theory of Viscoplasticity"

[i],

an integral representation of metallic material deformation behavior was developed.

We now proceed to specialize this theory to the infinitesimal iso-

thermal deformation of isotropic materials.

For the uniaxial case elastic

perfectly plastic and work-hardening behavior is shown to be part of this functional theory.

Analysis The constitutive equations appropriate to infinitesimal isothermal deformation may be obtained from equations

(5) of [i] by substituting de for ~ and ~ for E, respectively and by letting ~ = 0. The kernel J (Co, t - t')

in equation

(3) of

(i), (2), (3) and

[i] is assumed to be the constant Jo' this form being deemed

suitable at low homologous temperatures

[2].

We note that our theory has

separate repositories for plasticity phenomena, and for rate dependence

(the microstructure parameter R)

(the time dependence of the kernels).

For the purpose of demonstration we assume that the isotropic form of the fourth rank tensor G is given by

Pratt & Whitney Aircraft,

East Hartford,

Connecticut 06108.

oo95-6~15/78/o7oi-o1855o2.oo/o

Copyright

(e)

197S Pergamon P r e s s

186

K.P.

WALKER and E. KREMPL

Gijk~(R,R',R '~,~o, 2t- t' - t ~') = ~ (R,R',R 'j,8o~ 2t- t' - t '~)@ij@k£ + b (R, R'~ R '~,Oo, 2t- t' - t ~) (§ik$j£ + ~i~$jk) ,

(i)

and, as a particular form for the function ~ we choose ~ (R, R', R", ~o' 2t - t' - t '~) = le -[2g (R)-g (R')-g (R~')]e-7 (2t-tt-t H) + ~e -[2f(R)-f(R')-f(Rz')] in which ~

[i - e

-~(2t-t'-t ~)

] ,

(2)

f (R), g(R) and 7 are functions of @o~ not explicitly written and

f (R) > g(R) for 0 " R < ~

In (2), k is to be identified with the Lame

constant for the material under small elastic deformations;

f and g are func-

tions of the structure parameter R; and 7 is taken to be a constant.

A simi-

lar expression with different k, f. g and 7 might be adopted for the hereditary function ~.

For simplicity we assume ~ = I~-2 ~ <~ i.e., Poisson's

ratio ~ is constant

[3].

Although we shall make this simplifying assumption

it should be made clear that it is not necessary to do so. With these stipulations the governing equations for the homogeneous uniaxial state of stress are [4] t ~ [e-[g(R)-g(R')]e-~(t-tl ) +e-[f(R)-f(R')][l e-~(t-t' ) ] ~¢ii dt t ; ell = E j ] ~t' o (3) t (4)

~ dt' ; R = Jo ~[' a --~--~ ~t' - b !~t-TI~ t t

~O ~

= 1~ E ~! ~ ie-[2g(R)-g(R')-g(Ri')}e-~(2t-t'-tz' ) o

o

+ e-{mf (R)-f (R')-f (RH) ] [i- e -7(2t-t'-tH)]l Bell ~Cll~t"dt'dt H ;

(5)

~t' i i Ee-~(2t-t'-t~' ) + [ 1 e -~(2t-t'-tH) I ~CII ~ell po%0=~1 E ] ~t' ~t H dt'dtZ' " o

(6)

o

In these equations E is Young's modulus.

Note that equation

the equation for a three-parameter viscoelastic

solid

(3) is similar to

[5] in which the instant-

aneous and equilibrium elastic moduli have been replaced with functions which depend on the structure parameter R. tonic loading process equations

It is shown in [4] that for a slow mono-

(3) - (6) may be reduced to

IMPLICIT REPRESENTATION OF STRESS-STRAIN BEHAVIOR

i ~11 = E

eo

[f (R)-f (R') } -~ell -dt'; ~t'

187

(7)

t

=

el---

b

I

dt' ;

(S)

o t

t

Oo* = 71 E o~ e-[2f(Rl-f(R')-f(R'o ~ )} Be~t,llBell~t,,dt'dt" ; 1

(9)

2

po~ = ~ Eel1.

(i0)

For suitable values of a- b we can model typical rate-independent plasticity phenomena by proper selection of the function f(R).

First we assume that

f(R) = ~R~ where ~ is a constant. Substitution of (9) and (i0) into (8) gives~ loading

for this case and for monotonic

(delI 2 0) using ell = 0 and R = 0 for t = 0 t Bell ~j2-~o{ a e l l - b ~ e-~(R-R') dt'} o St'

R= Jo(a4~-bv~)=Jo

This is an implicit relation for the determination of R. to obtain a relation of the form ell = m(R). into

(7) yields O l l =

h (R).

(ii)

It can be solved

Substitution of this relation

The parameter R can be eliminated to yield the

desired stress-strain relation Eell

=

- -

a ~Ii

--

~ max

1

(12)

(% max

~o E where o

max

a~J

o

For the slope we obtain doll dell

aE (I -

Cll/Cmax)

(13)

a- b Oll/Oma x

Examination of (12) and (13) shows that for all values of a and b d°ll dell (Oll= 0) = E

and

d°ll dell

(Oll=~max)

= 0~

188

K.P.

W A L K E R and E. KREMPL

and that ~ii reaches Omax for large ell.

The shape of the s t r e s s - s t r a i n

d i a g r a m b e t w e e n ell = 0 and ~ii = ~max is d e t e r m i n e d by the values of a and b as shown in Fig. l. reproduce

For very small values of a - b equations

(12) and

(13)

elastic p e r f e c t l y plastic behavior.

To investigate stress-strain

the b e h a v i o r during u n l o a d i n g d i a g r a m equations

u n l o a d i n g history.

(7) - (I0) have to be solved for the loading-

Of p a r t i c u l a r

any point ~Ii on the u n l o a d i n g

from any point u °ii ~ ell o on a

interest

branch

is the slope during unloading.

[4]

doll

dR - -

dell

For Cll = 0

+ E.

(14)

GUll dell

(intercept with the e-axis)

we obtain the elastic

values of a and b. The slope at the point of u n l o a d i n g dR evaluating ~ at ~ii = ~ii" We obtain o[4] Ii d~ll de

(

O

(~ii=~ii)

For

= E

can be d e t e r m i n e d

by

(a - b)

max

1

slope for all

+

.

~o ii

Ii a+b

(15)

max

The slope at u n l o a d i n g values of

( a - b)

depends

close

therefore

to elastic

o on the ~ll ~ a and b.

unloading

is

obtained

F r o m the above it is clear that the choice of f(R) flat s t r e s s - s t r a i n

curve.

a - b m u s t be very small.

To approach

as seen

= ~ R leads to an u l t i m a t e l y

the e l a s t i c - p e r f e c t l y

In this c a s e , R would never grow

get only elastic behavior~

see e q u a t i o n

present

in the endochronic

theories

provide

for this flexibility

(12).

plastic b e h a v i o r

[3].

it

[4] and we would

Such a flexibility

Recent developments,

was not

however,

[6].

we show how this theory can be extended

To this end we select

in Fig.1.

A l t h o u g h we can make a - b as small as we please

can never be exactly zero.

For illustration

For small

to work-hardening.

[4] f (R) =

and solve the equations

(n I + n 2 R ) ~

given in Fig.2

(R+ i)

for completely

trolled condition at a strain amplitude of 1%.

(16)

reversed

Parameters

strain con-

are selected to

IMPLICIT REPRESENTATION OF STRESS-STRAIN BEHAVIOR

a-b .-a

a -b -= 0.001

189

0.4 a -b

0.95

1.0 0.9 0.8

///

0.7 O1 1

0.6

E

0.5 o.41 0.3

I .......

,~,

a-b -7"

0.2

: o.ool

0.1

0 . 5 1.0 1.5 2.0 ~ 5

3.0 3.5 4 . 0 4 . 5 5.0

Cll

Fig. 1.

STRESS-STRAIN

DIAGRAM

611 a

E with

E

Omax/E /

0"max/E = 1; E = 5; a -

1

40

20 10

zI 0

uJ Pr k-

lO

"°APL~G//

II

--20

-30 --40, -1.2

I -0.8

1 0.4

I 0

I 0.4

STRAIN Fig. 2.

~ = E 1 c + E2

/

STRAIN

HARDENING

HYSTERESIS

LOOPS

-{,(RI-, (R', I e

#, = '/2 ( E I + E 2) c 2 f(R)

offO

e

=

1

E1

=

27400

E2

-

17772600

Jo ~~ t ~ d t ' ;

, t = 72 E 1 c 2 + '/~ E 2

I 1.2

(%)

o

v

I 0.8

-t2,~I-,R')-,R")

= (n 1 + n 2 R ) l n

t a~ ae ()t'

__

C';')t" dt dt

__

r #t

;

(R+I).

a

=

.01

b

=

.005

n1

=

36

n2

=

4

190

K.P.

simulate steel.

W A L K E R and E. KREMPL

a strongly cyclic h a r d e n i n g b e h a v i o r The equations

were n u m e r i c a l l y

calculator

using a trapezoidal

Concluding

Remarks

The c o n t i n u o u s l y

rule.

integrated

The results

evolving m i c r o s t r u c t u r e

effects of p l a s t i c i t y

similar to type 304 stainless

in this theory.

on a p r o g r a m m a b l e are shown in Fig. 2.

parameter

It grows

pocket

is responsible

for the

slowly with d e f o r m a t i o n

upon

first loading and then more rapidly as loading proceeds.

Immediately

each successive

than before unload-

unloading

ing.

The d i s s i p a t i o n

i.e.,

during

initial

under fast loading equations

of plastic work into heat is small where R is small, loading and u n l o a d i n g

conditions

stress-strain

curves

for finite

the e q u i l i b r i u m loading

the stress

(3) - (6), by replacing

we assume that f(R) > g(R)

curves

the growth of R is much smaller

response

after

(instantaneous

rates of loading

It is also shown in

strain curve

f(R) with g(R)

7~ 0, these

stress-strain

[4].

is determined,

in equations

two functions

and equilibrium)~

form a limiting

Since

set of

with s t r e s s - s t r a i n

It is also possible

to be elastic by setting g(R)

from

(7) - (I0).

falling below the i n s t a n t a n e o u s

curves.

[4] that

and above

to assume

the fast

= 0.

Acknowledgement The research

reported

on in this paper was supported by the National

Science

Foundation.

References

[i] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

K.P. W a l k e r and E. Krempl, An Implicit Functional Theory of Viscoplasticity: preceding paper in this issue. E. Krempl, On the Interaction of Rate- and H i s t o r y - D e p e n d e n c e in Structural Metals, Acta M e c h a n i c a ~ 53 (1975). K.C. Valanis, On the Foundations of the E n d o c h r o n i c Theory of Plasticity, Archives of Mechanics 2 7 7 857 (1975). K.P. Walker~ Ph.D. Thesis, R e n s s e l a e r Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York (1976) . R.M. Christensen, "Theory of Viscoelasticity. An Introduction," Academic Press (1971). K.C. Valanis, A New Intrinsic Time Measure for the E n d o c h r o n i c Description of Plastic Behavior, D i v i s i o n of Materials Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, Report G-123-DME-77-003, April 1977.