An infrared spectroscopic study of some phosphine chalcogenide derivatives of chromium and tungsten hexacarbonyls

An infrared spectroscopic study of some phosphine chalcogenide derivatives of chromium and tungsten hexacarbonyls

INORG. NUCL. CHEM. LETTERS Vol. 9, pp. 941-945, 1973. Perganum Press. Printed in Great Britain. AN INFRARED SPECTROSCOPIC STUDY OF SOME PHOSPHIN...

176KB Sizes 0 Downloads 38 Views

INORG.

NUCL.

CHEM. LETTERS

Vol. 9, pp. 941-945, 1973.

Perganum Press.

Printed in Great Britain.

AN INFRARED SPECTROSCOPIC STUDY OF SOME PHOSPHINE CHALCOGENIDE DERIVATIVES OF CHROMIUMAND TUNGSTEN HEXACARBONYLS

P. M. Boorman , S. A. Clow, D. Ports and H. Wieser Department of Chemistry, The University of Calgary Calgary, Alberta, Canada (Receioed 10 April l ~ 3 )

The bonding in phosphine sulfidesand selenides has been of considerable interest in recent years (i). Likewise, the coordination properties of these compounds has attracted attention (2). However, most of these studies have related to their basicity and o-donor properties rather than to their possible ~-acceptor ability. Consequently, we report here the infrared spectroscopic properties of compounds of the type M(CO)5L, where H = Cr or W, and L = PhsPS(Se), CYsPS(Se), MesPS and (Me2N)sPS.

During the course of our work the complexes in which

L = Ph3PS and Me3PS were reported by Brodie and co-workers (3), but none of the other compounds has been previously described.

The present work is the

first detailed investigation of the ir spectra of complexes of this type.

Experimental

The compounds were prepared by UV photolysis of solutions of the appropriate ligand and metal carbonyl in tetrahydrofuran. analyses were obtained for all the new compounds.

Satisfactory elemental

Other synthetic methods

always gave rise to metal chalcogenides, and even the photolytic method gave rise to unstable oils with the ligands BusPS(Se) and (EtO)sPS , whereas PhsAsS and Ph3SbS yielded analytically pure samples of M(CO)sPh3As and M(CO)5PhsSb , respectively. Infrared spectra were carefully measured in hexane solution in 0 . 1 m m KBr solution cells, using a calibrated Perkin Elmer 621 spectrophotometer.

941

PHOSPHINE CHALCOGENIDE DERIVATIVES

942

VoL 9, No. 9

Infrared Spectra

In distinct contrast to previous work (3) we find that only in certain cases does the X3PS(Se) ligand cause a carbonyl spectrum (Table i) that deviates significantly from that expected for an idealized C~v mlcrosymmetry. ments are based on arguments presented by several authors (4,5,6).

Our assignThe compounds

containing Ph3PS , Ph3PSe and (Me2N)3PS all yield simple C4v spectra (2A I + E) although the infrared forbidden B! mode does sometimes occur very weakly.

In

other instances (L = Me3PS , Cy3PS(Se)) the E band is split, as implied by Brodie (3).

Another point of difference between our spectra and the spectrum previously

reported (3) is our characterization of free metal hexacarbonyls as decomposition products of the phosphine chalcogenide complexes.

Bands at 1984 cm -I (Cr com-

plexes) and 1890 cm -I (W complexes) appeared in spectra of the derivatives and these increased in intensity with time.

TABLE i

Solution (Hexane) Spectra of the Complexes M(CO)bL and their Assignments (on the basis of C~v Syam~etry) Carbonyl Stretching Vibrations (cm-I)

Compound

AI

(i)

BI

E

AI

(2)

Cr(CO)5SePPh 3

2059 m,sp

1979 w

1939 vs

1914 s,sp

Cr(CO)5SPPh 3

2063 m, sp

--

1947 s

1912 m,sp

W(CO)bSePPh 3

2066 m,sp

1975 w

1935 vs

1910 s,sp

W(CO)bSPPh 3

2068 m,sp

1977 w

1935 vs

1909 s,sp

Cr(CO)5SP(NMe2) 3 2062 m,sp

1980 m

1935 s,br

1909 s,sp

1922 s,br

1906 s,sp

W(CO)5SP(NMe2) 3

2068 m,sp

1975 m

W(CO)5SPMe 3

2070 m,sp

---

1939 s,sp 1924 s,sp

1908 s,sp

Cr(CO)bSPMe 3

2064 m,sp

1946 s,sp 1927 s,sp

1909 s,sp

W(CO)5SePCy 3

2065 m, sp

1975 m, sp

1935 s,sp 1922 s,sp

1906 s,sp

Cr(CO)bSePCy 3

2057 m,sp

1979 w

1941 s,sp 1925 s,sp

1910 s,sp

W(CO)5SPCy 3

2067 m,sp

1976 m,sp

1933 s,sp 1922 s,sp

1905 s,sp

Vol. 9, No. 9

PHOSPI']IINE CHALCOOENIDE DERIVATIVES

943

Bands associated with P = S(Se) stretching modes are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2

P = S(Se) Stretching Frequencies (IR) for M(CO)5L Complexes and Uncoordinated Ligands in Hexane Solutions

Compound

v~P = S~Se))

Compound

_

~P

- S~Se))

Cr(CO)sSePPh 3

544

W(CO)5SPMe 3

540

Cr(CO)sSPPh 3

600

Cr(CO)5SPMe 3

540

W(CO)5SePPh 3

543

Ph3PSe

564

W(C0)5SPPh 3

599

Ph3PS

645

Cr(CO) 5SP(Me2N)3

544

(Me2N)3PS

560

W(CO)5SP(Me2N) 3

545

Me3PS

566

The d e c r e a s e s reported (2).

for

i n ~ ( P = S) a n d ~(P = Se) a r e o f a s i m i l a r these

Surprisingly

ligands , though,

in adducts

with metals

magnitude

in positive

to those

oxidation

t h e c h a n g e i n v ( P = S) u p o n c o o r d i n a t i o n

states

o f He3PS

(-26 cm -I) is smaller than that of Ph3PS (A~ = -45 cm -I) even though Me3PS causes the E carbonyl mode to lose its degeneracy whereas Ph3PS does not,

A

likely explanation is that in the free PhsPS molecule there is a greater degree of d~ + pw interaction in the P = S bond, which is weakened upon coordination to the metal. series Ph3PS

Since the strength of such dw + p~ bonding decreases in the >

triphenyl case.

Me3PS

)

(Me2N)3PS ,

Av(P = S) is most pronounced in the

On this basis one would predict that metal-sulfur d~-d~

interaction would be rather limited, since this would tend to strengthen the P-S ~ bond. The u s e o f v i b r a t i o n a l metal-ligand tention

(7).

q-bonding

spectroscopic

in carbonyl

data

to examine the extent

complexes has been a matter

of

o f some c o n -

It seems clear that there is no simple way of identifying the

relative importance of o-donation and w-acceptamce of a ligand L.

However.

either carbonyl frequencies or Cotton-Kraihanzel (5) force constants may be

PHOSPHINE CHALCOGENIDE DERIVATIVES

944

Vol. 9, No. 9

used (7) as the basis for comparing the overall (e-~) donation from the ligand to the metal in a series of complexes M(CO)hL.

We have used the Sum of the C-K

stretching force constants as the basis for our comparisons since these reflect all the IR bands and act as a good confirmation of our band assignments. In Table 3 the ligands Ph3PS , Ph3PSe and (Me2N)3PS are placed in their relative positions in a series in which increasing amounts of charge are transferred from the ligand to the metal for the compounds W(CO)5L.

It will be noted that the

ligands occur above cyclohexylamine in the series for which compound no ~-bonding would be expected.

From this it may be implied that the chalcogenides do possess

some ~-acceptor characCer (8).

TABLE 3

Force Constants for W(CO)5L Complexes

Compound

kI

x

+ k2

ki

**

W(CO)sPPh3 #

15.58

15.85

0.30

W(CO)sSePPh 3

14.97

15.74

0.33

W(CO)5SPPh 3

14.89

15.78

0.33

W(CO)5SP(NMe2) 3

14.85

15.73

0.34

W(C0)5C6HIINH2 #

14.65

15.74

0.35

W(CO)5C2H50H#

14,53

15.73

0.35

W(CO)5(DMF) #

13.93

15.58

0.36

Force constants obtained from Ref. 8. x

k I refers to CO trans to L.

+

k 2 refers to CO cis to L.

**

K i refers to CO stretch-stretch interaction constant.

The relative (a-~) donor characters of all of the R3PX llgands studied (including those which gave more complex spectra), may be compared on the basis of the averaged stretching frequencies for the 2Almodes for both W and Cr carbonyls,

The approximate order of the llgands is: -

Cy3PSe > Cy3PS > (Me2N)3PS ~ Ph3PSe ~ Me3PS > Ph3PS.

Vol. 9, No. 9

PHOSPHINE CHALCOGENIDE DERIVATIVES

945

There seems to be no simple correlation between this sequence and the complexity of the carbonyl spectra, nor with the relative changes in the v(PS) stretching frequencies.

For these reasons we are presently engaged in x-ray

crystallographic studies of selected compounds in an attempt to gain further insight into the problem. We thank the National Research Council of Canada for financial support, and H$ss V. Miasek for the preparation of two of the complexes.

References

i.

See for example R. F. HUDSON, Structure and Mechanism in Organophosphorus Chemistry, Chapter 3 Academic Press, New York (1965).

2.

N.M.

KARAYANNIS, C. M. MIICULSKI and L. L. PYTLEWSKI, Inorg. Chim. Acta.

Rev., 5, 82 (1971). 3.

E. W. AINSCOUGH, A. M. BRODIE and A. R. FURNESS, Chem. Co~anun., 1357 (1971).

4.

L. E. ORGEL, Inorg. Chem., I, 25 (1962).

5.

F. A. COTTON and C. S. KRAIHANZEL, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 84, 4432 (1962).

6.

F. A. COTTON and C. S. KRAIHANZEL, Inorg. Chem., 2, 533 (1963).

7.

L. M. HAINES and M. H. B. STIDDARD, Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem., 12, 53

(1969). 8.

F. A. COTTON, I n o r g . Chem., 3, 702 (1968).