JOURNAL
OF NUCLEAR
AN INVESTIGATION URANIUM
24
MATERIALS
(1967)
95-100.
OF THE ALUMINIUM-RICH
0 NORTH-HOLLAND
The aluminium-rich
F. DIELS
Received
paper,
the aluminium-rich freezing Al/24% X-ray
of some
characteristics thermal
Al/U/Dy
ternary
and
and
alloys
the
as UaDy~Allls.
A
Les contours ont
pseudobinery
(cubic Cl5 MgCua type) was found.
de
3 solutions
(Dy, U)A14, (Dy, U)Als
Es ist wie beim
a region of insolubility
in the liquid and
solid state was delineated.
of three
Schnitt
des Systems were found
in equilibrium with the aluminium-rich existence
to be
solid solution.
intermetallic
und
solid solutions
Comme dans le CELS du systbme U/Al/Sm une section
du coin riche en aluminium BtB d&term&&e solidific&ion careot&istiques dans
la
ainsi
de
la
A1/24%
suite
alliages
die
U.
des
&apes et
m&hodes
(Teil I) ein isosind
einiger terniirer Legierungen von
y. U ermittelt
wurden
mikrografische, Methoden
U/Al/Dy-
worden. Dabei
rCintgenograf&che und ther-
sowie
Untersueh~gen
mit
einer
angewendet. worden.
Verbindung
(MgCun-Typ,
kubisch,
und
IGslichkeitsgebiet
Legierungen im
fliissigen
System
C1.5) ist gefunden
worden. Es wurden die Phasengrenzen dreiphasigen
ist UsDy3
Ein pseudobiniires
de
micro-
Ecke
worden. Weiter
les
der ein-, zwei-
best,immt;
sin
Un-
und
festen
Zustand
drei
intermetsllische
wurde abgegrenzt. Es
wurde
Verbindungen reichen
utilisees dans cette Btude. tern&e
bestimmt
mische
DyAls-UAl2
a
radiocristallographiques, l’analyse et et la microsonde Blectronique ont 6%
Un oompos& interm&allique
U/Al/Sm
Als ternlire intermetallische
des alliages Al/U/Dy Los
a BtB trouv&.
Herstellungseigenschaften
Al15 identifiziert
& 600” C
ternaires
System
Legierungen mit Al/24
discute dans
isotherme
du syst&me Al/U/Dy
de fabrication
region
graphiques thermique
que
quelques
interm&alliques
(bei 600” C) in der Al-reichen
U/Al/Dy
~ikrosonde partie,
solides
et (Dy, U)Alg
die E~t~rr~gsp~te
(Dy, U)Ala, (Dy, U)Al3 and (Dy, U)Ala was esDablished.
la premiere
en
The phase bounthermer
The
ont 6% trouv&
DyAlz-UAl2
determined;
compounds
bi-
Bquilibre avec la solution solid@ riche en aluminium.
daries of the single-, two- and three-phase alloys were
Three intermetdlic
mono-,
region d’in-
liquide, eomme dans 1’6tat solide,
Trois compost% interm6talliques
analysis
was identified
system
Une
a BtP. d&imitAe.
L’existenee
compound
des domaines
Btti dhterminbes.
solubilit& dana I’&&
were used in this investigation. One ternary intermetallic
(de structure eubique de type C 15 Mg Cuz)
et triphas&
Micrographic and
microprobe
1967
a 6tB trouv&
in the
system
MOE, Belgium
Dy Al&Ala
system,
dloys
of Al/U/Dy
U region were investigated. methods,
discussed in the
section at 600” C of
corner of the
sequence
fabric&ion
system
an isothermal
9 June
ternary
SYSTEMS
and A. COOLS
Stud~iecentrum voor h’ernenergie,
As in the cese of U/Al/Sm
TERNARY
alloys in the AI-Dy-U
I?. CASTEELS,
CO., AMSTERDAM
ALLOYS IN THE ALUMINIUM-SAMARIUM-
AND ALU~NIUM-DYSPROSIUM-URANIUM
II.
preceding
PUBLISRINCl
drei
a 6th identifie
gefunden, sich
im
Mischkristallen
intermetallischen
dess
Gleichgewicht
mit
befinden.
Existenz
Die
Verbindungen
Alvon
(U, Dy)Al4,
comme &ant UgDys Al15. Un systbme pseudo-binaire
(U, Dy)Ala
1.
The possible existence of the following compounds has been mentioned: DyAL, DyAls, DyA12, DyAl, DysA12 and DysAl. Moriarty and Baenziger 2) report the existence of the compounds Dy3Al2, DyAl, DyA12 and
In~odu~tion
and literature
review
As already mentioned in part one, the purpose of this work is the incorporation of burnable poisons in Al/U fuel alloys for materials testing reactors. 95
und (U, Dy)Ah
den
wurde nachgewiesen.
96
I?. CASTEELS
DyAle
in the
d~Tsprosium-aluminium
DyAlz has a cubic ClSMgCuz lattice
parameter
a= 7.840
system.
structure A 3). The
with a crystal
structures of DyAl4, DyAl and DyaAl~ are not mentioned in these two reports. An
intermetallic
hexagonal
compound
structure was reported
DyAlg
with
by Baenziger
ET
AL.
Results and discussion
3. 3.1.
MICROGRAPHY
AND
X-RAY
RESULTS
The results are summarized in fig. 1. The phases in equilibrium with the aluminium-rich solid
solution
microstructural
were
investigated
and microprobe
by
X-ray,
analysis, from
et al. 4). This compound has a structure isomorphous with NisTi; the lattice parameters calculated a=6.097
from powder diagrams of DyAls are d;
c=9.534
A.
Kato et al. 5) reported the existence of a DysAl compound. This compound exists in two modi~~ations: a and p DysAl. According to the results of Buschow 6) the DyAl compound has an orthorhombic structure with a=5.604 8; b=5.822 8; c= 11.639 A; the DysAlz compound fits a hexagonal symmetry with a=%.17 8; c=7.523 8. As mentioned in part one, three intermetallic compounds have been reported in the aluminium-uranium binary system : UAl4 (orthorhombic structure) UAl3 (AU&S structure) and UAla (MgCuz structure). A transformation near the Al/UAl4 eutectic temperature of 646” C has been observed in the UAl4 intermetalli~ compound by Runnalls and Boucher I). This transformation involves the rearrangement or clustering of vacancies. In an investigation of the aluminium-rich part 7) equilibrium of the aluminium-dysprosi~lm diagram, the existence of a /3 DyAl3 intermetallic compound has been observed. According to Van Vueht et al. 9), this compound fits a rhonlbohe~al symmetry. Dysprosium and uranium are mutually quite insoluble 2.
in the liquid
and solid states.
Experimental
The base materials used in this work have purities of 99.995% (Al) 99.8% (Dy) and 99.98% (U). The main impurities are identified as Cu, Fe and Ng in aluminium ; Ca, Fe, Mg and Ta in dysprosium; Al, B, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mg and Pb in uranium. The experimental techniques have already been mentioned in part one.
100
Fig.
wi,
A,
1.
80
Isot,hermal
60
se&ion
100
w,. oy
(at 600 “C) in t,he du-
minium-~Al~-D~Al~
system.
which it may be concluded that the aluminiumrich solid solution is in equilibrium with three intermetallic compounds : {Dy, U)Al4, X(A1/34.8% U/35.5% Dy), * /?(Dy, U)Als and with 2 two-phase mixtures ((Dyt UW4; XI and (X; ,&Dy, U) &I. (Dy, U) Ale was found to be stable up to 20% addition of dysprosium to UA14. The X-ray powder data for the X compound with hexagonal symmetry and parameters CL=6.05 if, c = 14.35 A are given in table 1. The proposed composition for this new compound is U2Dy~A115. Uranium can be incorporated up to 14% in solid solution in the b DyA13 compound. Using the etching techniques mentioned in part one, the (U, Dy)A14 compound can be identified by its blue green colour. Under identical etching conditions the X-phase (U2DysAl1~) and the /3(Dy, U)Als phases are brown; it is very difficult to make the distinction between *
All
percent.
percentage
values
are
quoted
in weight
AN
INVESTIGATION TABLE
X-ray
OF
THE
them,
1
powderd&ta,forX compound UaDy3Alls (CuKa
radiation). (sir+&,)
Hexagonal
* lo4
lattice (a =6.05
(sira*
A; c = 14.35 A).
334
331
479
476
(103)
650
648
680
677;
(110) (111); (104)
895
893
(201)
981
979
(202)
1044
1037
(006)
1124
1123
(203)
1327
1325
(204)
1539
1541
(211)
1578
1584
1628
1627;
1683
1685
(116)
1768
1771
(213)
1936
1944
1964
1973;
1973
2055
2060; 2059;
2059
2270
2279
1627
slightly
microstructure
of
(205) (212); (107)
(300) (301); (214) (108);(302);
states has been observed in the Al/U/Dy system ; this range is indicated in fig. 1.
MELTING
POINTS AND
During thermal
(117)
(207) (216); (109)
2549; 2592
2621
2621
2707
2707;
2708
(221) (222); (208)
2923;
2924
(312)
(220)
-
etches
FREEZING
PHENOMENA
2582
2919
p(Dy, U)Als
lighter than the X-phase. Figs. 2 and 3 show the
3.2.
2541
2549
the
97
II
Al, (U, Dy)A4 and X, the second one, Al, p(Dy, U)Als and X. An immiscibility gap in the liquid and solid
(101) (102) 677
but
ALLOYS,
ternary three phase alloys, the first one contains
wc) * 104 245
246
ALTJMINIUM-RICH
X(U3
analysis experiments
it was
noticed that the addition of dysprosium to aluminium-uranium alloys affects on the UA14 peritectic temperature. Very small thermal arrests were stated in the region of the peritectic temperature for alloys containing small additions of dysprosium. An appreciable influence on the microstructure of aluminium-uranium alloys with additions of dysprosium has been observed. As in the case of the aluminium/ uranium/samarium system, no irregularities in the melting points could be observed. Additions of dysprosium to aluminium-uranium alloys
Dys
Us)
Al
(DyU)A14
Fig.
2.
Microstructure
of ternary
aluminium-24% +X+(Dy,
dysprosium-38%
U)A14 (blue-green).
uranium x 750
alloy:
Al (white, overetched)
98
I?. OASTEELS Al
Fig.
3.
Microstructure
ET
B(Dy, U) Al3
of t,cr-nary aluminium-22%
X
AL.
(Ua Dys Al15)
umnium-38~0
dysprosium
alloy:
aluminium +X
-f-@$Als
x 7.50
influence the melting points of the aluminiumuranium alloys (table 2) only slightly. The distribution of dysprosium and uranium in the (U, Dy)Ala compound is of interest with respect to the fabrication of nuclear fuel elements. As indicated in fig. 4, which gives the uranium and dysprosium contents in the (Dy, U)Al4 needles of a A1/24% U/5”/ Dy alloy, after heat treatment of 30 h at 600" C a quite
homogeneous distribution of the uranium dysprosium atoms was observed within needles. 3.3. QUATERNARY
ALLOYS
AND
FABIUOATION
TESTS It may be interesting to combine the effect of two burnable poisons. Quaternary alloys have been prepaxed and fig. 5 indicates that a
TABLE 2 Results
of thermal
analysis
Alloy composition (%)
Al/24
U/O.5 Dy
Al/30
U/Z
Dy
Al,‘20 U/G Al/25 U/5
Dy Dy
of aluminium-rich
Al/U/Dy
alloys.
(Cooling rate:
/ Melting point i to cj ~ “‘“F”
~~~~~~
915
652
_
678
630
_ 650
630 630
845
_
628
1109
_
628
992
687
630
I
630
Al/5
U/Z0
Dy
Al/10
U/40
Dy
/ ! j 1 i
AIf
U/l0
Dy
’
Al/20
U/25
Dy
1109
-
628
Al,‘5
U/l0
Dy
680
_
628
Al/20
U/IO
Dy
Al/15
U/l0
Dy
/ 1
836 942
and the
i
862
628
848
630
5” Cjmin).
AN 1
U intensity
L
I
INVESTIGATION
and
I
OF
THE
ALUMINIUM-RICH
1 Dy intensity
background
and
ALLOYS,
II
background
I Distance
Fig.
4.
Uranium and dysprosium
Distance
distribution throughout
after a heat treatment
U
intcnslty
and
background
I
Sm
lntenslty
the (Dy, U)Ala phase of an A1/24%
and
background
5.
Uranium-dysprosium-samarium
Dy alloy
,
Dy
inlcnsity
and
backgroun;d
A
I
Distance
Distance
Fig.
U/5%
of 30 h at 600 “C.
distribution in an A1/24%
complete homogeneity between uranium, dysprosium and samarium can be reached in the (Dy, U, Sm)Ald needles. Ternary and quaternary alloy slabs were cast in the region of 24% uranium and the order of 1% rare earth. These castings were easier to obtain than the ones with straight Al/24% U alloy: grains are finer and the uranium distribution is better. No appreciable number of pores [such as was found by Daniel et al. *)
U/1.05%
Sm/0.515%
Dy alloy.
in castings of A1/35% U/3% Gd alloys] could be detected by radiography. These slabs were hot-rolled at 600” C; the deformation characteristics of the ternary and quaternary alloys were better than those of straight Al/24% U alloy, as judged by the amount of edge cracks produced during rolling. Fig. 6 shows the homogeneity of the uranium distribution in an M/24% U/0.8% Sm rolled plate.
F.
100
CASTEELS
ET
AL.
may be concluded dysprosium-uranium uranium
that
ternary
alloys
and dysprosium
aluminium-
with
convenient
distribution
can be
obtained. Several conclusions can be drawn from the investigation of the Al/U/Dy system: the possibility
of casting and fabricating
Al/U/Dy
alloys in the A1/24% U region without additional fabrication difficulties, the existence of a (U, Dy)Ald solid solution up to 20% additions of dysprosium binary
and the existence of the pseudo-
UAlz-DyAlz
system.
References ‘)
0.
J.
AIME
7
C.
Runnals
and
(1965)
1726
233
J. Moriarty
data
3) J. H. Wernick 218
5) H. Kato Fig. 6. Autoradiograph fuel
of a rolled Al,‘24(;i, U/0.X?;, plate. x 1
Sm
4.
Conclusions
From micrographic and X-ray investigations and from thermal and microprobe analysis it
State
Trans.
Univ.
Iowa,
S. Geller,
Trans.
Met.
Sot.
866
and J. J. Hegenbarth,
Acta
Cryst.
620 and
USBM-U-1031
M.
J.
Copeland,
USAEC
Report,
(1963)
“1 K. H. J. Buschow, (1965)
Boucher,
(1959)
and
(1964)
4) N. C. Baenziger 17 (1964)
R.
and N. Baenziger,
prepublication AIME
R.
J.
Less
Common
Metals
8
209
‘) F. Casteels, J. Less Common Metals 12 (1967) 210 9 N. Daniel et al., USAEC Report, BMI 1388 (1959) g, J. H. N. van Vucht et al., J. Less Common Metals
10 (1965)
98