Vol.
23,
No.
4, 1966
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
AN N-ACETYLATED
RESEARCH
PEPIIDE
COMMUNICATIONS
CHAIN
IN TROPOMYOSIN.
R. E. Alving,
E. Moczar
and K. Laki
National Institute of Arthritis and Metabolic Diseases National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Bethesda, Maryland 20014
ReceivedApril15, It
1966
has been reported
from
1961)
that
by the application
tamic
acid
could
be identified
tropomyosin
B.
rabbit's
Our experiments, tropomyosin residues
(Kominz
myosin
consisted
reported
that
p-mercapto weight also
half
suggested
tropomyosin tain
that
an N-terminal
rabbit pronase
lated
which
methionine
reduce
of
non-reactive
communication,
we report
contained in equal
acetic quantities.
containing
exhibited
a molecular
molecule.
This
finding
two chains.
But
chains
our findings
must
finding
which
peptide
a tripeptide
aspartic This
540
(Woods 1965)
if con-
to dinitrofluorobenzene.
tropomyosin, acid,
that
tropo-
solution
B has an N-acetylated of
that
one of the
residue
digestion
urea
contained
two chains,
of
as C-terminal
Recently,
native
glu-
residue
indicated
S-S bonds)
of the
and Kominz,
A suggested
chains.
tropomyosin
tropomyosin
After
This
B in 8 molar
of that
consists
In this that
(to
N-terminal
and serine
1957).
tropomyosin
(Saad
DNPB method,
carboxypeptidase
of two peptide
ethanol
about
as the
isoleucine
et al.,
laboratory
of Sanger's
using
B contained
this
acid, gives
show
chain. was iso
alanine further
and
Vol.
23,
No.
4, 1966
BIOCHEMICAL
support
to the
one starting lated
idea
with
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
that
tropomyosin
glutamic
acid,
RESEARCH
contains the
other
COMMUNICATIONS
two peptide one with
chains;
an acety-
residue. For
pared
these
experiments,
according
to Bailey
and stored
in the
was carried
out
justed
tropomyosin After
rechromatographed
peak 1.3
N.
Acid
(in
10% methionine). using acids
analyzer.
the
I) the
acetylated
yielded
aspartic
acid
column
determined of
the
of the from
and
by gas chroma1964).
peptide
The
amino
acid
yielded
I.
acetylated
tripeptide
tropomyosin. ~1 moles per u mole of myosin digested.
Residues acid
0.66
Alanine
0.61
Methionine
0.55
Acetic
alanine
sulfoxide
automatic
acetylated
roughly acid,
(Jackson,
by a Spinco
cycle,
collected.
peak
a sebacic
Components
were
of the
was determined
was
formate
concentration
acid
Hydrazinolysis
peptides
in the
Acetic
were
(by weight).
acid
acid,
1 mg
Dowex 50 col-
of 90% methionine
Table
Aspartic
through
column
ad-
contained
formic
of acetic form
mixture,
48 hours,
Two ml samples
hydrolysis
muscle by pronase
digestion
was passed
when the
(Table
and methionine
amino
for
was pre-
skeletal
in a 60 to 1 ratio
gradient.
came out
amounts
tography
the
25'C
containing
acid
rabbit
purity
The digestion
on Dowex 1 (X-8)
a formic
The main
equal
at
mixture
effluent,
from
way:
per ml and pronase
umn and the
reached
following
the
of high
state.
and kept
digestion,
using
(1948)
lyophilized
the
to pH 8.0
tropomyosin
acid
0.71
541
tropo-
Vol. 23, No. 4, 1966
BIOCHEMICAL
alanine,
showing
of this
tripeptide.
amino
acids With
that
teins,
actin
1966),
myosin
growing
class
finding (Alving (Offer, of
amino
The actual
remains the
this
AND BIOPHYSICAL
acid
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
is the
sequence
C-terminal
of the
residue
other
two
muscle
pro-
to be established. reported
here,
all
and Laki,
1966,
Gaetjens
1965)
proteins
and tropomyosin that
have
three
and Barany, now belong
an acetylated
N-terminus.
REFERENCES Alving, R. E. and Iaki, K., Fed. Proc., 3 223 (1966). Bailey, K., Biochem. J., 43, 271 (1948). Gaetjens, E. and Barany, IL, Fed. Proc. 3 223 (1966). Jackson, R. B., J. Chromatography, & 306 (1964). Kominz, D. R., Saad, F., Gladner, J. A. and Iaki, K., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 2 16 (1957). Offer, G. W., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 111, 191 (1965). Saad, F. M. and Kominz, D. R., Arch. Biochem. Bio92 541 (1961). Phys., 207, 82 (1965). Woods, E. E, Nature,
542
to the
Vol.
23,
Nlo. 4, 1966
BIOCHEMICAL
INTERSPECIES
AND
TRANSFORMATION
BETWEEN
BACILLUS
Ivan
D.
S.
Army
1.
Received
Goldberg,
Dubnau --subtilis
and
g.
(1965)
system have
low
that
been
able
di.fference
in
efficiency
as
specific
transformants
the
transformants specific
Maryland
with
only
-1
this
the
the
resiswith
a
and
we
least
a
of
When number
times
the
on
number
number
the
A loo-fold the
recipient
the
DNA.
lo-'
work
at
DNA,
times
to
transformation.
as
subtilis to
able
depending
homologous B.
10
-4
were
transformation
heterologous 10
a strep-
streptomycin
indicates
licheniformis
of
to
reciprocal
B.
from they
confirmed
transformation,
B.
isolated
subtilis
of
between
direcand
of
2.
inter-
intraspecific B.
of
licheniformis interspecific
number
of
intra-
transformants.
3.
were
AND
Thorne
Frederick,
DNA
crosses
transform
was
-B.
the
MATERIALS
g-
B.
Detrick,
percent
perform
was
obtained to
higher
With source
transformants used
Curtis
licheniformis,
reciprocal
cross.
--subtilis
was
SUBTILIS
transformation
We have
to
the
DNA
B. of
a much
of
the
of
frequency.
comparison
of
and
Using
strain
gives
also
ti.on
reported
strain
a
Gwinn Fort
licheniformis.
a sensitive at
D.
Center,
al.
tc'mycin-resistant
tance
BACILLUS
COMMUNICATIONS
15, 1966 et
transform
RESEARCH
LICHENIFORMIS
Darrel
Biological
April
BIOPHYSICAL
subtilis
subtilis obtained
W168 168
-ind-. from
was g.
C.
G.
AND
isolated
METHODS as
licheniformis Leonard.
a spontaneous 9945A
g.
543
subtilis
revertant
Ml8 SB-1
s-
and his-,
of Ml7 -ind-
-adwas
Vol. 23, No. 4, 1966
BIOCHEMICAL
obtained
from
tomycin
sulfate
DNA
was
E.
of
by
subtilis
168
tially (1961).
10
DNA
treatment
(Millipore
-ind-
HA
plates
then biotic
and
marker
were
the
samples
0.45
cl).
to
83
agar.
With
agar on
2 hours
exposure
amino tomycin plemented
grow to
minimal
10 acid
1 mg/ml
the agar for
marker. with
on
the
prior
supplemented
with
40
expression
both
of g.
-B.
subtilis
tryptophan
SB-1, and
544
histidine
at
37
C.
not
be
allowed
but
used.
transfer
to
pen-
attained
normal it
was
that
killed
after by
of
transformed minimal
difficult
colonies
overcome
at
on
express
were
was
When
to
Thus
the
Anti-
sulfate.
could
micrograms/ml
subtilis
(Difco
agar
to
the
were
done
and
problem
allow
to
was
transformants
This
time
expression
never
plates
to agar.
agar
plates.
expression
After
membranes
were
antibiotic.
With
the
the
for
+ 0.75%
incubation
colonies
true
on
filters
streptomycin
hours'
medium the
between
to
suitable
penassay
this
scored
transferred
media
and
streptomycin-containing
differentiate
a
recipient
Spizizen
membrane
penassay
48
essen-
way.
then
transformants on
were
following
were
subtilis,
+ streptomycin, the
started
g.
as
streptomycin
than
+
after
used
the
expressed
agar)
by and
onto
containing
scored was
subtilis
size
plates
were g.
transformed
growth
become
+ 0.75%
were
licheniformis
assay
in
C for
&-
Transformants
filtered
37
U.V. Com-
(1965).
(1966)).
membranes
to
(1961). Ml7
Mattheis
markers
scored
at
and
Anagnostopoulos
Stull
The
incubated
to
Transformants
more
by
strep-
spores
Marmur
arg-
were
streptomycin-free
Medium
g.
and
his-
were
of
Ml8
auxotrophic
(Thorne
marker
penassay
z-,
described
transferred
for
SB-1
1 rag/ml of
procedure
Leonard
for
were
streptomycin
2.
of
and
containing plates
the
to
exposure
99458
procedure
agar
streptomycin
following to
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
resistant
licheniformis
procedures
the
The
isolated
Transformants
minimal
to
g.
the
the
Mutants
according
cells
prepared
Nester.
were
extracted
petent
If
W.
AND BIOPHYSICAL
the for 10 was
a concentration
had
using required the
strepsup-
Vol. 23, No. 4, 1966
of
40
agar
BIOCHEMICAL
micrograms/ml. was
due
medium,
We
to
the
feel
extremely
resulting
in
inhibited
that
AND BIOPHYSICAL
the
a heavy growth
that
our
fast
growth
difficulty
the
with
of
background of
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
of
g.
penassay
subtilis
on
this
non-transformed
cells
transformants.
RESULTS In of
order
to
obtain
transformants
sary
to
for
determine
marker.
Under
--subtilis
became
sence
of
sion.
Table
tion
between
for
used,
expressed
done
subsequent
under
conditions results
-B.
and
g.
the
intraspecific
transformation.
This
the
interspecific
transformation
systems
the
difference
2.
subtilis->
2.
the
intraspecific
10
thousand-fold.
number 10-l
of to
could
be
with among various
times It
in
all
Dubnau
et
number
should
cases.
transferred
them
other
hand, -B.
the
None between
al.
(1965),
streptomycin
species
of
in
noted of the
who
was
significantly
is
a
resistance,
could
Bacillus.
545
by
Dubnau
the
date.
However,
obtained
in
cross
was
cross,
transformants
was
only be
the only
subtilis->
saturating
II.
levels markers is certain
transferred
all
interspecific
reciprocal
This
than to
number
B.
al.
common
licheniformis
the
et
lower
to
auxotrophic
that
expres-
intraspecific
feature
the
2 species. found
ab-
transforma-
is
the
in that
the
maximum
shown
subtilis
obtained be
gave
in
2.
the
B.
transformation
and
licheniformis-> the
in
reported
cross
this and
growth
transformants
licheniformis->
cross. used
of
licheniformis
On
B.
--subtilis
number
2.
162
were
the
necesof
and
As
DNA.
first
interspecific
transformation
in
of
that of
was
numbers
licheniformis
licheniformis
homologous
interspecific
-B.
All
1).
the
expression
6 hr
(fig.
subtilis
the
both
of it
after
the
using the
required
1 indicates
transformation (1965)
marker,
conditions
fully
were
streptomycin
time
streptomycin
experiments
measurement
the
the the
a meaningful
of tested
in
agreement markers, between
DNA
Vol.
23,
No.
4, 1966
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
DISCUSSION We have
demonstrated
directions
between
calculated
from
of
3 to
1.
and
a difference
Goldberg
Ravin
(1965)
in
reciprocal
obtained
Interspecific
transformation
with
T m (Gwinn,
transformation TABLE
2 species
Chen
4%.
interspecific
and
in
Thorne,
compared
the
crosses
transformation
in
between
GC content
unpublished
results)
efficiencies
of
between
2.
both
pneumo-
subtilis
and
g.
licheniformis.
Recipients 2. licheniformis 99458 M-18 DNA
source
(1.7
x
lo"",
(2.6
Transformants
per
g. subtilis w-168 sr
1.1
x
lo2
g. licheniformis 99458sr
1.2
x
lo6
subtilis
source
2.0
x
Transformants
10
x
x lo6
J!j. licheniformis 99458s=
1.7
x
105
x
lo1
6.5
x
LO5
subtilis
x
<
3.2
+
10
*
10
(his-,
lo6
Jo&
per
ml
his+ -
2.4
x
lo6
2.3
x lo4
)
x log)
Sr
lo6
+
x
Transformants
ml
ml
<
SB-1 (2.0
2.3
per -ad
4.8
log)
-ind
2.9
lo6
g.
per
(ad-) -
log)
Transformants
(&-)
Sr g. subtilis W-168 sr
x
Sr
<
168
(2.9 DNA
ml 3'
Sr
2.
g, licheniformis 994512 M-17
(arg-)
1.2
x
<
-ind lo6
10
8.0
+
x lo5
<
10
All the other Numbers in parentheses are numbers of recipient cells/ml. numbers in the table refer to numbers of transformants per ml. The concentration DNA was 22 pg/ml; that of B. licheniformis DNA was 22.5 @g/ml. of B. subtilis Botk levels were saturating for intraspecific and interspecific transformations. Cells transformed to streptomycin resistance (Sr) were scored on penassay agar Cells transformed to prototrophy were containing 1 mg/ml streptomycin sulfate. scored on minimal 10 agar. With 2. subtilis SB-1, transformants for the histidine marker were scored on minimal 10 + 40 pg/ml L-tryptophan and transformants for the indole marker were scored on minimal 10 + 40 Kg/ml L-histidine. Untreated cells and cells treated with DNA, that had been preincubated with 100 pg/ml deoxyribonuclease (Worthington) were run as controls in all experiments.
546
Vol. 23, No. 4, 1966
BIOCHEMICAL
FIGURE 1.
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Time required for expression of streptomycin resistance by JJ. subtilis and B. licheniformis interspecific transformants.
with
lis cells transformed DNA of 2. licheniformis
g. licheniformis cells formed with DNA of g.
60
120
180 240 300 Time (min)
360 420
transsubtilis
480
Millipore filters were incubated on streptomycin-free media for the times indicated and they were then transferred to plates of penassay agar containing 1 mg of streptomycin sulfate per ml. Complete procedure as in text. coccus
and the
resistance
Challis
marker.
strain They
found
transformation
to be much more
They
suggested
that
grated
into
DNA into likely
the
the
the
Streptococcus
the
genome of
efficient
in our
system
the
->
than
the
streptomycin
Streptococcus reciprocal
DNA was more easily
Streptococcus genome.
for
pneumococcus
pneumococcal
pneumococcal
possibility
of
than
We have that
was the not
-B. subtilis
cross. inte-
streptococcal
eliminated can take
the
un-
up -B.
Vol. 23, No. 4, 1966
BIOCHEMICAL
licheniformis up
DNA
subtilis
2.
DNA.
a more
efficient
Boyer,
1964)
than
basis
of
on
the
a small the
ported
core
is
of
of
that
is
This
streptomycin
intraspecific
transformation the
core
would
hypothesis.
nucleotides
are
nucleotides
adjacent
to
those
frequency
of
transformation
the
interspecific
affect
the
1958),
thus
lowering
We wish T.
Bryan
and
involved
in
to
acknowledge
R.
Gregoire.
both
that
the
lower
than
the
seem,
at
the
first
These
to that efficiency
efficiency glance,
same
recombinations.
of to
that
argue
sequences
of
However, a given
of
inter-
resistant
fact
determining
re-
a conserved
marker
the
as
Bacillus. -~
the
Presumably
(1965)
well
relatively
The
that
al.
Bacillus
include
resistance. is
of
genus is
suggested
conserved
et as
species the
has
studies are
take
1962;
(1965)
hybridization
would
transformation
Dussoix,
Dubnau
that core
and
sequences
in
material
licheniformis
hybridization
several
there
change.
interspecific
against
acid
can
-B.
Igarashi
Bacillus.
among
genetic
evolutionary
and
nucleotide genus
licheniformis that
DNA-RNA
the
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
(Arber
Doi
nucleic
stable
possible
subtilis.
identical
suggested
determines
also
II.
mechanism
transformation
of
than
interspecies
interspecific
authors
of
It
g.
members
specific
efficiently
restriction
number
among
more
AND BIOPHYSICAL
marker marker
the might
(Shaeffer,
efficiency. able
technical
assistance
of
REFEERENCES Anagnostopoulos, Arber, W. and Boyer, H., J. Chen, Kuo-Chun, Doi, R. H. and Dubnau, D., I. Sci. U.S. Leonard, C. G. Marmur, J., J. Shaeffer, P., Thorne, C. B.
C. and J. Spizizen, J. Bacterial. s, 741 (1961). D. Dussoix, J. Mol. Biol. 1, 18 (1962). Bacterial. E, 1652 (1964). and A. W. Ravin, Genetics 52, 434 (1965). R. T. Igarashi, J. Bacterial. 90, 384 (1965). Smith, P. Morel1 and J. Marmur, Proc. Natl. Acad. Ift, 491 (1965). and M. J. Mattheis, J. Bacterial. 90, 558 (1965). Mol. Biol. 2, 208 (1961). Symp. Sot. Exptl. Biol. 12, 60 (1958). and H. B. Stull, J. Bacterial. 3, 1012 (1966).
548