Tetrahedron
Printed
AN
Letters
in Great
No.48,
OPTICALLY
PURE By
Department
5985-5989,
SEQUENCE
DeLos of
Florida
pp.
Britain.
F.
State
cri sequence
methods peptide
POLY.
Norman
Institute
F.
of
29
have
recently
polymers
Ltd.
GLY.
PHE.
Estrin Biophysics U.
S.
A.
1966)
been
based
GLY.
Florida,
August
Press
Molecular
Tallahassee,
(Received Efficient
and
and
University,
Peqmm
PEPTIDE,
DeTar
Chemistry
1966.
I
on
described
the
for
the
polymerization
synthesis
of
“active”
::: esters (I)
eq.
1 (1-3).
The
generality
of
the
polymerization
HBr.H.Asp(OCH3).Ser(H).Gly.ONP=%
with
respect
Poly.Asp(OCH3).Ser(H).-
Gly to
functional
number
side
potentially the
incorporated We
nique
for
carried show
has
have
racemizable
gated.
has
chains
of polymers
report
preparing
that
little
on
or
no
residue,
example
both
but
has of
from the
Furthermore,
in which
residues
an
a polymer
studies
demonstrated.
reported
C-terminal
C-terminal
now
out
been
been
the
not use
monomer
the
optical
been of
a had purity
rigorously
the
of
and
the
on
ester
sensitive
tech-
and the
a of
investi-
“active”
HBr.H.Gly.Gly.Phe.ONP
intermediates
racemization
the
polymer
have
which
phenylalanine
group
occurred. The
readily
:::
In the stands This
precise
central
upon
problem
treating
convention for makes
the
“active”
used residue:
it possible
derivative
dicyclohexylcarbodiimide.
here
being
that
esters
here
the
Gly to
is
azlactone
with
amino
bases,
acid
= -HNCHZCO-,Ser
designate
explicitly
discussed. HOPCP
ONP is
5985
formation including
abbreviation
occurs nucleophiles.
always
=-HNCH(CH2011)CO-. and
unambiguously
= p-02NC6H40-.
pentachlorophenol.
the DCC
is
No.48
5986
The
res\Jting
azlactones
the nuclt,ophile racemiz?d. proceed
example,
through
conditior,s
which
sodium
recipe
may
good
Assay
rize
glutamic
with
to
(lb)
Phenylalanine
acid,
containing
of activity. were
have
observed
cont.
hydrochloric wiihin
tively
unstable
20-25
of peptides
peptides
acid
were
which
glycine
easy for
are
with
ac-
summaa variety
along
at about
with
100°.
conditions:
times
erratic;
read
gave
both high
parts
preparation.
in a mixture
lo- 15
gradual
and low
catalysts
of one part
of dimethylformamide The
solvent is a high and reproducible 25 [MID + 89.6 with a per reading
The use of the polyfunctional advanta,geous (7).
is neither
developed
drastic
Longer
a single the extent
estimates
carried
is
on the peptide. were
and three after
purity
of samples
more
5N HCl. -
group with
been
containing
this
We selected
reliably
error
is best
require
tube with
depending
min.
number
or serine
of phenylalanine
taken
These
We
since
and phenylalanine
large
At 100° the results
Rotations
phenylalanine:
optical
acid,
Hydrolysis
at I2Oo in a sealed
for
techniques
of
of direct
azlactone.
to establish
determination. a very
extents
through
to use a “monomer”
and of polymers
2- 3% per
a variety
the phenylalanine
to be able
hydrolytic
serine,
glutamic
acid,
important
polymerization.
aspartic
values
shown
racemic
out under
in dimethylsulfoxide :;: sensitive cases.
in other
during
HowevBr,
acid,
as base
in order
of structures.
loss
to give
to differing
as the example:
of peptides
tc about
to lead
center
our experience
hrs.
of
or extensively
has been
shown
polymerization
results
and it was
active
nor routjne.
curate
is partly
can be carried
be expected
Gly.Phe.ONP
of racerrization
aspartic
so that acylation
of Bz. Phe. ONP in turn was
reaction
p-nitrophenoxide
rs.cemized
optically
and this
and of indirect
had given
HBr.H.Gly. easily
agents,
but the product
hydrolysis
azlactone
.zation
chose
acylating
(4, 5).
The polymerization
polymer
good
is not prevented, For
Bz.Phe.OH
are
advantage rotation standard
of Beyerman
may
of
and were of this value
deviation
prove
rela-
for of 2.
No.48
5987
Where of optical
applicable
purity
of these
in the synthesis
CH3OH);
(eqs.
2-4)
Z. Gly. Gly.Phe.ONP,
corrected
as described
value
above
- 1.42
and of estimates
tally
active
from
the carboxyl
(eqs.
2,
tions .)
C-terminal
the synthesis
3).
Conversion
Z.Phe.ONP 1
group,
active
HBr.H.Gly.Phe-
:::
of 86. 5.
A high degree
esters
Although
integrity
is
even with an opti-
we have found it advisable
amino
this
of rotation
to start
group as a blocking
may be used in this sequence
of a C-terminal
the
40/c low,
errors
of optical
methods,
the p-nitrophenyl
of
Upon hydrolysis,
on combined
experimental
upon hydro-
for phenylalanine
on each.
based
of “monomer”
end using
(Other
rotation
rotation
purity.
of present
Molar as follows:
t 67O (c 2 in dichloroacetic
a molar
limits
of polymer
within reach
pure.
(all L) were
2 (c 2 in CHC13);
of two determinations
showed a phenylalanine
In
optically
All the above intermediates
showed
is within permissible
clearly
test
HBr .H. Phe. ONP t 140 (c 2 in
poly.Gly.Gly.Phe.
for 95% purity).
2 I. 5, average
polymer
a rigorous
to each of the key intermediates
sh ows that all were
129 (c 2 in CH30H);
acid,
(2)
new techniques
- 6 1 (c 2 in ethyl acetate);
lysis 89.6
may provide
at 25O and 589 rnp of the intermediates
Z.Phe.ONP,
0NP3-
hydrolysis
(8).
Application
rotations
enzymic
acid to its ester
group
of reac-
according
to
+ HBrHoAC)HBr.H.Phe.ONP -2
(C2H5)J’J (3)
Z.Gly.Gly.OH
Kovacs
et al (3) prepared
method. there
t DCC t 2
However,
was loss
this polymer
the evidence
of activity
during
value
is given for the polymer,
iate,
Z.Gly.Gly.Phe.OPCP,
ancy may have arisen nique (6N HCl, results.
+Z.Gly.Gly.Phe.ONP ?
reflux)
using
the pentachlorophenyl
cited is not adequate the polymerization and the optical
is in question
in part from is similar
purity
ester
to show whether step.
No rotation
of a key intermed-
(see below).
The discrep-
the fact that the reported
assay
tech-
to one we have found to give erratic
5988
eq.
No.&8
5,
3x1the other
mechmisms tations
hand,
of these
have
been
(4)
3 +HBrHOAc,
(5)
Z.(;ly.Asp.
gives
discussed
optically
t HONP
purity
sequence Kovacs eq.
(5).
scope
The and limi-
largely
have
However,
then it may
the occurrence
in a number
examined?’
been made
ester.
and if the solubility
favorable,
of racerniza-
specific
that certain
using
probe possible
of such reactions
We call
it has ccnne to our notice
may
racemic
that
attention
to
commerical
such steps.
et al (3) prepared 2. Gly. Gly. Phe. OPCP by a route similar 25 100 [eJ589 , m.p. 112. This sample is extensively
to
5 and report
racemized. sequence coupling CHCl,).
We have similar
which
rotation
-32 t 2O (c, e jter
(lb,
a series
difficult
to separate
from
DCU.
C,H,N
showed
points
analyses
rotations
of the resulting
1 in CHC13)
product
from
to be about to those 5).
range.
rotation
that rotation
in agreement the coupling
These
for with
observed
were
measured.
gave
that which
of Z. Gly
in other
ester
.05 In
four with no
and 25.1
and
hydrolyzed A plot
a straight
the pure
of the
line with 25 is [oJ,,~
a
we found directly.
Gly. Phe . OH t HOPCP
30-400/cD and 70-6Oo/cL.
we have
NMR
as
fractions
We examined
and the expected
phenylalanine
-vs the phenylalanine
of ester
of - 7.0, - 11. 3, -16.9
in the 120-150°
and indicated
zppears
compz.rable pheno
gave
These
s melting
0, 0 intercept
DCC
by the alternate
instead
of synthesis
correct
and the rotations ester
L- Z. Gly. Gly. Phe. OPCP
2-4 using
method
rather
having
DCU peaks. varicn
to eqs.
Kovacs’
were
samples
prepared
diisopropylcarbodiimide 25 reagent (eq. 3) and find a m.p. of 149- 150: [a] - 30 (c, 589 This sample of L-ester was not very soluble in chloroform.
our hands
The
are
demonstrated
be carefully
because
polymers
ester
product.
well
must
this problem
+ DCC----_)
is not too extensive active
pure
tion is sufficiently optical
products known
(5).
(OCH3).OH
of the optically
to isolate
racemized
and the presently
HBr.H.Gly.Gly.Phe.ONP
11 the racemization perties
partly
reactions
These systems
results
are
.with p-nitro-
+
NO.18
5989
This Research
work under
was
supported
Grant
No.
by the Air
Force
Office
of Scientific
AF-AFUSR-62-279.
(1)
(a) D. F. DeTar, W. Honsberg, U. Honsberg, A. Wieland, M. Gouge, H. Bach, A. Tahara, W. S. Brinigar, and F. F. Rogers, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Sot., & 2873 (1963). Ib) Parts I-III submitted to J. Am. Chem.zc.
(2)
F. H. Stewart, Australian J. Chem., 18, 887 (1965); R. D. B. Fraser, B. S. Harrap, T. P. MacRae, F. H. Stewart, and E. Suzuki, J. Mol. Biol., 12, 482 (1965). J. Kovacs, R. 2282 (1966).
(4)
M.
(5)
D. F. Chem.
DeTar, Sot.,
(6)
D. F.
DeTar, Rogers,
(7)
H. C. Beyerman and W. M. Van den Brink, Proc. Chem. Sot. 266 (1963). H. C. Beyerman and W. M. Van den Brink, and F. Weygand, A. Prox, W. Kt)nig, L. Schmidhammer. and E. Nintz, Rec. trav. chim. s, 213 (1965).
(8)
K. Hofmann. M. E. J. Am. Chem. Sot.,
F. F.
and L. R.
g,
and A.
Levine,
Silverstein, 1024 (1966).
J.
Kapoor,
Am. and F.
J.
Chem. F.
H. Bach, and F. F. Rogers, Jr. Ph.D. thesis, Florida
Woolner, G. Splihler, 8&l, 1486 (1958).
Am.
Chem.
Sm.,
86,
Rogers,
Jr., State
and E.
Jr.,
SIX.,
88, -
(3)
Goodman
Giannotti,
C.
2918 (1964). J.
Am.
in preparation. University, 1964.
T.
Schwartz,