Analysis, modelling and control of complex manufacturing systems

ANALYSIS,

AND CONTROLOF COMPLEXMANUFACTURING SYSTEMS

MODELLING

LIPPOLD 1)

G. VOIGT, J.

An universal system of’ canputer-aided design, caputer-aided-manufacturing, canputer-aided planning, canputer-aided control and canputer aided-accounting of a flexible fabrication is introduced. The planning and Control are carried out by aid of man-canputer-dialogue and simulation. Keywords: Flexible manufacturing, canputer-aided design, caputer-aided manufacturing, canputer-aided planning, canputer-aided control, mancanputer-dialogue, simulation. Complex cial,

manufacturing

economical

bility sal

of

[21.

realized

by us is

original

system

tured

of

systems.

The structure 151.

demand for

univer-

and partially of

st’ructured

and/or

flexi-

up of

and function

The system

as a multi-goal-multi-level-system

so-

and accounting

designed

by a hierarchically

mpdels[4],

large-scale

the building

course

roughly

1.

of

The increasing

preparation,

reflected

discrete

examples

require

Such a system

shown in fig.

are

typical

fabrication

computer-aided

manufacturing

discontinuous

arc

and technical

and effectivity systems

of

systems

of

lhe

system

models

is

of

st.ruc-

as a multi-lsyer-sys-

tern [3J. By designing

actions

the

and decisions

tions

of

tegy.

The

is the

solved).

fuzzy

In in

out fuzzy

about

situation

indicator.

of

variants

rial, the

the

Prof.

Dr.

by

forecasted

dialogue).

advices

is

means are

of

the

demand

a fuzzy

Voigt,

For

at

asked

these

to be

connected

sec-

hy

operator

The

Joachim

Lippold

of

the

nn

at

by

sliding

con-

collecting, schedulinq

ie

worked of

position

each

is

theoretical

there

costs

ask

computer

foundations

the

of

to

advices

step

each

in--

called

able

by

by

years

time

is

fuzzy

by

hy

on n set

also

Based

including

found

based

of

step

demand

comput.er

are

is

set

five

t,he

with

information ore

program.

Mittweida

fuzzy

on the problem

decisions

instance

of

stra-

responsibly

operator-guided

are

process.

processing

costs, Dr.

of

The

forecasted of

and/or

and calculated

extending

the opern-

couplings,

depends

developed

experience.

human

following

and decide

decisions The

available

manufacturing Gerhard

set,

with

the

by fuzzy

The

the

the

University of Engineer’ing 9250 Mi ttwefda G5)R

294

The

that

man-computer-dialogue-Rystcms.

questions

dialogue).

computer.

programs

programs

forecasted

answers

by a learning of

act

sections

made of

with

(this

algorithmic

the

and calculating

facturing

1)

set

manufacturing

get

by

part

the

system

Furthermore

automatically

Biderations

the

programs

the

information,

developed

of

situation.

given

(operator-guided

@toring

of

the

realized

made possible

operator part

to be connected is

in computer-guided

programs

formation

additional

of

on the principle

and by using

aid

which.the

advices

is

worked

(computer-guided

fuzzy

This

instructions

manner with

relied

This

levels

and

boundaries.

The dialogue

tions

network.

elements

and fuzzy

we mainly

are effectively

a computer

in given goals

pf

system

of

working of

the

out

mate-

place,

circulating

a

manu-

Pnpamtian

I

of

Pmductlon,

I

Sliding Scheduling

Special Tasks and Programs

i

Data -Base

--_-*

Scheduling manutacturing

/

1. layer

I

Dota Base CAM ---__ t

Annual manufacturing 2 . layer

s-m--

$-q!Jq~i

3. layer

CAD

o,

Fabrication / Storage

I

I CAD CAM

Computer-aided Computer-aided

Fig.

1 1 rjenernl

design manufacturbng system

co~~ntinr]

of

of

computer-aided

The

stoch

,111d forecasted

gain.

stocA

probably

available.

Sets

nf

not

being

mnnlrfacturing

rlr:m;~nds

are

or

forecasted

out

in

demands

Capacities

programs

worked

possible

preparation,

course

and

ac-

macluFncturing

and

the

are

to

establish

balanced

equalized

equalization

man-computer-dialogue

appropriate

are of hecause

algorithms

for

with

with

demanda.

capacities

in

the

with

general

each

it

is

necessary

decision. In

the

llniversal

counting

of

makinq

up

ndvices

manufacturing

tn

date

given.

rl111i ng . This extending (time to with

n+5.

the The

growing

technological

and

This five

of

there

is

for In

precision knowledge parameters

run) of

is

used

schedules,

in

each

there the

about and

a principle t,o

are

rises

same

by

step of

by

plans step about

principle

for from

and

sliding

a manufacturing scheduling

scheprogram

point the n+5 used

r

years to

technical is

ac-

step

principle

out

requests, The

of

and

instructions

the

step

course

programs, 2 for

n at

worked

customerS on.

the

figure year

plans so

preparation,

af

instance

shown

years.

computer

computer-aided

precizing

leads

principle

over

of

system

n+l n+l

and by

annual.

295

r

pknnkro pcrld

L

I

,+

.

.

I.

n+2

n +1

n

n43

t

I

n+5

n+C

w

r scheduling paint, time of computer run Fig.

2 Principle

of

manufacturing blocks

by

scheduling

the

deterministic

regarded

tion

plans monthly

for

monthly

times

process

control

is

is

decision

the

the

the

concerted

use

are

based the

and

action

of

highly

used.

time

a lot

of

of

and

specialized

as

so

on.

The

making by

The

and

problem systems

methods

of

mathematics,

second

any

simulation.

main

development in

and

manufactu-

manufacturirlg

findings

is

con-

i4anufacturing

forecasted

be made.

The

manu-

fahrica-

chnrges

Before

technology,

methods

annual

consideration

the

fixed.

complex

year capa-

manufacturing of

is

and

deterministic

supervision.

different

such

into

models.

shall

controlling

In

In one

blocks

Here

and

system

statement

a year.

Fly the

or

Demands

building

finishing

stochastic the

years

taking

forecasted

of

disciplines

of nut

and

of

cybernetics

of

over

building

process.

used.

capacities.

on real

aid

behavior

scientific

also

beginning

following

mation-processing, the

charge

modelling

different

and

per

hy

all

and

fabrication

five

are

worked

are

the

probable

As a result

are

values for

over

scheduling

demands

of

manufacturing

values

distributed

of

controled

the

extending

monthly

periods

performed

pn analysis, is

and

expectation

treating

ring

as even

deadlines

of

expectation

fluctuations

and the

the

and

scheduling

control

programs

scheduling

the

trol

time

models

are

models

by monthly

real

manufacturing

facturing

scheduling

scheduling,

and

cities

sliding

infor-

OF new methods order

interest.

References H.-D.;

Klabuhn, Schnittpunkt msr,

z

Matern, von

(1984)

Lauenroth, Analyse

U.O.;

Systems, Q.T

Macko,

G.:

Voigt,

Craaer,

S.:

Berlin,

Inhalt,

Arhei

t.stdtigkei

V.D.;

technologischer

Berlin

(1983)

1

Prinzipien

msr,

26

Takahara, London

im t,

Steuerung, in

und

(1983)

Y.:

Theory

?lethoden

of

Hierarchical

Fertigungeprozeese,

Grundlagsn

und Anwendungen,

Vorbereltung Prozesse

hei

der

Analyse,

im Geratebau,

der

10,ll

1970

Diekontinuierliche

Entwicklungstendenzen

Steuerung “2

k4.:

New York,

Modolliewng,

Alradmale-Verlag

296

Weber,

Mesarovic,

halyme,

und

Innovationsprozessen,

Multilevel voigt,

hlensch-Uaschine-Kommunikat,ion

11

H.-G.; von

M.:

Automatisierung

Planung

und

Feiogerltetecnnik,