International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 652–666
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhmt
Analytical solutions for three-dimensional steady and transient heat conduction problems of a double-layer plate with a local heat source Hao-Jie Jiang, Hong-Liang Dai ⇑ State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China Department of Engineering Mechanics, College of Mechanical & Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history: Received 30 January 2014 Received in revised form 4 May 2015 Accepted 24 May 2015
Keywords: Analytical solution Three-dimensional temperature field Double-layer plate Local heat source Steady heat conduction Transient heat conduction
a b s t r a c t In this paper, analytical solutions for three-dimensional steady and transient heat conduction problems of a double-layer plate with a local heat source are presented, the double-layer structure includes a coating layer and FGM layer. The Poisson method and layer wise (LW) approach are applied to solve the three-dimensional steady heat conduction problem. Meanwhile, to solve the three-dimensional transient heat conduction problem of the double-layer plate, the method of separation of variables (SOV) and LW approach are together applied. The aim of this research is to understand the influences of selected coating material, local heat source and structural parameters on temperature distribution of the double-layer plate, and to guide engineers designing the double-layer structures in thermal environment. Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction Double-layer structures are widely used in aerospace, nuclear reactors, internal combustion engines and other fields, and these structures often lie in thermal environment. Therefore, it is very important to investigate the three-dimensional heat conduction problem for the double-layer (Coating/FGM) plate. For the temperature-related problems of FGM structures, Ding et al. [1] gave a solution of dynamic thermoelastic problem for cylindrical shells. Sadowski et al. [2] carried on theoretical prediction and experimental verification of temperature distributions for FGM cylindrical plates which subjected to thermal shock. Skoczen´ [3] obtained FGM structural members via low temperature strain. Without considering energy dissipation, Mallik and Kanoria [4] dealt with the problem of thermoelastic interactions in a FGM structure due to the presence of periodically varying heat sources. By using Green’s function technique [5,6], the heat source and heat flux for FGM structures were determined. Utilizing the principle of virtual displacements, Brischetto et al. [7] analyzed a simply supported FGM rectangular plate subjected to thermo-mechanical loadings. Using the homogenization method, Shabana and Noda [8] carried on numerical evaluation of the thermomechanical ⇑ Corresponding author at: Department of Engineering Mechanics, College of Mechanical & Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China. Tel.: +86 731 88664011; fax: +86 731 88711911. E-mail address:
[email protected] (H.-L. Dai). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.05.094 0017-9310/Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
effective properties for FGM. Shen et al. [9–14] studied a series of mechanical behaviors for FGM structures in thermal environment. Feng and Jin [15] investigated the fracture behavior of FGM plate containing parallel surface cracks which subjected to a thermal shock. Based on the three-dimensional linear theory of elasticity, Li et al. [16] presented free vibration analysis of FGM rectangular plates with simply supported and clamped edges in thermal environment. Using the higher-order shear deformation plate theory, Sun and Luo [17] studied the wave propagation of an infinite FGM plate in thermal environment. By using the infinitesimal theory of magnetothermoelasticity, Dai et al. [18–20] studied thermomechanical behaviors of FGM cylindrical and spherical structures. Applying the finite difference method, Hein et al. [21] analyzed the heat conduction problem with spatially varying parameters. Assuming material properties were temperature dependent and graded in the radial direction, Malekzadeh et al. [22] presented a three-dimensional free vibration analysis of the FGM truncated conical shells placed in thermal environment. Due to nonuniform heat supply, Ootao and Ishihara [23] gave a three-dimensional solution for transient thermoelastic problem of a functionally graded rectangular plate with piecewise exponential law. For effects of coating on resistance of high temperature, Limarga et al. [24] studied high-temperature vibration damping behavior of thermal barrier coating materials. Based on theory and experiment, the tribological properties and wear behaviors [25–33] of variety of coating layers from room temperature to high temperature had been investigated. Based on infrared pyrometry combing with
H.-J. Jiang, H.-L. Dai / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 652–666
653
Nomenclature x, y, z a, b h, H y0 yd t i, j, k k1 , k2 , k3
Cartesian coordinates [m] plate dimension in x and y direction [m] thickness of coating layer and FGM layer [m] location of laser point in y direction [m] width of local heat source strip [m] time [s] number of half wave in x, y and z direction thermal conductivity coefficient in x, y and z direction [W/m K] F k3 heat conduction coefficients of the FGM layer at z direction [W/m K] 0 0 kim , kic , ði ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ heat conduction coefficients of metal and ceramic materials at three different directions [W/m K] T, T 0 , DT temperature, room temperature and temperature increment [K]
specific robot spray trajectories, Xia et al. [34] detected and recorded temperature evolution continuously during preheating, spraying and cooling stages. Hodhod et al. [35] determined the effect of different coating types with different thicknesses on the residual load capacities of reinforced concrete loaded column models. Using thermal spray coatings, Matthews et al. [36,37] gave the roles of microstructure in the high temperature oxidation mechanism of Cr3C2ANiCr composite coatings. Nguyen et al. [38] studied the influence of cerium oxide argon-annealed coating on the alloy oxidation behavior at 1100 °C. Hernández Rossette et al. [39] investigated the unsteady aerodynamic and aero-thermal performance of a first stage gas turbine bucket with thermal barrier coating and internal cooling configuration. By means of several material characterizations before and after annealing processes, Antonaia et al. [40] discussed the stability of WAAl2O3 coating at high temperature. For evaluating the thermal shielding efficiency of intumescent coating, Han et al. [41] deposited a cone calorimeter as heater source which coupled with a thermocouple as detector of the temperature for steel plates. Ohtsu et al. [42] investigated the effect of the heating temperature on the characteristics of the surface layer in a simple treatment process using calcium-hydroxide slurry. Zhang et al. [43] developed a computational model to predict the temperature profile over an organic coating on a metal surface. Applying with detonation-gun spray technology, Kaur et al. [44] studied Cr3C2ANiCr coating on T22 boiler steel subjected to high-temperature oxidation and oxidation-erosion environment. Yu et al. [45] showed that the gas temperature could improve the coating deposition efficiency. By a potentially simple, scalable, non-vacuum technique, Srivastava et al. [46] analyzed high temperature oxidation and corrosion behavior of Ni/NiACoAAl composite coatings. Abyzov et al. [47] developed a composite material from particles of diamond in a copper matrix of good thermal and mechanical properties. Arizmendi-Morquecho et al. [48] analyzed the high temperature behavior of recycled fly ash cenospheres which deposited thermal barrier coatings. Barshilia et al. [49] found that the multi-functional ZnO coating was reliable for high temperature photothermal conversion applications. Selvakumar and Barshilia [50] presented the state-of-the-art of the physical vapor deposited solar selective coatings. By means of scanning electron microscope [51,52], the surface topography of composite coatings were observed and analyzed. Freni et al. [53] presented novel experimental methods for verification of both hydrothermal and mechanical stabilities of adsorbent coatings. Aydin [54] gave combined effects of thermal barrier coating and blended with diesel fuel on usability of vegetable oils in diesel engines. In short, coatings of structure play great roles in improving the heat resistance.
DT c , DT F temperature increment for coating layer and FGM layer [K] DT b temperature increment at adhesive position [K] c, q specific heat [J/kg K] and density of the double-layer plate [kg/m3] cm , cc specific heat of metal and ceramic materials for FGM layer [J/kg K] qm , qc density of metal and ceramic materials for FGM layer [kg/m3] F0 heat flow absorbed by the coating layer [J] 0 00 000 f , f , f heat flux density [J/m2] f heat generation [J/m2] l, n, N arbitrary discrete layer, functionally graded index and the total number of discrete layer
On the other hand, a few researchers have reported the problems of temperature field. Barik et al. [55] studied stationary plane contact of a heat conducting FGM punch and a rigid insulated half-space. Using Legendre polynomials and Euler differential equations system, Karampour [56] obtained steady temperature distribution for the Poro-FGM spherical vessel. Based on a graded element model, Cao et al. [57] obtained fundamental solution for steady-state heat transfer in FGM. By the methods of Laplace transform and inverse Laplace theorem, Zhou et al. [58] gave exact solutions of the temperature distribution for both the FGM strip and the well stirred fluid. Based on the elasticity theory, Malekzadeh et al. [59] presented the transient analysis of rotating multi-layered FGM cylindrical shells in thermal environment. Applying with Hermitian transfinite element method, Shariyat et al. [60–62] obtained temperature-dependent behaviors for FGM structures under thermal loads. Based on the Lord-Shulman theory, Zhou et al. [63] studied the transient thermoelastic response of FGM rectangular plates. By the methods of Laplace and finite cosine transformations, Ootao and Tanigawa [64–67] studied the three-dimensional transient thermal problems exactly. Using the modified Durbin’s numerical inversion method, Keles and Conker [68] solved transient hyperbolic heat conduction in thick-walled FGM cylinders and spheres analytically. By experimental and mixed finite element methods, Aksoylar et al. [69] gave a nonlinear transient analysis for FGM cylinder under blast loads. Jiang and Dai [70] carried out a three-dimensional thermodynamic analysis of simply supported high strength and low alloy rectangular steel plates under laser shock processing. However, as far as we know, analytical solutions of three-dimensional steady and transient heat conduction problem for a double-layer (coating/FGM) plate with local heat source has not been found in literatures. The aim of this study is to give analytical solutions of three-dimensional steady and transient heat conduction problems for a double-layer (coating/FGM) plate with local heat source. In this study, the Poisson method, LW approach and SOV method are used to solve the three-dimensional temperature field, which could guide engineers designing the double-layer structure adapt to high-temperature environment.
2. Basic formulations of the problem Consider a double-layer plate with local heat source under a three-dimensional temperature field (as shown in Fig. 1). The Cartesian coordinate system oxyz is set on the top surface ðz ¼ 0Þ of the double-layer plate, here a, b, h and H in Fig. 1 represent the double-layer structure’s length, width, thicknesses of material
654
H.-J. Jiang, H.-L. Dai / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 652–666
Fig. 1. Geometrical configuration of a double-layer (coating/FGM) plate with local heat source.
I and thicknesses of the total structure, respectively. In addition, y0 is the location of local heat source, yd the width of local heat source. Material I and material II represent, respectively, the coating material and FGM for the double-layer structure. 2.1. Steady heat conduction analysis The three-dimensional steady heat conduction equation of the double-layer plate in this model can be written as
k1 ðzÞ
@ 2 DTðx; y; zÞ @ 2 DTðx; y; zÞ @ 2 DTðx; y; zÞ þ k2 ðzÞ þ k3 ðzÞ 2 2 @x @y @z2
¼ f ðx; y; zÞ
0
f ðx; y; zÞ ¼ f ðx; yÞdðzÞ
ð2Þ
where dðzÞ is the Dirac delta function, and the uniform heat flux 0 distribution f ðx; yÞ is selected as the form of rectangular constant energy density
f ðx; yÞ ¼
F 0 =4ayd
at z ¼ 0;
0
others
y0 6 y 6 y0 þ yd
ð3Þ
where F 0 is the local heat flow absorbed by the coating layer. The temperature increment function of the total structure DTðx; y; zÞ can be expressed as
DTðx; y; zÞ ¼
dDT c ðx; y; zÞ F dDT F ðx; y; zÞ ¼ k 3 dz dz z¼h z¼h
DT c ðx; y; zÞ ð0 6 z 6 hÞ DT c ðx; y; zÞ ðh < z 6 HÞ
ð4Þ
ð6bÞ
where DT b ðx; yÞ is the temperature increment at adhesive position, F
k3 and k3 are the heat conduction coefficients of the coating layer and FGM layer at z direction, respectively. The solution scheme diagram for inhomogeneous equation (1) accompany with above-mentioned temperature boundary conditions can be seen in Fig. 2. For the coating layer, assuming the temperature increments are 0 at all six faces firstly (see Fig. 2(a)). Then the first part of the temperature increment function DT 1c ðx; y; zÞ yields
ð1Þ
where k1 ðzÞ, k2 ðzÞ and k3 ðzÞ denote, respectively, the heat conduction coefficients along x, y and z directions. For the coating layer, the corresponding k1 ðzÞ, k2 ðzÞ and k3 ðzÞ are constants. For the FGM layer, three heat conduction coefficients k1 ðzÞ, k2 ðzÞ and k3 ðzÞ vary along the z direction. DTðx; y; zÞ is the corresponding temperature increment function relative to room temperature T 0 , i.e. DT ¼ T T 0 , and the heat source term f ðx; y; zÞ in Eq. (1) is defined as [70]
0
k3
DT 1c ðx; y; zÞ ¼
1 X 1 X 1 X ipx jp y kpz Eijk sin sin sin a b h i¼1 j¼1 k¼1
ð7Þ
Substituting Eq. (7)into Eq. (1), utilizing the orthogonal behavior of the trigonometric function, it can be obtained that
Eijk ¼
2 a2 byd hkijk
Z
a
0
Z
b
0
Z
h
F 0 sin 0
ipx jp y kpz dx dy dz sin sin a b h
ð8Þ
where
kijk
" 2 2 # 2 i j k ¼ k1 þ k2 þ k3 p2 a b h
ð9Þ
and
Z
a
sin
ipx a dx ¼ ½ð1Þiþ1 þ 1 a ip
sin
jp y dy ¼ b
0
Z
b
0
Z
h
sin
sin
y0
¼ Z
y0 þyd
ð10aÞ
jpy dy b
b jpðy0 þ yd Þ jpy0 cos cos jp b b
kpz h dz ¼ ½ð1Þkþ1 þ 1 h kp
ð10bÞ
ð10cÞ
where the subscript c and F here represent the abbreviation of coating layer and FGM layer, respectively. Similar with Ref. [70], the values of temperature increment on the boundaries of the double-layer plate can be written as follows
Through above integral, then the first part of the temperature increment function for the coating layer DT 1c ðx; y; zÞ is obtained
DTð0; y; zÞ ¼ DTða; y; zÞ ¼ 0
DT 1c ðx; y; zÞ ¼
ð5aÞ
1 X 1 X 1 X i¼1 j¼1 k¼1
DTðx; 0; zÞ ¼ DTðx; b; zÞ ¼ 0
ð5bÞ
DTðx; y; HÞ ¼ 0
ð5cÞ
All faces are insulated except the local heat source zone, i.e. at surface z ¼ 0. The following two temperature-dependent equations for adhesive position that between the coating layer and FGM layer should be considered
DT c ðx; y; hÞ ¼ DT F ðx; y; hÞ ¼ DT b ðx; yÞ
0
ð6aÞ
8F 0 ijkabyd p3 kijk
jpy0 jpðy0 þ yd Þ ipx jpy kpz sin cos þ cos sin sin b a b h b ð11Þ From Fig. 2(b), the heat conduction equation of the second part for the coating layer can be written as
k1
@ 2 DT 2c ðx; y; zÞ @ 2 DT 2c ðx; y; zÞ @ 2 DT 2c ðx; y; zÞ þ k þ k ¼0 2 3 @x2 @y2 @z2
ð12Þ
655
H.-J. Jiang, H.-L. Dai / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 652–666
Fig. 2. General decomposition of the Poisson problem on rectangular domain (a) Zero boundary value Poisson problem; (b) General Dirichlet problem.
where DT 2c ðx; y; zÞ is the temperature increment function of the second part for the coating layer. The corresponding boundary temperature except the local heat source zone are expressed as
According to the above decomposition of the Poisson problem, the whole temperature increment function for the coating layer DT c ðx; y; zÞ can be obtained as
DT 2c ð0; y; zÞ ¼ DT 2c ða; y; zÞ ¼ 0
ð13aÞ
DT 2c ðx; 0; zÞ ¼ DT 2c ðx; b; zÞ ¼ 0
ð13bÞ
DT c ðx; y; zÞ ¼ DT 1c ðx; y; zÞ þ DT 2c ðx; y; zÞ 1 X 1 X 1 X 8F 0 jpy0 jpðy0 þ yd Þ ¼ cos þ cos b abyd ijkp3 kijk b i¼1 j¼1 k¼1
DT 2c ðx; y; hÞ ¼ DT b ðx; yÞ
ð13cÞ
DT 2c ðx; y; 0Þ ¼ 0
1 X 1 X ipx jp y g 1 ðzÞ sin sin a b i¼1 j¼1
g 1 ðzÞ ¼ T s esz
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi u 2 uk ip þ k jp 2 t 1 a 2 b ¼ k3
ð21Þ
ð15Þ
k1 ðzÞ
ð16Þ
Thus, the unknown function g 1 ðzÞ can also be expressed as
g 1 ðzÞ ¼ C 1 coshðs1 zÞ þ C 2 sinhðs1 zÞ
1 X 1 X
ipx jpy ½C 1 coshðs1 zÞ þ C 2 sinhðs1 zÞ sin sin a b j¼1 ð18Þ
Considering Eq. (13d), it can be easily obtained that C 1 ¼ 0, yields
DT 2c ðx; y; zÞ ¼
1 X 1 X ipx jpy C 2 sinhðs1 zÞ sin sin a b i¼1 j¼1
C2 ¼
4
Ra Rb 0
0
DT b sin ipax sin jpby dx dy ab sinhðs1 hÞ
l
heat conduction coefficients of arbitrary layer ki ði ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ can be
l
ki ðzÞ ¼
n h 0 0 0 þ z=ðH hÞ ðkim kic Þ þ kic ; hH
i ¼ ð1; 2; 3Þ
ð23Þ
where
z¼
Nh H H h þ l; N1 N1
ðl ¼ 1; 2; . . . NÞ
ð24Þ 0
0
where n is the functionally graded index, kim and kic represent the heat conduction coefficients of bottom layer and top layer (metal and ceramic are selected in this paper) along three different directions, respectively. N is the total number of discrete layer, l the arbitrary discrete layer. Then the heat conduction equation of arbitrary layer can be written as
ð19Þ l
k1 ðzÞ
And based on Eq. (13c), unknown constant C 2 can be determined
@ 2 DT F ðx;y; zÞ @ 2 DT F ðx; y; zÞ @ 2 DT F ðx; y;zÞ 000 þ k2 ðzÞ þ k3 ðzÞ ¼ f ðx;y; zÞ @x2 @y2 @z2 ð22Þ
The LW method is applied as the heat conduction coefficients of the FGM layer k1 ðzÞ, k2 ðzÞ and k3 ðzÞ vary along the z coordinate, which cannot be expanded in the Fourier series form. The discrete
ð17Þ
The temperature increment function of the second part DT 2c ðx; y; zÞ can be written as
i¼1
ipx jp y sin sinhðs1 zÞ a b
For the FGM layer, the three-dimensional steady heat conduction equation is
where T s is a constant, and substituting Eqs. (14) and (15) into Eq. (12), yields
DT 2c ðx; y; zÞ ¼
sin
ð14Þ
where
s1;2
1 X 1 ipx jpy k pz X 16DT b sin sin þ a b h ijp2 sinhðs1 hÞ i¼1 j¼1
ð13dÞ
It can be easily obtained that the temperature increment function DT 2c ðx; y; zÞ which satisfies the Eqs. (13a–d) is of the form [7]
DT 2c ðx; y; zÞ ¼
sin
@ 2 DT lF ðx;y; zÞ @ 2 DT lF ðx;y;zÞ @ 2 DT lF ðx;y; zÞ l l 000 þ k2 ðzÞ þ k3 ðzÞ ¼ f ðx; y;zÞ @x2 @y2 @z2 ð25Þ
The arbitrary layer’s boundary values of the temperature incre-
ð20Þ
ment function DT lF ðx; y; zÞ for the FGM layer are
656
H.-J. Jiang, H.-L. Dai / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 652–666
DT lF ð0; y; zÞ ¼ DT lF ða; y; zÞ ¼ 0
ð26aÞ
DT lF ðx; 0; zÞ ¼ DT lF ðx; b; zÞ ¼ 0
ð26bÞ
DT 0F ðx; y; hÞ
ð26cÞ
Thus, the second part of the arbitrary layer’s temperature increment function for the FGM layer DT l2F ðx; y; zÞ can be obtained as
DT l2F ðx; y; zÞ ¼
¼ DT b ðx; yÞ
1 X 1 X
½C l1 coshðsl zÞ þ C l2 sinhðsl zÞ sin
i¼1 j¼1
ipx jpy sin a b ð34Þ
DT NF ðx; y; HÞ ¼ 0
ð26dÞ
where DT 0F ðx; y; hÞ is the top temperature increment function of the FGM layer that bonded to the coating layer, and DT NF ðx; y; HÞ the bottom temperature increment of FGM (i.e. Nth discrete FGM layer). As the normal heat density of the coating layer equals to FGM layer on the bonding position, the continuous condition for the normal heat density can be written as
0 dT c ðx; y; zÞ 0 dT F ðx; y; zÞ k3 ¼ k3 dz dz z¼h
ð27Þ
where
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi u
2 u l ip 2 l uk1 a þ k2 jbp sl ¼ t l k3
ð35Þ
The second part of the arbitrary discrete layer’s temperature boundary condition for the FGM layer can be written as
DT l2F ðx; y; zÞ ¼ DT b ðx; yÞ sin
z¼h
And with two continuity boundary conditions for arbitrary discrete FGM layer [23]
DT Fb ðx; y; zl Þ ¼ DT Ft ðx; y; zlþ1 Þ l
k3b
ð28aÞ
@ DT Fb ðx; y; zl Þ lþ1 @ DT Ft ðx; y; zlþ1 Þ ¼ k3t @z @z
ð28bÞ
where DT Fb ðx; y; zl Þ is the temperature increment for bottom of lth FGM layer, DT Ft ðx; y; zl Þ the temperature increment for top surl
000
00
f ðx; y; zÞ ¼ f ðx; yÞsin
ðz HÞp 2ðh HÞ
where 00
f ðx; yÞ ¼
1 X 1 X 16DT b i¼1 j¼1
sin
abijp
"
2
k1
ð29Þ
# 2 2 ip jp k2 þ k 3 s2 a b
ipx jp y sin a b
The first part of the temperature increment function for arbitrary discrete layer DT l1F ðx; y; zÞ which satisfies the temperature boundary conditions can be assumed as
DT l1F ðx; y; zÞ
1 X 1 X 1 X ipx jp y ¼ Elijk sin sin a b i¼1 j¼1 k¼1
sin
ðN 1Þðz hÞkp Hh
ð31Þ
Utilizing the orthogonal behavior of the trigonometric function, the coefficient
Elijk
Elijk
2.2. Transient heat conduction analysis The three-dimensional transient heat conduction equation for the double-layer structure can be written as
cðzÞqðzÞ
@ DT @ 2 DT @ 2 DT @ 2 DT k1 ðzÞ k2 ðzÞ k3 ðzÞ 2 2 @t @x @y @z2
¼ f ðx; y; z; tÞ
# 2 2 32DT b ip jp 2 ¼ k2 þ k3 s k1 abijp2 ðH hÞ a b
DTðx; 0; z; tÞ ¼ DTðx; b; z; tÞ ¼ 0
ð39bÞ
DTðx; y; H; tÞ ¼ 0
ð39cÞ
The temperature-dependent boundary conditions of adhesive position between the coating layer and FGM layer are
DT c ðx; y; h; tÞ ¼ DT F ðx; y; h; tÞ ¼ DT b ðx; y; tÞ dDT c ðx; y; z; tÞ dz
l l 2 2 @ 2 DT lF ðx; y; zÞ l @ DT F ðx; y; zÞ l @ DT F ðx; y; zÞ þ k2 þ k3 ¼0 2 2 @x @y @z2
ð33Þ
ð40aÞ
F dDT F ðx; y; z; tÞ
¼ k3
dz
z¼h
The second part of heat conduction equation (see Fig. 2(b)) for the FGM layer can be written as
ð38Þ
ð39aÞ
ð40bÞ z¼h
For the coating layer, the temperature increment function DT c ðx; y; z; tÞ can be expanded as
DT c ðx; y; z; tÞ ¼
1 X 1 X 1 X
Hijk ðtÞX i ðxÞY j ðyÞZ k ðzÞ
ð41Þ
i¼1 j¼1 k¼1
ð32Þ
l
DT c ðx; y; z; tÞ ð0 6 z 6 hÞ DT F ðx; y; z; tÞ ðh < z 6 HÞ
DTð0; y; z; tÞ ¼ DTða; y; z; tÞ ¼ 0
k3
4kðN 1ÞðH hÞ ðN1Þk 2 h i2 ð1Þ 2 l ip 2 l jp l ðN1Þkp 2 ½4k ðN 1Þ 1p k1 a k2 b k3 Hh
k1
The temperature boundary conditions of the double-layer plate can be written as follows
can be obtained as
"
ð37Þ
where cðzÞ and qðzÞ denote, respectively, the specific heat and density of the whole double-layer structure. cðzÞ and qðzÞ are constants for the coating layer. For the FGM layer, cðzÞ and qðzÞ vary along the z coordinate, the heat source term expression f ðx; y; z; tÞ is similar as Eq. (3), other symbols represent the same meaning as the steady heat conduction analysis. The temperature increment function of the double-layer plate DTðx; y; z; tÞ can be expressed as
DTðx; y; z; tÞ ¼ ð30Þ
ð36Þ
Substituting Eq. (34) into Eq. (36), the coefficients C l1 and C l2 can be obtained (see in Appendix A).
l
face of ðl þ 1Þth FGM layer, k3b and k3t the heat conduction coefficients on z direction for bottom of lth FGM layer and top surface of ðl þ 1Þth FGM layer, respectively. Applying with the same decomposition principle like the coating layer, similarly, considering the first part of the solution (see Fig. 2(a)), the expression 000 f ðx; y; zÞ on Eq. (25) can be expressed as
ðzl HÞp 2ðh HÞ
where X i ðxÞ, Y j ðyÞ and Z k ðzÞ are trigonometric eigenfunctions which are expressed as
X i ðxÞ ¼ sin
ipx a
ð42aÞ
657
H.-J. Jiang, H.-L. Dai / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 652–666
Y j ðyÞ ¼ sin Z k ðzÞ ¼ sin
jp y b
ð42bÞ
ð4k þ 1Þpz 2h
ð42cÞ
1 X 1 X
DT F ðx; y; z; tÞ ¼
WðtÞX i ðxÞY j ðyÞZ 1 ðzÞ
i¼1 j¼1
þ
1 X 1 X
HðtÞX i ðxÞY j ðyÞZ 2 ðzÞ
ð53Þ
i¼1 j¼1
And the inhomogeneous term f ðx; y; z; tÞ can be expanded in the form of eigenfunction [70,71] 1 X 1 X 1 X
where the meaning of X i ðxÞ and Y j ðyÞ are the same as Eqs. (42a) and (42b), the expression of Z 1 ðzÞ and Z 2 ðzÞ are
ð43Þ
Z 1 ðzÞ ¼ sin
ðz HÞp hH
ð54aÞ
Utilizing the orthogonal behavior of the trigonometric eigenfunction, /ijk ðtÞ can be easily obtained as
Z 2 ðzÞ ¼ sin
ðz HÞp 2ðh HÞ
ð54bÞ
f ðx; y; z; tÞ ¼
/ijk ðtÞX i ðxÞY j ðyÞZ k ðzÞ
i¼1 j¼1 k¼1
8 abh
/ijk ðtÞ ¼
Z
a
0
Z
b
Z
0
h
f ðx; y; z; tÞX i ðxÞY j ðyÞZ k ðzÞdx dy dz
ð44Þ
0
Substituting Eq. (44) into Eq. (43), and considering Eqs. (37) and (41), yields
dHijk ðtÞ þ xijk Hijk ðtÞ ¼ Xijk ðtÞ dt
dWðtÞ dHðtÞ þ x0ij ðzÞWðtÞ þ ½Z 2 ðzÞ=Z 1 ðzÞ þ x00ij ðzÞHðtÞ dt dt ¼ A1 B½Z 2 ðzÞ=Z 1 ðzÞ
ð45Þ
where
64F 0 ; ayd hijp2 cq
00 ij ðzÞ
x
xijk ¼ vijk =cc qc ; Xijk ðtÞ ¼ /ijk ðtÞ=cc qc
ð55Þ
where
A1 ¼
2 2 2 ! ip jp ð4k þ 1Þp k1 þ k2 þ k3 a b 2h
vijk ¼
Substituting Eqs. (53) and (54a,b) into Eq. (50), yields
B ¼ cos
jpðy0 þ yd Þ jpy0 cos b b
ð56aÞ
2 2 !, ip jp p 2 cðzÞqðzÞ k1 ðzÞ þ k2 ðzÞ þ k3 ðzÞ a b ðh HÞ
¼
ð46Þ
X i ðxÞ, Y j ðyÞ and Z k ðzÞ are not zero for arbitrary values of x, y and z, and with the initial boundary condition DT c ðx; y; z; 0Þ ¼ 0, yields
Hijk ð0Þ ¼ 0
ð47Þ
ð56bÞ 2 2 ip jp p þ k2 ðzÞ þ k3 ðzÞ a b 2ðh HÞ
x00ij ðzÞ ¼ k1 ðzÞ
2 !, cðzÞqðzÞ ð56cÞ
According to Eqs. (45) and (47), yields
Hijk ðtÞ ¼
Z
t
Xijk ðsÞexijk ðtsÞ ds
ð48Þ
0
Substituting Eq. (48) into Eq. (41), the coating layer’s temperature increment function DT c ðx; y; z; tÞ can be expressed as n
ð4kþ1Þp2 . o 2 jp 2 k1 ðiapÞ þk2 ð b Þ þk3 cc qc ðtsÞ 64F 0 2h e ds ayd hijp2 cq i¼1 j¼1 k¼1 0 jpðy0 þ yd Þ jpy0 ipx jpy ð4k þ 1Þpz cos cos sin sin ð49Þ sin b b a b 2h
DT c ðx; y;z; tÞ ¼
1 X 1 X 1 Z X
2
2
2
@ DT F @ DT F @ DT F @ DT F k1 ðzÞ k2 ðzÞ k3 ðzÞ @t @x2 @y2 @z2
000
¼ f ðx; y; z; tÞ
x
ð57aÞ
ð50Þ
2 2 2 !, ip jp p cðzl Þqðzl Þ þ k2 ðzl Þ þ k3 ðzl Þ a b 2ðh HÞ
x00ij ðzl Þ ¼ k1 ðzl Þ
ð57bÞ where the subscript l denotes the arbitrary discrete layer, the expressions of zl and ki ðzl Þ show the same as Eqs. (23) and (24), the expressions cðzl Þ and qðzl Þ are
cðzl Þ ¼
where 000
00
f ðx; y; z; tÞ ¼ f ðx; y; tÞ sin
ðz HÞp 2ðh HÞ
ð58aÞ
n h þ zl =ðH hÞ ðqm qc Þ þ qc hH
qðzl Þ ¼
ð52Þ
where cm and cc are, respectively, specific heat of metal and ceramic materials in present model, qm and qc are density of metal and ceramic materials, respectively. Substituting Eqs. (56)–(58) into Eq. (55), with the initial condition Wl ð0Þ ¼ 0, yields
1 X 1 X 64F 0 jpðy0 þ yd Þ jpy0 f ðx; y; tÞ ¼ cos cos b ayd hijp2 b i¼1 j¼1 ipx jpy sin a b
n h þ zl =ðH hÞ ðcm cc Þ þ cc hH
ð51Þ
00
sin
2 2 !, ip jp p 2 cðzl Þqðzl Þ k1 ðzl Þ þk2 ðzl Þ þk3 ðzl Þ a b ðhHÞ
0 ij ðzl Þ ¼
t
For the FGM layer, the expression of the heat conduction equation is
cðzÞqðzÞ
As x0ij ðzÞ and x00ij ðzÞ are related to the z coordinate, they can be divided into
And the continuity boundary condition is the similar as Eqs. (28a,b) for discrete FGM layer, only adding the time variable for temperature increment. In order to satisfy Eqs. (39c) and (40a), the temperature increment function for the FGM layer DT F ðx; y; z; tÞ can be expanded as
Wl ðtÞ ¼
ð58bÞ
A1 B h x0 ðz Þt tðxijk þx0ij ðzl Þ t x0 ðz Þ 1 e ij l e ð1 þ e ij l Þ x0ij ðzl Þ e
tðxijk þx0ij ðzl ÞÞ
x0ij ðzl Þt
ð1 þ exijk t Þð1 þ e
Þ
x00ij ðzl Þ Z 2 ðzl Þ xijk Z 1 ðzl Þ ð59Þ
658
H.-J. Jiang, H.-L. Dai / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 652–666
See the right side of Eq. (59),
Z 2 ðzl Þ Z 1 ðzl Þ
show as
0 0
type when zl ¼ H.
Based on L’Hospital’s rule, the expression Wl ðtÞ can be rewritten as
Wl ðtÞ ¼
A1 B x0 ðz Þt tðxijk þx0ij ðzl Þ t x0 ðz Þ ð1 þ e ij l Þ 1 e ij l e 0 2xij ðzl Þ 00 tðxijk þx0ij ðzl ÞÞ x0 ðz Þt xij ðzl Þ e ð1 þ exijk t Þð1 þ e ij l Þ
xijk
ð60Þ
method and Newmark method be considered to solve this temperature problem. Based on the symmetry of the structure and loading, a quarter of coating/FGM plate is considered in the computation, i.e. the calculated region is 0 6 n 6 1=2, 0 6 g 6 1=2, 0 6 n 6 1=2 (n ¼ x=a, g ¼ y=b, f ¼ z=H). The region is divided into l l l square portions, implying that the length of square L is equal to 1=2l. For the first order partial derivative function:
Substituting Eqs. (59) and (60) into Eq. (53), yields
DT F ðx; y; zl ; tÞ ¼
DT 1F ðx; y; zl ; tÞ 1 6 l 6 N 1 DT 2F ðx; y; zl ; tÞ l ¼ N
3. Numerical examples and discussion In the following examples, some of the basic parameters are shown in Tables 1 and 2, the heat conduction coefficients and density of the FGM are selected (the top ceramic material is Si3 N4 , the bottom metal material is SUS304) are shown as [61]: k3c ¼ 13:723 W=m K, qc ¼ 2370 kg=m3 , k3m ¼ 15:379 W=m K, 3 qm ¼ 8166 kg=m . Example 1. This example mainly discusses the steady temperature increment distribution for the double-layer (coating/FGM) plate along z coordinate. When considering the temperature dependence of thermal conductivity, the effective thermal conductivity of the coating layer and FGM layer can be expressed respectively as [60–62]
kei ¼ ki0 þ ki1 DT þ ki2 DT 2 þ ki3 DT 3 l
ð62Þ
n h h 0 0 0 0 þ z=ðH hÞ ðkim0 þ kim1 DT þ kim2 DT 2 þ kim3 DT 3 Þ hH i 0 0 0 0 kic0 þ kic1 DT þ kic2 DT 2 þ kic3 DT 3 Þ 0
0
0
0
þ ðkic0 þ kic1 DT þ kic2 DT 2 þ kic3 DT 3 Þ; 0
i ¼ ð1; 2; 3Þ
ð63Þ
0
where the coefficient kij , kimj and kicj ðj ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ are the same as reference [71]. Considering thermal resistance between the coating layer and FGM layer as well as discrete FGM layers, yields
DT c Rb ¼ 0 f
DT 0F
; RbF ¼
DT lF
1 ½DTði þ 1; j; k; tÞ DTði 1; j; k; tÞ 2L
ð65aÞ
DT ;g ði; j; k; tÞ ¼
1 ½DTði; j þ 1; k; tÞ DTði; j 1; k; tÞ 2L
ð65bÞ
DT ;f ði; j; k; tÞ ¼
1 ½DTði; j; k þ 1; tÞ DTði; j; k 1; tÞ 2L
ð65cÞ
ð61Þ
where expression of DT 1F ðx; y; z; tÞ and DT 2F ðx; y; z; tÞ are shown in Appendix B.
kei ðzÞ ¼
DT ;n ði; j; k; tÞ ¼
DT lþ1 F 000
ð64Þ
f
With two above-mentioned factors(temperature dependence of thermal conductivity and thermal resistance), heat conduction equation cannot be solved analytically. Thus the finite difference Table 1 Principal geometry parameters of double-layer (coating/FGM) plate. Length a (m)
Width b (m)
Thickness of coating layer h (m)
Total thickness H (m)
1
0.5
0.005
0.02
For the second order partial derivative function:
DT ;nn ði; j; k; tÞ ¼
1 L2
½DTði þ 1; j; k; tÞ 2DTði; j; k; tÞ þ DTði 1; j; k; tÞ ð66aÞ
DT ;gg ði; j; k; tÞ ¼
1 L2
½DTði; j þ 1; k; tÞ 2DTði; j; k; tÞ þ DTði; j 1; k; tÞ ð66bÞ
DT ;ff ði; j; k; tÞ ¼
1 L2
½DTði; j; k þ 1; tÞ 2DTði; j; k; tÞ þ DTði; j; k 1; tÞ ð66cÞ
The high order nonlinear equilibrium relative to temperature DT should be linearized while considering material parameters changing accompany with temperature. In arbitrary step of iteration J, the high order nonlinear terms relative to DT should be linearized, and the form can be adopted as follows:
ðDT N ÞJ ¼ ðDT DT N1 ÞJ ¼ ðDTÞJ ðDTÞN1 JP
ð67Þ
where N is a constant, ðDTÞJp is the mean value of the first two iteration. For different step of iteration, ðDTÞJp can be adopted as
J¼1:
ðDTÞJp ¼ DT 1
J¼2:
ðDTÞJp ¼ ½DT 1 þ ðDTÞJ1 =2
JP3:
ðDTÞJp ¼ ½ðDTÞJ1 þ ðDTÞJ2 =2
ð68Þ
Fig. 3 denotes influence of number of the Fourier series item on the steady temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along z coordinate at point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ. From Fig. 3, it is seen easily that the convergence of the present serial solution is achieved by using only 81 terms, and the full convergence is demonstrated with 100 terms. And in the subsequent examples of steady heat conduction analysis, the number of Fourier series item is always selected as 100. Fig. 4 gives effect of temperature dependence and thermal resistance on steady temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate when F 0 ¼ 102 J and F 0 ¼ 104 J . From this figure, it can be found that this two factors basically do not affect the on temperature when F 0 ¼ 102 J, and have little effect on tem-
Table 2 Basic parameters of coating and local heat source. Heat conduction coefficient (W/m K)
Discrete layer number
Location of local heat source (m)
Width of heat source (m)
k1 = 0.04 k2 = 0.04 k3 = 0.06
150
b/4
b/20
perature when F 0 ¼ 104 J. In other words, this investigated heat source is too small to greatly change heat conductivity of plate, namely, the temperature dependence and thermal resistance can be ignored in present model. Fig. 5 shows influence of heat flow F 0 on the steady temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate’s along z coordinate at the point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ. From Fig. 5, the steady
659
H.-J. Jiang, H.-L. Dai / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 652–666
0.08
0.025 9 Terms, coating layer 9 Terms, FGM layer
25 Terms, coating layer 25 Terms, FGM layer
0.020
0.06
F0=100J, coating layer
F0=300J, coating layer
F0=100J, FGM layer
F0=300J, FGM layer
F0=500J, coating layer
F0=700J, coating layer
F0=500J, FGM layer
F0=700J, FGM layer
0.015 Δ T [K]
ΔT [K]
0.04
0.02
0.010 0.005
0.00
-0.02 0.0
49 Terms, coating layer 49 Terms, FGM layer
81 Terms, coating layer 81 Terms, FGM layer
0.000
100 Terms, coating layer 100 Terms, FGM layer
-0.005
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6 * Z =Z/H
Z*=Z/H Fig. 3. Effect of number of Fourier series item on the double-layer plate’s steady temperature increment distribution along z coordinate at point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ.
2
F0=10 J 0.012
0.024
0.008
Δ T [K]
0.000 1.6
temperture independence coating layer temperture independence FGM layer temperture dependencecoating layer temperture dependence FGM layer
coating layer N=50, FGM layer
coating layer N=150, FGM layer
coating layer N=250, FGM layer
coating layer N=400, FGM layer
0.018 4
F0=10 J
1.2 0.8
ΔT [K]
0.004
1.0
Fig. 5. Effect of heat flow F 0 on the double-layer plate’s steady temperature increment distribution along z coordinate at point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ.
0.030
0.016
0.8
0.012
0.006
0.4 0.0
0.0
0.000
0.2
0.4
0.6
* Z =Z/H
0.8
1.0 0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
∗
Z =Z/H Fig. 4. Effect of temperature dependence and thermal resistance on steady temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate when F 0 ¼ 102 J and F 0 ¼ 104 J.
Fig. 6. Effect of number of discrete layers N on the double-layer plate’s steady temperature increment distribution along z coordinate at point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ.
temperature increment increases with the increasing of heat flow F 0 . The steady temperature increment increases along the z coordinate, and arrives at the maximum value at z ¼ h (adhesive position), then the steady temperature increment decreases gradually along the z coordinate. Fig. 6 depicts influence of number of discrete layers N on the steady temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along z coordinate at the point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ. From Fig. 6, one knows that the steady temperature increment increases with the increasing of discrete layer N, it can be concluded that the single complete structure could sustain a more high temperature. And the maximum value of the steady temperature increment occurs at the interface of the structure (z ¼ h). Fig. 7 reveals influence of local heat source zone on the steady temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along z coordinate at the point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ. Seen from Fig. 7, when y0 < b=2, the steady temperature increment decreases with the increasing of y0 , and the maximum temperature increment still happens at z ¼ h. When y0 ¼ b=2, the temperature increment has a sudden change at the coating layer of the double-layer plate, the magnitude of temperature is about 15 times comparing with the case when y0 < b=2, and the maximum steady temperature increment occurs at z ¼ 0:1H. This bizarre phenomenon can
be explained that the local heat source is just at the point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ. Fig. 8 shows influence of the local heat source strip’s width (i.e. yd ) on the steady temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along z coordinate at the point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ. Seen from Fig. 8, the change trend of the steady temperature increments of the coating layer for the double-layer plate is merely the same when yd ¼ b=20 and yd ¼ b=5. The steady temperature increment of the coating layer for the double-layer plate has a sudden increase which is similar with a parabolic type when yd ¼ b=2 and yd ¼ 7b=10, the amplitude of the former steady temperature increment for the coating layer is larger than the latter, but it is just opposite on the FGM layer. Fig. 9 depicts influence of thickness ratio H=h (the ratio of the total plate thickness to coating layer thickness) on the steady temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along z coordinate at the point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ. From Fig. 9, the steady temperature increment decreases with the increasing of thickness ratio H=h. Thus, the thicker the coating layer is, the greater the steady temperature changes. Fig. 10 demonstrates influence of the length–width ratio a=b on the steady temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along z coordinate at the point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ. It can be
660
H.-J. Jiang, H.-L. Dai / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 652–666
0.32
0.016
H/h=4, coating layer H/h=4, FGM layer
y 0=b/2
H/h=10, coating layer H/h=10, FGM layer
0.24
0.012 0.16
FGM layer
0.008
0.00
coating layer
0.015
coating layer
ΔT [K]
ΔT [K]
0.08
y 0=b/4 y 0=b/3
0.010
0.000 H/h=20, coating layer H/h=20, FGM layer
0.005
FGM layer
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
H/h=40, coating layer H/h=40, FGM layer
-0.004
0.000 0.0
0.004
y 0=b/5
0.8
1.0
∗
Z =Z/H
0.2
0.4
0.6
Z∗=Z/H
0.8
1.0
Fig. 9. Effect of thickness ratio H=h on the double-layer plate’s steady temperature increment distribution along the z coordinate at point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ.
Fig. 7. Effect of location of heat source y0 on the double-layer plate’s steady temperature increment distribution along the z coordinate at point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ.
0.016
a/b=2, coating layer a/b=2, FGM layer
a/b=6, coating layer a/b=6, FGM layer
0.012
0.08 yd=b/2
0.06
yd=7b/10
ΔT [K]
0.008
0.04 0.02
0.004
ΔT [K]
coating layer
0.00 0.016
FGM layer
0.000
FGM layer
0.012
yd=b/20
coating layer
-0.004 0.0
yd=b/5
0.008
a/b=20, coating layer a/b=20, FGM layer
a/b=10, coating layer a/b=10, FGM layer
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
∗
Z =Z/H
0.004 Fig. 10. Effect of length–width ratio a=b on the double-layer plate’s steady temperature increment distribution along the z coordinate at point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ.
0.000 0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
∗
Z =Z/H Fig. 8. Effect of heat source strip’s width yd on the double-layer plate’s steady temperature increment distribution along the z coordinate at point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ.
seen from Fig. 10 that the temperature increment decreases with the increasing of length–width ratio a=b. Accordingly, the length– width ratio a=b is a key factor which could guide designing such a steady temperature problem of the double-layer plate. Fig. 11 reveals influence of the selected coating material (mainly the fact of heat conduction coefficient k3 ) on the steady temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along z coordinate at the point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ. From Fig. 10, it can be easily obtained that the temperature increment decreases with the increasing of coefficient k3 . Example 2. This example mainly investigates the steady temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along x coordinate at the point ðy ¼ b=2; z ¼ hÞ and the steady temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate with the movement of the heat source location y0 along the width direction at the point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2; z ¼ hÞ.
Fig. 12 depicts influence of the heat flow F 0 on the steady temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along x coordinate at the point ðy ¼ b=2; z ¼ hÞ. It is seen from Fig. 12 that the steady temperature increment increases with the increasing of heat flow F 0 . For arbitrary curve, the temperature increment has a sudden increase near x ¼ 0, remains unchanged on the whole, and finally decreases rapidly near x ¼ a. Fig. 13 shows the steady temperature increment distribution with the movement of heat source location y0 along the y coordinate at the point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2; z ¼ hÞ. From Fig. 13, when location of heat source y0 moves on both ends of width boundary, the temperature increment at the point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2; z ¼ hÞ arrives at a certain peak value, and maintains flat when the location of heat source y0 moves on other location. When y0 > 19b=20, the temperature increment has an abrupt decreasing at point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2; z ¼ hÞ as the location of heat source exceeds the boundary of the double-layer plate. Example 3. In order to validate the present method on the transient heat conduction analysis, degenerate the double-layer plate into a single layer whose parameters are the same as Araya and Gutierrez [72,73], dimensions of the single layer are
661
H.-J. Jiang, H.-L. Dai / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 652–666
0.016
∗
∗
k 3 =k3, coating layer
k3 =5k3 , coating layer
FGM layer
FGM layer
1400
1000 800
0.008
ΔT [K]
ΔT [K]
0.012
0.004
0.000
600 400
0.2
200
∗
∗
k3 =20k3 , coating layer
k 3 =10k3, coating layer
FGM layer
FGM layer
0.0
Araya and Gutierrez [72] Gutierrez and Araya [73] Present
1200
0.4
0.6
0.8
0
1.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
∗
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
∗
Z =Z/H
Y =y/b k3
Fig. 11. Effect of heat conduction coefficient for selected coating material on the double-layer plate’s steady temperature increment distribution along the z coordinate at point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ.
Fig. 14. Comparison of the present method with Araya and Gutierrez [72,73] in the y coordinate on the top surface ðz ¼ 0Þ.
0.025 25
y=b/2, z=h, F0=700J
0.020
5 terms of Fourier series 15 terms of Fourier series 25 terms of Fourier series 45 terms of Fourier series 65 terms of Fourier series
y=b/2, z=h, F0=500J
0.010
y=b/2, z=h, F0=300J
0.005
y=b/2, z=h, F0=100J
15
ΔT [K]
ΔT [K]
20
0.015
10 5
0.000 0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
∗
0
X =X/a
10
20
30
40
50
Time (s) Fig. 12. Effect of heat flow F 0 on the double-layer plate’s steady temperature increment distribution along the x coordinate at point ðy ¼ b=2; z ¼ hÞ.
Fig. 15. Effect of number of Fourier series item on the double-layer plate’s transient temperature increment distribution with the increasing of time at point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2; z ¼ hÞ.
0.3 2
0.2
1.8 F0=10 J 1.2 0.6 temperature independence coating layer temperature independence FGM layer temperature dependence coating layer temperature dependence FGM layer
0.0
0.0
-0.1
Δ T [K]
ΔT [K]
0.1
F0=100J
120
F0=300J -0.2
F0=500J
60
F0=700J
0
-0.3 0.0
-0.6 180 F0=104J
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
∗
Y =y0/b Fig. 13. The double-layer plate’s steady temperature increment distribution with the move of heat source location y0 along the width direction at point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2; z ¼ hÞ.
-60 0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6 * Z =Z/H
0.8
1.0
Fig. 16. Effect of temperature dependence and thermal resistance on transient temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate when F 0 ¼ 102 J and F 0 ¼ 104 J.
662
H.-J. Jiang, H.-L. Dai / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 652–666
15 F0=100J, coating layer
y0=b/2
0
F0=100J, FGM layer F0=300J, coating layer
10
-800
F0=300J, FGM layer
FGM layer
F0=500J, coating layer
5
-1600
F0=700J, coating layer F0=700J, FGM layer
coating layer
ΔT [K]
Δ T [K]
F0=500J, FGM layer
0
-2400
10 coating layer
0 -5 0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
-10
∗
Z =Z/H
FGM layer
-20
Fig. 17. Effect of heat flow F 0 on the double-layer plate’s transient temperature increment distribution along z coordinate at t ¼ 15 s.
y0=b/5
-30 0.0 0:02 m 0:04 m 0:00625 m along X, Y and Z directions, respectively. Y coordinate in reference[73] is corresponding to x coordinate in present model, laser position is at 0:75Ly , where Ly the tool insert dimension in the Y direction, laser speed 0.1 m/s and laser net power 50 W, the comparison of temperature distribution along y coordinate on top surface (i.e. along X coordinate in reference [73]) is shown in Fig. 14, it can be found that the temperature has a sudden decrease across the y coordinate on top surface. And seen from the curves of the figure, the results are nearly the same, which indicates that the present method is feasible.
0.6
0.8
Fig. 19. Effect of location of heat source y0 on the double-layer plate’s transient temperature increment distribution along the z coordinate at t ¼ 15 s.
Fig. 15 shows influence of number of Fourier series item on the transient temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate at the point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2; z ¼ hÞ. From Fig. 15, one knows, the convergence of the present series solution is achieved by using only 45 terms, and the full convergence is demonstrated with 65 terms in the example. When t > 15 s, the transient temperature remains unchanged by and large, which denotes that the temperature distribution achieves steady state basically. Accordingly, the time of transient temperature is selected as t ¼ 15 s in the following transient heat conduction analysis.
10
10
8
8
6
6 4 coating layer
2
coating layer
2
0
FGM layer
-2 0.0 10
0.2
0.4
0.8
N=150
-2 1.0 0.0 10
8
8
6
6
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
4 coating layer
coating layer
2
2 FGM layer
0 -2 0.0
FGM layer
0
N=50 0.6
0.2
0.4
0
N=250 0.6
0.8
1.0
Z =Z/H
4
ΔT [K]
0.4 ∗
Examples 4. This example mainly studies the transient temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along z coordinate, and all parameters are the same as the analysis of the steady heat conduction problem.
4
0.2
y0=b/3
y0=b/4
1.0
-2 0.0
FGM layer
0.2
0.4
N=400 0.6
0.8
1.0
∗
Z =Z/H Fig. 18. Effect of number of discrete layers N on the double-layer plate’s transient temperature increment distribution along z coordinate at t ¼ 15 s.
663
H.-J. Jiang, H.-L. Dai / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 652–666
along z coordinate at t ¼ 15 s. It is seen from Fig. 17 that the transient temperature increment increases with the increasing of the heat flow F 0 . The transient temperature of the coating layer presents similarly with the sinusoid type, and the maximum transient temperature increment happens at z ¼ 0:75H. Fig. 18 demonstrates effect of number of discrete layers N on the transient temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along z coordinate at t ¼ 15 s . Watching from Fig. 18, the transient temperature distribution of the double-layer plate shows the same trend with different discrete layers N. Fig. 19 denotes influence of the location of heat source y0 on the transient temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along z coordinate at t ¼ 15 s. From Fig. 19, the transient temperature is merely the same when y0 ¼ b=5 and y0 ¼ b=4. The transient temperature achieved is a negative value when y0 ¼ b=3 and y0 ¼ b=2, the former magnitude is less than the latter. This phenomenon can be attributed to concentration of a local heat source near y0 ¼ b=2. Fig. 20 reveals influence of the heat source strip’s width yd on the transient temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along z coordinate at t ¼ 15 s. It can be seen from Fig. 20 that the change trend of the transient temperature distribution is similar when yd ¼ b=20 and yd ¼ b=5 at the coating layer, and the former temperature is a little greater than the later on the FGM layer. The magnitude of transient temperature decreases a lot when yd ¼ b=2 and yd ¼ 7b=10, and the closer it gets to yd ¼ b=2, the greater the transient temperature decreases. Fig. 21 demonstrates influence of thickness ratio H=h (the ratio of the total plate thickness to coating layer thickness) on the transient temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along z coordinate at t ¼ 15 s. Seen from Fig. 21 that the transient temperature increment on the coating layer decreases with the increasing of thickness ratio H=h. On the other hand, the transient temperature increment on the FGM layer increases with the increasing of thickness ratio H=h (except at H=h ¼ 10, it can be speculated that this thickness ratio for double-layer plate could sustain less temperature).
yd=b/2
0
yd=7b/10 -120 -240
ΔT [K]
-360 coating layer -480
FGM layer
12 FGM layer 9 6
coating layer
3
yd=b/20 yd=b/5
0 -3 0.0
0.2
0.4
∗
0.6
0.8
1.0
Z =Z/H Fig. 20. Effect of heat source strip’s width yd on the double-layer plate’s transient temperature increment distribution along the z coordinate at t ¼ 15 s.
Fig. 16 gives effect of temperature dependence and thermal resistance on transient temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate when F 0 ¼ 102 J and F 0 ¼ 104 J. From the Fig. 16, this two factors basically do not affect the on temperature when F 0 ¼ 102 J, but have great influence on temperature increment when F 0 ¼ 104 J. Namely, the temperature dependence and thermal resistance must be taken into account when applied with high energy heat source, but they can be ignored when the order of magnitude for heat source is 102 J for present model. Fig. 17 depicts influence of the heat flow F 0 on the transient temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate
10 8
6 H/h=4, coating layer H/h=4, FGM layer
5
H/h=10, coating layer H/h=10, FGM layer
4
6
3
4
2
2
1 0
ΔT [K]
0 -2 0.0 12
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
H/h=20, coating layer H/h=20, FGM layer
0.0 25 20
10 8
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
H/h=40, coating layer H/h=40, FGM layer
15 0.04
6
10
0.02
4
0.00
5
-0.02
2
0.0
-0.04 0.0000.0050.0100.0150.0200.025
0
0 0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
∗
Z =Z/H Fig. 21. Effect of thickness ratio H=h on the double-layer plate’s transient temperature increment distribution along the z coordinate at t ¼ 15 s.
664
H.-J. Jiang, H.-L. Dai / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 652–666
4
0.6 0.4
3
FGM layer
0.2 coating layer
coating layer n=0.5 n=1 n=5 n=20
2
ΔT [K]
-0.2
a=10b
a=6b
Δ Τ [Κ]
0.0 a=20b
1
10.5 0
7.0 -1 0.0
3.5 coating layer
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Z*=Z/H FGM layer
0.0
a=2b
-3.5 0.0
0.2
0.4
∗
0.6
0.8
1.0
Fig. 24. Effect of functionally graded index n on the double-layer plate’s transient temperature increment distribution along the z coordinate at ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ and t ¼ 15 s.
Z =Z/H Fig. 22. Effect of length–width ratio a=b on the double-layer plate’s transient temperature increment distribution along the z coordinate at t ¼ 15 s.
Fig. 22 shows effect of length–width ratio a=b on the transient temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along z coordinate at t ¼ 15 s. From Fig. 22, both the transient temperature increments of the double-layer plate decrease with the increasing of length–width ratio a=b. Fig. 23 depicts effect of the selected coating material (mainly the fact of heat conduction coefficient k3 ) on the transient temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along z coordinate at t ¼ 15 s. From Fig. 23, it can be easily found that the temperature increment of the coating layer decreases with the increasing of heat conduction coefficient k3 , but it is just the opposite changing trend on the FGM layer. Fig. 24 demonstrates effect of the functionally graded index n on the transient temperature increment distribution for the double-layer plate along z coordinate at the point ðx ¼ a=2; y ¼ b=2Þ and t ¼ 15 s. It can be seen from Fig. 24 that the transient temperature of FGM layer for double-layer plate
12
∗
k3 =k3, coating layer FGM layer
9
∗
k3 =5k3, coating layer FGM layer ∗
Δ T [K]
6
4. Conclusions Analytical solutions of the steady and transient temperature increment distribution for a double-layer (coating/FGM) plate are presented. By means of numerical examples, some conclusions can be drawn as follows (1) Both the amplitude of steady and transient temperature increments for the double-layer (coating/FGM) plate vary a lot on which the local heat source applied, it can be attributed to the temperature concentration. (2) Both the steady and transient temperature increments of the double-layer plate decrease with the increasing of length– width ratio a=b, which could provide optimal design for the double-layer plate under the hostile temperature environment. (3) The temperature increment of the FGM layer for the double-layer plate decreases with the increasing of the thickness ratio H=h and heat conduction coefficient k3 on the steady heat conduction analysis, but it is just opposite on the transient heat conduction process. (4) The temperature dependence of thermal conductivity as well as the effect of the thermal boundary resistance can be ignored in this present model because of low heat source.
k3 =10k3, coating layer FGM layer
Conflict of interest
∗
k3 =20k3, coating layer FGM layer
None declared.
3
0
-3 0.0
decreases with the increasing of functionally graded index n, which could help us in designing high temperature-resistance structure.
Acknowledgments
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Z*=Z/H
Fig. 23. Effect of heat conduction coefficient for selected coating material k3 on the double-layer plate’s transient temperature increment distribution along the z coordinate at t ¼ 15 s.
The authors wish to thank reviewers for their valuable comments and the research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11372105), New Century Excellent Talents Program in University (NCET-13-0184), State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body (71475004) and Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate (CX2013B148).
H.-J. Jiang, H.-L. Dai / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 652–666
Appendix A
ðzlþ1 HÞp ðzl HÞp C l1 ¼ 16DT b sin sinhðsl zl Þ sin sinhðslþ1 zlþ1 Þ 2ðh HÞ 2ðh HÞ 2 lþ1 l = ijp ½coshðs zlþ1 Þ sinhðs zl Þ coshðsl zl Þ sinhðslþ1 zlþ1 Þ ðzl HÞp ðzlþ1 HÞp C l2 ¼ 16DT b sin coshðslþ1 zlþ1 Þ sin coshðsl zl Þ 2ðh HÞ 2ðh HÞ = ijp2 ½coshðslþ1 zlþ1 Þ sinhðsl zl Þ coshðsl zl Þ sinhðslþ1 zlþ1 Þ Appendix B
DT 1F ðx; y; z; tÞ ¼
1 X 1 X A1 B x0 ðz Þt f1 e ij l et ½xijk þ x0ij ðzl Þ½1 0 x ðz Þ ij l i¼1 j¼1
þ et x0ij ðzl Þ et x0ij ðzl Þt
ð1 þ e
x00ij ðzl Þ ½xijk þ x0ij ðzl Þð1 þ exijk t Þ xijk
Þg X i ðxÞY j ðyÞZ 2 ðzl Þ þ
1 X 1 X
A1 B
i¼1 j¼1
DT 2F ðx; y; z; tÞ ¼
1 exijk t
xijk
1 X 1 X i¼1 j¼1
X i ðxÞY j ðyÞZ 2 ðzl Þ
A1 B x0 ðz Þt f1 e ij l et ½xijk þ x0ij ðzl Þ½1 2x0ij ðzl Þ
þ et x0ij ðzl Þ et x0ij ðzl Þt
½1 þ e
x00ij ðzl Þ ½xijk þ x0ij ðzl Þð1 þ exijk t Þ xijk
gX i ðxÞY j ðyÞZ 1 ðzl Þ þ
1 X 1 X A1 B i¼1 j¼1
1 exijk t
xijk
X i ðxÞY j ðyÞZ 2 ðzl Þ
References [1] H.J. Ding, H.M. Wang, W.Q. Chen, A solution of a non-homogeneous orthotropic cylindrical shell for axisymmetric plane strain dynamic thermoelastic problems, J. Sound Vib. 263 (2003) 815–829. [2] T. Sadowski, M. Boniecki, Z. Librant, K. Nakonieczny, Theoretical prediction and experimental verification of temperature distribution in FGM cylindrical plates subjected to thermal shock, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 50 (2007) 4461–4467. [3] B. Skoczen´, Functionally graded structural members obtained via the low temperature strain induced phase transformation, Int. J. Solids Struct. 44 (2007) 5182–5207. [4] S.H. Mallik, M. Kanoria, Generalized thermoelastic functionally graded solid with a periodically varying heat source, Int. J. Solids Struct. 44 (2007) 7633– 7645. [5] X. Wang, E. Pan, A.K. Roy, Three-dimensional Green’s functions for a steady point heat source in a functionally graded half-space and some related problems, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 45 (2007) 939–950. [6] H.M. Yin, G.H. Paulino, W.G. Buttlar, L.Z. Sun, Heat flux field for one spherical inhomogeneity embedded in a functionally graded material matrix, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 51 (2008) 3018–3024. [7] S. Brischetto, R. Leetsch, E. Carrera, T. Wallmersperger, B. Kröplin, Thermomechanical bending of functionally graded plates, J. Therm. Stress. 31 (2008) 286–308. [8] Y.M. Shabana, N. Noda, Numerical evaluation of the thermomechanical effective properties of a functionally graded material using the homogenization method, Int. J. Solids Struct. 45 (2008) 3494–3506. [9] H.S. Shen, Nonlinear thermal bending response of FGM plates due to heat conduction, Compos. Part B 38 (2007) 201–215. [10] H.S. Shen, S.R. Li, Postbuckling of sandwich plates with FGM face sheets and temperature-dependent properties, Compos. Part B 39 (2008) 332–344. [11] X.K. Xia, H.S. Shen, Vibration of post-buckled sandwich plates with FGM face sheets in a thermal environment, J. Sound Vib. 314 (2008) 254–274. [12] X.K. Xia, H.S. Shen, Vibration of postbuckled FGM hybrid laminated plates in thermal environment, Eng. Struct. 30 (2008) 2420–2435. [13] H.S. Shen, Torsional buckling and postbuckling of FGM cylindrical shells in thermal environments, Int. J. Nonlinear Mech. 44 (2009) 644–657.
665
[14] Z.X. Wang, H.S. Shen, Nonlinear dynamic response of sandwich plates with FGM face sheets resting on elastic foundations in thermal environments, Ocean Eng. 57 (2013) 99–110. [15] Y.Z. Feng, Z.H. Jin, Thermal fracture of functionally graded plate with parallel surface cracks, Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 22 (5) (2009) 453–464. [16] Q. Li, V.P. Iu, K.P. Kou, Three-dimensional vibration analysis of functionally graded material plates in thermal environment, J. Sound Vib. 324 (2009) 733– 750. [17] D. Sun, S.N. Luo, Wave propagation of functionally graded material plates in thermal environments, Ultrasonics 51 (2011) 940–952. [18] H.L. Dai, Y.N. Rao, H.J. Jiang, An analytical method for magnetothermoelastic analysis of functionally graded hollow cylinders, Appl. Math. Comput. 218 (2011) 1467–1477. [19] H.L. Dai, L. Yang, H.Y. Zheng, Magnetothermoelastic analysis of functionally graded hollow spherical structures under thermal and mechanical loads, Solid State Sci. 13 (2011) 372–378. [20] H.L. Dai, H.Y. Zheng, Buckling and post-buckling analyses for an axially compressed laminated cylindrical shell of FGM with PFRC in thermal environments, Eur. J. Mech. A – Solid 30 (2011) 913–923. [21] J. Hein, J. Storm, M. Kuna, Numerical thermal shock analysis of functionally graded and layered materials, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 60 (2012) 41–51. [22] P. Malekzadeh, A.R. Fiouz, M. Sobhrouyan, Three-dimensional free vibration of functionally graded truncated conical shells subjected to thermal environment, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 89 (2012) 210–221. [23] Y. Ootao, M. Ishihara, Three-dimensional solution for transient thermoelastic problem of a functionally graded rectangular plate with piecewise exponential law, Compos. Struct. 106 (2013) 672–680. [24] A.M. Limarga, T.L. Duong, G. Gregori, D.R. Clarke, High-temperature vibration damping of thermal barrier coating materials, Surf. Coat. Tech. 202 (2007) 693–697. [25] R. Rodríguez-Baracaldo, J.A. Benito, E.S. Puchi-Cabrera, M.H. Staia, High temperature wear resistance of (TiAl)N PVD coating on untreated and gas nitrided AISI H13 steel with different heat treatments, Wear 262 (2007) 380–389. [26] T. Polcar, R. Martinez, T. Vítu˚, L. Kopecky´, R. Rodriguez, A. Cavaleiro, High temperature tribology of CrN and multilayered Cr/CrN coatings, Surf. Coat. Tech. 203 (2009) 3254–3259. [27] T. Polcar, T. Vitu, L. Cvrcek, J. Vyskocil, A. Cavaleiro, Effects of carbon content on the high temperature friction and wear of chromium carbonitride coatings, Tribol. Int. 43 (2010) 1228–1233. [28] T. Polcar, A. Cavaleiro, High-temperature tribological properties of CrAlN, CrAlSiN and AlCrSiN coatings, Surf. Coat. Tech. 206 (2011) 1244–1251. [29] M. Urgen, V. Ezirmik, E. Senel, Z. Kahraman, K. Kazmanli, The effect of oxygen content on the temperature dependent tribological behavior of CrAOAN coatings, Surf. Coat. Tech. 203 (2009) 2272–2277. [30] J.C. Walker, I.M. Ross, C. Reinhard, W.M. Rainforth, P.Eh. Hovsepian, High temperature tribological performance of CrAlYN/CrN nanoscale multilayer coatings deposited on cATiAl, Wear 267 (2009) 965–975. [31] M.A. Samad, S.K. Sinha, Dry sliding and boundary lubrication performance of a UHMWPE/CNTs nanocomposite coating on steel substrates at elevated temperatures, Wear 270 (2011) 395–402. [32] H.W. Liu, X.J. Xu, M.H. Zhu, P.D. Ren, Z.R. Zhou, High temperature fretting wear behavior of WC-25Co coatings prepared by D-gun spraying on TiAAlAZr titanium alloy, Tribol. Int. 44 (2011) 1461–1470. [33] Q. Luo, Temperature dependent friction and wear of magnetron sputtered coating TiAlN/VN, Wear 271 (2011) 2058–2066. [34] W.S. Xia, H.O. Zhang, G.L. Wang, Y.Z. Yang, A novel integrated temperature investigation approach of sprayed coatings during APS process, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 209 (2009) 2897–2906. [35] O.A. Hodhod, A.M. Rashad, M.M. Abdel-Razek, A.M. Ragab, Coating protection of loaded RC columns to resist elevated temperature, Fire Saf. J. 44 (2009) 241– 249. [36] S. Matthews, B. James, M. Hyland, High temperature erosion of Cr3C2ANiCr thermal spray coatings – the role of phase microstructure, Surf. Coat. Tech. 203 (2009) 1144–1153. [37] S. Matthews, B. James, M. Hyland, The role of microstructure in the high temperature oxidation mechanism of Cr3C2ANiCr composite coatings, Corros. Sci. 51 (2009) 1172–1180. [38] C.T. Nguyen, H. Buscail, R. Cueff, C. Issartel, F. Riffard, S. Perrier, O. Poble, The effect of cerium oxide argon-annealed coatings on the high temperature oxidation of a FeCrAl alloy, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 (2009) 9480–9486. [39] A. Hernández, Z. Rossette, A. Mazur, J.A. Demeulenaere, Roque López Hernández, The effect of start-up cycle in ceramic coating used as thermal barrier for a gas turbine bucket, Appl. Therm. Eng. 29 (2009) 3056–3065. [40] A. Antonaia, A. Castaldo, M.L. Addonizio, S. Esposito, Stability of WAAl2O3 cermet based solar coating for receiver tube operating at high temperature, Sol. Energy Mat. Sol. C 94 (2010) 1604–1611. [41] Z.D. Han, A. Fina, G. Malucelli, G. Camino, Testing fire protective properties of intumescent coatings by in-line temperature measurements on a cone calorimeter, Prog. Org. Coat. 69 (2010) 475–480. [42] N. Ohtsu, M. Hayashi, J. Ueta, T. Kanno, Biofunctional calcium titanate coating on titanium by simple chemical treatment process using calcium-hydroxide slurry – effects of the heating temperatures, Prog. Org. Coat. 70 (2011) 353–357. [43] T. Zhang, Y. Bao, D.T. Gawne, P. Mason, Effect of a moving flame on the temperature of polymer coatings and substrates, Prog. Org. Coat. 70 (2011) 45–51.
666
H.-J. Jiang, H.-L. Dai / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 89 (2015) 652–666
[44] M. Kaur, H. Singh, S. Prakash, Surface engineering analysis of detonation-gun sprayed Cr3C2ANiCr coating under high-temperature oxidation and oxidationerosion environments, Surf. Coat. Tech. 206 (2011) 530–541. [45] M. Yu, W.-Y. Li, X.K. Suo, H.L. Liao, Effects of gas temperature and ceramic particle content on microstructure and microhardness of cold sprayed SiCp/Al 5056 composite coatings, Surf. Coat. Tech. 220 (2013) 102–106. [46] M. Srivastava, J.N. Balaraju, B. Ravisankar, C. Anandan, V.K.W. Grips, High temperature oxidation and corrosion behaviour of Ni/NiACoAAl composite coatings, Appl. Surf. Sci. 263 (2012) 597–607. [47] A.M. Abyzov, S.V. Kidalov, F.M. Shakhov, High thermal conductivity composite of diamond particles with tungsten coating in a copper matrix for heat sink application, Appl. Therm. Eng. 48 (2012) 72–80. [48] A. Arizmendi-Morquecho, A. Chávez-Valdez, J. Alvarez-Quintana, High temperature thermal barrier coatings from recycled fly ash cenospheres, Appl. Therm. Eng. 48 (2012) 117–121. [49] H.C. Barshilia, S. John, V. Mahajan, Nanometric multi-scale rough, transparent and anti-reflective ZnO superhydrophobic coatings on high temperature solar absorber surfaces, Sol. Energy Mat. Sol. C 107 (2012) 219–224. [50] N. Selvakumar, Harish C. Barshilia, Review of physical vapor deposited (PVD) spectrally selective coatings for mid- and high-temperature solar thermal applications, Sol. Energy Mat. Sol. C 98 (2012) 1–23. [51] B.L. Han, X.C. Lu, Effect of nano-sized CeF3 on microstructure, mechanical, high temperature friction and corrosion behavior of NiAW composite coatings, Surf. Coat. Tech. 203 (2009) 3656–3660. [52] Z.S. Chen, H.J. Li, Q.G. Fu, X.F. Qiang, Tribological behaviors of SiC/h-BN composite coating at elevated temperatures, Tribol. Int. 56 (2012) 58–65. [53] A. Freni, A. Frazzica, B. Dawoud, S. Chmielewski, L. Calabrese, L. Bonaccorsi, Adsorbent coatings for heat pumping applications: verification of hydrothermal and mechanic al stabilities, Appl. Therm. Eng. 50 (2013) 1658–1663. [54] H. Aydin, Combined effects of thermal barrier coating and blending with diesel fuel on usability of vegetable oils in diesel engines, Appl. Therm. Eng. 51 (2013) 623–629. [55] S.P. Barik, M. Kanoria, P.K. Chaudhuri, Steady state thermoelastic contact problem in a functionally graded material, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 46 (2008) 775–789. [56] S. Karampour, Dimensional two steady state thermal and mechanical stresses of a Poro-FGM spherical vessel, Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 46 (2012) 4880–4885. [57] L.L. Cao, H. Wang, Q.H. Qin, Fundamental solution based on graded element model for steady-state heat transfer in FGM, Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 25 (4) (2012) 377–392. [58] F.X. Zhou, S.R. Li, Y.M. Lai, Three-dimensional analysis for transient coupled thermoelastic response of a functionally graded rectangular plate, J. Sound Vib. 330 (2011) 3990–4001. [59] P. Malekzadeh, Y. Heydarpour, M.R. Golbahar Haghighi, M. Vaghefi, Transient response of rotating laminated functionally graded cylindrical shells in thermal environment, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 98 (2012) 43–56.
[60] M. Shariyat, A nonlinear Hermitian transfinite element method for transient behavior analysis of hollow functionally graded cylinders with temperaturedependent materials under thermo -mechanical loads, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 86 (2009) 280–289. [61] M. Shariyat, S.M.H. Lavasani, M. Khaghani, Nonlinear transient thermal stress and elastic wave propagation analyses of thick temperature-dependent FGM cylinders, using a second-order point-collocation method, Appl. Math. Modell. 34 (2010) 898–918. [62] M. Shariyat, Nonlinear transient stress and wave propagation analyses of the FGM thick cylinders, employing a unified generalized thermoelasticity theory, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 65 (2012) 24–37. [63] Y.T. Zhou, K.Y. Lee, D.H. Yu, Transient heat conduction in a functionally graded strip in contact with well stirred fluid with an outside heat source, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 54 (2011) 5438–5443. [64] Y. Ootao, Y. Tanigawa, Three-dimensional transient piezothermoelasticity in functionally graded rectangular plate bonded to a piezoelectric plate, Int. J. Solids Struct. 37 (2000) 4377–4401. [65] Y. Ootao, Y. Tanigawa, Three-dimensional solution for transient thermal stresses of functionally graded rectangular plate due to nonuniform heat supply, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 47 (2005) 1769–1788. [66] Y. Ootao, Y. Tanigawa, Transient thermal stresses of orthotropic functionally graded thick strip due to nonuniform heat supply, Struct. Eng. Mech. 20 (2005) 559–573. [67] Y. Ootao, Y. Tanigawa, Three-dimensional solution for transient thermal stresses of an orthotropic functionally graded rectangular plate, Compos. Struct. 80 (2007) 10–20. [68] I. Keles, C. Conker, Transient hyperbolic heat conduction in thick-walled FGM cylinders and spheres with exponentially-varying properties, Eur. J. Mech. A – Solid 30 (2011) 449–455. [69] C. Aksoylar, A. Ömercikoglu, Z. Mecitoglu, M.H. Omurtag, Nonlinear transient analysis of FGM and FML plates under blast loads by experimental and mixed FE methods, Compos. Struct. 94 (2012) 731–744. [70] H.J. Jiang, H.L. Dai, Effect of laser processing on three dimensional thermodynamic analysis for HSLA rectangular steel plates, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 82 (2015) 98–108. [71] C.Y. Zhao, T.J. Lu, H.P. Hodson, J.D. Jackson, The temperature dependence of effective thermal conductivity of open-celled steel alloy foams, Mat. Sci. Eng. A 367 (2004) 123–131. [72] G. Araya, G. Gutierrez, Analytical solution for a transient, three-dimensional temperature distribution due to a moving laser beam, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 49 (2006) 4124–4131. [73] G. Gutierrez, G. Araya, Temperature distribution in a finite solid due to a moving laser beam, in: Proceeding of IMECE, ASME Congress at Washington, DC, IMECE2003-42545, 2003.