S.V. (#72-30-37), a 3 yr old white male, was evaluated at Arkansas Children’s Hospital of a recurrent urinary tract infection. He was known to have a completely duplex urethra
because and was
thought to have duplication of the corpora cavernosa also. These findings have been previously rep0rted.l Previous voiding cystourethrography had not demonstrated vesicoureteral reflux. Because of the recurrent bacteriuria. the examination was repeated. Right-sided vesicoureteral reflux was demonstrated. To assess the character of the right ureteral orifice. endoscopy of the lower urinary tract was accomplished. A firm. pink-colored polyp measuring 3 x 5 mm was noted on the dorsal wall of the anterior urethra approximately 4 cm distal to the sphincter. The polyp was not friable. The remainder of the urethra demonstrated no abnormalities. In retrospect, the polyp could be recognized on both the antegrade and retrograde urethral studies (Figs. I and 2). The
Fig. 1.
From the Department Urology.
Arkansas
Addrex~ partment
reprinr
of‘Urolog,v.
Children’s requesrs
of L’rology.
Rock. Arh.
Retrograde
Univrrsit?:
Hospital. to: John
tiniverritv
Little I‘.
of Arkansas
College
urethral
polyp.
of’ Medicine,
and the Section
of
Rock. Arkansas.
Redman.
01 Arkansas
OXBOWindicates
College
M.D..
Associate
of Medicine,
Pyfessor
and
4301 Wc.vt Markham
Chairman, Street.
DeLittle
72201.
8~1I977 hr Grune & Stratton.
Journal
urethrogram;
of Pediatrx
Surgery,
Vol.
Im.
ISSN
12, No.
0012-3468
5 (October),
1977
735
REDMAN
Voiding
Fig. 2.
lesion was explored
through
cystourethrogram;
a midline
urethral
arrow
indicates
urethral
AND ROBINSON
polyp.
incision and was excised sharply
at its base. The
urethra was closed, and the patient healed without difficulty. Microscopically, epithelium
the lesion had a core of fibrovascular
(Figs. 3,4).
No inflammatory
tissue and was covered with transitional
cells were present.
DISCUSSION Polyps of the posterior protrusion
urethra
of the urethral
terior urethral
polyp.
wall.’
are usually congenital We cannot
The urethrotomy
provided
extirpation
Fig. 3.
and are thought an etiology
to arise as a defective
for the occurrence
It may only be assumed that the polyp in our patient
sidering the fact that he had other congenital transurethral
propose
excellent
genitourinary
exposure
for
photomicrograph
con-
anomalies.
complete
excision
of this
might have served as well.’
Low-power
of an an-
was congenital
of portion
of urethral
polyp.
lesion
although
ANTERIOR
Fig.
4.
URETHRAL
High-power
POLYP
photomicrograph
showing
transitional
cell covering
of polyp
and
fibrovascu-
lar stroma.
REFERENCES polyps of the 1. Downs RA: Congenital prostatic urethra. A review of the literature and report of two cases. Br J Urol 42:76, 1970 2. Dewolf
WC.
Fraley
EE:
Congenital
urethral polyp an the infant: Case report and review of the literature. J Urol 109:515. 1973 3. Redman JF. Bissada NK: Complete duplication of the urethra with probable diphallus. J Pediatr Surg IO: l35- 137. 1975