Antibiofilm and anticancer potential of β-glucan-binding protein-encrusted zinc oxide nanoparticles

Antibiofilm and anticancer potential of β-glucan-binding protein-encrusted zinc oxide nanoparticles

Journal Pre-proof Antibiofilm and anticancer potential of β-glucan-binding protein-encrusted zinc oxide nanoparticles Mani Divya, Marimuthu Govindaraj...

2MB Sizes 0 Downloads 8 Views

Journal Pre-proof Antibiofilm and anticancer potential of β-glucan-binding protein-encrusted zinc oxide nanoparticles Mani Divya, Marimuthu Govindarajan, Sivashanmugam Karthikeyan, Elumalai Preetham, Naiyf S. Alharbi, Shine Kadaikunnan, Jamal M. Khaled, Taghreed N. Almanaa, Baskaralingam Vaseeharan PII:

S0882-4010(19)32227-2

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2020.103992

Reference:

YMPAT 103992

To appear in:

Microbial Pathogenesis

Received Date: 23 December 2019 Revised Date:

20 January 2020

Accepted Date: 21 January 2020

Please cite this article as: Divya M, Govindarajan M, Karthikeyan S, Preetham E, Alharbi NS, Kadaikunnan S, Khaled JM, Almanaa TN, Vaseeharan B, Antibiofilm and anticancer potential of β-glucan-binding protein-encrusted zinc oxide nanoparticles, Microbial Pathogenesis (2020), doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2020.103992. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Author statement

Mani Divya: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software; Marimuthu Govindarajan: Writing - Review & Editing; Sivashanmugam Karthikeyan: Methodology, Software; Elumalai Preetham: Methodology, Software; Naiyf S. Alharbi: Resources, Validation; Shine Kadaikunnan: Formal analysis; Jamal M. Khaled: Visualization, Validation; Taghreed N. Almanaa: Formal analysis; Baskaralingam Vaseeharan: Conceptualization, supervision, Writing- review and editing

Graphical abstract

1

Antibiofilm and anticancer potential of β-glucan-binding protein-encrusted zinc

2

oxide nanoparticles

3 4

Mani Divyaa, Marimuthu Govindarajanb,c, Sivashanmugam Karthikeyand, Elumalai

5

Preethame, Naiyf S. Alharbif, Shine Kadaikunnanf, Jamal M. Khaledf, Taghreed N. Almanaaf,

6

Baskaralingam Vaseeharana*

7 8

a

9

Nanopharmacology Division, Department of Animal Health and Management, Alagappa

Biomaterials

and

Biotechnology

in

Animal

Health

Lab,

10

University, Karaikudi-630004, Tamil Nadu, India

11

b

12

Annamalai University, Annamalainagar 608 002, Tamil Nadu, India

13

c

14

for Women (Autonomous), Kumbakonam 612 001, Tamil Nadu, India

15

d

16

e

17

Panangad, Kerala, India

18

f

19

Saudi Arabia

Nanobiosciences

and

Unit of Vector Control, Phytochemistry and Nanotechnology, Department of Zoology,

Unit of Natural Products and Nanotechnology, Department of Zoology, Government College

School of Bioscience & Technology, VIT University, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India

School of Ocean Science and Technology, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies,

Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh,

20 21

* Corresponding Author. Baskaralingam Vaseeharan. Tel: +91 4565 225682. Fax: +91 4565

22

225202. E-mail: [email protected]

23

24 25

Abstract β-Glucan-binding protein (βGBP) is important for the rational expansion of molecular

26

biology. Here, zinc oxide nanoparticle (ZnONP) was synthesized using βGBP from the crab

27

Scylla serrata (Ss-βGBP-ZnONP). Ss-βGBP-ZnONP was observed as a 100 kDa band on

28

sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel and characterized with UV-vis spectroscopy at

29

350 nm. X-ray diffraction analysis displayed values consistent with those for zincite. Fourier

30

transform infrared spectroscopy revealed the presence of functional groups, including amide,

31

alcohol, alkane, alkyl halide, and alkene groups. The zeta potential (−5.36 mV) of these

32

particles indicated their stability, and transmission electron microscopy revealed the presence

33

of 50 nm nanocones. Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs were tested at 100 µg/mL against the gram-positive

34

Enterococcus faecalis and gram-negative Pseudomanas aeruginosa using confocal laser

35

scanning microscopy and the bacterial viability assay was also performed. The growth of

36

MCF7 breast cancer cells was inhibited following treatment with 75 µg/mL Ss-βGBP-

37

ZnONPs. Thus, Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs have the ability to control the growth of pathogenic

38

bacteria and inhibit the viability of MCF7 breast cancer cell lines.

39 40

Keywords

41

β-Glucan-binding protein; biofilm; confocal laser scanning microscopy; Pseudomanas

42

aeruginosa; cell line

43 44

45

1. Introduction

46

Nanotechnology has widespread applications in the field of science and medicine [1-6].

47

Nanoparticles (NPs) are used as imaging and therapeutic agents and their surfaces are often

48

coupled with biological molecules to reduce surface energy [7]. Metallic and metal oxide

49

NPs, including gold, silver, copper, titanium dioxide (TiO2), and zinc oxide (ZnO) particles,

50

play vital roles [8-11]. The ZnONPs have been used for various applications, including cell

51

imaging, drug delivery, and nanomedicine [12]. The ZnONPs are also used in goods such as

52

personal care products and are known to exhibit excellent antibacterial and UV blocking

53

properties. In vitro analyses have revealed the biocompatibility of ZnONPs [13]. The ZnONPs

54

serve as non-toxic, biocompatible, and safe drug carriers. Zinc is an important trace element

55

present in all body tissues, including the brain, muscle, bone, and skin [14]. Zinc is also

56

important for eukaryotes, as it is known to modulate several physiological functions [15]. In

57

biological systems, zinc has important roles in metabolic pathways such as the carbohydrate,

58

lipid, nucleic acid, and protein syntheses [16]. The NPs may interact with biomolecules such

59

as nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids, owing to their nano size [17]. Biological synthesis of

60

NPs is more labor- and time-intensive and expensive than physical and chemical methods

61

[18].

62

Cancer is an emerging disorder that is severely affecting human health. It is the second

63

leading cause of mortality worldwide. The prevalence of breast cancer is higher among

64

women [19] and corresponds to one-fifth of all cancer cases worldwide. Studies have

65

confirmed the cytotoxicity of ZnONPs on cancer cells, including HepG-2, MCF-7, Hela, U87,

66

and S91 cells [20]. To improve their targeting ability, these NPs are often coupled with

67

antibodies or peptides that bind to the receptors over expressed on cancer cells. Today,

68

different types of nanostructures, particularly ZnONPs, have gained significant attention

69

owing to their wider implications in cancer therapy [21]. The current anticancer

70

chemotherapies have restricted potential due to systemic toxicity, non-selective distribution,

71

and decreased bioavailability, which severely damage healthy tissues [22]. Some bioactive

72

compounds are used as chemopreventive agents against cancer [23]. Cancer therapies are

73

limited to radiation, surgery, and chemotherapy, all of which exert harmful effects on normal

74

cells. Nanotechnology has been employed for the targeted treatment of cancers. The

75

mechanism underlying ZnONP-induced toxicity involves oxidative stress and apoptosis in

76

selected cancer cells. The combination of macromolecules and NPs exerts strong effects on

77

biological systems, and ZnONPs have a potent activity against competent cancer cells [24].

78

The NPs have been applied in the field of cancer therapy to target useful anticancer drugs

79

in patients suffering from cancer [20]. β-1,3-Glucan-binding protein (β-GBP) is an abundant

80

protein in the hemolymph of invertebrates. It is involved in the response of invertebrates to

81

pathogenic microorganisms. β-GBP exerts phenoloxidase and peptidase activities [25].

82

However, the antimicrobial activity of β-GBP is yet undetermined. β-GBP has been purified

83

from a mixture of crustaceans, including Scylla serrata [26] and the mangrove crab

84

Episesarma tetragonum [27].

85

Here, β-GBP from S. serrata was used to coat ZnONP. The developed Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs

86

were purified, characterized, and functionally examined for their antibacterial activity against

87

gram-positive Enterococcus faecalis and gram-negative Pseudomanas aeruginosa. In

88

addition, cell viability of the selected bacterial strains was tested after treatment with 50 and

89

100 µg/mL Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs. We also determined the cytotoxicity of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs to

90

MCF7 cancer cells. We show that Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs inhibited the growth of bacteria and

91

suppressed the proliferation of MCF7 breast cancer cells. Hence, Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs may

92

serve as effective agents for the treatment of pathogenic bacteria and cancer cells.

93 94

2. Materials and methods

95 96

2.1. Purification and synthesis of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs βGBP from S. serrata was purified as previously reported [26]. Sodium dodecyl sulfate

97

polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) confirmed the size of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs to

98

be 100 kDa. For Ss-βGBP-ZnONP synthesis, 2.1 g of 0.02 M zinc acetate was dissolved in

99

500 mL distilled water and stirred for 20 min with a stirrer. The purified form of Ss-βGBP (5

100

mL) was added to the zinc acetate solution and the mixture was stirred for 12 h. The final

101

sample was calcined for 30 min at 100 °C to obtain Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs. The dried powder was

102

stored in a sealed container for further analysis.

103 104

2.2. Characterization of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs

105

The synthesized Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs (1 mL) were subjected to UV-Vis spectrum analysis

106

as a function of time on a spectrophotometer at 200-800 nm wavelength and 1 nm resolution.

107

The crystalline nature of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs was determined by X ray diffraction (XRD)

108

analysis (Powder X-ray diffractometer 1 X’ pert pro-P analytic) with λ value of 1.5406 Å.

109

Scanning was carried out at a 2θ range from 30 to 90. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)

110

spectrophotometry (Thermo scientific Nicolet 380) was used for the analysis of functional

111

sets. Finely powdered (150 mg) Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs were treated with potassium bromide and

112

subjected to vacuum treatment using a pelletizer. The infrared spectrum was recorded

113

between 4000 and 500 cm−1. Stabilized Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs were analyzed with a 90 plus

114

particle size analyzer (Brookhaven instruments corporation, Holtsville, NY, USA) under an

115

applied electric field, and zeta potential was recorded. Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs were placed on

116

copper stubs and their shape and size were observed by transmission electron microscopy

117

(TEM) (HITACHI; Model: S-3400N) under bright field. The Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs shape, size

118

and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) were confirmed using carbon coated grids. A

119

working voltage of 20 kV with secondary electron detectors at the elemental action was

120

indomitable with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX, Joel JSM-6510) analysis.

121 122

2.3. Potency of Ss-βGBP-ZnONP against bacterial biofilms

123

The effects of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs on bacterial biofilms were evaluated using gram-

124

positive E. faecalis and gram-negative P. aeruginosa with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent

125

assay (ELISA) plate reader. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was used for the

126

analysis of biofilm assay. Selected bacteria were cultured on glass pieces (1 × 1 cm) in

127

nutrient broth supplemented with Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs (50 and 100 µg/mL). As a control, Ss-

128

βGBP-ZnONPs were replaced with an equal concentration of bovine serum albumin (BSA).

129

The cells were incubated for 2 days at 36 °C and then stained with acridine orange (0.4%).

130

The cells were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and analyzed using CLSM with

131

488-nm argon laser and Zen software (Carl Zeiss, Germany).

132 133 134

2.4. Bacterial viability assay The bacterial viability assay was performed as reported by Velusamy et al. [28] using the

135

live/dead BacLight bacterial viability kit (Invitrogen, India). Live and dead bacterial cells

136

were labelled with SYTO®9 (green) fluorescence and propidium iodide (PI; red) fluorescence

137

staining agents, respectively. Overnight cultured bacterial cells were treated with Ss-βGBP-

138

ZnONPs (50 and 100 µg/mL) at 37 °C at 60 min. After treatment, the cells were centrifuged

139

for 10 min at 6000 ×g and the pellet was rinsed twice with PBS, followed by incubation with

140

5 µL of SYTO®9, PI, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in 990 µL of PBS. The cells were

141

stained with 10 µL SYTO® 9 and 20 µL of PI (1:2 ratio) at 27 °C for 15 min in the dark, and

142

subjected to CLSM.

143 144

2.5. Anticancer activity

145

The inhibitory effect of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs on MCF7 cancer cell growth was assessed

146

with the 3-4, 5-dimethyl thiazol-2yl-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay [29]. The

147

cells were cultured in ELISA plates (5000 cells in each well) for 1 day in the presence of 5,

148

25, 50, and 75 µg/mL of test agent. The absorbance spectra were measured at a wavelength of

149

595 nm using a microplate reader. Cell viability (% of control) was calculated as (ODtest −

150

ODblank)/(ODcontrol − ODblank), where ODtest is the optical density of the cells exposed to the

151

ZnO sample, ODcontrol is the optical density of the control sample, and ODblank is the optical

152

density of the wells without MCF7 cells.

153 154

3. Results

155

3.1. Synthesis and characterization of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs

156

ZnONPs were synthesized using the purified form of β-GBP from S. serrata following 30

157

min incubation. The treatment with zinc acetate resulted in a pale white precipitate, indicative

158

of the formation of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs. The size of the synthesized Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs was

159

confirmed to be 100 kDa by SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig.1). UV-vis spectrophotometry analysis

160

was performed at a wavelength of 350 nm (Fig.2). In brief, 0.1 mL of sample was prepared in

161

deionized H2O in a cuvette, and the change from bluish to pale white precipitate was

162

indicative of the synthesis of ZnONPs.

163

The diffraction peaks showed various Bragg’s expression at 2.8 (100), 2.5 (002), 2.4

164

(101), 1.9 (102), 1.6 (110), 1.4 (103), 1.3 (112), and 1.2 (202). The above mentioned values

165

were consistent with the values for zincite of ZnO phase (Joint committee on Powder

166

Diffraction Standards, JCPDS 75-0576; Fig.3). The ZnONPs present in Ss-βGBP were

167

determined with FTIR spectroscopy. The FTIR spectrum of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs confirmed

168

strong bands at 1644, 1022, and 892 cm−1 belonging to C = O, C-F, and =C-H, respectively.

169

Weak bands were observed at 1556 and 1407 cm−1 that corresponded to amide and alkene

170

groups, respectively. However, the broad spectrum of strong bands of alcohol at 3418 cm−1

171

was associated with O-H stretching.

172

Overall, the analysis demonstrated the presence of amide, alcohol, alkane, alkyl halide,

173

and alkene groups (Fig.4). Zeta potential value revealed the surface charge and stability of Ss-

174

βGBP-ZnONPs; its conductivity was 0.233 mS/cm and zeta potential, −5.36 mV (Fig.5).

175

These values demonstrate the complete stabilization of NPs as well as their efficiency to serve

176

as capping materials. TEM of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs revealed the presence of nano cones of 50

177

nm diameter (Fig.6a&b). Nature of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs and lattice spacing were observed with

178

selected area electron diffraction (Fig.6c). Zinc elemental composition of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs

179

was 40.78% and the weight % of oxygen was 6.54% (Fig.6d).

180 181 182

3.2. Effects of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs on bacterial biofilms CLSM analysis confirmed the inhibitory effects of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs on the biofilm

183

formation ability of both gram-positive E. faecalis and gram-negative P. aeruginosa. Both

184

bacteria produced well-ordered biofilms in the control group. Ss-βGBP-ZnONP-treated

185

groups showed the incompetent structure with separate bacterial cells. The biofilm formation

186

ability was considerably lower in the treatment groups than in the control group. The effect

187

was stronger with 100 µg/mL than that with 50 µg/mL Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs (Fig.7).

188 189 190

3.3. Bacterial viability assay The effects of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs on bacterial cells were assessed with CLSM using the

191

live/dead BacLight bacterial viability kit. The green and red fluorescence corresponded to

192

live and dead bacterial cells, respectively. The bacterial cells treated with 50 and 100 µg/mL

193

Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs for 60 min were found to be dead (Fig.8). The red fluorescence signal was

194

higher after treatment with 100 µg/mL Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs than that observed following

195

treatment with 50 µg/mL Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs.

196 197 198

3.4. Anticancer activity The cytotoxicity study revealed no morphological alterations in MCF7 cells from the

199

control group. However, the growth of Ss-βGBP-ZnONP-treated cells was affected at a

200

concentration of 25 µg/mL. MCF7 cells treated with 50 µg/mL Ss-βGBP-ZnONP were

201

ruptured (Fig. 9). The cytotoxicity of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs against MCF7 breast cancer cells

202

was higher at 75 µg/mL concentration than at 25 and 50 µg/mL (Fig. 10).

203 204

4. Discussion

205

Zinc plays an important role in metabolism and protein synthesis. Biological synthesis of

206

NPs in combination with immune molecules may reduce toxicity. In the present study,

207

ZnONPs were synthesized with the purified form of β-GBP from S. serrata (Ss-βGBP-

208

ZnONPs). The synthesized Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs were confirmed to have a molecular mass of

209

100 kDa. The purified form of βGBP from S. serrata has been previously described [26]. Ss-

210

βGBP-ZnONPs were characterized with UV-vis spectroscopy; the spectrum exhibited

211

absorption peaks at 350 nm, consistent with the results of Anjugam et al. [32] for ZnONPs

212

coated with β-GBP (Portunus pelagicus). Chaudhuri et al. [33] showed that ZnONPs obtained

213

from the leaf extract of Calotropis gigantean exhibited an absorption peak near 350 nm.

214

These results confirm the synthesis of ZnNPs. The present findings demonstrate the

215

crystalline nature of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs; FTIR spectrum reveals the strong and weak bands

216

associated with the presence of amide, alcohol, alkane, alkyl halide, and alkene groups. The

217

stretching vibration reveals the presence of functional groups in ZnONPs. As reported by

218

Anjugam et al. [32], the FTIR spectrum of Ppβ-GBP-ZnONPs showed a peak at 3221 cm−1

219

corresponding to the N-H stretching vibrations of amide groups of the protein. The band at

220

1062 cm−1 was related to the presence of amine groups.

221

Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs had a zeta potential value of −5.36 mV. This elevated negative value

222

confirms the stability of these NPs. Moreover, previous reports on the biosynthesis of

223

ZnONPs from the leaf extract of Calotropis gigantean revealed a zeta potential value of −20.7

224

mV [34]. Gelatin-coated ZnONP also showed a zeta value of −6 mV, indicative of the surface

225

charge of ZnONPs [35]. TEM images showed the nanocone structure of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs

226

and a standard particle size of 50 nm. This observation is in line with that reported by Kavitha

227

et al. [30], wherein a ZnO nanopowder was found to exhibit a cone shape and an uneven

228

surface. The calcification at 550 °C allows customization of the morphology to nanocones.

229

TEM images of ZnO nanocrystal illustrated the individual cone-shaped structure with an

230

average size of 70 nm [31]. Thus, the synthesized ZnO had a cone structure owing to thermal

231

oxidation.

232

Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs at 100 µg/mL concentration suppressed the bacterial biofilm formation

233

ability. Similar results were reported with Ppβ-GBP-ZnONPs at a concentration of 50 µg/mL

234

[32]. Ishwarya et al. [34] found that the plasma of fish fed with Phβ-GBP-SeNWs could

235

prevent the growth of bacterial colonies and suppress biofilm formation. Anjugam et al. [32]

236

demonstrated the effective anticancer activity of Ppβ-GBP-AgNPs against HeLa cells (50

237

µg/mL). Wahab et al. [21] used a very low concentration of NPs against MCF-7 cancer cells.

238

In the present study, Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs suppressed the viability of MCF7 cells at 75 µg/mL.

239 240 241

5. Conclusion Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs were synthesized and characterized with UV, XRD, FTIR, zeta

242

potential, and TEM. Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs effectively inhibited the biofilm formation ability of

243

gram-positive E. faecalis and gram-negative P. aeruginosa at 100 µg/mL concentration. The

244

bacterial viability of the same tested bacteria was suppressed at 100 µg/mL concentration. The

245

dropping ability of the bacterial biofilm could uplift all fields of research as in valuable. The

246

proliferation of MCF7 breast cancer cells was reduced after treatment with Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs

247

at 75 µg/mL. The particular property of this Ss- βGBP-ZnONPs without difficulty can be

248

elucidate into an effectual therapeutic for cancer therapy without causing dangerous effect to

249

ordinary tissues. Thus, Ss- βGBP-ZnONPs have the ability to inhibit the pathogenic bacteria

250

as well as to control the proliferation of MCF7 breast cancer cells. It provely Ss- βGBP-

251

ZnONPs used as a nanotheraputic agent in feature.

252 253

Conflict of interest

254

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

255 256

Acknowledgements

257

The authors extend their appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number

258

(RSP-2019/70), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. This work was funded by

259

RUSA phase 2.0 grant (ref-24 – 51/2014 – U, Policy) TN. Multi-Gen, Depart of Edn, Govt.

260

of

261

Technology, NGO Colony road, Nagarcoil, Tamil Nadu, India.

India.

The authors also thank to Fundation of Innovative research in Science and

262 263

References

264

[1]

G. Benelli, M. Govindarajan, Green-synthesized mosquito oviposition attractants and

265

ovicides: Towards a nanoparticle-based “Lure and kill” approach? J. Cluster Sci. 28

266

(2017) 287-308.

267

[2]

M. Govindarajan, G. Benelli, One-pot green synthesis of silver nanocrystals using

268

Hymenodictyon orixense: A cheap and effective tool against malaria, chikungunya and

269

Japanese encephalitis mosquito vectors? RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 59021-9.

270

[3]

M. Govindarajan, S.L. Hoti, M. Rajeswary, G. Benelli, One-step synthesis of

271

polydispersed silver nanocrystals using Malva sylvestris: an eco-friendly mosquito

272

larvicide with negligible impact on non-target aquatic organisms, Parasitol. Res. 115

273

(2016) 2685-2695.

274

[4]

K. Veerakumar, M. Govindarajan, M. Rajeswary, U. Muthukumaran, Mosquito

275

larvicidal properties of silver nanoparticles synthesized using Heliotropium indicum

276

(Boraginaceae) against Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi, and Culex quinquefasciatus

277

(Diptera: Culicidae), Parasitol. Res. 113 (2014) 2363-2373.

278

[5]

M. Govindarajan, M. Rajeswary, S.L. Hoti, K. Murugan, K. Kovendan, S. Arivoli, G.

279

Benelli, Clerodendrum chinense-mediated biofabrication of silver nanoparticles:

280

Mosquitocidal potential and acute toxicity against non-target aquatic organisms, J. Asia-

281

Pac. Entomol. 19 (2016) 51-58.

282

[6]

M. Govindarajan, G. Benelli, A facile one-pot synthesis of eco-friendly nanoparticles

283

using Carissa carandas: Ovicidal and larvicidal potential on malaria, dengue and

284

filariasis mosquito vectors, J. Cluster Sci. 28 (2017) 15-36.

285

[7]

P. Suganya, B. Vaseeharan, S. Vijayakumar, B. Balan, M. Govindarajan, N.S. Alharbi,

286

S. Kadaikunnan, J.M. Khaled, G. Benelli, Biopolymer zein-coated gold nanoparticles:

287

Synthesis, antibacterial potential, toxicity and histopathological effects against the Zika

288

virus vector Aedes aegypti, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2017;173:404-411.

289

[8]

V. Karthika, A. Arumugam, K. Gopinath, P. Kaleeswarran, M. Govindarajan, N.S.

290

Alharbi, S. Kadaikunnan, J.M. Khaled, G. Benelli, Guazuma ulmifolia bark-synthesized

291

Ag, Au and Ag/Au alloy nanoparticles: Photocatalytic potential, DNA/protein

292

interactions, anticancer activity and toxicity against 14 species of microbial pathogens,

293

J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 167 (2017) 189-199.

294

[9]

M. Abinaya, B. Vaseeharan, M. Divya, A. Sharmili, M. Govindarajan, N.S. Alharbi, S.

295

Kadaikunnan, J.M. Khaled, G. Benelli, Bacterial exopolysaccharide (EPS)-coated ZnO

296

nanoparticles showed high antibiofilm activity and larvicidal toxicity against malaria

297

and Zika virus vectors, J. Trace. Elem. Med. Biol. 45 (2018) 93-103.

298

[10] C. Balalakshmi, K. Gopinath, M. Govindarajan, R. Lokesh, A. Arumugam, N.S.

299

Alharbi, S. Kadaikunnan, J.M. Khaled, G. Benelli, Green synthesis of gold

300

nanoparticles using a cheap Sphaeranthus indicus extract: Impact on plant cells and the

301

aquatic crustacean Artemia nauplii, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 173 (2017) 598-

302

605.

303

[11] Q. Chaudhry, M. Scotter, J. Blackburn, B. Ross, A. Boxall, L. Castle, R. Aitken, R.

304

Watkins, Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector, Food

305

Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 25 (2008) 241-258.

306

[12] S. Ji, C. Ye, Synthesis, growth mechanism and applications of zinc oxide nanomaterials,

307 308

J. Mater. Sci Technol. 24 (2008) 457-472. [13] L. Prashanth, K.K. Kattapagari, R.T. Chitturi, V.R. Baddam, L.K. Prasad, A review on

309

role of essential trace elements in health and disease, J. NTR Univ. Health Sci. 4 (2015)

310

75.

311 312 313

[14] J. Jiang, J. Pi, J. Cai, The advancing of zinc oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications, Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2018 (2018) 1-18. [15] K.P. Maremanda, S. Khan, G. Jena, Zinc protects cyclo phosphamide induced testicular

314

damage in rat: involvement of metallothionein, tesmin and Nrf2, Biochem. Biophys.

315

Res. Commun. 445 (2014) 591-596.

316

[16] N. Jain, A. Bhargava, J.C. Tarafdar, S.K. Singh, J. Panwar, A biomimetic approach

317

towards synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97 (2013)

318

859-869.

319

[17] S.R. Saptarshi, A. Duschl, A.L. Lopata, Interaction of nanoparticles with proteins:

320

relation to bio-reactivity of the nanoparticle, J. Nanobiotechnol. 11 (2013) 26.

321

[18] K. Kavitha, M. Paulpandi, T. Ponraj, K. Murugan, S. Sumathi, Induction of intrinsic

322

apoptotic pathway in human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells through facile biosynthesized

323

zinc oxide nanorods, Karbala. Int. J. Mod. Sci. 2 (2016) 46-55.

324 325 326

[19] S.H. Hassanpour, M. Dehghani, Review of cancer from perspective of molecular. J. Cancer Res. Prac. 4 (2017) 127-129. [20] A. Roshini, S. Jagadeesan, Y.J. Cho, J.H. Lim, K H. Choi, Synthesis and evaluation of

327

the cytotoxic and anti-proliferative properties of ZnO quantum dots against MCF-7 and

328

MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer Cells, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 81

329

(2017) 551-560.

330

[21] R. Wahab, MA. Siddiqui, Q. Saquib, S. Dwivedi, J. Ahmad, J. Musarrat, A.A. Al-

331

Khedhairy, H.S. Shin, ZnO nanoparticles induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in

332

HepG2 and MCF-7 cancer cells and their antibacterial activity, Colloids Surf. B

333

Biointerfaces. 117 (2014) 267-276.

334

[22] S. Chakraborti, S. Chakraborty, S. Saha, A. Manna, S. Banerjee, A. Adhikary, S.

335

Sarwar, T.K. Hazra, T. Das, P. Chakrabarti, PEG-functionalized zinc oxide

336

nanoparticles induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells through reactive oxygen species-

337

dependent impairment of DNA damage repair enzyme NEIL2, Free Radic. Biol. Med.

338

103 (2017) 35-47.

339 340

[23] C. Dwivedi, A. Ghazaleh, Chemo preventive effects of sandalwood oil on skin papillomas in mice, Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 6 (1997) 399-401.

341

[24] P. Patra, S. Mitra, A.D. Gupta, S. Pradhan, S. Bhattacharya, M. Ahir, S. Mukherjee, S.

342

Sarkar, S. Roy, S. Chattopadhyay, A. Adhikary, A. Goswami, D. Chattopadhyay,

343

Simple synthesis of biocompatible biotinylated porous hexagonal ZnO nanodisc for

344

targeted doxorubicin delivery against breast cancer cell:In vitro and in vivo cytotoxic

345

potential, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 133 (2015) 88-98.

346

[25] B. Duvic, K. Soderhall, Purification and characterization of a β-1,3-glucan binding

347

protein from plasma of the crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus, J. Biol. Chem. 5 (1990)

348

9327-9332.

349

[26] M. Divya, B. Vaseeharan, M. Anjugam, A. Iswarya, S. Karthikeyan, P. Velusamy, M.

350

Govindarajan, N.S. Alharbi, S. Kadaikunnan, J.M. Khaled, C. Vágvölgyi,

351

Phenoloxidase activation, antimicrobial, and antibiofilm properties of β-glucan binding

352

protein from Scylla serrata crab hemolymph, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 114 (2018) 864-

353

873.

354

[27] J. Sivakamavalli, B.Vaseeharan, Bifunctional role of a pattern recognition molecule β-1,

355

3-glucan-binding protein purified from mangrove crab Episesarma tetragonum, J.

356

Invertebr. Pathol. 119 (2014) 25-31.

357

[28] P. Velusamy, J. Das, R. Pachaiappan, B. Vaseeharan, K. Pandian, Greener approach for

358

synthesis of antibacterial silver nanoparticles using aqueous solution of neem gum

359

(Azadirachta indica L.), Ind. Crop. Prod. 66 (2015) 103-109.

360

[29] F. Shaheen, M.H. Aziz, M. Fatima, M.A. Khan, F. Ahmed, R. Ahmad, M.A. Ahmad, T.

361

S. Alkhuraiji, M.W. Akram, R. Raza, S.M. Ali, In Vitro Cytotoxicity and

362

Morphological Assessments of GO-ZnO against the MCF-7 Cells: Determination of

363

Singlet Oxygen by Chemical Trapping, Nanomaterials (Basel). 539 (2018) pii: E539.

364

[30] M.K. Kavitha, H. John, P. Gopinath, Polyvinyl pyrrolidone assisted low temperature

365

synthesis of ZnO nanocones and its linear and nonlinear optical studies, Mat. Res. Bull.

366

49 (2014) 132-137.

367

[31] J. Joo, S.G. kwon, J.H. Yu, T. Hyeon, Synthesis of ZnO nanocrystals with cone,

368

hexagonal cone, and rod shapes via Non hydrolytic ester elimination sol-gel reactions,

369

Adv. Mater. 17 (2005) 1873 -1877.

370

[32] M. Anjugam, A. Iswarya, B. Vaseeharan, Multifunctional role of β-1, 3 glucan binding

371

protein purified from the haemocytes of blue swimmer crab Portunus pelagicus and

372

invitro antibacterial activity of its reaction product, Fish Shellfish Immunol. 48 (2016)

373

196-205.

374

[33] S.K. Chaudhuri, L. Malodia, Biosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using leaf extract

375

of Calotropis gigantea: characterization and its evaluation on tree seedling growth in

376

nursery stage, Appl. Nanosci. 7 (2017) 501-512.

377

[34] A. Iswarya, B. Vaseeharan, M. Anjugam, N. Gobi, M. Divya, C. Faggio, β-1, 3 glucan

378

binding protein based selenium nanowire enhances the immune status of Cyprinus

379

carpio and protection against Aeromonas hydrophila infection, Fish Shellfish Immunol.

380

83 (2018) 61-75.

381

[35] M. Divya, B. Vaseeharan, M. Abinaya, S. Vijayakumar, M. Govindarajan, N.S. Alharbi,

382

S. Kadaikunnan, J.M. Khaled, G. Benelli, Biopolymer gelatin-coated zinc oxide

383

nanoparticles showed high antibacterial, antibiofilm and anti-angiogenic activity, J.

384

Photochem. Photobiol. B. 178 (2018) 211-218.

Fig 1. SDS-PAGE analysis of purified Ss-βGBP and the synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticle (Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs). Lane-I, molecular marker; Lane-II, purified Ss-βGBP; Lane- III, SsβGBP-ZnONPs (100 kDa).

Fig 2. UV-Visible spectra of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs

Counts DSS

400

200

0 20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Position [°2Theta] (Copper (Cu))

Fig 3. X-ray diffraction outline shows the crystalline nature of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs

Fig 4. Fourier transform infrared spectra showing the functional group of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs

Fig 5. Zeta potential distribution for size and surface charge of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs

Fig 6. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs (a), single element of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs (b), selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (c), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) elemental work of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs (d).

Fig 7. Confocal laser scanning microscopy showing the inhibitory effect of Ss-βGBPZnONPs on E. faecalis and P. aeruginosa biofilms at two concentrations.

Fig 8. Live and dead cell assay with CLSM using pathogenic bacteria E. faecalis and P. aeruginosa after treatment with Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs at 50 and 100 µg/mL.

Fig 9. Morphology of MCF7 breast cancer cells after treatment with different concentrations of Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs under a phase-contrast microscope. Arrows point to the morphological changes in cells.

Fig 10. Effect of zinc, Ss-βGBP, and Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs on the viability of MCF7 cells as compared with the control group; T-bars designated typical errors; different letters on the top of bars indicate important distinctions with treatments (p < 0.05).

Highlights •

β-Glucan-binding protein-coated ZnONPs was synthesized from Scylla serrata



Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs was characterized with UV, XRD, FTIR, zeta potential, and TEM



Inhibition of biofilms by Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs was confirmed at 100 µg/mL



Ss-βGBP-ZnONPs at 75 µg/mL effectively inhibited MCF7 breast cancer cells