Pro& Nauro-Psychopharmocol. & Bwf. Psychiut. 1991, Vol. 15. pp. l-13 Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
027~5846/91 $0.00 + so IQ 1991 Pergamon Press plc
ANTIDEPRESSANT FOR SUBSTANCE-ABUSING SCHIZOPHRENIC PATIENTS: A MINIREVIEW SAMUEL G. SIRIS, PAUL C!. BERMANZOHN, SUSAN E. MASON AND MITCHELL A. SNUNALL Hillside Hospital Division of the Long Island Jewish Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, N.Y. U.S.A. (Final form, October 1990) Contents 2. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Abstract Introduction Antidepressant Medications in Schizophrenia Propensity for Substance Abuse Among Depressed Schizophrenic Patients Indications of Outcome When Antidepressants are used in SubstanceAbuse-Prone Schizophrenic Patients Conclusions Acknowledgements References
1 2 2 6 7 9 9 9
Abstract Siris, Samuel G., Paul C. Bermanzohn, Susan E. Mason and Mitchell A. Shuwall: Antidepressants for Substance-Abusing Schizophrenic Patients. A Minireview. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. & Biol. Psychiat. 1991, 13 (1): l-13. 1.
Substance abuse and post-psychotic depression are both frequently encountered concomitants of schizophrenia.
2.
Substance abuse may be associated with depression-like s~ptomatology in the course of schizophrenia, and patients may attempt to selfmedicate these symptoms with substances of abuse.
3.
Antidepressant medication has been found to be a useful adjunct to treatment in at least some cases of substance abuse and some cases of post-psychotic depression.
4.
Preliminary evidence exists suggesting that adjunctive antidepressant medication, added to a neuroleptic, may be useful for at least some stable dysphoric substance-abusing schizophrenic patients.
5.
It is important to attempt to rule out even subtle neuroleptic-induced akinesia in such patients with a vigorous trial of antiparkinsonian medication.
&e_ywords: antidepressant medication, depression, schizophrenia, substance abuse. &&eviations: analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), by mouth (PO), number (N), Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC), three times per day (TID).
S. G. Siris et al.
1.
Introduction
A body of evidence has begun to accumulate that antidepressant medications may prove
to be
an effective
component
of treatment
for at
least
some
subjects who suffer from substance abuse (Resnick and Resnick 1984: Gawin and Kleber 1986; Giannini et al. 1986; Kosten 1989; Pollack et al. 1989).
In
particular, these may be persons who suffer from dysphoria or an affective diathesis,
who
become
involved
in the
abuse
of psychostimulant
agents.
Simultaneously, reports have appeared indicating that there may be a role for the judicious use of adjunctive antidepressant medications in schizophrenia (Singh et al. 1978, Prusoff et al. 1979, Siris et al. 1987, Siris 1990). These
favorable
reports
have
dealt
with
relatively
stable,
neuroleptic-
maintained schizophrenic patients, who exhibit a depression-like
syndrome.
Such depression-like syndromes have been noted to occur not infrequently in schizophrenia - a modal estimate being that they may occur in 25% of cases (McGlashan and Carpenter 1976, Weissman et al. 1977, Falloon et al. 1978, Knights et al. 1979, Roy 1980, Johnson 1981, Mandel et al. 1982, Iiogarty and Munetz 1984, Martin et al. 1985).
Since substance abuse, particularly with
psychostimulant agents, has been observed to occur frequently among patients with schizophrenia (Breakey et al. 1974, McLellan and Druley 1977, Richard et al. 1985, Schneier and Siris 1987, Drake and Wallach 1989, Test et al. 1989)‘ and. since such abuse may predispose their psychoses
these patients to reexacerbations
of
(van Kammen et al. 1977, Gold and Bowers 1978, Angrist and
van Kammen 1984, Richard et al. 1985, Lieberman et al. 1987), a review of the literature relevant to the issue of the use of antidepressant medications in the treatment of substance-abusing schizophrenic patients is warranted. This review will consist of three parts: medications
in depressed
schizophrenic
1) the use of antidepressant
patients,
2) the propensity for substance abuse among depressed schizophrenic patients, and 3) indications
of outcome when adjunctive antidepressants are used in substance-abuse-prone schizophrenic patients. 2.
Fntidenressant Medications in Schizouhrenig
For many years, clinical wisdom dictated that antidepressant medications were
contraindicated
in schizophrenia.
This
impression
was
based
on a
limited series of trials, early in the history of psychopharmacology, which had either used antidepressant medications without a concomitant neuroleptic or
which
had
not
symptomatology. questionable
selected
schizophrenic
patients
with
depression-like
A number of early negative reports also either utilized
diagnostic
criteria
accounts which did not employ confident conclusion
by
modern
standards
or
were
suitable controls which would
(Siris et al. 1978).
anecdotal
allow
for a
Antidepressants
for schizophrenic
3
substance-abuse
recently, as shown in Table 1, there have been nine randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trials of adjunctive antidepressant medication added to the neuroleptic treatment of depressed-appearing schizophrenic patients (Siris 1990). All of these studies hava involved cyclic antidepressants. Appropriate studies involving MAO-inhibitor type antidepressants have not as yet been reported (Brenner and Shopsin 1980). Four of these cyclic antidepressant studies were positive, indicating that the antidepressant was helpful. The other 5 were negative, not finding utility to the adjunctive antidepressant. These seemingly contradictory studies differed in their methodology,however, so that it may be possible to begin to draw certain conclusions. More
Table 1 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-ControlledTrails of Adjunctive Antidepressants in "Post-PsychoticDepressedtg Schizophrenic Patients Studv
Neurolentic
Antidenressant
Result & Comment
Singh et al 1978
Continued on previous neuroleptic
Trazodone 300 mg/day
Some benefit
Prusoff et al 1979
Perphenazine
Amitriptyline 100-200 mg/day
Some benefit
Siris et al 1987
Fluphenazine decanoate
Imipramine 200 mg/day
Substantial benefit
Siris et al 1989a,1990
Fluphenazine decanoate
Maintenance Imipramine
Substantial benefit
Waehrens & Gerlach 1980
Continued on previous neuroleptic
Maprotiline 50-200 mg/day
No benefit
Johnson 1981
Fluphenazine decanoate Nortriptyline or flupenthixol decanoate I50 mg/day
No benefit
Kurland h Nagaraju 1981
Chlorpromazine or haloperidol
Viloxazine 300 mg/day
No benefit
Becker 1983
Chlorpromazine or thiothixene
Imipramine 150-250 mg/day
No benefit
Bupropion 150-750 mg/day
No benefit
Dufresne et al Thiothixene 1988
The first positive study was that of Singh et al. (1978). In that report, 60 chronic hospitalized patients who met Feighner criteria for schizophrenia (Feighneret al. 1972) and who had Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Hamilton 1960) scores of 18 or more were randomized to a 6-week trial of trazodone or placebo being added to their previous phenothiazine. This study found the
S. G. Sifis et al.
4
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores to be more reduced in the trazodone group, and the clinical global impression scale score also favored the trazodone-treated patients, although the rating changes on the Brief Psychiatric
Rating
Scale
(Overall
and
Gorham
1962)
did
not
achieve
statistical significance. Prusoff et al. (1979) described a study involving outpatients who met New Haven Index criteria
for schizophrenia
(Astrachan et al. 5972) and had a
score of at least 7 on the Raskin Depression Rating Scale 1970).
Amitriptyline
(Raskin et al.
(LLOO-200mg/day) or placebo was added to the patients'
perphenazine regimen (16-48 mg/day), and some patients were followed for as long as 6 months.
The authors found some decrease in depression ratings in
the amitriptyline-treated
group, although that group also had some increase
in thought disorder ratings.
The overall impression, however, was that the
effect of the addition of the amitriptyline was mildly positive, and that many patients benefitted somewhat, rather than just a few achieving great benefit. The most strongly positive Siris et al. (1987). Criteria
findings to have been reported are those of
In this trial, 33 patients who met Research Diagostic
(RDC) (Spitzer et al. 1978) for schizophrenia or schizoaffective
disorder at the time of their most recent flagrant psychotic episode, and who currently were either nonpsychotic or only residually psychotic but who met RDC for major or minor depression
in 'lcross-section,llwere maintained
on
fluphenazine decanoate end benztropine 2 mg po TID while they underwent a 6week trial of imipramine (200 mg/day) or placebo.
The imipramine group was
found to have a statistically superior outcome on the global outcome measure on each of 4 depression subscales. treatment groups
No difference was found between the two
in terms of measures
of psychosis
or side effects.
Of
interest is that this is the only study, of those which have been reported, which
made
an
operationalized
neuroleptic-induced
attempt
akinesia with
a trial
to
eliminate
the
confound
of antiparkinsonian
of
medication
(Rifkin et al. 1975, Van Putten and May 1978, Siris 1987). Patients responding favorably to imipramine in the above study were then included
in
the
double-blind
only
maintenance
study
of
adjunctive
antidepressant in depressed schizophrenic patients which has been reported in the literature (Siris et al. 1989a, Siris et al. 1990). decanoate
and
openly with
benztropine
adjunctive
treatment
imipramine
maintained,
for 6 months
With fluphenazine
patients before
were
continued
either having the
imipramine blindly maintained or tapered back to placebo for another year's treatment.
All of the 6 patients tapered to placebo relapsed into a depression-like state again, vs only 2 of the 8 who were maintained on active All relapsing patients then went on to respond imipramine (p = 0.009).
Antidepressantsfor schizophrenicsubstance-abuse
favorably once again when a tricyclic antidepressant was openly added. The first controlled double-blind of an antidepressant medication
study to
finding no benefit to the addition
depressed schizophrenic patients Was that
of Waehrens and Gerlach (1980). No specific diagnostic criteria were given, although the patients were clearly chronic and emotionally withdrawn. While continuing on their previous neuroleptic, these 17 patients showed no benefit to the addition of maprotiline (50-200 mg/day) in an S-week cross-over design trial.
In
this
the
study,
critique
can
be
raised
that
the
dose
of
maprotiline may have been too low, since in many cases it was lower than that which would be expected to be useful in primary depression. Sohnson (1981) studied 50 chronic schizophrenic patients having Feighner or Scheiderian symptoms, all of whom also had Beck DepreSSiOn (Beck et al. 1961) of 15 or more. fluphenazine decanoate double-blind antidepressant
trial was
InVentOry
SCOreS
While these patients were maintained on
or flupenthixol decanoate, they underwent a 5-week
of not
nortriptyline
150
found to alleviate
mg/day
or
depressive
placebo.
symptoms,
effects were found to be worse in the nortriptyline group.
This and side
One problem in
interpreting this study, however, is that the nortriptyline dose. may have been too high to have its maximum opportunity for efficacy. an antidepressant thought
of its plasma concentration would be expected
Nortriptyline is
to have a therapeutic "window@*of efficacy in terms (Glassman et al. 1985).
to carry many patients
A dose of 150 mg/day
above the upper
window, an effect which might be further exacerbated
limit of that
by the tendency of
concomitant neuroleptic to raise plasma tricyclic levels (Siris et al. 1982). Unfortunately, plasma nortriptyline levels were not obtained in this study, so that the therapeutic window hypothesis remains untested in this group. Kurland and Nagaraju (1981) studied 22 schizophrenic patients (no criteria given) who had Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores of 18 or more and who were being maintained on chlorpromazine or haloperidol.
Patients receiving
antiparkinsonian medications were specifically excluded.
A 4-week trial of
viloxazine (Up to 300 mg/day in the final week only) or placebo was administered, and the investigators found that both groups improved equivalently. It is Unclear whether this short a trial, built up to a full therapeutic dose in only the final week, constitutes an adequate test of the treatment. Becker (1983) compared the combination of chlorpromazine
(100-1200 mgfday
plus imipramine (150-250 mg/day) with thiothixene alone (5-60 mg/day) over 4 weeks of aCUtS treatment syndrome superimposed
in 52 patients meeting RDC for major depressive
on schizophrenia.
equally effective compared autonomic side effects in
with the
He found both treatments to be baseline, but found more sedative and chlorpromazine/imipramine treated group.
Interpretation of this study is difficult for our purposes, of course, due
6
S. G. Siris et ul.
the fact that different neuroleptics were used for the group which did versus the group which did not receive the antidepressant. Finally, the combination
of thiothixene
plus either bupropion
(150-750
mg/day) or placebo was tested over 4 weeks by Dufresne et al. (1988) among 38 patients
meeting
DSM-III
criteria
atypical affective disorder.
for
schizophrenia
with
superimposed
Both groups improved, although the placebo-
treated group appeared to improve more, and after the 4 weeks the majority of the bupropion-treated patients dropped out of what was scheduled to have been a longer
study.
In summary, although the results have been somewhat mixed, the studies with the
stronger
designs
have
seemed
to
show
at
least
some
evidence
of
improvement when adjunctive antidepressants are added to neuroleptic agents in the treatment of stable non-psychotic schizophrenic patients.
The same
may well not be true for schizophrenic patients who remain actively psychotic at the time of the trial. blind
study
which
has
In this case the one placebo-controlled, doublebeen
reported
showed
no
useful
improvement
in
depressive symptomatology with the addition of adjunctive antidepressant and a
tendency toward exacerbation of the psychotic state (Kramer et al 1989).
Another
important
secondary
issue
depression
induced akinesia,
is
the
differential
in schizophrenia
which
can
be
such
diagnosis
from the a close
which
syndrome
clinical
separates
of neurolepticphenocopy
of the
secondary depressed state (Rifkin et al. 1975, Van Putten and May 1978, Siris 1987). 3.
for Substance Abut2
prODenSitV
DeDressed SCweniC
Although the association of substance abuse with affective disorder and other
dysphoric
states
has
been
well
described
among
nonschizophrenic
patients (Resnick and Resnick 1984, Khantizian 1985, Gawin and Kleber 1986, Mirin and Weiss 1986), few investigations of this relationship exist among patients with schizophrenia.
This is all the more remarkable when one con-
siders the high prevalence of substance abuse which has come to be recognised among schizophrenic patients (Drake and Wallach 1989, Test et al. 1989) and the potential associated
for exacerbation
of psychosis with which such abuse may be
(Snyder 1973, Janowsky and Davis 1976, van Kammen et al. 1977,
Gold and Bowers 1978, Angrist and van Xammen
1984, Richard
et al. 1985,
Lieberman et al. 1987). One
line
schizophrenia
of
evidence
which
would
suggest
such
an
association
in
involves that choice of agents which schizophrenic patients
seem to choose to abuse.
By intuition, one might suspect that schizophrenic
individuals might choose to abuse compounds which are more sedative, since social withdrawal
is such
a common
feature of their disorder
and
since
Antidepressants
for schizophrenic
substance-abuse
7
circumstanceswhich arouse anxiety seem to bring them both discomfort and an Furthermore, there is increased risk of psychotic symptomatology. physiological reason to suppose that psychostimulantsmight directly tend to exacerbate psychosis by their effects on the biogenic amine neurotransmitter systems with which they interact. Nevertheless,the systematic observationhas been otherwise. Schizophrenic patients apparently tend to abuse psychostimulantsubstances preferentially. In a review of the relevant literature, the substances most consistently found to be abused by schizophrenic patients were amphetamine, cocaine, cannabis, and hallucinogens (Schneier & Siris 1987). In this same article, 4 out of the 5 studies reviewed found sedative hypnotics to be significantly less abused by schizophrenic patients than by other groups, with the fifth study showing no difference. This observation supports a self-medication hypothesis of drug abuse in schizophrenia, in which at least one driving force behind the substance abuse may be the individual's attempt to rid himself of unpleasant sensations such as dysphoria, anhedonia, or anergia. These experiences are the very ones which may be prominent aspects of secondary depression in schizophrenia, although anhedonia and anergia can also certainly be important aspects of the negative symptom state in schizophrenia (Crow 1980, Andreasen and Olsen 1982, Carpenter et al. 1985, Pogue-Geile and Zubin 1988), a state with which secondary depression can easily be confused (Siris et al. 1988a). One study was undertaken which specifically examined patients with the syndrome of secondary depression in schizophrenia for the existence of past histories of substance abuse (Siris et al. 198833). That study found a 35% occurrence of previous history of substance abuse among schizophrenic patients with syndromally documented episodes of post-psychotic depression. The most common substance of abuse in that study was cannabis. Tied for second as the most commonly abused substances, however, were two powerful psychostimulants:cocaine and amphetamine, each having been abused by 13% of the subjects studied. Much further down the list were sedatives and opiates, having been abused by only 4% and 2% of the study sample respectively. This study, therefore, is consistent with the psychostimulant self-medication hypothesis concerning substance abuse among dysphoric schizophrenicpatients. 4.
Indications of Outcome When Antidevresmts are Used in Substance-Abuse-ProneSchizoohranic Patients
It is noteworthy in the context of this review that a history of substance abuse did not adversely affect the responsiveness of a series of postpsychotic depressed schizophrenic patients to an adjunctive antidepressant which was added to their neuroleptic/antiparkinsoniandrug regimen (Siris et
S. G. Siris et 01
al. 1988b, Siris et al. 1989b).
In that series, 21 stabilized schizophrenic
or schizoaffective patients, with histories of substance abuse and current operationalized blindly
criteria
assigned
to
for post-psychotic
have
either
depression,
imipramine
or
fluphenazine decanoate and benztropine regimen.
were randomly and
placebo
added
to
their
The global outcome results,
which favored the imipramine-treated group, are shown in Table 2.
Although
the N in this study was relatively small, so that statistical significance was
difficult
to
achieve,
imipramine with statistical
one
of
4
depression
subscales
also
favored
significance and a second depression subscale
favored imipramine with trend-level significance.
Outcome change measures of
psychosis, however, did not differ meaningfully. Table 2 Results of a Double-Blind Trial of Adjunctive Imipramine Involving 21 Stabilized Post-Psychotic Depressed Schizophrenic or Schizoaffective Patients with Histories of Substance Abuse Imipramine-Treated Group (N=14) Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score (Guy 1976)
Placebo-Treated Group (N=7) a 3.43 + 0.79
2.53 & 0.52
a Results favor imipramine-treated group, t= -3.26, df = 19, p =: 0.004. The above-described
trial of adjunctive antidepressant
in post-psychotic
depressed schizophrenic patients with histories of substance abuse provides the clearest indication in the current literature that antidepressants may be of use in the treatment of relatively stable substance-abuse-prone dysphoric schizophrenic patients.
Furthermore, preliminary, more anecdotal indications
have begun to accumulate that adjunctive antidepressant medication may have a role in the treatment of dysphoric schizophrenic patients who have more recently, or who are currently abusing psychostimulant substances (Mason, S.E., personal communication). file), nine
current
or
In an as yet unpublished recent
substance-abusing
trial
(Siris, data on
dysphoric
schizophrenic
patients have been treated with adjunctiye imipramine (150-200 mg/day) added to their ongoing regimen of fluphenazine decanoate and benztropine. Four of these patients
were rated as being either "much improved" or "very much improved" following their g-week trial, although one of the remaining 5 patients needed to be rehospitalized for a reexacerbation of psychosis, which was subsequently controlled by an increase of neuroleptic medication.
BY way
9
Antidepressants forschizophrenic substance-abuse
of comparison, 3 of the patients in this series had had double-blind placebo In none of these placebo trials which preceded their imipramine treatment. trials were any of the patients considered to be either much or very much improved.
This
anecdotal
series,
conclusions to be based on it.
of course,
is far too
small
for any
It was nevertheless intriguing to note that
a preliminary ANCOVA analysis, covarying for baseline, of visual analogue scales assessing
cocaine
craving
favored the imipramine-treated
at the
end of the double-blind
trial,
group in terms of reduction of craving, as
shown in Table 3. Table 3 ANCOVA, Covarying for Baseline, of Visual Analogue Scale Ratings of Cocaine Craving for Substance-Abusing Post-Psychotic Depressed Schizophrenic and Schizoaffective Patients
Visual Analogue Scale Ratings
Imipramine Treated (N = 6)
Placebo Treated (N = 3)
a 11.4 + 8.8 (S.E.)
67.1 +
12.4
a Results favor imipramine-treated group, F = 13.5, P = 0.01. 5.
Conclusions
On the basis of the data here reviewed, it is fair to conclude that further assessments of the utility of adjunctive tricyclic antidepressant medication among
substance-abusing
dysphoric
schizophrenic
patients
is
warranted.
Preliminary observations suggest that the best candidates for those trials would be
those
individuals
whose
psychotic
diathesis
is under
at
least
moderately good control with neuroleptic medication, and in whom an attempt has been made to rule out the confound of (even subtle) neuroleptic-induced akinesia.
Acknowledsements This work was supported, in part, by grants #MB-34309 from the National Institute of Mental Health and #DA-O5039 from the National Institute of Drug Abuse. References ANDREASEN, N.C. and OLSEN S. (1982) Negative vs. positive schizophrenia:
S. G. Siris
10
Definition and validation.
et al
Arch. Gen. Psychiat. D:
789-794.
ANGRIST, B. and VAN KANNEN, D. P. (1984) CNS stimulants as tools in the study of schizophrenia. TINS 1: 388-390. ASTRACHAN, B.M., HARROW, M., ADLER, D., BRAUER, L., SCHWARTZ, A., SCHWARTZ, C. and TUCKER, G. (1972) A checklist for the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Br. J. Psychiat. m: 529-539. BECK, A.T., WARD, C.H., MENDELSON, H., MOCK, J.E. and ERBAUGH, J.K. (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 4: 561-571. BECKER, R.E. (1983) Implications of the efficacy of thiothixene and a chlorpromazine-imipramine combination for depression in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiat. ap: 1269-1275. BREAKEY, W-R., GOODELL, H., LORENZ, P.C. and MCHUGH, P.R. (1974) Hallucinogenic drugs as precipitants of schizophrenia. Psycholol. Med. Q: 255-261. BRENNER, R. and SHOPSIN, B. (1980) The use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiat. u: 633-647. CARPENTER, W.T. JR., HEINRICHS, D.W. and ALPHS, L.D. (1985) Treatment of negative symptoms. Schizophr. Bull. La: 440-452. CROW, T.J. (1980) Molecular pathology of schizophrenia: More than one disease process? Brit. Med. 3. 280: 66-68. DRAKE, R.E. and WALLACH, M.A. (1989) Substance abuse among the chronic mentally ill. Hosp. and Commun. Psychiat. &Q: 1041-1046. DUFRESNE, R.L., KASS, D.J. and BECKER, R.E. (1988) Bupropion and thiothixene versus placebo and thiothixene in the treatment of depression in schizophrenia. Drug Devel. Res. u: 259-266. FALLOON, I., WATT, D. C. and SHEPHERD, M. (1978) A comparative controlled trial of pimozide and fluphenazine decanoate in the continuation therapy of schizophrenia. Psychol. Med. 8: 59-70. FEIGHNER, J.P., ROBINS, E., GUZE, S.B., WOODRUFF, R.A., WINOKUR, G. and MUNOZ, R. (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. a: 57-63. GAWIN, F.H. and KLEBER, H.D. (1986) Pharamacological treatments of cocaine abuse. Psychiat. Clin. of N. Amer. 2: 573-583. GIANNINI, A.J., MALONE, D.A., GXANNINI, M.C., PRICE, W.A. and LOISELLE, R.H. (1986) Treatment of depression in chronic cocaine and phencyclidine abuse with desipramine. J. Clin. Phannacol. a: 211-214. GLASSMAN, A.H., SCHILDKRAUT, J.J., ORSULAK, P.J., COOPER, T.B., KUPFER, D.J., SHADER, R.I., DAVIS, J.M., CARROLL, B., PEREL, J.M., KLERMAN, G.L. and GREENBLATT, D.J. (1985) Tricyclic antidepressants - Blood level measurements and clinical outcome: An APA task force report. Am. J. Psychiat. M: 155-162. GOLD, M.S. and BOWERS, M.B. JR. (1978) Neurobiological vulnerability to lowdose amphetamine psychoses. Am. J. Psychiat. 135: 1546-1548. GUY, W. (1976) ECDEU Assessment Manual, CDHEW Publication No. 76-338. HANILTON, M. (1960) A rating scale for depression. Psychiatry 23: 56-62.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg.
HOGARTY, G.E. and MUNETZ, M.R. (1984) Phannacogenic depression among outpatient schizophrenic patients: A falilure to substantiate. J. Clin. Psychopharm. 4: 17-24. JANOWSKY, D.S. and DAVIS, J.M. (1976) Methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine, and levamphetamine: Effects on schizophrenic symptoms. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. u: 304-308.
Antidepressants
for schizophrenic
substance-abuse
11
JOHNSON, D.A.W. (1981) Studies of depressive symptoms in schizophrenia. 89-101. Brit. J. Psychiat. m: E.J. (1985) The self-medication hypothesis of addictive disorders: 1259-1264. Focus on heroin and cocaine dependence. Am. J. Psychiat. w:
KHANTZIAN,
KNIGHTS, A., OKASHA, M.S., SALIH, M.A. and HIRSCH, S.R. (1979) Depressive and extrapyramidal symptoms and clinical effects: A trial of fluphenazine versus flupenthixol in maintenance of schizophrenic out-patients. Brit. J. 515-523. Psychiat. 135: KOSTEN, T.R.. (1989) Pharmacotherapeutic interventions for cocaine abuse: Matching patients to treatments. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 177: 379-389. KRAMER, M.S., VOGEL, W.H., DIJOHNSON, C;, DEWEY, D.A., SHEVES, P., CAVICCHIA, S ., LITLE, P., SCHMIDT, R. and KIMES,I. (1989) Antidepressants in 'depressed' schizophrenic inpatients: A controlled trial. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. fi: 922-928. KURLAND, A.A. and NAGARAJU, A. (1981) Viloxazine and the depressed schizophrenic - Methodological issues. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 21: 37-41. LIEBERMAN, J.A., KANE, J.M. and ALVIR, J. (1987) Provocative tests with psychostimulant drugs in schizophrenia. Psychopharmacol. 91: 415-433. MANDEL, M.R., SEVERE, J.B., SCHOOLER, N.R., GELENBERG, A.J. and MIESKE, M. (1982) Development and prediction of postpsychotic depression in neuroleptic-treated schizophrenics. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. J9: 197-203. MARTIN, R.L., CMNINGER, R.C., GUZE, S.B. and CLAYTON, P.J. (1985) Frequency and differential diagnosis of depressive syndromes in schizophrenia. J. Clin. Psychiat. u: [ll,Sec. 21: 9-13. T-H. and CARPENTER, W.T. Jr. (1976) Postpsychotic depression in schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 11: 231-239.
MCGLASHAN,
MCLELLAN, A.T. and DRULEY, K.A. (1977) Non-random relation between drugs of abuse and psychiatric diagnosis. J. Psychiat. Res. n: 179-184. MIRIN, S.M. and,WEISS, R.D. (1986) Affective illness in substance abusers. Psychiatr. Clin. of N. Amer. 2: 503-514. OVERALL, J. and GORHAM, D. (1962) The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychol. Rep. u: 799-812. POGUE-GEILE, M.F. and ZUBIN, J. (1988) Negative symptomatology in schizophrenia: A conceptual and empirical review. Int. J. Ment. Health u: 3-45. POLLACK, M.H., BROTMAN, A.W. and ROSENBAUM, J.F. (1989) Cocaine abuse and abuse and treatment. Compr. Psychiat. 30: 31-44. PRUSOFF, B.A., WILLIAMS, D.H., WEISSMAN, M.M. and ASTRACHAN, B.M. (1979) Treatment of secondary depression in schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 36: 569-575. RASKIN, A., SCHUTERBRANDT, J.G., REATIG, N. and MCKEON, J.J. (1970) Differential response to chlorpromazine, imipramine and placebo. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 22: 164-173. RESNICK, R.B. and RESNICK, E.B. (1984) Cocaine abuse and its treatment. Psychiat. Clin. of N. Amer. 2: 713-728. RICHARD, M.L., LISKOW, B.I. and PERRY, P.J. (1985) Recent psychostimulant abuse in hospitalized schizophrenics. J. Clin. Psychiat. 46: 79-83. RIFKIN, A., QUITKIN, F. and KLEIN, D-F. (1975) Akinesia: A poorly recognized drug-induced extrapyramidal behavioral disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 2: 672-674. ROY, A. (1980) Depression in chronic paranoid schizophrenia. Brit. J. Psychiat. 137: 138-139. SCHNEIER, F.R. and SIRIS, S.G. (1987) A review of psychoactive substance use
12
S. G. Siris et al.
and abuse in schizophrenia: Patterns of drug choice. 175: 641-650.
J. Nerv. Ment. Dis.
SINGH, A.N., SAXENA, B. and NELSON, H.L. (1978) A controlled study of trazodone in chronic schizophrenic patients with pronounced depressive symptomatology. Curr. Ther. Res. 2: 485-501. SIRIS, S.G. (1987) Akinesia and post-psychotic depression: A difficult differential diagnosis. J. Clin. Psychiat. 98: 240-243. SIRIS, S.G. (1990) Pharmacological treatment of depression in schizophrenia. In: Depression in Schizophrenia, L. E. DeLisi (Ed.), pp 141-162, American Psychiatric Press, Washington, D.C. SIRIS, S.G., ADAN, F., COHEN, M., MANDELI, J., ARONSON, A. and CASEY, E. (1988a) Post-psychotic depression and negative symptoms: An investigation of syndromal overlap. Am. J. Psychiat. m: 1532-1537. SIRIS, S.G., BERMANZOHN, P.C., MASON, S.E., RIFKIN, A., ALVIR, J.M.J. and LANG, M.P. (1989b) Adjunctive imipramine for dysphoric schizophrenic patients with histories of substance abuse. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, Maui, Dec. 11, 1989. SIRIS, S.G., COOPER, T.B., RIFKIN, A.E., BRENNER, R. and LIEBERMAN, J.A. (1982) Plasma imipramine concentrations in patients receiving concomitant fluphenazine decanoate. Am. J. Psychiat. 139: 104-106. SIRIS, S.G., CUTLER, J., OWEN, K., MASON, S., GINGERICH, S. and LANG M.P. (1989a) Adjunctive imipramine maintenance in schizophrenic patients with remitted post-psychotic depressions. Am. J. Psychiat. M: 1495-1497. SIRIS, S.G., KANE, J.M., FRECHEN, K., SELLEW, A., MANDELI, J. and FASANODUBE, B. (1988b) Histories of substance abuse in patients with postpsychotic depressions. Compr. Psychiat. 29: 550-557. SIRIS, S.G., MASON, S.E., BERMANZOHN, P.C., MCCORRY, T.A. and ALVIR, J.M.J. (1990) Adjunctive imipramine maintenance in post-psychotic depression/ negative symptoms. Psychopharm. Bull. 26: 93-96. SIRIS, S.G., MORGAN, V., FAGERSTROM, R., RIFKIN, A. and COOPER, T.B. (1987) Adjunctive imipramine in the treatment of postpsychotic depression: A controlled trial. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 44: 533-539. SIRIS, S.G., VAN KAMMEN, D.P. and DOCHERTY, J.P. (1978) Use of antidepressant drugs in schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 35:
1368-1377.
SNYDER, S.H. (1973) Amphetamine psychosis: A '@model" schizophrenia mediated by catecholamines. Am. J. Psychiat. 130: 61-67. SPITZER, R.L., ENDICOTT, J, and ROBINS, E. (1978) Research Diagnostic Criteria: Rationale and reliability. Arch. Gen.- Psychiat. x: 773-782. TEST, M.A., WALLISCH, L.S., ALLNESS, D.J. and RIPP, K. (1989) Substance use in young adults with schizophrenic disorders. Schizophr. Bull. 15: 465475. VAN KAMMEN, D.P., BUNNEY, W.E. JR., DOCHERTY, J-P., JIMERSON, D.C., POST, R.M., SIRIS, S., EBERT, M. and GILLIN, J.C. (1977) Amphetamine-induced catacholamine activation in schizophrenia and depression: Behavioral and physiological effects. In: Advances in Biochemical Psychopharmacology, E. Costa and G.L. Gessa (Eds.), Vol. 16, pp. 655-659, Raven Press, New York. VAN PUTTEN, T. and MAY, P.R.A. (1978) 'Akinetic depression' in schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. s: 1101-1107. WAEHRENS, J. and GERLACH, J. (1980) Antidepressant drugs in anergic schizophrenia: Double-blind cross-over study with maprotiline and placebo. Acta Psychiat. Stand. a: 438-444.
Antidepressantsfar schizophrenicsubstance-abuse
WEISSMAN, M.N., AVENGER, I., KLEBER H., RUBEN, H.L., WILLIAMS, D. and in primary and secondary THOMPSON, W.D. (1977) Symptoms patterns depression: A comparison of primary depressives with depressed opiate 054addicts, alcoholics, and schizophrenics. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 2: 862. Inquiries and reprint requests should be addressed to: Samuel G. Siris, M.D. Hillside Hospital P.O. Box 38 Glen Oaks, New York 11004, U.S.A. (tel.) 718-470-8138
13