Antioxidant activities and functional properties of protein and peptide fractions isolated from salted herring brine

Antioxidant activities and functional properties of protein and peptide fractions isolated from salted herring brine

Accepted Manuscript Antioxidant Activities and Functional Properties of Protein and Peptide Frac‐ tions Isolated from Salted Herring Brine Ali Taheri,...

665KB Sizes 2 Downloads 110 Views

Accepted Manuscript Antioxidant Activities and Functional Properties of Protein and Peptide Frac‐ tions Isolated from Salted Herring Brine Ali Taheri, K.H. Sabeena Farvin, Charlotte Jacobsen, Caroline P. Baron PII: DOI: Reference:

S0308-8146(13)00890-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.06.113 FOCH 14321

To appear in:

Food Chemistry

Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date:

17 January 2013 3 June 2013 28 June 2013

Please cite this article as: Taheri, A., Sabeena Farvin, K.H., Jacobsen, C., Baron, C.P., Antioxidant Activities and Functional Properties of Protein and Peptide Fractions Isolated from Salted Herring Brine, Food Chemistry (2013), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.06.113

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1

Antioxidant Activities and Functional Properties of Protein and Peptide Fractions

2

Isolated from Salted Herring Brine.

3

Ali Taheri1, K. H. Sabeena Farvin2, Charlotte Jacobsen2,Caroline P. Baron2*

4 1

5 6 7

Department of Seafood Sciences, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Chabahar Maritime and Marine Sciences University,Chabahar, P.O. Box 99717-65499, Iran.

2

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark. B. 221, Søltofts Plads, DK-2800

8

Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.

9

___________________________________________________________________________

10

Running Head: Antioxidant activity of protein fractions from salted herring brine

11

*Corresponding author

12

C.P. Baron,

13

National Food Institute,

14

Technical University of Denmark,

15

B. 221, Søltofts Plads, DK-2800 Kgs, Lyngby,

16

Denmark.

17

Tel. + 45 45 25 49 19

18

Fax: + 45 45 88 47 74

19

Email: [email protected]

20 21

1

22

ABSTRACT

23

In the present study proteins isolated from herring brine, which is a by-product of marinated

24

herring production were evaluated for their functional properties and antioxidant activity.

25

Herring brine was collected from the local herring industry and proteins were precipitated by

26

adjusting the pH to 4.5 and the obtained supernatant was further fractionated by using

27

ultrafiltration membranes with molecular weight cut offs of 50, 10 and 1 kDa. The obtained

28

>50kDa, 50-10kDa, 10-1kDa fractions and pH precipitated fraction were studied for their

29

functional properties and antioxidant activity. Functional properties revealed that >50 kDa

30

polypeptides showed good emulsion activity index when compared to the other fractions.

31

However all fractions had low emulsion stability index. The pH precipitated fraction showed

32

the highest foaming capacity and stability at pH 10. The 50-10kDa and 10-1kDa peptide

33

fractions showed good radical scavenging activity and reducing power at a concentration of

34

0.5mg protein/ml. All the fractions demonstrated low iron chelating activity and did not

35

inhibit oxidation in a soybean phosphatidylcholine liposome model system. However all the

36

fractions were to some extent able to delay iron catalyzed lipid oxidation in 5% fish oil in

37

water emulsions and the 10-50kDa fraction was the best. These results show the potential of

38

proteins and peptide fractions recovered from waste water from the herring industry as source

39

of natural antioxidants for use in food products.

40 41

Keywords Herring brine, ultra filtration, peptides, antioxidant, functionality

42 43

2

44

Introduction

45

Lipid oxidation is of great concern to the food industry and consumers since it leads to the

46

development of undesirable off-flavours and potentially toxic reaction products (Frankel,

47

2005). One of the ways to limit this problem and increase the shelf life of food products is by

48

using antioxidants. Indeed, synthetic antioxidants such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA),

49

butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), t-butyl-hydroquinone and propyl gallate are often used in

50

the food industry. However, the use of synthetic antioxidants in food products is under strict

51

regulation because of their potential health hazards (Branen, 1975; Linderschmidt et al.

52

1986). Therefore, there is a growing interest to identify antioxidants from many natural

53

sources. In recent years, peptides have shown real potent antioxidative activities and could

54

further be investigated for potential use as food additives (Kudo et al, 2009; Zhuang et al,

55

2009; Xue et al, 2009). Moreover, peptides have received considerable attention, due to their

56

low molecular weight, easy absorption, and potential antioxidative, antihypertensive and

57

immune modulatory effects under physiological conditions (Grimble et al, 1987; Monchi and

58

Rerat, 1993; Byun et al. 2009). Antioxidant activity has been reported for protein

59

hydrolysates from various fish protein sources such as tuna cooking juice (Hsu et al. 2009),

60

herring press juice (Sannaveerappa et al. 2007), yellowfin sole frame (Jun et al. 2004), Alaska

61

Pollack frame (Je et al. 2005 ), hoki frame (Je et al. 2005), and pacific hake muscle

62

(Samaranayaka and Li-Chan, 2008).

63

Herring (Clupea harengus) is one of the most important fish species in the North

64

Atlantic and Baltic Sea (Zeller et al, 2011). Herring is known for its high content of long

65

chain omega-3 fatty acids EPA and DHA and hence its health beneficial effects (Aro et al,

66

2000). Pickling or marinating is a traditional way of processing herring in Scandinavian

67

countries and is a part of the traditional heritage. This process involves two steps, the first

68

step is salting of the herring in barrels and allowing to ripe for 6-12 months. During this

3

69

ripening period the herring develop a very characteristic texture and taste. Several

70

investigations have demonstrated that during ripening degradation and oxidation of protein

71

take place and this is believed to be some of the main factors involved in ripening of salted

72

herring (Andersen et al., 2007; Christensen et al. 2011). It has been shown that proteases

73

from the intestinal and the muscle tissue participate in proteolytic degradation of the muscle

74

proteins (Nielsen, 1995; Stefansson et al., 2000) which leads to an increase in soluble

75

nitrogenous compounds, such as peptides and amino acids (Nielsen 1995; Nielsen &

76

Børresen, 1997). The second step is removal of the brine and adding flavourings, typically

77

vinegar, salt and sugar solution to which ingredients like peppercorn, bay leaves and raw

78

onions are added. During this step a large quantity of brine is discarded as waste which is rich

79

in amino acids, peptides and proteins fragments. Therefore, efficient recovery and utilization

80

of this nutrient rich brine is an important concern for the herring industry in order to reduce

81

discharge of potentially environmental unfriendly effluents and to maximize economic

82

benefits.

83

The aims of the present study were (a) to isolate different peptide fractions from herring

84

brine by ultrafiltration (b) to evaluate the isolated fractions for antioxidant activities both in

85

simple antioxidant assay including DPPH radical scavenging, reducing power and Fe2+

86

chelating activity and in more complex systems containing lipids such as soybean

87

phosphatidyl choline liposomes and emulsified fish oil and finally (c) to test the functional

88

properties (emulsifying and foaming capacity) of the isolated fraction.

89 90

Material and methods

91

Samples and chemicals

92

Herring brine was obtained from the herring producer Lykkeberg A/S (Horve,

93

Denmark). After arrival to our laboratory the brine was divided into 800 mL buckets and 4

94

stored at -30°C until use. L- phosphatidyl choline, 1,1-diphenyl-2-pycryl-hydrazyl (DPPH),

95

thiobarbaturic acid (TBA), ascorbic acid, ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA), and

96

bovine serum albumin (BSA) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany).

97

Chloroform and methanol were of HPLC grade (Lab-Scan, Dublin, Ireland). Refined non-

98

deodorized fish oil without added antioxidants was donated by Maritex A/S (Sortland,

99

Norway), subsidiary of TINE BA. All chemicals were of analytical grade.

100 101

Isolation of peptide fractions from the brine

102

The protein and peptides in the brine were recovered by adjusting the pH to 4.5

103

followed by sequential ultrafiltration of the supernatant. The pH was chosen because pre-tests

104

(2
105

4.5 the brine was centrifuged (Sorvall RC 5B Plus, Dupont, Norwalk, CT, USA) at 30000 × g

106

for 20 min at 4°C. The precipitate was collected, freezed dried and stored at -80°C until

107

further analysis. The supernatant was placed on ice and filtered (Whatman number 4) to

108

remove lipids and other insoluble matter. Subsequently, the supernatant was subjected to

109

successive ultrafiltration (UF) steps using a stirred dead-end UF cell of 300 ml capacity

110

(Millipore A/S, Glostrup, Denmark) with molecular cut off sizes of 50, 10 and 1kDa (Diaflo

111

membranes, 76 mm diameter, Millipore Glostrup, Denmark) at 4oC with a nitrogen pressure

112

of 0.4 Mpa. To remove the salt in the sample, the retentates were washed 3 times with 50 ml

113

distilled water before the retentate fractions were collected (Figure 1). Thus three (retentate)

114

UF-fractions were obtained >50 kDa, 50-10 kDa and 10-1 kDa, and subsequently freeze dried

115

and stored at -80 °C until further analysis. The UF-fraction <1kDa was discarded as it

116

contains mainly salts. The protein content (mg/ml) of each fraction was assayed using the

117

BCATM kit (Thermo Sci., Pierce, Rockford, USA) and using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as

118

standard. The salt content of the fractions was measured by potentiometric titration of

5

119

chlorine ions using AgNO3 according to the AOAC standard method (AOAC 2000). Dry

120

matter content was measured by freeze drying the samples for 24 hour and weighting the

121

remaining materials.

122 123

LC–MS analysis of free amino acids and total amino acids

124

The precipitate and the obtained UF-fractions were analyzed for their free amino acids

125

and total amino acids according to the method described by Farvin et al. (2010). For free

126

amino acids, 500 mg of freeze-dried samples were added to 5 mL absolute ethanol to

127

precipitate all the proteins. The mixture was homogenised using a hand operated

128

homogeniser (Polytron, PT 1200CL, Kinematica AG, Switzerland) and was centrifuged

129

(Sigma 4k 15, Osterode am Harz, Germany) at 2800 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was

130

collected and the precipitate was re-extracted 3 times with the same quantity of ethanol. The

131

combined supernatants were evaporated to dryness under nitrogen. The residue was

132

redisolved in 1 mL 0.05 N HCl and were filtered through a membrane filter with 0.2 µm

133

pore size, and subsequently the amino acids were derivatized using the EZ: Fast kit from

134

Phenomenex A/S (Allerød, Denmark). Sample volumes of 2 μL were injected into the HPLC

135

mounted with the reversed phase column EZ: Fast AAA-MS (250 x 3.0 mm; Phenomenex

136

A/S Allerød, Denmark) and eluted at 35°C with a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The mobile phase

137

A consisted of water and B was methanol, both contained 10 mM ammonium formate. The

138

gradient consisted of linear increase from 60 to 83% B in 20 min, then the column was re-

139

equilibrated to 60% B until the end of the run (26 min). The eluate was transferred to the on-

140

line mass spectrometer (Agilent 1100, Agilent Technology, Waldbronn, Germany) where

141

amino acids were ionised using APCI with a chamber temperature of 450 °C, and mass

142

spectra were obtained by positive ion mode scanning from 100 to 600 m/z. The amino acids

143

were quantified based on peak areas of known concentrations of the amino acid standards. 6

144

For total amino acids, a sample of 50 mg of the precipitate and UF-fractions were

145

hydrolysed overnight in 2 mL 6 M HCl in sealed ampoules. The samples were appropriately

146

diluted and filtered through a 0.2 µm membrane filter before derivatization of amino acids

147

and analysis of amino acid content by LC-MS as described above.

148 149

Emulsifying properties.

150

Emulsifying properties of the precipitate and the different UF-fractions were compared

151

with those of sodium caseinate (standard) according to the method by Klompong et al.,

152

(2007). Thirty ml of 1% protein solution (300mg) was mixed with 10 mL of rapeseed oil and

153

the pH was adjusted to 7. For the pH precipitated fraction the emulsifying property was

154

determined at different pH (2, 4, 6, 8 and 10). The lipid/protein fraction mixtures were

155

homogenized at a speed of 14000 rpm for 1 min using a homogenizer (Polytron, PT 1200CL,

156

Kinematica AG, Switzerland). An aliquot of the emulsion (50 µl) was pipetted from the

157

bottom of the container at 0 and 10 min after homogenization and mixed with 5 ml of 0.1%

158

sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) solution. The absorbance of the diluted solution was

159

measured at 500 nm using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu spectrophotometer, UV mini

160

1240, Japon). The absorbance measured immediately (A0) and 10 min (A10) after emulsion

161

formation were used to calculate the emulsifying activity index (EAI) and the emulsion

162

stability index (ESI) according to Pearce & Kinsella, 1978.

163 164 165

EAI (m2/g) =

2x 2.303x A500 0.25 x protein weight (g)

166 167 168

ESI (min) = A0 x Δt/ ΔA Where ΔA = A0-A10 and Δt =10min 7

169 170

Foaming properties

171

Foaming capacity and stability of the precipitate was compared with BSA (standard)

172

according to the method of Tao and Sathe (2000). 250 mg of protein samples were mixed

173

with 250 ml of distilled water and the pH was adjusted to 2, 4, 6, 8 or 10. The mixture was

174

homogenized at a speed of 14000 rpm for 2 min using a homogenizer (Polytron, PT 1200CL,

175

Kinematica AG, Switzerland). The whipped sample was immediately transferred into a 300

176

ml cylinder and the total sample volume was read at 0 min and after 60 min. The foaming

177

capacity and foam stability was calculated according to the following equation.

178 179 180

Foaming capacity (%) = A0 - B x 100 B

181 182 183 184

Foam stability (%) = A60 - B x 100 B Where A0 is the volume immediately after whipping (ml) and

185

A60 is the volume after 60min of whipping (ml) and B is the volume before whipping (ml).

186 187

Evaluation of antioxidant activity of the peptide fractions

188

Scavenging of ,-diphenyl--picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical

189

DPPH free radical scavenging capacity of the precipitate and the different UF-fractions

190

was measured according to a modified method of Shimada et al. (1992). 1.5 ml of DPPH

191

solution (0.1 mM in 95% ethanol) was mixed with 1.5 ml of sample solution (0.1 and 0.5mg

192

protein/ml final concentration). The mixture was left for 30 min at room temperature and the

193

absorbance was measured at 517 nm using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV mini 1240,

194

Duisburg, Germany). As control, distilled water was used instead of the sample. BHT at a

8

195

concentration of 0.02 mg/ml was also used as a positive control for comparison. Radical

196

scavenging capacity was calculated as follows:

DPPH radical scavenging capacity %  = 1197 198

A517 sample ×100 A517 control

Chelation of metal ions (Fe2+)

199

Iron (II) chelating activity was evaluated by the method of Dinis, Madeira, &

200

Almeida (1994) with some modification. An aliquot of the precipitate and the Uf-fractions (at

201

a final concentration of 0.1 and 0.5 mg protein/ml) was made up to 3.7 ml with deionised

202

water. Subsequently, 2 mM ferrous chloride (0.1 ml) was added and after 3 min, the reaction

203

was inhibited by the addition of 5 mM ferrozine (0.2 ml). The mixture was shaken vigorously

204

and left at room temperature for 10 min. Absorbance of the resulting solution was measured

205

at 562 nm using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV mini 1240, Duisburg, Germany). A

206

control was made with distilled water instead of sample. EDTA (0.1 mg/ml) was used for

207

comparision and run in a similar manner. The chelating capacity was calculated as follows:

208

Fe2+Chelating activity %  =

Blank – Sample ×100 Blank

209 210

Reducing power

211

The reducing power was measured according to the method of Oyaizu (1986) with

212

some modification. 1 mL of UF-fractions (at a final concentration of 0.1 and 0.5 mg

213

protein/ml) was mixed with 1 ml of 0.2M phosphate buffer (pH 6.6) and 1 ml of potassium

214

ferricyanide. The mixture was incubated at 50°C for 20 min and 1 ml 10% TCA was added to

215

this mixture. An aliquot of 2 ml from this incubation mixture was mixed with 2 ml of distilled

216

water and 0.4 ml of 0.1% ferric chloride. After 10 min the absorbance of the resulting

217

solution was measured at 700 nm in a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV mini 1240,

218

Duisburg, Germany). Ascorbic acid (0.02 mg/ml) was used as positive control and used for 9

219

comparison. Increased absorbance (A700 nm) of the reaction mixture indicates increased

220

reducing power.

221 222

Inhibition of lipid peroxidation in a liposome model system

223

Liposomes were prepared from soybean phosphatidyl choline according to the method

224

described by Farvin et al, 2010. Lipid oxidation was performed in a model system containing

225

0.1 mg of phosphatidyl choline liposomes per ml of phosphate buffered Saline (PBS) (3.4

226

mM Na2HPO4 - NaH2PO4, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.0) and the UF-fractions were tested at a final

227

concentrations of 0.1 and 0.5 mg protein/mL. Lipid oxidation was initiated using

228

iron/ascorbate redox cycling using 50 M FeCl3 and 100 M ascorbate. The reactants were

229

mixed by vortexing for 2 seconds and incubated at 37 oC in a water bath for 1 h. The

230

liposome assay solution incubated with distilled water instead of the sample was used as

231

control. Lipid oxidation was measured by determining the concentrations of thiobarbituric

232

acid reactive substance (TBARS) formed according to the method of Buege and Aust (1978).

233

The amount of TBA-reactive substances expressed as MDA released per mg phospholipid

234

(PL) was calculated using the molar extinction coefficient of MDA as 1.56 x 105.

235

Antioxidant activity of peptide fractions in 5% fish oil-in-water emulsion

236

5 % oil in water emulsion was prepared with 1% citrem as emulsifier. In brief: 5 g of

237

citrem and 25 g fish oil were weighed into a glass beaker and mixed together by magnetic

238

stirrer. 470 ml of buffer (Imidazole-Acetate, 10mM, pH 7) was measured into a one litre

239

beaker and the precipitate and UF- fractions at a concentration of 1g/ml were dissolved into

240

the buffer. A pre-homogenisation was done for 3 min using an ultra turrax (T1500, Ystral,

241

Dottingen, Germany) by adding the oil/citrem mix slowly over 1 min and further mixing for 2

242

min. After the pre-homogenisation step the emulsion was prepared by a high pressure 10

243

homogenizer (Total pressure of 800 bar, Panda 2K Homogeniser from Niro Soavi S.p.A,

244

Parma, Italy). A control without antioxidant and an emulsion with 0.2g/ml of BHT were also

245

made for comparison. Subsequently, 400 ml of the emulsions was poured into 500 ml sterile

246

blue capped bottles in duplicate and FeSO4 solution (100 μM) was added in order to induce

247

oxidation. Bottles were kept on a magnetic stirring plate at 20 °C for 48h in the dark. The

248

sampling was done from the same bottle after 0, 12, 24 and 48 hours. The samples for

249

chemical analysis were transferred to separate brown glass bottles, flushed with nitrogen and

250

stored at -80 oC until analyses. Peroxide value (PV), Anisidine value (AV) and loss of

251

tocopherols was used to assess antioxidant activity.

252 253

Analysis of Peroxide Value (PV) and Anisidine Value (AV)

254

Lipids from the emulsions were extracted by chloroform: methanol (1:1 v/v) as

255

described by Bligh, & Dyer (1959). PV was measured directly on the Bligh and Dyer extract

256

according to the method described by the international IDF standards (1991). Anisidine value

257

was measured directly of the on the Bligh and Dyer extract according to the method of AOCS

258

(1994).

259 260

Determination of tocopherol content

261

Tocopherol content in the fish oil emulsion was determined using an Agilent 1100

262

series HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA), equipped with a fluorescence

263

detector. About 2 g of the chloroform extract from the Bligh and Dyer were evaporated under

264

nitrogen and redissolved in 2 ml of n-heptane and an aliquot (40 µL) was injected onto a

265

Spherisorb s5w column (250 mm 9 4.6 mm) (Phase Separation Ltd, Deeside, UK). Elution

266

was performed with an isocratic mixture of n-heptane/2-propanol(100: 0.4; v/v) at a flow of 1 11

267

ml/min. Detection was done using a fluorescence detector with excitation at 290 nm and

268

emission at 330 nm and according to AOCS (1994). Results were expressed in μg tocopherol

269

per g of lipid.

270 271

Statistical Analysis

272

All results are given as mean values of triplicates with indication of standard

273

deviation unless otherwise stated. The results were analysed using two-way analysis of

274

variance and followed by tukey and Bonferroni post test using Graphpad prism 5 (Graphpad

275

Softwarer Inc., San Diego, USA) and with a level of significance of at least p<0,05.

276 277

Results and Discussions

278

Composition of fractions

279

The protein, salt content and dry matter of the herring brine was 49.2± 2.2 mg/ml and

280

20.7±0.6% and 23.78± 0.2% respectively. The protein, salt and dry matter content of the

281

different fractionations is given in Table 1. The precipitate collected after pH adjustment and

282

fractions >50kDa, 50-10 kDa, 10-1 kDa showed lower salt content when compared to the

283

herring brine. The salt content of the <1kDa fraction was 23.5%, which also illustrates that

284

the washing procedure of the retentate was successful in reducing the salt content of the

285

fractions. The <1 kDa fraction which contained mostly salt was discarded.

286 287

Emulsifying and foaming properties

288 289

Emulsion activity index (EAI) measures the area of oil–water interface stabilized by a unit

290

weight of protein (Wu et al, 1998). Higher indices represent smaller number of dispersed fat

291

droplets. It also represents the ability of polypeptides for being adsorbed at the oil water 12

292

interface (Pacheco Aguilar et al 2008). The EAI values for the different fractions at pH 7 are

293

given in Figure 2a. EAI of >50 kDa fraction was markedly higher than the other fractions;

294

followed by the pH precipitated fraction. The EIA of 50-10kDa and 10-1kDa fractions

295

showed significantly lower EAI compared to the other fractions. However none of the

296

fractions were as effective as sodium caseinate. The 50-10kDa and 10-1kDa fractions mainly

297

consist of short peptides and free amino acids. Thus, there was a clear indirect correlation

298

between EAI and the free amino acid content of these fractions. A direct relationship between

299

surface activity and peptide length has previously been reported (Souissi et al 2007). The

300

smaller peptides often have reduced emulsifying properties.

301 302

Emulsion stability index (ESI) measures an emulsion’s ability to resist breakdown (Wu et al,

303

1998). Higher ESI values indicate more stable emulsions. ESI of the different fractions at pH

304

7 is shown in Figure 2b. The ESI value for the different fractions ranged between 1 and 2

305

min, which was significantly (p<0.05) lower when compared to sodium caseinate, which had

306

an ESI of 41.8 min. This may be due to the low molecular weight peptides present in the

307

herring brine. It has been reported that a higher content of larger molecular weight peptides or

308

more hydrophobic peptides contribute to the stability of the emulsion (Mutilangi et al 1996).

309

Small peptides and amino acids are less efficient in reducing the interfacial tension due to

310

lack of unfolding and reorientation at the interface as the large peptides do (Gbogouri et al

311

2004). Several studies have reported that emulsion stability is reduced with decreasing size of

312

peptides (Gbogouri et al 2004, Klompong et al 2007, Kristinsson and Rasco 2000).

313

Emulsion activity index and emulsion stability index of the pH precipitated fraction at

314

different pH values were also measured because this fraction was available in sufficient

315

quantity, whereas this was not the case for the other UF fractions (Fig 2 a & b ). There was no

316

significant difference in the EAI of the pH precipitated fraction at different pH values.

13

317

However, it was significantly lower than that of sodium caseinate (p<0.001) at all pH values

318

except at pH 4 where there was no significant (p< 0.05) difference between the two.

319

Maximum EAI was at pH 2 (100.8 ± 2.16 m2/g protein) and minimum was at pH 6 (85.98±

320

0.9 m2/g protein). ESI of this fraction at different pH showed a maximum stability at pH 2.

321

Then there was a drastic reduction in ESI as the pH increased. Maximum stability was 60.74±

322

21.1 min at pH 2 and minimum was 0.46± 0.13 min at pH 6. In the case of sodium caseinate

323

the maximum emulsion stability was observed at pH 2, 8 and 10 and the ESI was lowest at

324

pH 4. A similar trend was observed in the foaming properties for this fraction at different pH

325

values. The pH precipitated fraction showed maximum foaming capacity (92.5 ± 3.5%) at pH

326

10 and minimum (40.0 ± 7.0%) at pH 6. The foam stability showed also a maximum at pH

327

10 (32.5 ± 3.5%) and a minimum at pH 6 (17.5 ± 3.5%). BSA showed the lowest foaming

328

capacity and foam stability at pH 4. Sodium caseinate and BSA having isolelectric point at

329

pH 4.6-4.7 showed a decrease in emulsifying and foaming properties when pH was near to

330

their isolelectric pH. When pH moves away from the isoelectric point, the net charge of the

331

protein molecules increase, which weakens the hydrophobic interactions and increases

332

protein flexibity. This enhances their emulsifying and foaming properties (Lawal et al 2007).

333

The functional properties such as emulsification and foaming are affected by the solubility of

334

proteins (Wilding and Lilliford 1984). At or near to the isoelectric point the solubility of

335

proteins is decreased, and this may be another reason for the lower value for functional

336

properties near the isoelectric point (pH 6).

337 338

In vitro antioxidant activity of the isolated fractions

339 340

The free radical scavenging capacity of the precipitate and the UF- fractions were tested by

341

their ability to scavenge the stable DPPH radical. In radical form DPPH gives strong

14

342

absorption band at 517 nm and as the electron becomes paired off in the presence of a free

343

radical scavenger, the absorption vanishes (Desai, Wadekar, Kedar & Patil, 2008). The DPPH

344

radical scavenging activity showed a concentration dependency and increased with increasing

345

protein concentration (Table 4). At 0.1mg /ml concentration there was no significant

346

difference between the fractions except for 10-1kDa fraction which showed significantly (p<

347

0.05) higher radical scavenging activity when compared to other fractions. Also at 0.5mg /ml

348

the low molecular weight fraction 10-1k Da showed highest DPPH radical scavenging

349

activity followed by 50-10kDa fraction. There was no significant difference between radical

350

scavenging activity of >50kDa fraction and the pH precipitated fraction. However, none of

351

the fractions were as effective as BHT, which showed 79.8 % activity at a concentration of

352

0.2mg/ml. The result of our study is in accordance with some of the earlier studies. Indeed,

353

Peng et al, (2009) reported that the DPPH radical scavenging activity of 0.1-2.8 kDa fraction

354

of whey protein hydrolysate was higher than >40KDa, 2.8–40KDa and <0.1kDa fractions. A

355

study on the antioxidant activity of different fractions of yoghurt peptides by Farvin et al

356

(2010) also showed highest DPPH radical activity in the 3-10kDa and <3kDa fractions. Yang

357

et al, 2008 showed that the 3kDa fraction from protein hydrolysates of cobia skin showed the

358

highest DPPH radical scavenging activity. The results of the present study reveal that the

359

herring brine possibly contained peptides/amino acids, which acts as electron donors or could

360

react with free radicals to convert them to more stable products and terminate the free radical

361

chain reaction.

362 363

It has been recognized that transition metal ions, such as Fe2+ and Cu2+ are involved in

364

many oxidation reactions in vivo by catalyzing the generation of reactive oxygen species such

365

as hydroxyl radical and superoxide anion (Stohs, & Bagachi, 1995). Hydroxyl radicals react

366

rapidly with the adjacent biomolecules and induce severe damage. Therefore, the chelation of

15

367

metal ions also indirectly contributes to some antioxidant activity. The Fe2+ chelating activity

368

of the different fractions was negligible when compared to the chelating activity of EDTA at

369

0.2mg/ml concentration (Table 4). In addition, increasing protein concentration from 0.1

370

mg/ml to 0.5 mg/ml did not affect the metal chelating activities of the fractions. The lower

371

molecular fraction 10-1kDa seemed to be the best metal chelator, however it was still

372

inefficient compared to EDTA. Some studies have reported good metal chelating activities of

373

low molecular weight protein fractions, and increase metal chelating activity with increasing

374

degree of hydrolysis, which was not the case in our study (Klompong et al. 2007; Farvin et al.

375

2010).

376

The reducing power assay is often used to evaluate the ability of natural antioxidants to

377

donate electrons or hydrogen (Dorman et al. 2003). We used the ferric reducing antioxidant

378

assay, which is based on the ability of an antioxidant to reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+ in a redox linked

379

colorimetric reaction, which involves one electron transfer. Different studies have reported

380

that there is a direct correlation between antioxidative activities and reducing power of

381

certain protein hydrolysates and peptides (Duh et al. 1999; Bougatef et al. 2009). The

382

reducing power of the different fractions at 0.1mg/ml and 0.5mg/ml is shown in Table 4. In

383

general, the reducing power was found to be very low for all the fractions at the

384

concentrations tested and it showed a concentration dependency. There was no significant

385

difference between the different fractions even though the lower molecular weight fractions

386

showed higher reducing power when the concentration was increased to 0.5mg/ml. None of

387

the fractions were as efficient as ascorbic acid.

388 389

The ability of the different fractions of herring brine to inhibit lipid oxidation was tested in

390

a liposome model system and compared with that of BHT. This method was used because it

391

mimics the biological membrane and it has been used extensively for in vitro lipid

16

392

peroxidation studies (Duh et al., 1999; Westerlund et al., 1996). Similar to metal chelating

393

activity and reducing power all the fractions showed poor inhibition of lipid oxidation in the

394

liposome model system (Table 4). In this system the >50kDa fraction was better than the

395

other fractions and there was a reduction in TBARS formation as the concentration increases

396

in all fractions except for the pH precipitated fraction. All the fractions were significantly

397

(p<0.05) less effective than BHT. This was not totally unexpected because in biphasic

398

systems like liposome the solubility of the antioxidant and the location of the antioxidant is

399

crucial for it to have an effective antioxidant activity.

400 401

Free and total amino acid content

402 403

The contents of free amino acids (expressed as g/100 g dry weight) in the pH

404

precipitated fraction and the different UF-fractions are shown in the Table 2. It was found

405

that 50- 10kDa fraction had the highest content of free amino acids followed by 10-1 kDa and

406

the pH precipitated fraction. The predominant free amino acids in the 50-10 kDa fraction

407

were Arg, Lys, Ala, which constituted about 12.4, 11.5, 11.4, % of the total free amino acids

408

respectively and was followed by Glu, Leu , Asp, Ser and His. The major free amino acids in

409

10-1 kDa and pH precipitated fractions were Lys and Arg followed by Leu, Glu, Ser and His.

410

The >50kDa fraction contained the least free amino acids. The major free amino acids in this

411

fraction were Lys, Glu, Ala and Leu which were followed by Arg and Gly.

412

The total amino acid compositions of the different fraction were expressed as % of total

413

amino acids and are shown in the Table 3. All the fractions contained high levels of Lys, His,

414

Asp, Glu and Ala. The 10-1kDa, 50-10kDa fractions showed high levels of Arg, Ser and Pro

415

while the >50kDa and the pH precipitated fractions showed high content of Leu and Val. The

416

fractions showed typical amino acid profile of muscle proteins. 17

417

Several amino acids have been reported to show antioxidant activity (Karel, et al. 1966;

418

Marcuse, 1960 & 1962). His, Thr, Lys, and Met were reported to have antioxidant activity in

419

sunflower oil emulsions (Riison et al. 1980). Good antioxidant activity was reported for His

420

and Trp in both linoleic acid and methyl linoleate emulsions (Marcuse, 1962). His exhibits

421

strong radical-scavenging activity due to the presence of the imidazole ring (Yong and Karel,

422

1978). The higher radical scavenging activity of the 10-1kDa and 50-10kDa fractions may be

423

due the presence of higher amounts of His both as free form and in peptide form. However,

424

His also has a strong tendency to invert to a pro-oxidative effect at higher concentrations

425

(Marcuse, 1962). Moreover the antioxidant role of His in different lipid oxidation system is

426

not consistent. Erickson et al. (1990) found that His stimulated the oxidation of flounder

427

sarcoplasmic reticulum while Karel et al. (1966) reported that His inhibited lipid oxidation in

428

a freeze dried model system. The ability of His to accelerate Fe-dependent peroxidation has

429

also been reported and proposed to be due to the chelation of the iron at the imidazole ring,

430

which was found to enhance the prooxidative activity of iron (Winkler et al. 1984; Din et al.

431

1988). This is in agreement with the poor performance of these fractions in liposomes were

432

the oxidation is induced by iron/ascorbate.

433 434

Antioxidant activity of the isolated fractions in 5% oil–in-water emulsions

435

In order to further assess the antioxidant potential in food emulsions, all fractions

436

were tested at a protein concentration of 1g/ml in 5% fish oil in water emulsion. The results

437

of PV, AV and tocopherol loss are shown in Figure 4. Peroxide value increased in all samples

438

as the storage progressed. The emulsions containing the different fractions were able to delay

439

the PV development for the first 12h of storage and thereafter PV increased significantly in

440

all fractions. At the end of the storage period, i.e. 48h there was no significant difference

18

441

between the control and the tested fractions while BHT showed a significantly lower PV

442

throughout the entire storage period (Figure 3a). In contrast to PV, the anisidine values and

443

the tocopherol loss revealed that all fractions except the pH precipitated fractions were

444

efficient antioxidants and were comparable to BHT (Figure 3b & 3c). The 10-50kDa fraction

445

resulted in the lowest anisidine value and the highest tocopherol content and was not

446

significantly (p<0.05) different from BHT during the entire period of storage. Based on the

447

assay performed we can speculate that the antioxidant activity of the 10-50kDa fraction is due

448

to its radical scavenging activity. Chen et al. (1996) proposed that the antioxidant activity of

449

peptides depended on amino acid compositions and their sequences. Under certain

450

experimental conditions, some amino acids such as Gly, Met or Trp have been reported to

451

accelerate oxidation even though they have been reported to act as antioxidants in other

452

studies (Marcuse, 1962; Matsushita, & Ibuki, 1965). Moreover, as mentioned above the

453

herring brine fractions had poor iron chelating ability which might be due to the fact that the

454

fractions might contain already some iron chelated to peptides and therefore are unable to

455

chelate more metals. Poor performance in iron induced oxidation towards liposome model

456

system when compared to 5% oil-in-water emulsions maybe explained by the difference in

457

the bi-phasic system used and the location of the antioxidant at the interface oil/water which

458

has been showed to be essential. However, the fractions were tested at much higher

459

concentration in the oil–in-water emulsion (1g/ml) compared to the liposome model system

460

(0.5g/ml) and this could explain the difference between the liposome assays and the oil-in-

461

water emulsions assay. More investigations are needed to further characterize the peptides

462

present in herring brine and their potential antioxidant activity.

463

Conclusions

464

In conclusion this investigation revealed the presence of some antioxidant peptides in

465

the salted herring brine. The isolation procedure for the peptides and proteins in this study 19

466

showed that the UF fractionation works well for herring brine and it can effectively eliminate

467

high content of salt content of the fractions. The functional properties of the isolated fractions

468

were lower than that of the sodium caseinate and BSA. The lower molecular weight fractions

469

showed good radical scavenging properties. However all the fractions were low in reducing

470

power and iron chelating activity which might explain their poor performance in iron induced

471

oxidation system such as liposomes. This suggests that components of the herring brine

472

fractions primarily act as free radicals scavengers with the fraction between 50 and 10 kDa

473

being the most potent. Even though PV data showed some protection up to 12 h, AV and

474

tocopherol loss showed that all the fractions were effective in preventing oxidation in 5% fish

475

oil in water emulsion. Further purification and characterisation of these fractions are needed

476

to explain the discrepancies in the antioxidant activities of the peptides in simple model

477

system compared to more complex emulsion systems. In emulsions systems several factors

478

are known to be important in relation to oxidation and these include for example the type,

479

properties, location of the prooxidants/antioxidant and especially their location at the

480

interface lipid/water. Finally, one should not forget that the classic in-vitro tests for

481

measuring antioxidant activity are not always reliable to demonstrate antioxidant activities in

482

food and tests in food matrices are always recommended.

483

Acknowledgments

484

Authors are very grateful to The Technical University of Denmark for supporting this

485

research.

486

References

487 488

1. Andersen E, Andersen M, Baron C.P. (2007) Characterisation of oxidative changes in salted herring during ripening. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55, 9545-9553.

20

489 490 491 492 493 494

2. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, Salt (Chlorine as Sodium Chloride) in Seafood. Potentiometric Method, Method nr 976.18: AOAC: Arlington, VA, 2000. 3. AOCS (1992) official method Ce 8-89: determination of tocopherols and tocotrienols in vegetable oils and fats by HPLC. AOCS, Champaign. 4. AOCS (1994) Official method Cd 18–90: p-Anisidine value. Am Oil Chem Soc, Champaign

495

5. Aro T, Tahvonen R , Mattila T, Nurmi J, Sivonen T, & Kallio H. (2000) Effects of

496

Season and Processing on Oil Content and Fatty Acids of Baltic Herring (Clupea

497

harengus membras). Journal Agricultural Food Chemistry, 48, 6085–6093.

498 499

6. Bligh EG, & Dyer WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology, 37, 900–917

500

7. Bougatef A, Hajji M, Balti R, Lassoued I, Triki-Ellouz & Nasri M (2009) Antioxidant

501

and free radical-scavenging activities of smooth hound (Mustelus mustelus) muscle

502

protein hydrolysates obtained by gastrointestinal proteases. Food Chemistry,

503

114,1198–1205.

504

8. Branen A (1975) Toxicology and biochemistry of butylated hydroxyanisole and

505

butylated hydroxytolulene. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 58, 645-

506

652.

507

9. Buege JA, & Aust SD (1978) Microsomal lipid peroxidation. In S. Fleisher, & L.

508

Packer (Eds.), Methods in enzymology, Biomembranes, Part C: Biological oxidation

509

(Vol. 52, pp. 302–310). London: Academic Press.

510

10. Byun HG, Lee JK, Park HG, Jeon JK, Kim SK (2009) Antioxidant peptides isolated

511

from the marine rotifer, Brachionus rotundiformis. Process Biochemistry, 44, 842–

512

846.

21

513

11. Chen HM, Muramoto K, Yamauchi F & Nokihara K (1996) Antioxidant activity of

514

designed peptides based on the antioxidative peptide isolated from digests of a

515

soybean protein. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 44, 2619–2623.

516

12. Christensen M, Andersen E, Christensen L, Andersen M.L, Baron, C.P. (2011)

517

Textural and biochemical changes during ripening of salted herrings. J Sc. Food

518

Agric. 2011, 91, 330-336.

519

13. Desai PV, Wadekar RR, Kedar GH, & Patil KS (2008) Free radical scavenging

520

activity of aqueous extract of roots of Baliospermum montanum Muell-Arg.

521

International Journal of Green Pharmacy, 2,31-33

522

14. Din MS, Schaur RJ, & Schauenstein E (1988) Uptake of ferrous iron histidinate, a

523

promoter of lipid peroxidation, by Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. Biochimica et

524

Biophysics Ada, 962 37-41.

525

15. Dinis TCP, Madeira VMC, & Almeida LM (1994) Action of phenolic derivatives

526

(acetaminophen, salicylate, and 5-aminosalicylate) as inhibitors of membrane lipid

527

peroxidation and as peroxyl radical scavengers. Archieves of Biochemistry and

528

Biophysics, 315, 161-169.

529

16. Dorman HJD, Peltoketo A, Hiltunen R & Tikkanen MJ (2003) Characterization of the

530

antioxidant properties of deodorised aqueous extracts from selected Lamiaceae Herbs.

531

Food Chemistry, 83, 255–262.

532

17. Duh PD, Du PC & Yen GC (1999) Action of methanolic extract of mung bean hulls

533

as inhibitors of lipid peroxidation and non-lipid oxidative damage. Food and

534

Chemical Toxicology, 37, 1055–1061.

535 536

18. Erickson MC, Hultin H, & Borhan M (1990) Effect of Cytosol on Lipid Peroxidation in Flounder Sarcoplasmic Reticulum. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 14, 407-419

22

537

19. Farvin KHS, Baron CP, Nielsen NS, Otte J, Jacobsen C (2010) Antioxidant activity of

538

yoghurt peptides: Part 2 – Characterization of peptide fractions. Food Chemistry, 123,

539

1090-1097.

540 541

20. Frankel EN (2005) In Edwin N. Frankel (Ed.) Lipid oxidation (2nd ed.). Bridgwater, UK: The Oily Press, P.J. Barnes Associates.

542

21. Gbogouri GA, Linder M, Fanni J & Parmentier M (2004) Influence of hydrolysis

543

degree on the functional properties of salmon byproduct hydrolysates. Journal of Food

544

Science, 69, 615–622.

545

22. Grimble GK, Rees RG, Keohane PP (1987) Effects of peptide chain length on

546

absorption

547

Gastroenterology, 92, 136–142.

of

egg

protein

hydrolysates

in

the

normal

human

jejunum.

548

23. Hsu KC, Lu GH, Jao CL (2009) Antioxidative properties of peptides prepared from

549

tuna cooking juice hydrolysates with orientase (Bacillus subtilis). Food Research

550

International, 42, 647–652.

551 552

24. International IDF standards (1991) Section 74A: 1991. International Dairy Federation, IDF-square Vergot 41, Brussels, Belgium.

553

25. Je JY, Kim SY, Kim SK (2005) Preparation and antioxidative activity of hoki frame

554

protein hydrolysate using ultrafiltration membranes. European Food Research and

555

Technology, 221, 157-162.

556

26. Je JY, Park PJ, Kim SK (2005) Antioxidant activity of a peptide isolated from Alaska

557

pollack (Theragra chalcogramma) frame protein hydrolysate. Food Research

558

International, 38, 45–50.

559

27. Jun SY, Park PJ, Jung WK, Kim SK (2004) Purification and characterization of an

560

antioxidative peptide from enzymatic hydrolysate of yellowfin sole ( Limanda aspera)

561

frame protein. European Food Research and Technology, 219, 20-26.

23

562

28. Karel M, Tannenbaum SR, Wallace DH, & Maloney H (1966) Antioxidation of

563

methyl linoleate in freeze-dried model systems. III. Effects of added amino acids.

564

Journal of Food Science, 31, 892–896.

565

29. Klompong V, Benjakul S, Kantachote D, Shahidi F (2007) Antioxidative activity and

566

functional properties of protein hydrolysate of yellow stripe trevally (Selaroides

567

leptolepis) as influenced by the degree of hydrolysis and enzyme type. Food

568

Chemistry, 102, 1317–1327.

569

30. Kristinsson HG & Rasco BA (2000) Fish protein hydrolysates: production,

570

biochemical, and functional properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science and

571

Nutrition, 40, 43–81.

572

31. Kudo K, Onodera S, Takeda Y, Benkeblia N and Shiomi N (2009) Antioxidative

573

activities of some peptides isolated from hydrolyzed potato protein extract. Journal of

574

Functional Foods, 1, 170-176.

575

32. Lawal OS, Adebowale KO & Adebowale YA (2007) Functional properties of native

576

and chemically modified protein concentrates from bambarra groundnut. Food

577

Research International, 40, 1003–1011.

578

33. Linderschmidt R, Trylka A, Goad M & Witschi H(1986) The effects of dietary

579

butylated hydroxytoluene on liver and colon tumor development in mice. Toxicology,

580

38, 151-160.

581

34. Marcuse R (1960) Antioxidative effect of amino acids. Nature, 186, 886–887.

582

35. Marcuse R (1962) The effect of some amino acids on the oxidation of linolenic acid

583

and its methyl ester. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 39, 97–103.

584

36. Matsushita S, & Ibuki F (1965) Antioxidative and prooxidative abilities of some

585

biological substances and physiologically active substances on the oxidation of

586

unsaturated fatty acids. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 29, 792-795.

24

587

37. Monchi M, Rerat AA (1993) Comparison of net protein utilization of milk protein

588

mild enzymatic hydrolysates and free amino acid mixtures with a close pattern in the

589

rat. Journal Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 17, 355–363.

590

38. Mutilangi WAM, Panyam D & Kilara A (1996) Functional properties of hydrolysates

591

from proteolysis of heat-denatured whey protein isolate. Journal of Food Science, 61,

592

270–274.

593

39. Nielsen HH (1995) Proteolytic enzyme activities in salted herring during cold storage.

594

Ph.D. thesis, Danish Institute for Fisheries Research, Technical University of

595

Denmark, Lyngby.

596

40. Nielsen HH, & Børresen T (1997) The influence ofintestinal proteinases on ripening

597

ofsalted herring. In Luten JB, Brresen T, & Oehlenschlager J. (Eds.), Seafood from

598

producer to consumer, integrated approach to quality (pp. 193–304). Amsterdam:

599

Elsevier Science.

600

41. Oyaizu M (1986) Studies on products of browning reactions: Antioxidative activities

601

of browning products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine. Japanese

602

Journal of Nutrition, 44, 307-315.

603

42. Pacheco-Aguilar R, Mazorra-Manzano MA & Ramı´rez-Sua´rez JC (2008) Functional

604

properties of fish protein hydrolysates from Pacific whiting (Merluccius productus)

605

muscle produced by a commercial protease. Food Chemistry, 109, 782–789.

606

43. Pearce KN & Kinsella J (1978) Emulsifying properties of proteins: evaluation of a

607

turbidimetric technique. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 26, 719–723.

608

44. Peng XY, Xiong YL & Kong BH (2009) Antioxidant activity of peptide fraction from

609

whey protein hydrolysates as measured by electron spin resonance. Food Chemistry,

610

113,196–201.

25

611

45. Riison T, Sims RJ, & Fioriti JA (1980) Effect of amino acids on autoxidation of

612

safflower oil in emulsions. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 57,354–

613

359.

614

46. Samaranayaka AGP, Li-Chan ECY (2008) Autolysis-assisted production of fish

615

protein hydrolysates with antioxidant properties from Pacifichake (Merluccius

616

productus). Food Chemistry, 107, 768–776.

617

47. Sannaveerappa T, Carlsson N, Sandberg A & Undeland I (2007) Antioxidative

618

Properties of Press Juice From Herring (Clupea harengus) Against Hemoglobin (Hb)

619

Mediated Oxidation of Washed Cod Mince. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry,

620

55, 9581–9591.

621

48. Shimada K, Fujikawa K, Yahara K, & Namkamura T (1992) Antioxidative properties

622

of Xanthan on the autooxidation of soyabean oil in cyclodextrin emulsion. Journal of

623

Agricultural Food Chemistry, 40, 945-948.

624

49. Souissi N, Bougatef A, Triki-Ellouz Y & Nasri M (2007) Biochemical and Functional

625

Properties of Sardinella (Sardinella aurita) By-Product Hydrolysates. Food Technol.

626

Biotechnol, 45, 187–194.

627

50. Stefansson G, Nielsen HH, Skara T, Schubring R, Oehlenschalger J, Luten J, Derrick

628

S, & Gudmundsdottir G (2000) Frozen herring as raw material for spice-salting.

629

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 80, 1319–1324.

630 631 632 633

51. Stohs SJ & Bagachi D (1995) Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 18, 321-336. 52. Tao KWCS & Sathe SK (2000) Functional properties and in vitro digestibility of almond (Prunus dulcis L.) protein isolate. Food Chemistry, 69, 153±160

634

53. Westerlund CÖ, Stlund-Lindqvist AM, Sainsbury M, Schertzer HG & Sjöquist PO

635

(1996) Characterization of novel indenoindoles. Part I. Structure-activity relationships

26

636

in different model systems of lipid peroxidation. Biochem. Pharmacol, 51, 1397–

637

1402.

638 639

54. Wilding P, Lillford PJ & Regenstein JM (1984) Functional properties of proteins in foods. Journal of Chemical Technology Biotechnology, 34B, 182-189.

640

55. Winkler P, Lindner W, Esterbauer H, Schauenstein E, Schaur RJ, Khoschsorur GA

641

(1984) Detection of 4-hydroxynonenal as a product of lipid peroxidation in native

642

Ehrlich ascite tumor cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 796, 232–237

643

56. Wu WU, Hettiarachchy NS & Qi M (1998) Hydrophobicity, Solubility, and

644

Emulsifying Properties of Soy Protein Peptides Prepared by Papain Modification and

645

Ultrafiltration, Journal of American Oil Chemists Society, 75, 845–850.

646

57. Xue Z, Yu W, Liu Z, Wu M, Kou X & Wang J (2009) Preparation and Antioxidative

647

Properties of a Rapeseed (Brassica napus) Protein Hydrolysate and Three Peptide

648

Fractions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57, 5287-5293.

649

58. Yang JI, Ho HY, Chu YJ & Chow CJ (2008) Characteristic and antioxidant activity of

650

retorted gelatin hydrolysates from cobia (Rachycentron canadum) skin. Food

651

Chemistry, 110, 128–136

652

59. Yong SH, & Karel, M. (1978). Reaction of histidine with methyl linoleate:

653

Characterization of histidine degradation product. Journal of the American Oil

654

Chemists’ Society, 55, 352–356

655

60. Zeller D, Rossing P, Harper S, Persson L, Booth S, Pauly D (2011) The Baltic Sea:

656

Estimates of total fisheries removals 1950–2007. Fisheries Research, 108, 356–363.

657

61. Zhuang Y, Sun L, Zhao X, Wang J, Hou H and Li B (2009) Antioxidant and

658

melanogenesis-inhibitory activities of collagen peptide from jellyfish (Rhopilema

659

esculentum). Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture, 89, 1722–1727.

660 27

661

Figure Captions

662

Figure 1: Illustration of the separation sequence used for herring brine fractionation

663

into different fractions

664

Figure 2: Functional properties of different herring brine fractions (1% protein) at pH

665

7 a) emulsion activity index and b) emulsion stability index.

666

Figure 3: Emulsifying and foaming properties of herring brine fractions measured at

667

different pH values (2, 4, 6, 8 and 10) and using a) emulsifying activity, b)

668

emulsifying stability, (with sodium caseinate as reference), c) foaming capacity and d)

669

foaming stability (using BSA as reference).

670

Figure 4: Antioxidant effect of different herring brine fractions (1g/ml) in 5% fish

671

oil-in-water emulsions using FeSO4 (100 M) as initiator. With a) Peroxide value b)

672

Anisidine value and c) tocopherol loss.

28

673 674

Table. 1. Protein, salt and dry matter content of the 675 different fraction of herring brine. Protein Salt content Dry matter 676 (mg/ml) (%) (%) pH 18.5±0.13 22.6±0.4 25.11±0.3677 Precipitated Fraction 678 >50 kDa 37.8±0.1 2.3±0.1 7.9±0.7 10-50kDa 2.3±0.1 1.7±0.3 2.1±0.0 679 1-10kDa 1.1±0.0 1.5±0.0 2.1±0.6 <1 KDa 7.4±0.2 23.5±0.1 22.2±0.5 680 681 682 683

29

684 685

Table 2.Free Amino acid composition expressed in g/100g dry weight and in % of total amino acids (in brackets) of different herring brine fractions

686

Lys Arg Ala Leu Met Phe Pro Thr Tyr Asp Ser Glu Val His Trp Ile Gly total

pH >50kDa 50-10kDa 10-1 kDa precipitate d fraction 0.61 (9.6) 0.53 (13.9) 1.26 (11.5) 0.97 (12.4) 0.67 (10.6) 0.24 (6.4) 1.37 (12.4) 0.93 (11.9) 0.43 (6.8) 0.36 (9.5) 1.26 (11.4) 0.55 (6.9) 0.56 (8.9) 0.36 (9.5) 0.87 (7.9) 0.72 (9.2) 0.16 (2.5) 0.10 (2.6) 0.46 (4.2) 0.30 (3.8) 0.27 (4.3) 0.17 (4.5) 0.27(2.5) 0.25 (3.1) 0.22 (3.5) 0.09 (2.4) 0.28 (2.5) 0.26 (3.4) 0.22 (3.5) 0.13 (3.4) 0.40 (3.7) 0.26 (3.3) 0.20 (3.2) 0.13 (3.4) 0.31(2.8) 0.22 (2.8) 0.44 (6.9) 0.20 (5.3) 0.73 (6.7) 0.45(5.7) 0.47(7.4) 0.20(5.1) 0.68 (6.2) 0.50 (6.4) 0.69(10.9) 0.44 (11.7) 0.95 (8.6) 0.67 (8.5) 0.33(5.2) 0.18 (4.7) 0.59 (5.4) 0.51(6.5) 0.45(7.0) 0.20 (5.2) 0.66 (6.0) 0.49 (6.2) 0.06(1.0) 0.02 (0.6) 0.05 (0.4) 0.02 (0.3) 0.17 (2.7) 0.21(5.4) 0.33 (3.0) 0.34(4.4) 0.38 (6.0) 0.23 (6.2) 0.51(4.6) 0.40 (5.1) 6.34(100) 3.79 (100) 10.99(100) 7.84 (100)

687 688

30

689 690

Table 3. Amino acid composition (expressed as % of total amino acids) of different herring brine fractions

Lys Arg Ala Cys Leu Met Phe Pro Thr Tyr Asp Ser Glu Hyp Val His Trp Ile Gly total

pH >50kDa 5010-1 precipitated 10kDa kDa fraction 11.5 12.4 14.3 15.2 3.9 2.6 7.3 6.7 7.8 9.4 8.9 7.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.0 10.1 9.6 5.8 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 5.5 2.4 1.6 4.3 4.9 5.1 6.2 3.6 3.4 3.3 2.5 2.5 1.9 0.9 0.8 7.7 10.5 7.8 8.7 3.4 4.7 7.6 5.1 14.5 9.5 15.4 16.3 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.0 6.9 6.2 5.3 5.7 11.5 10.9 12.6 16.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.5 2.8 2.3 3.1 2.3 0.0 0.0 100 100 100 100

691 692 31

693 694 695 696

Table.4. In vitro antioxidant activity of isolated herring brine fractions.

697 698

Results are the mean values ± Standard deviation. Samples followed by the same letter are not significantly different in Bonferroni post test using 0.05 level of significance. Comparison between different protein concentration: a, b, and fractions: v,w, x, y.

699

Fractions

DPPH radical scavenging (%)

Protein concentration (mg/ml) 0.1 0.5 pH precipitated fraction >50 kDa 50-10kDa 10-1kDa BHT (0.2 mg/mL) EDTA(0.2 mg/mL) Ascorbic acid(0.2 mg/mL)

10.9±0.1av 10.4±0.7av 10.8±1.8av 15.1±0.9aw -

36.1±2.2bv 37.2±3.4bv 54.2±0.9bw 69.1±1.7bx 79.8 ± 1.0y -

Fe2+cheating activity (%)

Protein concentration(mg/ml) 0.1 0.5 6.1±0.2ax 5.0±0.9aw 3.4±0.5av 6.2±0.2ax

6.3±0.0avw 5.1±0.8av 5.1±0.5bv 7.9±0.8bx

Reducing power (OD at 700nm) Protein concentration (mg/ml) 0.1 0.5 0.05±0.0 av 0.02±0.0 av 0.06±0.0 av 0.08±0.0av

0.14±0.0bv 0.07±0.0av 0.24±0.0bv 0.34±0.0bv

93.7 ± 0.2y 2.3 ± 0.3w

700 701 702 32

Liposome system (µmoles of MDA formed/mg PL after 1h) Protein concentration (mg/ml) 0.1 0.5 9.3±1.1av 8.4±0.3av 9.3±0.0av 9.6±0.4av

9.5±0.7awx 7.8±0.4aw 8.8±0.3aw 8.9±0.4aw 2.43±0.99v

703 704

Figure 1:

Salted Herring Brine

705 706 707 708 709

Adjusting pH 4.5 Centrifugation (Supernatant)

pH precipitated Fraction (Precipitate)

UF 50 KDa

710 (Permeate)

>50 KDa Fraction (Retentate)

711 712 713 714 715

UF 10 KDa (Permeate)

50-10 KDa Fraction (Retentate)

UF 1 KDa 10-1 KDa Fraction (Retentate)

716 717

High salt Fraction (Permeate Discarded)

718 719

33

722

723

724

725

34 m

a na te

ca se i

kD

10 -1

30

So di u

0

D a

50

10 k

50

a

100

>5 0k D

io n

fr ac t

(a) Emulsion stability Index

200

50 -

d

ta te

pi

pr ec i

a

na te

ca se i

10 -1 kD

Emulsion activity index 150

So di um

0k D a

a

0k D

>5

io n

fr ac t

50 -1

ita te d

pr ec ip

721

pH

pH

720

Figure 2

pH7 pH7

40

(b)

20

10 0

400

(a ) pH 2 pH 4

300

pH 6 pH 8

200

pH 10

100

0 p H p re c ip ita te d fra c tio n

E m u l s io n s t a b il it y i n d e x ( m in )

Figure 3

E m u l s if y i n g a c t iv i t y i n d e x ( m 2 /g )

726

100

(b )

pH 4

80

pH 6

60

pH 8 pH 10

40

20

0 p H p re c ip ita te d fra c tio n

S o d iu m c a s e in a te

(c ) 80

150

pH 2

S o d iu m c a s e in a te

(d ) pH 2

pH 4 pH 6

100

pH 8 pH 10

50

F o a m in g s t a b ilit y ( % )

F o a m in g c a p a c it y ( % )

pH 2

pH 4

60

pH 6 pH 8

40

pH 10

20

0

0 p H p re c ip ita te d fra c tio n

p H p re c ip ita te d fra c tio n

BSA

727 35

BSA

728

Figure 4 (a)

PV (meq/kg oil)

25

Control pH precipitated fraction >50kDa 50-10kDa 10-1kDa BHT

20 15 10 5 0 0

12 24 Storage time in hours

Anisidine Value

50

48

(b)

Control pH precipitated fraction >50kDa 50-10kDa 10-1kDa BHT

40 30 20 10 0

Total Tocopherol (ug/g lipid)

0

12 24 Storage time in hours

250

48

(c)

Control pH pre cipitate d fraction

200

>50kDa

150

50-10kDa 10-1kDa

100

BHT

50 0 0

12 24 Storage time in hours

48

729 730 36

Research Highlights 

50-10kDa and 10-1kDa fractions showed good radical scavenging activity



All the fractions had low iron chelating activity



All fractions delayed the development of PV and showed low AV and tocopherol loss in emulsions



The fraction 50-10kDa showed the best antioxidant potential in oil-in-water emulsion