Apparent changes in yeast whole-cell ribonucleic acid base composition during growth

Apparent changes in yeast whole-cell ribonucleic acid base composition during growth

IMICA ET BIOPHY$ICA ACTA Y E A S T W H O L E - C E L L RIBC ?OSITION DURING GROWT ACID D. I. E D D Y boratory Pty. Ltd*, Sydney, N.S.W. (A~ (Recei...

371KB Sizes 0 Downloads 25 Views

IMICA ET BIOPHY$ICA ACTA

Y E A S T W H O L E - C E L L RIBC ?OSITION DURING GROWT

ACID

D. I. E D D Y

boratory Pty. Ltd*, Sydney, N.S.W. (A~ (Received S e p t e m b e r 2oth, I963'3)

SUMMARY

I. A non-growing and non-dividing cell population relation of Sacc; ; an average whole-cell RNA molar purine/pyrimidir midine ratio c eristic of that physiological state. 2. However, growing and dividing populations of ccells have ~rage whole-cell RNA purine/pyrimidine ratios lower lby up to, ', above value only with cessation of growth and/or multiplicati, mt tionary phase.

revisiae 5, char~tically, cling to Vinto a

INTRODUCTION

It has ]as been reported, with evidence from a variety of sources, sou that irrespective of the th~ conditions ~ditions of growth obtaining, the molar ratios of the bases ] in whole-cell RNA aarc re relativel" ~tively invariable for a given organism 1. Confirmatior nation of this can be found in the th~ ext ~eriments of LOMBARD AND CI-IARGAFF~ using Esch¢,ichia coli, BOURDETs usingLg Sacc :charomyces cerevisiae and THOMAS4 using a torula yeast ~ (Torulops, s (Candida ~ndida)

utilis). While it thus seemed probable nlo_roll "I~ATA a ¢ o Nwnr~t~¢ifi,~n n whole-cell RNA hbase com t ~osition non examine the base composition ition of a invariability of the stationlary phase iological ages.

that cells might attain al a relatively invariabk riable ,-,~l,~+{,~n c,rn~, completion ~off growth, it was of interest also to tc population during growth to see whether the th~ organism's RNA was reflected at earlier phys'S-

EXPERIMENTAL

The organism used was Saccharor, ~ccharomyces r0~ ~ cerevisiae (strain DGI-Io3, Dansk Gaerings LgsIndustri, Copenhagen, Denmark namark) sampled from the final stage of a multi-stage lin dustrial "differential" fermentati mentation, involving the continuous addition of carbocarbo hydrate as blackstrap molasses .sses in a predetermined approximately exponential fashior ~shion under strongly aerobic conditions nditions. Lons. Samples were taken at 3o-min intervals from time o to 16.5 h, centrifuged, and the sedimented cells washed at the centrifuge with tap water. On resuspension of the cell, :ells A b b r e v i a t i o n : P u / P y , purine/p~ arine/pyrimidine. " Subsidiary of Mauri Brothers ~thers a n d T h o m s o n L t d .

Biochira. Biophys. Acta, 8o (1964) 373-37~8

D. I. E D D Y

ntaining 6o-15o mg of dry yeast , for pxd immediately resedimented. )n of the R N A of non-growing an~ ag cells ing cells, similar quantities of eac tples of yeasts from factories in New Zeal; , Great mstralia were also examined. ns with io ml of cold IO o/ acid at /o tric] I to remove acid-soluble material : is. The ion with acid was left overnight i ~thanol te at o-4 °, to remove excess trichl id. The ,portions of yeast d r y matter and trichloroacetic acid were chos. almost nplete removal of acid-soluble phosphorus-containing compouI minary ~eriments it had been found that three successive Io-ml Io-r. portiol ~moved 6 and 2 ~o of the total acid-extractable phosphorus from i ut only 300 ~f I0 o/ 'east. An aci 9 and 4 % from some 2.5 times this q u a n t i t y of yeas /o s used because of the observation 5 that this was the o p t i m u n ion for ,. extraction of acid-soluble polyphosphates from ye mast. Lipid materials were extracted with successive Io-ml I, voh thanol, thanol-chloroform (I :I, v/v) and n-butanol at room temp 3 ° rain :h, followed b y two ether washings to remove excess exc, n-but ling to ,RTIN AND ~¢[ORTON 9. This was found to be superior to successi, ns with ml volumes of ethanol, ethanol-chloroform ( 3 : I , v/v) tu 1-ether I, v/v) twice and ether twice at 0-4 ° for 3o min each, both in time consumed and nd the extraction of 2o °/o more non-nucleic acid phosph( ~horus. Lipid extraction after removal of acid-soluble sub:stances has, in some hands nds losses:n. Quadruplicate samples of OCC~asioned losses of R N A m, and in other hands no losses ressed yeast were subjected to four different extraction extractic procedures in this laboraa pressed v brief washing in ethanoltoryy (a) asreported under EXPERIMENTAL, (b) as in (a) but with in ether er (3 :I) and ether in place of lipid extraction, (c) as iin (b) but with hydrolysis m :tmn e: and ((t) extraction 0.3 N K O H at 35 ° for 6o min (see ref. 12) instead off KC1 extraction, of whole whole cells with an equal volume of 9 ° °/o phenol at room r. temperature for 60 mln min lowed b' by ethanol precipitation of RNA. The P u / P y • values va obtained ( ± S . D . ) were, followed respectively, I. I 1-4-o.o3, I..zi-¢-o.o3, i I -t--O.O o.c o . 8 1 ± o . o 6 and z.13±o.o2. KC1 extracts of the residues from (c) and (d) gave ve R N A with ratios 1.13 + o . 0 8 and 1.13 ! o . o 2 , respectively7. No selective loss of R N A as a result of lipid removal was revealed b y these results, 'ent raneous phosphorus compounds in method c is apparent but the interference of extraneous (see also, e.g., ref. 14). .Sslum ~rs were twice extracted with 13 % KC1 in o.1 M potassium The ether-dried powders acetate-acetic acid buffer (pH 4.0) at 95 °. The extracts and single water washin~g ime were made to ioo ml wi~h water. It had previously been found that the total timt nlof extraction rather than the volume of extracting solution (above a given mixnimal volume) was more important. Consequently, the original 3o- and I5-min eextraction periods 9 were increased •eased to 90 min each. moder-dried yeast with 0.3 N K O H at 37 ° for 60 min (a mod. Extraction of the ether-dried ISON ification of the SCHMIDT AND THANNHAUSER13 method suggested b y HUTCmSOI~ A N D 1MUNRO 12) w a s found to be unsatisfactory when applied to yeast, because of oJ •action of phosphorus from replicates, and extraction b)Y erratic and excessive extraction Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 8 o (1964) 3 7 3 37~8 ~

YEAST RNA BASE COMPOSITION

(c]. ref. 15) interfering wit

Lt esti-

~RENSON AND DE DEKEN TM imprc

HMIDT

lymers

sorbing the ribomononucleotides Lkaline e) at p H 7.8, washing the resin ng the
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results of the experiment Lent on growing cells are shown in Fig. I. A decline in whole-cell R N A P u / P y ratio from 0.82, followed by a rise after 4 h to a final value of Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 8o (1964) 373-378

D.

;

'

I. EDDY

'

'

' '~'

, '

'

'

;5'

Time (h)

ge whole-cell RNA Pu/Py ratio ( © - © - O ) of aerobically g r o w n yeast. P u / P y ratio w a s e s t i m a t e d v i a t h e acid NA. of b u f f e r e d K C l - e x t r a c t e d lZNA

(P)z60 mg ~) ribose

weight 2 occurred. Truly stationary conditions were not a,.chieved i tease of 5.5 %/h continued even at harvest. Light of as discoun Differential extraction of distinct RNA species w wa •ic acid npleteness of extraction as judged b y Az,0m~ meassurements :tion of facts of the residues from KC1 extraction, and of the ol)bservatio] 6 h did [A from acid-extracted and delipidated yeast with II(0 ~0 NaC] 'olysed, of d : significantly alter base ratios in comparison with those t] ~xtracted ~RNA3. Fig. I. Changes with time in values of e(P) of the extrac.cts are als midine, ese are quite compatible with the known lower molar absorptiv ~ (ref. 23.) From Fig. I the npared with purine, mononucleotides at p H 4•and 26om# 260 ~ntent of extracts on either acid~lihood of error in basing estimates of RNA content l]Kel] RNA ~arlson with a sample of RI~A dle ribose or A,e0m~ measurements, even in compari: labile little error is introduced byY "ived from the same organism, is apparent. However, derived u se )horus/o.o97 at any physiological age becaus~ culating RNA content as R N A phosphorus/o.o97 m calculatin ) m with changes in base comthe small variation in phosphorus content of RNA of position. 'easts are shown in Table I. I The results of the examination of commercial ye ',lls. :tle invariabilit' invariability in P u / P y ratio was apparent in these supposedly " m a t u r e " cells Little centag of cells in the sample: ples bearing buds, as indices of oJ ,wever. plotting ~lottin¢ the percentag oercenta~e However, NA RN2~ the average physiological ages of the populations, against average whole-cell R ical rrelation of coefficient --0.62 (P < 0.005). Physiologica P u l P y ratios showed a correla 'as state or age thus has a l;profound influence on the average base composition (a, de I] P u / P y ratio) of the RNA off a population of cells (Fig. 2). This is shown also in Table ainimal in the cases of the dried y,easts from factories A, M and N, grown to have minima] )le :ells, and of "seed" yeasts from factory M grown in ample final contents of budding cells, nutrient supply with lowv generation times. Thus there appears to) be a tendency, with cessation of growth and entry into [ue ~verage whole-cell R N A P u / P y ratio to approach a value stationary phase, for the avera characteristic for S. cerevis;iae. Seven samples of yeast of diverse cultivation history:73 led total R N A P u / P y ratio o'I 1.244-o.o 4. Pooling of these these were found to show a pooled )r S. cerevisiae RNA in eight at-81 other papers, and those those values with those given for o values lying within one st~mdard error of estimate of x (o.17) from the x intercept of 'I the regression of x on y inn Fig. 2, gave the value 1.264-o.o6 as the average of 71 estimates. ;-378 Biochim. B~ophys. Acta, 80 (1964) 373-37~

YEAST R N A

BASE COMPOSITION

TABLE I

D D E F F G G H H H

2b 2b 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5

I

5

J K K L L M M M M M N

5 5 5 5 & 6 5 & 6 5 & 6 5"* 5"* 6"* 6" 6"

(P)z60 m# OF WHOLE-CELL RNA AND PER N COMMERCIALLY GROWN YI~AST

~UDDING

ate e s t i m a t e s on 3oo-4oo m g of d r y yea, KCl-extracted from commercially grow

tandard

4oIar u[Py

ding cells

RNA (%)

*(P)

92- o.o4 ~2- o.o2 52-O.Ol 0.892-0.02 o.912-o.o 3 1.142-o.o2 0.762-0.02 1.o82-o.o2 0.842-0.02 1.2°2-°.°4 1.262-O.Ol 1.272-°.°4 1.292-o.o2 1"362-°-°3 1.372-°.°4 0.982-0.02 1.222-°.°3 o.89~o.oI o.83io.o2 1.332-o.o 3 °.912-o.°3 0.742-0.o2 o.872-0.02 1.292-o.o2 1.29~o.o 4

84602- 9o 78202- 65 6 9 3 o I 35 8 9 0 0 ± 90 85002- IOO 803o2- 4 ° 7 5 I O + 9° 7 5 7 o ± 7° 87OO2- 18o 81102- 4 ° 82502- 9 ° 8380 ± 4 ° 84702- 60 838o2- io 84002- 5 ° 86502- 12o 827o2- 3 ° 839o2-18o 840o2- 4 ° 8620-}- 85 78702- 7 ° 67802- 3 ° 7 2 9 o ± 25 8I 502-

..

20

8 0 2 0 ± 60

2.4~ 4.4 ~ 3.4~ 2.7~ 3.14 4-42 3.8~ 4.I] 3.6~ 3.6( 5.o~: 2.91 2.8( 3.2; 3 . 2~ 2.2~ 4.8( 2.6: 3.6.= 4-3( ~.I9 8.1( 8.32 4.75 3.56 2.60

(%) I 12

12 9 15 20 IO

8 I4 7 3 6 4 6 4 7 12

8 12 -15 3 I

* Dried yeast. ** Seed yeast.

It has recently been shown that in Salmonella typh bhimurium increase in growff ,wth o cellular RNA that is riboratee is accompanied by an increase in the proportion of 0aal, as opposed to soluble, from about one-third at 0.2 o.: doublings/h to about 80 °% somal i _ , 21 i1_ [_^£ ~ _\ 1 " 1 :a. . . . . . . . . . . 2 1 _ 1 _ ..... at 2.4 doublings/h (ref. 32). ). If it were possible to draw an analogy between this or. or_._1L.

12__

___

~__

3

21



""o",b,...

I 0.70

0.80

I 0.90



I IL)O

I

l

1.10

1.20

"~t, 1.30

el 1MO

Pu/Py molar ratio Fig. 2. The relationship b e t w e een n aver~ average whole-cell R N A P u / P y ratio and average physiologica ical age as indicated b y percentage of b u d d i n g cells, r ~ --0.62 ( P < o.oo5). The solid line represent )resents the regression y = 24.3--i4.5 x, and the b r o k e n line the regression x = 1.31--o.o27y. P u / P !y ratio was estimated in the same m a n n e r as for Fig. L

Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 80 (1964) 373-371z8

I). I. EDDY suits presented the experiment mpositional

here might be inte: of Fig. I was o.2

changes

predominan

an t h a t in dry gh

not

lble RNA. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

:icism during the preparation

ade to the Directors of Mauri Brol t h i s p a p e r . T h e a u t h o r is i n d e b t e c

lomson Le l a t e )

r. A . L . H U N T AND D r . R . A . BOT'

helpful

of the manuscript. RE FERENCES

Nucleic ~cids, Vol. 3, A c a d e m i c Press, N e w York, 196o, pp. 147-85. k. LOMBARD AND E. CHARGAFF, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 25 (1957) ( 549. k. BOURDET, Th~se, Paris, ]1956. ~.. THOMAS, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 8 (1952) 71. :~. J . KATCHMAN AND V~. O. FETTY, J. Bacteriol., 69 (1955) 6o 7 . 3. J . }{ATCHMAN AND J . 1~. VAN WAZER, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 14 (I [. M. YV'IAME, J. Biol. Chem., 178 (1949) 919. 16o ( ~. JuNI, M. D. KAMEN, S. SPIEGELMAN AND J . M. WIAME, Nature, No ;~. M. MARTIN AND R . K . MORTON, Biochem. J., 64 (1956) 221. 221 ~hys. Acta, 6 ['. HALLINAN, A. FLECK AND H . N . MUNRO, Biochim. Bioph: ~r. C. HUTCHISON, E . D, DOWNIE AND H . N'. MUNRO, Biochim. Biochin Biophys 62) 561. ,V. C. HUTCHISON AND H. N. MUNRO, Analyst, 86 (1961) 768. ). SCHMIDT AND S. J. THANNHAUSER, J. Biol. Chem., 161 (I945) (194 83. (1945) ,1. LEDIG, H . FEIGENBAUM AND P. MANDEL, Biochim. Bioph ~hys. Acta, 72 (1963) 332 • M. /1. R . STETTEN, H . M. I(ATZEN AND D. STETTEN, J. Biol. Chem., C, 232 (1958) 475. M. /[. DE DEKEN-GRENSON AND R. H. DE DEKEN, Biochim. Biop5hys. Aeta, 31 (1959) 195. D. ). F . BOLTZ AND M. G. MELLON, Anal. Chem., I9 (1947) 873. G. ). CERIOTTI, J. Biol. Chem., 2I 4 (1955) 59. j .[. B. ~IARTIN AND D. M. DOTY, Anal. Chem., 21 (1959) 965. H1.. WEIL-MALHERBE AND R . H . GREEN, Bioehem. J., 49 (195 1951 ) 286. M. LINDEGREN, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 4 ° /[. OGUR, S. MINCKLER, G. LINDEGREN AND C. C. LINDEGRE (1952 ) 174. g~. . FARBER, Standard Methods ]or the Examination o/ Water at and Wastewater, A m e r i c a n Public H-Iealth e a l t h Association Inc., N e w York, i l t h ed., 1961, p. 204. K~. . BURTON, in R. M. C. DAWSON, D. C. ELLIOTT, W. H. ELLIOTT AND K . M. JONES, Data [or ELLI Research. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1959, pp. ;74-81. B3iochemical i, A. ~I. CRESTFIELD, l{. C. SM,IITa AND F. \V. ALLEN, J. Biol. Chem., 216 (1955) 185 . ~V. ('. V~'ERKHEISER AND R . J. WINZLER, J. Biol. Chem., 204 (1953) 971. j. N. DAVIDSON AND U. M. S. SMELLIE, Biochem. J., 52 (1952) 594H . S. gORING, J . I.. FAIRLEYV AND H . L. SEAGRAN, J. Biol. Chem., 197 (1952) 823. R . MARKHAM AND J . D. SMITH TH, Biochem. J., 52 (1952) 565 . IK, E. ~¢'ISCHER, C. GREEN, t~. DONIGER AND n . ELSON, J. Biol. E. CHARGAFF, B. MAGASANIK Chem., 186 (195o) 51 . y . KHOUVINE AND H . D E I~OBICHON-SZULMAJSTER, Bull. Soc. Chim. Biol., 34 (1952) I°56~. Biophys. Acta, 61 (1962) 513 . j. E. M. MIDGELEY, Biochim. N . O. t~JELDGAARD AND C. G. KURLAND, J. Mol. Biol., 6 (1963) 341. k. N . BELOZERSKY AND A. S. SPIRIN, in E. CHARGAFF AND AND J. N. Dl

15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22

23

24 25

~6 27 28 29

30

al 32

Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 8o (1964) 373-378