Journal Pre-proofs of multi-element (C, N, H, O) stable isotope ratio analysis for the traceability of milk samples from China Shanshan Zhao, Yan Zhao, Karyne M. Rogers, Gang Chen, Ailiang Chen, Shuming Yang PII: DOI: Reference:
S0308-8146(19)31960-0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125826 FOCH 125826
To appear in:
Food Chemistry
Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date:
17 May 2019 28 October 2019 28 October 2019
Please cite this article as: Zhao, S., Zhao, Y., Rogers, K.M., Chen, G., Chen, A., Yang, S., of multi-element (C, N, H, O) stable isotope ratio analysis for the traceability of milk samples from China, Food Chemistry (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125826
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1
Application of multi-element (C, N, H, O) stable isotope ratio analysis
2
for the traceability of milk samples from China
3
Shanshan Zhao1,2, Yan Zhao1,2* , Karyne M. Rogers3, Gang Chen1,2, Ailiang Chen1,2,
4
Shuming Yang1,2
5
6
1
7
Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
8
2
9
Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China
Institute of Quality Standard & Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Chinese
Key Laboratory of Agro-product Quality and Safety, Ministry of Agriculture and
10
3
11
Zealand
National Isotope Centre, GNS Science, 30 Gracefield Road, Lower Hutt 5040, New
12
13
14
Corresponding author
15
Yan Zhao, Ph. D
16
Tel.: +86-010-8210-6558
17
Fax: +86-010-8210-6560
18
E-mail:
[email protected]
19
ABSTRACT
20
Cow milk samples from various provinces in China were collected, and the effects of
21
lactation stage, sampling time, and geographic origin on the samples were studied by
22
elemental analysis-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (EA-IRMS). Traceability accuracy
23
was determined using δ13C, δ15N, δ2H and δ18O values to specifically assign
24
geographic origin. Stable isotope ratios of C, N, H and O were not significantly
25
different among three lactation stages; however the δ13C, δ15N, and δ18O values of
26
milk were influenced by sampling time. Furthermore, there were highly significant
27
regional differences in the mean δ13C and δ15N values of milk. In summary, the
28
lactation stage had no effect on the traceability of milk, whereas sampling time and
29
geographic origin did affect milk traceability. Different geographic locations with a
30
separation distance greater than 0.7 km can be distinguished using multi-element (C,
31
N, H, O) stable isotope ratio analysis.
32
33
34
35
36
37
Key words: Cow milk; Isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS); Lactation; Sampling
38
time; Geographic origin; Traceability
39
1. Introduction
40
Cow’s milk has extremely high nutritional value. The main proteins in milk are casein,
41
albumin, globulin, and lactoprotein. Dairy contains all 20 amino acids and the eight
42
essential amino acids. Freedom of trade in the global market has led to increasing
43
incidents of fraud regarding milk. For example, some milk powder manufacturers
44
increase the protein content of product by adding low-cost ingredients (such as
45
nitrogen-rich materials) to raise the price of low-quality dairy products. In addition,
46
many bakeries add plant butter, which is easy to shape and affordable but harmful to
47
human health (Ma, Yang, Yang, Zhang, & Xiao, 2017). Thus, the traceability of cow's
48
milk is important.
49
In most countries, cow's milk and its products have been prominent in the dairy
50
market. In China, the dairy industry started late, but has progressed steadily. However,
51
the Chinese dairy industry suffered after the melamine incident of 2008. Since that
52
time, consumers have paid attention to the geographic origin of milk. Thus, milk
53
source control is important to both consumers and manufacturers. A variety of dairy
54
products from specific preferred geographic origins are marketed at higher prices than
55
traditional products making them prime targets for counterfeiting. For instance, Inner
56
Mongolia is a major grassland area, and its rich forage makes desirable milk (Luo,
57
Dong, Luo, Xian, Guo, & Wu, 2015). Therefore, having reliable tools for tracing the
58
source of cow’s milk can protect the safety and quality of the products.
59
In the field of food source analysis, stable isotope ratio analysis is a relatively new
60
technology that has been introduced within the European wine industry to ensure the
61
authenticity of wine provenance and detect food adulteration (Almeida &
62
Vasconcelos, 2001). Stable isotope ratio analysis is an effective method in the fields
63
of geographic origin detection and adulteration analysis. It has been successfully
64
applied to beef (Zhao, Zhang, Chen, Chen, Yang, & Ye, 2013), chicken (Lv & Zhao,
65
2016), pork (Zhao, Yang, & Wang, 2016), honey (Cabanero, Recio, & Ruperez, 2006),
66
fruit juice (Guyon et al., 2014), and essential oil (Rossmann, 2001). Thus, stable
67
isotope ratio analysis techniques are an effective means for distinguishing the
68
geographical origin of food products. Stable isotope ratio analysis has been used to
69
determine the geographic origin of milk in the United States (Bostic, Hagopian, &
70
Jahren, 2018) and New Zealand (Ehtesham, Hayman, Van Hale, & Frew, 2015). This
71
method has also been applied to the traceability of milk from Australia and New
72
Zealand, Germany and France, the USA, and China (Luo et al., 2015). The
73
traceability of other products from adjacent geographic regions using stable isotope
74
ratio analysis have been previously reported. For example, Valenti, et al., (2017)
75
demonstrated that the variability in carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and sulphur
76
stable isotope ratios can discriminate between cheeses produced in nearby regions
77
within a Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) area; the sulphur and nitrogen stable
78
isotope ratios offered the best discrimination (97.2% correct classification of the
79
cheeses). There are no reports, however, as to whether this method can distinguish
80
between milk samples from adjacent or nearby geographic regions in China.
81
Factors such as sampling time may influence the traceability of milk’s geographical
82
origin. Garbaras et al. (2018) investigated the traceability of Belarusian milk with
83
regard to sampling time. Carbon, nitrogen and oxygen stable isotope ratios were
84
measured in milk sampled in Brest, Gomel, Grodno, Minsk, and Mogilev regions in
85
Belarus during the summer and winter seasons. The δ13C values in the milk were
86
found to be different for the summer and winter seasons.
87
Milk traceability can also be affected by lactation changes. Lactation is the most
88
energetically expensive aspect of mammalian reproduction. It involves the export of
89
significant quantities of maternal nutrients to supply offspring demands (Oftedal,
90
1993; Oftedal, 2008). Magdas et al. (2013) observed that that cow milk collected in
91
the second and third months of lactation had the heaviest oxygen and hydrogen
92
isotope ratios. Therefore, changes in these isotopic signatures of milk may have a
93
significant effect on the interpretation of the milk source analysis data.
94
It was previously noted that the use of single variable isotope for geographical
95
discrimination is usually insufficient to provide unequivocal origin assignment (Luo
96
et al., 2015). Thus, milk samples from different provinces in China were collected to
97
study the effect of sampling time and lactation stage on the traceability of milk using
98
multi-element (C, N, H, O) stable isotope ratio analysis in this study. Cross-validation
99
was also performed using δ13C, δ15N, δ2H, and δ18O values to distinguish milk from a
100
smaller geographic region such as within one province based on individual farm
101
traceability. Distances between two farms in each province ranged from 0.7 km to
102
62.8 km.
103
2. Materials and methods
104
2.1 Sample Information
105
2.1.1 Experiment 1: Lactation stage
106
Cow’s milk was sampled from two dairy farms selected from four Chinese provinces
107
(Hebei, Ningxia, Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia) in July 2014 (Fig. 1a). A total of 120
108
milk samples were collected to ensure a representative data set (15 milk samples from
109
each farm) (Table S1). Milk samples were also collected during three different
110
lactation stages: early (30–90 days of lactation), middle (120–180 days of lactation),
111
and late (210–270 days of lactation) (Fig. S1).
112
2.1.2 Experiment 2: Sampling time
113
Milk samples were collected in March, July and November from two dairy farms in
114
each of the four provinces (Tianjin, Hebei, Jiangsu and Inner Mongolia) (Fig. 1b).
115
Five replicate samples were collected from each storage tank during each sampling
116
event (a total of 120 samples) (Table S2; Fig. S1).
117
2.1.3 Experiment 3: Geographic origin
118
In order to study the effect of geographic origin on milk traceability, 160 milk
119
samples were measured for stable isotopes (120 milk samples from Hebei, Ningxia,
120
Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia in experiment 1, and 40 milk samples from July from
121
Tianjin, Hebei, Jiangsu, and Inner Mongolia in experiment 2) (Fig. S1). These regions
122
were classified as either a pastoral or agricultural according to the type of cattle and
123
feeding technique practiced at each location. The pastoral regions included Ningxia
124
and Inner Mongolia. The agricultural regions included Hebei, Shaanxi, Tianjin, and
125
Jiangsu. After collection, milk samples were frozen at –20°C and then transported to
126
the laboratory at –20°C.
127
2.2 Preparation of samples
128
Milk samples were kept frozen at –20°C until processing. A 50 g (fresh weight)
129
sample was freeze-dried for 24 h before being powdered in a ball mill.
130
Chloroform:methanol (2:1, v/v) was added to the sample in a centrifuge tube at a 1:5
131
(sample:solution) ratio, and the lid was tightly closed. Samples were agitated in a
132
vortex mixer operating for 10 minutes. The samples were then centrifuged at 5000
133
rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant was removed and discarded, and the solvent wash
134
was repeated two additional times. The samples were then sealed using parafilm with
135
a small hole inserted and lyophilized overnight to dry the samples. The defatted dry
136
mass (DDM) was then weighed and prepared for isotope analysis.
137
2.3 Sample Analysis
138
International reference materials were used for two-point calibrations of the isotope
139
ratios, USGS43 (Indian Hair, δ13C = –21.28‰, δ15N = 8.44‰), USGS40 (L-glutamic
140
acid, δ13C = –26.39‰, δ15N = –4.5‰), CBS (Caribou Hoof, δ2H = –197.0‰, δ18O =
141
3.8‰), KHS (Kudu Horn, δ2H = –54.1‰, δ18O = 20.3‰) developed by the United
142
States Geological Survey, B2159 (Sorghum flour, δ13C = –13.68‰, δ15N = 1.58‰),
143
and protein B2205 (EMA P2, δ2H = –87.80‰, δ18O = 26.90‰) developed by
144
Elemental Microanalysis.
145
2.3.1 δ13C and δ15N analysis
146
For δ13C and δ15N analysis, the DDM as well as the international reference materials
147
were weighed into tin capsules and introduced sequentially into an elemental analyzer
148
(Flash 2000, Thermo Finnigan, Germany). The reactor packings contained 0.85–1.7
149
mm granular chromium oxide, 0.85–1.7 mm silvered granular cobaltous oxide, and 4
150
x 0.5 mm fine copper wires. The helium gas flow rate was 100 mL/min. The oxygen
151
injection velocity was 175 mL/min. The oxygen injection time was 3 s, and the
152
oxygen injection volume was 8.75 mL. The helium dilution pressure was 0.6 bar, the
153
CO2 reference gas pressure was 0.6 bar, and the N2 reference gas pressure was 1.0
154
bar. The samples were combusted at 960°C, and the resulting CO2 and N2 gases were
155
separated by a GC column at 50°C. The gases were then transferred to a Conflo IV
156
(Thermo Finnigan, Germany) interface and into an isotope-ratio mass spectrometer
157
(Delta V Advantage, Thermo Finnigan, Germany). Two-point normalization
158
(stretching) was adopted to ensure accurate isotope ratio measurements via
159
international reference materials (Brand, Coplen, Vogl, Rosner, & Prohaska, 2014;
160
Coplen et al., 2006; Paul, Skrzypek, & Forizs, 2007; Schimmelmann, Albertino,
161
Sauer, Qi, Molinie, & Mesnard, 2009; Werner & Brand, 2001). The international
162
reference materials were analyzed sequentially with the DDM. For the δ13C values of
163
the DDM, USGS40 and B2159 standards were used for two-point normalization. The
164
USGS43 standard was used for quality control (QC). For the δ15N values, the
165
USGS43 and USGS40 standards were used for two-point normalization, and the
166
B2159 standard was used for QC. Blanks consisting of an empty tin capsule were
167
included, and corrections were applied to the results.
168
2.3.2 δ2H and δ18O analysis
169
For δ2H and δ18O analysis, the DDM and the international reference materials were
170
weighed into silver capsules and introduced sequentially into an elemental analyzer
171
(Flash 2000, Thermo Finnigan, Germany). The reactor packing consisted of a glassy
172
carbon tube reactor and silver wool. The helium gas flow rate was 100 mL/min. The
173
helium dilution pressure was 0.6 bar, the CO reference gas pressure was 0.4 bar, and
174
the H2 reference gas pressure was 0.4 bar. Samples were combusted at 1380°C, and
175
the resulting CO and H2 gases were separated by a GC column maintained at 65°C.
176
The gases were then transferred to a Conflo IV (Thermo Finnigan, Germany)
177
interface and into an isotope-ratio mass spectrometer (Delta V Advantage, Thermo
178
Finnigan, Germany). International reference materials were analyzed sequentially
179
with the DDM. CBS and KHS standards were used for a two-point normalization of
180
the DDM δ2H value, and B2205 standard was used for QC. CBS and B2205 standards
181
were used for two-point normalization of the δ18O values; the KHS standard was used
182
for QC. Blanks consisting of an empty silver capsule were included, and corrections
183
were applied to the results.
184
The δ13C, δ15N, δ2H, and δ18O isotope values are reported in δ-notation in per mil (‰)
185
relative to the accepted international standards: Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB),
186
air, and Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (VSMOW). The values were calculated
187
as follows:
188
189
where
is the corrected stable isotope ratio of the sample (‰, per mil),
is
190
the true stable isotope ratio of the international reference material 1,
191
stable isotope ratio of the international reference material 2,
192
stable isotope ratio of the sample,
193
international reference material 1, and
194
the international reference material 2.
195
2.4 Statistical analysis
196
Statistical analysis of the data was undertaken using SPSS 22.0 package for Windows.
197
A post hoc Duncan's test was performed to determine significant differences (p <
198
0.05). The cross-validation accuracy was determined using a three-dimensional partial
199
least square discriminate analysis (PLSDA) to distinguish the geographic origin of
200
each milk sample.
201
3. Results
202
3.1 Effects of lactation stage on the isotope values
203
Figure 2 shows the results of (a) δ13C, (b) δ15N, (c) δ2H, and (d) δ18O in milk samples
204
at different lactation stages in experiment 1. The δ13C values of milk samples were –
205
17.32 ± 1.21‰ at the early lactation stage, –17.95 ± 1.26‰ at the middle lactation
206
stage, and –17.56 ± 1.08‰ at the late lactation stage. The δ15N values in milk samples
207
were 3.72 ± 0.48‰ at the early lactation stage, 3.82 ± 0.56‰ at the middle lactation
208
stage, and 3.81 ± 0.65‰ at the late lactation stage. The δ2H values in milk samples
209
were –94.62 ± 20.48‰ at the early lactation stage, –101.72 ± 24.52‰ at the middle
is the true is the measured
is the measured stable isotope ratio of the is the measured stable isotope ratio of
210
lactation stage, and –101.51 ± 18.26‰ at the late lactation stage. The δ18O values in
211
milk samples were 17.31 ± 2.99‰ at the early lactation stage, 16.85 ± 2.77‰ at the
212
middle lactation stage, and 17.22 ± 2.68‰ at the late lactation stage. The δ13C, δ15N,
213
δ2H and δ18O values in milk samples from the three lactation stages showed no
214
significant differences according to a post hoc Duncan's test. Therefore, the lactation
215
stage was found to have no effect on the traceability of the milk samples.
216
3.2 Effects of sampling time on the isotope values
217
The (a) δ13C, (b) δ15N, (c) δ2H, and (d) δ18O values in milk samples at different
218
sampling time points from experiment 2 are shown in Table 1. Overall, the four stable
219
isotope ratios in milk from most provinces were different at variable sampling time
220
points. Compared to the δ2H and δ15N stable isotope ratios, the differences for the
221
δ13C and δ18O stable isotope ratios were greater at different sampling time points. For
222
example, the δ13C and δ18O stable isotope ratios in milk samples from Inner Mongolia
223
had significant differences at different sampling times (March, July and November),
224
while the δ2H and δ15N values showed little difference.
225
The δ13C values of milk samples from Hebei and Inner Mongolia sampled in
226
November were significantly higher than milk sampled in March and July (Table 1a).
227
The δ13C values of milk samples from Tianjin and Jiangsu were unchanged from July
228
to November. The δ15N values in milk samples from most provinces were also
229
different according to sampling time (Table 1b). The δ15N values of milk sampled in
230
July from Tianjin and Jiangsu were lower than milk sampled in March and November.
231
The δ2H values of milk from most provinces showed no obvious trends. This was
232
especially noticeable with milk samples from Tianjin (Table 1c). For the δ18O values,
233
milk samples from most provinces showed significant differences at different
234
collection times, with the δ18O values of milk sampled in July from most provinces
235
being higher than in November (Table 1d). Therefore, the traceability of milk was
236
found to be affected by sampling time effects.
237
3.3 Effects of geographic origin on the isotope values
238
Experiment 3 studied the effects of geographic origin on the traceability of milk.
239
Figure 3 shows the (a) δ13C, (b) δ15N, (c) δ2H, and (d) δ18O values of milk sample in
240
July from the eight dairy farms in experiment 2. The δ13C values of milk samples
241
from two dairy farms in Inner Mongolia were –29.42 ± 0.38 and –30.33 ± 0.64, which
242
were significantly lower than milk samples from Tianjin, Hebei, and Jiangsu (Fig. 3a).
243
The most positive δ13C values of milk were sampled from Tianjin and Hebei. The
244
δ15N values of milk samples from two dairy farms in Inner Mongolia were 5.57 ± 0.07
245
and 5.83 ± 0.18, which were significantly higher than milk samples from other
246
regions (Fig. 3b). The lowest δ15N values of milk were also sampled from Tianjin and
247
Hebei. There was no change in the δ2H values and δ18O values of milk samples from
248
different regions (Fig. 3c, d). The highest δ2H and δ18O values of milk were sampled
249
from two dairy farms in Tianjin.
250
3.4 Discriminant analysis results
251
Figure 4a shows the three-dimensional PLSDA of the four regions from July in
252
experiment 2. The cross-validation accuracy between these four regions was 92.11%.
253
Figure 4b shows the three-dimensional PLSDA of the four regions (Hebei, Ningxia,
254
Shaanxi, and Inner Mongolia) for the milk samples from experiment 1. The
255
cross-validation accuracy between these four regions was 71.55%. Not only was the
256
cross-validation accuracy calculated between provinces, but it was also determined
257
for different dairy farms in the same province (Table 2). The lowest cross-validation
258
accuracy (70%) was found for two farms in Inner Mongolia from experiment 2.
259
Figure 4c shows the three-dimensional PLSDA of the two farms in Hebei for milk
260
sampled from experiment 1. The cross-validation accuracy between the two farms in
261
Hebei was 100%. Three-dimensional PLSDA for milk sampled from the two farms in
262
each of the other provinces along with the stable isotopic data is given in Figures S2–
263
S8. These findings suggested that the discrimination of milk samples from two nearby
264
farms in the same region had satisfactory accuracy.
265
4. Discussion
266
In experiment 1, no significant change was found in the stable isotope ratios of
267
carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen, and oxygen of milk sampled in the early, middle, and late
268
lactation stages. Therefore, lactation stage may have no effect on the traceability of
269
milk when using light stable isotopes. This differs from a report showing that stable
270
isotope variations of milk can be associated with lactation stage (Magdas et al., 2013).
271
One reason for this difference may be the sampling times reported in the study was
272
different from those used in our experiments. In addition, cattle breed may also be
273
different. In a previous study, we also found that lactation stage had no effect on fatty
274
acid composition, vitamin A, and oxidative stability (Liang et al., 2017).
275
The impact of sampling time on the traceability of milk was also studied (experiment
276
2). The δ13C value in milk is highly dependent on diet composition—particularly with
277
regard to the proportion of C3 and C4 plants consumed (Garbariene et al., 2016;
278
Krivachy, Rossmann, & Schmidt, 2015; Nečemer, Potočnik, & Ogrinc, 2016;
279
Piliciauskas, Jankauskas, Piliciauskiene, & Dupras, 2017). Camin et al., (2008)
280
observed that changing a C3 diet to a C4 diet increased the δ13C value in milk. The
281
δ13C values of milk samples from Hebei and Inner Mongolia increased significantly
282
from July to November. This may be due to high rainfall and temperature in July,
283
which led to the growth of C3 grass, and cattle feed is mainly based on C3 grasses.
284
Subsequently, in November, maize is the main forage crop fed to cows in Hebei and
285
Inner Mongolia. Maize is a C4 plant that increases the δ13C value of milk. The δ13C
286
values of milk samples from Tianjin and Jiangsu remained constant from July to
287
November. This is likely due to the low summer rainfall experienced in the year of
288
sampling, which caused the cattle to be fed with supplementary feed of both C3
289
grasses (hay) and maize over this period. The δ15N values of milk samples from most
290
provinces increased significantly from July to November. This may be due to the fact
291
that in July, leguminous plants are the main fed to cows, leguminous plants are
292
nitrogen-fixing plants with low δ15N values (Sponheimer et al., 2003). Another
293
possible reason is that in November, cows urinate and defecate on the grass, which
294
then denitrifies, ensuring the grass has higher δ15N values. This is similar to the
295
change of δ15N in Korean organic milk with sampling time (Chung et al., 2018).
296
The δ2H, and δ18O values of milk reflect the input of drinking water, food, and
297
respiration (Hobson & Koehler, 2015). In July, δ18O values of milk in Jiangsu and
298
Inner Mongolia were higher than those in March and November. This may be because
299
most of the oxygen and hydrogen in milk is derived from drinking water. In warmer
300
temperatures, drinking water sources (ponds, streams or water troughs may become
301
evaporatively enriched (more positive δ18O and δ2H values) in July, or be sourced
302
from snow and glacier meltwater in the highlands which supplement the local
303
groundwater or rainfall. In general, there was no significant difference between the
304
δ2H values of milk samples collected in July and November except for those from
305
Hebei. Therefore, the δ2H values appear to be less sensitive to the influences of
306
sampling time. This may be the result of a change in the correlation between δ2H to
307
δ18O (Boner & Forstel, 2004). This correlation exists in the water (Dunbar & Wilson,
308
1983) and may be transmitted to the animal. Therefore, the sampling time can affect
309
the traceability of milk.
310
We studied the influence of geographic origin on the traceability of milk in
311
experiment 3. The δ13C values of milk sampled from Inner Mongolia were the lowest
312
as Inner Mongolia has large areas of C3 pasture available as the primary fodder
313
source. The other regions are better developed for agriculture, with more C4 plants
314
grown locally that are included in the feed, e.g., maize. These dietary composition
315
differences likeiy result in higher δ13C values in the milk samples from Ningxia,
316
Shaanxi and Hebei. These data agreed well with previous research on beef (Zhao,
317
Zhang, Chen, Chen, Yang, & Ye, 2013).The δ15N values for milk from two dairy
318
farms in Inner Mongolia are significantly higher than those in milk samples from
319
other regions. The lower δ15N values in samples from Tianjin and Hebei may be due
320
to chemical fertilizer application used to grow crops (the δ15N values of most
321
fertilizers are near 0 ‰), which are subsequently fed to the cows (Zhao, Zhang, Guo,
322
Wang, & Yang, 2016).
323
The δ2H and δ18O values of milk reflects the input of drinking water to the cow’s diet.
324
However, there is no regular change in the δ2H values and δ18O values of milk
325
sampled from different regions even though these isotopes are typically affected by
326
geographic location, altitude and distance from the ocean among other factors
327
(Bowen, Ehleringer, Chesson, Stange, & Cerling, 2007). Collectively, these results
328
may indicate that the hydrogen isotopic signature of milk is insufficient to provide an
329
unequivocal origin assignment. When tracing milk, multiple stable isotopes should be
330
considered, and should be combined with other chemo-specific analyses (Rutkowska,
331
Bialek, Adamska, & Zbikowska, 2015).
332
The cross-validation accuracy across the four regions from experiment 1 (71.55%) is
333
lower than that of the four regions from experiment 2 (92.11%). This may be because
334
the study sites (Shaanxi, Inner Mongolia, and Ningxia) from experiment 1 are
335
adjacent to each other and have similar crops and climate (Guo, Wei, Pan, & Li,
336
2010). Jiangsu, in experiment 2, is located in southern China, and its climatic
337
conditions are different from those of the other three provinces (Zhao et al., 2013).
338
The distance between each of the two farms from the four regions in experiment 1
339
were analyzed relative to cross-validation accuracy. The cross-validation accuracy is
340
positively correlated to the distance between the farms. The cross-validation accuracy
341
between the two farms in Ningxia is the lowest because the distance between these
342
two farms is the closest, and therefore harder to distinguish characteristic differences.
343
In addition, Ningxia is located in a pastoral region, and the animal feed at these two
344
farms is similar. The cross-validation accuracy between the two farms in Hebei is the
345
highest because the distance between these two farms is the furthest. Hebei is an
346
agricultural region, and each farm has significantly different feed formulations. The
347
feed in HB-TH is imported from other provinces and included silage, alfalfa, leymus
348
grass, and hay. The feed at HB-BH is a locally grown:imported ratio of 3:7. The
349
locally grown products included premixed feed, corn, soybean meal, other
350
miscellaneous meal, and bran. The imported feed included various straws. This
351
resulted in significantly different carbon and nitrogen isotope values in the milk from
352
these two farms and increased the cross-validation accuracy. The cross-validation
353
accuracy between the two farms in Hebei in experiment 2 was also high because of
354
the large distance between the two farms. Different feed formulations were also used
355
at the two farms in Jiangsu, which made the cross-validation accuracy between these
356
two farms higher than that between the two farms in Inner Mongolia although the
357
distance between the farms in Jiangsu was smaller than the farms in Inner Mongolia.
358
Thus, it is necessary to consider not only distance between farms, but also the feed
359
composition when using stable isotopes to trace milk. Overall, the feed together with
360
regional climatic differences play an influential role in the traceability of milk,
361
although it must be noted that feed differences may change annually according to feed
362
availability, price and faming practice.
363
5. Conclusion
364
Cow milk collected from various regions in China produced distinct isotopic
365
fingerprints confirming the potential of multi-element (C, N, H, O) stable isotope
366
analysis to trace the origin of milk. Characteristic stable isotope signatures for carbon,
367
nitrogen, hydrogen, and oxygen were used to differentiate the geographic origin of
368
milk from four provinces in China. Sampling time as well as geographic origin
369
influence the stable isotope ratios. The traceability of milk samples using
370
multi-element stable isotope ratio analysis within provinces and countrywide is
371
possible, meanwhile farming practices, feed composition and climatic factors should
372
also be considered.
373
374
Acknowledgement
375
This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of
376
China (2017YFC1601703).
377
References
378
Almeida, C. M., & Vasconcelos, M. T. S. D. (2001). ICP-MS determination of strontium isotope ratio in wine in order to be used as a fingerprint of its regional origin. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 16(6), 607-611. https://doi.org/10.1039/b100307k. Boner, M., & Forstel, H. (2004). Stable isotope variation as a tool to trace the authenticity of beef. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 378(2), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2347-6. Bostic, J. N., Hagopian, W. M., & Jahren, A. H. (2018). Carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes in U.S. milk: Insight into production process. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom, 32(7), 561-566. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8069. Bowen, G. J., Ehleringer, J. R., Chesson, L. A., Stange, E., & Cerling, T. E. (2007). Stable isotope ratios of tap water in the contiguous United States. Water Resources Research, 43(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006wr005186. Brand, W. A., Coplen, T. B., Vogl, J., Rosner, M., & Prohaska, T. (2014). Assessment of international reference materials for isotope-ratio analysis (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chemistry, 86(3), 425-467. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2013-1023. Cabanero, A. I., Recio, J. L., & Ruperez, M. (2006). Liquid chromatography coupled to isotope ratio mass spectrometry: A new perspective on honey adulteration detection. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54(26), 9719-9727. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf062067x. Camin, F., Perini, M., Colombari, G., Bontempo, L., & Versini, G. (2008). Influence of dietary composition on the carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and hydrogen stable isotope ratios of milk. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom, 22(11), 1690-1696. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.3506. Chung, I. M., Kim, J. K., Lee, K. J., Son, N. Y., An, M. J., Lee, J. H., . . . Kim, S. H. (2018). Discrimination of organic milk by stable isotope ratio, vitamin E, and fatty acid profiling combined with multivariate analysis: A case study of monthly and seasonal variation in Korea for 2016–2017. Food Chemistry, 261, 112-123. Coplen, T. B., Brand, W. A., Gehre, M., Gröning, M., Meijer, H. A., Toman, B., & Verkouteren, R. M. (2006). After two decades a second anchor for the VPDB δ13C scale. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry: An International Journal Devoted to the Rapid Dissemination of Up‐to‐the‐Minute Research in Mass Spectrometry, 20(21), 3165-3166. Dunbar, J., & Wilson, A. T. (1983). Oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in fruit and vegetable juices. Plant Physiology, 72(3), 725-727. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.72.3.725. Ehtesham, E., Hayman, A., Van Hale, R., & Frew, R. (2015). Influence of feed and water on the stable isotopic composition of dairy milk. International Dairy Journal, 47, 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2015.02.008. Garbaras, A., Skipityte, R., Meliaschenia, A., Senchenko, T., Smoliak, T., Ivanko,
379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419
420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463
M., . . . Remeikis, V. (2018). REGION DEPENDENT C-13,N-15,O-18 ISOTOPE RATIOS IN THE COW MILK. Lithuanian Journal of Physics, 58(3), 277-282.
://WOS:000450871700007. Garbariene, I., Sapolaite, J., Garbaras, A., Ezerinskis, Z., Pocevicius, M., Krikscikas, L., Plukis, A., & Remeikis, V. (2016). Origin Identification of Carbonaceous Aerosol Particles by Carbon Isotope Ratio Analysis. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 16(6), 1356-1365. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.07.0443. Guo, B. L., Wei, Y. M., Pan, J. R., & Li, Y. (2010). Stable C and N isotope ratio analysis for regional geographical traceability of cattle in China. Food Chemistry, 118(4), 915-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.062. Guyon, F., Auberger, P., Gaillard, L., Loublanches, C., Viateau, M., Sabathie, N., . . . Medina, B. (2014). C-13/C-12 isotope ratios of organic acids, glucose and fructose determined by HPLC-co-IRMS for lemon juices authenticity. Food Chemistry, 146, 36-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.020. Hobson, K. A., & Koehler, G. (2015). On the use of stable oxygen isotope (delta (18)O) measurements for tracking avian movements in North America. Ecol Evol, 5(3), 799-806. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1383. Krivachy, N., Rossmann, A., & Schmidt, H.-L. (2015). Potentials and caveats with oxygen and sulfur stable isotope analyses in authenticity and origin checks of food and food commodities. Food Control, 48, 143-150. Liang, K. H., Zhao, Y., Han, J., Liu, P., Qiu, J., Zhu, D. Z., . . . Wang, X. H. (2017). Fatty acid composition, vitamin A content and oxidative stability of milk in China. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1360186. Luo, D., Dong, H., Luo, H., Xian, Y., Guo, X., & Wu, Y. (2015). Multi-Element (C, N, H, O) Stable Isotope Ratio Analysis for Determining the Geographical Origin of Pure Milk from Different Regions. Food Analytical Methods, 9(2), 437-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0204-9. Lv, J., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Combined Stable Isotopes and Multi-element Analysis to Research the Difference Between Organic and Conventional Chicken. Food Analytical Methods, 10(2), 347-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-016-0588-1. Ma, H., Yang, H., Yang, S., Zhang, H., & Xiao, Z. (2017). Research progress of vegetable oil-based margarine. Food Research and Development, 38(13), 205-209. ://CABI:20173271350. Magdas, D. A., Cristea, G., Cordea, D. V., Bot, A., Puscas, R., Radu, S., . . . Mihaiu, M. (2013). Measurements of Stable Isotope Ratios in Milk Samples From a Farm Placed in the Mountains of Transylvania. In M. D. Lazar & S. Garabagiu (Eds.), Processes in Isotopes and Molecules (pp. 304-307). Nečemer, M., Potočnik, D., & Ogrinc, N. (2016). Discrimination between Slovenian cow, goat and sheep milk and cheese according to geographical origin using a combination of elemental content and stable isotope data. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 52, 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2016.07.002.
464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507
Oftedal, O. T. (1993). The adaptation of milk secretion to the constraints of fasting in bears, seals, and baleen whales. Journal of Dairy Science, 76(10), 3234-3246. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77660-2. Oftedal, O. T. (2008). Use of maternal reserves as a lactation strategy in large mammals. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 59(01), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665100000124. Paul, D., Skrzypek, G., & Forizs, I. (2007). Normalization of measured stable isotopic compositions to isotope reference scales - a review. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 21(18), 3006-3014. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.3185. Piliciauskas, G., Jankauskas, R., Piliciauskiene, G., & Dupras, T. (2017). Reconstructing Subneolithic and Neolithic diets of the inhabitants of the SE Baltic coast (3100-2500 cal BC) using stable isotope analysis. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 9(7), 1421-1437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-017-0463-z. Rossmann, A. (2001). Determination of Stable Isotope Ratios in Food Analysis. Food Reviews International, 17(3), 347-381. https://doi.org/10.1081/fri-100104704. Rutkowska, J., Bialek, M., Adamska, A., & Zbikowska, A. (2015). Differentiation of geographical origin of cream products in Poland according to their fatty acid profile. Food Chemistry, 178, 26-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.01.036. Schimmelmann, A., Albertino, A., Sauer, P. E., Qi, H., Molinie, R., & Mesnard, F. (2009). Nicotine, acetanilide and urea multi-level H-2-, C-13- and N-15-abundance reference materials for continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 23(22), 3513-3521. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.4277. Sponheimer, M., Robinson, T., Ayliffe, L., Roeder, B., Hammer, J., Passey, B., . . . Ehleringer, J. (2003). Nitrogen isotopes in mammalian herbivores: hair δ15N values from a controlled feeding study. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 13(1‐2), 80-87. Valenti, B., Biondi, L., Campidonico, L., Bontempo, L., Luciano, G., Di Paola, F., . . . Camin, F. (2017). Changes in stable isotope ratios in PDO cheese related to the area of production and green forage availability. The case study of Pecorino Siciliano. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 31(9), 737-744. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7840. Werner, R. A., & Brand, W. A. (2001). Referencing strategies and techniques in stable isotope ratio analysis. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 15(7), 501-519. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.258. Zhao, Y., Yang, S., & Wang, D. (2016). Stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes as a potential tool to differentiate pork from organic and conventional systems. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 96(11), 3950-3955. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7567. Zhao, Y., Zhang, B., Chen, G., Chen, A., Yang, S., & Ye, Z. (2013). Tracing the geographic origin of beef in China on the basis of the combination of stable isotopes and multielement analysis. J Agric Food Chem, 61(29), 7055-7060.
508 509 510 511 512 513
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf400947y. Zhao, Y., Zhang, B., Guo, B., Wang, D., & Yang, S. (2016). Combination of multi-element and stable isotope analysis improved the traceability of chicken from four provinces of China. Cyta-Journal of Food, 14(2), 163-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2015.1057235.
515 516
FIGURE CAPTIONS:
517
Fig. 1 Regional farm location information for milk samples from experiments 1 (a) and 2 (b).
518
Fig. 2 Values of (a) δ13C, (b) δ15N, (c) δ2H, and (d) δ18O of milk samples at different lactation
519
stages. Values are means ± SD. Means are not significantly different according to the post-hoc
520
Duncan's test.
521
Fig. 3 Values of (a) δ13C, (b) δ15N, (c) δ2H, and (d) δ18O of milk samples from the eight dairy
522
farms sampled in July. Values are means ± SD. Superscript letters are significantly (p < 0.05)
523
different with respect to the row for the eight farms (post-hoc Duncan's test, n = 5).
524
Fig. 4 Three-dimensional PLSDA of the four regions of milk samples from experiment 2 with
525
stable isotope data: Tianjin, Hebei, Jiangsu, Inner Mongolia (a); three-dimensional PLSDA of the
526
four regions of milk sampled from experiment 1 with stable isotope data: Hebei, Ningxia,
527
Shaanxi, Inner Mongolia (b); three-dimensional PLSDA of milk sampled from two farms in Hebei
528
from experiment 1 (c).
529
Figure 1
530
(a)
531 532
533
(b)
534
Figure 2
535
(a)
536 537
538
(b)
539
(c)
540 541 542
543
(d)
544
Figure 3
545
(a)
546 547
548
(b)
549
(c)
550 551
552
553
(d)
554
Figure 4
555
(a)
556 557 558
Cross-validation accuracy between the four regions is 92.11%. (b)
559 560
Cross-validation accuracy between the four regions is 71.55%.
561
562 563
(c)
Cross-validation accuracy between the two farms is 100%.
564
Table 1 Mean (a) δ13C, (b) δ15N, (c) δ2H, and (d) δ18O values and standard deviations of milk
565
samples. Numbers with different superscripts are significantly (p < 0.05) different with respect to
566
each row for the three sampling times: post-hoc Duncan's test (n=5).
567
(a) March
July
November
Location Mean (‰)
SD (‰)
Mean (‰)
SD (‰)
Mean (‰)
SD (‰)
TJ-NK
−18.95
0.45
−16.98
3.01
−17.27
0.60
TJ−FH
−17.75a
0.34
−16.56b
0.07
−16.72b
0.30
HB−LM
−21.61a
0.71
−20.10b
0.18
−19.04c
0.05
HB−ZL
−20.62a
0.66
−21.08a
0.55
−17.64b
0.27
JS−ZX
−22.60a
0.83
−20.86b
0.56
−21.64b
0.22
JS−DX
−23.32a
1.46
−21.33b
1.38
−20.94b
0.25
IM−LM
−27.37b
0.70
−29.42a
0.38
−25.71c
0.59
IM−XC
−22.65b
0.43
−30.33a
0.64
−21.20c
0.16
568 569
(b)
Location
March
July
November
Mean (‰)
SD (‰)
Mean (‰)
SD (‰)
Mean (‰)
SD (‰)
TJ−NK
4.22b
0.27
3.67a
0.14
4.14b
0.12
TJ−FH
4.13c
0.08
3.02a
0.16
3.89b
0.13
HB−LM
3.66
0.22
3.58
0.32
3.56
0.12
HB−ZL
3.27a
0.21
3.34a
0.39
4.21b
0.21
JS−ZX
5.25b
0.16
4.54a
0.36
5.18b
0.17
JS−DX
5.14b
0.60
4.47a
0.25
6.20b
0.33
IM−LM
5.18a
0.17
5.57a
0.07
6.62b
0.72
IM−XC
6.15b
0.26
5.83b
0.18
5.44a
0.35
571
(c)
Location
March
July
November
Mean (‰)
SD (‰)
Mean (‰)
SD (‰)
Mean (‰)
SD (‰)
TJ−NK
−63.81
6.29
−63.48
14.06
−73.32
3.08
TJ−FH
−65.67
7.74
−58.26
3.44
−65.80
3.90
HB−LM
−66.59b
2.94
−70.05ab
9.36
−77.26a
3.43
HB−ZL
−78.24a
4.11
−81.31a
4.26
−60.12b
9.28
JS−ZX
−61.82b
8.23
−78.28a
10.23
−81.37a
10.44
JS−DX
−74.20
18.98
−87.80
8.20
−86.53
8.67
IM−LM
−124.59a
10.49
−77.70b
23.56
−74.90b
18.14
IM−XC
−81.85
4.09
−99.08
8.92
−85.55
18.41
572 573
(d) March
July
November
Location
574 575
Mean (‰)
SD (‰)
Mean (‰)
SD (‰)
Mean (‰)
SD (‰)
TJ−NK
17.41
0.68
18.30
0.83
18.16
0.57
TJ−FH
17.07a
0.36
18.78b
0.23
18.99b
0.52
HB−LM
18.87b
0.63
18.41b
1.14
17.31a
0.40
HB−ZL
14.43b
0.93
13.26a
0.34
17.11c
1.05
JS−ZX
18.73c
0.33
14.83b
0.60
12.17a
0.80
JS−DX
12.71b
0.83
11.80b
1.10
9.45a
0.30
IM−LM
3.87a
0.63
15.77c
4.21
11.45b
0.34
IM−XC
10.18a
0.54
16.55c
1.11
11.58b
0.18
576
577
Table 2 Cross-validation accuracy between different farms from the same region. Different farms from the same region from
Different farms from the same region from
Experiment 1
Experiment 2
Region
Accuracy
Region
Accuracy
Hebei
100%
Tianjin
87.50%
Ningxia
71.43%
Hebei
100%
Shaanxi
86.67%
Jiangsu
90.00%
Inner Mongolia
86.67%
Inner Mongolia
70.00%