Applications of thermoanalytical methods to studies of flash smelting reactions

Applications of thermoanalytical methods to studies of flash smelting reactions

115 ThermochimicaAcfa, 85 (1985) 115-118 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam APPLICATIONS OF THERMOANALYTICAL -Printed METHODS in The Ne...

217KB Sizes 0 Downloads 44 Views

115

ThermochimicaAcfa, 85 (1985) 115-118 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam

APPLICATIONS

OF THERMOANALYTICAL

-Printed

METHODS

in The Netherlands

TO STUDIES OF FLASH SMELTING

REACTIONS

J C CbNN1 and S A A JAYAWEERA2 1 School of Applied Chemistry, liAIT, Kent St, Perth, Western Australia 2 Department of Environmental Sciences, Plymouth Polytechnic, Plymouth,

6132 Devon UK

A6STRACT DTA and TG techniques extents

of reaction

smelting

chosen.

concentrates ignition

from different

the ignition

concentrates

Under standardisad

temperatures

of about 20%.

sulphide

The values obtained

processes.

conditions

were used to measure

of nickel

were dependent

procedures,

properties

and indicated

and differences

These values are significant

and in flash

on the experimental

the thermal

sources were measured,

in the range 23-30°C

temperatures

used as feedstock

of

differences

in

in extent ofreaction

in terms of smelter

operations.

INTRODUCTION There are many examples eral sulphide

oxidation

ine the stepwise formed during ignition appears

oxidation

reaction.

reactions

in the literature

studies carried sequence

However,

in pyrotechnic

of the various mineral

although systems

ignition

reactions

of mineral

sulphides,

ref 1) of min-

designed

to exam-

phases present

or

DTA and TG have been used to study (2) and coal

to be the first in which the correct

trates typical

(see for example,

out under conditions

(3), this present

conditions

specifically

of those used in flash smelting

paper

are used to study the

nickel

sulphide

concen-

processes.

EXPERIF'IENTAL Nickel Western

sulphide

Australia

concentrates

pyrrhotile,

All DTA experiments

RESULTS

pentlandite

were performed

with a high temperature

used as an inert reference TG experiments

by the Kalgoorlie

and were tested as received.

present were pyrite,

equipped

were provided

The major

Nickel Smelter,

sulyhide

phases

and violarite.

using a DuPont 1090 Thermal

(1600°C) DTA cell.

Refractory

Analyser

alumina

was

material.

were performed

on a Stanton

Redcroft

TG 750 thermobalance.

AND DISCUSSION

DTA Investigations Figure 1 shows a DTA record of the same nickel

0040-6031/85/$03.30

0 Elsevier Science

Publishers

B.V.

sulphide

concentrate

heated

116 under different heating

experimental

rate of 10 degrees

atmosphere.

These conditions

phases present,

and oxidation

iron-nickel

not complete

Using the more vigorous a 15 mg sample,

producing

No further

The reaction

conditions

of a heating

and an oxygen atmosphere

was detected

be incorrect

from the non-ignition

the ignition

temperature

the ignition

DTA curve,

oxidation

(4)

is complex

the sulphide

over a temperature

per to ignite,

range of

record was also apparent.

sulphide

concentrate

to derive any information

since this is evidently phase which reaction.

of the ignition

temperature

DTA peak, which

had a value of 475°C.

under

on ignition

It would also be incorrect

as the first exothermic

on the ignition

rate of 20 degrees

(mid

experiment.

of a minor sulphide

icant effect

oxid-

scheme

by the DTA above 500°C.

DTA traces of the oxidation of nickel and non-ignition conditions.

It would obviously

air

of the individual

of the sequential

caused

of the temperature

TIME

Fig. 1. ignition

at a

until 800°C.

A perturbation

reaction

reaction

peaks are evidence

sulphides.

a very intense DTA peak which occurred

30°C (Figure 1).

actions

The lower trace was obtained

favour the stepwise

and the exothermic

ation of various

minute,

conditions.

per minute with 5 mg of sample and a flowing

deviation

from the baseline

the exothermic

Hence the only correct

had no signif-

interpretation

onset temperature

of the main

TG Investigations Thermogravimetric

studies on the oxidation

of nickel

in

peak from the

under these conditions

is the extrapolated

re-

to take

sulphide

concentrate

117 under ignition

and non-ignition

Under non-ignition iron and nickel and oxidative

conditions

sulphates

were evident

decomposition

itions, the sulphation

conditions significant

followed

of the remaining

reaction

over a much smaller temperature The thermobalance

have been previously weight

This technique

by heating

the furnace

determined

by the dynamic TG method

cond-

occurred

These characteristics

gain due to sulphation

enabled

in the sample crucible, before raising

could be used to determine

and

it around

the -1 min were

the ignition temperature,

below the ignition

temperature

and then raising the furnace around the

was repeated

Below the ignition

which

very fast heat-

rates of between 4000-5000°C

to a set temperature

This procedure

(See Figure 2).

(6).

temperature

that heating

attained.

sample.

and the oxidation

The sample was placed

to a specific

It was calculated

sample.

of

range and at a much lower temperature.

to be used in a novel manner which permitted

preheated

(5).

of sulphates

Under' ignition

used in this work has a small water cooled furnace

ing rates to be achieved. the furnace

by decomposition

sulphides.

was much reduced,

is raised around the sample on a cam shaft the thermobalance

reported

gains due to the formation

on fresh samples until ignition occurred temperature

but above the ignition

the only change was a weight

temperature

a very rapid weight

loss occurred.

I

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 2. 700i

n . ;

* 60

A MIXTURE

A

#

I3

TEMPERATURE TIME

(%I

(min)

Fig. 2. TG trace of the cxidation isothermal technique. Fig. 3. Extents temperature.

MIXTURE

of reaction

of nickel

for nickel

sulphide

sulphide

concentrates

concentrate

using an

as a function

of

118 Generally

the ignition

than those determined

temperatures

determined

by either conventional

were lower only by about 30 degrees at a maximum the 230 times

increase

has been reached

sufficient

rate have a relatively Some ignition in Table TABLE

in heating

rate.

by this approach

DTA or TG, although

and were not in proportion

This suggests

to cause ignition

were lower

the values

that once a heating

then further

increments

to rate

in heating

small effect.

temperature

values determined

by the three methods

are given

1.

1

Ignition

temperatures

determined

by thermoanalytical

methods.

Ignition Temperature

"C

Samole

I 1

DTA

Nickel Sulphide Concentrate

The weight

loss at any particular

extent of oxidation possible

475

weight

can be obtained

at that temperature.

extents

of reaction

various

air pre-heat

mixture

A is much more reactive

reaction

(

470

is directly

proportional

Hence by determining extent of reaction

temperatures.

nickel concentrates

to the

the maximum

against

These plots give an indication

for different

at 500°C compared

1 lsot;;rma’

500

temperature

loss, plots of percentage (see Figure 3).

TG

/

temperature

of relative

or concentrate

blends at

In the example shown, it is evident that the

than mixture

B, the former having achieved

with only 63% reaction

at the same temperature

85% for

the latter. CONCLUSION DTA and TG techniquescan ions to compare sulphide

the ignition

concentrates

be used under well controlled temperatures

and mixtures.

and extents

This information

standardised

of reactions

condit-

of nickel

is of value to efficient

flash smelter management. REFERENCES 1 2 3 4

65

E.#. Bollin, Chalcogenides, in R.C. Mackenzie (Ed.), Differential Thermal Analysis, Vol 1, Academic Press, London, 1970, Chapter 7. E.L. Charsley and Chieh-Hua Chen, Thermochim. Acta, 35 (1980) 141. L.S. flerril, Fuel, 52 (1973) 61. J.G. Dunn and C.S. Kelly, J Therm. Anal., 18 (1980) 147. J.C. Dunn and S.A.A. Jayweera, Thermochim Acta, 61 (1983) 313. E.L. Charsley and A.C.F. Kamp, J. Therm. Anal., 7 (1975) 173.