MATHEMATICAL COMPUTER MODELLING Mathematrcal and Computer Modelhng 34 (2001) %18
PERGAMON
www elsevier nl/locate/mcm
Approximations for Fixed Points of $-Hemicontractive Mappings by the Ishikawa Iterative Process with Mixed Errors Department
YEOL JE CHO* of Mathematics, Gyeongsang National Umverslty GhinJu 660-701, Korea
HAIYUN ZHOU Department of Mathematics, Shrlmzhuang Mechamcal Engmeermg College Shrlrazhuang 050003, P R Chma SHIN MIN KANG* Department of Mathematics, Gyeongsang National Unrversrty Chinlu 660-701, Korea SEONG SIK KIM Department of Mathematms, Dongeur Umversrty Pusan 614-714, Korea (Recezved and accepted July 2000)
Abstract-Let X be a real uniformly smooth Banach space, K be a nonempty closed convex subset of X and T K + K be a generalized Lrpschrtzranand hemrcontractrvemapping It ISshown that the Ishlkawa iterative process with mrxed errors converges strongly to the unique fixed pomt of the mapping T As consequences, several new strong convergence results are deduced and some known results are improved @ 2001 Elsevrer Science Ltd All rrghts reserved Keywords-Bemrcontractron,
Generalized Lrpschrtzrancondltron, Ishrkawaiterative process with
mlxed errors
1. INTRODUCTION Let X be a real Banach space with norm )I dualaty mappzng J X 4 2x’ IS defined by
J(x) =
{xc* E x*
AND
PRELIMINARIES
11and X* be the dual space of X (2,x*)
The normalzzed
= lbl12= b*ll”> 9
for all z E X, where ( , ) denotes the generahzed duality palrmg It 1s well known that, If X 1s uniformly smooth, then J 1s single-valued and J(h) = tJz for all t > 0 and z E X and J normalized 1s uniformly contmuous on bounded subsets of X [1,2] We denote the single-valued duality mapping by 3 *The first and third authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the Korea Research Foundation (KRF-99-005-D00003) 0895-7177/01/t - see front matter @ 2001 Elsevler Science Ltd PI1 SO895-7177(01)00044-9
All rights reserved
Typeset
by &&Tj$
Grant
10
Y
J CHO et al
An operator T with domain D(T) and range R(T) m X 1s said to be generalazed Lzpschztzzan If there exists a constant c > 0 such that lITa:- Tyll 5 for every 2, y E D(T)
~(1+ 112 - Ylt),
(1 1)
Without loss of generahty, we may assume that c > 1
We remark lmmedlately that, if T either 1s Llpschltzlan or has bounded range, then It 1s generahzed Llpschltzlan
On the other hand, m general, every generalized Llpschltzlan operator
neither 1s Llpschltzlan nor has the bounded range
For example, let X = (--00, t-co) and T
X + X be defined by lf 2 E (--00,-l), TX =
x - d_,
lf x E (-co,O),
x + d_,
lf x E [O,11, lf J: E (l,oo)
Clearly T 1s generalized Llpschltzlan, but T IS not Llpschltzlan and Its range 1s not bounded An operator T IS said to be accretzwe If, for every x, y E D(T), there exists 3(x - y) E J(x - y) such that (Ta: - TY,&
- Y)) 2 0
The operator T 1s said to be strongly accretzve if, for every x,y E D(T),
(1 2) there exist 3(x - y) E
J(a: - y) and a posltlve constant Ic such that, (TX - Ty,&
- y)) 2 ktb - Yii2
(13)
Without loss of generality, we may assume that k E (0,l) The operator T ISsaid to be &strongly accretzwe if, for every x, y E D(T), there exist 3(x-y) J(x - y) and a strictly increasing function #J [0, m) + [0, co) with r$(O) = 0 such that (TX - Ty,~(x - y)) > 4(11X- Y~~)~b- YII
E
(1 4)
Let N(T) = {x E X TX = 0) If N(T) # 0 and inequalities (1 2)-(1 4) hold for any x E D(T) and y E N(T), then the correspondmg operator T 1s called quasz-accretzve, strongly quaszaccretzve, and &strongly quasz-accretzve, respectively TX = x} A mappmg T D(T) c X -+ X 1s said to be a &hemLet F(T) = {x E D(T) contractwe If (I - T) 1s $-strongly quasi-accretlve, where I is the ldentlty mapping on X It IS very clear that, if T 1s &hemlcontractlve, then F(T) # 0 and, for all x E D(T) and y E F(T), there exist 3(x-y) E J(x - y) and a strictly increasing function 4 [0, m) + [0, co) with 4(O) = 0 such that (TX - Q/,3(x
- Y)) I
lb - ~11~- 4(11x - ~ll>llx - YII
(1 5)
These operators have been extensively studled and used by several authors (see [3-111) In [12,13], Lm and Xu introduced the Ishlkawa iterative schemes with errors, respectively, but note that Xu’s schemes with errors 1s a special case of Lm’s scheme with errors These operators have been also extensively studled and used by several authors (see [5,12-151) Recently, Zhou and Jla [ll] proved that the Ishlkawa iterative process converges strongly to the unique fixed point of a strong pseudo-contractlve mappmg without Llpschltz assumption m a real umformly smooth Banach space More recently, Huang [5] attempted to extend the mam results of [11,16] to the more general classes of &hemlcontractlve mappmgs and $-strongly qusslaccretlve operators, and the more general iterative process with errors Unfortunately, the proof of Theorem 1 m [5] contams a gap, 1 e , there 1s something wrong m the estlmatlon (12) of [5] Moreover, the contmulty assumption on T imposed m [5] will not be necessary
Approxrmationsfor FrxedPomts
11
It 1s our purpose m thus paper to correct, umfy, and improve the results above mentroned by using our new Ishrkawa rteratrve scheme (IS) 1 with mrxed errors defined m our mam Theorem 2 1 For this purpose, we need to introduce the followmg lemmas LEMMA 1 1 (See [12] ) Let {a,}~&,, satisfymg the followmg condition
with
o5
t,
LEMMA 1 2 satisfying
2 1,
{bn}~&,
and {~}~=c
be three nonnegative real sequences
Cr=, t, = m, b, = o(t,), and Cr=e c, < 00 Then a, + 0 as n -+ ~0
Let {pn}Eo,
{a,}Ze,
pn+1
with An E [O,l), C:=,
I
(1
-
{rn)Ec, A,
+
%)Pn
and {o(X~)%I +
4hJ
+
X, = oo, Cr’_‘=, cm -C 00, and Cr=,
rn>
b e nonnegative real sequences n
2
0,
r,, < 00 Then pn -+ 0 as n + co
{pn} = p Then p = 0 If rt 1s not the case, assume that p > 0 Then PROOF Let hmmf,,, we have pn 2 (l/2) p > 0 for sufficiently large positive integer n Hence, by usmg the fact that 0(X,) 5 X,p,, rt follows that
for sufficrently large n, whrch rmphes that llm,,W formula pn 5 (1 + a,)~,
pn exists, m fact, by virtue of the recursive
+ r,, rt follows that
for all posrtrve integers m,n
Therefore, for any fixed n 2 0, we have
and so
Thus, l~m,+oo pn exists, where we used the facts that
12
J CHOet al
Y
and
( )I M
_hm exp 71+03 [ because exp( C,“=,, Us) --) 1 as n -+ 00 {p,} It follows that
Pn = b Pn ?l-+*
C u3 j=7&
Thus, the sequence {P,},“,~
IS bounded
Set M =
sup+,,-
Pnfl
for very large n, where T, = Ma,
I
(1
-
+ T,
hL)Pn
+
7,
+4&t),
(1
6)
It follows from (1 6) and Lemma 1 1 that pn -+ 0 as
n + 00, which 1s a contradlctlon Hence, there exists a subsequence {pn,}yCO of {P~}?=~ such that pn, ---f 0 as 3 + 00 Since pn, -+ 0, Cp=‘=, a, < 00, and C,“=, T, < 00, it follows that for all c > 0, there exists nJ 2 0 such that
for all n 2 nJ By mductlon, we obtam
for all m 2 0, which shows that prL-+ 0 as n -+ 0;) This completes the proof
2. THE
MAIN
Now we prove the mam results of this paper uniformly smooth Banach space
RESULTS
In the sequel, we always assume that X 1s a real
THEOREM 2 1 Let K be a nonempty convex subset of X and T Llpschltzlan and &hemlcontractlve mapping with the property
hmmf i@ t-+m t Let q be a fixed pomt of T m K
Let {a,}~=,
K 4
K be a generalized
> 0
(2 1) be two real sequences m [0, I]
and {&}rZo
satlsfymg the followmg condltlons (1) an, A 4Oasn+co, (11) c,“=, WI = 00 Assume that {u~},“,~ (111)
u,
=
uk
+
U: = ~(a,),
ug
and {u~},“,~
are two sequences m K such that
for any sequences {u~}~=~ and {u~}~=~ m K satlsfymg C,“=, and ((TJ,[~ --f 0 as n --+ 00
lluill < 00,
Suppose that a sequence {x~}~=~ m K can be defined by xor~o,~o E K, x,+1 = (I-
a&n
+ a,Ty,
yn = (I-
P&n
+ PnTxn + 2m,
Then the sequence {x~}~!~
+ un,
(191
n20
converges strongly to the unique fixed point of T
PROOF By the definition of T, we know that, if F(T) Let q E K denote the unique fixed point Set
II(
Yn 4 l+~~x,-q~~
An=3
x,+1
%=
12 L 0,
II3
(
-
>
-3
>
-3
# 0, then F(T)
(
4
1 + 11%- QllIll ’ Yn - 4
Q
1+~~x,-q~~
xn -
(
1+
11%- QllIll
must be a smgleton
Approxlmatlons
13
for Flxed Points
Without loss of generahty, we assume that IJunI(,11~~~11 I 1 for all n 2 0 Observe that II~G
- qll
1f 11%-
IlTyn
< c
qll -
411<
-
c(2 + c),
1 + II% - qll -
’
and 11zn+1- qi’ < c(2 + c) + 1 IlGl - qll -
1+
It IS easily
seen
that, m view of the uniform contmmty of J on any bounded subset of X, A,,
B, + 0 as n -+ 00 It follows from (IS)1 and lIyn I(yn - q1125 (1 - Pn)ll~
- qllllyn
411 I (l/2)
- qll + PnPn
(1 + llyn - 411’) that
- q,dyn
- q)) + ll~nllll~n
-
411
I (1 - Pn)llGz- qllllyn- 41+ PnCk - q>.dzn - 4)
-
xn -
Yn Q 1 + IJxn- qll
Q
1+ II% - qll )>
(2 2)
x (1 + ((XT& - qllj2 + f ll%ll (1 + IlYn - ql12) I
f (1 - P,)’
1
+ Pn + ‘h&P,
[
2Pd#J(lI%
- qll)llGz
which lmphes that
cdl2 I
IlYn +4cAnPn
llx,
- ql12 + ; (I+
- qll + 2&A
+ f 11~11,
1+ (A + 4&&3n
+ lbnll
- 2Pnd(ll~z
- qli2
cdl2
IIGL -
1 - Ibnll
ll~ll)li~n
- qll)lh
(2 3)
- qll
1 - ll~nll It follows from (IS)1 that
lbn+l -
qlj2 < (1 - cy,)IIx,
I
(1 - %>ll%
5 (1 +%I
%-Jllxn
- qIIIIx:n+l
- qll + an(Tyn
- q,hCn+l
- qllllx,+1
- qll + an(Tyn
- q,.dyn
- QIIII~n+l
- qll + WI (IIYn - ql12 - dllvn
Tyn-q 1 + llxn - qll 73
- q)) + ll~nllllx~+1 - 4)) + f
G&+1 - Q
llwzll (I+ lb - ql12>
- QII)IIYYn - 411)
Yn - Q
1 + llxn - qll
- qll
1 + II% -
Qll)>
x (1+ II&l - ql12> + ; Ibnll (1 + lb%+1 - !7112)
I ; ((1- QrJ211&l - 4112+ + Qn(IlYn
- ql12 - HIIYn
+ ~(2 + +Gn <
(
(I+
; (1 - Q2
llGL+1 - qll>llvn
11~ - ql12) + ; lbnll
+ 242 + c)B,a,)
II%+1
+ f IMI)
Thus, transferrmg the term (l/2 11xn
+ lbnll
+ 2%
+1
-
-
4112 +
(I+
llxn+l
- ql12)
)1x, - c/II2 - qll) 242
+ (1/2)ll~~~~)~l2~+~ ql12 <
(2 4)
- 411)
+ % (IlYn - ql12 - @(llYn - qll)llvn + (;
ql12>
+
m&z
+
;
ll’11nll
- q)12, we have
l - I1- 4c(2 + c)BQlan (lxn
_
ql12
1 - 0~~11
(llvn - ql12 - d(llvn
- qll>llyn
1 - Ibnll
- qll) + 4c(2 + c)anB,
(2 5)
14
Y
J CHO et al
Now we consider the followmg possible cases +coasn--+oo (1) IlYn - 411
In this case, we must have that (12, - 411+ 0;) as n ---t 00 By property (2 l), we have hrn mf MlYn n+w [(&-q/1
and
all) =7>o
hmmf WI% - qll) n-+03 IIxcn-qll =w>o
Thus, we can choose no so large that
44IG - 411)> Au II% - Qll
- 2
’
4(IIYn - 41) > 1 ~ IlYn - 411 - 2 ’
P, + 4cA, I w, 4c(2 + c)& I r/2, and 11~~11/1- ll~~ll 5 (~/G)c11, for all n 2 no Substltutmg these estlmatlons mto (2 3) and (2 4) yields that
Q, Il.& - ql(2+ 1$& II%+1 - 4112 5 l -1 _(7/2) ((u,(( 2 (1 - 5 an+ ~m4I)
+ 4%)
II&I - 4112+ Mll4J
(2 6) + 44,
for all 1x1> no, where l/(1 - ll~nll) 5 M, which implies that z, -+ q as n + w by virtue of Lemma 1 2 This contradicts the assumption that llyn - 411-+ co as n + co
(11)There
exists a subsequence {yn,}~=o of {Y,},“,~ such that {y,,}r?_o 1s bounded In this case, by mductlon, we can prove that {Y~}?=~, and hence, {x~}:.~ 1s a bounded Smce T 1s generalized Llpschltzlan and T 1s bounded, it follows that both sequence {TxCn}FCo and {TY,}~_~ are bounded Usmg a slmllar argument to (I), we have
II%+1 - 4112I Let lim mfn_oo
Ih -
4112- 2%dllYn
- c7ll)llYn -
411 + WI411+ 4%)
(27)
((yn - q(( = 6 Then 6 = 0 If It 1s not the case, we assume that 6 > 0
Then there exists a posltlve constant n1 such that 11~~- 4112 b/2 for all n 2 nl and so dllvn - 4) 2 4(~/2) Th us, we can choose n2 so large that o(%J 5 4 4
0
;
Qn,
for all 722 722 Let ns = max {nl, 722) It follows from (2 7) that
II%+1 - 41125
II% - 4112 - f 4) f 0
an+ Wldll,
(2 8)
for all n 2 ns, which lmphes that $$)
2
% I II%, - 4112+ A!I 5
71=7X3
11411 < a, 71=7&s
(2 9)
which 1s a contradlctlon
and so 6 = 0 Consequently, there exists an mfimte subsequence { yn, },oO=,such that yn, + q as J --f co and so there exists an mfimte subsequence {x~,}~& such that xn, --) q as J --+ 03 By mductlon, we can prove that 5, -+ q as n -+ co This completes the proof Note that the sequence {x,}F=,, defined by (IS)l, Ishzkawa ateratave process wath maxed errors
satlsfymg Condltlon
(111) 1s called the
REMARK 2 1 Theorem 2 1 extends Theorem 3 2 of Chang et al [3] and Theorem 2 of Zhou [IG] to the more general class of operators and lteratlon processes with mixed errors
As a direct consequence of Theorem 2 1, we have the followmg
Approxlmatlonsfor FutedPoints
15
COROLLARY 2 1 Let X, K, and T be as m Theorem 2 1 Let {?J~}$&, sequences m K and {a,}$?&,, {b,}r& {c,}~&, m (0,l) satlsfymg the following condltlons
{ai}?=,,,
{b~}~&,,
{w~}~=~ be bounded
{c~}~=~
be real sequences
(1) a, + b, + c, = 1 = a:, + b:, + CL, n 2 0, (4 b,, b;, c:,-+Oasn+CQ, (111) c:lJ b, = CQ,
bv) cz,
% < 00 lteratlvely by
Define a sequence {x~}:!~
xor uo, 00 E K, x12+1 = anxn + LTy, yn = ahxn + b;Tx, Then the sequence {z~}:.~
+ Gun,
n L 0,
+ c’7L v 7%)
n>O
(IS)2
IS well defined and converges strongly to the umque fixed pomt of T
PROOF
It 1s clear that the sequence {x~}:=~
and T
K +
K 1s a self-mapping
defined by (IS) 2 1s well defined since I< 1s convex
Set (Y, = b, + c, and & = bk + CL Then the recursive
formula (IS)2 becomes %+I
in
(1 - %)Xn + anTYn - ~n(Tyn - un), = (l- Pn)xn + PnTxn - &(Txn - ~1,
n 2 0,
=
n>O
Under the assumptions of Corollary 2 1, we can prove that the sequence {x~}:=~ defined by (IS)2 1s bounded, and hence, {Tx~}~~~ and {Tyn}~Co are all bounded Thus, the conclusion of Corollary 2 1 follows from Theorem 2 1 This completes the proof THEOREM 2 2 Let T X + X be a generahzed Llpschltnan and &strongly quasi-accretlve operator with property (2 1) Let x* be a solution of the equation TX = 0 Define a mappmg S X + X by Ss = z - TX for all x E X satlsfymg the followmg condltlons
Let {a,}?=,
and {Pn}zZo
be two reaJ sequences m [0, l]
(1) %7 & ~Oa.sn-+oa, (11) cz, Q, = 00 Assume that {u~}F.~ and {D~}:=~ are two sequences In X such that u, = uk + u: for any sequences {uk}F!o and {uC}FZo in X satlsfymg cr=o Ilukll < 00, ZJ~= o(cr,), and llwnll + 0 as n -+ co For arbitrary 20 E X, define a sequence {xCn}rEo m X by %+1
=
(I-
Yn = (IThen the sequence {x,}~!~
%I)%
+
ansyn
+
f&L,
Pn)GL + PnSxn + %I,
n
2
0,
n>O
(1%
converges strongly to the umque solution x* of the equation TX = 0
PROOF We observe first that, if the equation TX = 0 has a solution x* E X, then the solution x* 1s unique since T X + X 1s &strongly quasi-accretlve By the definition of S, we have
(Sx - SY,.T(X - Y/)) I lb - Yl12 - $(IIx - Yll)llX - Yll,
(2 10)
for every x E X and y E N(T)
We observe also that T is generalized Llpschltzlan lmphes that S
1s also generahzed Llpschltzlan
Consequently, there exists a fixed positive constant c such that IlSx - SYII 5 41 + 112- Yll>l
(2 11)
for all x, y E X Therefore, the conclusion of Theorem 2 2 follows exactly from Theorem 2 1 This completes the proof From Theorem 2 2, we have the followmg
Y J CHOet al
16
COROLLARY 2 2
Let X, T, and S be as m Theorem 2 2
sequences m X and {a,}?&, {bn}r=O, {c,}F=,, m (0,l) satlsfymg the followmg condltlons
{a~}~&,,
Let {~~}n”,,,,
{wn}rZO
{bL),“==,, {c~}~!~
be bounded
be real sequences
(1) a, + b, + c, = 1 = u:, + b:, + CL, n 2 0, (11) b,, b6, CL -+ 0 as n 4 03, (4 C:, (1v) cz”=,
b, = 00, c?l < 03
Define a sequence
{~c,}~~“=on.?eratlvely by 20,~0,~0 x,+1 = anx,
+ My,
yn = abxcn + b;Sx, Then the sequence {x~},“,~ PROOF
E X7 + cn~n,
11 2 0,
+ c:v,,
n>O
(1%
converges strongly to the unique solution of the equation Ts = 0
Set cy, = b, + c, and &, = bk + CL Then the recursive formula (IS)4 becomes Xn+l
=
(1 -
yin = (1 -
+
%SYn
- Cn(SYn - WI),
n 2 0,
Pn)Gl +
PnSxn
- c;(s%
n>O
%-Jxn
- VJ,
Under the assumptions of Corollary 2 2, we can prove that the sequence {xCn}rYo defined by (Is)4 1s bounded, and hence, {SX,}~=~ and {SY,}~=~ lary 2 2 follows from Theorem 2 2
are all bounded
Thus, the conclusion of Corol-
REMARK 2 2 Theorem 2 2 extends Theorem 5 2 of [3] and Theorem 1 of [16] to the more general class of operators and iteration process with mixed errors An accretlve operator T with domain D(T) and range R(T) m X 1s said to be m-accretzwe if the range of the operator (I + XT) 1s whole space X for some posltlve constant X Recently, m [17], Zhou gave some results on the approxlmatlon methods for nonhnear operator equations of the m-accretlve type Applymg Theorem 2 2 to an m-accretlve operator, we have the followmg important result THEOREM 2 3 Let T X + X be a generalized Llpschltzlan and m-accretlve operator For any given f E X, let x* be a solution of the equation x + TX = f Let {cxn}rZo and {/?n}~=o be two real sequences m [0, l] satlsfymg the followmg condltlons (1) ok, @?I-+Oasn-+c~, (11) c,“=, a, = 00 Assume
that
{~,}p=,
and {un}rCo
are two sequences
m X such that u,
= ZL~+ ZL~ for any
sequences {z&}~=~ and {u~}~=~ m X satrsfymg C,“=, 111&11< co, U: = ~(a,), as n + w For arbitrary 50 E X, define a sequence {x~}~=~ m X by x,+1 = (Iin = Cl-
Then the sequence
{x,}~=~
GJ~,
+ a,(f
- TY~) + u,,
n > 0,
Pnh
+ PnLf
- %d
n20
converges strongly
+ G,
to the unique solutlon
and [l~~ll -+ 0
of the equation
(IS):,
x + Ts = f
PROOF Define a mapping A X + X by Ax = x + TX for each x E X Then A IS a genelahzed Llpschltzlan and strongly accretlve operator, and hence, A satisfies all assumptions of Theorem 2 2 Thus, the conclusion of Theorem 2 3 follows from Theorem 2 2 COROLLARY 2 3 Let X, T, and S be as m Theorem 2 3 Let {zL,}~=~, {‘u,}:.~ be bounded sequences m X and let {a,}rTo, {bn}rZo, {c~}?!~, {a~}~Co, {b~}~Co, {cL}~?~ be real sequences m (0,l) satlsfymg the followmg condltlons (1) a, + b, + c, = 1 = u; + 6; + CL, n > 0, (11) b,, b;, c~+Oasn+co, (111)rEzo (14 CZ,
b, = a> c,
Approximations
Define the sequence {z,}~=~
lteratlvely
17
for Fixed Points
by 50, ‘1L0,vo E x,
%+1
= &l%
y,, = a;x, Then the sequence {z,}~=~ REMARK
general
2 3 Theorem class of operators
THEOREM
{~,}Eo
m terms 2 4
and {A)%
+ cn%%,
12 L 0,
+ c;v,,
n20
+ b;Sx,
converges strongly to the urnque solution
If and only if -T
of dlsslpatlve Let T
MY,
2 3 extends Theorem and iteration process
Since T 1s m-accretlve restated
+
operators
(1%
of the equation
5 of [18] and Corollary with mixed errors
1s m-dlsslpatlve,
the result
z + Tz = f
3 1 of [14] to the more of Theorem
2 3 can be
x - XTx = f, where X > 0
for the equation
X + X be a generalized Llpschltzlan e b t wo real sequences m [0, l] sat@mg
and m-dlsslpatlve operator the followmg condltlons
Let
(1) ok, Pn -+Oasn-+oo, (11) Ix,“=, % = cfJ Assume that {un}rZo
and {v~}~=~ are two sequences
III
X such that un = uil + U: for any
sequences {u;},“=~ and {u~}$!!~ m X satlsfymg Cr=, /1z&j[ < co, U: = ~(a,), and l/v,)1 + 0 as n -+ co For any given f E X and X > 0, define a mappmg S X + X by Sx = f + XTx for each z E X For arbitrary x0 E X, define a sequence {x,}~~, m X by X n+1 = 0
- @%I
Yn = (1 - P&n Then the sequence
{x,}~=,
converges
strongly
+
%ZSY, + %,
+ P&,
+ %,
n > 0, (IS)7
n20
to the unique solutlon
of the equation
x-XTx
= f
PROOF The existence of a solution follows from the m-dlsapatlvlty of T Observe that (-XT) 1s a generalized Llpschltzlan and m-accretlve operator Thus, the conclusion of Theorem 2 4 now follows from Theorem 2 3
REFERENCES
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
F E Browder, Nonlinear operators and nonhnear equations of evolution m Banach spaces, Proc Sympos Pure Math 18, (1976) V Barbu, Nonlanear Semzgroups and Dafferentaal Equataons an Banach Spaces, Noordhoff Int , Leyden, The Netherlands, (1976) S S Chang, Y J Cho, B S Lee, J S Jung and S M Kang, Iterative approximations of fixed points and solutions for strongly accretlve and strongly pseudo-contractlve mappmgs m Banach spaces, J Math Anal Appl 224, 149-165, (1998) K Deimhng, Zeros of accretlve operators, Manuscrzppta Math 13, 365-374, (1974) Z Y Huang, Approximating fixed points of $-hermcontractive mappmgs by the Ishikawa lteratlon process with errors m uniformly smooth Banach spaces, Computers Math Applzc 36 (2), 13-21, (1998) M 0 Oslhke, Iterative solution of nonlinear equations of the @strongly accretive type, J Math Anal Appl 200, 259-271, (1996) S Reich, An iterative procedure for constructmg zeros of accretive operators m Banach spaces, No&near Analyszs 2, 85-92, (1978) S Reich, Strongly convergence theorems for resolvents of accretlve operators in Banach spaces, J Math Anal Appl 75, 287-292, (1980) H Y Zhou, Y J Cho and S M Kang, Characteristic con&tons for convergence of generahzed steepest descent approximation to multivalued accretive operator equations, Computers Math Applzc 39 (3/4), l-11, (2000) H Y Zhou and Y T .ha, Approximatmg the zeros of accretlve operators by the IsIukawa lteratlon process, Abstr Appl Anal 1 (2), 153-167, (1996) H Y Zhou and Y T Jla, Approximation of fixed pomts of strongly pseudocntractlve maps without Llpschltz assumption, Proc Amer Math Sot 125, 1705-1709, (1997) L S Lm, Ishlkawa and Mann lteratlon process with errors for nonhnear strongly accretlve mappmgs m Banach spaces, J Math Anal Appl 194, 114-125, (1995) Y G Xu, Ishikawa and Mann lteratlve processes with errors for nonhnear strongly accretlve operator equatlons, J Math Anal Appl 224, 91-101, (1998)
18
Y
J CHO et al
14 X P Dmg, Iterative process with errors of no&near equations mvolvmg m-accretlve opelators, J Math Anal Appl 191, 197-201, (1997) 15 H Y Zhou, Ishlkawa iterative process with errors for Llpschrtzlan and #-hemlcontractlve mappmgs m normed linear spaces, PanAmer Math J 9 (3), 65-77, (1999) 16 H Y Zhou, Iterative solution of nonlinear equations involving strongly accretive operators without Llpschltz assumption, J fiath Anal Appl 213, 296-307, (1997) 17 H Y Zhou, Remarks on the approxlmatlon methods for nonhnear operator equations of the m-accretlve type, No&near Analyszs (to appear) 18 C E Chldume and M 0 Oslllke, Approxlmatlon methods for nonlinear operator equations of the m-ilccretive type, J Math Anal Appl 189, 225-239, (1995)