ARGUS results on antideuteron production

ARGUS results on antideuteron production

Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.) 16 (1990) 314-316 North-Holland 314 ARGUS RESULTS ON ANTIDEUTERON PRODUCTION A. Lindner$ Institut für Physik der Un...

288KB Sizes 0 Downloads 66 Views

Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.) 16 (1990) 314-316 North-Holland

314

ARGUS RESULTS ON ANTIDEUTERON PRODUCTION A. Lindner$ Institut für Physik der Universität Dortmund, Federal Republic of Germany Using the ARGUS detector at the DORIS II storage ring we have studied the production of antideuterons in e+eannihilation at centre-of-mass energies around 10 GeV. From 21 events containing d candidates we determined fd the inclusive cross section 1/Qd - da/dp and the production rate in direct hadronic T(1S),T(2S) decays, which was measured to be (6.0 f 2.0 t 0.6) - 10-s d per event while in the continuum e+e- --+ qq only an upper limit of 1.7 - 10-5 d per event (90% CL) could be obtained . Comparisons with a simple model and other ARGUS measurements hint at the underlaymg production mechanism of antideuterons. In the region of 10 GeV centre-of-mass energy fragmentation processes can be studied in the gluon me-

continuum. In this analysis the search was restricted to

continuum reactions, where a primary quark antiquark

wall interactions. To find d we made use of the particle

analyzing meson and baryon production3-4. One exci-

momentum and energy loss measurements in the main

hancment of baryons in the gluonic decays of the T(1S)

deposited energy in the electromagnetic calorimeter . To

d, since in spite of an effective event selection, deute-

diated direct hadronic decays of T resonances and in

rons still suffer contamination from beam gas and beam

pair is produced .

This has been done extensively by

identification capabilities of the detector provided by the

ting result which was first observed in 1981 5 is the en-

drift chamber, the time-of-flight measurement, and the

and T(2S) resonances as compared to their production

ensure a good identification a momentum less than 1.7

the production rate in direct hadronic T(15),T(2S) de-

distributions of energy loss and time-of-flight measure-

in continuum events . While r (defined as the ratio of cays to the rate in continuum events) for mesons l,2 has been measured to be around 1.1, barynns3 have a value

GeV/c for d candidates was required . The expected

ments as well as the remaining background were deter-

mined from data . Further details of the analysis can be

of r in the range of 2 to 3.

found in reference8 .

terons in e+e- annihilation was published by ARGUS in

ning a d candidate, which consist of 12 events from

based on a much larger data sample and puts emphasis

events taken at the centre-of-mass energy of the T(4S).

The first and up to now only observation of antideu1985 6. Here I report on a more detailed study which is

on the differences between the production in direct ha-

After all cuts we are left with 21 events each contaidata on the T(1S), 7 events from the T(2S), and 2 No candidate was found in the continuum data . The

dronic decays of the T(1S) and T(2S) resonances and

two events recorded at the T(4S) energy are kinemati-

in the nearby qq continuum .

cally inconsistent with B meson decays and so they are

The data were collected with the ARGUE detector? at the e+e- storage ring DORIS II at different centre-of-

either background or originate from the continuum be-

mass energies between 9.4 and 10 .6 GeV. The analyzed event samples correspond to integrated luminosities of 31 .6 pb -1 on the T(1S), 38 .2 pb -1 on the T(2S),

104.5 pb -1 on the T(4S), and 47 .1 pb -1 in the nearby tRepresenting the ARGUS collaboration

0920-5632/90/$3.50 © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V . North-Holland

low the T(4S) resonance. The expected backgrounds are two events in total for the T(1S) and T(2S) data

and three d candidates for the combined multihadronic events from T(4S) decays and the continuum.

Assuming that the baryon number is balanced by protons and neutrons with equal probability we expect 8

A. Lindner/Antideuteron production 1/a do/ dp [ 10-5GeV-'c]

31 5

a Maxwell distribution f(p) = a .02 - exp(-E/b)

10.0

where E and p denote energy and momentum of the antideuteron, ,ß stands for its velocity and the free parameters a and b were fit to the data . The result with b = (195 f 80) MeV is shown as the solid line

5.0 / 0.0

~~

0.0

0.5

1 .0

in fig.l .

COW.. .

VR 1.5

From this we derive a production rate of

(6.0 f 2.0 f 0.6) -10 -5 antideuterons per direct hadro-

l~.

2.0

P [GeV/c]

nic T(1S),T(2S) decay where the first error is statistical

and the second systematic . Assuming the same momentum distribution for

d produced in continuum reactions

and not correcting for any background the two observed

antideuteron candidates give an upper limit at the 90%

Figure 1: T(1S) and T(2S) data (full points), fitted

confidence level of 1.7 -10-5 d per continuum event.

fied coalesence model (shaded histogramm).

distinctly enhanced in gluon mediated T decays compa-

Maxwell distribution (line) and prediction from a modi-

events with one well identified proton (momentum less

than 1 .2 Get//c) and 2 events with two protons. In our d sample 8 events contain one proton and 3 events two protons which is fully consistent with the expectation . Scaling the number of selected d events of the combined

T(4S) and continuum sample according to luminosity and the hadronic continuum cross section results in 0.5

events each for the T(1S) and T(2S) data . Therefore the observed events cannot be explained by pure continuum production of

d. The ratio of the number of d

events from T(1S) and T(2S) data agrees with the ratio of the corresponding number of direct hadronic decays of these resonances. So we have observed

d production

in the gluon mediated decays of the T(15) and T(2S)

resonances while no evidence for antideuterons origina-

ting from continuum events or T(4S) decays could be found .

In order to achieve better statistics and because of the good agreement between the two samples, the T(1S) and T(2S) data were combined to calculate the diffe-

rential cross section. After background subtraction and

efficiency correction, the momentum distribution of the antideuterons is shown in fig.l . To extrapolate we use

Therefore we conclude that antideuteron production is red to the continuum reaction e+e- -+ qq . Compared

to antiproton production', (0 .254 f 0.014) p/event, antideuterons are suppressed T(1S), T(2S) decays

by

in

a factor

direct

hadronic

4 . 10 3 and

with respect to the production of baryon pairs9, (2 .00 f 0.12) .10-3 (pp + pp)/event, by a factor of 30 .

No fragmentation model makes predictions for d pro-

duction . Assuming that antideuterons am produced directly in the fragmentation chain the d rates should be similar to other hadrons with approximately the same

mass and not differ by orders of magnitude. In direct ha-

dronic T(1S) decays the production rate of the S2 - , having a mass only 11% less than the d, was determined to be (1 .83 f 0.62 f 0.32) . 10 -3 i2 - / event. This number is very similar to two baryon production and therefore strengthens the assumption that the production of

hadrons in the fragmentation process is mainly a matter of their invariant mass. With respect to the 12 - antideuterons show again a suppression by a factor of 30 .

From these comparisions a direct production of antideuterons in the fragmentation process seems to be rather unlikely .

However, the d production can be related to our measurement of antiproton production in direct hadronic

T(1S) decays using a model which was first develo-

A. Lindner/Antideuteron production

31 6

ped to interp'ete deuteron production in high energy nucleus nucleus collisionsl 0.

Independently produced

V and n may coalesce into a d if their momenta are

close enough in momentum space. Therefore the anti-

deuteron cross section may be expressed as the product of the p and n cross sections if the difference of their momentum vectors lies inside a sphere with radius pp : d 3 Q(d) _ 47r 3 1 d3c , (p) p0-Y 3 Orhsd dap o (ohad da p _1

3 1 d a(n) had

dap

Here, p denotes the momentum per nucleon, y is a Lorentz factor y = [1 + ( p2 /mn)J t /2 with the nucleon mass m. In high energy hadron collisions pp was found to be around 130

eV/c . If we assume the same value

for e+e- data, an isotropic particle production in direct

hadronic 1fdecays, an equal antineutron and antiproton

production rate and use the measured inclusive p cross sectionl, the model predictions can be compared to the d measurement. This is done in fig.l where the shaded

histogram shows the model calculations . In spite of the rough assumptions, data and model agree within a factor of two. If the coalesence model holds then the enhancement r in direct hadronic decays relative to continuum events for d should be similar to the value found for baryon pairs, although the absolute production rates

differ by a factor of 30. ARGUE has measured a large enhancement r(pp + pp) = 4,45 f 0.51. If one divides

the observed d rates for the T data by this number the result is very compatible with our upper limit for d production in the continuum.

Summing up these comparisons, the antideuteron production may be explained by the coalescence of indepen-

dently produced P and n while it can hardly be described by direct production in the fragmentation chain.

This work was supported by the German Bundesminis-

terium für Forschung und Technologie under contract number 054D051P . References : 1. ARGUS Collaboration, H . Albrecht et al ., DESY 89-014 (1989) . 2. ARGUS Collaboration, H . Albrecht et al ., DESY 89-066 (1989) . 3. ARGUS Collaboration, H . Albrecht et al ., Z.Phys.C 39, 177 (1988). 4. ARGUS Collaboration, H . Albrecht et al ., Z.Phys .C 41, 557 (1989). 5. DASD 11 Collaboration, H. Albrecht et al ., Phys.Lett.102 , 291 (1981) . 6. ARGUS Collaboration, H . Albrecht et al ., Phys.Lett. 157B, 326 (1985) . 7. ARGUS Collaboration, H . Albrecht et al ., Nucl . Instr.Methods X1275, 1 (1989). 8. M. Paulini, Diplorna thesis, University Erlangen, Erlangen, FRG ARGUS Collaboration, H. Albrecht et al ., Publication in preparation . 9. ARGUS Collaboration, H. Albrecht et al ., Publication in preparation . 10. H .H . Gutbrod et al ., Phys .Rev .Lett. 37, 667 (1976) . H .Sato, K.Yazaki, Phys .Lett. 98B, 153 (1981) .