- Email: [email protected]
As the Reader Sees It
PROCTERITES BY PROCLAMATION?
every legal right and financial inducement to abuse the names. Our name can be changed and its use controlled only by the AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION, the core of professional pharmacy. If joining the AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION (newly-to-be-named something else) were to mean general recognition of the member as a professional man, joining it might be more popular. Selection and ejection of members by the A. PH. A. would be an effective control of professional ethics. This is not a new idea. Others use it freely. Why not we? It's time for the A. PH. A. to lead us again as it did in 1852 and 1870, but this time under a new banner. IGNATIUS J. BELLAFIORE St. John's University College of Pharmacy Brooklyn, N. Y.
To the Editor: A major topic in pharmaceutical discussion today is, "How can we improve the professional status of pharmacy?" We really do not mean what we say; there is nothing wrong with the professional status of pharmacy. We mean, "How can we dissociate ourselves from all kinds of things that are not pharmacy and yet call themselves pharmacy?". .. We wish to make professional the nonprofessional pharmacist. Since he doesn't care for that kind of improvement, he objects and so we can get nowhere .... It seems that the name pharmacy embraces at least two, and perhaps many more, elements rather completely antagonistic to each other in purpose and means, but forcedly huddled together under an intramural, battle-scarred banner bearing the one name. Since the professional and the commercial factions in pharmacy are both firmly established, and both are really necessary in our scheme of things, and both do actually perform a service to the public (but a different service), and both are legally entitled to the name pharmacy, it seems to me that all the argument is over a common name and that basically, therefore, no other argument really exists. If I as a teacher of pharmacy, or you as a professional retail pharmacist, or as a secretary of a board of pharmacy object, not to our work, but to being called a pharmacist along with the cut-rater, the merchandiser and the soda fountain-luncheonette operator, why don't we change our name, leaving pharmacist to him-then we'll all be happy .... Why not call ourselves Procterists after Procter, the father of American pharmacy, and call our profession Proctery? The mechanics of the change, the restriction of the name's use, the publicizing of it-these are not difficult compared to all the trouble we unsuccessfully go to nowadays to dissociate ourselves from commercialism. The terms pharmacist, pharmacy, druggist and drugstore are so firmly identified with the soda fountain, luncheonette and general merchandise that it is impossible to dissociate them. Any effort to professionalize these names is always destroyed by the solidly entrenched commercial stores which have
A VISITOR FROM CHINA To the Editor: As our furlough is due next year Mrs. Meuser and I plan to leave West China for the United States and Canada early in March, 1945, if political conditions at that time permit. Inasmuch as the development of modern pharmaceutical education and practice in this great country,. with its vast population, will open up rather unusual opportunities for international relations in both culture and commerce, perhaps pharmaceutical associations, pharmacy colleges and manufacturers, as well as individual friends of China, might be interested in receiving fresh and first-hand information regarding the situation in this country, pharmaceutically and otherwise. I shall be glad to make any advance arrangements that may be possible to meet such individual or groups of organizations. It will be appreciated if those interested would be good enough to write to me here as early as possible so that we may make our plans accordingly .... E. N. MBUSBJt Department of Pharmacy West China Union University Chengtu, Szechwan, China
5
every legal right and financial inducement to abuse the names. Our name can be changed and its use controlled only by the AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION, the core of professional pharmacy. If joining the AMERICAN PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION (newly-to-be-named something else) were to mean general recognition of the member as a professional man, joining it might be more popular. Selection and ejection of members by the A. PH. A. would be an effective control of professional ethics. This is not a new idea. Others use it freely. Why not we? It's time for the A. PH. A. to lead us again as it did in 1852 and 1870, but this time under a new banner. IGNATIUS J. BELLAFIORE St. John's University College of Pharmacy Brooklyn, N. Y.
To the Editor: A major topic in pharmaceutical discussion today is, "How can we improve the professional status of pharmacy?" We really do not mean what we say; there is nothing wrong with the professional status of pharmacy. We mean, "How can we dissociate ourselves from all kinds of things that are not pharmacy and yet call themselves pharmacy?". .. We wish to make professional the nonprofessional pharmacist. Since he doesn't care for that kind of improvement, he objects and so we can get nowhere .... It seems that the name pharmacy embraces at least two, and perhaps many more, elements rather completely antagonistic to each other in purpose and means, but forcedly huddled together under an intramural, battle-scarred banner bearing the one name. Since the professional and the commercial factions in pharmacy are both firmly established, and both are really necessary in our scheme of things, and both do actually perform a service to the public (but a different service), and both are legally entitled to the name pharmacy, it seems to me that all the argument is over a common name and that basically, therefore, no other argument really exists. If I as a teacher of pharmacy, or you as a professional retail pharmacist, or as a secretary of a board of pharmacy object, not to our work, but to being called a pharmacist along with the cut-rater, the merchandiser and the soda fountain-luncheonette operator, why don't we change our name, leaving pharmacist to him-then we'll all be happy .... Why not call ourselves Procterists after Procter, the father of American pharmacy, and call our profession Proctery? The mechanics of the change, the restriction of the name's use, the publicizing of it-these are not difficult compared to all the trouble we unsuccessfully go to nowadays to dissociate ourselves from commercialism. The terms pharmacist, pharmacy, druggist and drugstore are so firmly identified with the soda fountain, luncheonette and general merchandise that it is impossible to dissociate them. Any effort to professionalize these names is always destroyed by the solidly entrenched commercial stores which have
A VISITOR FROM CHINA To the Editor: As our furlough is due next year Mrs. Meuser and I plan to leave West China for the United States and Canada early in March, 1945, if political conditions at that time permit. Inasmuch as the development of modern pharmaceutical education and practice in this great country,. with its vast population, will open up rather unusual opportunities for international relations in both culture and commerce, perhaps pharmaceutical associations, pharmacy colleges and manufacturers, as well as individual friends of China, might be interested in receiving fresh and first-hand information regarding the situation in this country, pharmaceutically and otherwise. I shall be glad to make any advance arrangements that may be possible to meet such individual or groups of organizations. It will be appreciated if those interested would be good enough to write to me here as early as possible so that we may make our plans accordingly .... E. N. MBUSBJt Department of Pharmacy West China Union University Chengtu, Szechwan, China
5