Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 59 & 60 (1983) 723-726 North-Holland PublishingCompany
723
a-Si:H PRODUCED BY DOUBI~ ION-BEAM SPUTTERING
C. COLUZZA, D. DELLA SALA, G. FORTUNAT0 ~, S. SCAGLIONE and A. FROVA
Rome,
Dipartimento di Fisica G. Marconi, Universita' La Sapienza, 00185 Italy ZCNR-IESS Laboratory, Via Cineto Romano 42, 00156 Rome, Italy
A novel technique to obtain a-Si:H films by a dual ion-beam sputtering (DIBS) system is described. A beam of argon is used to sputter silicon, while a beam of hydrogen impinges directly onto the growing film. The system has proven to be very efficient in the control of growth parameters. Hydrogen incorporation can be remarkably affected by varying the energy of the H ions. IR spectra indicate that, when the energy is raised from 80 to 800 eV, the density of isolated Sill clusters in the material increases relative to Sill. The samples obtained exhibit promising optical and electrical properties. The optical energy gap is typically 1.7 eV and the room temperature conductivity is in the range I0-9-I0-i~ ~cm) -I . Photoconductivity values of IO-9(~ cm)-lare obtained. I. INTRODUCTION The commonly used techniques for the deposition of a-Si:H do separate
control
of
the various deposition parameters.
DIBS technique presented here has the pressure
(10-4-10-5mbar),
following
not
permit
a
In this respect, the
advantages:
low
deposition
separation of the substrate from the plasma genera-
tion region, controlled deposition angle, independent regulation
of
ion
beam
currents and energies and better control of the hydrogenation process.
2. EXPERIMenTAL The deposition apparatus is shown in Fig.1. type.
During
growth, a beam of Ar
by
a
up
sources
to 15 at%;
are
Kaufman
The latter is simultaneously bom-
beam of hydrogen ions from gun 2 (procedure A).
growth conditions have been used: 2,
ion
ions sputters silicon from a polycrystal-
line target, to a rotating heated substrate. barded
The
(B) Ar
Two alternative
ions are mixed in the flow from
gun
(C) with gun 2 shut off, an equivalent pressure of hydrogen
was maintained in the chamber (typically 3 x 10-4mbar).
The isst procedure was
meant to verify that most of the hydrogenation arises from the presence of the 0022-3093/83/0000-0000/$03.00 © 1983 North-Holland/Physical Society of Japan
C Coluzza et al, / a-Si:H produced by double ion-beam sputtering
724
H ion beam. The films obtained with all three methods appear to be amorphous throughout, as shown by X-ray analysis.
I
[
l
FIGURE I Scheme of the deposition apparatus. Typical growth parameters: beam e n e r ~ = 600 eV and beam current = 20 mA (GUN i); beam energy = 80-800 eV and beam current : 1-10 mA (GUN 2); deposition temperature = 200-350 °C.
3. OPTICAL MEASUR]~ENTS The samples have been investigated by IR and visible spectroscopy. purpose
of
The main
IR absorption is to estimate the hydrogen content C H from the area
of the wagging-mode bands centered at 640 cm -I
i
The estimate based
on
the
area of stretching bands in the region of 2000 cm-i is considered less reliable, because of the strong influence of the atomic surroundings over the strengths of these modes, as pointed out by some authors In almost all samples,
in addition to bands
shoulder is observed at ~2070 cm -i. affected by the e n e r ~ of the 840-890 cm -I doublet
at
640
oscillator
2,3 and
2000
c~ I a
weak
The strength of this shoulder is strongly
hydrogen
beam,
as
shown
in
Fig.2.
As
the
is not seen, the 2070 cm -i shoulder is not likely to repre-
C, Coluzza et al. / a-Si:H produced by double ion-beam sputtering
sent SiH 2 groupin@s
2,4
725
Moreover, it cannot be attributed to the
electrone-
gativity shifts of the SiH stretching bands due to the presence of oxygen which is negligible in our case. clusters
of
SiH
bonds
The shoulder is
probably
related
3 ,
to
small
surrounding silicon vacancies 2 , which are supported
also by a systematic lower value of C H if this is evaluated from the stretching bands using the known oscillator strength of SiH 2
5
Eg (eV)
0
o
~-Q5
17
•
•
•
•
•
o
q~o oo
•
o
-Q3
o#
X
t5 o
%
.0.1 e o
I
I
I
300
IO0
t-4
I
i
l
500
I
700
1.3
I
o
Eb(eV)
FIGURE 2 Relative strength of 2070 and 2000 cm -I bands vs. beam energy of GUN 2.
I
I
5
10
I
15 CH(% )
FIGURE 3 Optical gap E~ vs. hydrogen content CH. Closed circles: samples A; open circles: samples B; crosses: samples C.
Absorption in the visible has been used to obtain values of the optical Eg
by the usual method of the (~hv ]/2 vs hv intercept.
sults for samples of both type A and B. former
case,
where
the
films, large values of Eg
It is
worth
gap
Fig. 3 shows the re-
stressing
that
in
the
refractive index is 5.8 as opposed to 3.2 for type B are already attained at low H content.
4- ELECTRICAL MEASUREMENTS The electrical measurements were performed in four-probe
vacuum
method for temperatures ranging from T=300 K to 450 K.
tivity of almost all samples shows an activated behaviour with
AE
content.
(10-3torr)
ranging from 0.7 to 0.9 eV.
with
the
The conduc-
o =o o exp(- AE/kT),
This happens also for films with low H
C. Coluzza et al. / a-Si:H produced by double ion-beam sputtering
726
The estimated Co tion
due
is in the range 10 3 -105
to electrons in extended states 6
(g~ cm) -i, pointing
GD
material.
conduc-
This corresponds to a room tem-
perature conductivity in the range 10 -9 -10-i i (2 ca)-i, good
to
i.e.
comparable
to
Photoconductivity has values of order 10-9 (;2 cm~lusing a
He-Ne laser with 1015photons/(cm 2 sec).
CONCLUSIONS AND A C K N O W I ~ T S Preliminary optical and transport measurements in a-Si:H ion-beam
produced
by
dual
sputtering indicate that the quality of the material is promising.
more detailed structural characterization is in progress, studies and FIR spectroscopy measurements.
involving
A
annealing
We wish to thank F. Evangelisti for
helpful discussions, A. D'Amico and R. Moretto for technical support.
REFACES I)
H.R.Shanks, F.R. Jeffrey, M.E. Lowry: Proc. and Liquid Semiconductors II (1981) 773.
2)
H. Shanks, C.J. Fang, L. Ley, M. Cardona, F.J. Demond, S. Kalbitzer, Stat. Sol. (b) 100 (1980) 43.
3)
G. Lucovsky, Proc.
Ninth Int. Conf.
Ninth Int.
Conf.
Amorphous and Liquid
Amorphous
Semiconductors
I I (1981) 741. 4)
W. Paul, Solid State Commun.
5)
A. Kasdan and D.P. Goshorn, J.
34 (1980) 283.
6) D.A. Anderson and W. Paul, Phil.
Vac. Mag.
Sci.
Technol.
B44 (1981) 187.
Phys.
20 (1982) 305.