Journal Pre-proof Assessment of trace metal contamination and bioavailability in an Environmental Protection Area: Guaxindiba estuarine system (Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro Brazil) Michele Fernandes, Estefan Monteiro da Fonseca, Leonardo da Silva Lima, Susanna Eleonora Sichel, Jessica de Freitas Delgado, Thulio Righeti Correa, Valquiria Maria de Carvalho Aguiar, José Antonio Baptista Neto
PII: DOI: Reference:
S2352-4855(19)30421-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101143 RSMA 101143
To appear in:
Regional Studies in Marine Science
Received date : 6 June 2019 Revised date : 3 February 2020 Accepted date : 3 February 2020 Please cite this article as: M. Fernandes, E.M. Fonseca, L.S. Lima et al., Assessment of trace metal contamination and bioavailability in an Environmental Protection Area: Guaxindiba estuarine system (Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro Brazil). Regional Studies in Marine Science (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101143. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Journal Pre-proof Assessment of trace metal contamination and bioavailability in an Environmental
2
Protection Area: Guaxindiba estuarine system (Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro,
3
Brazil)
4
Michele Fernandes, Estefan Monteiro da Fonseca; Leonardo da Silva Lima; Susanna
5
Eleonora Sichel; Jessica de Freitas Delgado; Thulio Righeti Correa, Valquiria Maria de
6
Carvalho Aguiara, José Antonio Baptista Neto
7
Departamento de Geologia e Geofísica/LAGEMAR – Universidade Federal Fluminense-Brazil - Av. Litorânea
8
s/nº - 24210-340-Gragoatá, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.
9
a
lP repro of
1
[email protected] (55) (21)26295910
10
Abstract
11
Guaxindiba River, located inside an Environmental Protected Area (EPA) inside Guanabara
12
Bay, was evaluated concerning trace metals and arsenic. A total of 7 sediment cores up to
13
80 cm were extracted along the river and in the channel that connects Guaxindiba and
14
Caceribu rivers. No natural enrichment from bottom to top was observed, suggesting a
15
constant mobilization of the sedimentary column along the Guaxindiba River. Results
16
showed elevated concentrations of Zn (175.77-321.01 mg.kg-1) and Ni (27.71-108.39 mg.kg-
17
1
18
severely enriched in Ni (EF >10) and Cu (EF>5). No enrichment was observed for As. The
19
evaluation of bioavailability through the Risk Assessment Code (RAC), however, revealed
20
medium risk for Zn and Ni, which exhibited high concentrations, and low risk for sediments
21
severely enriched in Cu. Despite exhibiting minor enrichment and low concentrations, under
22
PEL, the RAC revealed high risk for Cd, for bioavailability. Overall, the Guaxindiba River
23
proved to be contaminated by recent pollution, in spite of its localization inside an EPA.
24
Keywords: sediments; trace metals; bioavailability; estuaries; EPA Guapimirim,
25
Guaxindiba River
Jou
rna
) surpassing the probable effect levels (PEL) reference values. Sediments were considered
26
1. Introduction
27
Estuaries are dynamic, complex and unique environments, and are considered the most
28
productive marine ecosystems in the world (Chapman and Wang, 2001; Hossain, et al,
29
2019). They are the transition zone between the continents and the ocean and are constantly
30
subjected to morphodynamic alterations driven by continental and marine processes
31
(Pritchard, 1967, Dalrymple, 2006). These environments attract urbanization and the
32
negative consequences that come along with it, especially the contamination of water and
33
sediments, which can affect local biota. They are the ultimate sinks for anthropogenic 1
Journal Pre-proof pollutants, with a wide variety of contaminants implied in environmental disturbances
35
(Ducrotoy, 2010; Pan & Wang, 2011). The role of estuarine sediments as sinks for chemical
36
pollutants is well established in several studies that describe the role of this compartment as
37
a geological record (Abuchacra et al., 2015; Aguiar et al., 2018), allowing the evaluation of
38
anthropogenic inputs over time (Chatterjee et al., 2007; Veerasingam et al., 2015). The study
39
of sediment cores is an excellent approach to evaluate the effects of anthropogenic
40
influences on depositional environments, as well as natural processes.
lP repro of
34
Among urban contaminants, trace metals pose one of the most deleterious threats that
42
reach coastal areas (Baptista Neto et al., 2006). These elements are extremely persistent in
43
the environment and can be bioaccumulated and concentrated in the upper levels of the food
44
chain. Trace metals are potentially damaging to ecosystem health, interfering with the
45
physiology and ecology of marine organisms (Udofia et al., 2009). It is known that the
46
distribution, mobility and bioavailability of trace metals are highly variable in different
47
aquatic environments (Fonseca et al., 2014) and it follows that the particular dynamics of
48
such elements in sediments are directly influenced by their fractionation (e.g. metal
49
carbonates, oxides, sulfides, organometallic compounds) rather than by their total
50
concentration (Okoro et al., 2012). Total metal concentration does not provide information
51
concerning bioavailability, toxicity or mobility. The amount of bioavailable metal in
52
sediments for aquatic organisms drives toxicity; therefore, it is possible that a contaminated
53
sediment has a large concentration of trace metals but does not manifest toxic effects on
54
biota. For this reason the evaluation of trace metal fractionation within the sediment has
55
fundamental importance in determining remobilization potential (Abollino, et al., 2011;
56
Canuto et al., 2013).
rna
41
Low hydrodynamic energy prevails in the Guanabara Bay where the deposition of fine
58
sediments associated with estuarine processes predominate. In the northeast sector there is
59
an extensive fluviomarine flat that comprises an area of environmental preservation
60
denominated EPA de Guapimirim, considered the biggest remaining mangrove forest of
61
Guanabara Bay (Baptista Neto et al., 2006; Soares-Gomes, et al. 2016). Guaxindiba River is
62
located in this preservation area and its upper course receives domestic and industrial
63
wastewater discharge, mainly from São Gonçalo city (Fonseca et al., 2014). Its lower course
64
and mouth are surrounded by a remaining area of mangrove (Porto et al., 2014). Despite the
65
discharge of pollutants received by the Guaxindiba River, this is an important area for
66
artisanal fishing (Ferreira et al., 2011). However, the high level of pollutants directly
67
impacts the fishing communities that depend on fish and invertebrates (Maranho et al.,
Jou
57
2
Journal Pre-proof 68
2009). Finally, there is uncertainty about the capacity of this river to trap pollutants for long
69
periods since its drainage basin has an extremely steep geomorphology, resulting in large
70
sediment remobilization during rainfall events in the wet season. Dredging is also a strong
71
factor influencing sediment remobilization in the Guaxindiba river. The aim of the present study was to assess trace metal contamination and potential
73
bioavailability of these elements along the main channel of the Guaxindiba River, and to
74
characterize trace metal export during the strong summer rain flushing events.
lP repro of
72
75 76
2. Study Area
77
Located in the northeast area of Guanabara Bay, the Guapimirim Environmental
78
Protected Area (EPA) covers 14,000 ha of mangroves, marine area, farms and urban
79
concentrations in the cities of São Gonçalo, Itaboraí, Magé and Guapimirim. The
80
Guaxindiba River is part of this EPA, contributing with water and sediment inputs into the
81
Guanabara Bay. The area consists of a flat-lying coastal plain with quaternary sediments,
82
mainly clays and silts with interbedded sands (Catanzaro et al., 2004, Baptista Neto et al.,
83
2006). The Guaxindiba River receives domestic and industrial sewage, resulting in a high
84
degree of deterioration (Fonseca et al., 2014). It is also commonly used as a dumping spot
85
for a significant part of the population not served by public urban sewage system.
Previous studies of the Guaxindiba River by Aguiar et al. (2011), Fonseca et al. (2014)
87
and Abuchacra (2018) revealed anthropogenic impacts at this area. Aguiar et al. (2011)
88
evaluated the water column of the Guaxindiba River and found extreme elevated
89
concentrations of nutrients along with hypoxia, characterizing severe eutrophication in this
90
area. Fonseca et al. (2014) studied the contamination levels of the Guaxindiba River
91
sediments for organic compounds and trace metals. According to the Eh data, near the
92
bottom, the conditions are reductive. Fine particles predominated in most of the stations,
93
between 51.4 and 96.8% of silt and clay, characterizing a low hydrodynamic environment.
94
High levels of salinity were registered throughout the water column of the entire Guaxindiba
95
River (29.0 to 31.0), suggesting that the supply of freshwater in the environment is low and
96
there is a long range salt wedge. It has been suggested that the main hydrodynamic force
97
acting on the study area is the tide. Fonseca et al. (2014) confirmed this information through
98
the tide station installation. Results did not indicate any discrepancy between the river level
99
and values recorded in Rio de Janeiro Harbour, also located inside Guanabara Bay. The
100
study revealed a very impacted environment. The results of the total organic carbon and
101
particle size analysis indicated favorable conditions for the contaminant deposition, with
Jou
rna
86
3
Journal Pre-proof high concentrations of organic matter. The study conducted by Abuchacra (2018) confirmed
103
the influence of domestic effluents and fertilizers in the EPA of Guapimirim, especially in
104
the Guaxindiba mangrove area.
Jou
rna
lP repro of
102
4
Journal Pre-proof 105
3. Materials and methods
106
3.1.Sampling Seven sampling stations were situated along the margins of the Guaxindiba estuarine
108
environment (Fig. 1). Water variables, pH, dissolved oxygen (DO) and oxidation potential
109
(Eh) were measured near the bottom with a YSI® probe. For sediment sampling, PVC cores
110
were manually inserted into bottom sediments up to 1 m. Sediment cores were transported to
111
the laboratory and opened vertically. Each core was sub-sampled into 20 cm aliquots. All
112
the cores were located along the Guaxindiba River, except for core 7, which was located in
113
an artificial channel connecting the Guaxindiba and Caceribu rivers.
114 115
Jou
rna
lP repro of
107
Figure 1: Guaxindiba River and sampled stations.
116 5
Journal Pre-proof 117 118 119
3.2.Laboratory Analysis Particle size analysis was performed using a Malvern 2600LC laser analyzer after removal of organic matter through loss on ignition and carbonate with HCl 10%. Total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN) and sulfur (S) were determined in
121
samples previously treated with HCL 10% (v/v) to eliminate carbonates. Samples were read
122
on a Perkin Elmer CHNS/O Analyser 2400. For the determination of total trace metal
123
concentrations and As, 0.5 g of each sample was weighed and digested with 15.0 ml of
124
HNO3. After 12 h, samples were heated at 160°C for 4 h. The extraction proceeded with the
125
addition of 8.0 ml of hydrogen peroxide 30% (v/v) and subsequent heating at 160 C for 30
126
more minutes. Samples were then filtered through 0.45µm membranes and diluted to
127
100 mL in a volumetric flask. Sample blanks and a reference sediment WQB-1 from the
128
National Laboratory for Environmental Testing, (Burlington, CA) were also analyzed at
129
regular intervals to monitor quality control. Mercury analysis was performed according to
130
USEPA method 7471 (USEPA, 1997). The quality of the analytical results was controlled
131
by the use of an analytical blank.
132 133
lP repro of
120
Digested samples were determined using a Perkin Elmer Model 4100 atomic absorption spectrophotometer.
Cores 3 and 5 at depths of 0-20 and 60-80 cm were chosen for the sequential
135
extraction analysis. The fractionation of trace metals was performed using BCR procedure
136
(Community Bureau of Reference), with BCR 701 as reference material (Ure et al., 1993;
137
Passos et al. 2010; Passos et al. 2011; Canuto et al. 2013, Aguiar et al., 2018). The analysis
138
was performed using 0.5 g of sample, maintaining the proportion of sample to volume of
139
reagent, following the original method of a total mass of 1.0 g (Pessoa, 2011, Aguiar et al.,
140
2018). The accuracy of the analytical procedure was assessed using the certified reference
141
material BCR 701. The extraction procedure involves three steps:
142
Step 1: Exchangeable fraction (F1-soluble in acid or metals bounded to carbonates). Metals
143
were extracted through mechanical shaking with 20 ml of acetic acid 0.11 M for 16 h,
144
followed by centrifugation to separate the extract.
145
Step 2: Reducible fraction (F2-metals bounded to Fe and Mn oxides). Metals were extracted
146
through mechanical shaking with 20 ml of hydroxylammonium chloride (pH 1.5) for 16 h,
147
followed by centrifugation to separate the extract.
148
Step 3: Oxidizable fraction (F3-metals bounded to organic matter and sulfides). Metals were
149
extracted with 5 ml of H2O2 8.8 M, and left for 1 h at room temperature followed by heating
150
in a water bath at 85oC. Then the sample was treated with another 5 ml of H2O2 8.8 M and
Jou
rna
134
6
Journal Pre-proof was left to dry at 85oC for 1 h. After cooling, 25 ml of ammonium acetate 1 M was added to
152
the sample followed by mechanical shaking for 16 h, and centrifugation to separate the
153
extract.
154
In between the steps, the samples were washed with 15 ml of Milli-Q water, mechanically
155
shaken for 15 minutes and centrifuged to extract the supernatant. All reagents used were
156
analytical grade. The trace metals in each extract were determined using a flame atomic
157
absorption spectrometer (FAAS) with an AA Analyst 800-Perkin Elmer.
The residual concentration was calculated by the difference from the total obtained
158 159
lP repro of
151
sediment concentration (TC):
R = TC –(F1+F2+F3)
160 161
3.3.Indexes
162
3.3.1.
Risk Assesment Code
163
The Risk Assesment Code (RAC) was used to evaluate ecological risk, considering
164
the percentage of metal in the first extraction (exchangeable/soluble in acid). The ecological
165
risk is classified as: (i) no risk (<1%); (ii) low risk (1-10%); (iii) medium risk (11-30%); (iv)
166
high risk (31-50%) and (v) very high risk (>50%) (Canuto et al., 2013, Aguiar et al., 2018).
167
3.3.2.
Enrichment Factor
In order to assess sediment contamination, enrichment factors (EF) were calculated.
169
To reduce grain size and mineralogical effects on metal variability and to identify possible
170
anomalous metal concentrations, geochemical normalization of the metal data to a
171
conservative element, should be applied. Fe concentrations have been used for normalization
172
purposes (Ho et al., 2012). The enrichment factor (EF) (Ergin et al., 1991) for each element
173
was calculated as:
Jou
174
rna
168
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 =
𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇
𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋
175
where:
176
EF = Enrichment factor,
177
TMc =Measured trace metal concentration (mg.kg-1),
178
Xc = Measured normalizing element concentration. Fe was used as normalizer (mg.kg-1),
179
TMref = Trace metal concentration in local background, average shale or upper crust
180
(mg.kg-1),
7
Journal Pre-proof 181
Xref = Normalizing element concentration in background and upper crust values. In the
182
present study, Fe was used for normalization. EF values around 1.0 indicate that the element in the sediment originated
184
predominantly from lithogenous material, whereas EF values higher than 1.0 indicate that
185
the element is of anthropogenic origin. The degree of enrichment is given by EF ranges as
186
follows: EF < 1-no enrichment;1
187
5
188
severe enrichment and EF > 50-extremely severe enrichment.
lP repro of
183
189
Data was evaluated statistically using a Spearman analysis to check the significance
190
of the correlation between the variables and Kruskall-Wallis to test the significance of the
191
differences between cores. Analyses were performed with Statistica 7.0®.
192
4. Results and Discussion
Reducing conditions of the Guaxindiba bottom waters revealed highly negative Eh
194
values (Fig. 2). Low oxygenation of bottom waters was found at every station, with the
195
exception of C3. Hypoxia (DO<2.00 mg/l) was found at upper stations C1 and C2 and also
196
at C6 (Fig. 2). Dissolved oxygen levels under 5 mg.l-1 indicates the beginning of biological
197
stress, and hypoxia is a symptom of eutrophication, especially in shallow waters that can
198
lead to the reduction of demersal fish stocks, migration of benthic animals and even the
199
complete disappearance of marine organisms. Eutrophication alters living resources and
200
habitat carrying capacity (Yin et al., 2004; Dodds, 2006). Results at certain stations (C1, C2
201
and C6) corroborated the findings of Aguiar et al. (2011) that found DO values between 0
202
and 2.32 mg.l-1 at the Guaxindiba waters, indicating anoxia and hypoxia in this river.
Jou
203
rna
193
204 205
Figure 2: pH, dissolved oxygen (DO) and oxidation potential (Eh) at bottom waters of the Guaxindiba River.
8
Journal Pre-proof Trace metal distribution as well as organic matter in sediments are essentially
207
controlled by the presence of fine particles, among other factors (Yao et al., 2015). In the
208
present study, fine particles were predominant in every station. The sum of silt and clay
209
ranged between 77 and 99% (Fig. 3). Grain size results of Guaxindiba reveal the potential of
210
the river to retain contaminants and organic matter and characterized it as a low
211
hydrodynamic environment (Yao et al., 2015). The present study corroborated the findings
212
of Fonseca et al. (2014) of silt and clay between 51.4 and 96.8% in Guaxindiba bottom
213
sediments. Additionally, Porto et al. 2014, described the predominance of fine particles
214
(over 90%), in the same area.
Jou
rna
lP repro of
206
9
Journal Pre-proof
lP repro of
215
Figure 3: Results of grain size analysis for sediment cores.
216
Overall, TOC was quite elevated (Fig. 4), varying between 3.16 and 8.07%. Core 1
218
had the lowest concentrations among the stations. A noticeable increase was found in cores
219
2 and 7 from 20 cm towards the top. Total nitrogen followed the pattern of TOC, with core 1
220
having the lowest concentrations and a remarkable increase from bottom to top in cores 2
221
and 7. Core 4 also showed an increase in TN concentrations towards the top. C/N varied
222
between 8.66 to 13.61, characterizing organic matter of mixed origin tending to marine, with
223
the exception of the top of core 3, in which C/N (13.61) revealed organic matter of mixed
224
origin (Bader, 1955). Core 1 had the lowest concentrations of S, following the pattern of
225
TOC and C/N. Most C/S values ranged from 1.62 to 5.01, revealing a reducing environment
226
(Borrego et al., 1998), corroborating the results of Eh from bottom water. The only
227
exception was the bottom of core 1, with C/S value of 7.49, characterizing an oxidizing
228
environment. From the point of view of elemental analysis, the area of core 1 at the upper
229
river seems to be the least impacted by domestic input along Guaxindiba. TOC and TN
230
results were in accordance with the findings of Abuchacra (2018) for Guaxindiba, who
231
registered ranges of 3.61-6.94% and 0.30-0.53% for total organic carbon and nitrogen,
232
respectively.
Jou
rna
217
233 10
lP repro of
Journal Pre-proof
234
Figure 4: Results of total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN) and sulfur (S) for cores
235
C1 to C7 at Guaxindiba River.
Overall no metal profile showed a typical superficial enrichment, with the exception
237
of Cd, suggesting a continuous remobilization of local sediment resulting from chronic
238
events such as seasonal rains as well as the steep morphology effects (Fig. 5). Dredging
239
operations at the study area are also a strong factor to be considered in sediments
240
remobilization.
rna
236
The effects of pollution in aquatic systems are usually reflected by benthic
242
organisms, since they can integrate recent pollution recorded in the sediments and different
243
kinds of pollutants (Okbah et al., 2014). Sediment quality guidelines have been developed
244
over the last decades in order to evaluate pollution effects on benthic fauna. Some of the
245
most used sediment guidelines are Threshold Effect Level (TEL) and Probable Effect Level
246
(PEL) (MacDonald et al., 1996, Long and MacDonald, 1998, Okbah et al., 2014). TEL
247
corresponds to concentrations under which adverse biological effects rarely occur and PEL
248
accounts for concentrations above which biological adverse effects are frequently observed.
Jou
241
249
Zinc concentrations exceeded threshold levels (124 mg.kg-1) in every core along the
250
Guaxindiba River. Highest values, above PEL (271 mg.kg-1) were found at C1
251
(284.58 mg.kg-1) and C3 (321.01 mg.kg-1) at the upper river (Fig. 1) both having a very
252
similar vertical distribution. C5 and C6, down the river, presented the lowest concentrations
253
and very little vertical variation. Copper concentrations were higher than TEL (18.7 mg.kg-1) 11
Journal Pre-proof in every core, and above PEL (108 mg.kg-1) in core 7 at 40 cm, with a concentration of
255
114.27 mg.kg-1. Core 7 is located in the artificial Cangurupi channel, so, it receives
256
contributions from both rivers (Caceribu and Guaxindiba), depending on the tide (Fig. 1).
257
Cu concentrations in the cores presented a very similar distribution to Zn profiles, for C2,
258
C4, C5 and C6 with the last two, closer to the river mouth having the lowest Cu
259
concentrations and small vertical variations (Fig. 5).
lP repro of
254
260
For Ni, concentrations along every core, except C5, exceeded PEL (42.8 mg.kg-1).
261
Nevertheless, Ni values in C5 were all above the TEL (15.9 mg.kg-1). Cores located in the
262
upper river presented the highest concentrations, 155.23 mg.kg-1 at the bottom of C2 and
263
158.39 mg.kg-1 at 60 cm in C3. Cores closer to the mouth (C5 and C6) exhibited the lowest
264
Ni values (Fig. 5).
265
Lead concentrations did not surpass the PEL (112 mg.kg-1) in any of the cores,
266
however, the TEL (30.2 mg.kg-1) was exceeded in every core, with the exception of the ones
267
located down the river C5 and C6, which also had little variation from bottom to top. The
268
highest Pb concentrations were found at the bottom of C3 (47.11 mg.kg-1) and in the middle
269
of C2 (58.37 mg.kg-1).
Chromium concentrations were under the TEL (52.3 mg.kg-1) and vertical profiles
271
exhibited little variation from top to bottom. Compared to the other trace metals results
272
presented so far, Cr showed a striking difference, in the sense that concentrations in the
273
cores increased from the upper river towards the mouth (Fig. 5). This may suggest a
274
different source for Cr. The highest Cr concentration was found at the top of C5 (50.11
275
mg.kg-1.). Cadmium concentrations were fairly low in all cores, however, the TEL (0.7
276
mg.kg-1) was exceeded at C1, C4 and C7, and the last two sites were under the direct
277
influence of the Caceribu River. The highest Cd values were found at C4 (0.85 and
278
0.95 mg.kg-1) at surface and 20 cm, respectively.
rna
270
Arsenic concentrations remained under the TEL (7.24 mg.kg-1), in every core and
280
had a vertical and longitudinal gradient very similar to Cr, with core concentrations
281
increasing from head to mouth. The highest concentration of As (7.10 mg.kg-1) was found in
282
C6 at 40 cm.
Jou
279
283
Mercury concentrations surpassed the TEL (0.13 mg.kg-1) in all the cores, and the
284
PEL (0.70 mg.kg-1) was exceeded in C3 with concentrations of 0.93 mg.kg-1 at 20 cm and
285
0.76 mg.kg-1 at 40 cm. The longitudinal gradient for Hg in the cores is similar to the ones
286
exhibited by most metals in this study, with cores closer to the mouth (C5 and C6) having
287
smaller concentrations, and higher values in the upper river. 12
Jou
rna
lP repro of
Journal Pre-proof
288 289
Figure 5: Vertical profile of zinc, copper, nickel, lead, chromium, cadmium, arsenic and mercury for cores C1 to C7 at the Guaxindiba river.
290
The similarities among vertical profiles of Zn, Cu, Ni, Pb and Hg, with cores closer
291
to the River mouth having the lowest concentrations suggests a common source for these
292
elements, and Spearman analysis reinforces this hypothesis, through direct and significant
293
correlation between them (Tab. 1). In the case of the afore mentioned elements, the
294
anthropogenic input may arise from the upper estuary, especially in the area of C1 to C3.
295
The influence of Caceribu waters on C4 must be also considered, because during ebb tide, 13
Journal Pre-proof its waters flow towards Guaxindiba. It should be noted, however, that concentrations of
297
trace metals found in bottom sediments from Guaxindiba were considered higher than the
298
ones found in Caceribu, in a study conducted by Porto et al. (2014). As and Cr, which had
299
similar vertical profiles, and an increasing longitudinal gradient towards the river mouth
300
seem to have a common origin, which is confirmed by a high and significant direct
301
correlation between them. The Guaxindiba river crosses the second biggest city in the state
302
of Rio de Janeiro, São Gonçalo. This city has no sewage treatment at all, and the Guaxindiba
303
River receives domestic and industrial effluents along its course, which could be an effective
304
source of trace metals.
lP repro of
296
305
It is well established that organic matter is an important controller of trace metals
306
retention in sediments. However, in the present study only Cr, As and Cd had a significant
307
correlation with total organic carbon (Tab. 1), indicating that this may be the main
308
geochemical carrier for these elements in the Guaxindiba River.
309
A Kruskall-Wallis analysis revealed significant differences for trace metals among
310
the 7 cores, except for Cd (Tab. 2), confirming the differences observed in the raw data,
311
especially for Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni, which had smaller concentrations closer to the mouth of
312
Guaxindiba. As for arsenic and chromium, the longitudinal differences in relation to the
313
other elements were noticeable.
Table 1: Spearman correlation (p<0.05) for trace metals, arsenic, total organic carbon, total nitrogen and total sulfur (significant correlations in bold). Cr
316
1.00
-0.53 1.00
Cu
Zn
As
-0.74 0.43 1.00
-0.60 0.47 0.85 1.00
Pb
0.95 -0.49 -0.76 -0.61 1.00
Jou
Cr Ni Cu Zn As Pb Hg Cd TOC TN TS
Ni
rna
314 315
14
-0.64 0.74 0.43 0.44 -0.58 1.00
Hg
-0.53 0.89 0.45 0.49 -0.47 0.61 1.00
Cd
-0.04 -0.30 0.37 0.42 0.00 -0.21 -0.23 1.00
TOC
0.61 -0.56 -0.39 -0.28 0.63 -0.86 -0.53 0.41 1.00
TN
0.55 -0.59 -0.32 -0.17 0.56 -0.82 -0.52 0.52 0.92 1.00
S 0.52 0.00 -0.31 -0.11 0.51 -0.47 -0.02 -0.01 0.51 0.38 1.00
Journal Pre-proof
318
Table 2: Results of Kruskall-Wallis (p<0.05) for cores C1 to C7. Variable
p
Cr Ni Cu Zn As Pb Hg Cd TOC TN S
0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003 0.0002 0.0019 0.0006 0.2630 0.0192 0.0300 0.0114
lP repro of
317
Table 3 shows that concentrations of Cr, Cu, Cd and Pb were similar to the values
320
encountered by Fonseca et al. (2014) and Porto et al. (2014) for the Guaxindiba River.
321
Levels of Ni and Zn, however, were higher than the ones from previous studies. In
322
comparison to Guanabara Bay (Aguiar et al., 2016), where the river discharges,
323
concentrations of trace metals were much lower, with the exception of Ni, which was more
324
elevated in the Guaxindiba River, suggesting a strong anthropogenic input of this element in
325
the upper river. Trace metal concentrations found in the Guaxindiba River were also similar
326
to the ones encountered in the industrially polluted system of Santos-S. Vicente (Hortellani
327
et al., 2008), even for Hg, with the exception of Ni, which was much higher in the study
328
area. Trace metals concentrations found in the present study were also comparable to the
329
moderately polluted Mandovi estuary (Veerasingam et al., 2015), impacted by mining
330
activities, while Guaxindiba had a much higher Zn concentration. Mean concentrations of
331
trace metals in Guaxindiba also surpassed the values found by Chatterjee et al. (2007) in the
332
Hugli estuary (India) that receives anthropogenic inputs mainly from industrial origin.
Jou
333
rna
319
15
Journal Pre-proof Table 3: Values of trace metals in sediments (mg.kg-1) from tropical and subtropical estuaries around the world. Cr
Ni
Cu
Zn
As
Cd
Pb
Hg
This study
23.7350.11
27.71158.39
32.1877.23
175.77321.01
2.12– 7.1
0.330.95
25.6158.37
0.190.93
**This study
39
72.86
48.27
224.61
5.04
0.52
34.06
0.33
**Hugli Estuary (India) Chatterjee et al. (2007)
78.5
49.6
38
180
-
Estuarine System of Santos/S. Vicente (Brasil) (Hortellani et al., 2008)
<5-97.5
1.3-44.2
-
6-312
-
<0.50.98
Vembanada wetland system Harikumar et al. (2009)
-
36.5374.47
16.7356.13
103.39305.29
-
0.07-2
**Guaxindiba river (Fonseca et al., 2014)
29
22
15.0
99
-
0.03
19.3
-
**Guaxindiba river (Porto et al., 2014)
31.8
44.6
66.6
161.2
-
0.6
34.6
-
Mandovi Estuary (India) Veerasingam et al. (2015)
145.89150.42
-
39.2357.23
57.7-71.15
-
-
22.6222.8
-
Guanabara bay (Aguiar et al., 2016)
18-297
11-41
18-423
23-698
-
-
18-287
-
**Guaxindiba riverbackground (Abuchacra, 2018)
29.4
12.6
8.6
92.1
-
-
18.3
-
Average Shale (Turekian and Wedephol, 1961)
90
68
45
95
13
0.3
20
0.4
*Thresholf effect level (TEL) *Probable Effect level (PEL)
336
lP repro of
Localization
rna
334 335
33.4
-
<2-204.8
<0.030.92 -
52.3
15.9
18.7
124
7.24
0.7
30.2
0.13
160
42.8
108
271
41.6
4.21
112
0.70
*Mac Donald et al. (1996); **mean values
The anthropogenic increase in the sediment cores in the Guaxindiba River was
338
evaluated through the use of enrichment factors (EF). Through the determination of metal
339
concentration along a 3 m core in the Guaxindiba mangrove, Abuchacra (2018) established
340
local background values for Zn, Pb, Cu, Ni and Cr (Tab. 3), which were used for the
341
calculation of EF in the present study. For As, Hg and Cd the concentrations of average
342
shale by Turekian and Wedephol (1961) were used as backgrounds. The normalization of
343
data was made with Fe concentrations obtained from this study.
Jou
337
344
Figure 6 presents the results of EF for trace metals and arsenic for the Guaxindiba
345
River. Zinc had minor enrichment in every core, except for C1 and C3 at 20 cm, considered 16
Journal Pre-proof 346
moderately enriched. Overall EF for Zn was uniform from bottom to top, and only C4 had a
347
slightly increase in EF towards the top. For Cu cores exhibited moderate enrichment (C5 and C6) and moderate severe
349
enrichment (C1, C2, C3, C4, C7). A small increase in EF from bottom to top was observed
350
for C3 and C7 but, despite that, the enrichment classification remained.
lP repro of
348
351
Variation of EF was observed for Ni. C6 was uniform from bottom to top and
352
classified as minor enrichment. C5 had a similar profile for EF, except for the top where the
353
sample was considered to have moderate enrichment. At C2 and C3, the EF increased from
354
top to bottom, changing the classification from moderate severe enrichment to severe
355
enrichment. At C4 the same increase was observed towards the bottom that was classified as
356
moderate severe enrichment.
Concerning Pb, cores were classified as minor enrichment, except for C2 at 40 cm,
358
being classified as moderate enrichment. Sediments also had minor enrichment in Cr in all
359
the cores. The same was observed for Hg in C1, C4, C5 and C6. As for C2, C3 and C7 the
360
Hg enrichment was considered minor. Among the elements studied, As was the only one
361
that showed no enrichment (Fig. 6).
Jou
rna
357
17
362 363 364
Jou
rna
lP repro of
Journal Pre-proof
Figure 6: Enrichment factors for zinc, copper, nickel, lead, chromium, cadmium, arsenic and mercury for cores C1 to C7 at the Guaxindiba River.
18
Journal Pre-proof Considering that metal enrichment in the study area has an anthropogenic origin, Cu
366
and Ni are the elements of most concern, since they had EF ranging from moderately severe
367
enrichment to severe enrichment. Nevertheless, total concentrations of trace metals do not
368
establish the real bioavailability potential. Analyzing different forms and species of a
369
particular metal gives a clearer idea about its potential accumulation, bioavailability and
370
mobility (Passos et.al. 2010). Thus labile metal complexes (with fast dissociation rate
371
constants) can therefore be used to estimate bioavailability of metals (Chakraborty et al.,
372
2014). The BCR extraction technique allows for the evaluation of metals’ bioavailability,
373
and also distinguishes elements of anthropogenic origin, from those of lithogenic origin
374
(Canuto et al., 2013, Aguiar et al., 2018). The bonding of metals from anthropogenic origin
375
usually occurs with the first three extractable fractions (F1-F3). The residual fraction (R)
376
contains primary and secondary minerals originated from natural geological formations, and
377
metals are still bonded to their crystalline structure, preventing these elements from
378
becoming bioavailable in a short period of time (Passos et al. 2010, García-Ordiales et al.
379
2016).
lP repro of
365
380
As far as bioavailability is concerned, the RAC (Risk Assessment Code) uses the
381
percentage of metal that is bonded to carbonates and presents a higher risk to biota, since
382
this is the weaker bond with sediments (Bacon and Davidson 2008; Canuto et al. 2013; De
383
Andrade Passos et al. 2011; Ikem and Adisa 2011, Aguiar et al., 2018).
In the present study, two cores were chosen to apply the BCR extraction, C3, in the
385
upper river directly under the influence of anthropogenic input, and C5, closer to the river
386
mouth and Guanabara bay salt wedge.
rna
384
Many sequential extraction approaches, including the BCR technique, have been
388
used to obtain information about the distribution of Pb in sediments (Yuan, 2004; Nemati et
389
al., 2011; Yang et al., 2012) and other matrices, such as soil (Kierczak et al., 2008; Favas et
390
al., 2011). In the present study, Pb showed a greater affinity for the reducible fraction (F2),
391
especially in C3, with over 70% of lead concentrations in F2 at the top of the core (Fig. 7).
392
In C5, concentrations in the reducible (F2) and residual (R) fractions were very close, over
393
40% in each one, except for the bottom, with 38% of Pb in R. The elevated concentrations
394
of Pb in the reducible fraction (F2) suggests that Fe-Mn oxides are involved in trapping this
395
element at pH values above 7 (Kassir et al., 2012). The highest percentage of Pb found in
396
the non-residual phase (F1-F3) suggests that Pb is potentially bioavailable in the studied
397
area. Diaz-de Alba et al. (2011) found similar results for Pb in regions impacted by human
398
activities, with concentrations that were mostly found in the labile fraction (F1). Compared
Jou
387
19
Journal Pre-proof to metals from natural origin, metals that come from anthropogenic input are more weakly
400
associated with the sediments. These elements may be released back to the aqueous phase
401
with changes in the physical and chemical conditions of the environment. The RAC for Pb
402
indicated no risk in both cores since less than 1% of the metal was bonded to the more
403
readily available soluble fraction (F1).
lP repro of
399
404
Copper was present in high concentration associated with the oxidizable fractions
405
(F3) in both cores, however, at C3 the metal showed higher affinity for F3. The decreasing
406
distribution among all fractions in C3 (top and bottom) was: oxidizable>residual > reducible
407
>
408
residual>oxidizable>reducible>soluble. Results show organic matter as a carrier for Cu in
409
the upper river, probably due to domestic anthropogenic input. Copper has a high affinity for
410
the soluble organic fraction (Wally et al., 2013) and can also bond to various forms of
411
organic matter by complexation. Copper concentrations in C3 presented low ecological risk
412
and no risk in C5 according to RAC results.
soluble
(Fig.
7).
At
C5,
the
decreasing
fractionation
order
was:
For Zn, the fractionation decreasing order was the same for C3 and C5:
414
residual>soluble>reducible>oxidizable (Fig. 7). More than 50% of Zn was concentrated in
415
the residual fraction (R), representing a lithogenic contribution and, therefore, not
416
bioavailable. The amount of Zn in the bioavailable fractions (F1-F3) was more concentrated
417
in the first fraction (F1), which covers metals that are exchangeable or associated with
418
carbonate forms and affected by pH changes. For Zn, the RAC established medium risk for
419
C3 and C5, with higher values in the core from the upper river.
rna
413
420
The dominant phase for Cr was the residual fraction (R), which accounted for more
421
than 70% in the present study at both cores. Metals associated with the residual fraction are
422
likely to be incorporated in alumino-silicate minerals (Wally et al., 2013), and are not
423
usually
424
residual>oxidizable>reducible>soluble (Fig. 7). The percentage of Cr in the soluble fraction
425
was insignificant in all the samples. According to the RAC, Cr concentrations offered no
426
ecological risk in both cores concerning the more readily available fraction (F1).
The
decreasing
content
distribution
for
Cr
was
Jou
bioavailable.
427
Nickel distribution along the sediment fractions was quite different for C3 and C5,
428
however, Ni was predominant in the residual fraction (R), with a higher percentage in C5
429
(Fig. 7). C3 had higher concentrations of Ni in the reducible (F2) and soluble fractions (F1)
430
compared to C5. The decreasing distribution of Ni in C5 was the same for top and bottom:
431
residual>oxidizable>reducible>soluble. The RAC values for Ni, established medium risk for
432
concentrations in C3 and low risk at C5. 20
Journal Pre-proof Cadmium levels were elevated in the soluble phase (F1), on the other hand,
434
concentrations in the oxidizable fraction (F3) were the lowest in both cores (Fig, 7). Low
435
levels of Cd in the organic matter and sulfides can be due to the low adsorption constant and
436
labile complex with organic matter (Baron et al., 1990). Cadmium is an element of
437
environmental concern element. Indeed, among the metals extracted with BCR technique,
438
cadmium presented the greatest concern, since the RAC results established high ecological
439
risk for Cd values in C3 and medium risk in C5. Despite its low concentrations cadmium
440
presented elevated bioavailability to biota.
lP repro of
433
Jou
rna
441
21
lP repro of
Journal Pre-proof
Figure 7: BCR results for zinc, copper, nickel, lead, chromium and cadmium.
rna
442
Considering the bioavailability, it was clear that concentrations of Ni, Zn and Cd in the
444
upper river at C3, presented higher risks as established by the RAC. The fact that
445
concentrations of organic material (TOC) were very elevated at both cores, did not help to
446
trap the elements in the oxidizable fractions with the exception of Cu.
447
Jou
443
5. Conclusions
The results obtained clarified the potential impact of dredging operations or natural
448 449
events, which are capable of mobilizing bottom sediments.
450
The water column clearly demonstrated signs of eutrophication, with hypoxia in the
451
upper river and also near the mouth, as well as a reducing environment identified by Eh
452
values.
453
Results of trace metals analysis indicated the presence of elevated concentrations
454
especially for Ni, Zn and Hg. All these elements surpassed the concentrations of probable 22
Journal Pre-proof 455
effect level and showed a higher contamination level in the upper river, tending to decrease
456
towards the mouth. The same distribution pattern was observed for Hg. The vertical profiles
457
of trace metals and arsenic did not exhibit a marked enrichment from bottom to top,
458
suggesting a constant mobilization of the sediments from the river bed. Enrichment factors revealed minor enrichment for Pb and Cr, and no enrichment for
460
As. For the other elements, sediments were found to be severely enriched in Ni and Cu.
461
Despite elevated concentrations for Zn, sediments at Guaxindiba were classified as of minor
462
enrichment for this element. Hg also presented minor enrichment at certain locations in the
463
upper river and no enrichment for the rest of the samples. Nevertheless, it is important to
464
point out that these indexes can only be considered suggestive. Their results can vary
465
depending on local conditions and the average shale or upper crust values used for
466
normalization.
lP repro of
459
467
The partitioning of sediment-associated elements as given by the sequential
468
extraction and risk assessment code results revealed an elevated bioavailability for Cd,
469
despite the fact that total concentration of this element did not exceed the PEL in any
470
sample. Even so, the Cd concentration bonded to the soluble fraction is concerning. Zn and
471
Ni, on the other hand, presented very elevated concentrations along Guaxindiba resulting in
472
medium risk in terms of bioavailability to biota, especially in the upper river.
Overall, results showed that the Guaxindiba bottom sediments have an elevated
474
anthropogenic input in terms of organic matter and trace elements, especially in the upper
475
course of the river. This poses a question of how well this river is being cared for since it is
476
located inside an official Enviromental Protection Area. Bioavailability of these elements is
477
linked mainly to the soluble fraction of sediments, the one bonded to carbonates, and in this
478
sense, Cd was the only metal that offered an elevated risk to biota.
Jou
479
rna
473
23
Journal Pre-proof 480 481 482
6. Acknowledgments This study received support from Secretaria Nacional de Portos. 7. References Abollino, O., Malandrino, N. Giacomino A., Mentasti, E. 2011. The role of chemometrics in single and sequential extraction assays: a review: Part I. Extraction procedures, uni-and bivariate techniques and multivariate variable reduction techniques for pattern recognition. Anal. Chim. Acta., 688:104-121.
487 488 489 490
Abuchacra, P.F.F., Aguiar, V.M.C., Abuchacra, R.C., Baptista Neto, J.A., Oliveira, A.S, 2015. Assessment of bioavailability and potential toxicity of Cu, Zn and Pb, a case study in Jurujuba Sound, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Marine Pollution Bulletin 100, 414–425. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.08.012
491 492 493
Abuchacra, P. F. F. 2018. Reconstituição Ambiental da Planície Costeira do Nordeste da Baía de Guanabara (RJ) a partir do Holoceno Médio e Novas Contribuições ao Debate do Antropoceno. Thesis. Departamento de Geografia. Universidade Federal Fluminense, 216p.
494 495 496
Aguiar, V. M. C., Baptista Neto, J. A. and Rangel, C. M. 2011. Eutrophication and hypoxia in four streams discharging in Guanabara Bay, RJ, Brazil, a case study. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62: 1915-1919.
497 498 499 500 501
Aguiar, V.M. de C., Lima, M.N., Abuchacra, R.C., Abuchacra, P.F.F., Baptista Neto, J.A., Borges, H.V., Oliveira, V.C. 2016. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety Ecological risks of trace metals in Guanabara Bay , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil : An index analysis approach. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 133, 306–315. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.07.012
502 503 504
Aguiar, V. M. C., Abuchacra, P. F. F., Baptista Neto. J. A., Oliveira, A. S. 2018. Environmental assessment concerning trace metals and ecological risks at Guanabara Bay, RJ, Brazil. Environ. Monit. Assess., 190, 1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6833-x.
505 506
Bader, R, G. 1955. Carbon and nitrogen relations in surface and subsurface marine sediments. Geochimica and Cosmochimica Acta 7, 205–211.
507 508
Bacon, J.R., Davidson, C.M. 2008. Is there a future for sequential chemical extraction.Analyst 133, 25–46. doi: 10.1039/b711896a
509 510 511
Baptista Neto, J.A., Gingele, F.X., Leipe, T., Brehme, I., 2006. Spatial distribution of trace elements in surficial sediments from Guanabara Bay - Rio de Janeiro/Brazil. Environ. Geol. 49, 1051-1063. doi: 10.1007/s00254-005-0149-1
512 513 514
Borrego, J.M.; Lopez; J.G.; Pendon, J.A., Morales, J. 1998. C/S Ratios in Estuarine Sediments of the Odiel River-mouth, SW Spain. Journal Coastal Research, 14(4):12761283.
515 516 517
Canuto, F.A.B., Garcia, C.A.B., Alves, J.P.H., Passos, E.A. 2013. Mobility and ecological risk assessment of trace metals in polluted estuarine sediments using a sequential extraction scheme. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185, 6173–6185. doi:10.1007/s10661-
Jou
rna
lP repro of
483 484 485 486
24
Journal Pre-proof 012-3015-0
519 520 521 522
Catanzaro, L.F., Baptista Neto, J.A., Guimarães, M.S.D., Silva, C.G. 2004. Distinctive sedimentary processes in Guanabara Bay e SE/Brazil, based on the analysis ofechocharacter (70 kHz). Rev. Bras. Geof. 22, 69-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102261X2004000100006.
523 524 525 526
Chakraborty, S.; Bhattacharya, T.; Singh, G.; Maity, J.P. 2014. Benthic Macroalgae as Biological Indicators of Heavy Metal Pollution in the Marine Environments: A Biomonitoring Approach for Pollution Assessment. Ecotox. and Environ. Safety., 100:61– 68.
527 528
Chapman, P. M., Wang, F. 2001. Assessing Sediment Contamination in Estuaries. Environ. Tox. Chem., 20, 3-22.dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620200102
529 530 531 532 533
Chatterjee, M., Silva Filho, E. V., Sarkar, S.K., Sella, S.M., Bhattacharya, A., Satpathy, K.K., Prasad, M.V.R., Chakraborty, S., Bhattacharya, B.D. 2007. Distribution and possible source of trace elements in the sediment cores of a tropical macrotidal estuary and their ecotoxicological significance. Environmental. International 33, 346–356. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.11.013
534 535 536 537
Dalrymple, R.W. 2006. Incised valleys in time and space: introduction to the volume and an examination of the controls on valley formation and filling. In: Dalrymple, R.W., Leckie, D.A., Tillman, R. (Eds.), Incised Valleys in Time and Space. SEPM Special Publication, vol. 85, pp. 5–12.
538 539 540
De Andrade Passos, E., Alves, J.D.P.H., Garcia, C.A.B., Costa, A.C.S. 2011. Metal fractionation in sediments of the Sergipe River, Northeast, Brazil. Journal of Brazilian Chemical Society 22, 828–835. doi:10.1590/S0103-50532011000500004
541 542 543 544
Diaz-de Alba, M.; Galindo-Riãno, M.D.; Casanueva-Marenco, M.J, Garcia-Vargas, M.; Kosore, C.M. 2011. Assessment of the metal pollution, potential toxicity and speciation of sediment from Algeciras Bay (South of Spain) using chemometric tools. J. .Hazar. Mat. 190:177–187.
545 546
Ductotoy, J.P. 2010. The use of biotopes in assessing the environmental quality of tidal estuaries in Europe. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Sci.,86: 317-321.
547 548
Doods, W. K. 2006. Eutrophiocation and trophic state in rivers and streams. Limnol. Oceanogr., 51, 671-680.
549 550 551
Ergin, M., Saydam, C., Basturk, O., Erdem, E., Yoruk, R. 1991. Heavy metal concentrations in surface sediments from the twocoastal inlets (Golden Horn Estuary and Izmit Bay) of the north-eastern Sea of Marmara. Chemical Geology 91, 269-285.
552 553 554
Favas, P.J.C., Pratas, J., Gomes, M.E.P; Cala, V. 2011. Selective chemical extraction of heavy metals in tailings and soils contaminated by mining activity: Environmental implications. J. Geoch. Explor. 111:160–171.
555 556 557
Ferreira, J. A., Silva, C.A., Resende, A.T. 2011. Projeto Baía Limpa: Monitoração de Ambientes Marinhos Degredados por Resíduos Sólidos na Baía de Guanabara, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Rev. Gest. Cost. Int. 11:103-113.
Jou
rna
lP repro of
518
25
Journal Pre-proof Fonseca, E.M.; Baptista Neto, J.A.; Pereira, M.P.S.; Silva, C.G.; Arantes Junior, J.D. 2014. Study of pollutant distribution in the Guaxindiba Estuarine System - SE Brazil. Mar. Poll. Bull. 82: 45-54. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.03.025
561 562 563 564
García-Ordiales, E., Covelli, S., Esbri, J. M., Loredo, J., Higueras, P. L. 2016. Sequential extraction procedure as a tool to investigate PTHE geochemistry and potential geoavailability of dam sediments (Almadén mining district, Spain). Catena, 147, 394-403. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.07.042
565 566 567 568
Ho, H.H., Swennen, R., Cappuyns, V., Vassilieva, E., Van Tran, T. 2012. Necessity of normalization to aluminum to assess the contamination by heavy metals and arsenic in sediments near Haiphong Harbor, Vietnam. J. Asian Earth Sci. 56, 229–239. doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.05.015
569 570 571
Hossain M.B., Shanta T.B.,Ahmed A.S.S.,Hossain M.K., Semme S.A. 2019. Baseline study of heavy metal contamination in the Sangu River estuary,Chattogram, Bangladesh. Marine Pollution Bulletin 140, 255–261. doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.01.058
572 573 574
Ikem, A., Adisa, S. 2011. Runoff effect on eutrophic lake water quality and heavy metal distribution in recent littoral sediment. Chemosphere, 82, 259–267. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.048
575 576 577 578
Kassir, L. N; Darwish, T., Shaban, A.; Olivier, G.; Naim, O. 2012. Mobility and bioavailability of selected trace elements in Mediterranean red soil amended with phosphate fertilizers: Experimental study. Geoderma. 190:357-368. doi: 0.1016/j.geoderma.2012.05.017
579 580 581
Kierczak, J. C.; Neel, U.; Aleksander-Kwaterczak, E.; Helios-Rybicka, H.; Puziewicz, J., 2008. Solid speciation and mobility of potentially toxic elements from natural and contaminated soils: A combined approach. Chemosphere. 73:776–784.
582 583 584
Long, E.R., MacDonald, D.D., 1998. Recommended uses of empirically derived, sediment quality guidelines for marine and estuarine ecosystems. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 4, 1019– 1039.
585 586 587
MacDonald, D.D., Carr, S., Clader, F.D., Long, E.D., Ingersoll, C.G., 1996. Development and evaluation of sediment quality guidelines for Florida coastal waters. Ecotoxicology 5, 253–278.
588 589 590
Maranho, L. A.; Abreu, I.; Santelli, R.; Cordeiro, R. C.; Soares-Gomes, A.; Moreira, L. B.; Morais, R. D.; Abessa, D. M. S. 2009. Sediment toxicity assessment of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J. Coast Res. 56: 851 – 855.
591 592 593
Nemati, K.; Abu Bakar, N. K.; Abas, M. R.; Sobhanzadeh, E. 2011. Speciation of heavy metals by modified BCR sequential extraction procedure in different depths of sediments from Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia. J. Haz. Mat. 192:402–410.
594 595 596
Okbah, M.A., Nasr, S.M., Soliman, N.F., Khairy, M.A., 2014. Distribution and Contamination Status of Trace Metals in the Mediterranean Coastal Sediments, Egypt. Soil Sediment Contam. 23, 656–676.
597 598
Okoro, H.K.; Fatoki, O.S.; Adekola, F.A., Ximba, B.J., Snyma, R.G. 2012. A Review of Sequential Extraction Procedures for Heavy Metals Speciation in Soil and Sediments, 1:181.
Jou
rna
lP repro of
558 559 560
26
Journal Pre-proof Pan, K., Wang, W.X. 2011. Trace metal contamination inestuarine and coastal environments in China. Sci. Total Environ., 421: 3-16.
601 602 603
Passos, E.A.; Alves, J.C.; Santos, I.S., Patrocínio, J. H.A., Garcia, C.A.B.; Costa, A.C.S. 2010. Assessment of trace metals contamination in estuarine sediments using a sequential extraction technique and principal component analysis.Microchem. J., 96, 50-57.
604 605 606
Passos, E. A., Alves, J. P. H., Garcia, C. A. B., Costa, A. C. S. (2011). Metal Fractionation in Sediments of the Sergipe River, Northeast Brazil. Journal of Brazilian Chemical Society, 22, 5, 828-835.
607 608 609
Pessoa, A.P.L. 2011. Estudo da Remobilização de Metais de Sedimentos Contaminados na Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Minho. Dissertation. Departamento de Engenharia Química. Universidade do Porto, 38 p.
610 611 612 613
Porto, L.J.L., Almeida, C.N.; Dezotti, M.W. C., Correa J. A. M., Faial K. C.F., Faial K.R.F. 2014. Distribuição de metais pesados nos sedimentos de fundo dos rios Caceribu e Guaxindiba, afluentes da Baía de Guanabara – Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Geochim. Bras., 28:171-188.
614 615
Pritchard, D. W. 1967. What is an estuary: a physical viewpoint. American Association for the Advancement of Science 83, 3–5
616 617 618 619
Soares-Gomes, A., Gama, B.A.P., Baptista Neto J.A., Freire, D.G., Cordeiro, R.C., Machado, W., Bernardes, M.C., Coutinho, R., Thompson, F.L., Pereira, R.C. 2016. An environmental overview of Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro. Regional Studies in Marine Science 8: 319–330.
620 621
Turekian, K. K. and Wedepohl, K. H. 1961. Distribution of elements in some major units of the earth´s crust. Geological Society of American Bulletin, 72: 175 -192.
622 623 624
Udofia, G. E., Essien, J. P., Eduok, S. I, Akpan, B. P. 2009. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals by yeasts from Qua Iboe estuary mangrove sediment, Nigeria. African journal of Microbiology Research, 3 (12), 862-869.
625 626 627 628 629
Ure, A.M., Quevaullier, P., Muntau, H., Griepink, B. 1993. Speciation of Heavy Metals in Soils and Sediments. An Account of the Improvement and Harmonization of Extraction Techniques Undertaken Under the Auspices of the BCR of the Commission of the European Communities. International Journal of Enviromental Analytical Chemistry, 51, 135–151. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03067319308027619
630 631 632
USEPA 1997. United States Environmental protection Agency – USEPA. Test methods for evaluating solid wastes, SW-846, Final Update 3. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC.
633 634 635 636
Veerasingam, S., Vethamony, P., Mirali, R. M., Fernandes, B. 2015. Depositional Record of trace metals and degree of contamination in core sediments from the Mondovi estuarine mangrove ecosystem, West coast. Mar. Poll. Bull., 91, 362367.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.11.045
637 638
Wally, O.S.D.; Critchley, A.T., Hiltz, D.; Craigie. J.S.; Han, X.;, Zaharia, L.I.; ABRAMS, S.R., Prithiviraj, B. 2013. Regulation of phytohormone biosynthesis and accumulation in
Jou
rna
lP repro of
599 600
27
Journal Pre-proof Arabidopsis following treatment with commercial extract from the marine macroalga Ascophyllum nodosum. J. of Plant Growth Reg. 32: 324–339.
641 642 643
Yang, L.S.; Zhang, X.W., Li, Y.H., Li, H.R; Wang; Y., Wang. W. Y. 2012. Bioaccessability and risk assessment of cadmium from uncooked rice using an in vitro digestion model. Bio. Trace Elem. Res. 145: 81-86.
644 645 646
Yao, Q; Wang, X; Jian, H; Chen, H; Yu, Z. 2015. Characterization of the Particle Size Fraction associated with Heavy Metals in Suspended Sediments of the Yellow River. Toscano WA, ed. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 12:6725-6744.
647 648 649
Yin, K., Lin, Z., Ke, Z. 2004. Temporal and spatial distribution of dissolved oxygen in the Pearl River Estuary and adjacent coastal waters. Continental Shelf Research, 24, 1935-1948. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2004.06.017.
650 651 652
Yuan, C.; Shi, J.; He, B.; Liu, J.; Liang, L.; Jiang, G. 2004. Speciation of heavy metals in marine sediments from the East China Sea by ICP-MS with sequential extraction. Environ. Int. 30:769–783.
Jou
rna
lP repro of
639 640
28
Jou
rna
lP repro of
Journal Pre-proof
Jou
rna
lP repro of
Journal Pre-proof
Jou
rna
lP repro of
Journal Pre-proof