The American Journal of Pathology, Vol. 180, No. 2, February 2012 Copyright © 2012 American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.11.001
Cardiovascular, Pulmonary, and Renal Pathology
Autophagy Guards Against Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury
Atsushi Takahashi,* Tomonori Kimura,* Yoshitsugu Takabatake,* Tomoko Namba,* Junya Kaimori,† Harumi Kitamura,* Isao Matsui,* Fumio Niimura,‡ Taiji Matsusaka,§ Naonobu Fujita,¶ Tamotsu Yoshimori,¶ Yoshitaka Isaka,* and Hiromi Rakugi* From the Departments of Geriatric Medicine and Nephrology,* Advanced Technology for Transplantation,† and Genetics,¶ Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka; and the Department of Pediatrics,‡ and the Institute of Medical Science and Department of Internal Medicine,§ Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
Autophagy is a highly conserved bulk protein degradation pathway involved in cellular homeostasis. Although emerging evidence indicates involvement of autophagy in various conditions, efforts to clarify the role of autophagy in renal tubules are beginning to be elucidated. In the present study, we examined the hypothesis that autophagy guards against acute kidney injury (AKI) by modulating several deteriorative pathways that lead to tubular cell death using a cisplatin-induced model of AKI. Cisplatin treatment of GFP-LC3 (green fluorescent protein–microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3) transgenic mice induced autophagy in kidney proximal tubules in a time-dependent manner. Proximal tubule–specific autophagy-deficient mice exhibited more severe cisplatin-induced AKI than did control mice, as assessed via kidney function and morphologic findings. In addition, cisplatin induced more severe DNA damage and p53 activation, concomitant with an increase in apoptotic cell number, and a massive accumulation of protein aggregates in autophagy-deficient proximal tubules. Cisplatin treatment significantly increased reactive oxygen species–producing damaged mitochondria in immortalized autophagy-deficient proximal tubular cells when compared with autophagyretrieved control cells. In conclusion, autophagy guards kidney proximal tubules against AKI, possibly by alleviating DNA damage and reactive oxygen species production and by eliminating toxic protein aggregates. Enhancing autophagy may provide a novel
therapeutic option to minimize AKI. (Am J Pathol 2012, 180:517–525; DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.11.001)
Macroautophagy (referred to as autophagy) is a highly conserved bulk protein degradation pathway involved in the turnover of long-lived proteins, damaged organelles, and aggregation-prone proteins.1– 4 In the initial step of this process, parts of the cytoplasm and cellular organelles are engulfed in a double-membrane vesicle called an autophagosome. This autophagosome fuses with lysosomes, resulting in degradation of the sequestered materials by various lysosomal hydrolytic enzymes. This degradation is followed by generation of amino acids, which are then recycled for macromolecular synthesis and energy production. Although a low level of constitutive autophagy occurring under physiologic conditions fulfills cellular homeostatic functions such as protein and organelle turnover, autophagy is up-regulated in various pathologic conditions to remove damaged cytoplasmic components, and thereby guards against the diseased conditions. Accumulating evidence has suggested that autophagic deficiency is associated with various diseases such as neurodegeneration, cancer, and liver disease.3 Although autophagy in the kidney was first described in the 1970s,5,6 efforts to clarify the role of autophagy in renal tubules are just beginning. Up-regulation of autophagy in the kidney has been observed in several animal experimental models including ischemia-reperfusion injury,7–9 cisplatin nephropathy,10,11 cyclosporine nephropathy,12 and protein overload13; however, findings of some of these studies are contradictory insofar as the Supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (22590890 to H.K.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. Accepted for publication November 1, 2011. A.T., T.K., and Y.T. contributed equally to this work. Supplemental material for this article can be found on http://ajp. amjpathol.org or at doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.11.001. Address reprint requests to Yoshitaka Isaka, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Geriatric Medicine and Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine (B6), 2-2, Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, Japan. E-mail: isaka@ kid.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
517
518 Takahashi et al AJP February 2012, Vol. 180, No. 2
role of autophagy in the kidney. Although autophagy is a double-edged sword, that is, while autophagy is basically cytoprotective, in some context it could directly contribute to cell death (autophagic cell death),14 this conflict may be due to the use of “autophagy inhibitors.” As suggested by the guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy in mammals, most chemical inhibitors of autophagy are not entirely specific and could induce potential adverse effects, which may lead to incorrect interpretation of the role of autophagy.4 To assess the role of autophagy more strictly in the kidney, we recently generated renal proximal tubule–specific autophagy-deficient mice and demonstrated that autophagy protects proximal tubular cells against ischemiareperfusion injury.9 These mice enabled us to examine the role of autophagy in proximal tubules, which are exposed to multiple insults. In the present study, we used a model of cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) in which genotoxicity,15 p53 activation,16,17 and reactive oxygen species (ROS)18 are involved in the development of nephrotoxicity. Several recent reports have demonstrated that autophagy involves stabilization of DNA and suppression of genome damage.19,20 Recent advances in the field of redox regulation of autophagy are focused on the role of mitochondria as a source of ROS and on autophagy as a means for clearance of ROS.21–23 In addition, autophagy has been demonstrated to be upregulated in cisplatin-induced AKI and other kidney diseases; however, the precise mechanism of autophagy in cisplatin nephrotoxicity, in particular, in vivo, remains to be elucidated. We investigated the proximal tubule–specific role of autophagy in AKI using a model of cisplatininduced nephrotoxicity and proximal tubule–specific autophagy-deficient mice.
pression reflects Cre activity, exhibited LacZ-positive tubules in the cortex and the outer medulla, whereas LacZpositive tubules were absent in female mice. Therefore, only male mice were used in the present study. The mice were allowed free access to water and standard mouse chow. All animal experiments were approved by the institutional committee of the Animal Research Committee of Osaka University and the Japanese Animal Protection and Management Law (No. 25).
Drug Administration Cisplatin (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis MO) was dissolved in saline solution at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. Mice received a single intraperitoneal injection of either cisplatin (15, 17.5, or 20 mg/kg body weight) or vehicle (saline solution).
Antibodies Antibodies used included the following: antibodies for megalin; phospho-histone H2AX (Ser139) (referred to as ␥-H2AX) (Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA); p53 (Abcam, Ltd., Cambridge, England); LC3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Beverly, MA); Atg5 (MBL, Inc., Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan); -actin (Sigma-Aldrich Corp.); p62 (C-terminal-specific; Progen Biotechnik GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany); ubiquitin (Cell Signaling Technology); Alexa 488- and Alexa 555-conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR); biotinylated secondary antibodies (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA); and horseradish peroxidase– conjugated secondary antibodies (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark).
Histologic Analysis Materials and Methods Animals GFP-LC3 (green fluorescent protein–microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3) transgenic mice have been described previously.24 Mice were crossed with C57BL/6N Crj mice over 10 generations, and were maintained as heterozygotes for the GFP-LC3 transgene. Atg5F/F:KAP mice have been described previously.9 In brief, we first generated a transgenic mouse that expresses Cre recombinase under control of the promoter of KAP, the kidney androgen-regulated protein gene (KAP-Cre transgenic mice). The KAP-Cre mice were used after backcrossing with C57BL/6N Crj mice more than 10 times. We then crossed the KAP-Cre transgenic mice with mice bearing an Atg5flox allele (Atg5F/F mice), in which exon 3 of the Atg5 gene is flanked by two loxP sequences. In a previous study,9 Western blot analysis demonstrated efficient knockout of the Atg5 protein in Atg5F/F:KAP mice (84.2% reduction in kidney cortex homogenates in 8-week-old mice). All experiments were performed using 8-week-old male mice. In our previous report, the KAPCre/CAG-CAT-Z male mice, in which -galactosidase ex-
Mice were transcardially perfused using 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4). Removed kidneys were sectioned, post-fixed in paraformaldehyde, and embedded in paraffin or frozen in OCT compound (Sakura Finetek USA, Inc., Torrance, CA). To assess dots positive for green fluorescent protein (GFP), post-fixed frozen tissue was sectioned and immunostained with megalin (proximal tubular cell maker). GFP-LC3 dots per proximal tubule in at least 10 high-power fields (⫻1058) were counted at each time point. In evaluation of PAS-stained sections, tubular damage was graded semiquantitatively on the basis of the percentage of damaged tubules, as follows: 0, no damage; 1, less than 25% damage; 2, 25% to 50% damage; 3, 50% to 75% damage; 4, 75% to 90% damage; and 5, more than 90% damage. Tubular damage was defined as cell necrosis, tubular dilatation, and cast formation. At least 10 high-power fields (⫻400) were reviewed for each tissue. Immunohistochemical staining for ␥-H2AX, p53, p62, and ubiquitin (co-stained with megalin) was performed on paraffin-embedded sections after antigen retrieval via autoclaving in 0.01 mmol/L citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 10 minutes at 120°C and blocking with 1.5% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich Corp.) in PBS for 60 minutes. Sections were incubated with pri-
Autophagy in Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity 519 AJP February 2012, Vol. 180, No. 2
mary antibodies at 4°C overnight. Except for p53, sections were then incubated with Alexa 488- and Alexa 555-conjugated secondary antibodies for 30 minutes at room temperature. Immunofluorescence images were obtained using a laser confocal microscope (Leica TCP SP5; Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). For double staining for p53 and megalin, p53 was first visualized using a horseradish peroxidase– diaminobenzidine compound (Nichirei Corp., Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan), followed by detection of megalin using alkaline phosphatase and NBT/BCIP Stock Solution (Roche Diagnostics, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland). In all quantitative or semiquantitative analyses of histologic staining, at least 10 highpower fields were reviewed for each tissue by two nephrologists (T.K. and Y.T.) in a blinded manner.
Western Blot Analysis Western blot analysis was conducted as described previously.28 In brief, whole-cell lysates were extracted in lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology), and protein concentration was determined using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Reagent (Thermo Scientific Pierce Protein Research Products, Rockford, IL). An equal amount (15 g) of protein lysates was loaded in each lane and separated using 12% SDS-PAGE. Then the gels were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Membranes were incubated with anti-LC3, Atg5, and -actin primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. After incubation with horseradish peroxidase– conjugated secondary antibodies, detection was performed using Super Signal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scientific).
TUNEL Staining
Statistical Analysis
Apoptotic cells were detected using the TUNEL assay with an in situ apoptosis detection kit (Takara Bio Inc., Tokyo, Japan). In brief, paraffin-embedded renal tissue sections were deparaffinized and incubated with 10 g/mL Proteinase K (Roche Diagnostics) for 15 minutes at room temperature. The sections were then exposed to terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase labeling reaction mixture for 90 minutes, followed by incubation with antiFITC– horseradish peroxidase conjugate for 30 minutes in a 37°C humidified chamber. Finally, the sections were reacted with diaminobenzidine.
All results are given as mean ⫾ SE. Statistical analyses were conducted using JMP software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Multiple-group comparisons were performed using analysis of variance with post-testing using the Tukey-Kramer test. P ⬍ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Biochemical Measurements The serum urea nitrogen concentration was measured using the BUN-test-Wako (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan), and the creatinine concentration was determined using the CRE-EN Kainos Kit (Kainos Laboratories, Inc., Tokyo, Japan).
In Vitro Analysis Atg5-deficient proximal tubular cells were isolated from 3-week-old Atg5F/F:KAP mice using the CELLection Biotin Binder Kit (Invitrogen Corp.) and biotinylated Lotus tetragonolobu agglutinin (Vector Laboratories) as described previously.9 Immortalized cell lines were established by transformation using pEF321-T, an SV-40 large T antigen expression vector. cDNA from Atg5 mice was subcloned from pCI-neo-mApg5 (plasmid 22956; Addgene, Inc., Cambridge, MA).25 The subcloned cDNA fragment was cloned into pMRX-IRES-bsr. Stable cell lines restoring Atg5 were generated using a retroviral expression system with Plat-E cells as described previously.26,27 Stable transformants were selected using blasticidin. Cell viability was assessed via trypan blue staining. Mitochondrial ROS production was detected using MitoSOX Red (Invitrogen Corp.). According to the manufacturer’s instructions, cells were reacted with 5 mol/L MitoSOX Red for 10 minutes at 37°C with or without cisplatin (50 mol/L).
Results Cisplatin Induces Autophagy in Kidney Proximal Tubules in Vivo To confirm the induction of autophagy in proximal tubular cells after cisplatin administration, we used transgenic mice expressing GFP-LC3. GFP-positive dots reflect autophagosomes because transgene GFP-LC3 under the control of constitutive CAG promoter produces nearly equivalent amounts of endogenous LC3.24 A single intraperitoneal administration of 15 mg/kg cisplatin induced an obvious accumulation of GFP-LC3 dots as early as 6 hours, and they increased in a time-dependent manner, peaking at day 3, whereas GFP-LC3 dots were rarely observed in the vehicle-treated GFP-LC3 transgenic mice (Figure 1, A and B). Co-immunostaining with megalin, a marker of proximal tubular cells, indicated that GFPLC3 dots were localized in the proximal tubules. These results demonstrate that cisplatin induces autophagy in proximal tubules in vivo.
Autophagy Deficiency Affects Kidney Morphology and Function after Cisplatin Administration After proving that cisplatin induces autophagy in proximal tubular cells, we examined the effect of autophagy deficiency on kidney morphology and function during cisplatin nephrotoxicity using the proximal tubule–specific Atg5-deficient mice (Atg5F/F:KAP mice). PAS staining demonstrated that, compared with control Atg5F/F mice, Atg5F/F:KAP mice exhibited severe loss of brush border, tubular dilatation, and cast formation at 3 days
A
&LVSODWLQ 9HKLFOH
K
K
K
/&
1XPEHURI/& GRWV SUR[LPDOWXEXOH
520 Takahashi et al AJP February 2012, Vol. 180, No. 2
B
9HKLFOH K
K
K GD\ GD\ GD\ GD\ 7LPHFRXUVH
0HUJH
&LVSODWLQ GD\
GD\
GD\
/&
GD\
Figure 1. Induction of autophagy in proximal tubules of GFPLC3 transgenic mice after administration of cisplatin. GFP-LC3 transgenic mice were intraperitoneally injected with either vehicle (saline solution) or cisplatin (15 mg/kg). At the indicated time points, renal tissues were collected. A: Kidney sections were immunostained for megalin, a marker of proximal tubules (red) and for DAPI (blue) for counterstaining. B: The number of GFP-LC3 dots per proximal tubule at each time point was counted in at least 10 high-power fields (⫻1058). GFP-LC3 dots were observed 6 hours after cisplatin treatment and increased in a time-dependent manner, peaking at day 3. Data are given as mean ⫾ SE. Original magnification, ⫻1058. Images are representative of multiple experiments.
0HUJH
after the 15-mg/kg dose of cisplatin (Figure 2A). Semiquantitative assessment of the severity of the tubular injury demonstrated that Atg5F/F:KAP mice exhibited significantly higher injury than did Atg5F/F mice (3.9 ⫾ 0.3 versus 1.7 ⫾ 0.3, respectively; P ⬍ 0.05; Figure 2B). We next assessed kidney function at 3 days after administration of various dosages of cisplatin. Kidney function was significantly deteriorated in the 15-mg/kg dose of cisplatin-treated Atg5F/F:KAP mice compared with that of cisplatin-treated Atg5F/F mice, as assessed using serum urea nitrogen concentrations (105 ⫾ 4 mg/dL versus 63 ⫾ 13 mg/dL, respectively; P ⬍ 0.05) and serum creatinine concentrations (1.0 ⫾ 0.2 mg/dL versus 0.4 ⫾ 0.1 mg/dL, respectively; P ⬍ 0.05) (Figure 2C). Similar data were obtained when cisplatin was administered at a dose of 17.5 mg/kg; however, the 20-mg/kg dose of cisplatin caused such severe damage that differences between Atg5F/F:KAP mice and Atg5F/F mice were not observed as assessed using kidney function and morphologic findings (see Supplemental Figure S1 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org).
Autophagy Deficiency Augments DNA Damage, p53 Activation, and Apoptosis after Cisplatin Administration We next investigated the extent of DNA damage in the proximal tubule–specific autophagy-deficient kidney, one of the major mechanisms in cisplatin nephrotoxicity. DNA damage in renal tubular cells was assessed via immuno-
staining for ␥-H2AX. Administration of 15 mg/kg cisplatin increased ␥-H2AX–positive nuclei significantly in the proximal tubules in Atg5F/F:KAP mice compared with Atg5F/F mice, whereas they were rarely observed in vehicle-treated Atg5F/F:KAP or Atg5F/F mice (Figure 3A; see also Supplemental Figure S2A at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). Inasmuch as severe DNA damage leads to p53 activation and apoptotic cell death, we performed immunostaining for p53 and TUNEL staining. The number of p53-positive proximal tubular cells significantly increased in Atg5F/F: KAP mice compared with Atg5F/F mice at 3 days after cisplatin injection (Figures 3B; see also Supplemental Figure S2B at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). The number of TUNEL-positive apoptotic tubular cells increased significantly in Atg5F/F:KAP mice compared with Atg5F/F mice at 3 days after cisplatin injection (Figure 3C).
Autophagy Protects Proximal Tubular Cells by Eliminating ROS-Producing Mitochondria during Cisplatin Treatment To examine the role of autophagy on cell survival and mitochondrial injury after cisplatin treatment in vitro, we established immortalized Atg5-deficient renal proximal tubular cells (Atg5-negative PTCs) isolated from Atg5F/F: KAP mice. As a control, we generated Atg5-positive PTCs by stably transfecting pMRX-IRES-Atg5-bsr (Atg5-expressing retroviral vector cassette) to Atg5-negative PTCs. Western blot analyses confirmed retrieval of Atg5 expression and recovery of autophagic activity assessed
Autophagy in Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity 521 AJP February 2012, Vol. 180, No. 2
A
9HKLFOH
against the mitochondrial ROS production in proximal tubular cells during cisplatin nephrotoxicity. Cisplatin-treated Atg5-negative or Atg5-positive PTCs were stained with MitoSOX Red, which exhibits red fluorescence when oxidized by ROS. Exposure to 50 mol/L cisplatin for 12 hours significantly increased intracellular MitoSOX Red oxidation in Atg5-negative PTCs when compared with Atg5-positive PTCs (Figure 4, C and D). These results suggested that autophagy protects proximal tubular cells by eliminating ROS-producing mitochondria during cisplatin treatment.
&LVSODWLQ
))
)).$3
Formation of Protein Aggregates in AutophagyDeficient Proximal Tubules after Cisplatin Administration
B 3$6LQMXU\VFRUH
))
Inasmuch as some studies have indicated that autophagy deficiency leads to accumulation of p62-positive and ubiquitin-positive protein aggregates in several organs, we performed immunohistochemical analysis for p62 and ubiquitin. Massive accumulation of p62-positive and ubiquitin-positive aggregates was observed in proximal tubular cells of Atg5F/F:KAP mice at 3 days after administration of 15 mg/kg cisplatin, whereas they were rarely detected in cisplatin-treated Atg5F/F mice (Figure 5, A and B).
)).$3
᧦
9HKLFOH
&LVSODWLQ
Discussion ))
))
)).$3
᧦
9HKLFOH &LVSODWLQ
&UHDWLQLQHPJG/
8UHDQLWURJHQPJG/
C 1.5
)).$3
᧦
1 0.5 0 9HKLFOH &LVSODWLQ
Figure 2. Marked exacerbation of kidney morphology and function in proximal tubule–specific autophagy-deficient mice after cisplatin treatment. A and B: Light microscopic analysis of cortical region of the kidneys at 3 days after injection of vehicle (saline solution) or cisplatin (15 mg/kg) (n ⫽ 4 to 7). A: PAS-stained renal cortical region of Atg5F/F:KAP mice exhibited more severe loss of brush border, tubular dilatation, and cast formation compared with that of Atg5F/F mice after cisplatin treatment. Original magnification, ⫻400. B: Tubular injury score of Atg5F/F:KAP mice exhibited significantly higher injury compared with that of Atg5F/F mice after cisplatin treatment. C: Cisplatin treatment caused a significant increase in serum urea nitrogen (left) and serum creatinine (right) concentrations in Atg5F/F:KAP mice compared with Atg5F/F mice. Data are given as mean ⫾ SE. Statistically significant differences (*P ⬍ 0.05) are indicated. F/F, Atg5F/F mice; F/F:KAP, Atg5F/F:KAP mice. Images are representative of multiple experiments.
via LC3-I–LC3-II transition (Figure 4A). Treatment with cisplatin for 12 hours tended to decrease cell survival of Atg5-positive PTCs (Figure 4B). Of interest, Atg5-negative PTCs were vulnerable to cisplatin toxicity when compared with Atg5-positive PTCs. Because cisplatin was reported to induce mitochondrial dysfunction and increase ROS production via the disrupted respiratory chain, we investigated whether autophagy could guard
Findings of the present study provide clear and convincing evidence that autophagy has a protective role against AKI by alleviating DNA damage and mitochondrial injury in proximal tubule–specific autophagy-deficient mice. Furthermore, we observed that the autophagy-deficient proximal tubular cells exhibited aberrant activation of p53 signaling and subsequent increase of apoptosis, and accumulation of protein aggregates during cisplatin-induced AKI, which will provide new knowledge about the mechanism of the renoprotective role of autophagy. Although previous studies have suggested up-regulation of autophagy in the cisplatin-induced model of AKI,10,11 it has been controversial whether autophagy has protective effects against cisplatin-induced AKI. One study has suggested a cytoprotective and prosurvival role for autophagy during cisplatin treatment of proximal tubular cells by demonstrating that blockade of autophagy using pharmacologic inhibitors (3-methyladenine or bafilomycin) or short hairpin RNA for beclin increased tubular cell apoptosis during cisplatin treatment.10 However, it has been proposed that their potential adverse effects must be considered in interpretation when using autophagy inhibitors because most chemical inhibitors of autophagy are not entirely specific.4 To enable a more direct assessment of the resulting phenotype, we used kidney proximal tubule–specific autophagy-deficient mice in this experiment, which we recently established using the Cre-LoxP system, and demonstrated that autophagy has a homeostatic role in proximal tubular cells.9 In the present study, we provided
522 Takahashi et al AJP February 2012, Vol. 180, No. 2
9HKLFOH ))
&LVSODWLQ
)).$3
))
)) 1XPEHURIˠ+$;SRVLWLYH SUR[LPDOWXEXODUFHOOVKSI
A
)).$3
ˠ+$;
0HUJH
)).$3
᧦
9HKLFOH &LVSODWLQ 9HKLFOH
&LVSODWLQ 1XPEHURISSRVLWLYH SUR[LPDOWXEXODUFHOOVKSI
B ))
)).$3
))
)).$3
᧦
9HKLFOH &LVSODWLQ 9HKLFOH
&LVSODWLQ
))
)).$3
)) 1XPEHURI781(/ SRVLWLYHFHOOVKSI
C
)).$3
᧦
9HKLFOH &LVSODWLQ Figure 3. Increase in DNA damage, p53 activation, and apoptosis in autophagy-deficient kidney proximal tubules after cisplatin treatment. Atg5F/F:KAP mice and Atg5F/F mice were intraperitoneally injected with either vehicle (saline solution) or cisplatin (15 mg/kg), and were sacrificed 3 days later (n ⫽ 4 to 7). A: Immunohistochemical analysis for phospho-histone H2AX (Ser139) (␥-H2AX), a DNA damage marker. Megalin was co-stained in red as a marker of proximal tubules. After cisplatin treatment, the number of ␥-H2AX–positive proximal tubular cells in Atg5F/F:KAP mice was significantly higher than in Atg5F/F mice. B: Immunohistochemical analysis for p53. Megalin was co-stained in blue. After cisplatin treatment, the number of p53-positive proximal tubular cells in Atg5F/F:KAP mice was significantly higher than in Atg5F/F mice. C: Assessment of apoptotic cells via TUNEL staining. After cisplatin treatment, the number of TUNEL-positive cells in Atg5F/F:KAP mice was significantly increased compared with that in Atg5F/F mice. Original magnification: ⫻1058 (A); ⫻1000 (B); ⫻400 (C). Positive cell counts were determined using confocal microscopy (␥-H2AX; ⫻352 magnification; see Supplemental Figure S2A at http://ajp.amjpathol.org) (A) or light microscopy (p53; ⫻400 magnification; see Supplemental Figure S2B at http://ajp.amjpathol.org) (B) and TUNEL (⫻400) (C) from 10 high-power fields (hpf). Data are given as mean ⫾ SE. Statistically significant differences (*P ⬍ 0.05) are indicated. F/F, Atg5F/F mice; F/F:KAP, Atg5F/F:KAP mice. Images are representative of multiple experiments.
clear evidence that the proximal tubule-specific autophagy-deficient mice exhibited more severe injury after cisplatin treatment as assessed by kidney function and morphologic findings. We believe that our observation settles the controversy about the role of autophagy during cisplatin nephrotoxicity; that is, autophagy has a protective role against cisplatin-induced AKI.
Clinical use of cisplatin, one of most potent chemotherapeutic agents, has been substantially restricted because of its nephrotoxic effects. Renal microenvironmental changes after cisplatin treatment is a complex process, and the mechanism for cisplatin-associated nephrotoxicity has not been completely elucidated; however, many theories have been developed, including i) DNA
Autophagy in Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity 523 AJP February 2012, Vol. 180, No. 2
A /&, /&,, $WJ βDFWLQ
B
$WJ
$WJ
᧦
&HOOYLDELOLW\
᧦
˩0
˩0
˩0
˩0
&LVSODWLQ
C
9HKLFOH
&LVSODWLQ˩0
$WJ
$WJ
$WJ
$WJ
0LWR62;
0HUJH
D 5HODWLYHLQWHQVLW\ RIIOXRUHVHQVH
$WJ
$WJ
᧦
9HKLFOH
&LVSODWLQ
Figure 4. The effects of autophagy deficiency on cell viability and mitochondrial ROS production in proximal tubular cells after cisplatin treatment in vitro. A: Western blot analysis of Atg5 and LC3. Retrieval of Atg5 and LC3-I-LC3-II transition were confirmed in Atg5⫹ PTCs. B: Analysis of cell survival demonstrated that higher dosages of cisplatin treatment significantly decreased viability of Atg5⫺ PTCs compared with Atg5⫹ PTCs. C and D: Exposure to 50 mol/L cisplatin for 12 hours significantly increased intracellular MitoSOX Red oxidation in Atg5⫺ PTCs compared with Atg5⫹ PTCs. Data are given as mean ⫾ SE. Statistically significant differences (*P ⬍ 0.05) are indicated. C: Original magnification, ⫻200. Atg5 (⫹), Atg5⫹ PTCs; Atg5 (⫺), Atg5⫺ PTCs. Images are representative of multiple experiments.
damage and subsequent p53 activation, ii) apoptotic pathways via intrinsic mitochondrial damage or extrinsic death receptor activation, and iii) oxidative stress.29 This study may answer some of the questions about how autophagy
attenuates cisplatin-induced signaling pathways that lead to tubular cell injury or death. One of the remarkable findings of this study is that the autophagy-deficient proximal tubules exhibited a substantial increase in DNA damage during cisplatin nephrotoxicity, as assessed via immunostaining for ␥-H2AX, a marker of DNA damage.30,31 One of the proposed mechanisms in cisplatin nephrotoxicity is that cisplatin crosslinks genomic DNA after aquation into a highly reactive form, which leads to distortion of the duplex structure.32–34 The DNA damage signal is then relayed to activation of p53, which then induces apoptotic cell death of renal tubular cells, in part via mitochondrial injury.16,17 Of note, several recent reports have demonstrated that autophagy involves suppression of genome damage and that autophagy dysfunction leads to tumorigenesis.19,35 Our data demonstrate that DNA damage, p53 activation, and apoptosis are exacerbated in cisplatin-treated proximal tubule–specific autophagy-deficient kidneys compared with control kidneys, which supports the hypothesis that autophagy protects renal tubular cells against cisplatin nephrotoxicity by attenuating DNA damage. Another important finding is that autophagy deficiency in renal proximal tubular cells enhanced cisplatin-induced ROS production from mitochondria, thereby resulting in cell death. Cisplatin is proposed to induce mitochondrial dysfunction and increase ROS production, an important factor contributing to nephrotoxicity.36,37 Several recent reports have demonstrated that autophagy has an essential role in the control of mitochondrial quality by eliminating damaged mitochondria, which is referred to as mitophagy.21–23 Indeed, we have recently demonstrated that morphologically abnormal mitochondria gradually increased in the proximal tubule– specific autophagy-deficient mice.9 In the present study, exposure to cisplatin substantially increased mitochondrial ROS production in Atg5-deficient proximal tubular cells compared with Atg5-expressing control cells, demonstrating that autophagy eliminates ROS-producing damaged mitochondria during cisplatin nephrotoxicity, presumably through mitophagy. In relation to DNA damage, increased mitochondrial ROS may target and modify genomic DNA, which may eventually enhance the susceptibility to genomic stress by cisplatin-DNA adducts.22 It is noteworthy that autophagy deficiency induced accumulation of p62-positive and ubiquitin-positive aggregates in proximal tubular cells after cisplatin treatment. Similar observations have been demonstrated in chronic settings in autophagy-deficient liver,38 neurons,39,40 heart,41 and kidneys9 and in the acute setting in autophagy-deficient kidney after ischemia-reperfusion injury.9 Emerging evidence has revealed that unfolded proteins, which could be produced under various stresses including ROS, are common targets of both proteasomal and autophagy-mediated degradation, although how these two systems interact and share respective roles in clearance of the unfolded proteins remains unclear.42,43 Excessive unfolded proteins, which cannot be cleared with two mechanisms, can accumulate and form large aggregates. Formation of protein aggregates is at least in part mediated by ubiquitin-binding protein p62. There-
524 Takahashi et al AJP February 2012, Vol. 180, No. 2
A
9HKLFOH )).$3
))
)).$3
S
0HUJH
)).$3
᧦
1XPEHURIS SRVLWLYHGRWVPP
))
))
&LVSODWLQ
9HKLFOH &LVSODWLQ
9HKLFOH ))
)).$3
))
&LVSODWLQ ))
8ELTXLWLQ
)).$3
1XPEHURIXELTXLWLQ SRVLWLYHGRWVPP
B
0HUJH
)).$3
᧦
9HKLFOH &LVSODWLQ Figure 5. Accumulation of p62-positive and ubiquitin-positive aggregates in the autophagy-deficient kidney proximal tubules at 3 days after cisplatin treatment (15 mg/kg). Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated accumulation of p62-positive (A) and ubiquitin-positive (B) aggregates in proximal tubules of cisplatin-treated Atg5F/F:KAP mice (n ⫽ 4 to 7). Megalin was co-stained in red as a marker of proximal tubules. The number of p62-positive or ubiquitin-positive dots was counted in at least 10 high-power fields (⫻352). Original magnification, ⫻1058. Data are given as mean ⫾ SE. Statistically significant differences (*P ⬍ 0.05) are indicated. F/F, Atg5F/F mice; F/F:KAP, Atg5F/F:KAP mice. Images are representative of multiple experiments.
fore, accumulation of p62-positive and ubiquitin-positive aggregates in autophagy-deficient proximal tubular cells suggests that autophagy could exert a cytoprotective function by degrading otherwise toxic unfolded protein (aggregates) during cisplatin-induced AKI. These proposed mechanisms by which autophagy guards against cisplatin-induced AKI (ie, DNA damage, mitochondrial injury and ROS, and protein aggregates) are depicted schematically in Supplemental Figure S3 (available at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). The renoprotective role of autophagy prompts us to assume that activation of autophagy can be beneficial in preventing AKI. To date, several molecules are proposed as clinically applicable regulators of autophagy.2,44 In contrast, it has been demonstrated that some types of cancer cells use autophagy to survive against lack of nutrients and hypoxia in their microenvironments.45,46 In line with this notion, compounds that can reverse autophagy (eg, chloroquine) have been applied in clinical settings as a sensitizer for conventional chemotherapeutic compounds,45 which may in turn deteriorate cisplatininduced AKI injury. A better understanding of the effect of
autophagy on the relationship between cancer and cisplatin nephrotoxicity would ultimately enable us to harness autophagic pathways as clinically applicable interventions. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that autophagy guards proximal tubular cells against AKI by modulating several deteriorative pathways that lead to tubular cell death.
Acknowledgments We thank Noboru Mizushima (Tokyo Medical and Dental University) for donation of the Atg5F/F and GFP-LC3 transgenic mice and pCI-neo-mApg5, Sumio Sugano (University of Tokyo) for pEF321-T, Shoji Yamaoka (Tokyo Medical and Dental University) for MRX-IRES-bsr, Toshio Kitamura (University of Tokyo) for Plat-E cells, Toshimi Michigami (Osaka Medical Center and Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health) for the antibody to megalin, and Naoko Horimoto and Keiko Shibayama for technical and secretarial assistance.
Autophagy in Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity 525 AJP February 2012, Vol. 180, No. 2
References 1. Mizushima N: Autophagy: process and function. Genes Dev 2007, 21:2861–2873 2. Levine B, Kroemer G: Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell 2008, 132:27– 42 3. Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ: Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature 2008, 451:1069 –1075 4. Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Levine B: Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell 2010, 140:313–326 5. Pfeifer U, Guder WG: Stimulation of cellular autophagy by parathyroid hormone and cyclic adenosine 3=,5=: monophosphate in isolated tubular fragments from the rat’s kidney cortex. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol 1975, 19:51– 67 6. Pfeifer U, Scheller H: A morphometric study of cellular autophagy including diurnal variations in kidney tubules of normal rats. J Cell Biol 1975, 64:608 – 621 7. Suzuki C, Isaka Y, Takabatake Y, Tanaka H, Koike M, Shibata M, Uchiyama Y, Takahara S, Imai E: Participation of autophagy in renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008, 368:100 –106 8. Jiang M, Liu K, Luo J, Dong Z: Autophagy is a renoprotective mechanism during in vitro hypoxia and in vivo ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Pathol 2010, 176:1181–1192 9. Kimura T, Takabatake Y, Takahashi A, Kaimori JY, Matsui I, Namba T, Kitamura H, Niimura F, Matsusaka T, Soga T, Rakugi H, Isaka Y: Autophagy protects the proximal tubule from degeneration and acute ischemic injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011, 22:902–913 10. Periyasamy-Thandavan S, Jiang M, Wei Q, Smith R, Yin XM, Dong Z: Autophagy is cytoprotective during cisplatin injury of renal proximal tubular cells. Kidney Int 2008, 74:631– 640 11. Inoue K, Kuwana H, Shimamura Y, Ogata K, Taniguchi Y, Kagawa T, Horino T, Takao T, Morita T, Sasaki S, Mizushima N, Terada Y: Cisplatin-induced macroautophagy occurs prior to apoptosis in proximal tubules in vivo. Clin Exp Nephrol 2010, 14:112–122 12. Pallet N, Bouvier N, Legendre C, Gilleron J, Codogno P, Beaune P, Thervet E, Anglicheau D: Autophagy protects renal tubular cells against cyclosporine toxicity. Autophagy 2008, 4:783–791 13. Hartleben B, Godel M, Meyer-Schwesinger C, Liu S, Ulrich T, Kobler S, Wiech T, Grahammer F, Arnold SJ, Lindenmeyer MT, Cohen CD, Pavenstadt H, Kerjaschki D, Mizushima N, Shaw AS, Walz G, Huber TB: Autophagy influences glomerular disease susceptibility and maintains podocyte homeostasis in aging mice. J Clin Invest 2010, 120:1084 –1096 14. Shen HM, Codogno P: Autophagic cell death: Loch Ness Monster or endangered species? Autophagy 2011, 5:457– 465 15. Danford AJ, Wang D, Wang Q, Tullius TD, Lippard SJ: Platinum anticancer drug damage enforces a particular rotational setting of DNA in nucleosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:12311–12316 16. Jiang M, Yi X, Hsu S, Wang CY, Dong Z: Role of p53 in cisplatininduced tubular cell apoptosis: dependence on p53 transcriptional activity. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2004, 287:F1140 –F1147 17. Wei Q, Dong G, Yang T, Megyesi J, Price PM, Dong Z: Activation and involvement of p53 in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2007, 293:F1282–F1291 18. Weijl NI, Elsendoorn TJ, Lentjes EG, Hopman GD, Wipkink-Bakker A, Zwinderman AH, Cleton FJ, Osanto S: Supplementation with antioxidant micronutrients and chemotherapy-induced toxicity in cancer patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur J Cancer 2004, 40:1713–1723 19. Mathew R, Kongara S, Beaudoin B, Karp CM, Bray K, Degenhardt K, Chen G, Jin S, White E: Autophagy suppresses tumor progression by limiting chromosomal instability. Genes Dev 2007, 21:1367–1381 20. Karantza-Wadsworth V, Patel S, Kravchuk O, Chen G, Mathew R, Jin S, White E: Autophagy mitigates metabolic stress and genome damage in mammary tumorigenesis. Genes Dev 2007, 21:1621–1635 21. Youle RJ, Narendra DP: Mechanisms of mitophagy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011, 12:9 –14 22. Jin S: Autophagy, mitochondrial quality control, and oncogenesis. Autophagy 2006, 2:80 – 84 23. Tatsuta T, Langer T: Quality control of mitochondria: protection against neurodegeneration and ageing. EMBO J 2008, 27:306 –314
24. Mizushima N, Yamamoto A, Matsui M, Yoshimori T, Ohsumi Y: In vivo analysis of autophagy in response to nutrient starvation using transgenic mice expressing a fluorescent autophagosome marker. Mol Biol Cell 2004, 15:1101–1111 25. Mizushima N, Yamamoto A, Hatano M, Kobayashi Y, Kabeya Y, Suzuki K, Tokuhisa T, Ohsumi Y, Yoshimori T: Dissection of autophagosome formation using Apg5-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells. J Cell Biol 2001, 152:657– 668 26. Fujita N, Hayashi-Nishino M, Fukumoto H, Omori H, Yamamoto A, Noda T, Yoshimori T: An Atg4B mutant hampers the lipidation of LC3 paralogues and causes defects in autophagosome closure. Mol Biol Cell 2008, 19:4651– 4659 27. Morita S, Kojima T, Kitamura T: Plat-E: an efficient and stable system for transient packaging of retroviruses. Gene Ther 2000, 7:1063–1066 28. Matsui I, Hamano T, Mikami S, Fujii N, Takabatake Y, Nagasawa Y, Kawada N, Ito T, Rakugi H, Imai E, Isaka Y: Fully phosphorylated fetuin-A forms a mineral complex in the serum of rats with adenineinduced renal failure. Kidney Int 2009, 75:915–928 29. Pabla N, Dong Z: Cisplatin nephrotoxicity: mechanisms and renoprotective strategies. Kidney Int 2008, 73:994 –1007 30. Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM: DNA doublestranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem 1998, 273:5858 –5868 31. Clingen PH, Wu JY, Miller J, Mistry N, Chin F, Wynne P, Prise KM, Hartley JA: Histone H2AX phosphorylation as a molecular pharmacological marker for DNA interstrand crosslink cancer chemotherapy. Biochem Pharmacol 2008, 76:19 –27 32. Cohen SM, Lippard SJ: Cisplatin: from DNA damage to cancer chemotherapy. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 2001, 67:93–130 33. Siddik ZH: Cisplatin: mode of cytotoxic action and molecular basis of resistance. Oncogene 2003, 22:7265–7279 34. Wang D, Lippard SJ: Cellular processing of platinum anticancer drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2005, 4:307–320 35. Mathew R, Karp CM, Beaudoin B, Vuong N, Chen G, Chen HY, Bray K, Reddy A, Bhanot G, Gelinas C, Dipaola RS, Karantza-Wadsworth V, White E: Autophagy suppresses tumorigenesis through elimination of p62. Cell 2009, 137:1062–1075 36. Gordon JA, Gattone VH 2nd: Mitochondrial alterations in cisplatininduced acute renal failure. Am J Physiol 1986, 250: F991–F998 37. Brady HR, Kone BC, Stromski ME, Zeidel ML, Giebisch G, Gullans SR: Mitochondrial injury: an early event in cisplatin toxicity to renal proximal tubules. Am J Physiol 1990, 258:F1181–F1187 38. Komatsu M, Waguri S, Koike M, Sou YS, Ueno T, Hara T, Mizushima N, Iwata J, Ezaki J, Murata S, Hamazaki J, Nishito Y, Iemura S, Natsume T, Yanagawa T, Uwayama J, Warabi E, Yoshida H, Ishii T, Kobayashi A, Yamamoto M, Yue Z, Uchiyama Y, Kominami E, Tanaka K: Homeostatic levels of p62 control cytoplasmic inclusion body formation in autophagy-deficient mice. Cell 2007, 131:1149 –1163 39. Komatsu M, Waguri S, Chiba T, Murata S, Iwata J, Tanida I, Ueno T, Koike M, Uchiyama Y, Kominami E, Tanaka K: Loss of autophagy in the central nervous system causes neurodegeneration in mice. Nature 2006, 441:880 – 884 40. Hara T, Nakamura K, Matsui M, Yamamoto A, Nakahara Y, SuzukiMigishima R, Yokoyama M, Mishima K, Saito I, Okano H, Mizushima N: Suppression of basal autophagy in neural cells causes neurodegenerative disease in mice. Nature 2006, 441:885– 889 41. Nakai A, Yamaguchi O, Takeda T, Higuchi Y, Hikoso S, Taniike M, Omiya S, Mizote I, Matsumura Y, Asahi M, Nishida K, Hori M, Mizushima N, Otsu K: The role of autophagy in cardiomyocytes in the basal state and in response to hemodynamic stress. Nat Med 2007, 13:619–624 42. Kirkin V, McEwan DG, Novak I, Dikic I: A role for ubiquitin in selective autophagy. Mol Cell 2009, 34:259 –269 43. Kraft C, Peter M, Hofmann K: Selective autophagy: ubiquitin-mediated recognition and beyond. Nat Cell Biol 2010, 12:836 – 841 44. Ravikumar B, Vacher C, Berger Z, Davies JE, Luo S, Oroz LG, Scaravilli F, Easton DF, Duden R, O’Kane CJ, Rubinsztein DC: Inhibition of mTOR induces autophagy and reduces toxicity of polyglutamine expansions in fly and mouse models of Huntington disease. Nat Genet 2004, 36:585–595 45. Dalby KN, Tekedereli I, Lopez-Berestein G, Ozpolat B: Targeting the prodeath and prosurvival functions of autophagy as novel therapeutic strategies in cancer. Autophagy 2010, 6:322–329 46. Rouschop KM, Wouters BG: Regulation of autophagy through multiple independent hypoxic signaling pathways. Curr Mol Med 2009, 9:417–424