Autophagy in the control and pathogenesis of viral infection

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

Autophagy in the control and pathogenesis of viral infection Brian Yordy and Akiko Iwasaki Autophagy is an evolutionary conserved process that plays a central role in eukaryotic cell metabolism. Constitutive autophagy allows cells to ensure their energy needs are met during times of starvation, degrade long-lived cytosolic proteins, and recycle organelles. In addition, autophagy and its machinery can be utilized to degrade intracellular pathogens, and this function likely represents one of the earliest eukaryotic defense mechanisms against viral pathogens. Within the past decade, it has become clear that autophagy has not only retained its evolutionarily ancient ability to degrade intracellular pathogens, but also has coevolved with the vertebrate immune system to augment and fine tune antiviral immune responses. Herein, we aim to summarize these recent findings as well as to highlight key unanswered questions of the field. Address Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA Corresponding author: Iwasaki, Akiko ([email protected])

Current Opinion in Virology 2011, 1:196–203 This review comes from a themed issue on Viral pathogenesis Edited by Frank Chisari and Adolfo Garcia–Sastre Available online 23rd June 2011 1879-6257/$ – see front matter # 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. DOI 10.1016/j.coviro.2011.05.016

Introduction The development of compartmentalized structures ubiquitous to eukaryotic cells provided the earliest eukaryotes with numerous evolutionary advantages. However, the development of these organelles presented several novel challenges. Early eukaryotic cells were likely unable to efficiently remove damaged organelles, precisely control organelle number, or utilize their components as an energy source during times of starvation. Autophagy likely represents an evolutionary solution to these challenges, as it enables the recycling of intracellular components via lysosomal degradation. Autophagy is also rapidly induced during starvation conditions and allows cells to survive periods of nutrient deprivation and stress by catabolizing self components [1]. Moreover, autophagy allows cells to efficiently remove damaged or unneeded intracellular components without relying on cell division or cell death [2]. This ability to maintain long-term cell-autonomous homeostasis [3] likely paved the way for the development Current Opinion in Virology 2011, 1:196–203

of long-lived, terminally differentiated cell types found in metazoans. Indeed, studies with mice with genetic deletion in AuTophaGy (ATG) genes have revealed that long-lived cell types such as neurons [4,5] and cardiomyocytes [6] are incapable of maintaining homeostasis in the absence of autophagy. It is easy to envision how our early eukaryotic ancestors might have co-opted autophagy to combat another significant challenge — removal of intracellular pathogens [7]. In vertebrates, type I interferons provide a key mechanism of antiviral defense by inducing genes that have direct antiviral activities [8–10]. Prior to the evolution of the interferon system, however, the eukaryotic host had a limited repertoire of defenses to employ against intracellular pathogens. Autophagy provides eukaryotic cells with a potential means to efficiently remove invading pathogens [11]. Indeed, the autophagy and the ATG proteins have been implicated as playing a key role in the targeting and degradation of numerous bacterial [12,13], viral [15], and parasitic [14] pathogens. This process, termed xenophagy [16], has been shown to play a critical role in pathogen degradation in multiple model organisms including, C. elegans [17], Drosophila [18], and Mus musculus [16]. Thus, autophagy is an ancient, evolutionary conserved form of defense against intracellular pathogens. Within the past 10 years, several distinct forms of autophagy have been delineated, including macroautophagy, chaperone-mediated autophagy, and microautophagy [19]. Macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy) involves the formation of a double membrane vesicle around intracellular components [20]. The completed vesicle is referred to as an autophagosome, and is subsequently degraded via autophagosome–lysosome fusion. The entire process of autophagosome formation is dependent on the precise coordination of an evolutionary conserved set of Atg genes [20]. However, the molecular mechanism of autophagy is beyond the scope of this review, and has been expertly reviewed elsewhere [21,22]. Here, we focus on the mechanisms by which autophagy and/or Atg gene products are utilized by the mammalian immune system to coordinate antiviral defense.

Direct role of autophagy in antiviral defense The first evidence for the role of autophagy in antiviral defense came from Sindbis viral infection. Overexpression of the ATG protein beclin-1 (mammalian orthologue of yeast Atg6) resulted in decreased viral replication and increased survival following intracranial injection www.sciencedirect.com

Autophagy in viral infection and immunity Yordy and Iwasaki 197

of Sindbis virus [23]. Moreover, neuron-specific deletion of the host proteins ATG5 and ATG7 was shown to decrease survival following intracranial injection with Sindbis virus, providing further evidence that autophagy is required in antiviral defense in vivo [24]. Interestingly, viral replication was comparable in the absence of host ATG proteins, but viral proteins were incapable of being cleared in the absence of autophagy. Thus, autophagy, but not necessarily xenophagy of intact virions, is required within neurons to target and remove toxic levels of Sindbis viral proteins.

Autophagy as a ‘fine-tuner’ of the antiviral immune response

Further evidence for the role of autophagy in directly controlling viral pathogenesis has come from studies involving members of the herpes family of viruses. Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) encodes a virulence factor, ICP34.5, which inhibits a variety of host antiviral mechanisms. ICP34.5 abrogates protein kinase R ( pkr)dependent translational shutdown [25]. In addition, ICP34.5 blocks autophagy through two distinct pathways; abrogation of PKR-dependent autophagy induction [26]; and through binding and inhibiting beclin-1 [27]. Removal of the beclin-1 binding domain of ICP34.5 resulted in a mutant strain incapable of inhibiting host autophagy initiated by HSV-1 infection. Infection of both fibroblasts and parasympathetic neurons with this HSV-1 mutant resulted in autophagic engulfment of HSV-1 viral particles [28]. Thus, autophagy controls HSV-1 replication at least in part via degradation of HSV-1 virions and/ or viral proteins [29].

Autophagy plays a critical role in regulating and enhancing multiple aspects of adaptive antiviral immunity, including antigen processing and presentation. Seminal studies by Paludan et al. revealed that autophagy plays a critical role in presenting cytosolic viral antigens on MHC II [35]. A plethora of subsequent studies have demonstrated autophagy is critical in mediating presentation of cytosolic viral [36] and host [37] antigens on MHC II, and may also be important in presenting viral antigens on MHC I [38]. Additionally, intraocular infection with an HSV-1 mutant incapable of inhibiting host autophagy resulted in increased CD4+ T-cell activation in vivo and decreased mortality [40], indicating that autophagy within a productively infected cell type is important in activating CD4+ T-cells, presumably via enhanced MHC II antigen presentation.

Importantly, autophagy is also critical in anti-HSV-1 defense in vivo (Figure 1) [27]. Intracranial infection with the HSV-1 beclin-1 binding deficient mutant resulted in reduced mortality and decreased HSV-1 replication [27]. The precise mechanism by which autophagy limits HSV-1 replication in these neurons is likely at least partially explained by the aforementioned degradation of HSV-1 viral particles in autophagosomes. Interestingly, no phenotype was observed in in vitro infections of cell lines or primary mouse embyroninc fibroblasts (MEFs) [27,30]. Future studies are needed to understand the basis for the cell-type specific requirement for autophagy in antiviral defense. Of note, Sindbis virus and HSV-1 are both neurotropic viruses that replicate within neurons. Neurons are widely regarded as an immune privileged cell-type, and limited cytolytic responses are observed against neurons. Intriguingly, autophagy was shown to play a role in limiting VSV replication and decreasing mortality in Drosophila, but not in MEFs in vitro [31]. Drosophila is not a natural host of VSV and is devoid of both an adaptive immune system and type I IFNs [32]. Thus, autophagy may represent an ancient form of antiviral defense that plays a critical role in antiviral defense in systems in which other antiviral mechanisms are absent. www.sciencedirect.com

The autophagy machinery is remarkably conserved from yeast to human. Both autophagy and the vertebrate immune system play essential roles in maintaining cellular and host homeostasis in the face of external perturbations [33]. Such proximal functions imply significant crosstalk between these systems. Indeed, numerous studies in the past decade have revealed that an intimate, reciprocal relationship has evolved between autophagy and the vertebrate immune system [34].

In addition to the role of autophagy in the presentation of cytosolic antigens, a recent in vivo study showed the importance of autophagic machinery in mediating presentation of extracellular antigens by dendritic cells [39]. It is known that extracellular antigens are taken up by phagocytosis and processed in acidic MHC class II compartment (MIIC) for presentation to CD4+ T cells. This study demonstrated that autophagic machinery may play an important role in this process. Atg proteins are recruited to the phagosomal membrane containing microbial antigens and facilitate fusion with MIIC, thereby enhancing processing of antigens for presentation to MHC class II in dendritic cells. As a result, ATG5 deficient CD11c+ dendritic cells failed to efficiently prime CD4+ T-cells, resulting in increased mortality following intravaginal herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) infection. DCs that lack Atg5 had an impaired ability to degrade extracellular antigens containing viral PAMPs, leading to reduced levels of MHC II+ peptide complex presented on their cell surface. However, phagosomes containing PAMPs were not surrounded by double membrane structure, and induction of canonical autophagy pathway using rapamycin did not enhance MHC II peptide presentation, indicating that Atg5 facilitates phagosome-to-lysosome fusion by directly recruiting autophagic machinery to the phagosomal membrane. Current Opinion in Virology 2011, 1:196–203

198 Viral pathogenesis

Figure 1

Non-hematopoietic compartment

Hematopoietic compartment B-cells / splenoctyes

γHV68

Nervous System autophagosome Reduction of viral load (HSV-1) Clearance of toxic viral proteins (Sindbis)

Reduction of chronic infected cell number (γHV68)

HSV-specific CD4+ T-cells

IFN-γ TCR

Epithelial layer

MHC II

Enhanced activation of CD4+ T-cells (HSV-1)

HSV infected cells lls

Enhanced MHC II antigen presentation in DCs (HSV-2)

HSV-1 Current Opinion in Virology

Known roles of the autophagic machinery in vertebrate antiviral defense in vivo. The autophagy machinery has been shown to impact numerous components of antiviral defense in vivo. Gamma herpes virus 68 (gHV68) encodes a protein, vbcl2, which inhibits host autophagy. Removal of this domain of vbcl2 results in a mutant virus that has a reduced ability to maintain chronic infection in splenocytes. Autophagy has also been shown to be critical in enhancing presentation of viral antigens in herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection. Conditional knockout of ATG5 in DCs results in reduced antigen presentation by DCs, decreased CD4+ T-cell activation, and increased mortality following intravaginal HSV-2 infection. Autophagy also provides important antiviral defense mechanisms in non-hematopoietic cells. Removal of the beclin-1 binding domain of the HSV-1 protein ICP34.5 results in increased CD4+ T-cell activation following intraocular HSV-1 infection, presumably by enhancing autophagy-dependent antigen presentation. Autophagy has also been shown to be critical in antiviral defense in neurons. Intracranial infection with the ICP34.5 HSV-1 mutant described above results in increased viral replication and increased mortality. Moreover, genetic deletion of host ATG proteins results in decreased clearance of viral proteins and increased mortality following intracranial infection with Sindbis virus.

Autophagy and ATG proteins also play a critical role in innate recognition of viruses and the downstream cytokine responses during viral infection (Figure 2). Viruses are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) of innate immune system through the detection of viral nucleic acid [41]. Cytosolic nucleic acid is detected by RIG-I like receptors (RLRs), while viral nucleic acid within endosomal compartments is recognized by Toll like receptors (TLRs) [42]. Both detection systems activate IRF3/IRF7 and NF-kB transcription factors, resulting in the production of type I IFNs and proinflammatory cytokines, respectively [41,42]. The relationship between autophagy and innate recognition of viruses was first elucidated in a specialized subset of dendritic cells known Current Opinion in Virology 2011, 1:196–203

as plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) [43]. Both pharmacological inhibition and ATG5 genetic deficiency resulted in impaired recognition of vesicular stromatis virus (VSV) and Sendai virus through TLR-7 [43,44]. Thus, autophagy is required to facilitate host recognition of viral infection via delivery of viral ligand to the appropriate TLR-containing compartment. In addition, TLR9dependent production of type I IFN, but not proinflammatory cytokines, requires Atg5, indicating that a pathway involving ATG proteins is required for IRF7-dependent signals downstream of TLR9 [43]. In contrast, autophagy has also been shown to attenuate RLR-dependent production of both type I IFN and www.sciencedirect.com

Autophagy in viral infection and immunity Yordy and Iwasaki 199

Figure 2

Viral entry / uncoating RIG-I MDA5 MAVS

ATG5-ATG12

Viral replication

TLR7 TLR9

TRAF3

Mitophagy

NAP1 TANK STING MAVS

IRF-7

TBK1

Myd88 TRAF6

ATG9a

IRAK4 STING

IRF-3 IRF-7

ATG5

IRAK1

NF-kB

Type I IFNs

Type l lFNs

Current Opinion in Virology

Role of autophagy machinery in innate antiviral signaling. Autophagy and ATG proteins play essential roles in enhancing and precisely regulating antiviral cytokine responses. Autophagy and ATG proteins negatively regulate antiviral cytokine production in non-hematopoietic cells. The ATG5– ATG12 conjugate inhibits production of type I IFNs and proinflammatory cytokines by binding to and inhibiting the RIG-I like receptor (RLR) adaptor MAVS. Autophagy also negatively regulates RLR signaling by reducing cellular MAVS and cellular ROS levels by mitophagy. Atg9a negatively regulates the production of antiviral cytokines in response to immunostimulatory DNA by blocking the translocation of STING to TBK1 signaling complexes. In plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), autophagy is required for the delivery of viral PAMP to the TLR-7 signaling compartment. Additionally, ATG5 is required for TLR-9 dependent type I interferon production, but not NF-kB signaling, in pDCs.

proinflammatory cytokines in response to several viral stimuli in non-hematopoietic cells. The ATG5–ATG12 conjugate binds to MAVS, an adaptor protein downstream of RLR, and abrogates MAVS-dependent type I IFN production independent of canonical autophagy [45]. In addition, in the absence of autophagy, there is an accumulation of both cellular MAVS and damaged mitochondria [46]. This results in elevated levels of both mitochondrial associated reaction oxygen species (ROS) and MAVS, which synergize to amplify RLR signaling. In both studies, ATG5 dependent downregulation of RLR signaling led to an enhanced VSV replication. Furthermore, it has recently been shown that ATG9a negatively regulates proinflammatory cytokine and type I IFN production. ATG9a interacts with STING, a transmembrane protein involved in the immunostimulatory DNA pathway, and prevents translocation to TBK1 signaling complexes [47]. Autophagy can also indirectly regulate proinflammatory cytokine production, as accumulation of the selective autophagy substrate p62 can oligomerize TRAF6, thus activating downstream NF-kB signaling [48]. www.sciencedirect.com

Such findings could be extrapolated to argue that the autophagy machinery is ‘proviral’, as autophagy-dependent reduction in antiviral cytokines results in increased replication of certain viruses in vitro. However, immunecompetent vertebrate hosts are able to sufficiently clear VSV infection [49]. Thus, the additional production of proinflammatory cytokines produced in the absence of autophagy is not required in anti-VSV defense. On the contrary, robust cytokine production in the absence of autophagy potentially contributes to a prolonged proinflammatory state that is detrimental to the host [50]. In support of this paradigm, several recent studies have demonstrated a link between autophagy deficiency, increased proinflammatory cytokine production, and the development of Crohn’s disease. Both humans and mice with a mutation in ATG16L have an increased susceptibility to develop Crohn’s disease [51]. Although multiple defects of the ATG16L mutant host likely contribute to this phenotype, ATG16L deficient cells have increased production of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1b and IL-17 [52,53]. Recently, Cadwell et al. Current Opinion in Virology 2011, 1:196–203

200 Viral pathogenesis

demonstrated that exposure to a specific viral pathogen in ATG16L hypomorphic mice led to increased proinflammatory cytokine production and the development of colitis upon physical injury caused by DSS [54]. Thus, in the absence of autophagy, increased cytokine production during viral infection contributes to the development of pathological inflammation.

viruses circumvent autophagy-dependent degradation and possibly interfere with innate recognition and presentation of viral antigens on MHC molecules. Teleologically, this suggests that a key function of autophagy in antiviral defense against these pathogens is not only viral degradation but also delivering viral components to innate and/or adaptive processing compartments.

Viral modulation of host autophagy

In contrast, several classes of viruses have been reported to require autophagy to achieve maximal viral replication in vitro. Coxsackieviruses (CVB) 3 [69], CVB 4 [70], foot and mouth disease virus [71], and poliovirus [72,73] all induce autophagy upon infection, and siRNA knockdown of host ATG proteins decreases viral yields. Moreover, autophagy is also triggered by ER stress following hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection [74]. Pharmacological inhibition or siRNA knockdown of ATG genes results in both decreased translation and replication of HCV RNA [75]. Other studies suggest that the requirement for autophagy in HCV replication may be in part due to negative regulatory role of autophagy on RLR recognition pathway [45,46], as depletion of Atg expression result in increased antiviral cytokine production after HCV infection [76,77]. Autophagy has also been shown to indirectly aid viral replication in vitro by affecting cell metabolism. siRNA knockdown of Atg genes or pharmacological inhibition of autophagy resulted in decreased Dengue viral replication in vitro [78] and viral RNA may [79] colocalize with autophagic vesicles. Interestingly, siRNA knockdown of Atg genes decreased fatty acid metabolism during Dengue virus infection, and supplementation with fatty acids restored Dengue virus replication to WT levels [80]. These data suggest Dengue virus utilizes autophagy in infected cells to meet the energy needs required for maximal virus replication. Hence, viruses have evolved numerous strategies to subvert the host ATG machinery to directly or indirectly aid multiple aspects of viral replication.

The importance of the type I IFN program in antiviral defense is underscored by the observation that numerous viral pathogens have developed countermeasures to antagonize this response [55]. Similarly, it is now clear that many viruses employ strategies to counter and/or subvert host autophagy [56]. These strategies can be broadly classified into three nonmutually exclusive approaches: (1) direct inhibition of host ATG proteins responsible for autophagy induction; (2) downstream interference of autophagy degradation pathway; (3) subverting host autophagy to aid in viral replication. As discussed above, HSV-1 virulence factor ICP34.5 inhibits autophagy via inhibition of beclin 1 and PKR [27]. Intriguingly, additional members of the herpes family of viruses employ similar strategies to inhibit autophagy. Gamma herpes virus 68 (gHV68) encodes a virulence factor, vbcl2 (M11), which inhibits host autophagy via interaction with beclin 1 [57]. Removal of the vbcl2 binding domain results in a significant reduction in the number of chronically gHV68 infected splenocytes in vivo [58]. Further, Kaposi’s sarcoma herpes virus (KSHV) utilizes vFLIP to interact with ATG3 and inhibit autophagy [59]. Additionally, human cytomegalovirus was recently shown to inhibit autophagy via upstream activation of mTOR signaling [60]. Of note, HSV also encodes a molecule, Us3, which acts as a viral Akt surrogate to activate mTORC1 [61], potentially inhibiting host autophagy upstream of induction as well. Thus, multiple members of the herpesviridae family of viruses employ both evolutionary convergent and divergent strategies to inhibit host autophagy.In contrast to viruses that have developed mechanisms to inhibit de novo autophagosome formation, influenza and HIV-1 antagonize process downstream of autophagy induction. Although genetic deletion of Atg5 resulted in no significant change in influenza replication in MEFs, influenza-infected WT cells rapidly accumulated autophagosomes [62]. Further analysis revealed that the M2 protein of influenza prevents autophagosome–lysosome fusion. HIV-1 appears to employ an analogous strategy as, HIV-1 nef also blocks autophagosome–lysosome fusion in macrophages [63]. However, the relationship between HIV-1 and autophagy is complex, and seems to be dependent on the infected cell type and viral load [64–68] (see [67,68] for detailed review). The viral evasion strategy employed by influenza and HIV-1 allows sequestration of virions and viral proteins within autophagosomses. By preventing autophagosome maturation, these Current Opinion in Virology 2011, 1:196–203

The mechanism(s) by which these viruses subvert the host ATG machinery is an intriguing question that requires further investigation. In several of these host– virus interactions, recent studies have insinuated a sophisticated relationship in which the virus hi-jacks certain components of the ATG machinery to aid in viral replication, while simultaneously inhibiting functional autophagy. Accordingly, the poliovirus protein 3A inhibits autophagosome movement along the microtubule network [81], potentially antagonizing autophagosome-tolysosome fusion. CBV 3 has also been shown to functionally block autophagosome maturation [82]. Moreover, autophagy appears to be induced with minimal antiviral effects in certain herpesviridae experimental systems [83,84]. Thus, the current distinction between viruses that inhibit autophagy and those that require the autophagy machinery for maximal viral replication might yet prove to be not so black and white. www.sciencedirect.com

Autophagy in viral infection and immunity Yordy and Iwasaki 201

Importantly, several studies have shown that genetic deletion of host ATG proteins results in both increased morbidity and mortality following viral infection in vivo (Figure 1). Interestingly, no current studies have demonstrated the converse — the absence of autophagy resulting in reduced viral replication, morbidity, or mortality in vivo. This may simply be due to the model systems employed by investigators, and future studies might yet reveal in vivo models (e.g. HCV) in which the absence of autophagy is beneficial to the mammalian host during virus infection. However, we suspect that this scenario is unlikely. Although autophagy inhibition in vivo may reduce local replication of certain viruses, such a reduction comes at a high cost — failure to robustly activate and precisely regulate innate and adaptive immunity.

References and recommended reading Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:  of special interest  of outstanding interest 1.

Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ: Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature 2008, 451:1069-1075.

2.

Rabinowitz JD, White E: Autophagy and metabolism. Science 2010, 330:1344-1348.

3.

Levine B, Kroemer G: Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell 2008, 132:27-42.

4.

Hara T, Nakamura K, Matsui M, Yamamoto A, Nakahara Y, SuzukiMigishima R, Yokoyama M, Mishima K, Saito I, Okano H et al.: Suppression of basal autophagy in neural cells causes neurodegenerative disease in mice. Nature 2006, 441:885-889.

5.

Komatsu M, Waguri S, Chiba T, Murata S, Iwata J, Tanida I, Ueno T, Koike M, Uchiyama Y, Kominami E et al.: Loss of autophagy in the central nervous system causes neurodegeneration in mice. Nature 2006, 441:880-884.

6.

Nakai A, Yamaguchi O, Takeda T, Higuchi Y, Hikoso S, Taniike M, Omiya S, Mizote I, Matsumura Y, Asahi M et al.: The role of autophagy in cardiomyocytes in the basal state and in response to hemodynamic stress. Nat Med 2007, 13:619-624.

7.

Levine B, Deretic V: Unveiling the roles of autophagy in innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2007, 7:767-777.

8.

Samuel CE: Antiviral actions of interferons. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001, 14:778-809.

9.

Sen GC: Viruses and interferons. Annu Rev Microbiol 2001, 55:255-281.

Conclusion Autophagy has not only retained an evolutionary ancient ability to eliminate intracellular pathogens but also has coevolved with the immune system to fine-tune, enhance, and regulate numerous antiviral immunological responses. Although our understanding of autophagy in antiviral immunity has increased exponentially within the past decade, many questions remain. Foremost of these is understanding the complex relationship that exists between the numerous immunological processes autophagy has been implicated in and the various components of the ATG machinery. In many of the previously discussed studies, it is unclear whether or not autophagy, or distinct components/proteins of the autophagic machinery, are the key mediators of the observed phenotype [85]. This ambiguity is not trivial, as development of successful autophagy antiviral therapeutics requires understanding of the appropriate molecular pathways to target. Along these lines, the development of pharmacological agents that specifically induce autophagy is a key future goal [86]. Although numerous autophagy-inducing pharmacological agents are widely employed, the vast majority of these induce autophagy through modulation of upstream signaling nodes, all of which have pleiotropic effects in vitro and in vivo [86,87]. The development of specific inducers of autophagy will not only serve as a powerful tool for investigators to dissect the roles of the autophagy versus the Atg proteins but also offer promise as a novel class of antiviral therapeutics.

Conflict of interest Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) (AI054359, AI062428, AI064705, and AI083242 to A.I.). A.I. holds an Investigators in Pathogenesis of Infectious Disease Award from the Burroughs Welcome Fund. B.Y. was in part supported by the Predoctoral Virology Training grant number T32 AI055403 from the NIH. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. www.sciencedirect.com

10. Stetson DB, Medzhitov R: Type I interferons in host defense. Immunity 2006, 25:373-381. 11. Deretic V, Levine B: Autophagy, immunity, and microbial adaptations. Cell Host Microbe 2009, 5:527-549. 12. Gutierrez MG, Master SS, Singh SB, Taylor GA, Colombo MI, Deretic V: Autophagy is a defense mechanism inhibiting BCG and Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival in infected macrophages. Cell 2004, 119:753-766. 13. Singh SB, Davis AS, Taylor GA, Deretic V: Human IRGM induces autophagy to eliminate intracellular mycobacteria. Science 2006, 313:1438-1441. 14. Zhao Z, Fux B, Goodwin M, Dunay IR, Strong D, Miller BC, Cadwell K, Delgado MA, Ponpuak M, Green KG et al.: Autophagosome-independent essential function for the autophagy protein Atg5 in cellular immunity to intracellular pathogens. Cell Host Microbe 2008, 4:458-469. 15. Sumpter R, Levine B: Autophagy and innate immunity: triggering, targeting and tuning. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2010, 21:699-711. 16. Levine B: Eating oneself and uninvited guests: autophagyrelated pathways in cellular defense. Cell 2005, 120:159-162. 17. Jia K, Thomas C, Akbar M, Sun Q, Adams-Huet B, Gilpin C, Levine B: Autophagy genes protect against Salmonella typhimurium infection and mediate insulin signalingregulated pathogen resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:14564-14569. 18. Yano T, Mita S, Ohmori H, Oshima Y, Fujimoto Y, Ueda R, Takada H, Goldman WE, Fukase K, Silverman N et al.: Autophagic control of Listeria through intracellular innate immune recognition in Drosophila. Nat Immunol 2008, 9:908-916. 19. Majeski AE, Fred Dice J: Mechanisms of chaperone-mediated autophagy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2004, 36:2435-2444. 20. Mizushima N, Ohsumi Y, Yoshimori T: Autophagosome formation in mammalian cells. Cell Struct Funct 2002, 27:421-429. Current Opinion in Virology 2011, 1:196–203

202 Viral pathogenesis

21. Levine B, Klionsky DJ: Development by self-digestion: molecular mechanisms and biological functions of autophagy. Dev Cell 2004, 6:463-477. 22. Nakatogawa H, Suzuki K, Kamada Y, Ohsumi Y: Dynamics and diversity in autophagy mechanisms: lessons from yeast. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10:458-467. 23. Liang XH, Kleeman LK, Jiang HH, Gordon G, Goldman JE, Berry G, Herman B, Levine B: Protection against fatal Sindbis virus encephalitis by Beclin, a novel Bcl-2-interacting protein. J Virol 1998, 72:8586-8596. 24. Orvedahl A, MacPherson S, Sumpter R Jr, Tallo´czy Z, Zou Z,  Levine B: Autophagy protects against Sindbis virus infection of the central nervous system. Cell Host Microbe 2010, 7:115-127. This paper defined the mechanism by which autophagy is important in Sindbis antiviral defense in vivo, as well as provided the first evidence that viral proteins are specifically targeted to autophagosomes. 25. He B, Gross M, Roizman B: The g134.5 protein of herpes simplex virus 1 complexes with protein phosphatase 1a to dephosphorylate the a subunit of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 and preclude the shutoff of protein synthesis by double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997, 94:843-848. 26. Tallo´czy Z, Jiang W, Virgin IV, Leib HW, Scheuner DA, Kaufman D, Eskelinen E-RJ, Levine B: Regulation of starvation- and virusinduced autophagy by the elF2a kinase signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:190-195. 27. Orvedahl A, Alexander D, Tallo´czy Z, Sun Q, Wei Y, Zhang W,  Burns D, Leib DA, Levine B: HSV-1 ICP34.5 confers neurovirulence by targeting the beclin 1 autophagy protein. Cell Host Microbe 2007, 1:23-35. This study provided the first evidence that viral pathogens encode virulence factors that inhibit autophagy and that this inhibition antagonizes host antiviral defense in vivo. 28. Tallo´czy Z, Virgin IV, Levine HWB: PKR-dependent autophagic degradation of herpes simplex virus type 1. Autophagy 2006, 2:24-29. 29. Alexander DE, Leib DA: Xenophagy in herpes simplex virus replication and pathogenesis. Autophagy 2008, 4:101-103. 30. Alexander DE, Ward SL, Mizushima N, Levine B, Leib DA: Analysis of the role of autophagy in replication of herpes simplex virus in cell culture. J Virol 2007, 81:12128-12134. 31. Shelly S, Lukinova N, Bambina S, Berman A, Cherry S: Autophagy is an essential component of Drosophila immunity against vesicular stomatitis virus. Immunity 2009, 30:588-598. 32. Leclerc V, Reichhart J: The immune response of Drosophila melanogaster. Immunol Rev 2004, 198:59-71. 33. Kelekar A: Autophagy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005, 1066:259-271. 34. Levine B, Mizushima N, Virgin HW: Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature 2011, 469:323-335. 35. Paludan C, Schmid D, Landthaler M, Vockerodt M, Kube D, Tuschl T, Mu¨nz C: Endogenous MHC class II processing of a viral nuclear antigen after autophagy. Science 2005, 307:593-596. 36. Schmid D, Pypaert M, Mu¨nz C: Antigen-loading compartments for major histocompatibility complex class II molecules continuously receive input from autophagosomes. Immunity 2007, 26:79-92. 37. Nedjic J, Aichinger M, Emmerich J, Mizushima N, Klein L: Autophagy in thymic epithelium shapes the T-cell repertoire and is essential for tolerance. Nature 2008, 455:396-400. 38. English L, Chemali M, Duron J, Rondeau C, Laplante A, Gingras D, Alexander D, Leib D, Norbury C, Lippe´ R et al.: Autophagy enhances the presentation of endogenous viral antigens on MHC class I molecules during HSV-1 infection. Nat Immunol 2009, 10:480-487. 39. Lee HK, Mattei LM, Steinberg BE, Alberts P, Lee YH,  Chervonsky A, Mizushima N, Grinstein S, Iwasaki A: In vivo requirement for Atg5 in antigen presentation by dendritic cells. Immunity 2010, 32:227-239. Current Opinion in Virology 2011, 1:196–203

This study that demonstrated that host ATG machinery is critical in antigen presentation of viral pathogens in vivo. 40. Leib DA, Alexander DE, Cox D, Yin J, Ferguson TA: Interaction of ICP34.5 with beclin 1 modulates herpes simplex virus type 1 pathogenesis through control of CD4+ T-cell responses. J Virol 2009, 83:12164-12171. 41. Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O: Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 2006, 124:783-801. 42. Medzhitov R: Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response. Nature 2007, 449:819-826. 43. Lee HK, Lund JM, Ramanathan B, Mizushima N, Iwasaki A: Autophagy-dependent viral recognition by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Science 2007, 315:1398-1401. 44. Manuse MJ, Briggs CM, Parks GD: Replication-independent activation of human plasmacytoid dendritic cells by the paramyxovirus SV5 requires TLR7 and autophagy pathways. Virology 2010, 405:383-389. 45. Jounai N, Takeshita F, Kobiyama K, Sawano A, Miyawaki A, Xin K, Ishii KJ, Kawai T, Akira S, Suzuki K et al.: The Atg5–Atg12 conjugate associates with innate antiviral immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:14050-14055. 46. Tal MC: Absence of autophagy results in reactive oxygen species dependent amplification of RLR signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:2770-2775. 47. Saitoh T, Fujita N, Hayashi T, Takahara K, Satoh T, Lee H,  Matsunaga K, Kageyama S, Omori H, Noda T et al.: Atg9a controls dsDNA-driven dynamic translocation of STING and the innate immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:20842-20846. This report demonstrates the ATG machinery negatively regulates innate antiviral signaling by regulating the localization of innate signaling components. 48. Sanz L, Diaz-Meco MT, Nakano H, Moscat J: The atypical PKCinteracting protein p62 channels NF-kB activation by the IL-1– TRAF6 pathway. EMBO J 2000, 19:1576-1586. 49. Iannacone M, Moseman EA, Tonti E, Bosurgi L, Junt T, Henrickson SE, Whelan SP, Guidotti LG, Von Andrian UH: Subcapsular sinus macrophages prevent CNS invasion on peripheral infection with a neurotropic virus. Nature 2010, 465:1079-1083. 50. Saitoh T, Akira S: Regulation of innate immune responses by autophagy-related proteins. J Cell Biol 2010, 189: 925-935. 51. Barrett JC, Hansoul S, Nicolae DL, Cho JH, Duerr RH, Rioux JD, Brant SR, Silverberg MS, Taylor KD, Barmada MM et al.: Genome-wide association defines more than 30 distinct susceptibility loci for Crohn’s disease. Nat Genet 2008, 40:955-962. 52. Cadwell K, Liu JY, Brown SL, Miyoshi H, Loh J, Lennerz JK, Kishi C, Kc W, Carrero JA, Hunt S et al.: A key role for autophagy and the autophagy gene Atg16l1 in mouse and human intestinal Paneth cells. Nature 2008, 456:259-263. 53. Saitoh T, Fujita N, Jang MH, Uematsu S, Yang B, Satoh T, Omori H,  Noda T, Yamamoto N, Komatsu M et al.: Loss of the autophagy protein Atg16L1 enhances endotoxin-induced IL-1b production. Nature 2008, 456:264-268. This study (along with [52]) provided the first evidence that genetic deficiency of Atg16L can lead to increased cytokine production in vitro and contribute to pathological inflammation in vivo. 54. Cadwell K, Patel KK, Maloney NS, Liu T, Ng ACY, Storer CE,  Head RD, Xavier R, Stappenbeck TS, Virgin HW: Virus-plussusceptibility gene interaction determines Crohn’s disease gene Atg16L1 phenotypes in intestine. Cell 2010, 141:1135-1145. This study revealed that an interaction between a specific virus infection and a mutation in the host gene Atg16L1 induces intestinal pathology in vivo. 55. Garcı´a-Sastre A, Biron CA: Type 1 interferons and the virus–host relationship: a lesson in de´tente. Science 2006, 312:879-882. www.sciencedirect.com

Autophagy in viral infection and immunity Yordy and Iwasaki 203

56. Orvedahl A, Levine B: Autophagy in mammalian antiviral immunity. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2009, 335:267-285. 57. Ku B, Woo J, Liang C, Lee K, Hong H-EX, Kim K, Jung JU, Oh B: Structural and biochemical bases for the inhibition of autophagy and apoptosis by viral BCL-2 of murine g-herpes virus 68. PLoS Pathog 2008:4.

71. O’Donnell V, Pacheco JM, LaRocco M, Burrage T, Jackson W, Rodriguez LL, Borca MV, Baxt B: Foot-and-mouth disease virus utilizes an autophagic pathway during viral replication. Virology 2011, 410:142-150. 72. Taylor MP, Kirkegaard K: Modification of cellular autophagy protein LC3 by poliovirus. J Virol 2007, 81:12543-12553.

58. Hwang EX, Oh S, Lee J-S, Jeong JH, Gwack Y, Kowalik TF, Sun R, Jung JU, Liang C: Viral Bcl-2-mediated evasion of autophagy aids chronic infection of gherpes virus 68. PLoS Pathog 2009:5.

73. Suhy DA, Giddings TH, Kirkegaard JK: Remodeling the endoplasmic reticulum by poliovirus infection and by individual viral proteins: an autophagy-like origin for virusinduced vesicles. J Virol 2000, 74:8953-8965.

59. Lee J, Li Q, Lee J, Lee S, Jeong JH, Lee H, Chang H, Zhou F, Gao S, Liang C et al.: FLIP-mediated autophagy regulation in cell death control. Nat Cell Biol 2009, 11:1355-1362.

74. Sir D, Chen W, Choi J, Wakita T, Yen TSB, Ou J-J: Induction of incomplete autophagic response by hepatitis C virus via the unfolded protein response. Hepatology 2008, 48:1054-1061.

60. Chaumorcel M, Souque`re S, Pierron G, Codogno P, Esclatine A: Human cytomegalovirus controls a new autophagydependent cellular antiviral defense mechanism. Autophagy 2008, 4:46-53.

75. Dreux M, Gastaminza P, Wieland SF, Chisari FV: The autophagy machinery is required to initiate hepatitis C virus replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:14046-14051.

61. Chuluunbaatar U, Roller R, Feldman ME, Brown S, Shokat KM, Mohr I: Constitutive mTORC1 activation by a herpes virus Akt surrogate stimulates mRNA translation and viral replication. Genes Dev 2010, 24:2627-2639. 62. Gannage´ M, Dormann D, Albrecht R, Dengjel J, Torossi T,  Ra¨mer PC, Lee M, Strowig T, Arrey F, Conenello G et al.: Matrix protein 2 of influenza A virus blocks autophagosome fusion with lysosomes. Cell Host Microbe 2009, 6:367-380. This paper demonstrated influenza M2 protein inhibits autophagosome maturation by preventing lysosome fusion. 63. Kyei GB, Dinkins C, Davis AS, Roberts E, Singh SB, Dong C, Wu L, Kominami E, Ueno T, Yamamoto A et al.: Autophagy pathway intersects with HIV-1 biosynthesis and regulates viral yields in macrophages. J Cell Biol 2009, 186:255-268. 64. Denizot M, Varbanov M, Espert L, Robert-Hebmann V, Sagnier S, Garcia E, Curriu M, Mamoun R, Blanco J, Biard-Piechaczyk M: HIV-1 gp41 fusogenic function triggers autophagy in uninfected cells. Autophagy 2008, 4:998-1008. 65. Espert L, Denizot M, Grimaldi M, Robert-Hebmann V, Gay B, Varbanov M, Codogno P, Biard-Piechaczyk M: Autophagy is involved in T cell death after binding of HIV-1 envelope proteins to CXCR4. J Clin Invest 2006, 116:2161-2172. 66. Zhou D, Spector SA: Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 infection inhibits autophagy. AIDS 2008, 22:695-699. 67. Dinkins C, Arko-Mensah J, Deretic V: Autophagy and HIV. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2010, 21:712-718. 68. Espert L, Biard-Piechaczyk M: Autophagy in HIV-induced T cell death. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2009, 335:307-321. 69. Wong J, Zhang J, Si X, Gao G, Mao I, McManus BM, Luo H: Autophagosome supports coxsackievirus B3 replication in host cells. J Virol 2008, 82:9143-9153. 70. Seung YY, Young EH, Jung EC, Ahn J, Lee H, Kweon H, Lee J, Dong HK: Coxsackievirus B4 uses autophagy for replication after calpain activation in rat primary neurons. J Virol 2008, 82:11976-11978.

www.sciencedirect.com

76. Ke P, Chen SS: Activation of the unfolded protein response and autophagy after hepatitis C virus infection suppresses innate antiviral immunity in vitro. J Clin Invest 2011, 121:37-56. 77. Shrivastava S, Raychoudhuri A, Steele R, Ray R, Ray RB: Knockdown of autophagy enhances the innate immune response in hepatitis C virus-infected hepatocytes. Hepatology 2011, 53:406-414. 78. Lee Y, Lei H, Liu M, Wang J, Chen S, Jiang-Shieh Y, Lin Y, Yeh T, Liu C, Liu H: Autophagic machinery activated by dengue virus enhances virus replication. Virology 2008, 374:240-248. 79. Khakpoor A, Panyasrivanit M, Wikan N, Smith DR: A role for autophagolysosomes in dengue virus 3 production in HepG2 cells. J Gen Virol 2009, 90:1093-1103. 80. Heaton NS, Randall G: Dengue virus-induced autophagy regulates lipid metabolism. Cell Host Microbe 2010, 8:422-432. 81. Taylor MP, Burgon TB, Kirkegaard K, Jackson WT: Role of microtubules in extracellular release of poliovirus. J Virol 2009, 83:6599-6609. 82. Kemball CC, Alirezaei M, Flynn CT, Wood MR, Harkins S, Kiosses WB, Whitton JL: Coxsackievirus infection induces autophagy-like vesicles and megaphagosomes in pancreatic acinar cells in vivo. J Virol 2010, 84:12110-12124. 83. Lee DY, Sugden B: The latent membrane protein 1 oncogene modifies B-cell physiology by regulating autophagy. Oncogene 2008, 27:2833-2842. 84. Taylor GS, Mautner J, Munz C: Autophagy in herpesvirus immune control and immune escape. Herpesviridae 2011, 2:2. 85. Virgin HW, Levine B: Autophagy genes in immunity. Nat Immunol 2009, 10:461-470. 86. Fleming A, Noda T, Yoshimori T, Rubinsztein DC: Chemical modulators of autophagy as biological probes and potential therapeutics. Nat Chem Biol 2011, 7:9-17. 87. Easton JB, Houghton PJ: Therapeutic potential of target of rapamycin inhibitors. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2004, 8:551-564.

Current Opinion in Virology 2011, 1:196–203