Basal elevated serum calcium phosphate product as an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with fractures of the proximal femur—A 20 year observation study

Basal elevated serum calcium phosphate product as an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with fractures of the proximal femur—A 20 year observation study

Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 47 (2016) 728–732 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Injury journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/injury Ba...

332KB Sizes 3 Downloads 43 Views

Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 47 (2016) 728–732

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Injury journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/injury

Basal elevated serum calcium phosphate product as an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with fractures of the proximal femur—A 20 year observation study Florian M. Kovar a,*, Georg Endler b,c, Oswald F. Wagner b, Andreas Wippel a, Manuela Jaindl a a

Department of Trauma Surgery, General Hospital Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Austria Institute of Central Laboratory, General Hospital Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Austria c Labors.at, Vienna, Austria b

A R T I C L E I N F O

A B S T R A C T

Article history: Accepted 22 November 2015

Introduction: Fractures of the proximal femur are a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in the elderly population. Yet predictive marker of unfavourable prognosis are still lacking. Calcium phosphate product is a marker of osteo-renal dysregulation. This study investigated the role of serum calcium phosphate product (SCPP) levels as a prognostic parameter for outcome in those patients. Patients and methods: A total of 3577 consecutive patients with diagnosed fractures of the proximal femur were included in our study (72.5% females). SCPP was divided into tertiles: <1.92 mmol2/l2, 1.93– 2.38 mmol2/l2 and >2.39 mmol2/l2. Data collection was performed prospectively and statistical evaluation was performed retrospectively. Results: Mean follow up in our study group was 11.0  0.3 months. The mean age of our study group was 79.0 years (SEM 14 years). To facilitate analysis, patients were divided in two groups: 84 years (64.4%) and 85 years (35.6%), and mortality <12 months was 12.4% (n = 445). In our study population higher SCPP levels ad admission were associated with a markedly elevated mortality. In a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for age and sex, plasma creatinine and haemoglobin at admission caused a 1.3 (CI: 1.01–1.6) for SCPP 1.93–2.38 mmol2/l2, and a 1.6 (CI: 1.2–2.0) for SPP >2.39 mmol2/l2 fold increase in overall mortality compared to patients with baseline SCPP levels (<1.92 mmol2/l2) as reference category. Conclusion: Those findings in our study population with 3577 patients over a period of 20 years proved to be, that serum Ca levels may be a good predictor for mortality in patients with fracture of the proximal femur. Further studies are required to evaluate whether these high risk patients might benefit from specific therapeutic measurements. This prognostic factor may help to increase the outcome of elderly patients with a fracture of the proximal femur. ß 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Fracture of the proximal femur Mortality Elderly patients Serum phosphate product Gender Plasma creatinine Haemoglobin levels

Introduction Fractures of the proximal femur are a worldwide health problem, with several studies addressing the rates and risk factors that result in mortality following this injury [1–8]. The rising annual incidence of fractures of the proximal femur has made it

* Corresponding author at: Department of Trauma Surgery, General Hospital Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Waehringerguer 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Tel.: +43 1 40400/59020; fax: +43 1 40400/59490. E-mail address: fl[email protected] (F.M. Kovar). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.033 0020–1383/ß 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

one of the most common and expensive causes for admission following trauma [9–12]. The mean age of patients with fracture of the proximal femur is high, often over 80 years, and comorbidity in this patient group is therefore frequent [13–15]. Women make up at least 70% of all patients with a proximal femoral fracture according to literature [16,17]. Many studies have identified predisposing factors for fracture of the proximal femur, but little is known about independent risk factors for mortality in this selected patients group [8,12,18–23]. A possible association between mortality after fracture of the proximal femur and reduced haemoglobin levels at admission has already been reported in recent findings [19].

F.M. Kovar et al. / Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 47 (2016) 728–732

Calcium phosphate product is a clinically relevant tool to estimate the cardiovascular risk of patients with renal failure [24] and an early marker of osteo-renal dysregulation. SCPP levels are positively associated with unfavourable outcome in patients with chronic kidney disease, but there are also a few data related to chronic heart failure [25,26] and stroke [27]. Despite those findings, evidence that SCPP is an independent risk factor for mortality and morbidity is questioned by some authors [28]. However, up to now, little is known about the independent risk factor SCPP in patients with a fracture of the proximal femur. Although a study group around Rostami et al. investigated the correlation between SCPP and quality of life and hospitalisation, clear data on patients with fracture of the proximal femur are still missing [29]. The purpose of our study was to assess the relationship between serum calcium phosphate product (SCPP) levels at admission and morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with fractures of the proximal femur. Patients and methods A total of 3775 consecutive patients with a proximal femur fracture, admitted to our Department, from 1992 to 2012 have been considered for inclusion. Inclusion criteria included: proximal femur fracture, surgical treatment and availability of laboratory results. One hundred seventy eight individuals had to be excluded due to missing data resulting in 3577 individuals that were included in our analysis. Data collection was performed prospectively and statistical evaluation was performed retrospectively, approved by local IRB (EK 814/2010). Patients were identified from surgical records and hospital in-patient enquiry system. Patients’ clinical and demographic data were retrieved from our database. Laboratory findings at admission were retrieved from the database of Institute of Central Laboratory, General Hospital Vienna. Patients were classified in femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures, with a total number of 101 unclassified fractures, due to the fact that a clear disposition in one of the two groups was not possible. Study population was divided into the following sub-groups: SCPP was divided into tertiles to facilitate analysis. The lowest group with SCPP level at admission <1.92 mmol2/l2 served as reference group, followed by the second (1.93–2.38 mmol2/l2) and third tertile (>2.39 mmol2/l2). Patients not managed operatively were excluded from the study. Other exclusion criteria were pathological fractures and those patients who did not have a full blood count undertaken at admission. After discharge from hospital, patients were followed-up in a hip-fracture clinic. The primary outcome measured was the SCPP associated mortality. Plasma creatinine and haemoglobin levels were also observed. We were able to trace the outcomes of all patients by a data adjustment with the Austrian Death Register. Statistical methods For statistical analyses we used the SPSS 16.0 software package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Mean values and standard error of the mean were given unless otherwise indicated for continuous variables. Discrete data are presented as counts and percentages. A two-tailed values less than p 0.05 was considered statistically significant. p-Value was calculated to reference category with normal SCPP levels <1.92 mmol2/l2. To assess the value of SCPP levels as an independent risk factor for mortality we performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and sex. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated within our patients.

729

Results We enrolled 3577 patients with a mean age of 79 years (range 65–93). 72.5% were females, and 27.5% were male. Follow up was 11  0.3 months and approximately two thirds of the individuals were 84 years (64.4%) and around one third 85 years (35.6%). Gender distribution showed an overrepresentation of males in the reference group with SCPP level at admission <1.92 mmol2/l2 (n = 1.209, m 34.6%; f 65.4%) compared to the second group 1.932.38 mmol2/l2 (n = 1.214, m 23.1%; f 76.9%) and severe elevated >2.39 mmol2/l2 (n = 1.154, m 27.5%; f 72.5%). A total number of 390 patients (10.9%) died within 3 months. Mortality <6 months was observed in 416 cases (11.6%), and mortality <12 months was detected in 445 patients (12.4%). Overall mortality within follow up time was n = 545 (15.2%). Table 1 details the characteristics of the study population and the group disposition. Mortality hazard ratio compared to reference category is described in detail in Fig. 1. Elevated SCPP levels and admission were associated with statistical significant higher mortality. Even slightly elevated SCPP levels at admission caused a 1.3 (CI: 1.01– 1.6) fold increase in mortality, and severe elevated SCPP levels caused a 1.6 (CI: 1.2–2.0) increase in overall mortality (all values at p < 0.01). Our results have been adjusted according to age, gender, plasma creatinine and Hb levels to exclude possible bias.

Discussion The rate of mortality in our cohort at the various time intervals was similar to that which has been previously reported [5,8,19,30–33]. Not all studies agree on the effect of age, and male gender in independently predicting mortality [2,8,34– 41]. Although early mortality rates after fracture of the proximal femur are well reported, the cause of this mortality is less clear [34]. Despite the advances in the surgical and medical management of fractures of the proximal femur, data on recent trends are scarce [8,19,23,34]. It is well known that a higher serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is associated with increased risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities in haemodialysis and non-dialyzed patients [21,41,42]. In a study by Maruyama et al. a higher ALP was associated with an increased risk of both all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities in patients with fracture of the proximal femur [21]. In another study, Zoledronic acid proved to reduce the risk of death by 28% after fracture of the proximal femur, suggesting an even greater influence on cardiovascular events and pneumonia than on simply reducing secondary fractures [22]. Those findings together with other mentioned studies provide a possible strong correlation amongst vitamin D, calcium and phosphate metabolism as independent predictor for mortality [29,43–46]. The role of calcium phosphate product as an independent risk factor for mortality and morbidity is discussed controversial [28]. Despite that fact, there are abundant epidemiologic data showing correlations between SCPP and cardiovascular outcomes or mortality [28]. In a large cross-sectional study, both serum Ca and serum P concentrations were strongly associated with coronary calcification but SCPP was not analysed [28,47]. High concentrations of SCPP are also associated with an increased risk for allograft loss in kidney transplanted recipients [48]. Our results demonstrate lower mortality in patients with normal SCPP levels (reference group) compared to higher mortality rates in elevated SCPP levels (slightly and severe elevated group). Those findings suggest further substance to the thought that higher SCPP levels, may lead to higher mortality in elderly patients with fracture of the proximal femur.

F.M. Kovar et al. / Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 47 (2016) 728–732

730 Table 1 Illustration of calcium phosphate product.

Total patients Gender Male Female Age Mean in years 84 85 Follow up in months Mean (SEM) Type of fracturea Femoral neck Intertrochanteric Mortality <3 months <6 months <12 months Over all Other parameters Plasma creatinine (mg/dL) Hb levels (g/dL) * a

<1.92 mmol2/l2 Calcium phosphate product

1.93–2.38 mmol2/l2 Calcium phosphate product

N

n

%

1209

%

1214

>2.39 mmol2/l2 Calcium phosphate product

Total calcium phosphate product

n

n

%

1154

p

%

3577 <0.01

418 791

34.6 65.4

280 934

23.1 76.9

284 870

24.6 75.4

982 2595

27.5 72.5

79  0.4 787 422

65.1 34.9

80  0.4 732 482

60.3 39.7

77  0.5 784 370

67.9 32.1

79  0.2 2303 1274

64.4 35.6

11  0.6

11  0.5

12  0.6

<0.01

ns*

11  0.3

<0.01 485 595

106 112 121 137

1.01  0.01 12.7  0.1

49.6 50.4

8.8 9.3 10.0 11.4

536 649

45.2 54.8

124 133 140 172

10.2 11.0 11.5 14.2

1.02  0.01 12.4  0.1

455 656

160 171 184 236

1.26  0.02 12.1  0.1

41.0 59

13.9 14.8 15.9 20.5

1576 1900

390 416 445 545

1.09  0.03 12.4  0.01

45.3 54.7

10.9 11.6 12.4 15.2

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

<0.01 <0.01

Not significant. Not all fractures have been classified in our study population according the groups.

Limitations of the study Our study may have been emasculated by the fact that it was a prospective data collection and retrospective data evaluation study, performed at only one level I Trauma Centre. We only

evaluated predominantly Caucasian, Austrian patients, a study population that might not be comparable to other regions in the world. However there is no evidence that our findings might be biased by local environmental or population specific factors. In contrast due to the large sample size of 3577 consecutive patients

Fig. 1. Overall survival in individuals after hip fracture according to SCPP. Survival curves were calculated in a multivariate cox regression adjusted for gender, age basal Hb and creatinine.

F.M. Kovar et al. / Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 47 (2016) 728–732

with a follow up of 11  0.3 months, between 1992 and 2013 and the clear dose dependent statistical associations, we are confident that our findings might also be reproduced in other populations. Conclusion We could demonstrate a significant correlation between levels of SCPP and overall mortality in 3577 patients with a fracture of the proximal femur (p < 0.01). No differences between short and long term mortality have been observed. Our results have been adjusted according to age, gender, plasma creatinine and Hb levels to exclude possible bias. Those findings in our study population with 3577 patients over a period of 20 years proved to be that serum Ca levels may be a good predictor for mortality in patients with fracture of the proximal femur. Further studies are required to evaluate whether these high risk patients might benefit from specific therapeutic measurements. Conflict of interest There is no potential conflict of interest to declare for the entire study team. References [1] Elliott J, Beringer T, Kee F, Marsh D, Willis C, Stevenson M. Predicting survival after treatment for fracture of the proximal femur and the effect of delays in surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56(8):788–95. [2] Alegre-Lopez J, Cordero-Guevara J, Alonso-Valdivielso JL, Fernandez-Melon J. Factors associated with mortality and functional disability after hip fracture: an inception cohort study. Osteoporos Int 2005;16(7):729–36. [3] Daugaard CL, Jorgensen HL, Riis T, Lauritzen JB, Duus BR, van der Mark S. Is mortality after hip fracture associated with surgical delay or admission during weekends and public holidays? A retrospective study of 38,020 patients. Acta Orthop 2012;83(6):609–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012. 747926. [4] Hu F, Jiang C, Shen J, Tang P, Wang Y. Preoperative predictors for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 2012;43(6):676–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.05.017. [5] Diamantopoulos AP, Hoff M, Hochberg M, Haugeberg G. Predictors of shortand long-term mortality in males and females with hip fracture—a prospective observational cohort study. PLoS One 2013;8(10):e78169. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0078169. eCollection 2013. [6] Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Klocke NF, Callaghan JJ, Marsh JL. A risk calculator for short-term morbidity and mortality after hip fracture surgery. J Orthop Trauma 2014;28(2):63–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182a22744. [7] Thomas CJ, Smith RP, Uzoigwe CE, Braybrooke JR. The weekend effect: shortterm mortality following admission with a hip fracture. Bone Joint J 2014;96B(3):373–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B3.33118. [8] Mariconda M, Costa GG, Cerbasi S, Recano P, Aitanti E, Gambacorta M, et al. The determinants of mortality and morbidity during the year following fracture of the hip: a prospective study. Bone Joint J 2015;97-B(3):383–90. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B3.34504. [9] Bass E, French DD, Bradham DD, Rubenstein LZ. Risk adjusted mortality rates of elderly veterans with hip fractures. Ann Epidemiol 2007;17(7):514–9. [10] Giversen IM. Time trends of mortality after first hip fractures. Osteoporos Int 2007;18(6):721–32. [11] Sexson SB, Lehner JT. Factors affecting hip fracture mortality. J Orthop Trauma 1987;1(4):298–305. [12] Ha¨rstedt M, Rogmark C, Sutton R, Melander O, Fedorowski A. Impact of comorbidity on 6-month hospital readmission and mortality after hip fracture surgery. Injury 2015;46(4):713–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014. 12.024. [13] Grisso JA, Kelsey JL, Strom BL, Chiu GY, Maislin G, O‘Brien LA, et al. Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women. The Northeast Hip Fracture Study Group. N Engl J Med 1991;324(19):1326–31. [14] Roche JJ, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG. Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ 2005;331(7529):1374. [15] Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, Stone K, Fox KM, Ensrud KE, et al. Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. N Engl J Med 1995;332(12):767–73. [16] Jacobsen SJ, Goldberg J, Miles TP, Brody JA, Stiers W, Rimm AA. Hip fracture incidence among the old and very old: a population-based study of 745,435 cases. Am J Public Health 1990;80(7):871–3. [17] Endres HG, Dascj B, Lungenhausen M, Maier C, Smektala R, Trampisch HJ, et al. Patients with femoral or distal forearm fracture in Germany: a prospective observational study on health care situation and outcome. BMC 2006;6:87–100.

731

[18] Stewart NA, Chantrey J, Blankley SJ, Boulton C, Moran CG. Predictors of 5 year survival following hip fracture. Injury 2011;42(11):1253–6. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.injury.2010.12.008. [19] Kovar FM, Endler G, Wagner OF, Jaindl M. Basal haemoglobin levels as prognostic factor for early death in elderly patients with a hip fracture—a twenty year observation study. Injury 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.010. S0020-1383(15)00014-5. [20] Bretherton CP, Parker MJ. Early surgery for patients with a fracture of the hip decreases 30-day mortality. Bone Joint J 2015;97-B(1):104–8. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.35041. [21] Maruyama Y, Taniguchi M, Kazama JJ, Yokoyama, Hosoya T, Yokoo T, et al. A higher serum alkaline phosphatase is associated with the incidence of hip fracture and mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis in Japan. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014;29(8):1532–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/ gfu055. [22] Colon-Emeric CS, Mesenbrink P, Lyles KW, Pieper CF, Boonen S, Delmas P, et al. Potential mediators of the mortality reduction with zoledronic acid after hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 2010;25(1):91–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1359/ jbmr.090704. [23] Klop C, Welsing PM, Cooper C, Harvey NC, Elders PJ, Bijlsma JW, et al. Mortality in British hip fracture patients, 2000–2010: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Bone 2014;66:171–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.06.011. [24] Tertti R, Harmoinen A, Leskinen Y, Metsa¨rinnen KP, Saha H. Comparison of calcium phosphate product values using measurement of plasma total calcium and serum ionized calcium. Hemodial Int 2007;11(4):411–6. [25] Cubbon RM, Thomas CH, Drozd M, Gierula J, Jamil HA, Byrom R, et al. Calcium, phosphate and calcium phosphate product are markers of outcome in patients with chronic heart failure. J Nephrol 2015;28(2):209–15. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s40620-014-0075-y. [26] Grandi NC, Brenner H, Hahmann H, Wu¨sten B, Ma¨rz W, Rothenbacher D, et al. Calcium, phosphate and the risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in a population with stable coronary heart disease. Heart 2012;98(12):926–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300806. [27] Foley RN, Collins AJ, Ishani A, Kalra PA. Calcium-phosphate levels and cardiovascular disease in community-dwelling adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Am Heart J 2008;156(3):556–63. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.016. [28] O‘Neill WC. The fallacy of the calcium-phosphorus product. Kidney Int 2007;72:792–6. [29] Rostami Z, Hosseini MS, Lessan Pezeshki M, Heidari F, Einollahi B. Bone mineral metabolism and subsequent hospitalization with poor quality of life in dialysis patients. Nephrourol Mon 2014;6(1):e14944. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5812/numonthly.14944. eCollection 2014. [30] Lin ZZ, Wang JJ, Chung CR, Huang PC, Su BA, Cheng KC, et al. Epidemiology and mortality of hip fracture among patients on dialysis: Taiwan National Cohort Study. Bone 2014;64:235–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.04.017. [31] Hung LW, Tseng WJ, Huang GS, Ling J. High short-term and long-term excess mortality in geriatric patients after hip fracture: a prospective cohort study in Taiwan. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ 1471-2474-15-151. [32] Ray RI, Aitken SA, McQueen MM, Court-Brown CM, Ralston SH. Predictors of poor clinical outcome following hip fracture in middle aged-patients. Injury 2015;46(4):709–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.11.005. [33] Ireland AW, Kelly PJ, Cumming RG. Risk factor profiles for early and delayed mortality after hip fracture: analyses of linked Australian Department of Veterans’ Affairs databases. Injury 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.03.006. S0020-1383(15)00141-2. [34] Chatterton BD, Moores TS, Ahmad S, Cattell A, Roberts PJ. Cause of death and factors associated with early in-hospital mortality after hip fracture. Bone Joint J 2015;97-B(2):246–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.35248. [35] Buecking B, Eschbach D, Koutras C, Kratz T, Balzer-Geldstzer M, Dodel R, et al. Re-admission to Level 2 unit after hip-fracture surgery—risk factors, reasons and outcome. Injury 2013;44(12):1919–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.05.012. [36] Mossey JM, Mutran E, Knott K, Craik R. Determinants of recovery 12 months after hip fracture: the importance of psychosocial factors. Am J Public Health 1989;79(3):279–86. [37] Kenzora JE, McCarthy RE, Lowell JD, Sledge CB. Hip fracture mortality, relation to age, treatment, preoperative illness, time of surgery, and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984;(186):45–56. [38] Valizadeh M, Mazloomzadeh S, Golmohammed S, Larijani B. Mortality after low trauma hip fracture: a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012;13:143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-143. [39] Endo Y, Aharonoff GB, Zuckermann JD, Egol KA, Koval KJ. Gender differences in patients with hip fracture: a greater risk of morbidity and mortality in men. J Orthop Trauma 2005;19(1):29–35. [40] White BL, Fisher WD, Laurin CA. Rate of mortality for elderly patients after fracture of the hip in the 1980’s. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69(9):1335–40. [41] Lertdumrongluk P, Lau WL, Park J, Rhee CM, Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Impact of age on survival predictability of bone turnover markers in hemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013;28(10):2535–45. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft290. [42] Abramowitz M, Muntner P, Coco M, Southern W, Lotwin I, Hostetter TH, et al. Serum alkaline phosphatase and phosphate and risk of mortality and hospitalization. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;5(6 Jun):1064–71. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2215/CJN.08621209.

732

F.M. Kovar et al. / Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 47 (2016) 728–732

[43] Salomon A, Hepp B, Matrai A, Biro C, Agota K, Fata E, et al. Vitamin D supply of patients with hip fracture. Orv Hetil 2014;155(17):659–68. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1556/OH.;1; 2014.8.2987. [44] Anderson PH, May BK, Morris HA. Vitamin D metabolism: new concepts and clinical implications. Clin Biochem Rev 2003;24(1):13–26. [45] Zittermann A, Gummert JF. Nonclassical vitamin D action. Nutrients 2010;2(4):408–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu2040408. [46] Cauley JA, Chlebowski RT, Wactawski-Wende J, Robbins JA, Rodabough RJ, Chen Z, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and health outcomes five years after active intervention ended: the Women’s Health Initiative.

J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2013;22(11):915–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ jwh.2013.4270. Epub 2013 Oct 16. [47] Raggi P, Boulay A, Chasan-Taber S, Amin N, Dilon M, Burke SK, et al. Cardiac calcification in adult hemodialysis patients. A link between end-stage renal disease and cardiovascular disease? J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39(4 Feb 20;): 695–701. [48] Schaeffner ES, Fo¨dinger M, Kramar R, Sunder-Plassmann G, Winkelmayer WC. Prognostic associations of serum calcium, phosphate and calcium phosphate concentration product with outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. Transpl Int 2007;20(3):247–55.