Benign Mesenchymal Tumor of the Heart

Benign Mesenchymal Tumor of the Heart

review of cardiac tamponade as the presenting sign of extracardiac malignancy' revealed only 29 cases, of which four were sarcomas and 25 were carcino...

812KB Sizes 1 Downloads 108 Views

review of cardiac tamponade as the presenting sign of extracardiac malignancy' revealed only 29 cases, of which four were sarcomas and 25 were carcinomas. In this series, the most common primary type of extracardiac malignancy presenting with cardiac tamponade was lung cancer, though other varieties included pancreas, stomach, ovary, kidney, and lymphoma. Primary neoplasms of the heart and pericardium are quite rare, with a reported incidence rate of 0.001 to 0.28 percent of autopsy series." However, metastatic disease of the heart is surprisingly common with an incidence of about 10 percent of cancer-related deaths in autopsy series." Although cardiac symptoms during life are uncommon, clinical manifestations in such patients fan into recognizable patterns: 6 1) pericardial involvement, with findings such as effusion, tamponade, and constriction; 2) myocardial involvement, with findings such as rhythm disturbances, pump failure, cardiac rupture, and coronary artery occlusion; 3) endocardial involvement, with findings mimicking valvular stenosis and bacterial endocarditis; and 4) tumor thrombosis of cardiac chambers, with findings of chamber inflow and/or outflow obstruction. The lymphatic circulation of the heart and pericardium has been described in detail both in human and animal subjects." An extensive subendocardial plexus exists which empties through myocardial channels into a subepicardial plexus. Branches from this plexus then drain into larger trunks which generally parallel the coronary vasculature, ultimately exiting the heart into mediastinal nodal structures. Spread of tumor emboli through these lymphatics and direct invasion of the pericardium appear to be the major mechanisms for development of malignant pericardial disease. We emphasize the rapid and lethal progression of neoplastic cardiac tamponade which the current case exemplifies and which has been noted by others.' 1 However, Fraser et al" noted that the median survival time of those patients with neoplastic cardiac tamponade receiving pericardiectomy was 5~ months as compared to those who received either supportive care with pericardiocentesis (seven days) or radiation therapy or chemotherapy (five weeks). These considerations support an aggressive policy in dealing with this problem. Our experience with this case and others suggests that CT can be decisive in the establishment of this diagnosis and subsequent treatment planning.

REFERENCES 1 Larde D, Belloir C, Vasile N, Frija J. Ferrane J. Computed tomography of aortic dissection. Radiol 1980; 136:147-51 2 Wolverson MK, Grider RD, Sundaram M, Heiberg E, Johnson F. Demonstration of unsuspected malignant disease of the pericardium by computed tomography. CT: J Computed Tomography 1980; 4:330-33 3 Lopez-Cardozo P. A critical evaluation of 3,000 cytologic analyses of pleural fluid, ascitic fluid and pericardiaI fluid. Acta Cytol 1966; 10:455-60 4: Fraser RS, Viloria JB, Wang N-S. Cardiac tamponade as a presentation of extracardiac malignancy. Cancer 1980; 45:1697-704

5 McAllister HA Jr. Primary tumors and cysts of the heart and pericardium. Curr Probl audiol 1979; 4:8-51 6 Hanfling SM. Metastatic cancer to the heart: Review of the literature and report of 127 cases. Circulation 1960; 22:474-83 7 Cusumano F, De Le1lis R, Piotti P. Mesothelioma of the pericardium: Report of a case. Tumori 1980; 66:269-72

Benign Mesenchymal Tumor of the Heart* Spontaneous Regression and Disappearance of Pulmonary Artery Stenosis Yu-Chen Lee, M.D.; Robert T. Singleton, M.D.; and Chi1c-Kwun Tang, M.D.t

We describe a patient who was found to have a large benign mesenchymal tumor of the right ventricular

wall and right pulmonary artery stenosis at the age of 20 months. FoDowing biopsy of the tumor, the patient's respiratory dktress improved graduaDy and cardiac catheterization at the age of ten yean showed normal Intracardiac pressures and disappearance of right pulmonary artery stenosis. He remained asymptomatic at age 20. Possible facton for the spontaneous regression of the tumor are discussed. partial or complete disappearance of a tumor in the absence of treatment is a rare but well known phenomenon.t'" However, to our knowledge, spontaneous regression of cardiac tumors has not been reported. The purpose of this article is to describe a patient who had a large benign mesenchymal tumor of the heart which has regressed; pulmonary artery stenosis disappeared following biopsy of the tumor. CASE REPoRT

A 20-month-old baby was admitted to the University of Maryland Hospital on December 14, 1959. The prenatal history was unremarkable and the delivery was uneventfu1. Since the age of 14 days, he had been admitted to a local hospital on numerous occasions due to dypsnea and wheezing. He was found to have marked cardiomegaly, and treatment with digitalis failed to improve the symptoms. Physical examination on admission revealed a well-developed, wellnourished boy without cyanosis or clubbing. Blood pressure was 100/60 mm Hg, and pulse rate was ISO/min with frequent premature beats. The chest was symmebic and coarse rhonchi were heard throughout. The heart was markedly enlarged; a grade 3/6 ejection systolic murmur was heard over the base and the second heart sound at the pulmonic area was widely split. The liver was palpable 2 em below the right costal margin. Hemoglobin was 10 g/dl, white blood cell count was 11,500/ml with 65 percent polymorphs, 22 percent lymphocytes, 12 percent monocytes, ·From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Department of Pathology], University of Maryland Hospital, Baltimore. Reprint requests: Dr. Lee, Dimsion of Cardiology/Medfcine~ 22 Greene Street, Baltimore 21201 CHEST I 82 I 4 I OCTOBER, 1882

103

Ji'Icuml: 1. Chest x-ray film at age 20 months. The heart is markedly enlarged, and a large mass is seen on the right side of the heart at the base.

FroURE 2. Microscopic section of tumor showing spindle cells which display relatively scanty c:ytoplasm and elongated nuclei. No mitotic figures are present.

FiGURE

3. Chest x-ray film at age ten years. The cardiac

size is now normal. A large mass on the right side of the heart is no longer present. Pleuropericardial scarring on the right mediastinal area is seen.

504

and 1 percent eosinophils. Result of PPD slcin test was negative . Electrocardiogram revealed sinus tachycardia with frequent ventricular premature beats and right bundle branch block. The chest x-ray film revealed marked cardiomegaly and there was a suggestion of a large mass lesion on the right side of the heart at the base (Fig 1). Right heart catheterization was performed on December 21, 1959. There was no evidence of intracardiac shunt by blood oxygen analysis. The pressures (mm Hg) at the various sites were as follows: right atrium mean, 9; right ventricle, 60/5; main pulmonary artery, 60/18; left pulmonary artery, 60/18; right pulmonary artery, 25/16; and the pulmonary artery wedge mean, 13. Angiocardiogram showed a large, soft, tissue mass arising anteriorly on the right side of the heart and compression of the right pulmonary artery. There was no filling defect of the cardiac chambers. Exploratory thoracotomy was performed on March 10, 1960. There was a large multinodular, whitish, rubbery mass arising from the right ventricular wall extending to the pulmonary artery which appeared inoperable. A small section of the tumor was obtained for pathologic study and the chest was closed. The postoperative course was uneventful. The biopsy specimen consisted of fragments measuring 0.8 X 1.2 em in aggregate . The tissue was whitish in color, soft and homogeneous , partly covered by a greyish glistening membrane. Microscopically, some areas were more cellular than others. The tumor was composed almost exclusively of spindle cells which possessed elongated nuclei with inconsp icuous nucleoli. The cytoplasm was relatively scanty and eosinophilic. Long cytoplasmic processes were frequently observed. In the more cellular areas, the tumor cells formed bundles or fascicles, whereas in the less cellular areas, the tumor cells were arranged in a haphazard fashion and were separated by clear spaces. Masson trichrome stain demonstrated abundant extracellular collagen fibers. Cross striations were not identified by PTAH stain. No acceptable elastic fibers were found with Verhoff-von Gieson stain. There was a rich vasculature, mainly capillaries, within the tumor tissue. This tumor is unusual as it did not conform exactly to any of the recognized soft tissue lesions. It was believed to be a ben ign mesenchymal tumor and most likely fibroblastic. During the ensuing years, dyspnea and wheezing improved gradually, although digitalis was discontinued, and he did not receive any form of treatment. He was able to attend school and participate in sports activit ies. He was readmitted to the University Hospital on April 14, 1969 for cardiac catheterization at which time he was asymptomatic. Physical examination revealed a well-developed, wellnourished boy. The blood pressure was 120/78 mm Hg, and pulse rate, 62/min with occasional premature beats . The heart was not enlarged, no murmur was heard and the pulmonic second sound was physiologically split. The chest x-ray film showed no evidence of cardiomegaly and there was pleuropericardial scarring on the right mediastinal area (Fig 3). The electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm with occasional unifocal ventricular premature beats and incomplete right bundle branch bloc1c. Cardiac catheterization revealed no evidence of intracardiac shunts; intracardiac pressures (mm Hg ) were as follows: right atrial mean, 7; right ventricle , 30/4; main pulmonary artery, 28/14; right pulmonary artery, 28/14; left pulmonary artery , 26/16. Following discharge from the hospital , he has been examined periodically at the cardiology clinic. His exercise tolerance remains excellent Chest x-ray examination revealed no cardiomegaly; EOG was unchanged and echocardiogram was normal. Benign Mesenchymal Tumor of the Heart (Lee. Singleton. Tang)

DISCUSSION

Benign primary cardiac tumors are rather rare entities .••5 Correct clinical diagnosis is usually not made before surgical exploration or autopsy. Clinically, it may mimic various cardiac lesions such as endocardial Bbroelastosis,8 subaortic stenosis,7 or pulmonic stenosis.s Although classified as benign, such tumors frequently cause sudden. death by encroachment upon the cardiac cavities or compression of the conducting systems.f\,8 More recently, successful removal of the intramural ventricular cardiac fibroma have been reported in approximately 16 cases.•,5,9,10 Symptomatic improvement may occur as the patient becomes older. Hoen and associates" reported a patient who had cardiac failure in childhood in whom symptoms improved as the patient became older. At the age of 11 years, the patient underwent exploratory thoracotomy and a 6 X 4 em tumor was found in the left ventricular wall. Biopsy of the tumor demonstrated benign fibrous tumor. One and one-half years after the diagnosis of fibroma of the left ventricle was established, the patient's physical examination, chest x-ray film, and ECG revealed no change and exercise tolerance was unlimited. It was assumed that the tumor was present during the first year of life and there was no progressive enlargement of the tumor out of proportion to the growth of the normal myocardium. Our patient likewise had a large tumor producing recurrent episodes of dyspnea and wheezing, as well as right ventricular hypertension and right pulmonary artery stenosis up age to 20 months. Following exploratory thoracotomy and biopsy of the tumor, his symptoms gradually improved. In addition to the symptomatic improvement, chest x-ray examination revealed nonnalization of the cardiac silhouette, and right heart catheterization revealed disappearance of right ventricular hypertension and right pulmonary artery stenosis. These changes occurred without any form of treatment. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that spontaneous regression of the tumor took place. Several possible factors have been speculated upon for the spontaneous regression of tumors. These include: immunologic factors; elimination of a carcinogen; body response to operative trauma; hormone factors; role of irradiation; infection and/or fever; drugs," Our patient had gradual improvement of his symptoms following biopsy for his tumor and he did not receive any medication or radiation. Therefore, it is speculated that the most likely factor responsible for the spontaneous regression of the cardiac tumor in this case is due to operative trauma. It has been stated that operative trauma invokes a reaction that increases the patient's immunologic resistance to the tumor."

Of additional interest in this patient is the presence of pulmonary hypertension in the face of unilateral pulmonary artery obstruction and subsequent disappearance of both conditions. Clinically, in unilateral pulmonary artery stenosis, there is no major change in cardiac dynamics." However, in animal studies, Falkenbach et al1 2 observed progressive pulmonary hypertension after partial occlusion of the left pulmonary artery, but none when the left pulmonary artery was ligated. It has been speculated that hypoxia or ischemia of the lung may stimulate the right ventricle to increase pressure proportionately to the pulmonary artery coarctation.P

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Biopsy of the tumor was ­ formed by Dr. R. Adams Cowley. The authors would like to thank Dr. Leonard Scherlis for review of the manuscript, Dr. Sharon W~ Weiss, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology for her opinion on the biopsy specimen, and Debbie Trust and Liz Tinnell for secretaiial assis·tance.

1 Boyd W. The spontaneous regression of cancer. Can Cancer Conf 1957; 2:354-60 2 Everson TC, Cole WH. Spontaneous regression of cancer. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1966 3 Cole WH. Opening address: Spontaneous regression of cancer and the importance of finding its cause. In: Lewison EF, ed. Conference on spontaneous regression of cancer. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute Monographs, 1976; 44:5-9 4 Feldman PS, Meyer MW. Fibroelastic harmartoma (fibroma) of the heart. Cancer 1976; 38:314-23 5 Van der Hauwaert LG. Cardiac tumors in infancy and childhood. Br Heart J 1971; 33: 125-32 6 Hoen AG, Ellia EJ. Intramural fibroma of the heart. Am J Cardiol 1960; 17:579-84 7 McCue CM, Henninger GR, Davis E, Ray J. Congenital subaortic stenosis caused by a fibroma of the left ventricle. Pediatrics 1955; 16:372-77 8 Zander R. Fibroma des Herzens. Virchow's Arch Pathol Anat 1880; 80:507 9 Geha AS, Weidman WH, Soule' EH, McGoon DC. Intramural ventricular cardiac fibroma. Successful removal in two cases and review of the literabue. Circulation 1967; 36:427-40 Ii) Williams WG, Trusler GA, Fowler RS, Scott ME, Mustard WT. Left ventricular myocardial fibroma: A case report and review of cardiac tumors in children. J Ped Surg 1972; 7:324-28 11 Keith JD, Rowe ROt Vlad P. Heart disease in infancy and childhood, 2nd Ed. New York: Macmillan 1967; 587 12 Falkenbach KH, Zhentlin N, Dowdy AH, OLoughlin BJ: Pulmonary hypertension due to pulmonary arterial coarctation. Radiology 1959; 73:575-87

CHEST I 82 I 4 I OCTOIiER, 1882

105