Benthic foraminiferal assemblages as pollution proxies along the coastal fringe of the Monastir Bay (Tunisia)

Benthic foraminiferal assemblages as pollution proxies along the coastal fringe of the Monastir Bay (Tunisia)

Accepted Manuscript Benthic foraminiferal assemblages as pollution proxies along the coastal fringe of the Monastir Bay (Tunisia) Mohamed Damak, Fabri...

3MB Sizes 0 Downloads 65 Views

Accepted Manuscript Benthic foraminiferal assemblages as pollution proxies along the coastal fringe of the Monastir Bay (Tunisia) Mohamed Damak, Fabrizio Frontalini, Boubaker Elleuch, Monem Kallel PII:

S1464-343X(18)30354-6

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.11.013

Reference:

AES 3368

To appear in:

Journal of African Earth Sciences

Received Date: 13 April 2018 Revised Date:

11 November 2018

Accepted Date: 13 November 2018

Please cite this article as: Damak, M., Frontalini, F., Elleuch, B., Kallel, M., Benthic foraminiferal assemblages as pollution proxies along the coastal fringe of the Monastir Bay (Tunisia), Journal of African Earth Sciences (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.11.013. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Benthic foraminiferal assemblages as pollution proxies along the coastal fringe of the

2

Monastir Bay (Tunisia)

3 4

Mohamed Damak1, 2*, Fabrizio Frontalini3, Boubaker Elleuch1, Monem Kallel1

5

1

6

Sfax, BP 1173, 3038 Sfax (Tunisia)

7

2

Association Notre Grand Bleu (NGO), Cap Marina, 5000 Monastir (Tunisia)

8

3

Dipartimento di Scienze Pure e Applicate, Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo",

9

Campus Scientifico Enrico Mettei, 61029 Urbino (Italy)

RI PT

* [email protected]

SC

10

Laboratoire de Génie de l’Environnement et Écotechnologie (GEET), ENIS, Université de

11

Abstract

13

The Monastir Bay is one of the most important resources of marine diversity in Tunisia. The

14

marine biodiversity quality of its coastal area has been however affected by several industrial,

15

fishing and fish-farming activities. A multidisciplinary characterization based on geochemical

16

analyses of sediment and benthic foraminifera was undertaken to evaluate the environmental

17

quality of marine sediments. The geochemical data combined with the statistical results

18

suggests an overall contamination of sediment mainly by Zn, Ni and Cu and the identification

19

of an area particularly polluted. This zone corresponds to the area in front of the Khniss drain

20

that has been historically affected by the presence of multiple sources of pollution. The site is

21

also characterized by a poorly diversified benthic foraminiferal assemblage, reflecting the

22

poor environmental conditions. Some species such as Quinqueloculina seminula and

23

Vertebralina striata appear to be positively related to EF and might be considered as tolerant

24

taxa to pollution in the Monastir Bay. The present study further reinforces the application of

25

benthic foraminifera as proxies of pollution and as bioindicators of the environmental quality

26

and represents among the first contributions in a Tunisian coastal marine area based on living

27

benthic foraminifera as bioindicators.

29

TE D

EP

AC C

28

M AN U

12

1. Introduction

30

Benthic foraminifera are unicellular organisms with a widespread distribution from marine

31

to transitional marine environments (Murray, 2006). Many benthic foraminiferal studies have

32

proven the considerable value of these protists as bioindicators and have therefore been

33

widely applied to biomonitoring (i.e., Alve, 1995; Armynot du Châtelet and Debenay, 2010;

34

Frontalini and Coccioni, 2011, for review). Because of their widespread distribution, short life 1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT and reproductive cycles, high biodiversity, great abundance, and specific ecological

36

requirements, benthic foraminifera have been successfully used as bioindicators in coastal

37

marine environments (Frontalini and Coccioni, 2008). In this context, benthic foraminifera

38

have been used as bioindicators in areas affected by natural and/or anthropic stress including

39

salinity and temperature fluctuations, high organic matter input, low oxygen availability as

40

well as organic and inorganic pollutants (Alve, 1995; Yanko et al., 1999). Benthic

41

foraminifera commonly respond to adverse environmental conditions by changing the

42

assemblages’ composition and parameters (i.e., Alve, 1995).

RI PT

35

Although benthic foraminifera have been widely applied to assess the environmental

44

quality in the Mediterranean Sea areas (i.e., Debenay, 2001; Frontalini and Coccioni, 2008;

45

Coccioni et al., 2009), only a few studies have been performed in Tunisian coastal areas,

46

namely in the Gabes Gulf (Aloulou et al., 2012; Ayedi et al., 2015), in the northern coast of

47

the Sfax city (Mkawar et al., 2007) and Bizerte (Martins et al., 2015, 2016) and Djerba

48

lagoons (El Kateb et al., 2018). Traditionally, the environmental quality of Tunisian coastal

49

areas has been mainly assessed by considering the physico-chemical characteristics, heavy

50

metal, organic matter and hydrocarbon contents in sediments. The Monastir Bay is situated on

51

the eastern coast of Tunisia and is one of the most important resources of marine resource and

52

biodiversity along the Tunisian coast. However, a significant increase in industrial, fishing

53

and fish farming activities has severely affected the environmental quality (i.e., Sassi et al.,

54

1998a,b; Nouira et al., 2013a,b; Challouf et al., 2017). Several environmental investigations

55

have been carried out to monitor the heavy metal (Sassi et al., 1998b), organic matter (Sassi et

56

al., 1998a), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs)

57

(Nouira et al., 2013a) as well as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (Nouira et al.,

58

2013b) along the Monastir coast.

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

43

This study, for the first time, aims to survey the environmental quality of marine surface

60

sediment of the Monastir Bay coast by conventional chemical analyses coupled with benthic

61

foraminiferal ones, also to determine the relationships among geo-chemical data and benthic

62

foraminiferal distributions.

AC C

59

63 64

2. Study area

65

The study area, which is the littoral of Monastir-Teboulba (Monastir Bay), lies on the

66

eastern shore of Tunisia. The Monastir Bay waters are characterized by a weak hydrodynamic

67

regime due to the sub-marine topography (i.e., 3 m isobaths at ~2 km from the coastline of

68

Khniss-Ksibet El Mediouni and at ~900 m from the coast of Lamta-Sayada) (Souissi et al., 2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2004). In fact, the bathymetry, in the Monastir Bay, is irregular and extends in the major part

70

of the bay as a shore-flat (Sassi et al., 1998a; Nouira et al., 2013b). The bay is delimited by

71

two sandy shoals (Ras Dimes sand spit in the South-East of the bay, and El Enf sand spit in

72

the North-West of the bay) this acts as physical barriers between the shore and the open sea

73

(Fig.1).The shoal of Teboulba isolates more or less the bay from the open sea. The coastal

74

fringe represents a receptacle of multiple wastewaters from the urban zone (five ports, two

75

wastewater treatment plants, and the Khniss drain) as well as from active fish farms within the

76

bay (Nouira et al., 2013a; Challouf et al., 2017). The drain of Khniss collects domestic and

77

industrial wastewaters from riverine discharges and is considered as the main source of

78

pollutants (Nouira et al., 2013a). These wastewaters are directly discharged in numerous

79

points along the coast (Sassi et al., 1998a; Nouira et al., 2013a).

SC

RI PT

69

The Monastir Bay is considered as a semi-enclosed lagoon (Nouira et al., 2013a; Challouf

81

et al., 2017) and as a consequence of the confined conditions, nutrient-rich wastewaters have

82

progressively promoted the eutrophication and the establishment of anoxic conditions in

83

surface sediments (Sassi et al., 1998b).

84

3. Materials and methods

86

3.1 Field Sampling

TE D

85

M AN U

80

Sampling sites are placed along the coastal fringe of the bay from Monastir city to

88

Bkalta city. In August 2015, superficial sediment samples were collected from 10 stations

89

(Fig.1), at a water depth not exceeding 0.5 m, using 1-m2 quadrat. Sampling sites were

90

selected from a presumed near and between the pollution sources and human activities. From

91

each sampling site, 50 cm3 surface sediments were collected (upper 1 cm) in 3 replicates for

92

foraminiferal analyses and were immediately treated with a Rose Bengal solution (2 g of Rose

93

Bengal in 1 L of ethanol). Additionally, ca. 2 kg of sediment and 500 ml sea water were

94

collected, immediately frozen on dry ice and transported in a dark container to the laboratory

95

for grain-size and geochemical and physico-chemical analyses, respectively.

97

AC C

96

EP

87

3.2 Physico-chemical analysis of water

98

The physico-chemical parameters of water such as conductivity, pH and total dissolved

99

solids (TDS) were measured in the laboratory. The pH was measured by pH meter (model:

100

WTW inoLab® pH 720) and conductivity by conduct meter (model: WTW inoLab® 7110).

101

The TDS were measured following the method of Rodier et al. (2009).

102 3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 103

3.3 Grain-size analysis Grain-size analyses were performed using AFNOR mesh-type sieves (Ayedi et al., 2015).

105

Briefly, before the analysis, about 100 g of sediments were digested with hydrogen peroxides

106

(H2O2) solution to remove organic matter content (Folk, 1974 ) and then dried in an oven at

107

40°C. The grain-size was then classed as very coarse sand (2 mm-1 mm), coarse sand (1 mm-

108

500 µm), medium sand (500 µm-250 µm), fine sand (250 µm-125 µm), very fine sand (125

109

µm-63 µm) and silt and clay (<63 µm) (USDA-NRCS, 2002).

110 111

3.4 Organic matter

RI PT

104

Approximately 1 g of <2 mm dried sediment was finely grounded with mortar and pestle

113

for total organic carbon (TOC) and total nitrogen (TN) analyses. The TOC analysis was

114

performed following the Walkley and Black methodology which involves the titration with

115

ferrous ammonium sulfate of the dichromate left after a wet oxidation of the samples with

116

potassium dichromate (Walkley and Black, 1933). On the other hand, Kjeldahl digestion is

117

used for TN determination, following MA.300-NTPT2.0. The total phosphorous (TP)

118

contents were analyzed as orthophosphate following the Murphy and Riley (1962)

119

spectrophotometric method, after samples digesting and transformation of phosphorylated

120

compounds into orthophosphate. The digested solutions are attacked by sulphonitric acid and

121

in the presence of ammonium molybdate forming a complex phosphomolybdic anion, which

122

after reaction with ascorbic acid gives a blue color. The optical density was measured by

123

colorimetry at 880 nm and expressed in mg/g.

TE D

M AN U

SC

112

125

EP

124

3.5. Trace metal analysis

Concentrations of selected trace metals were analyzed in the sediment fraction <63 µm,

127

after digestion, in three replicates to minimize error, in a sequence of heating steps using a

128

ratio of 10:5 ml nitric acids (HNO3, 65 %) and hydrochloric acids (HCl, 36 %), respectively.

129

Extracts were then rinsed with an additional 2 ml HNO3, diluted 50 times with deionized

130

water and filtered. The digested samples were aspirated for Fe, Cu, Zn, Cr, Ni and Pb

131

elements through atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS).The detection limits (in ppm) were

132

0.006 for Fe, 0.022 for Cu, 0.008 for Zn, 0.05 for Cr, 0.01 for Ni and 0.05 for Pb.

AC C

126

133

In order to evaluate the trace metal sediment contamination, several indices, namely

134

Enrichment Factor (EF), the Contamination Factor (CF) and the Pollution Load Index (PLI)

135

of Tomlinson et al. (1980) were calculated.

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 136

The EF is considered to compensate the differential variability of trace metals in sediment

137

from geogenic (crustal) and anthropogenic (on-crustal) (Feng et al., 2004). Iron has been used

138

as a reference element (Likuku et al., 2013; Schintu et al., 2016). The EFis calculated as: [





]

]

[

[





]

]

RI PT

=

[

where [Metal sample]/[Fe sample] is the ratio of concentration of metal element to iron in the

140

sediment sample and [Metal background]/[Fe background] is the same ratio with background

141

value of standard average Earth’s crust. Turekian and Wedepohl (1961) indicated the Earth

142

metal background values (ppm) as following: Cr: 35; Pb: 7; Zn: 16; Cd: 0.02; Fe: 9800; Cu: 2

143

and Ni: 2. The EF’s categories proposed by Sutherland et al. (2000) were considered (Table

144

1):

SC

139

M AN U

145 146

Following Likuku et al. (2013), the degree of sediment contamination by metals was also

147

evaluated as CF defined as: =

149

! "# ] -[

$ %&'()*+,]

The determination of CF is shown in Table 2.

TE D

148

[

150

The PLI compares the concentrations of elements in the environment with the ones expected

151

when excluding anthropogenic contributions and is calculated as ./0 = √ 7

1 3

2 3

3 3 …

153

The PLI was calculated to estimate the metal contamination status (Table 3).

155

AC C

154

EP

152

+ where “n” represents the number of metals studied and the CF is the contamination factor.

3.6 Foraminiferal analysis

156

Living benthic foraminifera fauna mirror present environmental conditions, whereas total

157

fauna (live and dead) provide information on a longer time-scale (Jorissen et al., 2018). For

158

this reason, and for the scope of this study, the environmental assessment was based only on

159

the living benthic foraminifera. Immediately after sampling, sediments were treated with a

160

Rose Bengal solution (2 g of Rose Bengal in 1 L of ethanol) to separate dead and living

161

foraminifera (Schönfeld et al., 2012). Sediments were carefully washed, in the laboratory,

162

through a set of sieves (63 µm, 125 µm and 500 µm) to remove coarse and mud fractions. 5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT From each sample and replicate, three hundred living specimens, where possible, were picked

164

from the 125 and 500 µm fraction. The taxonomic identification was based following

165

previous studies on benthic foraminiferal assemblages (i.e., Loeblich and Tappan, 1987;

166

Cimerman and Langer, 1991). Several foraminiferal parameters, namely species richness (S,

167

number of species per sample), the Fisher α index (Fisher et al. 1943), dominance (D), the

168

Shannon-Weaver index or information function (H) (Shannon and Weaver, 1963), evenness

169

(J); and equitability (E) were calculated using the PAST - PAlaeontologicalSTatistics data

170

analysis package (version 1.68, Hammer et al., 2001).

171

3.7 Statistical analysis

SC

172

RI PT

163

Prior to the statistical analysis the selected abiotic data including EFs, salinity, TN, TOC,

174

TP, pH and mud (<63 µm) were logarithmically transformed to remove the effects of orders

175

of magnitude difference between variables and normalize the data (Brakstad 1992; Manly,

176

1997). A Q-mode Cluster Analysis (CA) was applied to study the similarities between the

177

stations. The analysis was based on the Ward’s linkage method and the Euclidean distance.

178

Additionally, both a Q- and an R-mode Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were conducted

179

to reduce large data matrices composed of several variables to a small number of factors

180

representing the main modes of variation. In the PCA, it is also possible to compute additional

181

variables (relative abundance of benthic foraminiferal species>1% and diversity indices)

182

which do not contribute to the results thereof. The ordination (CA) and multivariate (PCA)

183

statistical techniques were performed using Statistica 7.0.

184

EP

TE D

M AN U

173

185

4. Results

186

4.1 Physico-chemical parameters of water, grain-size and organic matter The mean concentrations of physico-chemical parameters in water are summarized in

188

Table 4. The pH value in the study area varied between 6.72 and 8.21. The water salinity

189

ranged from 27.03 and 48.01. The lowest water salinity was recorded at BM1 station.

AC C

187

190

In the entire bay region, the sediment samples were dominated by medium to fine sand (48

191

- 86 %) with a very minor mud content (Table 4). However, mud (<63 µm) was observed on

192

both sides downstream of Khniss drain (BM1 and BM2), in downstream of Oued El Souk in

193

Lamta (BM5), and in rear port and in front of cornice conversion of Teboulba (BM7).

194

The TOC content varied between 0.5 % and 5.25 % (Table 4) with a relative higher values

195

in BM1, BM5 and BM7. The TN ranged between 0.33 % and 1.67 % (Table 4) whereas TP

196

from 0.02 to 0.344 mg/g (Table 4). 6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 197 198

4.2 Concentration and distribution of trace metals The concentrations of metals along the coastal fringe of the bay of Monastir are reported in

200

Table 4. The highest concentration of Cr, Ni, Cu, Pb and Zn were found in BM1, BM2 and

201

BM7 sites that are located between the mouth of Khniss drain (BM1 and BM2) and to the

202

West of port of Teboulba (BM7). The distribution pattern of EF exhibited a minimal to

203

moderate enrichment of Cr and Pb in all stations; a significant enrichment of Pb was only

204

observed in BM5. Moreover, moderate to significant enrichments of Zn have been

205

documented in the entire coastal fringe. However, a significant enrichment of Ni and Cu in

206

the entire coastal fringe of the bay and a very high enrichment of Cu were documented in

207

BM5 (Fig.2).

SC

RI PT

199

The results of CFs show a low contamination of Pb and Cr along the coastal fringe. On the

209

other hand, a moderate contamination with Zn element was identified in BM1, BM2, BM3

210

and BM7 and a moderate contamination of Ni in BM1, BM2, BM3, BM4, BM7 and BM9. A

211

considerable contamination of Cu was instead observed in BM1, BM2, BM3 and BM7

212

(Fig.3).

M AN U

208

In order to reduce the effects of peaks of individual elements, an assessment of sediment

214

quality was carried out using PLI (Fig.4). The overall contamination of sediment along the

215

coastal fringe, based on the PLI values indicates a deterioration of site quality of sediment in

216

BM1, BM2 and BM3. Furthermore, baseline levels of pollution are shown from BM5 to BM9

217

and BM0.

219

EP

218

TE D

213

4.3 Foraminiferal distribution

A total of 37 species were recognized in the living assemblages along the coastal fringe of

221

Monastir Bay. Twenty-eight species (7 hyaline, 18 porcelaneous and one agglutinated)

222

exceeded 1 % of the assemblage in one sample (Fig. 5). Living assemblages were largely

223

dominated by Ammonia tepida (7.84 % on average), Quinqueloculina seminula (33.45 % on

224

average), Peneroplis planatus (10.6 % on average), Vertebralina striata (13.2 % on average)

225

and subordinately by Ammonia parkinsoniana and Elphidium crispum.

AC C

220

226

Species richness (S) varied from 8 (BM2 station) to 26 (BM1 station). The highest density

227

was found in BM0 station (2362 specimens per 50 cm3). Whereas the diversity, using Fisher α

228

index, ranges from 1 (BM2 station) to 5 (BM1 station; Fig.6).

229 230

4.4 Statistics 7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 231

The Q-mode CA resulted in the grouping of samples into two main clusters (A and B)

232

according to the bottom water and sediment characteristics (Fig. 7). The Cluster B is

233

represented by four stations (BM1, BM2, BM5 and BM7) resulting in those with higher level

234

of pollutants. All the other stations are grouped in Cluster A (Fig. 7). The PCA shows that ~66.4 % of the data variance can be explained by the first two

236

principal components (factors). The sediment characteristics (< 63 µm, TN and TP) and

237

salinity are the predominant elements in the first component, while the contributions to the

238

second component are mainly due to EFs and pH (Fig. 8). By projecting onto the

239

environmental components, the plotted position of the benthic foraminiferal assemblages’

240

parameters (Fig.8a) and species (Fig. 8b) as secondary or additional variables, it appears that

241

most of these biotic variables are influenced by the sediments’ characteristics. In particular,

242

benthic foraminiferal diversity indices are negatively related to EFs, whereas FD is somewhat

243

positively related to the mud fraction, TP and TN (Fig. 8a). Additionally, most of the species

244

particularly E. crispum, Elphidium complanatum, Rosalina bradyi, Adelosina ciliarensis, and

245

Adelosina pulchella are negatively related to EFs, only Q. seminula and Vertebralina striata

246

appear somewhat positively related to EF. Elphidum advenum and A. tepida are negatively

247

related to the first component so to the salinity gradient but positively related to TN, TP, EF

248

of Cr and mud fraction.

250

SC

M AN U

The Q-mode PCA groups stations mainly follow their environmental conditions in approximately the same groups obtained with the Q-mode CA (Fig. 9).

251

5. Discussion

EP

252

TE D

249

RI PT

235

Geochemical and benthic foraminiferal data were compiled and integrated to characterize

254

the sediment quality in the coastal fringe of the Monastir Bay. The area has been deeply

255

shaped by coastal development and affected by different human activities including the

256

discharge of multiple effluent sources for several years that have severely promoted stressful

257

conditions in the marine ecosystem (Sassi et al., 1998a,b; Zaouali and Ben Charrada, 2010;

258

Nouira et al., 2013a,b). Monastir Bay is considered as one of the most important resources of

259

marine species diversity with a high extent of the seagrass meadows, Posidonia oceanica L.,

260

within the Tunisian territorial waters (El Asmi et al., 2003; Zaouali and Ben Charrada, 2010).

261

The water quality represents one of the most important factors in the aquatic ecosystem for

262

biotic proliferation and can be impacted by anthropogenic activities. The lowest water salinity

263

recorded in BM1 station is attributed to the proximity of the freshwater input through Khniss

264

drain. The artificial drain of Khniss is considered as one of the most important terrestrial

AC C

253

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT inputs of water in the region. In addition to fluvial waters, this drain collects domestic and

266

industrial wastewaters from riverine agglomerations (Nouira et al., 2013b). The Khniss drain

267

also plays an important role in the environmental setting evolution of the Monastir Bay

268

coastal fringe where its discharges effect the physic-chemical sediment parameters . In fact,

269

BM1 station recorded high values of organic matter parameters such as TN, TP and TOC. The

270

organic carbon, buried and preserved in marine sediments, depends on several factors such as

271

the rich contributions of terrestrial input that is commonly more refractory, sediment

272

metabolic activity (humification), bottom-water O2 concentration and sediment particles

273

(Canfield, 1994; Burdige, 2007). The highest TOC value (5.25 %) recorded in BM5 station

274

might be attributed to different factors such as the discharge of wastewaters through the

275

treatment plant of Lamta, the input from the Oued El Souk in Lamta, sub-marine topography

276

and a weak hydrodynamic regime. The combination of these natural and anthropogenic

277

factors promotes the eutrophication and the enrichment of the organic carbon. The TOC and

278

TN values recorded in the coastal fringe of the Monastir Bay, are relatively higher than those

279

measured by Ayadi et al. (2016) in the southern coast fringe of Gabes Gulf with TOC and TN

280

ranging between 1.95 and 2.7 % and between 0.029 and 0.058 %, respectively. However,

281

Sassi et al. (1998b) assumed that the organic matter level in this zone could be due not only to

282

the high algal proliferation, but also due to the domestic wastewater discharges or to the

283

aquaculture stations.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

265

According to Donnici et al. (2012), the high values of organic matter, which are

285

geochemical carriers of metals as a result of its adsorption capacity, might correspond to high

286

values of heavy metals. In order to assess the contamination and to compensate for

287

mineralogy and grain-size differences, heavy metals content in the sediment sample are

288

commonly normalized to Fe by calculating enrichment factors (EFs) (Donnici et al., 2012).

289

The EFs support the definition of the distribution of anthropogenic sediment pollution by

290

confirming the high values of trace element EF in the Monastir Bay with significant

291

enrichments in Ni (between 4 and 17) and Cu (between 4 and 27) in the entire coastal bay.

292

Except for Ni and Cu, these values are relatively higher than those measured in the northern

293

coast of Gabes Gulf by Aloulou et al. (2012) and in the south coast of Gabes Gulf (for Cu) by

294

Ayadi et al. (2016). In our study, Ni and Cu EFs did not show any direct correlation with

295

organic matter and muddy sediment. Additionally, to evaluate the sediment contamination

296

degree by trace element, a contamination factor (CF) was determined. The overall sediment

297

contamination in the studied sites, based on the CF values, indicated that sediments were

298

moderately contaminated (1≤CF<3) by Ni and a considerable contamination (3≤CF<6) by Cu

AC C

EP

284

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT was instead observed in BM1, BM2, BM3 and BM7. On the basis of the Pollution Load Index

300

(PLI) values, BM1, BM2 and BM3 site exhibited quality deterioration. In fact, BM1, BM2

301

and BM3 stations represent the coastline from Khniss to Ksibet El Mediouni. This

302

deterioration results from the discharge of Khniss drain, dumped treatment plant wastewaters

303

of El Frina, aquaculture station and drift movement caused by swells dominating sections

304

North-Northeast, Northeast and East-Northeast (Sassi and al., 1998b).

RI PT

299

The Q-mode CA statistical analyses showed two well-defined groups of samples according

306

to their pollution degree. Specifically, cluster B includes all the stations with higher content of

307

combined trace elements and organic matter, and can therefore be defined as the polluted

308

ones. This cluster group includes BM1, BM2, BM5 and BM7 stations, however, cluster A

309

includes all the remaining stations with relative lower level of pollutants than cluster B. The

310

sediment pollution of cluster B stations could be the result of the dumping in the sea of

311

treatment plant wastewaters that are enriched in organic matter and whose preservation is

312

enhanced by the weak hydrodynamic regime (Sassi et al, 1998b). Although cluster A includes

313

all stations that are relatively low or not polluted, it also encloses BM3 that exhibits a

314

moderate deterioration of sediment quality according to PLI value (1.40). This result may be

315

explained by the fact that Q-mode CA accounts for all physico-chemical parameters.

M AN U

SC

305

The sediment quality of the Monastir Bay was not only evaluated by geochemical analyses,

317

but also by checking the characteristics of benthic foraminiferal assemblages and their

318

parameters. Numerous foraminiferal studies have considered heavy metal, organic matter and

319

water salinity to be important factors affecting benthic foraminiferal distribution and

320

assemblage change and underlined the suitability of benthic foraminifera in environmental

321

biomonitoring (Coccioni et al., 2009; Donnici et al., 2012; Schintu et al., 2016). Benthic

322

foraminifera generally respond to adverse environmental conditions by mainly undergoing

323

local disappearance, assemblage changes both in composition and parameters (i.e., diversity

324

and density), dwarfism, and possibly the development of test abnormalities (e.g. Alve, 1995;

325

Yanko et al., 1994; Frontalini and Coccioni, 2008). Although benthic foraminifera have been

326

widely applied as proxy of pollution, some areas have been poorly explored. In fact, this study

327

represents, to our knowledge, among the first contributions on benthic foraminifera as

328

bioindicators in the Monastir Bay. Similarly, the Tunisian coast has generally been

329

understudied and the only few contributions, mostly from transitional environments, are from

330

Gabes Gulf (Aloulou et al., 2012; Ayadi et al., 2016), the northern coast of Sfax city (Mkawar

331

et al., 2007), the Bizerte (Martins et al., 2015, 2016) and Djerba (El Kateb et al., 2018)

332

lagoons.

AC C

EP

TE D

316

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT On the northern coast of Gabes Gulf from Sfax city to Skhira Gulf, Aloulou et al. (2012)

334

applied the benthic foraminiferal assemblages as proxies of pollution. A total of sixty-eight

335

benthic foraminiferal taxa were identified and statistically related to heavy metal EFs and

336

total hydrocarbons. Lower values of density and diversity, and an increase in values of the

337

opportunistic species A. tepida and Haynesina germanica were associated with contaminated

338

sediments. Ayadi et al. (2016) documented the distribution of benthic foraminifera and the

339

sediment quality along the coastline of Skhira and Gabes (southern coast of Gabes Gulf). A

340

barren zone corresponding to the most polluted area and increasing values of diversity away

341

from this area were reported and some tolerant and sensitive species were identified.

342

Unfortunately, both these two papers due to the low number of living specimens consider the

343

total assemblages (living + dead) and represent the only ones, to our knowledge, in Tunisian

344

coastal environments.

SC

RI PT

333

A total of 37 species were recognized in the living assemblages along the coastal fringe of

346

Monastir Bay. This diversity value is comparable to the one documented in the southern coast

347

of Gabes Gulf (34 taxa) (Ayadi et al., 2016), but lower than those found in the northern part

348

of the same Gulf (68 taxa) (Aloulou et al., 2012). In the Monastir Bay coastal fringe, the

349

living foraminiferal density varied from 44 to 2362 reaching a maximum value at BM0

350

station. Low foraminiferal density, diversity and specific richness were recognized (BM2,

351

BM5 and BM7 stations) which belong to cluster B of Q-mode CA that are also characterized

352

by the highest pollution level. A PCA ordination diagram confirms these results. In fact,

353

benthic foraminiferal diversity indices are negatively related to EFs, and specifically to EFs

354

of Zn, Cu, Pb and Ni. Foraminiferal density also seems to be positively related to the mud

355

fraction, TP and TN. Similar results showing a diversity and density decrease were also found

356

in some areas receiving high heavy metal concentration such as El Mex bay, Egypt (Samir

357

and El-Din, 2001), the southern coast of Gabes Gulf, Tunisia (Ayadi et al., 2016) and the port

358

of Cagliari, Sardinia (Schintu et al., 2016). According to Coccioni et al. (2009), decreasing

359

diversity indices and species richness are expected in areas particularly affected by pollution.

360

In addition, benthic foraminifera might positively benefit from the organic matter input that

361

represent a source of nutrients and this might be the case of the positive relation between FD

362

and the mud fraction, TP and TN. Accordingly, Murray (1973) and Debenay et al. (1996)

363

have reported that an increase in pollution might lead to the presence of high individual

364

numbers belonging to a few opportunistic species. Numerous studies have focused on the

365

relationship between grain size and benthic foraminifera (i.e., Debenay et al., 1996; Samir and

366

El-Din, 2001). A positive correlation between muddy sediment and foraminiferal density

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

345

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 367

(Fig.8a) was also observed in the present studied area. Armynot du Châtelet et al. (2009)

368

explained this positive relation by the reduced nutrients’ availability in coarse sediments that

369

are also in agreement with the results of Alve and Murray (1999), Samir and El-Din (2001)

370

and Aloulou et al. (2012). This study also displays the wide distribution of Q. seminula along the coastal fringe of

372

Monastir Bay. Quinqueloculina seminula has been reported as a dominant species in the

373

Mediterranean lagoons, continental shelves and marshes (Murray, 2006; Langlet et al., 2014).

374

Moreover, this species has been inferred to be tolerant of low levels of oxygen and periods of

375

anoxia (Bernhard and Gupta, 1999; Martins et al., 2011; Martins et al., 2013; Langlet et al.,

376

2014). This study documents high percentages of Q. seminula at stations of cluster A of the

377

Q-mode CA, with a positive relationship with metals enrichment (Fig. 8, b). Most of

378

porcelaneous taxa are reported to be stress-sensitive to pollution but not Q. seminula (Barras

379

et al., 2014). Following the PCA plot, Q. seminula seems to be negatively affected by EFs of

380

several heavy metals and the total hydrocarbon in the northern coast of Gabes Gulf (Aloulou

381

et al., 2012). Vertebralina striata is the dominant species in the Monastir Bay and positively

382

related to anthropogenic environmental stress, which correlates positively with the majority of

383

heavy metals EFs. The dominance of A. tepida in our study might be linked to its tolerance to

384

relatively low salinity conditions and to pollution. In fact, A. tepida has been shown to be

385

tolerant of chemical pollution, hydrocarbons, fertilizing products, low salinity, and a high

386

concentration of trace elements (Coccioni et al., 2009; Frontalini et al., 2013). This taxon is

387

commonly encountered in transitional environments under stress (Yanko et al., 1994, 1999;

388

Alve, 1995; Debenay et al., 2001; Armynot du Châtelet et al., 2004; Frontalini et al., 2014;

389

Martins et al., 2014) and is frequently considered as a species tolerant to stress. According to

390

that, A. tepida is the dominant species at BM1 station, where high concentrations of organic

391

matter, heavy metals, and low water salinity values were recorded. Furthermore, A. tepida

392

was also positively correlated with mud fraction, TP, TN and EF.Cr. Ammonia tepida was

393

considered as a bioindicator of pollution in sediments from the Naples harbor (Ferraro et al.,

394

2006), in Augusta Harbor (Romano et al., 2009), along the coastal area of the Adriatic Sea

395

(Frontalini and Coccioni, 2008) as well as in different Tunisian environments such as the

396

lagoon of Bizerte (Martins et al., 2015, 2016), Gulf of Gabes (Aloulou et al., 2012). Ammonia

397

tepida and Q. seminula are considered to be quite tolerant of environmental stress (Debenay

398

et al., 2000; Debenay and Guillou, 2002), and these two species have been regarded as the

399

primary pioneers in several transitional environments (Debenay et al., 2009). On the other

400

hand, Ammonia parkinsoniana appears to be the species most affected by heavy metals and

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

371

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT organic matter, as revealed by the negative relation in the PCA plot (Fig. 8b). This taxon is

402

typical of coastal shallow environments and has been reported to prefer relatively clean

403

environments (Seiglie, 1975; Frontalini and Coccioni, 2008). Additionally, most of the

404

species and in particular E. crispum, E. complanatum, R. bradyi, A. ciliarensis, and A.

405

pulchella are negatively related to EFs indicating that they are, at least in this area, sensitive

406

taxa.

RI PT

401

407 408

Conclusion

The present work contributes to the evaluation of the environmental quality of the coastal

410

fringe of Monastir Bay by using an integrated approach based on geochemical analyses of

411

sediment and benthic foraminifera living therein. The geochemical data combined with

412

statistical results suggest an overall contamination of sediment mainly by Zn, Ni and Cu and

413

the identification of an area particularly impacted by metals. This zone corresponds to the area

414

in front of the Khniss drain that has been historically affected by the presence of multiple

415

sources of pollution. The site is also characterized by a poorly diversified benthic

416

foraminiferal assemblages that would reflect the poor environmental conditions. Some species

417

such as Ammonia tepida, Elphidium crispum, Elphidium complanatum, Rosalina bradyi,

418

Adelosina ciliarensis, and Adelosina pulchella are negatively related to EFs and can be

419

inferred as very sensitive taxa. On the other hand, Quinqueloculina seminula and Vertebralina

420

striata appear to be positively related to EF and might be considered as tolerant taxa to

421

pollution in the Monastir Bay. The present study further reinforces the application of benthic

422

foraminifera as proxies of pollution and as bioindicators of the environmental quality and

423

represents the first contribution on a coastal marine area based on living benthic foraminifera

424

as bioindicators.

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

425

SC

409

426

Acknowledgements

427

The authors are very grateful to the Editor-in-Chief Dr. Damien Delvaux, Ph.D and two

428

anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and valuable comments that have greatly improved

429

the paper. This work was conducted as part of the project financed by Critical Ecosystem

430

Partnership Fund (CEPF) under the direction of “Notre Grand Bleu” association. The authors

431

would like to thank Dr Manel Ben Ismail (Director of Notre Grand Bleu and Doctor in

432

Biological Sciences and Biotechnology) and Dr Leïla Chaari for their encouragement,

433

technical support and assistance in the field and laboratory.

434 13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT References

436

Aloulou, F., Elleuch B., Kallel M., 2012. Benthic foraminiferal assemblages as pollution proxies in the northern

437

coast of Gabes Gulf, Tunisia. Environ Monit Assess 84,777–795.

438

Alve, E., 1995. Benthic foraminiferal responses to estuarine pollution: a review. J For Res 25, 190-203.

439

Alve, E., Murray, J.W., 1999. Marginal marine environments of the Skagerrak and Kattegat: a baseline study of

440

living (stained) benthic foraminiferal ecology. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 146, 4171-

441

4193

442

Armynot Du Châtelet, E., Debenay, J-P., 2010. The anthropogenic impact on the western French coasts as

443

revealed by foraminifera : a review. Revue de Micropaleontologie 53, 129-137.

444

Armynot Du Châteleta, E., Debenaya, J-P., Soulard, R., 2004. Foraminiferal proxies for pollution monitoring in

445

moderately polluted harbors. Environmental Pollution 127, 27-40.

446

Ayadi, N. Zghal, I. Aloulou, F. & Bouzid, J., 2016. Impacts of pollutants on the distribution of recnt benthic

447

foraminifera: the southern coast of Gulf of Gabes, Tunisia. Environmental science and pollution research 23,

448

6414-6429.

449

Barras, C., Jorissen, F.J., Labrune, C., Andral, B., Boissery, P., 2014. Live benthic foraminiferal faunas from the

450

French Mediterranean Coast: Towards a new biotic index of environmental quality. Ecological Indicators 36,

451

719–743.

452

Bernhard, J-M, Sen Gupta, B-K., 1999. Foraminifera of oxygen–depleted environments. In B. K. Sen Gupta

453

(Ed.), Modern Foraminifera, Kluwer Academic Publishers. 201–216.

454

Brakstad, F., 1992. A comprehensive pollution survey of polychlorinated dibenzopdioxins and dibenzofurans by

455

means of principal component analysis and partial least squares regression. Chemosphere 25. 1611–1629.

456

Burdige, D-J., 2007. Preservation of Organic Matter in Marine Sediments: Controls, Mechanisms, and an

457

Imbalance in Sediment Organic Carbon Budgets? Chem Rev. 467-485.

458

Canfield, D-E., 1994. Factors influencing organic carbon preservation in marine sediments. Chem Geol. 315-

459

329.

460

Challouf, R., Hamza, A., Mahfoudhi, M., Ghozzi K., Bradai M-N., 2017. Environmental assessment of the

461

impact of cage fish farming on water quality and phytoplankton status in Monastir Bay (eastern coast of Tunisia)

462

Aquacult Int 25, 2275-2292.

463

Cimerman, F., Langer, M-R., 1991. Mediterranean foraminifera.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

435

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Coccioni, R., Frontalini, F., Marsili, A., Mana, D., 2009. Benthic foraminifera and trace element distribution: A

465

case-study from the heavily polluted lagoon of Venice (Italy). Marine Pollution Bulletin 59. 257–267.

466

Debenay, J.-P., Della Patrona, L., Goguenheim, H., 2009. Colonization of coastal environments by Foraminifera:

467

Insight from shrimp ponds of New Caledonia (SW Pacific). Journal of Foraminiferal Research 39, 249-266.

468

Debenay, J.-P., Guillou, J.-J., Redois, F., and Geslin, E., 2000. Distribution trends of foraminiferal assemblages

469

in paralic environments: a base for using foraminifera as bioindicators. Environmental Micropaleontology, 39-

470

67.

471

Debenay, J.-P., Tsakiridis, E., Soulard, R., and Grossel, H., 2001. Factors determining the distribution of

472

foraminiferal assemblages in Port Joinville Harbor (Ile d’Yeu, France): the influence of pollution, Mar.

473

Micropaleontol. 43, 75–118.

474

Debenay, J-P., Della Patrona, L., Goguenheim, H., 2009. Colonization of coastal environments by foraminifera:

475

in sight from shrimp ponds in New Caledonia(SW Pacific). J. Foramin. Res. 39, 249–266.

476

Debenay, J-P., Guillou, J-J., 2002. Ecological transitions indicated by foraminiferal assemblages in paralic

477

environments. Estuaries 25, 1107-1120.

478

Debenay, J-P., Pawlowski, J., Decrouez, D., 1996. Les foraminifères actuels, Masson, Paris Milan Barcelone, 1-

479

230.

480

Donnici, S., Serandrei-Barbero, R., Bonardi, M., Sperle, M., 2012. Benthic foraminifera as proxies of pollution:

481

The case of Guanabara bay (Brazil). Marine Pollution Bulletin 64, 2015-2028.

482

El Asmi-Djellouli, Z., Djellouli, A., Pergent-Martini, CH, Pergent, G., Abdeljaoued, S., El Abed, A., 2003.

483

Interactions entre l’herbier à Posidonia oceanica et l’hydrodynamisme au sein de la baie de Monastir (Tunisie

484

orientale). Actes 2 symposium méditerranéen sur la végétation marine, Athènes, 12-13 décembre 2003, UNEP,

485

MAP, RAC/SPA, Simpact ed, Tunis, 93-99.

486

El Kateb, A., Claudio Stalder, C., Neururer, C., Fentimen R., Spangenberg, J.E., Spezzaferri S., 2018.

487

Distribution of benthic foraminiferal assemblages in the transitional environment of the Djerba lagoon (Tunisia).

488

Swiss Journal of Geosciences, 1-18.

489

Feng, H., Han, X., Zhang, W. & Yu, L., 2004. A preliminary study of heavy metal contamination in yangtze

490

river intertidal zone due to urbanization. Marine pollution Bullentin 49, 910-915.

491

Ferraro, L., Sprovieri, M., Alberico, I., Lirer F., Prevedello, L., Marsella, E., 2006. Benthic foraminifera and

492

heavy metals distribution: a case study from the Naples Harbour (Tyrrhenian Sea, Southern Italy). Environ

493

Pollut 142. 274–87.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

464

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Fisher, R-A., Corbet, A-S., Williams, C-B., 1943. The Relation Between the Number of Species and the Number

495

of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population. Journal of Animal Ecology 12, 42-58.

496

Folk R-L., 1974. Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Hemphill, austin.

497

Frontalini, F., Buosi, C., Da Pelo, S., Coccioni, R., Cherchi, A., Bucci, C., 2009. Benthic foraminifera as bio-

498

indicators of trace element pollution in the heavily contaminated Santa Gilla lagoon (Cagliari, Italy). Mar Pollut

499

Bull. 58, 858-877

500

Frontalini, F., Coccioni, R., 2008. Benthic foraminifera for heavy metal pollution monitoring: A case study from

501

the central Adriatic Sea coast of Italy. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 76. 404-417.

502

Frontalini, F., Coccioni, R., 2011. Benthic foraminifera as bioindicators of pollution: a review of Italian research

503

over the last three decades. Revue de Micropaléontologie 54, 2, 115–127.

504

Frontalini, F., Margaritelli, G., Francescangeli, F., Rettori ,R., Armynot du Châtelet E., Coccioni R., 2013.

505

Benthic Foraminiferal Assemblages and Biotopes in a Coastal Lake: The Case Study of Lake Varano (Southern

506

Italy). Acta Protozool. 52: 147–160.

507

Frontalini, F., Semprucci, F., Armynot du Châtelet, E., Francescangeli, F., Margaritelli, G., Rettori, R., Spagnoli,

508

F., Balsamo, M., Coccioni, R., 2014. Biodiversity trends of the meiofauna and foraminifera assemblages of Lake

509

Varano (southern Italy). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 127, 7-22.

510

Hammer, O., David A.T. Harper, D.A.T., Ryan P.D., 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package

511

for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4, 1-9.

512

Jorissen, F., Nardelli, M. P., Almogi-Labin, A., Barras, C., Bergamin, L., Bicchi, E., El Kateb, A., Ferraro, L.,

513

McGann, M., Morigi, C., Romano, E., Sabbatini, A., Schweizer, M., Spezzaferri, S., 2018. Developing Foram-

514

AMBI for biomonitoring in the Mediterranean: Species assignments to ecological categories. Marine

515

Micropaleontology 140, 33-45.

516

Langlet, D., Baal, C., Geslin, E., Metzger, E., Zuschin, M., Riedel, B., Risgaard-Petersen, N., Stachowitsch, M.,

517

Jorissen, F.J., 2014. Foraminiferal species responses to in situ, experimentally induced anoxia in the Adriatic

518

Sea. Biogeosciences, 11, 1775–1797.

519

Likuku A.S., Mmolawa K.B., Gaboutloeloe G.K., 2013. Assessment of Heavy Metal Enrichment and Degree of

520

Contamination Around the Copper-Nickel Mine in the Selebi Phikwe Region, Eastern Botswana. Environment

521

and Ecology Research 1(2), 32-40.

522

Loeblich, A.R., Tappan, H., 1987. Foraminiferal genera and their classifica tion. Van Nostrant Reinhold, New

523

York.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

494

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT MA.300-NTPT2.0, 2014. Détermnation de l’azote total Kjeldahl et du phophore total: digestion acide-méthode

525

colorimètrique automatisée. Centre d’expertise en analyse environnemental du Québec. 1-16.

526

Manly B-F-J., 1997. Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman and Hall, New York.

527

Martins M-V., Helali M-A., Zaaboub N., Boukef-Benomrane I., Frontalini F., Reis D., Portela H., Clemente I-

528

M., Nogueira L., Pereira E., Miranda P., El Bour, M., Aleya, L., 2016. Organic matter quantity and quality,

529

metals availability and foraminiferal assemblages as environmental proxy applied to the Bizerte Lagoon

530

(Tunisia). Mar Pollut Bull.,161-179.

531

Martins, M.V., Zaaboub, N., Aleya L., Frontalini, F., Pereira, E., Miranda, P., Mane, M., Rocha, F., Laut, M., El

532

Bour, M., 2015. Environmental Quality Assessment of Bizerte Lagoon (Tunisia) Using Living Foraminifera

533

Assemblages and a Multiproxy Approach. PLoS One. 2015; 10(9): e0137250.

534

Martins, V., Yamashita, C., Sousa, S.H.M., Martins, P., Laut L.L.M., Figueira R.C.L., Mahiques M-M., Ferreira

535

Da Silva, E., Alveirinho Dias, J-M., Rocha, F., 2011. The response of benthic foraminifera to pollution and

536

environmental stress in Ria de Aveiro (N Portugal). Journal of Iberian Geology 37 (2), 231-246.

537

Martins, V.A., Frontalini, F., Tramonte, K.M., Figueira, R.C., Miranda, P., Sequeira, C., Fernández-Fernández,

538

S., Dias, J.A., Yamashita, C., Renó, R., Laut, L.L., Silva, F.S., Rodrigues, M.A., Bernardes, C., Nagai, R., Sousa,

539

S.H., Mahiques, M., Rubio, B., Bernabeu, A., Rey, D., Rocha, F., 2013. Assessment of the health quality of Ria

540

de Aveiro (Portugal): heavy metals and benthic foraminifera. Mar Pollut Bull. 70, 18-33.

541

Martins, V.A, Frontalini, F., Rodrigues, M.A., Dias, J.M.A., Laut, L.L.M., Silva, F.S., Clemente, I.M.M.M.,

542

Reno, R., Moreno, J., Sousa, S.M.S., Zaaboub, N., El Bour, M., and Rocha, F., 2014. Foraminiferal Biotopes and

543

their Distribution Control in Ria de Aveiro (Portugal): a multiproxy approach. Environmental Monitoring and

544

Assessment 186, 8875–8897. doi:10.1007/s10661-014-4052-7

545

Mkawar, S., Azri, CH., Kamoun, F., Montacer, M., 2007. Biologic impact of the anthropic effluents (particularly

546

heavy metals) rejected on the Northern coast of Sfax city (Tunisia). TSM 10, 71-85.

547

Murphy, J., Riley, J-P., 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate solution in

548

natural waters. Analytic chimica acta 27. Department of oceanography, the university, Liverpool (Great Britain)

549

31-37.

550

Murray, J.W., 1973. Distribution and Ecology of Living Benthic Foraminiferids. Heinemann, London.

551

Murray, J.W., 2006. Ecology and Applications of Benthic Foraminifera. Cambridge University Press, New

552

York.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

524

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Nouira, T., Risso, C., Lassaad C., Budzinski, H., Boussetta, H., 2013,a. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and

554

Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) in surface sediments from Monastir Bay (Tunisia, Central

555

Mediterranean): Occurrence, distribution and seasonal variations. Chemosphere 93, 487-493.

556

Nouira, T., Tagorti, M.A., Budzinski, H., Etchebert, H., Boussetta, H., 2013,b. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

557

(PAHs) in surface sediments of Monastir Bay (Tunisia, Central Mediterranean): distribution, origin and seasonal

558

variations. Intern. J. Environ. Anal. Chem 96, 1470-1483.

559

Rodier, J., Legube, B., Merlet N., Coll., 2009. L’analyse de l’eau. Dunod, Paris.

560

Romano, E., Bergamin, L., Magno M.C., Ausili A., 2009. Sediment characterization of the highly impacted

561

Augusta harbour (Sicily, Italy): modern benthic foraminifera in relation to grain-size and sediment geochemistry.

562

Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts 15, 930-946.

563

Samir, A.M., El-Din, A.B., 2001. Benthic foraminiferal assemblages and morphological abnormalities as

564

pollution proxies in two Egyptian bays. Marine Micropaleontology 41, 193-227.

565

Sassi, R., Souissi, F., Soussi, N., Baccar, F., Added, A., Charef, A., Abdejaoued, S., 1998b. Diagnostic

566

environnemental du nord de la baie de Monastir (Tunisie orientale) par l’étude géochimique des sédiments

567

superficiels. Bulletin des laboratoires des ponts et chassées-218. REF. 4215, 49-58.

568

Sassi, R., Souissi, F., Soussi, N., Boukaaba, M. & Belayouni, H., 1998a. Organic matter geochemisty to analyse

569

the degradation of the Monastir-Ksibet El Mediouni littoral (Eastern Tunisia). Earth & planetary Sciences 327,

570

303-308.

571

Schintu, M., Marrucci, A., Marras, B., Galgani, F., Buosi, C, Ibba, A., Cherchi, A., 2016. Heavy metal

572

accumulation in surface sediments at the port of Cagliari (Sardinia, western Mediterranean): Environmental

573

assessment using sequential extractions and benthic foraminifera. Marine Pollution Bulletin 111, 45-56.

574

Schönfeld, J., Alve, E., Geslin, E., Jorissen, F., Korsun, S., Spezzaferri, S., 2012. The FOBIMO (FOraminiferal

575

BIo-MOnitoring) initiative—Towards a standardised protocol for soft-bottom benthic foraminiferal monitoring

576

studies. Marine Micropaleontology 94–95, 1–13.

577

Seiglie, G.A., 1975. Foraminifers of Guayanilla Bay and their use as environmental indicators. Rev. Esp.

578

Micropaleontol. 7, 453-487

579

Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W., 1963. Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press,

580

Urbana, 144.

581

Souissi, R., Turki, I., Souissi F., 2014. Effect of submarine morphology on environment quality: case on

582

Monastir Bay (eastern Tunisia) Carpathian journal of earth and environmental science, V.9. 231-239.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

553

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Sutherland, R.A., Tolosa, C.A., Tack, F.M.G., Verloo, M.G., 2000. Characterization of Selected Element

584

Concentrations and Enrichment Ratios in Background and Anthropogenically Impacted Roadside Areas. Arch.

585

Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 38, 428–438.

586

Tomlinson, D.L., Wilson, J.G., Harris, C.R., Jeffrey, D.W., 1980. Problems in the assessment of heavy-metal

587

levels in estuaries and the formation of a pollution index. Helgoländer Meeresunters. 33, 566-575.

588

Turekian, K.K., Wedepohl, K.H., 1961. Distribution of the elements in some major units of the earth's crust.

589

Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 72 (2), 175–192.

590

USDA-NRCS, 2002. Field book for description and sampling soils. National soil survey center natural sources

591

conservations service U.S. department of agriculture, 1-228.

592

Walkley, A., Black, I.A., 1933. An examination of degtjareff method of determination soil organic matter and a

593

proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Rothamsted experimental station, England. 29-38.

594

Yanko, V., Ahmad, M., Kaminski, M., 1999. Morphological deformities of benthic foraminiferal tests in

595

response to pollution by heavy metals: implications for pollution monitoring. Journal of Foraminiferal Research,

596

28. 177–200.

597

Yanko, V., Kronfeld, J., Flexer, A., 1994. Foraminifera as Environmental Condition Indicators in Todos os

598

Santos Bay (Bahia, Brazil). Journal of Foraminiferal Research. 24. 1-17.

599

Zaouali, J., Ben Charradar, 2010. Impact des actions anthropiques sur le phytobenthos de la baie de monastir.

600

Proceedings of the 4th mediterranean symposium on marine vegetation. UNEP, MAP, RAC/SPA. 135-140.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP AC C

601

RI PT

583

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figures and Table captions

603

Figure 1. Geographical map of the study areas and sampling stations (BM).

604

Figure 2. Trace metal enrichment factors distribution in coastal fringe of the Bay of Monastir.

605

Figure 3. Contamination factor distribution in the coastal fringe of the Bay of Monastir.

606

Figure 4. PLI values in the coastal fringe of the Bay of Monastir.

607

Figure 5. Relative abundance (%) of benthic foraminiferal taxa in coastal fringe of the Bay of Monastir.

608

Figure 6. Distribution of foraminiferal parameters in the study area (a: foraminiferal density, b: Species richness,

609

c: Dominance, d: Shannon-Weaver, e: Evenness, f: Fisher α, j: Equitability).

610

Figure 7. Sampling stations plotted on Q-mode CA.

611

Figure 8. R-mode PCA ordination diagram of samples based on the environmental components and benthic

612

foraminiferal assemblages’ parameters (a) and species (b).

613

Figure 9. Q-mode PCA ordination of stations with cluster as defined by Q-mode CA.

614

Table 1.Enrichment factors for metals and terminologies (Sutherland et al.,2000).

615

Table 2. Contamination factors (Likuku et al., 2013).

616

Table 3. Pollution Load Index description (Tomlinson et al., 1980).

617

Table 4: Sediment and water parameters.

SC

M AN U

AC C

EP

TE D

618

RI PT

602

20

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

619 620

Fig. 1: Geographical map of the study areas and sampling stations (BM).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

621

21

Fig. 2: Trace metal enrichment factors distribution in coastal fringe of the bay of Monastir.

SC

622 623

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

624

22

625 626

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 3 : Contamination factor distribution in the coastal fringe of the bay of Monastir.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

627

23

628 629

Fig. 4: PLI values in the coastal fringe of the bay of Monastir.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

630

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

24

631 632

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 5: Relative abundance (%) of benthic foraminiferal taxa in coastal fringe of the bay of Monastir.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

633

25

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

M AN U

SC

634

AC C

EP

636

TE D

635

637 638

Fig. 6: Distribution of foraminiferal parameters in the study area (a: foraminiferal density, b: Species richness, c:

639

Dominance, d: Shannon-Weaver, e: Evenness, f: Fisher α, j: Equitability).

26

Fig. 7: Sampling stations plotted on Q-mode CA.

SC

640 641

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

642

27

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 8: PCA ordination diagram of samples based on the environmental components and benthic foraminiferal

645

assemblages’ parameters (a) and species (b).

AC C

EP

TE D

646

M AN U

643 644

28

Fig. 9: Dendrogram classification of stations produced by Q-mode.

SC

647 648

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

649

29

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT EF Terminologies

EF < 2

Minimal enrichment

2 ≤ EF <5

Moderate enrichment

5 ≤ EF <20

Significant enrichment

20 ≤ EF <40

Very high enrichment

EF ≥ 40

Extremely high enrichment

Table 1: Enrichment factors for metals and terminologies (Sutherland et al., 2000).

RI PT

650

EF Classes

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

651

30

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT CF Classes

652

CF Terminologies

CF < 1

Low contamination

1 ≤ CF <3

Moderate contamination

3 ≤ CF <6

Considerable contamination

CF ≥ 6

Very high contamination

Table 2: Contamination factors (Likuku et al., 2013).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

653

31

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

654

PLI

Description

<1

No pollution

1

Baseline levels of pollution

>1

Deterioration of site quality

Table 3: Pollution Load Index description (Tomlinson et al., 1980).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

655

32

BM0

BM1

BM2

BM3

BM4

BM5

BM6

BM7

BM8

BM9

pH

7.37

7.56

7.68

7.74

6.72

7.37

7.53

7.47

8.21

8.04

Conductivity (ms/cm)

56.9

36.8

59.7

59.1

57

58

57.8

59.6

57.1

60.7

Salinity (mg/l)

44.06

27.03

44.81

46

44.37

45.14

44.96

46.45

44.13

48.01

Very coarse sand

1

2.78

12.00

0.24

0.42

0.43

1.11

0.44

0.31

1.00

Coarse sand

0.9

15.27

7.93

3.06

6.37

11.18

2.52

10.21

2.77

1.61

2.3

20.06

20.11

27.67

50.51

41.32

39.92

39.48

22.15

3.85

75.80

28.64

38.29

50.63

32.03

33.44

46.17

31.65

55.05

57.66

Very fine sand

19.4

30.23

19.91

17.79

10.22

12.72

9.84

16.60

18.63

35.81

Silt and clay

0.2

2.83

1.55

0.51

TN (%)

0.36

1.67

1.43

1.40

TOC (%)

0.5

3.75

2.5

2.75

TP (mg/g)

0.15

0.34

0.04

0.02

Cr (ppm)

0.54

13.96

12.00

0.00

Ni (ppm)

1.93

4.95

4.13

Fe (ppm)

2347.28

4147.76

3566.32

Cu (ppm)

2.11

8.23

7.08

Pb (ppm)

3.41

7.86

6.76

Zn (ppm)

13.12

46.16

39.69

PLI

0.36

1.67

1.43

Table 4: Sediment and water parameters.

M AN U

0.88

0.31

1.48

0.66

0.18

0.33

0.59

0.60

0.78

0.63

0.59

2.67

5.25

2.25

4.75

1.75

1.75

0.07

0.13

0.09

0.16

0.07

0.07

1.08

0.00

0.00

1.58

0.00

1.98

4.12

2.52

1.33

1.14

2.61

1.49

3.33

3948.37

760.44

385.55

845.05

2421.91

1036.03

1875.59

7.06

1.45

2.10

1.75

9.71

1.80

3.28

3.30

1.80

1.96

2.20

6.35

2.51

5.21

25.10

8.32

6.08

8.00

18.07

6.47

9.96

1.40

0.33

0.59

0.60

0.78

0.63

0.59

TE D

0.37

EP

Fine sand

%

AC C

Medium sand

SC

Stations

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

33

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

1

34

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights:

2

Monastir Bay is one of the most important resources of marine species in Tunisia.

3

Trace metals pollution has detrimental effects on benthic foraminifera assemblages.

4

Geochemical and foraminiferal analyses reveal deteriorated conditions.

5

Foraminiferal taxa have the potential to be used as trace metals bioindicators.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

1