Accepted Manuscript Benthic foraminiferal assemblages as pollution proxies along the coastal fringe of the Monastir Bay (Tunisia) Mohamed Damak, Fabrizio Frontalini, Boubaker Elleuch, Monem Kallel PII:
S1464-343X(18)30354-6
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.11.013
Reference:
AES 3368
To appear in:
Journal of African Earth Sciences
Received Date: 13 April 2018 Revised Date:
11 November 2018
Accepted Date: 13 November 2018
Please cite this article as: Damak, M., Frontalini, F., Elleuch, B., Kallel, M., Benthic foraminiferal assemblages as pollution proxies along the coastal fringe of the Monastir Bay (Tunisia), Journal of African Earth Sciences (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.11.013. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Benthic foraminiferal assemblages as pollution proxies along the coastal fringe of the
2
Monastir Bay (Tunisia)
3 4
Mohamed Damak1, 2*, Fabrizio Frontalini3, Boubaker Elleuch1, Monem Kallel1
5
1
6
Sfax, BP 1173, 3038 Sfax (Tunisia)
7
2
Association Notre Grand Bleu (NGO), Cap Marina, 5000 Monastir (Tunisia)
8
3
Dipartimento di Scienze Pure e Applicate, Università degli Studi di Urbino "Carlo Bo",
9
Campus Scientifico Enrico Mettei, 61029 Urbino (Italy)
RI PT
*
[email protected]
SC
10
Laboratoire de Génie de l’Environnement et Écotechnologie (GEET), ENIS, Université de
11
Abstract
13
The Monastir Bay is one of the most important resources of marine diversity in Tunisia. The
14
marine biodiversity quality of its coastal area has been however affected by several industrial,
15
fishing and fish-farming activities. A multidisciplinary characterization based on geochemical
16
analyses of sediment and benthic foraminifera was undertaken to evaluate the environmental
17
quality of marine sediments. The geochemical data combined with the statistical results
18
suggests an overall contamination of sediment mainly by Zn, Ni and Cu and the identification
19
of an area particularly polluted. This zone corresponds to the area in front of the Khniss drain
20
that has been historically affected by the presence of multiple sources of pollution. The site is
21
also characterized by a poorly diversified benthic foraminiferal assemblage, reflecting the
22
poor environmental conditions. Some species such as Quinqueloculina seminula and
23
Vertebralina striata appear to be positively related to EF and might be considered as tolerant
24
taxa to pollution in the Monastir Bay. The present study further reinforces the application of
25
benthic foraminifera as proxies of pollution and as bioindicators of the environmental quality
26
and represents among the first contributions in a Tunisian coastal marine area based on living
27
benthic foraminifera as bioindicators.
29
TE D
EP
AC C
28
M AN U
12
1. Introduction
30
Benthic foraminifera are unicellular organisms with a widespread distribution from marine
31
to transitional marine environments (Murray, 2006). Many benthic foraminiferal studies have
32
proven the considerable value of these protists as bioindicators and have therefore been
33
widely applied to biomonitoring (i.e., Alve, 1995; Armynot du Châtelet and Debenay, 2010;
34
Frontalini and Coccioni, 2011, for review). Because of their widespread distribution, short life 1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT and reproductive cycles, high biodiversity, great abundance, and specific ecological
36
requirements, benthic foraminifera have been successfully used as bioindicators in coastal
37
marine environments (Frontalini and Coccioni, 2008). In this context, benthic foraminifera
38
have been used as bioindicators in areas affected by natural and/or anthropic stress including
39
salinity and temperature fluctuations, high organic matter input, low oxygen availability as
40
well as organic and inorganic pollutants (Alve, 1995; Yanko et al., 1999). Benthic
41
foraminifera commonly respond to adverse environmental conditions by changing the
42
assemblages’ composition and parameters (i.e., Alve, 1995).
RI PT
35
Although benthic foraminifera have been widely applied to assess the environmental
44
quality in the Mediterranean Sea areas (i.e., Debenay, 2001; Frontalini and Coccioni, 2008;
45
Coccioni et al., 2009), only a few studies have been performed in Tunisian coastal areas,
46
namely in the Gabes Gulf (Aloulou et al., 2012; Ayedi et al., 2015), in the northern coast of
47
the Sfax city (Mkawar et al., 2007) and Bizerte (Martins et al., 2015, 2016) and Djerba
48
lagoons (El Kateb et al., 2018). Traditionally, the environmental quality of Tunisian coastal
49
areas has been mainly assessed by considering the physico-chemical characteristics, heavy
50
metal, organic matter and hydrocarbon contents in sediments. The Monastir Bay is situated on
51
the eastern coast of Tunisia and is one of the most important resources of marine resource and
52
biodiversity along the Tunisian coast. However, a significant increase in industrial, fishing
53
and fish farming activities has severely affected the environmental quality (i.e., Sassi et al.,
54
1998a,b; Nouira et al., 2013a,b; Challouf et al., 2017). Several environmental investigations
55
have been carried out to monitor the heavy metal (Sassi et al., 1998b), organic matter (Sassi et
56
al., 1998a), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs)
57
(Nouira et al., 2013a) as well as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (Nouira et al.,
58
2013b) along the Monastir coast.
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
43
This study, for the first time, aims to survey the environmental quality of marine surface
60
sediment of the Monastir Bay coast by conventional chemical analyses coupled with benthic
61
foraminiferal ones, also to determine the relationships among geo-chemical data and benthic
62
foraminiferal distributions.
AC C
59
63 64
2. Study area
65
The study area, which is the littoral of Monastir-Teboulba (Monastir Bay), lies on the
66
eastern shore of Tunisia. The Monastir Bay waters are characterized by a weak hydrodynamic
67
regime due to the sub-marine topography (i.e., 3 m isobaths at ~2 km from the coastline of
68
Khniss-Ksibet El Mediouni and at ~900 m from the coast of Lamta-Sayada) (Souissi et al., 2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2004). In fact, the bathymetry, in the Monastir Bay, is irregular and extends in the major part
70
of the bay as a shore-flat (Sassi et al., 1998a; Nouira et al., 2013b). The bay is delimited by
71
two sandy shoals (Ras Dimes sand spit in the South-East of the bay, and El Enf sand spit in
72
the North-West of the bay) this acts as physical barriers between the shore and the open sea
73
(Fig.1).The shoal of Teboulba isolates more or less the bay from the open sea. The coastal
74
fringe represents a receptacle of multiple wastewaters from the urban zone (five ports, two
75
wastewater treatment plants, and the Khniss drain) as well as from active fish farms within the
76
bay (Nouira et al., 2013a; Challouf et al., 2017). The drain of Khniss collects domestic and
77
industrial wastewaters from riverine discharges and is considered as the main source of
78
pollutants (Nouira et al., 2013a). These wastewaters are directly discharged in numerous
79
points along the coast (Sassi et al., 1998a; Nouira et al., 2013a).
SC
RI PT
69
The Monastir Bay is considered as a semi-enclosed lagoon (Nouira et al., 2013a; Challouf
81
et al., 2017) and as a consequence of the confined conditions, nutrient-rich wastewaters have
82
progressively promoted the eutrophication and the establishment of anoxic conditions in
83
surface sediments (Sassi et al., 1998b).
84
3. Materials and methods
86
3.1 Field Sampling
TE D
85
M AN U
80
Sampling sites are placed along the coastal fringe of the bay from Monastir city to
88
Bkalta city. In August 2015, superficial sediment samples were collected from 10 stations
89
(Fig.1), at a water depth not exceeding 0.5 m, using 1-m2 quadrat. Sampling sites were
90
selected from a presumed near and between the pollution sources and human activities. From
91
each sampling site, 50 cm3 surface sediments were collected (upper 1 cm) in 3 replicates for
92
foraminiferal analyses and were immediately treated with a Rose Bengal solution (2 g of Rose
93
Bengal in 1 L of ethanol). Additionally, ca. 2 kg of sediment and 500 ml sea water were
94
collected, immediately frozen on dry ice and transported in a dark container to the laboratory
95
for grain-size and geochemical and physico-chemical analyses, respectively.
97
AC C
96
EP
87
3.2 Physico-chemical analysis of water
98
The physico-chemical parameters of water such as conductivity, pH and total dissolved
99
solids (TDS) were measured in the laboratory. The pH was measured by pH meter (model:
100
WTW inoLab® pH 720) and conductivity by conduct meter (model: WTW inoLab® 7110).
101
The TDS were measured following the method of Rodier et al. (2009).
102 3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 103
3.3 Grain-size analysis Grain-size analyses were performed using AFNOR mesh-type sieves (Ayedi et al., 2015).
105
Briefly, before the analysis, about 100 g of sediments were digested with hydrogen peroxides
106
(H2O2) solution to remove organic matter content (Folk, 1974 ) and then dried in an oven at
107
40°C. The grain-size was then classed as very coarse sand (2 mm-1 mm), coarse sand (1 mm-
108
500 µm), medium sand (500 µm-250 µm), fine sand (250 µm-125 µm), very fine sand (125
109
µm-63 µm) and silt and clay (<63 µm) (USDA-NRCS, 2002).
110 111
3.4 Organic matter
RI PT
104
Approximately 1 g of <2 mm dried sediment was finely grounded with mortar and pestle
113
for total organic carbon (TOC) and total nitrogen (TN) analyses. The TOC analysis was
114
performed following the Walkley and Black methodology which involves the titration with
115
ferrous ammonium sulfate of the dichromate left after a wet oxidation of the samples with
116
potassium dichromate (Walkley and Black, 1933). On the other hand, Kjeldahl digestion is
117
used for TN determination, following MA.300-NTPT2.0. The total phosphorous (TP)
118
contents were analyzed as orthophosphate following the Murphy and Riley (1962)
119
spectrophotometric method, after samples digesting and transformation of phosphorylated
120
compounds into orthophosphate. The digested solutions are attacked by sulphonitric acid and
121
in the presence of ammonium molybdate forming a complex phosphomolybdic anion, which
122
after reaction with ascorbic acid gives a blue color. The optical density was measured by
123
colorimetry at 880 nm and expressed in mg/g.
TE D
M AN U
SC
112
125
EP
124
3.5. Trace metal analysis
Concentrations of selected trace metals were analyzed in the sediment fraction <63 µm,
127
after digestion, in three replicates to minimize error, in a sequence of heating steps using a
128
ratio of 10:5 ml nitric acids (HNO3, 65 %) and hydrochloric acids (HCl, 36 %), respectively.
129
Extracts were then rinsed with an additional 2 ml HNO3, diluted 50 times with deionized
130
water and filtered. The digested samples were aspirated for Fe, Cu, Zn, Cr, Ni and Pb
131
elements through atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS).The detection limits (in ppm) were
132
0.006 for Fe, 0.022 for Cu, 0.008 for Zn, 0.05 for Cr, 0.01 for Ni and 0.05 for Pb.
AC C
126
133
In order to evaluate the trace metal sediment contamination, several indices, namely
134
Enrichment Factor (EF), the Contamination Factor (CF) and the Pollution Load Index (PLI)
135
of Tomlinson et al. (1980) were calculated.
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 136
The EF is considered to compensate the differential variability of trace metals in sediment
137
from geogenic (crustal) and anthropogenic (on-crustal) (Feng et al., 2004). Iron has been used
138
as a reference element (Likuku et al., 2013; Schintu et al., 2016). The EFis calculated as: [
]
]
[
[
]
]
RI PT
=
[
where [Metal sample]/[Fe sample] is the ratio of concentration of metal element to iron in the
140
sediment sample and [Metal background]/[Fe background] is the same ratio with background
141
value of standard average Earth’s crust. Turekian and Wedepohl (1961) indicated the Earth
142
metal background values (ppm) as following: Cr: 35; Pb: 7; Zn: 16; Cd: 0.02; Fe: 9800; Cu: 2
143
and Ni: 2. The EF’s categories proposed by Sutherland et al. (2000) were considered (Table
144
1):
SC
139
M AN U
145 146
Following Likuku et al. (2013), the degree of sediment contamination by metals was also
147
evaluated as CF defined as: =
149
! "# ] -[
$ %&'()*+,]
The determination of CF is shown in Table 2.
TE D
148
[
150
The PLI compares the concentrations of elements in the environment with the ones expected
151
when excluding anthropogenic contributions and is calculated as ./0 = √ 7
1 3
2 3
3 3 …
153
The PLI was calculated to estimate the metal contamination status (Table 3).
155
AC C
154
EP
152
+ where “n” represents the number of metals studied and the CF is the contamination factor.
3.6 Foraminiferal analysis
156
Living benthic foraminifera fauna mirror present environmental conditions, whereas total
157
fauna (live and dead) provide information on a longer time-scale (Jorissen et al., 2018). For
158
this reason, and for the scope of this study, the environmental assessment was based only on
159
the living benthic foraminifera. Immediately after sampling, sediments were treated with a
160
Rose Bengal solution (2 g of Rose Bengal in 1 L of ethanol) to separate dead and living
161
foraminifera (Schönfeld et al., 2012). Sediments were carefully washed, in the laboratory,
162
through a set of sieves (63 µm, 125 µm and 500 µm) to remove coarse and mud fractions. 5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT From each sample and replicate, three hundred living specimens, where possible, were picked
164
from the 125 and 500 µm fraction. The taxonomic identification was based following
165
previous studies on benthic foraminiferal assemblages (i.e., Loeblich and Tappan, 1987;
166
Cimerman and Langer, 1991). Several foraminiferal parameters, namely species richness (S,
167
number of species per sample), the Fisher α index (Fisher et al. 1943), dominance (D), the
168
Shannon-Weaver index or information function (H) (Shannon and Weaver, 1963), evenness
169
(J); and equitability (E) were calculated using the PAST - PAlaeontologicalSTatistics data
170
analysis package (version 1.68, Hammer et al., 2001).
171
3.7 Statistical analysis
SC
172
RI PT
163
Prior to the statistical analysis the selected abiotic data including EFs, salinity, TN, TOC,
174
TP, pH and mud (<63 µm) were logarithmically transformed to remove the effects of orders
175
of magnitude difference between variables and normalize the data (Brakstad 1992; Manly,
176
1997). A Q-mode Cluster Analysis (CA) was applied to study the similarities between the
177
stations. The analysis was based on the Ward’s linkage method and the Euclidean distance.
178
Additionally, both a Q- and an R-mode Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were conducted
179
to reduce large data matrices composed of several variables to a small number of factors
180
representing the main modes of variation. In the PCA, it is also possible to compute additional
181
variables (relative abundance of benthic foraminiferal species>1% and diversity indices)
182
which do not contribute to the results thereof. The ordination (CA) and multivariate (PCA)
183
statistical techniques were performed using Statistica 7.0.
184
EP
TE D
M AN U
173
185
4. Results
186
4.1 Physico-chemical parameters of water, grain-size and organic matter The mean concentrations of physico-chemical parameters in water are summarized in
188
Table 4. The pH value in the study area varied between 6.72 and 8.21. The water salinity
189
ranged from 27.03 and 48.01. The lowest water salinity was recorded at BM1 station.
AC C
187
190
In the entire bay region, the sediment samples were dominated by medium to fine sand (48
191
- 86 %) with a very minor mud content (Table 4). However, mud (<63 µm) was observed on
192
both sides downstream of Khniss drain (BM1 and BM2), in downstream of Oued El Souk in
193
Lamta (BM5), and in rear port and in front of cornice conversion of Teboulba (BM7).
194
The TOC content varied between 0.5 % and 5.25 % (Table 4) with a relative higher values
195
in BM1, BM5 and BM7. The TN ranged between 0.33 % and 1.67 % (Table 4) whereas TP
196
from 0.02 to 0.344 mg/g (Table 4). 6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 197 198
4.2 Concentration and distribution of trace metals The concentrations of metals along the coastal fringe of the bay of Monastir are reported in
200
Table 4. The highest concentration of Cr, Ni, Cu, Pb and Zn were found in BM1, BM2 and
201
BM7 sites that are located between the mouth of Khniss drain (BM1 and BM2) and to the
202
West of port of Teboulba (BM7). The distribution pattern of EF exhibited a minimal to
203
moderate enrichment of Cr and Pb in all stations; a significant enrichment of Pb was only
204
observed in BM5. Moreover, moderate to significant enrichments of Zn have been
205
documented in the entire coastal fringe. However, a significant enrichment of Ni and Cu in
206
the entire coastal fringe of the bay and a very high enrichment of Cu were documented in
207
BM5 (Fig.2).
SC
RI PT
199
The results of CFs show a low contamination of Pb and Cr along the coastal fringe. On the
209
other hand, a moderate contamination with Zn element was identified in BM1, BM2, BM3
210
and BM7 and a moderate contamination of Ni in BM1, BM2, BM3, BM4, BM7 and BM9. A
211
considerable contamination of Cu was instead observed in BM1, BM2, BM3 and BM7
212
(Fig.3).
M AN U
208
In order to reduce the effects of peaks of individual elements, an assessment of sediment
214
quality was carried out using PLI (Fig.4). The overall contamination of sediment along the
215
coastal fringe, based on the PLI values indicates a deterioration of site quality of sediment in
216
BM1, BM2 and BM3. Furthermore, baseline levels of pollution are shown from BM5 to BM9
217
and BM0.
219
EP
218
TE D
213
4.3 Foraminiferal distribution
A total of 37 species were recognized in the living assemblages along the coastal fringe of
221
Monastir Bay. Twenty-eight species (7 hyaline, 18 porcelaneous and one agglutinated)
222
exceeded 1 % of the assemblage in one sample (Fig. 5). Living assemblages were largely
223
dominated by Ammonia tepida (7.84 % on average), Quinqueloculina seminula (33.45 % on
224
average), Peneroplis planatus (10.6 % on average), Vertebralina striata (13.2 % on average)
225
and subordinately by Ammonia parkinsoniana and Elphidium crispum.
AC C
220
226
Species richness (S) varied from 8 (BM2 station) to 26 (BM1 station). The highest density
227
was found in BM0 station (2362 specimens per 50 cm3). Whereas the diversity, using Fisher α
228
index, ranges from 1 (BM2 station) to 5 (BM1 station; Fig.6).
229 230
4.4 Statistics 7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 231
The Q-mode CA resulted in the grouping of samples into two main clusters (A and B)
232
according to the bottom water and sediment characteristics (Fig. 7). The Cluster B is
233
represented by four stations (BM1, BM2, BM5 and BM7) resulting in those with higher level
234
of pollutants. All the other stations are grouped in Cluster A (Fig. 7). The PCA shows that ~66.4 % of the data variance can be explained by the first two
236
principal components (factors). The sediment characteristics (< 63 µm, TN and TP) and
237
salinity are the predominant elements in the first component, while the contributions to the
238
second component are mainly due to EFs and pH (Fig. 8). By projecting onto the
239
environmental components, the plotted position of the benthic foraminiferal assemblages’
240
parameters (Fig.8a) and species (Fig. 8b) as secondary or additional variables, it appears that
241
most of these biotic variables are influenced by the sediments’ characteristics. In particular,
242
benthic foraminiferal diversity indices are negatively related to EFs, whereas FD is somewhat
243
positively related to the mud fraction, TP and TN (Fig. 8a). Additionally, most of the species
244
particularly E. crispum, Elphidium complanatum, Rosalina bradyi, Adelosina ciliarensis, and
245
Adelosina pulchella are negatively related to EFs, only Q. seminula and Vertebralina striata
246
appear somewhat positively related to EF. Elphidum advenum and A. tepida are negatively
247
related to the first component so to the salinity gradient but positively related to TN, TP, EF
248
of Cr and mud fraction.
250
SC
M AN U
The Q-mode PCA groups stations mainly follow their environmental conditions in approximately the same groups obtained with the Q-mode CA (Fig. 9).
251
5. Discussion
EP
252
TE D
249
RI PT
235
Geochemical and benthic foraminiferal data were compiled and integrated to characterize
254
the sediment quality in the coastal fringe of the Monastir Bay. The area has been deeply
255
shaped by coastal development and affected by different human activities including the
256
discharge of multiple effluent sources for several years that have severely promoted stressful
257
conditions in the marine ecosystem (Sassi et al., 1998a,b; Zaouali and Ben Charrada, 2010;
258
Nouira et al., 2013a,b). Monastir Bay is considered as one of the most important resources of
259
marine species diversity with a high extent of the seagrass meadows, Posidonia oceanica L.,
260
within the Tunisian territorial waters (El Asmi et al., 2003; Zaouali and Ben Charrada, 2010).
261
The water quality represents one of the most important factors in the aquatic ecosystem for
262
biotic proliferation and can be impacted by anthropogenic activities. The lowest water salinity
263
recorded in BM1 station is attributed to the proximity of the freshwater input through Khniss
264
drain. The artificial drain of Khniss is considered as one of the most important terrestrial
AC C
253
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT inputs of water in the region. In addition to fluvial waters, this drain collects domestic and
266
industrial wastewaters from riverine agglomerations (Nouira et al., 2013b). The Khniss drain
267
also plays an important role in the environmental setting evolution of the Monastir Bay
268
coastal fringe where its discharges effect the physic-chemical sediment parameters . In fact,
269
BM1 station recorded high values of organic matter parameters such as TN, TP and TOC. The
270
organic carbon, buried and preserved in marine sediments, depends on several factors such as
271
the rich contributions of terrestrial input that is commonly more refractory, sediment
272
metabolic activity (humification), bottom-water O2 concentration and sediment particles
273
(Canfield, 1994; Burdige, 2007). The highest TOC value (5.25 %) recorded in BM5 station
274
might be attributed to different factors such as the discharge of wastewaters through the
275
treatment plant of Lamta, the input from the Oued El Souk in Lamta, sub-marine topography
276
and a weak hydrodynamic regime. The combination of these natural and anthropogenic
277
factors promotes the eutrophication and the enrichment of the organic carbon. The TOC and
278
TN values recorded in the coastal fringe of the Monastir Bay, are relatively higher than those
279
measured by Ayadi et al. (2016) in the southern coast fringe of Gabes Gulf with TOC and TN
280
ranging between 1.95 and 2.7 % and between 0.029 and 0.058 %, respectively. However,
281
Sassi et al. (1998b) assumed that the organic matter level in this zone could be due not only to
282
the high algal proliferation, but also due to the domestic wastewater discharges or to the
283
aquaculture stations.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
265
According to Donnici et al. (2012), the high values of organic matter, which are
285
geochemical carriers of metals as a result of its adsorption capacity, might correspond to high
286
values of heavy metals. In order to assess the contamination and to compensate for
287
mineralogy and grain-size differences, heavy metals content in the sediment sample are
288
commonly normalized to Fe by calculating enrichment factors (EFs) (Donnici et al., 2012).
289
The EFs support the definition of the distribution of anthropogenic sediment pollution by
290
confirming the high values of trace element EF in the Monastir Bay with significant
291
enrichments in Ni (between 4 and 17) and Cu (between 4 and 27) in the entire coastal bay.
292
Except for Ni and Cu, these values are relatively higher than those measured in the northern
293
coast of Gabes Gulf by Aloulou et al. (2012) and in the south coast of Gabes Gulf (for Cu) by
294
Ayadi et al. (2016). In our study, Ni and Cu EFs did not show any direct correlation with
295
organic matter and muddy sediment. Additionally, to evaluate the sediment contamination
296
degree by trace element, a contamination factor (CF) was determined. The overall sediment
297
contamination in the studied sites, based on the CF values, indicated that sediments were
298
moderately contaminated (1≤CF<3) by Ni and a considerable contamination (3≤CF<6) by Cu
AC C
EP
284
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT was instead observed in BM1, BM2, BM3 and BM7. On the basis of the Pollution Load Index
300
(PLI) values, BM1, BM2 and BM3 site exhibited quality deterioration. In fact, BM1, BM2
301
and BM3 stations represent the coastline from Khniss to Ksibet El Mediouni. This
302
deterioration results from the discharge of Khniss drain, dumped treatment plant wastewaters
303
of El Frina, aquaculture station and drift movement caused by swells dominating sections
304
North-Northeast, Northeast and East-Northeast (Sassi and al., 1998b).
RI PT
299
The Q-mode CA statistical analyses showed two well-defined groups of samples according
306
to their pollution degree. Specifically, cluster B includes all the stations with higher content of
307
combined trace elements and organic matter, and can therefore be defined as the polluted
308
ones. This cluster group includes BM1, BM2, BM5 and BM7 stations, however, cluster A
309
includes all the remaining stations with relative lower level of pollutants than cluster B. The
310
sediment pollution of cluster B stations could be the result of the dumping in the sea of
311
treatment plant wastewaters that are enriched in organic matter and whose preservation is
312
enhanced by the weak hydrodynamic regime (Sassi et al, 1998b). Although cluster A includes
313
all stations that are relatively low or not polluted, it also encloses BM3 that exhibits a
314
moderate deterioration of sediment quality according to PLI value (1.40). This result may be
315
explained by the fact that Q-mode CA accounts for all physico-chemical parameters.
M AN U
SC
305
The sediment quality of the Monastir Bay was not only evaluated by geochemical analyses,
317
but also by checking the characteristics of benthic foraminiferal assemblages and their
318
parameters. Numerous foraminiferal studies have considered heavy metal, organic matter and
319
water salinity to be important factors affecting benthic foraminiferal distribution and
320
assemblage change and underlined the suitability of benthic foraminifera in environmental
321
biomonitoring (Coccioni et al., 2009; Donnici et al., 2012; Schintu et al., 2016). Benthic
322
foraminifera generally respond to adverse environmental conditions by mainly undergoing
323
local disappearance, assemblage changes both in composition and parameters (i.e., diversity
324
and density), dwarfism, and possibly the development of test abnormalities (e.g. Alve, 1995;
325
Yanko et al., 1994; Frontalini and Coccioni, 2008). Although benthic foraminifera have been
326
widely applied as proxy of pollution, some areas have been poorly explored. In fact, this study
327
represents, to our knowledge, among the first contributions on benthic foraminifera as
328
bioindicators in the Monastir Bay. Similarly, the Tunisian coast has generally been
329
understudied and the only few contributions, mostly from transitional environments, are from
330
Gabes Gulf (Aloulou et al., 2012; Ayadi et al., 2016), the northern coast of Sfax city (Mkawar
331
et al., 2007), the Bizerte (Martins et al., 2015, 2016) and Djerba (El Kateb et al., 2018)
332
lagoons.
AC C
EP
TE D
316
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT On the northern coast of Gabes Gulf from Sfax city to Skhira Gulf, Aloulou et al. (2012)
334
applied the benthic foraminiferal assemblages as proxies of pollution. A total of sixty-eight
335
benthic foraminiferal taxa were identified and statistically related to heavy metal EFs and
336
total hydrocarbons. Lower values of density and diversity, and an increase in values of the
337
opportunistic species A. tepida and Haynesina germanica were associated with contaminated
338
sediments. Ayadi et al. (2016) documented the distribution of benthic foraminifera and the
339
sediment quality along the coastline of Skhira and Gabes (southern coast of Gabes Gulf). A
340
barren zone corresponding to the most polluted area and increasing values of diversity away
341
from this area were reported and some tolerant and sensitive species were identified.
342
Unfortunately, both these two papers due to the low number of living specimens consider the
343
total assemblages (living + dead) and represent the only ones, to our knowledge, in Tunisian
344
coastal environments.
SC
RI PT
333
A total of 37 species were recognized in the living assemblages along the coastal fringe of
346
Monastir Bay. This diversity value is comparable to the one documented in the southern coast
347
of Gabes Gulf (34 taxa) (Ayadi et al., 2016), but lower than those found in the northern part
348
of the same Gulf (68 taxa) (Aloulou et al., 2012). In the Monastir Bay coastal fringe, the
349
living foraminiferal density varied from 44 to 2362 reaching a maximum value at BM0
350
station. Low foraminiferal density, diversity and specific richness were recognized (BM2,
351
BM5 and BM7 stations) which belong to cluster B of Q-mode CA that are also characterized
352
by the highest pollution level. A PCA ordination diagram confirms these results. In fact,
353
benthic foraminiferal diversity indices are negatively related to EFs, and specifically to EFs
354
of Zn, Cu, Pb and Ni. Foraminiferal density also seems to be positively related to the mud
355
fraction, TP and TN. Similar results showing a diversity and density decrease were also found
356
in some areas receiving high heavy metal concentration such as El Mex bay, Egypt (Samir
357
and El-Din, 2001), the southern coast of Gabes Gulf, Tunisia (Ayadi et al., 2016) and the port
358
of Cagliari, Sardinia (Schintu et al., 2016). According to Coccioni et al. (2009), decreasing
359
diversity indices and species richness are expected in areas particularly affected by pollution.
360
In addition, benthic foraminifera might positively benefit from the organic matter input that
361
represent a source of nutrients and this might be the case of the positive relation between FD
362
and the mud fraction, TP and TN. Accordingly, Murray (1973) and Debenay et al. (1996)
363
have reported that an increase in pollution might lead to the presence of high individual
364
numbers belonging to a few opportunistic species. Numerous studies have focused on the
365
relationship between grain size and benthic foraminifera (i.e., Debenay et al., 1996; Samir and
366
El-Din, 2001). A positive correlation between muddy sediment and foraminiferal density
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
345
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 367
(Fig.8a) was also observed in the present studied area. Armynot du Châtelet et al. (2009)
368
explained this positive relation by the reduced nutrients’ availability in coarse sediments that
369
are also in agreement with the results of Alve and Murray (1999), Samir and El-Din (2001)
370
and Aloulou et al. (2012). This study also displays the wide distribution of Q. seminula along the coastal fringe of
372
Monastir Bay. Quinqueloculina seminula has been reported as a dominant species in the
373
Mediterranean lagoons, continental shelves and marshes (Murray, 2006; Langlet et al., 2014).
374
Moreover, this species has been inferred to be tolerant of low levels of oxygen and periods of
375
anoxia (Bernhard and Gupta, 1999; Martins et al., 2011; Martins et al., 2013; Langlet et al.,
376
2014). This study documents high percentages of Q. seminula at stations of cluster A of the
377
Q-mode CA, with a positive relationship with metals enrichment (Fig. 8, b). Most of
378
porcelaneous taxa are reported to be stress-sensitive to pollution but not Q. seminula (Barras
379
et al., 2014). Following the PCA plot, Q. seminula seems to be negatively affected by EFs of
380
several heavy metals and the total hydrocarbon in the northern coast of Gabes Gulf (Aloulou
381
et al., 2012). Vertebralina striata is the dominant species in the Monastir Bay and positively
382
related to anthropogenic environmental stress, which correlates positively with the majority of
383
heavy metals EFs. The dominance of A. tepida in our study might be linked to its tolerance to
384
relatively low salinity conditions and to pollution. In fact, A. tepida has been shown to be
385
tolerant of chemical pollution, hydrocarbons, fertilizing products, low salinity, and a high
386
concentration of trace elements (Coccioni et al., 2009; Frontalini et al., 2013). This taxon is
387
commonly encountered in transitional environments under stress (Yanko et al., 1994, 1999;
388
Alve, 1995; Debenay et al., 2001; Armynot du Châtelet et al., 2004; Frontalini et al., 2014;
389
Martins et al., 2014) and is frequently considered as a species tolerant to stress. According to
390
that, A. tepida is the dominant species at BM1 station, where high concentrations of organic
391
matter, heavy metals, and low water salinity values were recorded. Furthermore, A. tepida
392
was also positively correlated with mud fraction, TP, TN and EF.Cr. Ammonia tepida was
393
considered as a bioindicator of pollution in sediments from the Naples harbor (Ferraro et al.,
394
2006), in Augusta Harbor (Romano et al., 2009), along the coastal area of the Adriatic Sea
395
(Frontalini and Coccioni, 2008) as well as in different Tunisian environments such as the
396
lagoon of Bizerte (Martins et al., 2015, 2016), Gulf of Gabes (Aloulou et al., 2012). Ammonia
397
tepida and Q. seminula are considered to be quite tolerant of environmental stress (Debenay
398
et al., 2000; Debenay and Guillou, 2002), and these two species have been regarded as the
399
primary pioneers in several transitional environments (Debenay et al., 2009). On the other
400
hand, Ammonia parkinsoniana appears to be the species most affected by heavy metals and
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
371
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT organic matter, as revealed by the negative relation in the PCA plot (Fig. 8b). This taxon is
402
typical of coastal shallow environments and has been reported to prefer relatively clean
403
environments (Seiglie, 1975; Frontalini and Coccioni, 2008). Additionally, most of the
404
species and in particular E. crispum, E. complanatum, R. bradyi, A. ciliarensis, and A.
405
pulchella are negatively related to EFs indicating that they are, at least in this area, sensitive
406
taxa.
RI PT
401
407 408
Conclusion
The present work contributes to the evaluation of the environmental quality of the coastal
410
fringe of Monastir Bay by using an integrated approach based on geochemical analyses of
411
sediment and benthic foraminifera living therein. The geochemical data combined with
412
statistical results suggest an overall contamination of sediment mainly by Zn, Ni and Cu and
413
the identification of an area particularly impacted by metals. This zone corresponds to the area
414
in front of the Khniss drain that has been historically affected by the presence of multiple
415
sources of pollution. The site is also characterized by a poorly diversified benthic
416
foraminiferal assemblages that would reflect the poor environmental conditions. Some species
417
such as Ammonia tepida, Elphidium crispum, Elphidium complanatum, Rosalina bradyi,
418
Adelosina ciliarensis, and Adelosina pulchella are negatively related to EFs and can be
419
inferred as very sensitive taxa. On the other hand, Quinqueloculina seminula and Vertebralina
420
striata appear to be positively related to EF and might be considered as tolerant taxa to
421
pollution in the Monastir Bay. The present study further reinforces the application of benthic
422
foraminifera as proxies of pollution and as bioindicators of the environmental quality and
423
represents the first contribution on a coastal marine area based on living benthic foraminifera
424
as bioindicators.
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
425
SC
409
426
Acknowledgements
427
The authors are very grateful to the Editor-in-Chief Dr. Damien Delvaux, Ph.D and two
428
anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and valuable comments that have greatly improved
429
the paper. This work was conducted as part of the project financed by Critical Ecosystem
430
Partnership Fund (CEPF) under the direction of “Notre Grand Bleu” association. The authors
431
would like to thank Dr Manel Ben Ismail (Director of Notre Grand Bleu and Doctor in
432
Biological Sciences and Biotechnology) and Dr Leïla Chaari for their encouragement,
433
technical support and assistance in the field and laboratory.
434 13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT References
436
Aloulou, F., Elleuch B., Kallel M., 2012. Benthic foraminiferal assemblages as pollution proxies in the northern
437
coast of Gabes Gulf, Tunisia. Environ Monit Assess 84,777–795.
438
Alve, E., 1995. Benthic foraminiferal responses to estuarine pollution: a review. J For Res 25, 190-203.
439
Alve, E., Murray, J.W., 1999. Marginal marine environments of the Skagerrak and Kattegat: a baseline study of
440
living (stained) benthic foraminiferal ecology. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 146, 4171-
441
4193
442
Armynot Du Châtelet, E., Debenay, J-P., 2010. The anthropogenic impact on the western French coasts as
443
revealed by foraminifera : a review. Revue de Micropaleontologie 53, 129-137.
444
Armynot Du Châteleta, E., Debenaya, J-P., Soulard, R., 2004. Foraminiferal proxies for pollution monitoring in
445
moderately polluted harbors. Environmental Pollution 127, 27-40.
446
Ayadi, N. Zghal, I. Aloulou, F. & Bouzid, J., 2016. Impacts of pollutants on the distribution of recnt benthic
447
foraminifera: the southern coast of Gulf of Gabes, Tunisia. Environmental science and pollution research 23,
448
6414-6429.
449
Barras, C., Jorissen, F.J., Labrune, C., Andral, B., Boissery, P., 2014. Live benthic foraminiferal faunas from the
450
French Mediterranean Coast: Towards a new biotic index of environmental quality. Ecological Indicators 36,
451
719–743.
452
Bernhard, J-M, Sen Gupta, B-K., 1999. Foraminifera of oxygen–depleted environments. In B. K. Sen Gupta
453
(Ed.), Modern Foraminifera, Kluwer Academic Publishers. 201–216.
454
Brakstad, F., 1992. A comprehensive pollution survey of polychlorinated dibenzopdioxins and dibenzofurans by
455
means of principal component analysis and partial least squares regression. Chemosphere 25. 1611–1629.
456
Burdige, D-J., 2007. Preservation of Organic Matter in Marine Sediments: Controls, Mechanisms, and an
457
Imbalance in Sediment Organic Carbon Budgets? Chem Rev. 467-485.
458
Canfield, D-E., 1994. Factors influencing organic carbon preservation in marine sediments. Chem Geol. 315-
459
329.
460
Challouf, R., Hamza, A., Mahfoudhi, M., Ghozzi K., Bradai M-N., 2017. Environmental assessment of the
461
impact of cage fish farming on water quality and phytoplankton status in Monastir Bay (eastern coast of Tunisia)
462
Aquacult Int 25, 2275-2292.
463
Cimerman, F., Langer, M-R., 1991. Mediterranean foraminifera.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
435
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Coccioni, R., Frontalini, F., Marsili, A., Mana, D., 2009. Benthic foraminifera and trace element distribution: A
465
case-study from the heavily polluted lagoon of Venice (Italy). Marine Pollution Bulletin 59. 257–267.
466
Debenay, J.-P., Della Patrona, L., Goguenheim, H., 2009. Colonization of coastal environments by Foraminifera:
467
Insight from shrimp ponds of New Caledonia (SW Pacific). Journal of Foraminiferal Research 39, 249-266.
468
Debenay, J.-P., Guillou, J.-J., Redois, F., and Geslin, E., 2000. Distribution trends of foraminiferal assemblages
469
in paralic environments: a base for using foraminifera as bioindicators. Environmental Micropaleontology, 39-
470
67.
471
Debenay, J.-P., Tsakiridis, E., Soulard, R., and Grossel, H., 2001. Factors determining the distribution of
472
foraminiferal assemblages in Port Joinville Harbor (Ile d’Yeu, France): the influence of pollution, Mar.
473
Micropaleontol. 43, 75–118.
474
Debenay, J-P., Della Patrona, L., Goguenheim, H., 2009. Colonization of coastal environments by foraminifera:
475
in sight from shrimp ponds in New Caledonia(SW Pacific). J. Foramin. Res. 39, 249–266.
476
Debenay, J-P., Guillou, J-J., 2002. Ecological transitions indicated by foraminiferal assemblages in paralic
477
environments. Estuaries 25, 1107-1120.
478
Debenay, J-P., Pawlowski, J., Decrouez, D., 1996. Les foraminifères actuels, Masson, Paris Milan Barcelone, 1-
479
230.
480
Donnici, S., Serandrei-Barbero, R., Bonardi, M., Sperle, M., 2012. Benthic foraminifera as proxies of pollution:
481
The case of Guanabara bay (Brazil). Marine Pollution Bulletin 64, 2015-2028.
482
El Asmi-Djellouli, Z., Djellouli, A., Pergent-Martini, CH, Pergent, G., Abdeljaoued, S., El Abed, A., 2003.
483
Interactions entre l’herbier à Posidonia oceanica et l’hydrodynamisme au sein de la baie de Monastir (Tunisie
484
orientale). Actes 2 symposium méditerranéen sur la végétation marine, Athènes, 12-13 décembre 2003, UNEP,
485
MAP, RAC/SPA, Simpact ed, Tunis, 93-99.
486
El Kateb, A., Claudio Stalder, C., Neururer, C., Fentimen R., Spangenberg, J.E., Spezzaferri S., 2018.
487
Distribution of benthic foraminiferal assemblages in the transitional environment of the Djerba lagoon (Tunisia).
488
Swiss Journal of Geosciences, 1-18.
489
Feng, H., Han, X., Zhang, W. & Yu, L., 2004. A preliminary study of heavy metal contamination in yangtze
490
river intertidal zone due to urbanization. Marine pollution Bullentin 49, 910-915.
491
Ferraro, L., Sprovieri, M., Alberico, I., Lirer F., Prevedello, L., Marsella, E., 2006. Benthic foraminifera and
492
heavy metals distribution: a case study from the Naples Harbour (Tyrrhenian Sea, Southern Italy). Environ
493
Pollut 142. 274–87.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
464
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Fisher, R-A., Corbet, A-S., Williams, C-B., 1943. The Relation Between the Number of Species and the Number
495
of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population. Journal of Animal Ecology 12, 42-58.
496
Folk R-L., 1974. Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Hemphill, austin.
497
Frontalini, F., Buosi, C., Da Pelo, S., Coccioni, R., Cherchi, A., Bucci, C., 2009. Benthic foraminifera as bio-
498
indicators of trace element pollution in the heavily contaminated Santa Gilla lagoon (Cagliari, Italy). Mar Pollut
499
Bull. 58, 858-877
500
Frontalini, F., Coccioni, R., 2008. Benthic foraminifera for heavy metal pollution monitoring: A case study from
501
the central Adriatic Sea coast of Italy. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 76. 404-417.
502
Frontalini, F., Coccioni, R., 2011. Benthic foraminifera as bioindicators of pollution: a review of Italian research
503
over the last three decades. Revue de Micropaléontologie 54, 2, 115–127.
504
Frontalini, F., Margaritelli, G., Francescangeli, F., Rettori ,R., Armynot du Châtelet E., Coccioni R., 2013.
505
Benthic Foraminiferal Assemblages and Biotopes in a Coastal Lake: The Case Study of Lake Varano (Southern
506
Italy). Acta Protozool. 52: 147–160.
507
Frontalini, F., Semprucci, F., Armynot du Châtelet, E., Francescangeli, F., Margaritelli, G., Rettori, R., Spagnoli,
508
F., Balsamo, M., Coccioni, R., 2014. Biodiversity trends of the meiofauna and foraminifera assemblages of Lake
509
Varano (southern Italy). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 127, 7-22.
510
Hammer, O., David A.T. Harper, D.A.T., Ryan P.D., 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package
511
for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4, 1-9.
512
Jorissen, F., Nardelli, M. P., Almogi-Labin, A., Barras, C., Bergamin, L., Bicchi, E., El Kateb, A., Ferraro, L.,
513
McGann, M., Morigi, C., Romano, E., Sabbatini, A., Schweizer, M., Spezzaferri, S., 2018. Developing Foram-
514
AMBI for biomonitoring in the Mediterranean: Species assignments to ecological categories. Marine
515
Micropaleontology 140, 33-45.
516
Langlet, D., Baal, C., Geslin, E., Metzger, E., Zuschin, M., Riedel, B., Risgaard-Petersen, N., Stachowitsch, M.,
517
Jorissen, F.J., 2014. Foraminiferal species responses to in situ, experimentally induced anoxia in the Adriatic
518
Sea. Biogeosciences, 11, 1775–1797.
519
Likuku A.S., Mmolawa K.B., Gaboutloeloe G.K., 2013. Assessment of Heavy Metal Enrichment and Degree of
520
Contamination Around the Copper-Nickel Mine in the Selebi Phikwe Region, Eastern Botswana. Environment
521
and Ecology Research 1(2), 32-40.
522
Loeblich, A.R., Tappan, H., 1987. Foraminiferal genera and their classifica tion. Van Nostrant Reinhold, New
523
York.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
494
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT MA.300-NTPT2.0, 2014. Détermnation de l’azote total Kjeldahl et du phophore total: digestion acide-méthode
525
colorimètrique automatisée. Centre d’expertise en analyse environnemental du Québec. 1-16.
526
Manly B-F-J., 1997. Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman and Hall, New York.
527
Martins M-V., Helali M-A., Zaaboub N., Boukef-Benomrane I., Frontalini F., Reis D., Portela H., Clemente I-
528
M., Nogueira L., Pereira E., Miranda P., El Bour, M., Aleya, L., 2016. Organic matter quantity and quality,
529
metals availability and foraminiferal assemblages as environmental proxy applied to the Bizerte Lagoon
530
(Tunisia). Mar Pollut Bull.,161-179.
531
Martins, M.V., Zaaboub, N., Aleya L., Frontalini, F., Pereira, E., Miranda, P., Mane, M., Rocha, F., Laut, M., El
532
Bour, M., 2015. Environmental Quality Assessment of Bizerte Lagoon (Tunisia) Using Living Foraminifera
533
Assemblages and a Multiproxy Approach. PLoS One. 2015; 10(9): e0137250.
534
Martins, V., Yamashita, C., Sousa, S.H.M., Martins, P., Laut L.L.M., Figueira R.C.L., Mahiques M-M., Ferreira
535
Da Silva, E., Alveirinho Dias, J-M., Rocha, F., 2011. The response of benthic foraminifera to pollution and
536
environmental stress in Ria de Aveiro (N Portugal). Journal of Iberian Geology 37 (2), 231-246.
537
Martins, V.A., Frontalini, F., Tramonte, K.M., Figueira, R.C., Miranda, P., Sequeira, C., Fernández-Fernández,
538
S., Dias, J.A., Yamashita, C., Renó, R., Laut, L.L., Silva, F.S., Rodrigues, M.A., Bernardes, C., Nagai, R., Sousa,
539
S.H., Mahiques, M., Rubio, B., Bernabeu, A., Rey, D., Rocha, F., 2013. Assessment of the health quality of Ria
540
de Aveiro (Portugal): heavy metals and benthic foraminifera. Mar Pollut Bull. 70, 18-33.
541
Martins, V.A, Frontalini, F., Rodrigues, M.A., Dias, J.M.A., Laut, L.L.M., Silva, F.S., Clemente, I.M.M.M.,
542
Reno, R., Moreno, J., Sousa, S.M.S., Zaaboub, N., El Bour, M., and Rocha, F., 2014. Foraminiferal Biotopes and
543
their Distribution Control in Ria de Aveiro (Portugal): a multiproxy approach. Environmental Monitoring and
544
Assessment 186, 8875–8897. doi:10.1007/s10661-014-4052-7
545
Mkawar, S., Azri, CH., Kamoun, F., Montacer, M., 2007. Biologic impact of the anthropic effluents (particularly
546
heavy metals) rejected on the Northern coast of Sfax city (Tunisia). TSM 10, 71-85.
547
Murphy, J., Riley, J-P., 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate solution in
548
natural waters. Analytic chimica acta 27. Department of oceanography, the university, Liverpool (Great Britain)
549
31-37.
550
Murray, J.W., 1973. Distribution and Ecology of Living Benthic Foraminiferids. Heinemann, London.
551
Murray, J.W., 2006. Ecology and Applications of Benthic Foraminifera. Cambridge University Press, New
552
York.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
524
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Nouira, T., Risso, C., Lassaad C., Budzinski, H., Boussetta, H., 2013,a. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and
554
Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) in surface sediments from Monastir Bay (Tunisia, Central
555
Mediterranean): Occurrence, distribution and seasonal variations. Chemosphere 93, 487-493.
556
Nouira, T., Tagorti, M.A., Budzinski, H., Etchebert, H., Boussetta, H., 2013,b. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
557
(PAHs) in surface sediments of Monastir Bay (Tunisia, Central Mediterranean): distribution, origin and seasonal
558
variations. Intern. J. Environ. Anal. Chem 96, 1470-1483.
559
Rodier, J., Legube, B., Merlet N., Coll., 2009. L’analyse de l’eau. Dunod, Paris.
560
Romano, E., Bergamin, L., Magno M.C., Ausili A., 2009. Sediment characterization of the highly impacted
561
Augusta harbour (Sicily, Italy): modern benthic foraminifera in relation to grain-size and sediment geochemistry.
562
Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts 15, 930-946.
563
Samir, A.M., El-Din, A.B., 2001. Benthic foraminiferal assemblages and morphological abnormalities as
564
pollution proxies in two Egyptian bays. Marine Micropaleontology 41, 193-227.
565
Sassi, R., Souissi, F., Soussi, N., Baccar, F., Added, A., Charef, A., Abdejaoued, S., 1998b. Diagnostic
566
environnemental du nord de la baie de Monastir (Tunisie orientale) par l’étude géochimique des sédiments
567
superficiels. Bulletin des laboratoires des ponts et chassées-218. REF. 4215, 49-58.
568
Sassi, R., Souissi, F., Soussi, N., Boukaaba, M. & Belayouni, H., 1998a. Organic matter geochemisty to analyse
569
the degradation of the Monastir-Ksibet El Mediouni littoral (Eastern Tunisia). Earth & planetary Sciences 327,
570
303-308.
571
Schintu, M., Marrucci, A., Marras, B., Galgani, F., Buosi, C, Ibba, A., Cherchi, A., 2016. Heavy metal
572
accumulation in surface sediments at the port of Cagliari (Sardinia, western Mediterranean): Environmental
573
assessment using sequential extractions and benthic foraminifera. Marine Pollution Bulletin 111, 45-56.
574
Schönfeld, J., Alve, E., Geslin, E., Jorissen, F., Korsun, S., Spezzaferri, S., 2012. The FOBIMO (FOraminiferal
575
BIo-MOnitoring) initiative—Towards a standardised protocol for soft-bottom benthic foraminiferal monitoring
576
studies. Marine Micropaleontology 94–95, 1–13.
577
Seiglie, G.A., 1975. Foraminifers of Guayanilla Bay and their use as environmental indicators. Rev. Esp.
578
Micropaleontol. 7, 453-487
579
Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W., 1963. Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press,
580
Urbana, 144.
581
Souissi, R., Turki, I., Souissi F., 2014. Effect of submarine morphology on environment quality: case on
582
Monastir Bay (eastern Tunisia) Carpathian journal of earth and environmental science, V.9. 231-239.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
553
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Sutherland, R.A., Tolosa, C.A., Tack, F.M.G., Verloo, M.G., 2000. Characterization of Selected Element
584
Concentrations and Enrichment Ratios in Background and Anthropogenically Impacted Roadside Areas. Arch.
585
Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 38, 428–438.
586
Tomlinson, D.L., Wilson, J.G., Harris, C.R., Jeffrey, D.W., 1980. Problems in the assessment of heavy-metal
587
levels in estuaries and the formation of a pollution index. Helgoländer Meeresunters. 33, 566-575.
588
Turekian, K.K., Wedepohl, K.H., 1961. Distribution of the elements in some major units of the earth's crust.
589
Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 72 (2), 175–192.
590
USDA-NRCS, 2002. Field book for description and sampling soils. National soil survey center natural sources
591
conservations service U.S. department of agriculture, 1-228.
592
Walkley, A., Black, I.A., 1933. An examination of degtjareff method of determination soil organic matter and a
593
proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Rothamsted experimental station, England. 29-38.
594
Yanko, V., Ahmad, M., Kaminski, M., 1999. Morphological deformities of benthic foraminiferal tests in
595
response to pollution by heavy metals: implications for pollution monitoring. Journal of Foraminiferal Research,
596
28. 177–200.
597
Yanko, V., Kronfeld, J., Flexer, A., 1994. Foraminifera as Environmental Condition Indicators in Todos os
598
Santos Bay (Bahia, Brazil). Journal of Foraminiferal Research. 24. 1-17.
599
Zaouali, J., Ben Charradar, 2010. Impact des actions anthropiques sur le phytobenthos de la baie de monastir.
600
Proceedings of the 4th mediterranean symposium on marine vegetation. UNEP, MAP, RAC/SPA. 135-140.
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP AC C
601
RI PT
583
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figures and Table captions
603
Figure 1. Geographical map of the study areas and sampling stations (BM).
604
Figure 2. Trace metal enrichment factors distribution in coastal fringe of the Bay of Monastir.
605
Figure 3. Contamination factor distribution in the coastal fringe of the Bay of Monastir.
606
Figure 4. PLI values in the coastal fringe of the Bay of Monastir.
607
Figure 5. Relative abundance (%) of benthic foraminiferal taxa in coastal fringe of the Bay of Monastir.
608
Figure 6. Distribution of foraminiferal parameters in the study area (a: foraminiferal density, b: Species richness,
609
c: Dominance, d: Shannon-Weaver, e: Evenness, f: Fisher α, j: Equitability).
610
Figure 7. Sampling stations plotted on Q-mode CA.
611
Figure 8. R-mode PCA ordination diagram of samples based on the environmental components and benthic
612
foraminiferal assemblages’ parameters (a) and species (b).
613
Figure 9. Q-mode PCA ordination of stations with cluster as defined by Q-mode CA.
614
Table 1.Enrichment factors for metals and terminologies (Sutherland et al.,2000).
615
Table 2. Contamination factors (Likuku et al., 2013).
616
Table 3. Pollution Load Index description (Tomlinson et al., 1980).
617
Table 4: Sediment and water parameters.
SC
M AN U
AC C
EP
TE D
618
RI PT
602
20
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
619 620
Fig. 1: Geographical map of the study areas and sampling stations (BM).
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
621
21
Fig. 2: Trace metal enrichment factors distribution in coastal fringe of the bay of Monastir.
SC
622 623
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
624
22
625 626
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fig. 3 : Contamination factor distribution in the coastal fringe of the bay of Monastir.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
627
23
628 629
Fig. 4: PLI values in the coastal fringe of the bay of Monastir.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
630
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
24
631 632
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fig. 5: Relative abundance (%) of benthic foraminiferal taxa in coastal fringe of the bay of Monastir.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
633
25
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
M AN U
SC
634
AC C
EP
636
TE D
635
637 638
Fig. 6: Distribution of foraminiferal parameters in the study area (a: foraminiferal density, b: Species richness, c:
639
Dominance, d: Shannon-Weaver, e: Evenness, f: Fisher α, j: Equitability).
26
Fig. 7: Sampling stations plotted on Q-mode CA.
SC
640 641
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
642
27
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fig. 8: PCA ordination diagram of samples based on the environmental components and benthic foraminiferal
645
assemblages’ parameters (a) and species (b).
AC C
EP
TE D
646
M AN U
643 644
28
Fig. 9: Dendrogram classification of stations produced by Q-mode.
SC
647 648
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
649
29
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT EF Terminologies
EF < 2
Minimal enrichment
2 ≤ EF <5
Moderate enrichment
5 ≤ EF <20
Significant enrichment
20 ≤ EF <40
Very high enrichment
EF ≥ 40
Extremely high enrichment
Table 1: Enrichment factors for metals and terminologies (Sutherland et al., 2000).
RI PT
650
EF Classes
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
651
30
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT CF Classes
652
CF Terminologies
CF < 1
Low contamination
1 ≤ CF <3
Moderate contamination
3 ≤ CF <6
Considerable contamination
CF ≥ 6
Very high contamination
Table 2: Contamination factors (Likuku et al., 2013).
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
653
31
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
654
PLI
Description
<1
No pollution
1
Baseline levels of pollution
>1
Deterioration of site quality
Table 3: Pollution Load Index description (Tomlinson et al., 1980).
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
655
32
BM0
BM1
BM2
BM3
BM4
BM5
BM6
BM7
BM8
BM9
pH
7.37
7.56
7.68
7.74
6.72
7.37
7.53
7.47
8.21
8.04
Conductivity (ms/cm)
56.9
36.8
59.7
59.1
57
58
57.8
59.6
57.1
60.7
Salinity (mg/l)
44.06
27.03
44.81
46
44.37
45.14
44.96
46.45
44.13
48.01
Very coarse sand
1
2.78
12.00
0.24
0.42
0.43
1.11
0.44
0.31
1.00
Coarse sand
0.9
15.27
7.93
3.06
6.37
11.18
2.52
10.21
2.77
1.61
2.3
20.06
20.11
27.67
50.51
41.32
39.92
39.48
22.15
3.85
75.80
28.64
38.29
50.63
32.03
33.44
46.17
31.65
55.05
57.66
Very fine sand
19.4
30.23
19.91
17.79
10.22
12.72
9.84
16.60
18.63
35.81
Silt and clay
0.2
2.83
1.55
0.51
TN (%)
0.36
1.67
1.43
1.40
TOC (%)
0.5
3.75
2.5
2.75
TP (mg/g)
0.15
0.34
0.04
0.02
Cr (ppm)
0.54
13.96
12.00
0.00
Ni (ppm)
1.93
4.95
4.13
Fe (ppm)
2347.28
4147.76
3566.32
Cu (ppm)
2.11
8.23
7.08
Pb (ppm)
3.41
7.86
6.76
Zn (ppm)
13.12
46.16
39.69
PLI
0.36
1.67
1.43
Table 4: Sediment and water parameters.
M AN U
0.88
0.31
1.48
0.66
0.18
0.33
0.59
0.60
0.78
0.63
0.59
2.67
5.25
2.25
4.75
1.75
1.75
0.07
0.13
0.09
0.16
0.07
0.07
1.08
0.00
0.00
1.58
0.00
1.98
4.12
2.52
1.33
1.14
2.61
1.49
3.33
3948.37
760.44
385.55
845.05
2421.91
1036.03
1875.59
7.06
1.45
2.10
1.75
9.71
1.80
3.28
3.30
1.80
1.96
2.20
6.35
2.51
5.21
25.10
8.32
6.08
8.00
18.07
6.47
9.96
1.40
0.33
0.59
0.60
0.78
0.63
0.59
TE D
0.37
EP
Fine sand
%
AC C
Medium sand
SC
Stations
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
33
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
1
34
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights:
2
Monastir Bay is one of the most important resources of marine species in Tunisia.
3
Trace metals pollution has detrimental effects on benthic foraminifera assemblages.
4
Geochemical and foraminiferal analyses reveal deteriorated conditions.
5
Foraminiferal taxa have the potential to be used as trace metals bioindicators.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
1