seminars in THE NEUROSCIENCES, Vo13, 1991 : pp 191-203
Benzodiazepine
receptors:
new vistas *
Grayson Richards, Peter Schoch and Willy Haefely behaviour. The hopes raised by several second generation anxiolytic drugs depend upon clinical proof of this partial agonist concept. Recent research has provided evidence for a structural diversity of GABA* receptors, the targets for benzodiazepine receptor ligands in the CNS (see Tobin, this issue’). Since the composition and stoichiometry of the native receptor(s) are not yet known, the physiological role and the pharmacological implications of such a diversity (polymorphism) remain a matter of speculation. It is conceivable, however, that the pharmacological profiles of some partial agonists might be due to their interaction with target neurons differing not only in their receptor reserves but also their GABAA receptor variants. Here we describe: the role of GABA in the mechanism of benzodiazepine action; the identification of benzodiazepine receptors; the molecular neuroanatomy of GABA* receptors; the spectrum of benzodiazepine receptor ligands; and partial agonists
The therapeutic #e&s of benzodiazepinesare triggered by their interaction with allosteric sites (benzodiazepine recognition sites) on GABA* receptors in the CNS in a way that facilitates GABA- mediated inhibitory neurotransmission. The discovery of a spectrum of ligandr interacting with differing efficacies at benzodiazepine receptors, as well as the growing evidencefor a diversity of GABA* receptors, has created new opportunities for producing benzodiazepine receptor ligands with potentials un&e and evenunexpectedtherapeuticprojles. Key words: GABA receptors I receptor diversity I allosteric sites /partial agonists I intrinsic efficacy
BENZODIAZEPINES (prototype: diazepam) are widely prescribed anxiolytics, antiepileptics and hypnotics, the success of this class of therapeutic drugs being undoubtedly due to not only their efficacy and rapid onset of action but also to their extremely high safety. Research on their mechanism of action in the CNS has revealed a facilitatory effect on inhibitory neurotransmission mediated by the amino acid GABA (y-aminobutyric acid), This facilitation is achieved by the positive allosteric modulation of GABA* receptors, which regulate the chloride conductance of the subsynaptic membrane in target neurons through a convertible ion channel (Figure 1). The modulatory site, the benzodiazepine receptor, is in fact recognized by a spectrum of structurally different ligands (benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepines) with differing allosteric modulatory activities, from full agonists (positive modulators) through antagonists to inverse agonists (negative modulators). Partial agonists acting at the benzodiazepine receptor are novel potential therapeutic agents (as efficacious anxiolytics and antiepileptics) because of their greatly reduced sedative and muscle relaxant activity and reduced liability to induce tolerance, physical dependence and drug-seeking
- -Figure 1. Simplified schematic view of a GABAergic synapse consisting of a nerve terminal with vesicular stores of GABA (0) and the subsynaptic membrane with GABA, receptors. The latter are depicted as pentameric structures (isofonns of cr, p, y subunits) of as yet unknown subunit composition and stoichiometry, which are thought to allow the conductance of chloride ions through the GABA-gated ion channel. A separate site binds benzodiazepines, which modify the action of GABA on the ion channel.
From the Pharma Division-Preclinical Research, F HojinannLa Roche Ltd, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland *Dedicated to Dr Lowell 0. Randall on the occasion of his 80th birthday 01991 by W. B. Saunders Company 1044-5765/91/0303-0003$5.00/0
191
G. Richards et al
1 92 versus full agonists as novel potential therapeutic agents . We conclude with a discussion on future perspectives including unexpected potential therapeutic indications .
Role of GABA in the mechanism of benzodiazepine action
ci
0 triazolam Halcion®
o
effects of benzodiazepines is such that they are now the best understood of the major neuropsychotropic drugs, creating a more rational basis for improve-
Oi
ments in their therapeutic profiles . GABA is the most abundant and functionally most important inhibitory neurotransmitter in the
zopiclone Imo vane ®
mammalian CNS . Two distinct classes of receptors for GABA exist : GABAA and GABAB receptors, characterized by their affinity for specific agonists and antagonists, the effector systems to which they
alprazolam Xanax ® ci
After little more than 15 years of intense research on the role of GABA in the mechanism of action of benzodiazepines (reviewed in ref 2), our knowledge of the molecular events underlying the therapeutic
ci
O
diazepam Valium®
0 N
~-N
zolpiderb W Stilno
Figure 2 . Benzodiazepine receptor ligands of different chemical classes : diazepam, triazolam, alprazolam (1, 4-benzodiazepines), zopiclone (cyclopyrrolone), zolpidem (imidazopyridine) . All compounds are full agonists .
are coupled and the presence or not of allosteric modulatory sites . Whereas GABA A receptors 3 are convertible ion channels regulating the chloride
main reasons for the extremely high safety of these drugs .
conductance of the subsynaptic membrane, GABA B receptors 4 are coupled to GTP-binding protein(s) regulating adenylate cyclase, as well as calcium and potassium channels . Although GABA is the natural
The first clue of the mechanism by which benzodiazepines produce their effects was provided by the observation that diazepam enhanced segmental dorsal root potentials (for review, ref 2) . The relevance of
agonist for both receptors, there exist selective agonists and antagonists : e .g . muscimol and bicuculline for GABAA receptors and baclofen and phaclofen for GABAB receptors (see articles by Macdonald and Twyman, Johnston, and Bowery and Maguire, this
these findings became clear when this so-called presynaptic inhibition was shown to be only one of many GABA-mediated responses which are potentiated by diazepam . Subsequent electrophysiological, biochemical and behavioural studies have led
issues -7 ) . Allosteric sites on neuronal GABAA receptors are the targets through which benzodiazepines (and non-benzodiazepines) (Figure 2) modulate
to the currently held belief that benzodiazepines act as positive allosteric modulators to enhance submaximal GABAergic synaptic transmission . 2 The benzodiazepines have been shown, electrophysio-
GABAA receptor function ; other allosteric sites include those for barbiturates, convulsants (such as picrotoxin, TBPS), and general anaesthetics8 (such as halothane, propofol, steroids and perhaps ethanol) (Figure 3) (see Ticku, this issue9) . A unique feature of the allosteric site to which
logically, to have GABA-potentiating properties in various parts of the mammalian CNS, where they modulate the effectiveness of either GABAergic principal output neurons, e .g . cerebellar Purkinje cells and neurons of the GABAergic pallido- and striato-nigral pathways, or GABAergic intrinsic cells, i .e . interneurons such as those mediating presynaptic inhibition in the spinal cord and dorsal column nuclei, cerebellar Golgi, basket and stellate cells, hippocampal basket cells and intrinsic neurons of the cerebral cortex . Potentiation of exogenous GABA
benzodiazepines bind is its ability to mediate opposite pharmacological effects by facilitating or impeding GABA receptor function, depending on the type of receptor ligand (see below) . These modulatory effects are of limited maximal intensity, i .e . the maximum response to the physiological transmitter GABA is not exceeded . This property is probably one of the
(or a GABA mimetic, such as isoguvacine) in cultured neurons or in slice preparations in vitro
Bentodiazepine
receptors: new vistas
193
GABAsite GABA muscimol isoguvacine ;rgyl$
Barbiturate site barbiturates etomidate etazolate
Benzodiazepine site
agonists antagonists 3 inverse agonists membrane
benzodiazepines non-benzodiazepines
General , anesthetics
Subsynaptic
propofol steroids halothane ethanol
Picrotoxinin site bicyclophosphates TBPS tetrazoles
3. Functional binding sites on ion channel GABA* receptors. Binding sites for the natural transmitter GABA and its agonists and antagonists, as well as allosteric drug recognition sites for a variety of ligands, are depicted schematically.
Figure
is routinely used for electrophysiological gations10-i2 of the GABA-potentiating benzodiazepines.
The identification receptors
investieffects of
of benzodiazepine
Although the molecular target mediating the pharmacological effects of benzodiazepines was first described in 1977, the term benzodiazepine receptor was already used in 197 1 to indicate specific drug recognition sites through which benzodiazepine responses were triggered (reviewed in ref 3). With the knowledge of the essential role of GABA in the mechanism of action of benzodiazepines, we prepared 3H-diazepam of high specific activity with the aim of visualizing, radioautographically, the benzodiazepine bound to its presumed receptor in GABAergic synapses in the CNS. Our attempt failed because of the rapid diffusion of the ligand in the standard tissue preparation in use at the time. (Procedures developed by other research groups have since overcome these initial diffculties.r3) In the meantime, as a result of discussions with Dr R.F. Squires we decided to study 3H-diazepam binding to brain homogenates and in 1977 investigations performed independently in Copenhagen,i4
New Y ork15 and Roche, Baseli6 revealed the presence of specific high-affinity and saturable binding sites for 3H-diazepam in brain membranes. The binding sites were restricted to grey matter and the B,, for various brain regions differed markedly. Although most of the criteria for identifying these drug recognition sites with pharmacological receptors (reviewed in ref 2) could be satisfied at that time (high affinity, saturable, pharmacologically specific, interaction with GABA, restricted to CNS, phylogenetic and ontogenetic development, correlation between receptor occupancy and pharmacological effects, distribution in CNS regions with high densities of GABAA receptors), definite proof was provided only by the discoveryi7,18 of pharmacologically inert ligands that competitively blocked the effects of benzodiazepines by occluding these binding sites. The benzodiazepine receptor is now known to be recognized by not only benzodiazepines but also drugs of other chemical classes, ligands displaying differences in both affinity and intrinsic efficacy (see below: Spectrum of benzodiazepine receptor ligands). Although diazepam and related benzodiazepines (probably of dietary origin or from gut flora) have been measured in rat and human brains (using antibodies to benzodiazepines as well as mass spectroscopic and radiometric techniques), it remains to be demonstrated whether benzodiazepine receptors are
194 primarily the molecular targets for endogenous neurotransmitter modulators or for xenobiotic ligands (for reviews, refs 2,19). Regions of the mammalian CNS highly innervated by GABAergic neurons contain a high density of GABA* receptors and its associated binding sites for various allosteric modulators including benzodiazepines (Figures 4-6). Quantitative receptor radioautography (for reviews, refs 20,21) has revealed the distribution and abundance of selective binding sites for the following components of the receptor complex: high-affinity GABAA receptors
G. Richards
revealed by “H-muscimol (a GABAA receptor agonist); low affinity GABAA receptors revealed by 3H-bicuculline and 3H-SR 95531 (GABAA receptor ;22 high-affinity benzodiazepine receptors antagonists) revealed by 3H-flunitrazepam, 3H-clonazepam, 3Hflumazenil and 3H-Ro 15-45 13 (benzodiazepine agonists, antagonist and partial inverse agonist, respectively);13~20~23 and high-affinity binding sites thought to be located on or close to the pore of the GABA* receptor channel complex revealed by 3H-TBPS (t-butyl-bicyclophosphorothionate, a cage convulsant).24 According to Olsen et ~1,~~the differential capacity of various regions of the receptor channel complex to bind the above radioligands (see also ref 25) indicates the existence of at least four subtypes of receptors. Monoclonal antibodies to the GABA* receptor crl-subunit and fi2-, /33-subunits have been used to reveal the regional, cellular and subcellular localization of the receptors in the mammalian CNS.26-28 Receptors are not confined to synapses but have also been found in extrasynaptic membranes. In vivo binding investigations with “H-flumazenil (reviewed in ref 20) have demonstrated the feasibility of non-invasive computer tomographic (PET and SPECT) analyses of human brain using l ‘C-flumazenil and 1231-Ro 16-0154 (an iodinated derivative of flumazenil) 2g for studying receptor changes (as cause or effect) in neurological disorders such as chronic anxiety, epilepsies and Huntington’s chorea.
Molecular receptors
Figures 4-6. Radioautographic distribution of benzodiazepine receptors (Figures 4,5) and high-affinity binding sites for the GABA, receptor-associated chloride ionophore (Figure 6) in parasagittal sections of rat (Figures 4, 6) and mouse (Figure 5) brain: White areas indicate the brain regions with an abundance of receptors revealed by [ 3H] flumazenil binding in vitro (Figure 4) and in vivo (Figure 5) and 35S-TBPS binding in vitro (Figure 6). Calibration bars = 2 mm.
et al
neuroanatomy
of GABA*
GABA* receptors belong to the superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels30 and assemble from several homologous subunits to form a GABA-gated, chloride-conducting pore, a convertible ion channel. The receptor is an integral part of one or several subunits of a transmembrane hetero-oligomeric glycoprotein complex (see Tobin, this issue’). Biochemical investigations (for reviews, refs 3,31,32), that is, photoaffinity labelling with [ 3H] flunitrazepam and [ 3H ] Ro 15-4513, affinity purification and immunoprecipitation studies, initially suggested that the GABAA receptor consists of CY-and p-subunits with molecular sizes of 50 kDa and 55 kDa. Molecular size determination of the intact receptor suggested that it is composed of four subunits although, to ac%ommodate an estimated open pore diameter of 5.6 A, a pentamerit structure was proposed. The high-affinity
195
Benzodiazepine receptors . new vistas
binding sites for GABA and benzodiazepines were originally considered to be located on the ß- and a-subunits respectively . More recent evidence (reviewed in ref 33), however, indicates the presence of GABA and benzodiazepine binding sites on both subunits or on the interfaces between them . Whereas benzodiazepine tranquilizers increase the current flowing through activated GABA A receptor channels, presumably by increasing the frequency of opening, barbiturates (via different allosteric sites) do so by increasing the channel open time (for review, ref 34 ; see also Macdonald and Twyman, this issue5) . It has been postulated that the receptor fright spontaneously oscillate between states with high and low affinity for GABA . Agonists and inverse agonists at the benzodiazepine receptor could then stabilize the receptor in the high- and lowaffinity conformation, respectively, i .e . they might shift the conformational equilibrium to the respective affinity state through their selective affinity for either the high- or low-affinity states . Competitive antagonists might not be able to distinguish between the two conformation states but would prevent access of either positive or negative allosteric modulators . Partial agonists, on the other hand, would produce a shift of the equilibrium between low and high affinity GABA A receptor states that is less marked than full agonists because they are less able to distinguish the two conformations . Molecular cloning studies 30,35-41 (reviewed in refs 33,42,43) have now revealed the primary structures of the subunits proposed to constitute the supramolecular complex of the GABAA receptor channel. As detailed in the article by Tobin (this issuer), cloning has revealed four subunits, a, ß, y and 6 with less than 50% sequence homology, and variants thereof with >,70% identity, al-6, ß1-3, yl,2 and 6 . Electrophysiological studies on oocytes injected with subunit-specific mRNAs 44 or on transiently transfected mammalian cells expressing simultaneously various subunit combinations have revealed that receptors composed of a and ß subunits form GABA-gated chloride channels which can be blocked by bicuculline and picrotoxin, and facilitated by barbiturates (see articles by Macdonald and Twyman ; Johnston, and Ticku, this issue 5,6'9) . For consistent positive or negative allosteric modulation by benzodiazepines, however, a -y subunit is also required, although the type of a-subunit influences not only the sensitivity of the receptor to GABA but also the affinity of different ligands for the benzodiazepine recognition site . 35-39,45 Four classes of
receptors have been proposed : I, alßy2 (high affinity for zolpidem) ; II, a2(3)ßy2 (intermediate affinity for zolpidem) ; III, a5ßy2 (extremely low affinity for zolpidem) ; IV, a6ßy2 (low affinity for 1,4benzodiazepine agonists but high affinity for Ro 15-4513, an inverse agonist) . N .B . 0 follows the nomenclature of Pritchett and Seeburg ;37 the same sequence was published earlier and called a4 by Khrestchatisky et al. 33 Whereas the antagonist flumazenil has a high affinity for receptor classes IIII, it has only a moderate to low affinity for class IV . The type of -y-subunit, on the other hand, strongly influences the affinities for antagonists and inverse agonists . 39 The variety of neuronal responses to GABA resulting from this receptor diversity increases plasticity (see ref 46) . Using polyclonal antibodies to al- and -y2-specific synthetic peptides, it has been recently demonstrated 47 that these two subunit isoforms are integral components of the GABAA receptor and that the al subunit has the allosteric benzodiazepine binding site which can be photolabelled . The y2 subunit probably induces a conformational change in the receptor complex, favoring the binding of benzodiazepines to the a subunit . These findings explain different but interrelated roles of these subunits in receptor modulation by benzodiazepines . Distribution of GABAA receptor subunit isoforms Despite rapid advances in our knowledge of the structural diversity of subunit components of the GABAA receptor, its native composition and stoichiometry are not yet known . The prerequisites for identifying the composition of native receptors include the evidence for : (i) the cellular co-localization of subunit isoforms from in situ hybridization histochemistry (mRNA) and immunohistochemistry (protein) ; (ii) the unique physiology and pharmacology of co-localized subunits in injected oocytes and transfected cells, also in native receptors of the identified CNS regions by single-channel recordings on brain slices from pertinent regions ; and (iii) the presence of individual subunits in isolated receptor preparations demonstrated by antibodies using e .g. sequential immunoprecipitation assays (see ref 42) . As antibodies to oligopeptides specific for subunit isomers have not been used extensively for immunohistochemistry, most of the available information on the co-localization of receptor subunits has come from in situ hybridization histochemistry (Figure 7) .
196
G. Richards
et al
Figure 7. Radioautographic distribution of GABA, receptor mRNA in a parasagittal section of rat brain. White areas indicate the brain regions with an abundance of mRNA revealed bv in silu hvbridization with 35S-labelled synthetic oligonucleotide specific for the o 1-subunit. Calibration bar = 2 mm. These studies33,40,48-54 have revealed that in rat brain crl , fl2 and y2 subunits are the most ubiquitously distributed and abundant of those investigated to date (Persohn et al, in preparation). They co-localize in several regions (olfactory bulb mitral cells, cerebral cortex layers II-VI, pallidum, hippocampal formation, thalamus, substantia nigra reticular, colliculi, cerebellar Purkinje and granule cells, deep cerebellar and brainstem nucleiinterpositus, vestibular, facial, motor trigeminal). Other subunit mRNAs, in contrast, have a more restricted and unique distribution-olfactory bulb granule cells: 63 > (r2 > (~3, ~5, ~2, 6; caudate putamen: p3> >(r2, 72, 6>(r3, fil, 02; hippocampus: a3 poorly expressed, (r6 and 6 absent; septum, hypothalamus and medial amygdala: yl; dentate gyrus: (r3 poorly expressed, (r6 absent; thalamus: a2, ~5, ~6, 03 absent; substantia nigra compacta: (r3; cerebellar Bergmann glia: CY~,01, yl ; cerebellar Golgi cells: (r3; deep cerebellar and brainstem nuclei: (x5, a6, 01 and 6 absent. Lastly, of all the subunit isoforms studied to date (r6 is the most restricted (to cerebellar granule cells). We also found evidence for receptor diversity in the spinal cord,50 where the subunit isoforms a2, /33 and y2 co-localize in motor neurons of Rexed layer IX whereas in the spinal ganglia the expression of various subunit mRNAs provides further evidence for the axo-axonal inhibition of primary sensory afferents by GABAA receptors.
Spectrum
of benzodiazepine
receptor
ligands
The interaction between benzodiazepine receptor ligands and their allosteric sites on the GABA*
receptor complex (Figure 8) is determined by two intrinsic properties of the ligand: its binding affinity and its intrinsic efficacy; full agonists have a positive intrinsic efficacy and inverse agonists a negative intrinsic efficacy (for reviews, refs 2,55). Between these two extremes are competitive antagonists whose intrinsic efIicacies are zero, i.e. they are unable to activate the receptor to which they bind. The modulation of GABA responses by benzodiazepine receptor ligands can be easily quantified by measuring GABA-stimulated chloride flux, which is the primary effect of GABA receptor activation. Figure 9 illustrates the concentration-response curve for GABA and how it is shifted along the abscissa under the influence of an agonist (diazepam), antagonist (flumazenil) and inverse agonist (the fl-carboline DMCM) of the benzodiazepine receptor. In correspondence to the pharmacological profile, diazepam potentiates GABA whereas DMCM reduces its apparent potency. Flumazenil as an antagonist has no measurable intrinsic efficacy in this test. If an agonist or inverse agonist has a low capacity to activate the receptor (positively or negatively) it is described as a partial agonist or a partial inverse agonist. Comparing different benzodiazepine receptor ligands with varying pharmacological profiles including agonists, inverse agonists and antagonists in the chloride flux assay shows that indeed there exists a continuous spectrum of intrinsic efficacies in modulating GABA responses. Strong convulsants, e.g. DMCM, inhibit and strong central depressants, e.g. diazepam, potentiate the GABA response. In between are the partial (inverse) agonists with reduced and antagonists with zero intrinsic efficacy (Figure 10).
Benzodiazepine
receptors: new vistas
197 Partial Agonists
Agonists
Partial Inverse Agonists
Antagonists
inverse Agonista
+
Figure 8. A simplified schematic view of the three basic types of ligand-receptor interactions and their different modes of coupling to the GABA, receptor. Whereas agonists reduce the levels of anxiety, muscle tension, convulsions, vigilance and memory, inverse agonists have diametrically opposite effects. Competitive antagonists, while having no intrinsic activity per se, prevent or abolish the effects of agonists and inverse agonists by excluding access to the benzodiazepine receptor. 500-
+ 1 uM
400-
DIAZEPAM
300-
+l uhi I
lE-0b
FLUMAZENIL ,
I
IE-05
lE-04
GABA
concentration
(M)
Figure 9. GABA-stimulated 36chloride flux in a membrane preparation from rat cerebral cortex. Before the stimulation of chloride flux by GABA (duration 3 s at 30 “C) and filtration, the membranes were preincubated for 10 min in the presence of the benzodiazepine receptor ligands at the receptor saturating concentration of 1 FM. The typical modulation of the GABA-response by the benzodiazepine receptor agonist diazepam and inverse agonist DMCM are shown by the lower part of the curves. The intersection of the curves at higher GABA concentrations is probably due to different desensitization kinetics of the GABA response in the presence of the respective ligands. Discussion of this effect is beyond the scope of this review.
Ligands with differing intrinsic efficacies (Figure 11) produce different maximal pharmacological effects in neuronal populations which differ in receptor density or efficiency of signal transduction. The fractional receptor occupancies required for the same intensity of pharmacological effect is usually much higher for partial agonists than for full agonists. With full agonists a maximal pharmacological response is frequently obtained well before all receptors are activated. For such ligands the target cells are said to have a functional receptor reserve. When partial agonists interact with the receptor, only a small proportion of the ligand-receptor complexes results in receptor activation. Consequently, partial agonists require a higher fractional receptor occupancy than full agonists for an effect of identical intensity so that in target cells with little or no functional receptor reserve, a maximal effect may not be achieved even at receptor saturation (Table 1).
Full
agonists:
ideal
clinical
profile?
Benzodiazepines are the most widely used drugs for the treatment of acute and chronic anxiety, for sleep disturbances, conscious sedation, induction and potentiation of anaesthesia, for muscle spasticity and
198
G . Richards et al modulation of GABA-stimulated chloride flux (in %) +40-
+20-
0
-20E
a
IL
-40-
â
é â u E E
0
E U U
w u u
a 0
t h
t
n I,
s
N 0
s
•
n
•z W
aE
•
JIL
•
•
•
•
•
••
•
••
W N
•
•
F H
a 0
s
•
•
aC J LL
Figure 10 . The comparison of benzodiazepine receptor ligands with differing pharmacological profiles reveals a continuous spectrum of intrinsic efficacies with regard to their modulation of GABA-induced chloride fluxes in a membrane preparation from rat cerebral cortex . Agonists enhance whereas inverse agonists reduce GABA-response (positive and negative modulation of the GABA receptor) . Full agonists show maximal, antagonists show zero intrinsic efficacy . The intrinsic efficacies of partial agonists lie between those of full agonists and antagonists .
seizures . One would think that this broad therapeutic spectrum, coupled with the potency and acknowledged safety of these drugs would not require improvement
indications . Of potential therapeutic interest are competitive antagonists (prototype ; flumazenil) and partial inverse agonists (prototype : sarmazenil) . 55
but it is now widely accepted that the ideal clinical profile of second generation drugs should include several characteristics that are lacking in currently marketed compounds .
Pure competitive antagonists have no intrinsic activity
Although as anxiolytics, benzodiazepines have good efficacy, rapid onset of action and undisputed safety, there is a need for drugs with less sedation and
experiments and clinical studies, the competitive antagonist flumazenil (Anexate ® , the imidazobenzodiazepinone Ro 15-1788) has been shownl 7 to
dependence potential as well as less interaction with ethanol . The ideal profile of future anxiolytics should include : good efficacy and anxioselectivity ; rapid onset and long duration of action ; excellent tolerability ; minimal physical dependence, abuse liability, ethanol interaction and muscle relaxation ; and no or only
antagonize the behavioural, neurological and physiological effects of benzodiazepine receptor ligands . It is currently used in several clinical indications, for example in intensive care medicine, in anaesthesiology (for general anaesthesia, dentistry and bronchial
mild sedative effect . Anti-epileptic benzodiazepines produce sedation and tolerance, and have a restricted efficacy in treating partial complex seizures . A longacting drug is required that is effective in treating all forms of epilepsies without developing tolerance . A second generation benzodiazepine hypnotic should be one lacking hangover effects, tolerance liability, ethanol interaction, behavioural disinhibition, amnesia and dependence and abuse potential . These ideal profiles could be satisfied by benzodiazepine receptor ligands acting as partial agonists (see below) . Receptor ligands with different pharmacological profiles might be envisaged for other therapeutic
but nevertheless have extremely useful pharmacological properties as antidotes to benzodiazepine receptor ligands in cases of overdose . In both animal
endoscopy) together with midazolam, 56 and in mixed intoxications involving benzodiazepine receptor ligands where it has diagnostic utility in coma of unknown etiology . Recent preclinical and clinical findings indicate a potential therapeutic use of flumazenil also for hepatic encephalopathy 57 and for re-setting the receptor in cases of benzodiazepine tolerance . 58 The partial inverse agonist sarmazenil (for review, ref 55), the imidazobenzodiazepinone derivative Ro 15-3505, is a congener of flumazenil and a potent antagonist of classical benzodiazepine tranquilizers, with a very low inverse (negative) intrinsic efficacy at the benzodiazepine receptor . The compound has
199
Benzodiazepine receptors : new vistas
1
0
convulsions, from its stimulation of brain EEG activity and from its consistent cognition-improving effects in several behavioural paradigms . Compounds like sarmazeni1 59,60 could have therapeutic value for
H O2N Br O
iinda,olum
clonazepam
the treatment of symptoms associated with decreased vigilance and cognitive performance, such as age-
brelazenIl Ro 16-6028
Rlvotrll ®
associated memory disturbances, dementia, hepatic encephalopathy and narcolepsy .
I'-, d
ci
N
Partial agonists as potential N
therapeutic agents alpidem Ananxll
IC 8205
Second generation anxiolytics and anti-epileptics
divaplon RU 32698
acting through benzodiazepine receptors should not have several features currently considered to be unwanted side effects of full benzodiazepine
o
N
receptor agonists (see refs 61,62, for example) . These include depression of alertness and cognitive functions, muscle relaxation and lack of coordination, tolerance
cl o
abecarnd ZK 112 119
sarmamnll Ro 15-3505
(e .g . to the antiepileptic activity), behavioural disinhibition, interaction with ethanol, and liability to physical dependence . It is conceivable that future
O
o' t N O
N H
O
Re 15 4513
DMCM
Ro 19-4603
Figure 11 . Benzodiazepine receptor ligands of different intrinsic activities : midazolam is a full agonist (positive allosteric modulator) ; bretazenil, abecarnil, alpidem, RU 32698 and FG 8205 are partial agonists (weak positive allosteric modulators) ; clonazepam is a partial agonist with a relatively high intrinsic efficacy ; flumazenil is a competitive antagonist (virtually no intrinsic efficacy) ; sarmazenil, Ro 15-4513 and Ro 19-4603 are partial inverse agonists (weak negative allosteric modulators) ; DMCM is an inverse agonist (negative allosteric modulator) . a mild central stimulant activity, as is evident from its facilitation of chemically and physically induced
anxiolytics, antiepileptics and hypnotics, without the aforementioned characteristics, could be designed using the most rational exploitation of the present knowledge of the benzodiazepine receptor as the modulatory component of the GABAA receptor complex . The separation of their desirable and undesirable effects can be probably achieved by using the partial agonist concept, 55 for example to produce compounds which are anxiolytic and antiepileptic but with markedly reduced sedative and muscle relaxant effects and reduced liability to induce tolerance, physical dependence and drug-seeking behaviour (Figure 12) . 62-67 Different neuronal systems that are preferentially involved in the various effects of benzodiazepines vary in their GABAA receptor density and reserve .
Table 1 . Fractional receptor occupancies (in %) of diazepam and bretazenil at equieffective doses for different pharmacological effects in mice
Diazepam Bretazenil
Protection from audiogenic seizures in DBA/2J mice
Anticonflict activity in the Geller-Seifter test
Protection from pentetrazoleinduced convulsions
Impaired motor performance in the rotating rod test
15 65
30 95
40 100
50 inactive
The fractional receptor occupancies were measured by an in vivo competition assay using intravenous 3 H-flumazenil as radioligand . The doses of the test compounds corresponded to the oral ED 50 with the exception of the anticonflict test where the minimal effective dose was given ."
200
G.
open field
o
rat
ataxia
rat
ataxia
dog
sedation
monkey
locomotor activity ataxia
o
rat cat
0
maximal electroshock conflict
rat
∎/
PTZ seizures
rat
conflict
Neurons mediating anticonvulsant and antianxiety effects seem to have the highest receptor reserve whereas a smaller reserve or lack of it is characteristic of neurons involved, e .g . in arousal control . Bretazenil (Ro 16-6028), as a partial agonist, should be able sufficiently to enhance GABA activity in the former systems to reach the same maximal CNS depression as full agonists but would be insufficient in the latter systems . Preclinical studies with bretazenil (for review, ref 55) have compared its pharmacological properties with those of the full agonist diazepam . Bretazenil has approximately a 10-times higher affinity for the benzodiazepine receptor than diazepam and produces anticonflict effects at much lower doses and over a much wider dose range . The following observations identify bretazenil as a benzodiazepine receptor partial agonist : it has a smaller, regionally-specific GABAshift profile in sections of rat brain and cat spinal cord in vitro (Figure 13) ; its fractional receptor
I F-1> 300 H > 50
Continuous monkey avoidance horizontal wire rat
∎
rat
o
/ o
monkey r 0,01
r 01 .
i 1
t 100
r 10
r 1000
Dose (mg kg - ', orally)
Figure 12 . Profiles of activity of the full agonist diazepam (o) and the partial agonist bretazenil (u) in a range of behavioural and functional tests . Values are ED50 values or minimal effective doses (anticonflict activity) . PTZ, pentetrazole (leptazol) . DIAZEPAM 13
CLONAZEPAM 26.2 46
39
accumbens nucleus .. . . ... . ... . . ... . . ... . .. . . ... . . .. . . ... . . .. . .. .. . ... . . ... . ... . . . . . . ventral pallidum ... . .... . .... . ... . .... . .. . . ... . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . ... . ... . . ... ... islands of Calleja . . . ... . ... . . ... . .... . . . ... . . .. . . . .. . . ... . . .. . . . . . . ... . . .. olf. bulb (plex layer) . . . . ... . ... . . ... . ... . . ... . ... . . .. . . ... . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . ... . . .. . . ... . 1- •- 1 hippocompus (oriens layer) .. . ... . . ... . .... . ... . . ... . .. . . ... . . .. . . ... . . .. . . . .. . . ... . ... . . .. . . ... . . ... . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . ... . . .. . . .. 1- • dentate gyrus (mol . layer) . ... . .... . .. . . ... . ... . . .. . . ... . . . . . ... . . .. . . . .. . .... . ... . t- •-1 thalamus (ant dors n.) ... . 1- • subst niggra reticulata .. . .... . ... . . ... . .... ... . . ... . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . sup. coll. (superf. grey)
t .3
-//4 592
. . ... . . ... . ... . .... . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . ... . . .. . ... . . ... . ... frontal cortex
0.6
2 .5 6
4 .0 _
•-4
1
410-/N
•
F•-
6.4
1-•
/H 5.1
F-- •--//i
52
•I
1- • . . ... . .... .
,
FM 1-- •
I•- •
-a _
. . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . ..~ . .. . ... • cerebellum (mol. layer) -• Brain Region 04
1 .0
1-•-1
I -. -1
inferior colliculus
1-•
BRETAZENIL 3.9
2 .6 46
F- •-1
_ . . ... ........ ..... . .. . ... . . ... ... . . ... ... ... .. .....~ . . . . .•. . . .
cerebellum (gran. layer) ..
Richards et al
.
0.8 1 .0
2 I
3 I
4.U 1
0 .6 081 .0
2
3
4 .0
accumbens nucleus . . . . .. . .... . ... . . ... . .... . ... . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . ... . . .. . . .. . . ... . . . . . ... . . ... . .. . . . . ... . ... . . ... . . ... .... . .... . ... . .... . .... .... . .. . . ventral pallidum : islands of Callejo ... . . ... . ... . . ... . ... . . .. . ... . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. ... . . ... . ... . . ... . .. . . .. . . . off. bulb (piex. layer) . . ... . . ... . ... . . ... . .... . .. . . ... . . .. . . . .. . . .. . . ... . ... . . ... . ... . . ... . .. . . . . . . . hippocampus (ariens layer) . . . .. . . ... . .... . ... . .... . ... . ... . . .. . . ... . . .. . . . .. . . ... . . .. . .... . dentate gyrus (mol. layer) . . . .. . ... . . ... . .... . ... . . ... . ... . . .. . . ... . . .. . . ... . . .. . .. .. ... . . thalamus (ant dors n .) . . . ... . .... . ... . . ... . .. . . . .. . . ... . ... . . ... . . .. . . .. . ... . . ... . ... . . ... . .... subst. reticulate . . . ... nigra . .... .... . .. . . . .. . . ... . . .. . . ... . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . ... . . . sup. coll. (superf grey) .. . . ... . ... . ... . . ... . .... . .. . . . .. . . .. . . ... . . .. . . . .. . ... . . ... . . inferior colliculus . .. . .. .. . . .. . . ... . .... . ... . .... . .. . . . . . . . ... . . .. . . cerebellum (mol. layer) . . . . .. . .... . .... . ... . ... . . ... . .... ... . . .. . . .. . . ... . . ... . . .. . ... . . ... . .... . cerebellum (gran. layer) . . . .. . . ... . . .. . . . .. . . .. .
Figure 13 . IC 50 profiles and GABA-shift profiles of diazepam, clonazepam and bretazenil in rat brain . IC 50 values (in nM, •) with 95% confidence limits do not differ dramatically from one brain region to another for all three compounds . GABA-shift profiles (thick bold bars, highly significant) differ markedly, reflecting the rank order of intrinsic efficacies (diazepam > clonazepam > bretazenil) . GABA-shift index = IC 50 - GABA/IC550 + GABA .
201
Benzodiazepine receptors : new vistas
Figure 14 . Modulation of GABA-stimulated 36chloride flux in a membrane preparation from rat cerebral cortex by a benzodiazepine receptor full agonist (diazepam), partial agonist (bretazenil) and full inverse agonist (DMCM) . GABA was added at the half-maximally effective concentration of 10µM . Bretazenil, a prototype partial agonist, exerts a positive modulatory influence albeit at reduced efficacy (intrinsic activity approx 26 of that of diazepam under the present test conditions) . For other assay conditions see Figure 9 .
occupancy is higher for the same magnitudes of pharmacological effects (Table 1), 66 it has lower efficacy in facilitating GABA-induced chloride flux in brain synaptoneurosomes (Figure 14) and lower efficacy in potentiating isoguvacine in hippocampal slices . 12 It has higher potency but lower efficacy in reducing cerebellar cGMP content (an index of Purkinje cell activity) ; low efficacy in producing mild sedation at doses far higher than those producing anticonvulsant and anticonflict effects (Figure 12) ; much less pronounced potentiation of ethanolinduced sedation ; and it antagonizes the sedating and motor performance-impairing effects of diazepam . Behavioural effects on chronic administration are sustained, i .e . there is little or no desensitization of GABAA receptors and virtually no physical dependence . 64,65 Lastly, in monkeys there is lack of induction and maintenance of intravenous self-administration . Clinical proof of the partial agonist concept is now required . To date, clinical studies have demonstrated the high potency of bretazenil as a therapeutic agent for generalized anxiety disorder and panic disorders, with minimal sedation in comparison to equi-anxiolytic doses of diazepam . Other partial agonists currently under clinical evaluation include FG 8205 (MS&D), 68 imidazo [ 1,2-a] pyrimidines e .g . RU 32698 (RousselUclaf), the ,ß-carboline abecarnil (Schering AG)69
and alpidem (Synthélabo) . 7° FG 8205 and abecarnil appear to have preclinical pharmacological profiles similar to that of bretazenil . Further clinical evaluation of bretazenil and its competitors is eagerly awaited .
Future perspectives Provided long-term clinical studies with partial agonists confirm the animal data (showing a virtual absence of profound sedation, tolerance, dependence liability and ethanol potentiation), benzodiazepine receptor ligands may well remain ideal therapeutic drugs . As yet undiscovered partial agonists with preferential affinities for certain receptor subunit variants 71 might also have unique pharmacological profiles with therapeutic utility . Recently, unexpected potential therapeutic indications for benzodiazepines have been revealed in clinical studies : the partial agonist bretazenil appears to have therapeutic potential for schizophrenia (see ref 2) and the antagonist flumazenil has been reported 58 to reverse tolerance to the antiepileptic effects of clonazepam, possibly by resetting the receptor to its naive state . The latter finding, if confirmed, will open up new avenues for the use of the respective antagonist for general treatment of tolerance and dependence to benzodiazepines and other therapeutic drugs .
202 Acknowledgement We thank our colleagues Drs P . Malherbe, J . Martin and E . Persohn as well as Miss M . Facklam for allowing us to quote unpublished findings and Mrs Martine Wdonwicki for secretarial assistance .
References 1 . Tobin AJ (1991) Molecular biological approaches to the synthesis and action of GABA . Semin Neurosci 3 :183-190 2 . Haefely W (1991) Comparative pharmacology of benzodiazepine receptor ligands with differing intrinsic efficacy, in Amino Acid Transmitters and Receptors : Structures, Transduction and Models for Drug Development (Barnard EA, Costa E, eds) . Raven Press, New York, in press 3 . Olsen RW, Venter CJ, eds (1986) Benzodiazepine/GABA Receptors and Chloride Channels : Structural and Functional Properties . Alan R Liss, New York 4 . Bowery N (1989) GABA B receptors and their significance in mammalian pharmacology . Trends Pharmacol Sci 10 : 401-407 5 . Macdonald RL, Twyman RE (1991) Biophysical properties and regulation of GABA A receptor channels . Semin Neurosci 3 :219-235 6 . Johnston GAR (1991) GABA A antagonists . Semin Neurosci 3 :205-210 7 . Bowery NG, Maguire JJ, Pratt GD (1991) Aspects of the molecular pharmacology of GABA B receptors . Semin Neurosci 3 :241-249 8 . Concas A, Santoro G, Serra M, Sanna E, Biggio G (1991) Neurochemical action of the general anaesthetic propofol on the chloride ion channel coupled with GABAA receptors . Brain Res, in press 9 . Ticku MK (1991) Drug modulation of GABA A-mediated transmission . Semin Neurosci 3 :211-218 10 . Chan CY, Farb DH (1985) Modulation of neurotransmitter action : control of the -y-aminobutyric acid response through the benzodiazepine receptor . J Neurosci 5 :2365-2373 11 . Yakushiji T, Fukada T, Oyama Y, Akaike N (1989) Effects of benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepine compounds on the GABA-induced response in frog isolated sensory neurones . Br J Pharmacol 98 :735-740 12 . Kemp JA, Marshall GR, Wong EHF, Woodruff GN (1987) The affinities, potencies and efficacies of some benzodiazepine-receptor agonists, antagonists and inverse agonists at rat hippocampal GABAA receptors . Br J Pharmacol 91 :601-608 13 . Young WSIII, Kuhar MJ (1980) Radiohistochemical localization of benzodiazepine receptors in rat brain . J Pharmacol Exp Ther 212 :337-346 14 . Squires RF, Braestrup C (1977) Benzodiazepine receptors in rat brain . Nature 266 :732 15 . Bosmann HB, Case R, DiStefano P (1977) Diazepam receptor characterization : specific binding of a benzodiazepine to macromolecules in various areas of rat brain . FEBS Lett 82 :368-372 16 . Möhler H, Okada T (1977) Benzodiazepine receptors : demonstration in the central nervous system . Science 198 :849-851 17 . Hunkeler W, Möhler H, Pieri L, Pole P, Bonetti EP, Cumin R, Schaffner R, Haefely W (1981) Selective antagonists of benzodiazepines . Nature 290 :514-516 18 . Haefely W, Hunkeler W (1988) The story of flumazenil . Fur J Anaesthesiol Suppl 2 :3-14 19 . Haefely W (1988) Endogenous ligands of the benzodiazepine receptor . Pharmacopsychiatry 21 :43-46
G . Richards et al
20 . Richards JG, Glinz R, Schoch P, Möhler H (1988) New trends in mapping benzodiazepine receptors, in Chloride Channels and Their Modulation by Neurotransmitters and Drugs (Biggio G, Costa E, eds), pp 27-46 . Raven Press, New York 21 . Olsen RW, McCabe RT, Wamsley JK (1990b) GABA A receptor subtypes, autoradiographic comparison of GABA, benzodiazepine, and convulsant binding sites in rat central nervous system . J Chem Neuroanat 3 :59-76 22 . McCabe RT, Wamsley JK, Yezuita JP, Olsen RW (1988) A novel GABAA antagonist ['H ] SR 95531 : microscopic analysis of binding in the rat brain and allosteric modulation by several benzodiazepine and barbiturate receptor ligands . Synapse 2 :163-173 23 . Zezula J, Cortés R, Probst A, Palacios JM (1988) Benzodiazepine receptor sites in the human brain, autoradiographic mapping . Neuroscience 25 :771-795 24 . Edgar PP, Schwartz RD (1990) Localization and characterization of 35S-t-butyl-bicyclophosphorothionate binding in rat brain : an autoradiographic study . J Neurosci 10 : 603-612 25 . Massotti M, Schlichting J, Antonacci MD, Giusti P, Memo M, Costa E, Guidotti A (1991) GABA A receptor heterogeneity in rat CNS : studies with clonazepam and other benzodiazepine ligands . J Pharmacol Exp Ther 256 :1154-1160 26 . Richards JG, Schoch P, Häring P, Takacs B, Möhler H (1987) Resolving GABAA/benzodiazepine receptors : cellular and subcellular localization in the CNS with monoclonal antibodies . J Neurosci 7 :1866-1886 27 . Houser CR, Olsen RW, Richards JG, Möhler H (1988) Immunohistochemical localization of benzodiazepine! GABAA receptors in human hippocampal formation . J Neurosci 8 :1370-1383 28 . Waldvogel HJ, Fault RLM, Jansen KLR, Richards JG, Möhler H, Streit P (1990) Benzodiazepine receptors and GABA in the human spinal cord, an autoradiographic and immunohistochemical study at the light and electron microscopic levels . Neuroscience 39 :361-385 29 . Schubiger PA, Hasler PH, eds (1990) lomazenil and Other Brain Receptor Tracers for SPECT, pp 1-135 . Editiones Roche Basel, Switzerland 30 . Schofield PR, Darlison MG, Fujita N, Burt DR, Stephenson FA, Rodriguez H, Rhee LM, Ramachandran J, Reale V, Glencorse TA, Seeburg PH, Barnard EA (1987) Sequence and functional expression of the GABA A receptor shows a ligand-gated receptor super-family . Nature 328 : 221-227 31 . Stephenson FA (1988) Understanding the GABA A receptor : a chemically-gated ion channel . Biochem J 249 :21-32 32 . Sieghart W (1989) Multiplicity of GABA A-benzodiazepine receptors . Trends Pharmac Sci 10 :407-411 33 . Olsen RW, Tobin AJ (1990) Molecular biology of GABA A receptors . FASEB J 4 :1469-1480 34 . Bormann J (1988) Electrophysiology of GABA A and GABA B receptor subtypes . Trends Neurosci 11 :112-116 35 . Lüddens H, Pritchett DB, Köhler M, Killisch 1, Keinänen K, Monyer H, Sprengel R, Seeburg PH (1990) Cerebellar GABAA receptor selective for a behavioural alcohol antagonist . Nature 346 :648-651 36 . Malherbe P, Sigel E, Baur R, Persohn E, Richards JG, Möhler H (1990) Functional expression and sites of gene transcription of a novel a-subunit of the GABA A -receptor in rat brain . FEBS Lett 260 :261-265 37 . Pritchett DB, Seeburg PH (1990) -y -Aminobutyric acid .,, receptor a5-subunit creates novel type II benzodiazepine receptor pharmacology . J Neurochem 54 :1802-1804 38 . Pritchett DB, Lüddens H, Seeburg PH (1989) Type I and type II GABAA benzodiazepine receptors produced in transfected cells . Science 245 :1389-1392
Benzodiazepine receptors : new vistas 39 . Ymer S, Draguhn A, Wisden W, Werner P, Keinänen K, Schofield PR, Sprengel R, Pritchett DB, Seeburg PH (1990) Structural and functional characterization of the yl subunit of GABAA/benzodiazepine receptors . The EMBO J 9 : 3261-3267 40 . Shivers BD, Killisch I, Sprengel R, Sontheimer H, Köhler M, Schofield PR, Seeburg PH (1989) Two novel GABAA receptor subunits exist in distinct neuronal subpopulations . Neuron 3 :327-337 41 . Ymer S, Schofield PR, Draguhn A, Werner P, Köhler M, Seeburg P (1989) GABAA receptor 0 subunit heterogeneity, functional expression of cloned cDNAs . EMBO J 8 :1665-1670 42 . Möhler H, Malherbe P, Richards JG, Persohn E, Benke D, Barth M, Rhyner T, Sigel E (1991) GABAA receptor gene expression and regulation, in Neurotransmitter Regulation of Gene Transcription (Costa E, ed) . Raven Press, New York, in press 43 . Stephenson FA (1991) The GABA A receptors : structure and function . Curr Asp Neurosci 3 :177-193 44 . Sigel E, Baur R, Trube G, Möhler H, Malherbe P (1990) The effect of subunit composition of rat brain GABA A receptors on channel function . Neuron 5 :703-711 45 . Malherbe P, Sigel E, Baur R, Persohn E, Richards JG, Möhler H (1990) Functional characteristics and sites of gene expression of the al,01,y2-isoform of the rat GABAA receptor . J Neurosci 10 :2330-2338 46 . Schofield PR, Shivers BS, Seeburg PH (1990) The role of receptor subtype diversity in the CNS . Trends Neurosci 13 :8-11 47 . Stephenson FA, Duggan MJ, Pollard S (1990) The y2 subunit is an integral component of the y-aminobutyric acid A receptor but the al polypeptide is the principal site of the agonist benzodiazepine photoaffinity labeling reaction . J Biol Chem 265 :21160-21165 48 . Séquier JM, Richards JG, Malherbe P, Price GW, Mathews S, Möhler H (1988) Mapping of brain areas containing RNA homologous to cDNAs encoding the a and 13 subunits of the rat GABAA g-aminobutyrate receptor . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85 :7815-7819 49 . Siegel RE (1988) The mRNAs encoding GABA A /benzodiazepine receptor subunits are localized in different cell populations of the bovine cerebellum . Neuron 1 :579-584 50 . Persohn E, Malherbe P, Richards JG (1990) In situ hybridization histochemistry reveals a diversity of GABA A receptor subunit mRNAs in neurons of the rat spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia . Neuroscience 42 :497-507 51 . Wisden W, McNaughton LA, Darlison MG, Hunt SP, Barnard EA (1989) Differential distribution of GABA A receptor mRNAs in bovine cerebellum-localization of a2 mRNA in Bergmann glia layer . Neurosci Lett 106 :7-12 52 . Wisden W, Morris BJ, Darlison MG, Hunt SP, Barnard EA (1989) Localization of GABAA receptor a-subunit mRNAs in relation to receptor subtypes . Molec Brain Res 5 :305-3 10 53 . Wisden W, Morris BJ, Darlison MG, Hunt SP, Barnard EA (1988) Distinct GABAA receptor a subunit mRNAs show differential patterns of expression in bovine brain . Neuron 1 :937-947 54 . ZhangJ-H, Sato M, Noguchi K, Tohyama M (1990) The differential expression patterns of the mRNAs encoding 3 subunits (ßl, 02 and 33) of GABA A receptor in the olfactory bulb and its related areas in the rat brain . Neurosci Lett 119 :257 :260 55 . Haefely W, Martin JR, Schoch P (1990) Novel anxiolytics acting as partial agonists at benzodiazepine receptors . Trends Pharmacol Sci 11 :452-456 56 . Thomson D, Geller E, Lauven P, Whitwam J (1990) Midazolam and flumazenil : the agonist-antagonist concept for sedation and anaesthesia . Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 34 suppl 92
203 57 . Basile AS, Pannell L, Jaouni T, Gammal SH, Fales HM, Jones EA, Skolnick P (1990) Brain concentrations of benzodiazepines are elevated in an animal model of hepatic encephalopathy . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87 : 5263-5267 58 . Savic I, Widén L, Stone-Elander S (1991) Feasibility of reversing benzodiazepine tolerance with flumazenil . The Lancet 337 :133-137 59 . Deacon RMJ, Budhram P, Dowson D, Galliani G, Guy AP, Gardner CR (1990) Investigation of potential cognition enhancing properties of RU 33965, a benzodiazepine receptor partial inverse agonist . Psychopharmacology 101 (suppl) :45 60 . Sarter M, Stephens DN (1989) Disinhibitory properties of beta-carboline antagonists of benzodiazepine receptors : a possible therapeutic approach for senile dementia? Biochem Soc Trans 17 :81-83 61 . Lopez F, Miller G, Greenblatt DJ, Chesley S, Schatzki A, Shader RI (1990) Chronic administration of benzodiazepines-V . Rapid onset of behavioral and neurochemical alterations after discontinuation of alprazolam . Neuropharmacology 29 :237-241 62 . Haigh JRM, Feely M (1988) Tolerance to the anticonvulsant effect of benzodiazepines . Trends Pharmacol Sci 9 : 361-366 63 . Miller LG, Galpern WR, Greenblatt DJ, Lumpkin M, Shader RI (1990) Chronic benzodiazepine administration . VI . A partial agonist produces behavioral effects without tolerance or receptor alterations . J Pharmacol Exp Ther 254 :33-38 64 . Martin JR, Kuwahara A, Horii I, Moreau J-L, Jenck F, Sepinwall J, Haefely W (1990) Evidence that the benzodiazepine receptor partial agonist Ro 16-6028 has minimal abuse and physical dependence liability . Soc Neurosci, abstract 451 .9 65 . Moreau J-L, Jenck F, Pieri L, Martin JR, Haefely WE (1990) Physical dependence induced in DBA/2J mice by benzodiazepine receptor full agonists, but not the partial agonist Ro 16-6028 . Eur J Pharmacol 190 : 269-273 66 . Facklam M, Schoch P, Haefely W (1991) Relationship between benzodiazepine receptor (BZR) occupancy and effect in vitro and in vivo : comparison of triazolam, diazepam, Ro 19-8022 and bretazenil . Experientia 47 :A11 67 . Potier M-C, Prada de Carvalho L, Verrault P, Chapouthier G, Rossier J (1988) Demonstration of the partial agonist profiles of Ro 16-6028 and Ro 17-1812 in mice in vivo . Eur J Pharmacol 156 :169-172 68 . Tricklebank MD, Honoré T, Iversen SD, Kemp JA, Knight AR, Marshall GR, Rupniak MJ, Singh L, Tye S, Watjen F, Wong EHF (1990) The pharmacological properties of the imidazobenzodiazepine, FG 8205, a novel partial agonist at the benzodiazepine receptor . Br J Pharmacol 101 :753-761 69 . Stephens DN, Schneider HH, Kehr W, Andrews JS, Rettig K-J, Turski L, Schmiechen R, Turner JD, Jensen LH, Petersen EN, Honoré T, Hansen JB (1990) Abecarnil, a metabolically stable, anxioselective beta carboline acting at benzodiazepine receptors . J Pharmacol Exp Ther 253 :334-343 70 . Langer SZ, Arbilla S, Tan S, Lloyd KG, George P, Allen J, Wick AE (1990) Selectivity for omega-receptor subtypes as a strategy for the development of anxiolytic drugs . Pharmacopsychiatry 23 (suppl) :103-107 71 . Costa E (1990) `Spare receptors' and `partial agonists'romantic terms to explain a pharmacology deriving from the structural diversity of GABAA receptors, in GABA and Benzodiazepine Receptor Subtypes (Biggio G, Costa E, eds), pp 221-229 . Raven Press, New York