Chemosphere, Vol.19, Ncs.8/9, Printed in G r e a t B r i t a i n
pp
1297-1308,
1989
0045-6535/89 $3.00 Pergamon Press plc
+
.OO
BIODKGRADATION OF CHLORINATED DIBENZO-p-DIOXINS IN BATCH AND CONTINUOUS CULTUKF.S OF STRAIN JBI
J.R. Parsons* and M.C.M.
Laboratory of Environmental University
of Amsterdam,
Storms
and Toxicological
Nieuwe Achtergracht
Amsterdam,
Chemistry, 166, 1018 WV
The Netherlands.
Abstract The biphenyl-utilizing
Alcaligenes
strain JBI cometabolizes
but is not able to grow on this compound. dibenzo-p-dioxins dichlorodioxins metabolism
of
accumulated
mixture
takes place in benzoate-grown was
induced
chemostat
the monochlorodioxin.
exposure
of chlorinated
p-dioxins
in
in cell-free extracts,
Continuous
A dihydroxylated
of a 3-methylbenzoate-grown
dibenzo-p-dioxins
and 1,2,4-trichloro-p-dioxin,
compounds
were
calculated
To whom correspondence
together
Ready cometabolism
of these
with
rate
metabolite
resulted
chemostat
of
an
increased
this
culture
in degradation
but there was no evidence The pseudo-flrst
latter
of
compound
may be addressed.
1297
of strain JBI to a
of 1,3- and 2,8-dichlorofor significant
order biodegradation
from their concentrations
which the culture was exposed.
*
batch cultures.
cultures,
2-chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin,
of 1,3-, 2,7- and 2,8-dichloro-
but was not detected in growing cultures.
tion of 1,2,3,4-tetrachloro-p-dioxln. of these
Slow cometabolism
in the culture
degrada-
rate constants and those
to
1298
Introduction Polychlorinated [I].
Despite
compounds,
all
dibenzo-p-dioxins
the
efforts
(PCDD's)
devoted
to
well
studies
of
known
the
environmental
environmental
pollutants
fate
of
these
little is known about their metabolism by microorganisms.
Metabolism salicylate,
has
but
been
not by
the dioxin.
reported
of dibenzo-p-dioxin
succlnate-grown
dihydrodibenzo-p-dioxin
and
cultures
No further metabolism
from these compounds were
thus
not
were potent degraded
strain
species
isolated
was detected.
of the dloxygenases
rate of metabolism
grown
as metabolites
Comparable
to grow on biphenyl
able
The
were
species
on
[2]. 1,2-Dihydroxy-l,2-
and a number of its mono-,
inhibitors
further.
a Pseudomonas
by
this
of these compounds
by a Beijerinckia
ted derivatives
of
1,2-dihydroxydibenzo-p-dioxin
and diols were formed from dibenzo-p-dloxin
and
are
dihydrodiols
di- and trichlorina[3].
The diols
required
of
of
the
formed
for ring fission
chlorinated
dioxins
decreased with increasing degree of chlorination. The
rate
bacteria TCDD
of
appears
metabolism
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
of
to be very slow.
Traces
Cultures
of bacteria
isolated
from soil contaminated
for several weeks with 14C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 1-1.5%
of
the
total
radioactivity
soils and sediments: days in sediments We
here
half
lives were between
report
the
Materials
was
of
a
transformed
very
JBI
substrate.
was
Although
Cultures
number
of
in
chlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins
in
Alcalisenes strain JBI.
of the biphenyl-utilizlng
isolated
from soil by selective
enrichment
using biphenyl
further
glass stoppered as
experiments
nutrients
erlenmeyer
solutions
inoculated
as carbon
this strain was at first thought to be a Pseudomonas strain
for degradation
acid and
cultures
for only slowly
were formed.
has since been identified as an Alcaligenes strain by means of the API-2ONE
added
and incubated
which accounted
and methods
Strain
zoic
from 2,3,7,8-
130 and 400 days in soil and longer than 600
polar metabolltes
cometabolism
also
by
isolated from soil
by 2,3,7,8-TCDD
formed a polar metabollte,
[6]. 1,3,6,8-TCDD
[7]. Unidentified
chemostat and batch cultures
were produced
of Nocardiopsis and Bacillus strains
in soil and in pure cultures
[4,5].
of polar metabolltes
(2,3,7,8-TCDD)
in
flasks
I ml
once
bacterial
were
well
into
or methanol
growth
the
elsewhere
[8].
Batch
was
stationary
either
visible.
phase
at
the
Incubations
of their
growth
were
grown
in
PCDD's were
same
time
were
continued
curve
it
acid or 3-methylben-
cultures
to limit losses of PCDD's by volatilization.
acetone
or
were grown on i g/l benzoic
as reported
[8,9],
test system.
the medium
(usually
until
was the
48 or 72 h
after inoculation).
was
Continuous
cultures
limited
ca.
experiments
to were
chemost=t
system
identical
to
accounted
for by
20
grown to
avoid
the
compounds
carried
out,
not containing
those
under
which
dilution.
0.020 h "I. PCDD's were or methanol)
were ml/min
The
in the system
bacteria. bacteria cultures
were
were were
tested
grown, grown
previously
volatilization
No detectable
added to the cultures
or continuously
described
excessive
for
at dilution
Column.
[9]. The aeration PCDD's.
of
Before
volatilization
occurred
rates
either as a pulse
using a generator
their
losses the
of
under
conditions
disappearance
rates
between
(dissolved
any in a
being
0.045
and
in I ml acetone
This column contained
15 g Chromo-
1299
sorb
GAW
(45-60
mesh)
loaded
with
1,2,3,4-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
ca.
5 mg
each
(I,3-DCDD,
of
1,3-di-,
2,8-DCDD,
2,8-di-,
1,2,4-TrCDD
1,2,4-tri-
and
and
1,2,3,4-TCDD,
resp.). Samples after
of
cultures
addition
(typically
of hexachlorobenzene
50 ml) as
were
extracted
with
internal
standard.
The
after centrifugation and reduced in volume up by being eluted
equal hexane
volumes layer
through a column containing ca.
of
the
PCDD's
were
removed
i g each of 100-120 mesh silica + 40% (Tracor 550,
GC on 160-180 mesh Chromosorb 750, I m x 2 mm; Hewlett-Packard 5890, DB-5, recoveries
was
to ca. I ml. This extract then underwent clean-
w/w H2SO 4 and silica + 33% w/w I N NaOH. Analysis was by GC-ECD
The
of hexane
determined
by
analyzing
samples
2% Dexil 300
30 m x 0.33 nun). containing
known
quantities of these compounds and were routinely above 90%. Control experiments were carried out under sterile but otherwise identical conditions. Crude cell extract was used in experiments designed to yield metabolites. was
obtained by
treating
with a Branson sonifier and incubated
for
Acidification
with
a concentrated
cell suspension
H2SO4,
2-chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin extraction
with hexane
The sample was redissolved
I ml
were
added and
(2-CDD)
(added as acetone
and evaporation
in 20 ml acetone,
the mixture was
filtered and again evaporated to dryness. gave after filtration
cultures)
(75 W, i0 x 20 sec). The extract was suspended in phosphate buffer
5 h with
dryness followed. iodomethane
The extract
(from 300 ml chemostat
refluxed
solution).
of the hexane
layer
to
i g potassium carbonate and
for 8 h. The mixture
was
then
Dissolution in toluene or 2,2,4-trimethylpentane
a sample which was analyzed on a Finnigan 1020 GC-MS in the E1 mode
at 70 eV (Supelco SP2331 column). The chlorodioxins were synthesized as reported [i0,ii].
Results The strain used the
carbon
strain
source,
was
in the experiments and
screened
cometabolizes
for
its
ability
described was isolated from soil with biphenyl as a number
of
to degrade
chlorinated
other
growth was observed on chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins. this strain were The
results,
degradation
of
1,3-,
dichlorodioxins cultures,
in
Table 2,7-
i,
and
indicated 2,8-DCDD.
ready
degradation
However,
[8]. When
aromatic
this
compounds
no
Benzoic acid-grown batch cultures of
then tested for their ability to cometabolize
shown
biphenyls
chlorinated
this
mono- and dichlorodioxins. of
2-CDD
apparently
but
slow
much
slower
degradation
of
may have been caused by the conditions under which bacteria grow in batch
rather
than
only
reflecting
an
intrinsic
poor
degradability
of
these
latter
compounds. Typical
results
benzoate-grown acetone
obtained
chemostat
solution
in two experiments with mixtures of 2-CDD and 2,8-DCDD in a
culture
of these
of
strain JBI
compounds was
are
injected
shown
in Fig.
i. In experiment
i an
into a culture which had not previously
been exposed to PCDD's.
2-CDD disappeared from the culture at a rate much higher than that
attributed
(dilution
to
dilution
first-order
degradation.
24 h
the
place.
after
start
of
rate constant
In contrast, the
D - 0.045 h'l),
and apparently
underwent
no degradation of 2,8-DCDD was detected until about
experiment,
when
induction
of degradation
appeared
to take
1300
100
0
0.1
I
0
6
I
I
I
12
18
24
time
Fig. I.
90
(h)
Repeated experiments with mixtures of 2-CDD and 2,8-DCDD in a chemostat of strain JBI. The line marked D indicates the dilution rate. Experiment i: o 2-CDD; ~ 2,8-DCDD. Experiment 2: --e-- 2-CDD; A 2,8-DCDD.
10
131
J o
o
0.1 0
i
J
J
J
5
10
15
20
time 0
Fig. 2.
2.7-E)(=E~3
Experiment with 2,7-DCDD
(h) ....... 11)=0.045
h- 1
in a chemostat culture of strain JBI.
25
culture
1301
TABLE 1 DEGRADATION OF PCDD's IN BATCH CULTURES OF STRAIN JBI PCDD
Incubation period (h)
Initial conc.(~g/l)
Final conc, Culture
2-CDD
70 48 66 66 48 24
14.0 321 290 315 27.5 252
nd** 7.3 200 210 Ii.0 322
1,3-DCDD 2,7-DCDD 2,8-DCDD
_+1.3 ±6 _+I0 _+14 _+1.9 _+12
(~Ii) Control 10.3 213 260 315 17.6 330
±4.1 ±20 _+30 _+0.2 ±3
±2.4 _+12 ±20 ±5 ±1.6 _+9
*_+SD. **Not detected.
When this experiment degradation g/i)
of
after
2-CDD
6 h.
Initial exposure culture,
was repeated
was
There
rapid, was
now
of the culture
presumably
also
the
evidence
for
by induction
of degradative
first-order
enzymes,
growth
observed
in
chemostat increased
batch
of
batch
of
2),
(ca.
i
2,8-DCDD.
led to adaptation of the
and thus to increased degradation
cultures,
cultures.
However,
degradation
degradation
which
the
of dichlorodioxins
in batch and chemostat
and
may
fact of
thus
of 2,7-DCDD
that
explain
batch
(Table 2) indicates
cultures has a dominating
ON DEGRADATION
(Fig.
2) and
206 17.2 18.8 9.4 0.59
49.1 17.4 20.6 10.2 0.61
A chemostat h -I,
was
1,2,3,4-TCDD.
from a chemostat
exposed
continuously
generator
to the culture.
degradation
of chlorinated
of this experiment
column
_+15.2 _+0.9 _+0.3 +0.3 -+0.15
5.1 16.3 15.9 9.4 0.64
_+0.3 -+1.5 _+1.6 -+0.8 +0.05
228 21.2 19.8 9.0 0.60
culture exposed continuously
to a mixture
was
A similar biphenyls
used
to
in the culture
(Cc) were However,
from
not
a
show
in growth
system was
in chemostat
cultures
significantly
to PCDD's.
2,8-DCDD,
these
used previously
_+44 _+3.1 +3.0 +1.5 +0.14
acid at a dilution rate of
of 1,3-DCDD,
dissolve
are shown in Fig. 3. The concentrations
(ANOVA test, P
did
(±SD) Control
culture of strain JBI, grown on 3-methylbenzoic
A
inoculated
induced,
OF PCDD's IN BATCH CULTURE
21,32,81,2,41,2,3,4-
inoculated
degradation
that the difference
Final concentration (#g/l) Pre-exposed* Unexposed
*Cultures
was
is comparable
limited
influence.
Initial conc. (~g/1) (±SD) +8 +-0.2 +0.i -+0.i +0.01
the
cultures,
dichlorodioxins
PCDD
TrCDD
degradation
for the induction of degradation
in
TABLE 2 INFLUENCE OF PRE-EXPOSURE
supplied
level
induction period for the degradation of the dichlorodioxins
phase
culture
conditions
0.044
(experiment
the detection
(data not shown).
The apparent to
falling below
to these compounds had apparently
rates. There was similar evidence 1,3-DCDD
14 days later with the same culture
concentrations
in
to determine
of strain JBI of 1,3-DCDD,
lower than those
1,2,4-TrCDD
compounds
the
the rates
of
[9]. The results
2,8-DCDD and 1,2,4-
in the influent medium
this was not the case for 1,2,3,4-TCDD
and
medium
(P>O.IO).
(Cm)
1302
1,3-DCDD 10
d 0 O
2
0 0
2
4
6
8
10
8
10
t,rne (d) o
Cm
+
Cc
2,8-DCDD 10
(]
2
0 0
2
4
6 time (d)
Cm
+
Ge
1303
1,2,4-TrCDD 10
T d o o
E
2
0 0
I
I
[
4
6
8
10
time (el) o
+
On
Cc
1,2,3,4-TCDD 1.00
0.80
0.60
0
0.40
O-20
0.00 0
1
I
I
I
2
4
6
8
time On
Fig. 3,
10
(d) +
Cc
Continuous exposure of a 3-methylbenzoate-grown chemostat culture of strain JBI to a mixture of 1,3-DCDD, 2,8-DCDD, 1,2,4-TrCDD and 1,2,3,4-TCDD. Cm= concentration in the influent medium; Cc= concentration in the culture (±SD).
1304
Pseudo
first-order
biodegradation
rate constants
were
calculated
with
the
following
steady state mass balance equation:
D
where
D
is
the
dilution
Cm
rate
volatilization rate constant.
k b' C c
=
constant,
+
k b'
D Cc
+
kv C c
and k v
the
For the compounds considered here, k v is not significant,
the biodegradation
rate
constant
and
thus:
D(Cm kb '
Cc)
-
Cc
The values of k b' thus calculated are given in Table 3.
TABLE 3 BIODEGRADATION RATE CONSTANTS OF PCDD's IN A CHEMOSTAT CULTURE OF STRAIN JBI PCDD
Concentrations Cm**
1,3-DCDD 2,8-DCDD 1,2,4-TrCDD
2.82 ±i.ii 5.80 ±2.20 4.84 ±1.87
;(b (h- I ) (±SD)
( ~ / I ) ~$~D) Cc 0.636 ±0.174 0.195 ±0.054 2.03 ±0.95
*First-order biodegradation rate constant. ***Concentration in culture.
0o180 ±0.106 1.37 ±0.62 0.075 ±0.058
**Concentration in influent medium.
The isolation of metabolites of 2-CDD was carried out by incubating this compound with crude were
cell
detected
retention had
extract
obtained
by GC-MS
from an adapted
analysis
time had a molecular
a molecular
ion of m/z
chemostat
of a methylated ion of m/z 218
278,
culture.
extract.
of a methoxy group in a lateral (e.g.
In repeated
experiment,
a metabolite
of a monomethoxymonochlorodioxin
and was
with
2-CDD.
compounds
the
shortest
The second peak
to a dimethoxymonochlorodioxin.
spectrum contained M + - 15, M + - 43 and M + - 58 fragments characteristic
The compound
(35Gi peak)
corresponding
Two chlorinated
Its mass
(Fig. 4). The M + - 15 fragment is
2 or 3) position
[12].
with m/z 248 and a mass spectrum characteristic
was detected
(Fig.
5). The mass spectrum of this compound
also contained both M + - 15 and M + - 43 peaks, again indicating that the methoxy group was in a
lateral
(100:47:57) [12],
position.
differ
suggesting
compound dioxin.
is
from
that
either
The
relative
those
intensities
reported
the methoxy
group
for
of
the M +,
M+
- 15
and M +
2-chloro-3-methoxydlbenzo-p-dioxin
is in either
the 7 or 8 positions,
2-chloro-7-methoxydibenzo-p-dioxin
or
- 43
peaks
(100:70:93
i.e.
that the
2-chloro-8-methoxydibenzo-p-
1305
I00-
50
M+-15 M*.58
~..:.:..,~.~,~:,,~,.,..~J.,..,;,,.~,L,,,..:?,..~.,:,L 100
Fig. 4,
i
M~_/.3
,I:, I,,,L . !. : ~.., .:......... ,~I, ...... .:..,.[.:.
200
3O0
m/z
Mass spectrum of the dimethoxychlorodioxin incubations of strain JBI with 2-CDD.
isolated
after
methylation
from
100
I M÷_~3 50
M*_15
..,'!.:
I
,,ill.
. , . ,
. . . .
t ,I.,,..,,...,.!'
! . . . .
.
.... ,. ........
,
I,.,
,. •
IO0
Fig. 5.
150
mlz
200
Mass spectrum of the monomethoxychlorodioxin incubations of strain JBI with 2-CDD.
'
. . . .
I ; ' ' ' ,
. . . .
I. 250
I . . . .
'
isolated after
. . . .
methylation
from
1306
Klecka
and
Gibson
described
the
isolation
of
1,2-dihydrodiols
metabolites of dibenzo-p-dloxin and its monochlorlnated derivatives
and
1,2-dihydroxy
[2,3]. 1,2-Dihydroxy-
1,2-dihydrodibenzo-p-dloxin underwent acid-catalyzed dehydration to yield 2-hydroxydibenzop-dioxin,
as did the chlorinated derivatives.
1,2-Dihydroxylated metabolltes
(catechols)
were formed by further metabolism of the dihydrodlols. The results reported by Klecka and Gibson suggest that the monomethoxychlorodioxin described above
is the methylated derivative of a monohydroxychlorodioxin formed during
work-up by acid-catalyzed dehydration of a dihydrodlol and that the dimethoxychlorodioxin is the methylated derivative of the dihydroxylated metabolite of the dihydrodiol (Fig. 6). These metabolites cultures,
could not be detected when 2-CDD was degraded in batch or chemostat
which may mean that growing cells are capable of further metabolism,
although
identification of other metabolites is required before firm conclusions can be drawn.
Ct4 L , ~ / ~
"
C
t
~
H
1,2-dihydrodiol
2 -CDD
1. + C
Fig. 6.
I
~
H
Proposed pathway for the initial degradation of 2-CDD by strain JBI.
Discussion
Bacteria growing in batch cultures are exposed to an excess of nutrients for almost the whole growth phase. This, in which
cometabolism
and the limited length of the growth phase,
is possible,
i.e. the period
may make cometabollsm of some xenobiotic
chemicals
unfavourable in batch cultures. In the environment, bacteria are always under the influence of a nutrient limitation. This is also the case in a chemostat culture, in which bacteria can be grown under different nutrient limitations [13]. Therefore, we consider a chemostat
1307
culture
a more
more,
the
culture
realistic
use
of
a
chemostat
to xenobiotic
adaptation
of
the
The
culture.
these compounds and 2). thus
is
differences
under
systems
1,3-,
is almost
not
expose
and
a
of chemostat
I).
cultures
faster
in
grown
suited
degradation
batch
in batch
cultures
of
is that
the constant order.
is slow
cultures
of the batch
pre-induced
the
bacteria
carbon
limitation
well
to systematic
was probably
defined studies
cultures
conditions
that
indicates
that
cultures are
influence.
chemostats,
of the influence
and may
fact
used in this work were
of great in
of
(Figs. i
cultures
However,
under which bacteria grow in batch and chemostat
under
in benzoic
degradation
to the cultures
cultures.
the fact that the chemostat
growing
induction and
to pseudo-first
In chemostat
Further-
enzyme
2,8-dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (Table
studies.
continuously
thus favouring
as long as the growth phase
slow
In particular,
be
well
to
periods,
advantage
strain JBI
apparently
a continuous
can
it possible
the kinetics of biodegradation 2,7-
of
in the conditions
most important.
bacteria
makes
for biodegradation
is induced about 20-24 hours after their addition
the
degradation
grown
of
cultures
for extended
Another
cultures
This period
explain
also
simplifies
degradation batch
than batch
chemicals
biomass concentration
acid-grown
system
Cultures
which
of environmental
makes
of
these
parameters
on
biodegradation. Klecka
and Gibson
bacteria
grown
on
by the Pseudomonas this compound indicate
Degradative
[2,3].
or
in
derivatives
and dichlorodioxins
in the degradation
are
presence
of
strain,
(Beije-
hiphenyl
for its degradation
strain were induced by
able to induce degradative
systems
chlorinated
but not by dichlorodioxins.
as an Alcaligenes
of aromatic
its
These compounds were metabolized
the
in the Beijerinckia
enzymes
and its monochlorinated
which we have now identified
involved
strains
and
was not able to induce the enzymes required
strain.
that mono-
of dibenzo-p-dioxin
(Pseudomonas)
salicylate
rinckia). Dibenzo-p-dioxin
JPBI,
the metabolism
by Pseudomonas and Beijerinckia
derivatives by
described
Our results
enzymes
in strain
although
some of the enzymes
are of course already
induced in cultures
growing on benzoate. As
expected,
dibenzo-p-dioxins benzoate-grown 1,3-DCDD,
2-CDD
is degraded
(e.g.
Fig.
chemostat
2,8-DCDD,
detection
level
0.i
dioxins tions,
values
are not but
degradation
by
rates
The
much
1,2,3,4-TCDD
the
membranes
(Table
influenced
other
slower
of
and
that
has
This
by steric
factors,
trace
than of
the more
this
such
unsubstituted
transport
effects
molecules
in
a
and
In fact, 2,8-DCDD rates
of these
on the metabolic
to consider
would
reacof the
that the value of
to a half llfe of 0.5 h.
of 1,2,4-TrCDD
with
ring,
As an indication
and the apparent
lack of degradation
have a completely
unsubstituted
attack would be expected to occur quite readily.
for
found
to a mixture of 2-CDD,
aromatic
processes.
it may be of interest
molecules
chlorinated
was
that the degradation
and electronic
as
since both structures
hydrophohlc
highly
compound
(data not shown: C c of 2-CDD ca. i00 ~g/l; an
suggests
(Table 3) corresponds
degradation
is suprising,
size
rapidly
no
much more readily than 2,8-DCDD.
3).
in this experiment,
ring where enzymatic that
1,3-DCDD
to be metabolized
1.37 for k b' of 2,8-DCDD
more
fact,
and 1,2,3,4-TCDD
pg/l).
of k b'
only
also
much
In
culture of strain JBI exposed continuously
1,2,4-TrCDD
ca.
therefore be expected had a higher
i).
influences a cross
their
section
diffusion
larger
than
of
aromatic
It has been suggested through 9.5
A
biological
diffusion
is
1308
blocked [14]. This was proposed to explain the lack of uptake by
fish of such hydrophobic
chemicals as hexabromobenzene, which has an octanol-water partition coefficient higher than 10 6 and a cross section of 9.6 A. The cross sections of 1,2,4-TrCDD and 1,2,3,4-TCDD (9.8 [14] are even larger than that of hexabromobenzene and may restrict their rate of diffusion into microbial cells, and thus their biodegradation rate. The metabolites extract
suggest
that
dibenzo-p-dioxins were
not
of 2-CDD isolated from incubations of this compound with crude cell its
degradation
follows
a similar
pathway
to
that of
chlorinated
in Pseudomonas and Beijerinckia strains [2,3] (Fig. 6). These metabolites
identified
in
growing
cultures
degradation under such conditions,
exposed
to
2-CDD,
which
may
indicate
further
although further work is obviously required to clarify
this.
Acknowledgements The authors thank M. van den Berg and J.M.D. van der Steen for technical assistance, and O.M. Neijssel and A. Opperhuizen for stimulating discussions. References 1 O. Hutzinger, M.J. Blumich, M. van den Berg and K. Olie, Sources and fate of PCDD's and PCDF's: an overview, Chemosphere, 14(1985)581-600. 2 G.M. Klecka and D.T. Gibson, Metabolism of dibenzo[l,4]dioxan by a Pseudomonas species, Biochem. J., 180(1979)639-645. 3 G.M. Klecka and D.T. Gibson, Metabolism of dlbenzo-p-dloxin and chlorinated dibenzo-pdioxins by a Beijerinckia species, Appl. Environ. Microblol., 39(1980)639-645. 4 F. Matsumara and H.J. Benezet, Studies on the bioaccumulation and microbial degradation of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxln, Environ. Health Perspect., 5(1973)253258. 5 J.F. Quensen, III, and F. Matsumara, Oxidative degradation of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin by microorganisms, Environ. Toxlcol. Chem., 2(1983)261-268. 6 M. Philippi, J. Schmid, H.K. Wipf and R.A. HOtter, A microbial metabolite of TCDD, Experientia, 38(1982)659-661. 7 D.C.G. Muir, A.L. Yarechewski, R.L. Corbet, G.R.B. Webster and A.E. Smith, Laboratory and field studies on the fate of l,,3,6,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in soil and sediments, J. Agric. Food Chem., 33(1985)518-523. 8 J.R. Parsons, D.T.H.M. SiJm, A. van Laar and O. Hutzinger, Biodegradation of chlorinated biphenyls and benzoic acids by a Pseudomonas strain, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 29(1988)81-84. 9 J.R. Parsons and D.T.H.M. Slim, Biodegradation kinetics of polychlorinated biphenyls in continuous cultures of a Pseudomonas species, Chemosphere, 17(1988)1755-1766. I0. A.E. Pohland and G.C. Young, Preparation and characterization of chlorinated dibenzop-dioxins, J. Agric. Food Chem., 20(1972)1093-1099. ii. A.P. Gray, S.P. Cepa, I.J. Solomon and O. Aniline, Synthesis of specific polychlorinated dlbenzo-p-dioxins, J. Org. Chem., 41(1976)2435-2437. 12. M.Th.M. Tulp and O. Hutzinger, Identification of hydroxylated chlorodibenzo-p-dioxins, chlorodibenzofurans, chlorodlphenyl ethers and chloronaphthalenes as their methyl ethers by gas chromatography mass spectrometry, Biomed. Mass Spectrom., 5(1978)224-231. 13. H.G. Schlegel, General Microbiology, Sixth ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986. 14. A. Opperhuizen, E.W. v.d. Velde, F.A.P.C. Gobas, D.A.K. Liem, J.M.D. v.d, Steen and O. Hutzinger, Relationship between bioeoncentration in fish and steric factors of hydrophobic chemicals in fish, Chemosphere, 14(1985)1871-1896. (Received
in G e r m a n y
26 M a y
1989;
accepted
27 J u n e
1989)