Biomimicry designs for photoelectrochemical systems: Strategies to improve light delivery efficiency

Biomimicry designs for photoelectrochemical systems: Strategies to improve light delivery efficiency

Journal Pre-proof Biomimicry designs for photoelectrochemical systems: strategies to improve light delivery efficiency Enric Brillas, Albert Serrà, Se...

8MB Sizes 3 Downloads 55 Views

Journal Pre-proof Biomimicry designs for photoelectrochemical systems: strategies to improve light delivery efficiency Enric Brillas, Albert Serrà, Sergi Garcia-Segura PII:

S2451-9103(20)30213-1

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2020.100660

Reference:

COELEC 100660

To appear in:

Current Opinion in Electrochemistry

Received Date: 2 October 2020 Revised Date:

15 November 2020

Accepted Date: 17 November 2020

Please cite this article as: Brillas E, Serrà A, Garcia-Segura S, Biomimicry designs for photoelectrochemical systems: strategies to improve light delivery efficiency, Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2020.100660. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1

Biomimicry designs for photoelectrochemical systems:

2

strategies to improve light delivery efficiency

3

Enric Brillasa,*, Albert Serràb,**, Sergi Garcia-Segurac,**

4

a

5

Facultat de Química, Universitat de Barcelona, Martí i Franquès 1-11, 08028 Barcelona, Spain

6

b

7

Materials and Nanostructures, Feuerwerkerstrasse 39, CH-3602, Thun, Switzerland

8

c

9

Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona

of

-p

ro

Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Laboratory for Mechanics of

lP

re

Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment. School of

85287, United States

11

Jo

ur

na

10

Laboratori d’Electroquímica dels Materials i del Medi Ambient, Departament de Química Física,

Article submitted to be published in Current Opinion in Electrochemistry

12

*Corresponding author: Enric Brillas ([email protected])

13

**Albert Serrà ([email protected])

14

***Sergi Garcia-Segura ([email protected])

1

Abstract

16

In the last years, photoelectrocatalysis has been developed to offer green and sustainable application

17

to wastewater remediation, water disinfection, H2 production and CO2 reduction. The advances of

18

these systems with new semiconductor photoelectrocatalysts that are photoexcitated with visible

19

light giving photogenerated charge carriers efficiently separated in a photoelectrochemical cell, are

20

explained. These studies do not consider the light transport as fundamental aspect of light-matter

21

interaction, although the harvesting of photons at the semiconductor surface limits the quantum

22

yield by the existing semiconductor architectures. This opinion review envisages biomimicry as an

23

alternative natural guide for synthesizing more efficient photoelectrodes. Micro- and nanostructure

24

shapes

25

photoelectrochemical reactors with the light transport as indispensable element. The

26

implementation of strategies of phototroph organisms to maximize light adsorption and the

27

enhancement of photoelectrocatalytic surface area are analyzed as key factors for such bio-based

28

photoelectrodes.

29

Keywords

30

Electrochemical water treatment; water splitting; CO2 reduction; bio-based structures; bio-inspired

31

materials; photocatalysis; semiconductors

nature

are

identified

to

prepare

new

bio-inspired

photoelectrodes

for

Jo

ur

na

lP

re

-p

from

ro

of

15

2

Photoelectrocatalytic technologies for environmental applications

33

Photoelectrocatalytic (PEC) processes benefit from the synergistic hybridization of photocatalysis

34

and electrochemistry. The photocatalytic effect was initially reported in the seminal work of

35

Fujishima and Honda in 1972 [1] that quickly resulted in a highly productive line of research with

36

thousands of scientific articles published annually. Photocatalytic processes exploit the intrinsic

37

properties of semiconductor materials and their interactive response with photons. The absorption

38

of a photon of energy equal or higher to the semiconductor band gap energy (Eg) promotes the

39

ejection of an electron from the full semiconductor’s valence band (VB) to its empty conductive

40

band (CB) [2-4]. The photo-promotion of an electron to the CB (e−CB) results in the formation of a

41

positively vacancy or hole in the VB (h+VB) following reaction (1). Photogenerated e−CB and h+VB

42

are also known as charge carriers since are responsible of the electrical conductivity of

43

semiconductor materials. Both charge carrier species are highly reactive and can enable different

44

reactions of environmental interest. However, the charge separation on the semiconductor surface is

45

representative of an excited and unstable state that tends to decrease the high energy state of the

46

e−CB through the quick recombination of the photogenerated e−CB/h+VB pair by reaction (2) [5-7].

47

Semiconductor + hν

48

e−CB + h+VB

49

The low quantum yield of photocatalytic processes is indeed explained by the recombination of

50

charge carriers by reaction (2). Here, it is where electrochemical processes play a key role to ensure

51

the stabilization of the highly reactive e−CB/h+VB pair on the semiconductor surface [8-10]. The use

52

of semiconductor materials as photoelectrodes holds the promise of stabilizing charge carriers by

53

inducing their charge separation through the application of an external electric field (i.e., defined

54

bias potential or bias applied current) [11,12]. This positive effect is observed by the drastic

55

increase in PEC performance when compared to electrocatalysis or photocatalysis as individual

Jo

ur

na

lP

re

-p

ro

of

32

e−CB + h+VB

Semiconductor + heat

(1) (2)

3

processes [13,14]. The high efficiency of PEC systems and the outstanding reactivity of

57

photogenerated charge carriers on semiconductor surfaces as heterogeneous catalysts have

58

delineated different research avenues in the context of sustainable development that are summarized

59

in Figure 1.

60

First, PEC has shown promise as water treatment technology for pollutant removal and disinfection.

61

The charge carrier h+VB generates the strong oxidant hydroxyl radical (•OH) from water oxidation

62

among other oxygen reactive species [15-18]. The oxidants produced degrade organic pollutants till

63

their complete incineration to CO2 and enable bacteria inactivation mechanisms [19-24]. The low

64

cost of these processes can set us a step closer to clean water access for all.

65

Second, in the water-energy nexus PEC has demonstrated its relevance to sustain a green and

66

sustainable hydrogen economy [25,26]. PEC offers a simpler procedure for H2 sysnthesis from

67

water splitting as indirect solar energy harvesting tool [27-34]. Photogenerated charge carriers are

68

responsible of cathodic reduction of H2 at the cathode of a divided electrochemical cell. The high

69

efficiency and low energy cost of this process ensures its applicability as a more cost-effective

70

alternative route for H2 production.

71

Third, as resource recovery and climate change action. PEC processes can achieve CO2 reduction

72

into added value products such as formic acid, formaldehyde and methanol [35,36]. This process is

73

feasible in the cathode compartment of a divided cell where injected CO2 is reduced at a n-

74

semiconductor photocathode or by coupling PEC with a biocatalyst [37-42]. Capture and

75

transformation of CO2 can contribute to diminish the environmental impact of anthropogenic

76

emissions of CO2 caused from the use of fossil fuels and deforestation. That also includes different

77

existing opportunities for electrosynthesis of different products such as ammonia from nitrate

78

reduction [43,44].

79

The neglected relevance of light delivery in photoelectrochemical systems

Jo

ur

na

lP

re

-p

ro

of

56

4

PEC processes are still at their infancy. Research it is being conducted at fundamental level and at

81

low technology readiness levels. Despite of the undeniable inherent differences between the

82

ultimate goals of PEC technology applications summarized in Figure 1, these different challenges

83

have been approached with astonishingly similar research questions. Main efforts have been

84

devoted to (i) develop understanding on fundamental PEC capabilities, (ii) elucidate reaction

85

mechanisms, and (iii) achieve breakthroughs on the development of new photoelectrocatalytic

86

materials.

87

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been the gold-standard material in photocatalytic processes, with an

88

outstanding record of over 26,000 articles published on photocatalytic applications till 2020. The

89

major hindrances of TiO2 photocatalytic processes that has been discussed for decades in the

90

literature is the wide band gap of 3.2 eV that requires UV irradiation for TiO2 photocatalytic

91

activation [45-48]. This discussion was based on the reliance of energy intensive Hg-lamps as UV

92

light source. These inefficient light sources were identified as the main cost driver for PC and PEC

93

applications, but without considering life cycle assessments and the environmental impact of the use

94

of mercury as hazardous chemical. Techno-economic discussions define that the inflection point for

95

PEC competitiveness depends on the development of sunlight active photo(electro)catalysts and

96

centered major research efforts in the material discovery. This critical thought made scientist

97

worldwide set sails in a race for the searching of the holy grail of visible light-active photocatalysts.

98

Thousands of papers exploring different approaches with a trial-error strategy have resulted from

99

that effort, in which most of the times, every material reported is excellent but not benchmarked

100

against any other catalyst in terms of performance or long-term stability (meaning more than 5

101

consecutive cycles reusing the material). A large variety of semiconductor photocatalysts have been

102

prepared and checked , including halide perovskite-based materials [49,50], CdS QD-sensitized

103

BiOI/WO3 [51], hybrid cocatalysts [52], metal-organic frameworks [53,54], Cu2O [55,56], iron-

104

based materials [57,58], inorganic graphitic, graphene and related compounds [59-64], MoS2 [65]

Jo

ur

na

lP

re

-p

ro

of

80

5

and g-C3N4-based materials [66,67]. Being honest, despite of its relevance, this scientific race may

106

have blinded our sight and distracted all of us from other relevant aspects that should be considered

107

for technology translation.

108

The recent addition of light-emitting diodes to the light-driven technologies toolbox has brought

109

monochromatic, alternative non-energy intensive, and mercury-free light sources into play.

110

Therefore, in an exercise of honesty we should agree upon the fact that photon source may not be a

111

major hindrance after all for certain applications such as water treatment or CO2 reduction. Until

112

reaching to that conclusion, we may have focused too much on the semiconductor material

113

composition (e.g., doping, nanodecoration, composites, etc.) and completely neglected the other

114

relevant aspect of PEC systems: the light delivery. Evaluation of PEC efficiency entails the

115

effective use of photons delivered from the light source. Light transport is of major relevance for

116

competitive operation of PEC technologies of any kind. In fact, at this point in the game we realize

117

that we have not designed light transport frameworks that can be deployed or scaled-up in

118

photoelectrochemical reactors.

119

Biomimicry strategies to improve light delivery in photoelectrochemical systems

120

Biomimicry identifies strategies in nature to solve problems in human design. Because organisms

121

have developed highly evolved structures while surviving eons as the most competitive specimens

122

following natural selection, already refined knowledge from observing and emulating nature’s

123

optimal shapes and ecosystems can inspire the smart design of more effective materials [68-71]. As

124

such, biomimicry will play a major role in developing optimized semiconductor architectures and at

125

PEC systems level for improved light harvesting and use [72].

126

In particular, the synthesis and design of photoelectrodes should seek smart sophisticated

127

architectures and strategies among insects, plants, algae, and photosynthetic bacteria. These

128

organisms’ anatomical features can reduce reflection or maximize cooperative light-harvesting

129

mechanisms and exploit unique nanoscale effects to improve selectivity towards target species in

Jo

ur

na

lP

re

-p

ro

of

105

6

low concentration in water matrices [72-76]. In the process, the biomimetic design of innovative

131

materials and systems for improved light harvesting should be based on developing antireflective

132

surfaces (Figure 2a) in front of hierarchical micro- and nanoscale architectures (Figure 2b) and/or

133

macrostructures (Figure 2c) to facilitate light trapping [72].

134

Many insects present optimized optical structures to improve their ability to attract mates and

135

camouflage themselves. Such intricate surface architectures (e.g., moth eyes and butterfly wings)

136

are based on a subwavelength diffraction grating mechanism, which results in minimum light

137

reflection (Figure 2a). In the past two decades, significant efforts have been made to fabricate

138

antireflective coatings based on the integration of tapered shapes such as cones, pillars and columns

139

(Figure 3a), primarily inspired by moth eyes and butterfly wings [73,74]. In fact, those antireflective

140

coatings are commonly called “moth-eye structures”. For example, the antireflective properties of

141

month-eye TiO2 nanostructured films improved light-harvesting efficiency in perovskite solar cells

142

– the power conversion efficiency was improved by approximately 11% (Figure 3a) [76].

143

Plants and other photosynthetic organisms evolved to maximize their energy production via

144

photosynthesis process. These organisms mastered the secrets of highly efficient photon harvesting.

145

PEC is a heterogeneous catalytic process, which means that available surface is crucial for any final

146

application of PEC technologies (Figure 1). However, available surface it is not only relevant in

147

terms of reactive sites but also is required for photon absorption. The depth penetration of photons

148

interacting with a semiconductor surface is defined in function of 1/α [75,76], where α is the

149

absorption coefficient of the semiconductor at a given wavelength. The maximum depletion layer

150

defines the light penetration, which have already justified the relevance of nanostructured materials

151

for enhanced photoexcitation performance defined by the quantum yield. Thus, it is not a matter of

152

enhancing JM available surface area but more of shaping architectures that enhance photons capture.

153

This was observed in a recent work that explored different synthetic approaches of ZnO

154

nanorods.[77]. Disorganized structures with crisscrossed nanorods decreased photoelectrode surface

Jo

ur

na

lP

re

-p

ro

of

130

7

efficiently exposed to irradiation, thus diminishing PEC performance and quantum yield when

156

compared to hierarchically organized structures. Flexible, hierarchical, fractal micro- and nanoscale

157

architectures as well as efficient trapping mechanisms have been partly optimized, but biomimicry

158

can translate these designs to a higher level of performance.

159

Bio-inspired designs based on natural hierarchical architectures (e.g., fern leaves, green leaves, and

160

cacti) exhibit excellent multilevel light scattering, long electron-diffusion, open and accessible

161

pores, high surface-to-volume ratios, and high light absorption independent of the incident light

162

angle. For example, bioinspired ZnO microferns (Figure 3b) [78] exhibit improved light-harvesting

163

properties independent of that angle compared to ZnO nanorods or nanowires, while the porous

164

morphology of N-doped ZnO photocatalysts (Figure 3c) [79], inspired on green leaves, increases

165

light absorption up to 131%. From that perspective, complex bio-inspired architectures demonstrate

166

to be more efficient and smart designs for harvesting light.

167

Another common means to improve light harvesting is mimicking the phototropic mechanism of

168

sunflowers (i.e., self-orientation toward the sun throughout the day). Following that strategy,

169

human-made omnidirectional trackers have exhibited improvement in solar energy-harvesting up to

170

400% compared with non-phototropic materials (Figure 4) [80].

171

nanostructured stimuli-responsive polymers that are able to align to the incident light direction in

172

the three-dimensions. This strategy can be extended to many responsive materials and stimuli.

173

Conclusions and key insights

174

Photoelectrocatalytic technologies provide a wide range of sustainable applications that are key in

175

the transition to a green society. During the last decade, researchers have focused on the

176

development of new photoelectrocatalyst excitable under visible light. Fundamental knowledge and

177

advance on advanced materials has have been gigantic but have neglected one of the two aspects

178

involved in the material-light interaction: the light transport. Photoelectrocatalytic efficiency is

179

tightly related to the efficient harvesting of photons at the semiconductor surfaces. Existing material

Jo

ur

na

lP

re

-p

ro

of

155

This system is based on

8

architectures may be limited on their photon capture capabilities which affects overall quantum

181

yields. Biomimicry holds the potential to guide technology advancements to a next generation of

182

more efficient and smart photoelectrodes. Emulating nature’s optimal shapes at the micro- and

183

nanostructure is identified as the new challenge to ensure translation of to higher technology

184

readiness level, in which electrochemical reactor designs and photoelectrodes consider the

185

relevance of light transport as indispensable element of photoelectrocatalytic systems. New

186

electrode architectures must consider and implement strategies of phototroph organisms to

187

maximize light usage while increasing photoelectrocatalytic surface area.

188

Acknowledgements

189

This work was partially funded by the National Science Foundation (EEC-1449500) Nanosystems

190

Engineering Research Center on Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment

191

References

192

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

193

•Paper of special interest

194

••Paper of outstanding interest

195

1.

Jo

ur

na

lP

re

-p

ro

of

180

Fujishika A, Honda K: Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode.

196

Nature 1972, 238:37-38. Doi: 10.1038/238037a0

197

••This is the seminal work that described for the very first time the photoelectrocatalytic

198

effect.

199

2.

Garcia-Segura, S, Brillas E: Applied photoelectrocatalysis on the degradation of organic

200

pollutants in wastewaters. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 2017, 31:1-35. Doi:

201

10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2017.01.005

202

••This is a comprehensive and critical text of reference regarding photoelectrocatalytic

203

principles and application in water treatment. 9

204

3.

Tugaoen HON, Garcia-Segura S, Hristovski K, Westerhoff P: Compact light-emitting diode

205

optical fiber immobilized TiO2 reactor for photocatalytic water treatment. Sci Total Environ

206

2018, 613:1331-1338. Doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.242

207

4.

Marcelino RBP, Amorim CC: Towards visible-light photocatalysis for environmental

208

applications: band-gap engineering versus photons absorption – a review. Environ Sci Pollut

209

Res 2019. 26:4155-4170. Doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3117-5 5.

212

treatment. Acc Chem Res 2019, 52:906-915. Doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00642 6.

of

211

Heck KN, Garcia-Segura S, Westerhoff P, Wong MS: Catalytic converters for water

Serrà A, Philippe P, Perreault F, Garcia-Segura S: Photocatalytic treatment of natural waters.

ro

210

Reality or hype? The case of cyanotoxins remediation. Water Res 2021, 188:116543. Doi:

214

10.1016/j.watres.2020.116543

re

7.

Fagan R, McCormack DE, Dionysiou DD, Pillai SC: A review of solar and visible light active

lP

215

-p

213

TiO2 photocatalysis for treating bacteria, cyanotoxins and contaminants of emerging concern.

217

Mar Sci Semicon Proc 2016, 42:2-14. Doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2015.07.052 8.

Garcia-Segura S, Tugaoen HON, Hristovski K, Westerhoff P: Photon flux influence on

ur

218

na

216

photoelectrochemical water treatment. Electrochem Commun 2018, 87:63-65. Doi:

220

10.1016/j.elecom.2017.12.026

221

Jo

219

9.

Feng K, Lin Y, Guo J, Ye Z, Zhang Y, Ma Q, Shao Y, Chen K, Zhuang J, Lin D, Lin T: Study

222

on the enhanced electron-hole separation capability of IrxZn1-xO/Ti electrodes with high

223

photoelectrocatalysis

224

10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122488

225

10.

efficiency.

J

Hazard

Mater

2020,

393:122488.

Doi:

Zhang Y, Hu H, Kang W, Qiu G, Liang R, Deng L, Yuan H: Enhancing hydrogen evolution

226

by photoelectrocatalysis of water splitting over a CdS flowers-loaded TiO2 nanotube array

227

film

228

10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.062

on

the

Ti

foil

substrate.

Ceram

Int

2020,

46:176060-17613.

Doi:

10

229

11.

Umukoro EH, Kumar N, Ngila JC, Arotiba OA: Expanded graphite supported p-n MoS2-SnO2

230

heterojunction nanocomposite electrode for enhanced photo-electrocatalytic degradation of a

231

pharmaceutical

232

10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.09.027

233

12.

pollutant.

J

Electroanal

Chem

2018,

827:193-203.

Doi:

Bessegato GG, Almeida LC, Ferreira SLC, Zanoni MVB: Experimental design as a tool for

234

parameter optimization of photoelectrocatalytic degradation of a textile dye. J Environ Chem

235

Eng 2019, 7:103264. Doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103264 13.

Orimolade BE, Zwane BN, Koiki BA, Tshwenya L, Peleyeju GM, Mabuba N, Zhou M,

of

236

Arotiba OA: Solar photoelectrocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin at a FTO/BiVO4/MnO2

238

anode: Kinetics, intermediate products and degradation pathway studies. J Environ Chem Eng

239

2020, 8:103607. Doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103607

-p

re

14.

Cardoso JC, Bessegato GG, Zanoni MVB: Efficiency comparison of ozonation, photolysis,

lP

240

ro

237

photocatalysis and photoelectrocatalysis methods in real textile wastewater decolorization.

242

Water Res 2016, 98, 39-46. Doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.04.004 15.

Garcia-Segura S, Dosta S, Guilemany JM, Brillas E: Solar photoelectrocatalytic degradation

ur

243

na

241

of Acid Orange 7 azo dye using a highly stable TiO2 photoanode synthesized by atmospheric

245

plasma

246

10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.11.037

247

16.

Jo

244

spray.

Appl

Catal

B:

Environ

2013,

132-133:142-150.

Doi:

Roselló-Márquez G, Fernández-Domene RM, Sánchez-Tovar R, García-Carrión S, Lucas-

248

Granados B, García-Antón J: Photoelectrocatalyzed degradation of a pesticides mixture

249

solution (chlorfenvinphos and bromacil) by WO3 nanosheets. Sci Total Environ 2019, 674:88-

250

95. Doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.150

251

17.

Jaramillo-Gutierrez MI, Carreño-Lizcano MI, Ruiz-Lizarazo JO, Pedraza-Avella JA, Rivero

252

EP, Cruz-Diaz MR.: Design, mathematical modelling, and numerical simulation of a novel

253

tubular photoelectrochemical reactor and experimental validation by residence time

11

254

distribution and mass transfer coefficients. Chem Eng J 2020, 386:123895. Doi:

255

10.1016/j.cej.2019.123895

256

•This is an excellent article on photoelectrocatalytic reactor modelling and understanding.

257

18.

Liang F, Zhu Y: Enhancement of mineralization ability for phenol via synergetic effect of

258

photoelectrocatalysis of g-C3N4 film. Appl Catal B: Environ 2016, 180:324-329. Doi:

259

10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.009

260

19.

Bessegato GG, Guaraldo TT, de Brito JF, Brugnera MF, Zanoni MVB: Achievements and trends in photoelectrocatalysis: from environmental to energy applications. Electrocatalysis

262

2015, 6:415-441. Doi: 10.1007/s12678-015-0259-9

263

•This contribution describes wide applications of PEC systems.

ro

-p

20.

Montenegro-Ayo R, Barrios AC, Mondal I, Bhagat K, Morales-Gomero JC, Abbaszadegan

re

264

of

261

M, Westerhoff P, Perreault F, Garcia-Segura S: Portable point-of-use photoelectrocatalytic

266

device provides rapid water disinfection. Sci Total Environ 2020, 737:140044. Doi:

267

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140044

268

••This article is a nice example of an scaled-down application of PEC. Reports an autonomous

269

device for water disinfection as point of use technology.

na

ur

21.

Jo

270

lP

265

Arotiba OA, Orimolade BO, Koiki BA: Visible light-driven photoelectrocatalytic

271

semiconductor heterojunction anodes for water treatment applications. Curr Opinion

272

Electrochem 2020, 22:25-34. Doi: 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.03.018

273

•This article summarizes advances on visible light photocatalysis.

274

22.

Mousset E, Dionysiou DD: Photoelectrochemical reactors for treatment of water and

275

wastewater: a review. Environ Chem Lett 2020, 18:1301-1318. Doi: 10.1007/s10311-020-

276

01014-9

12

277

23.

Carreño-Lizcano MI, Gualdrón-Reyes AF, Rodríguez-González V, Pedraza-Avella, JA, Niño-

278

Gómez, ME: Photoelectrocatalytic phenol oxidation employing nitrogen doped TiO2-rGO

279

films as photoanodes. Catal Today 2020, 341:96-103. Doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2019.02.006

280

24.

Daghrir R, Drogui P, Ka I, El Khakani MA: Photoelectrocatalytic degradation of

281

chlortetracycline using Ti/TiO2 nanostructured electrodes deposited by means of a Pulsed

282

Laser

283

10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.022 25.

process.

J

Hazard

Mater

2012,

199-200:15-24.

Doi:

Gao Y, Zhang S, Bu X, Tian Y: Surface defect engineering via acid treatment improving

of

284

Deposition

photoelectrocatalysis of β-In2S3 nanoplates for water splitting. Catal Today 2019, 327:271-

286

278. Doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.04.039

-p

26.

Yaw CS, Ruan Q, Tang J, Soh AK, Chong MN: A Type II n-n staggered orthorhombic

re

287

ro

285

V2O5/monoclinic clinobisvanite BiVO4 heterojunction photoanode for photoelectrochemical

289

water oxidation: Fabrication, characterisation and experimental validation. Chem Eng J 2014,

290

364:177-185. Doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.179

292 293

na

Chandrasekaran S, Nann T, Voelcker NH: Nanostructured silicon photoelectrodes for solar

ur

27.

water electrolysis. Nano Energy 2015, 17:308-322. Doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.08.022 28.

Jo

291

lP

288

Ge M, Cai J, Iocozzia J, Cao C, Huang J, Zhang X, Shen J, Wang S, Zhang S, Zhang K-Q,

294

Lai Y, Lin Z: A review of TiO2 nanostructured catalysts for sustainable H2 generation. Int J

295

Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42:8418-8449. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.052

296

29.

Phuan YW, Ong W-J, NanChong M, Ocon JD: Prospects of electrochemically synthesized

297

hematite photoanodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting: a review. J Photochem

298

Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 2017, 33:54-82. Doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2017.10.001

299

••This article provides a perspective on the use of iron-based photoelectrodes for water

300

splitting.

13

301

30.

Li A, Sun Y, Yao T, Han H: Earth-abundant transition-metal-based electrocatalysts for water

302

electrolysis to produce renewable hydrogen. Chem-A Europ J 2018, 24:18334-18355. Doi:

303

10.1002/chem.201803749

304

•This article provides a perspective on the use of iron-based photoelectrodes for water

305

splitting.

306

31.

Yao T, An X, Han H, Chen JQ, Li C: Photoelectrocatalytic materials for solar water splitting. Adv Energy Mater 2018, 8. Doi: 10.1002/aenm.201800210

308

••This is a thorough review on the application of PEC systems for H2 generation.

310

for

311

10.1016/j.cattod.2019.01.067 33.

solar

water

splitting.

Catal

Today

2019,

335:31-38.

Doi:

Ali M, Pervaiz E, Noor T, Rabi O, Zahra R, Yang M: Recent advancements in MOF-based

lP

312

efficient

ro

Wang Z, Huang X, Wang X: Recent progresses in the design of BiVO4-based photocatalysts

-p

32.

re

309

of

307

catalysts for applications in electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting. A

314

review. Int J Energy Res 2020. Doi: 10.1002/er.5807 34.

Yu X, Han X, Zhao Z, Zhang J, Guo W, Pan C, Li A, Liu H, Wang ZL: Hierarchical TiO2

ur

315

na

313

nanowire/graphite fiber photoelectrocatalysis setup powered by a wind-driven nanogenerator:

317

A highly efficient photoelectrocatalytic device entirely based on renewable energy. Nano

318

Ener 2015, 11:19-27. Doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.09.024

319

Jo

316

35.

Brito JF, Perini JAL, Perathoner S, Zanoni MVB: Turning carbon dioxide into fuel

320

concomitantly to the photoanode-driven process of organic pollutant degradation by

321

photoelectrocatalysis.

322

10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.134

323 324

36.

Electrochim

Acta

2019,

306:277-284.

Doi:

Cardoso JC, Stulp S, Brito JF, Flor JBS, Frem RCG, Zanoni MVB: MOFs based on ZIF-8 deposited on TiO2 nanotubes increase the surface adsorption of CO2 and its

14

325

photoelectrocatalytic reduction to alcohols in aqueous media. Appl Catal B: Environ 2018,

326

225:563-573. Doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.013

327

37.

Zhao G, Huang X, Wang X, Wang X: Progress in catalyst exploration for heterogeneous CO2

328

reduction and utilization: a critical review. J Mater Chem A 2017, 5:21625-21649. Doi:

329

10.1039/c7ta07290b 38.

331 332

Castro S, Albo J, Irabien A: Photoelectrochemical reactors for CO2 utilization. ACS Sust Chem Eng 2018, 6:15877-15894. Doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03706

39.

Wang Y, He D, Chen H, Wang D. Catalysts in electro-, photo- and photoelectrocatalytic CO2

of

330

reduction reactions. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 2019, 40:117-149. Doi:

334

10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2019.02.002

-p

40.

Aranda-Aguirre A, Ojeda J, de Brito JF, Garcia-Segura S, Zanoni MVB, Alarcon H:

re

335

ro

333

Photoelectrodes of Cu2O with interfacial structure of topological insulator Bi2Se3 contributes

337

to selective photoelectrocatalytic reduction of CO2 towards methanol. J CO2 Util 2020,

338

39:101154. Doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2020.101154

na

41.

Ichikawa S, Doi R: Hydrogen production from water and conversion of carbon dioxide to

ur

339

lP

336

useful chemicals by room temperature photoelectrocatalysis. Catal Today 1996, 27:271-277.

341

Doi: 10.1016/0920-5861(95)00198-0

342

Jo

340

42.

Xu L, Xiu Y, Liu F, Liang Y, Wang S: Research progress in conversion of CO2 to valuable

343

fuels. Molecules 2020, 25:3653. Doi: 10.3390/molecules2516353

344

•Nice overview on the advances of CO2 conversion.

345 43. Wang H, Turner JA: Photoelectrochemical reduction of nitrates at the illuminated p-GaInP2 346 347

photoelectrode. Energy Environ Sci 2013, 6:1802-1805. Doi: 10.1039/c3ee40745d 44.

Doudrick K, Yang t, Hristovski K, Westerhoff P: Photocatalytic nitrate reduction in water:

348

Managing the hole scavenger and reaction by-product selectivity. Appl Catal B: Environ

349

2013, 136-137:40-47. Doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.01.042

15

350

45.

Ge M-Z, Cao C-Y, Huang J-Y, Li S-H, Zhang S-N, Deng S, Li QS, Zhang KQ, Lai YK:

351

Synthesis, modification, and photo/photoelectrocatalytic degradation applications of TiO2

352

nanotube arrays: a review. Nanotechnol Rev 2016, 5:75-112. Doi: 1515/ntrev-2015-0049

353

••Complete revision on TiO2 photoelectrocatalysis.

354

46.

Ding Y, Yang IS, Li Z, Xia X, Lee WI, Dai S, Bahnemann DW, Pan JH: Nanoporous TiO2

355

spheres with tailored textural properties: Controllable synthesis, formation mechanism, and

356

photochemical

357

10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100620

Mater

Sci

2020,

109:100620.

Doi:

of

47.

Progress

Feng Y, Rijnaarts HHM, Yntema D, Gong Z, Dionysiou DD, Cao Z, Miao S, Chen Y, Ye Y,

ro

358

applications.

Wang Y: Applications of anodized TiO2 nanotube arrays on the removal of aqueous

360

contaminants of emerging concern: A review. Water Res 2020, 186:116327. Doi:

361

10.1016/j.watres.2020.116327

re

lP

48.

Sequeda-Pico IN, Joya-Herrera LM, Melendez am, Ospina RO, Martinez JAH, Niño-Gomez

na

362

-p

359

ME: Enhanced photoelectrochemical performance of iron and carbon self-doped TiO2

364

photoanodes modified with nitrogen. Thin Solid Films 2018, 653:326-332. Doi:

365

10.1016/j.tsf.2018.03.059 49.

367 368

Jo

366

ur

363

Singh M, Sinha I: Halide perovskite-based photocatalysis systems for solar-driven fuel generation. Solar Energy 2020, 208:296-311. Doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.08.007

50.

Chen D, Lu Y, Wu J, Li N, Zheng Y, Tao X: Perovskite solar cells-TiO2 tandem assembly for

369

photoelectrocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. J Phys Chem Solids 2019, 132:204-

370

212. Doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.03.025

371

51.

Bi Q, Gao Y, Wang Z, Dang C, Zhang Z, Wang L, Xue J: Preparation of a direct Z-scheme

372

thin-film electrode based on CdS QD-sensitized BiOI/WO3 and its photoelectrocatalytic

373

performance. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 2020, 599: 124849. Doi:

374

10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124849

16

375

52.

Zhon S, Xi Y, Wu S, Liu Q, Zhao L, Bai S: Hybrid cocatalysts in semiconductor-based

376

photocatalysis and photoelectrocatalysis. J Mater Chem A 2020, 8:14863-14894. Doi:

377

10.1039/d0ta04977h

378

53.

Mu F, Dai B, Zhao W, Zhang L, Xu J, Guo X: A review on metal-organic frameworks for

379

photoelectrocatalytic

380

10.1016/j.cclet.2019.12.015

381

54.

applications.

Chinese

Chem

Lett

2020,

31:1773-1781.

Doi:

Zahran ZN, Tsubonouchi Y, Mohamed EA, Yagi M: Recent advances in the development of molecular catalyst-based anodes for water oxidation toward artificial photosynthesis.

383

ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 1775-1793. Doi: 10.1002/cssc.201802795

ro

55.

Toe CY, Scott J, Amal R, Ng YH: Recent advances in suppressing the photocorrosion of

-p

384

of

382

cuprous oxide for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical energy conversion. J Photochem

386

Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 2019, 40:191-211. Doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2018.10.001

lP

56.

Koiki BA, Orimolade BO, Zwane BN, Nkosi D, Mabuba N, Arotiba OA: Cu2O on anodised

na

387

re

385

388

TiO2 nanotube arrays: A heterojunction photoanode for visible light assisted electrochemical

389

degradation

390

Doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2020.135944 57.

ur

pharmaceuticals

in

water.

Electrochim

Acta

2020,

340:135944.

Jo

391

of

AlSalka Y, Granone LI, Ramadan W, Hakki A, Dillert, R, Bahnemann DW: Iron-based

392

photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic nano-structures: facts, perspectives, and expectations.

393

Appl Catal B: Environ 2019, 244:1095-2019. Doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.014

394

58.

Phuan YW, Chong MN, Ocon JD, Chan ES: A novel ternary nanostructured carbonaceous-

395

metal-semiconductor eRGO/NiO/α-Fe2O3 heterojunction photoanode with enhanced charge

396

transfer properties for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 2017,

397

169:236-244. Doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.028

398 399

59.

Ozer LY, Garlisi C, Oladipo, H, Pagliaro, M, Sharief SA, Yusuf A, Almheiri S, Palmisano G: Inorganic

semiconductors-graphene

composites

in

photo(electro)catalysis:

synthetic

17

400

strategies, interaction mechanisms and applications. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem

401

Rev 2017, 33:132-164. Doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2017.06.003

402

60.

403 404

photoelectrocatalysis. J. Mater Chem A 2017, 5:16522-16536. Doi: 10.1039/c7ta04045h 61.

405 406

García A, Fernandez-Blanco C, Herance JR, Albero J. García H: Graphenes as additives in

Meng X, Zhang Z: Two dimensional graphitic materials for photoelectrocatalysis: a short review. Catal Today 2018, 315:2-8. Doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.03.015

62.

Zeng Z, Chen S, Tan TTY, Xiao FX: Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) and its derivatives for multifarious photocatalysis and photoelectrocatalysis. Catal Today 2018, 315:171-183. Doi:

408

10.1016/j.cattod.2018.01.005

ro

63.

Zhang J-B, Xu J-L, Zhang B, Feng YQ: Graphyne and modified graphyne in the fields of

-p

409

of

407

photoelectrocatalysis and photovoltaics. Acta Polym Sinica 2019, 50: 1239-1252. Doi:

411

10.11777/j.issn1000-3304.2019.19153

Wen J, Xie J, Chen X, Li X: A review on g-C3N4-based photocatalysts. Appl Surf Sci 2017,

ur

65.

415 416

lP

MoS2. J. Mater Chem A 2018, 6:23932-23977. Doi: 10.1039/c8ta08152b

413 414

Shi S, Sun Z, Hu YH: Synthesis, stabilization and applications of 2-dimensional 1T metallic

na

64.

391:72-123. Doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.030 66.

Jo

412

re

410

Yu F, Wang Y, Ma H, Dong G: Enhancing the yield of hydrogen peroxide and phenol

417

degradation via a synergistic effect of photoelectrocatalysis using a g-C3N4/ACF electrode. Int

418

J Hydrogen Ener 2018, 43:19500-19509. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.217

419

67.

Serrà A, Pip P, Gómez E, Philippe P: Efficient magnetic hybrid ZnO-based photocatalysts for

420

visible-light-driven removal of toxic cyanobacteria blooms and cyanotoxins. Appl Catal B:

421

Environ 2020, 285:118745. Doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118745

422 423

68.

Serrà A, Artal R, García-Amorós J, Sepúlveda B, Gómez E, Nogués J, Philippe L: Hybrid Ni@ZnO@ZnS-microalgae for circular economy: A smart route to the efficient integration of

18

424

solar photocatalytic water decontamination and bioethanol production. Adv Sci 2020,

425

7:1902447. Doi: 10.1002/advs.201902447

426

69.

Serrà A, Zhang Y, Sepúlveda B, Gómez E, Nogués J, Michler J, Philippe L: Highly reduced

427

ecotoxicity of ZnO-based micro/nanostructures on aqueous biota: Influence of architecture,

428

chemical composition, fixation, and photocatalytic efficiency. Water Res 2020, 169:115210.

429

Doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115210

430

70.

Garcia-Segura S, Qu X, Alvarez PJJ, Chaplin BP, Chen W, Crittenden JC, Feng Y, Gao G, He Z, Hou C-H, Hu X, Jiang G, Kim J-H, Li J, Li Q, Ma J, Ma J, Nienhauser AB, Niu J, Pan B,

432

Quan X, Ronzani F, Villagran D, Waite TD, Walker WS, Wang C, Wong M, Westerhoff P:

433

Opportunities for nanotechnology to enhance electrochemical treatment of pollutants in

434

potable water and industrial wastewater–a perspective. Environ Sci: Nano 2020, 7:2178-2194.

435

Doi: 10.1039/d0en00194e

436

••Perspective

437

electrochemical performance. Special attentions should be driven to the eisenhower matrix

438

and the identification of urgent priorities including the exploration of nanostructure

439

architectures.

ro

lP

re

-p

71.

ur

na

article that discusses opportunities of nanotechnology to improve

Jo

440

of

431

Garcia-Segura S, Nienhauser AB, Fajardo AS, Bansal R, Coonrod CL, Fortner JD, Marcos-

441

Hernández M, Rogers T, Villagran D, Wong MS, Westerhoff P: Disparities between

442

experimental and environmental conditions: Research steps toward making electrochemical

443

water

444

10.1016/j.coelec.2020.03.001

445 446

72.

treatment

a

reality.

Curr

Opinion

Electrochem

2020,

22:9-16.

Doi:

Soudi N, Nanayakkara S, Jahed NMS, Naahidi S: Rise of nature-inspired solar photovoltaic energy convertors. Solar energy 20200, 208:31-35. Doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.07.048

19

447

73.

Han ZW, Wang Z, Feng XM, Li B, Mu ZZ, Zhang JO, NiuL SC, Ren O: Antireflective

448

surface inspired from biology: a review. Biosurf Biotribol 2016, 2:137-150. Doi:

449

10.1016/j.bsbt.2016.11.002

450

74.

Kan SM, Jang S, Lee J-K, Yoon J, Yoo D-E, Lee J-W, Choi M, Park N-G: Moth eye TiO2

451

layer or improving light harvesting efficiency in perovskite solar cells. Small 2016, 12:2443-

452

2449. Doi: 10.1002/smll.20160042

453

75.

Dosta S, Robotti M, Garcia-Segura S, Brillas E, Cano IG, Guilemany JM: Influence of atmospheric plasma spraying on the solar photoelectro-catalytic properties of TiO2 coatings.

455

Appl Catal B: Environ 2016, 189:151-159. Doi: 0.1016/j.apcatb.2016.02.048

ro

76.

Hitchman ML, Tian F: Studies of TiO2 thin films prepared by chemical vapour deposition for

-p

456

of

454

photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol. J Electroanal Chem

458

2002, 538-539:165–172. Doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(02)01252-4

459

•Excellent

77.

lP

description of light penetration in semiconductors for their photoexcitation.

Cerrón-Calle

GA,

na

460

re

457

Aranda-Aguirre

AJ,

Luyo

C,

Garcia-Segura

S,

Alarcón

H.

Photoelectrocatalytic decolorization of azo dyes with nano-composite oxide layers of ZnO

462

nanorods decorated with Ag nanoparticles. Chemosphere 2019, 219:296-304. Doi:

463

10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.003

464

••This article demonstrates the relevance of hierarchical order of nanostructures on the light

465

delivery.

466

Jo

ur

461

78.

Serrà A, Zhang Y, Sepúlveda B, Gómez E, Nogués J, Michler J, Philippe L: Highly active

467

ZnO-based biomimetic fern-like microleaves for photocatalytic water decontamination using

468

sunlight. Appl Catal B: Environ 2019, 248:129-146. Doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.02.017

469

••This article provides a perspective on the use of bioinspired microferns for improving light

470

harvesting.

20

471

79.

Zhou H, Fan T, Li X, Zhang D, Guo Q, Ogawa H: Biomimetic photocatalyst system derived

472

from the natural prototype in leaves for efficient visible-light-driven catalysis. J Mater Chem

473

2009, 19:2695-2703 Doi: 10.1039/B818395C

474

80.

Qian X, Zhao Y, Alsaid Y, Wang X, Hua M, Galy T, Gopalakrishna H, Yang Y, Cui J, Liu N, Marszewski M, Pilon L, Jiang H, He X: Artificial phototropism for omnidirectional

476

tracking and harvesting of light. Nature Nanotechnol 2019, 14:1048-1055. Doi:

477

10.1038/s41565-019-0562-3

Jo

ur

na

lP

re

-p

ro

of

475

21

of ro -p re lP na ur Jo Figure 1: Utilization of photoelectrocatalysis for sustainable and green economic development.

22

of ro -p re lP na ur Jo

Figure 2: Schematic representation of light interaction with (a) subwavelength diffraction grating, (b) hierarchical micro- and nanoscale architectures, and (c) macrostructures. Adapted with permission from [72].

23

of ro -p re lP na ur Jo Figure 3: (a) Optical and FE-SEM micrographs of corneal nipple arrays of peacock butterfly and moth‐eye patterned mp‐TiO2 layer. Adapted with permission from [73] and [74]. (b) Schematic representation of microfern leaf and FE-SEM micrographs of ZnO-based microferns. Scale bar: 5 mm. Adapted with permission from [78]. (c) Characterization of original Cinnamomum camphora leaf from macroscale to nanoscale and FE-SEM micrographs of artificial N-doped ZnO Cinnamomum camphora leaf. Adapted with permission from [79]. 24

of ro -p re lP na ur Jo Figure 4: (a) Schematic representation of phototropism mechanism of sunflowers and human-made omnidirectional trackers. (b) Schematic representation and (c) photos of human-made omnidirectional trackers immersed in water. (d, e) Optical micrographs of human-made omnidirectional tracker(s) in water aiming at a laser that illuminates from various zenith angles. Adapted with permission from [80].

25

Declaration of interests ☒ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Jo

ur

na

lP

re

-p

ro

of

☐The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: