Biplane apex echocardiography versus biplane cineangiography in the assessment of left ventricular volume and function: Validation by direct measurements

Biplane apex echocardiography versus biplane cineangiography in the assessment of left ventricular volume and function: Validation by direct measurements

ABSTRACTS BIPLANE APEX ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY VERSUS BIPLANE CINEANGIOGRAPHY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF LEFT VENTRICULAR VOLUME AND VALIDATION BY DIRECT MEASUREM...

140KB Sizes 5 Downloads 58 Views

ABSTRACTS

BIPLANE APEX ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY VERSUS BIPLANE CINEANGIOGRAPHY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF LEFT VENTRICULAR VOLUME AND VALIDATION BY DIRECT MEASUREMENTS FUNCTION: William Bonnner, MD, FACC; Tam Chun; Oi Ling Kwan, BS; Alexander Neumann, BS; Dean T. Mason, MD, FACC; Anthony N. DeMaria, MD, FACC, University of California, Davis, CA. No data are available comparing the accuracy of cineangiography (Cine) and Z-dimensional echocardiography(2DE) against direct measurements in the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) volume and function. Therefore, we obtained measurements of volume in 18 human LV casts and 2 contracting heart models by 2DE, tine, and water displacement; while LV shortening was assessed by 2DE, tine, and motion photography in the contracting heart models. Estimates of volume and function by 2DE and tine were also compared in 20 pts. Comparable biplane 2DE and angulated tine and optical images were outlined and volumes were calculated using Simpson's Rule. Actual LV cast volumes correlated closely with those values obtained by Comparisons between actual both 2DE and tine (r=.97). measurements and 2DE and tine estimates for the models and patients were made by computing the following correlation coefficients: Segmental Ejection LV Stroke Shortening Fraction LV-models Volume Volume --~ .99 .96 2DE vs actual .97 .98 .97 .99 tine vs actual .97 .97 .98 .96 ZOE vs tine .97 .96 LV-patients .84 2DE vs tine .80 .80 Thus, in LV casts and contracting models, biplane apical 2DE predicts LV volume and function with comparable The reduced correlation between accuracy to LV tine. biplane apical 2DE and tine in patients may be related to measurement errors referrable to either method.

A PRACTICAL TWO-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC MODEL TO ASSESS VOLUME IN THE ISCHEMIC LEFT VENTRICLE Pascal Gueret, MD; HL Wyatt, PhD; Samuel Meerbaum, PhD, FACC; Eliot Corday, MD, FACC, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif. Most techniques currently available for left ventricular volume (LVV) quantification do not adequately account for regional myocardial dyssynergy (DYS). Previous in vitro studies show that 2-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) may account for LV-asymmetry when short-axis areas (A) are utilized for reconstruction. The present in vivo study was designed to test 2DE short-axis models for LVV versus single plane cineangiography before and after proximal left anterior descending intracoronary balloon occlusion (0). In 11 closed chest dogs, LVV at end-diastole (EDV) and at end-systole (ESV) were quantified and ejection fraction (EF) calculated in control and during regional ischemia. Simpson's reconstruction using A from 5 LV short-axis levels and LV length (L) showed good LVV correlations before and after 0 (r from .89 to .92). A simplified formula (LVV=5/6 AL) utilized A from either the mitral valve level area (MV-A) proximal to 0 or the mid-papillary level area (MP-A) distal to 0; correlation coefficients for EDV, ESV and EF were (*=nonsignificant): MV-A MP-A EDV ESV EDV ESV EF CONTROL .97 .:: .95 *El .89 .84 LAD-O .9D .56* .60* .82 .87 .92 In control, good results were observed using either MV-A or MP-A. With pronounced systolic DYS due to 0, results were poor for ESV and EF using MV-A, but were satisfactory using MP-A (pc.001). EDV correlated well in 0 as well as in control. CONCLUSION: In dogs with ischemic myocardium, LVV in vivo may be satisfactorily assessed by 2DE using either multiple short-axis section analysis or a clinically applicable simplifed formula, 5/6 AL if the section-A is from the zone of LV asymmetry.

THREE-DIMENSIONAL DISPLAY AND VOLUME DETERMINATION OF THE LEFT VENTRICLE BY TWO-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY Keiko Ueda,MD; Keiichi Kuwaki, MD; Kiyoshi Inoue, MD; Tokyo

Metropolitan

Using

a

lnd.,

Model

new

(Toshiba, (2DE),

we

apical to

the

images

usuallv

area

system

of was

the

Extremely method

Accurate

from

these

non-invasively

for by

and

good was

whole serial

area

the

LV

patients

olanimetered

new

this LV

area-length

trans-

method

cavitv

was

and

with

a

light-

LV

volume

In

20

method.

volume

the

anteri-

2DE

Angiographic

volume.

were

from

from a

by

were

diastolic

Transarea

interval

area

left

trans-apical

using

images.

an

20 LV

8-10

method

image

determinations

compared

with

the

volume

processor.

correlation

(r-=0.92,

~~0.01)

among

the

obtained.

cross-sectional

determinations And

image

angiographic

obtained two

serial

made

systolic

patints,

of

reconstructin

5" angle

a

Whole

summed

images

angiography.

reason, LV

each

and

calculation by

at

device. by

2DE

the

this

taken

covered

muscle

For

array

echocardiogram

determination covers

Electronic

phased

three-dimensional

inferoposterior

holding

angle

single-plane

window

were

(Sumitomo

wide

serial

allow LV

base.

through

ducer

oen

echo

72”

Japan

two-dimensional

volume

routine

Tokyo,

processor

a

whether

would

accurate 2DE

2DE or

image

SSH-IlA)

(LV)

and

Hospital,

and

examined

undergoing apex

tomogram TP-300)

Model

ventricle ion

Police

were suggest

reconstruction obtained stedy

from

state

multiple

by LV

this

and

volume

method.

volume

cross-sectional

can

be

determined

image.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF LEFT VENTRICULAR PRESSURE AND PEAK GRADIENT IN PATIENTS WITH VALVULAR AORTIC STENOSIS Jason Kirkman, MD; Arthur 0. Hagan, MD; Thomas G. DiSessa, MO; Chinq Ti, MD; Linda H. Samtov, MD; William F. Friedman; MD; Walter V.R. Vieweg;.MD; UCSD Medical Center, San Diego, California M-mode echocardiography was employed to estimate the left ventricular peak systolic pressure (LVPSP) and the left ventricular-aortic valve peak pressure gradient in 47 patients being evaluated for aortic stenosis prior to cardiac catheterization. A wall thickness to cavity dimension ratio: LVPSP = 225 X systolic posterior wall thickness f end-systolic dimension, was employed. The aortic valve pressure gradient was determined by subtracting the cuff systolic blood pressure from the calculated left ventricular peak systolic pressure. All measurements were obtained at the level of the chordae; 10 of 47 echocardiograms were technically unsatisfactory. In 27 selected adult patients (22-89 yrs) left ventricular peak systolic pressure and aortic valve pressure gradient correlated poorly with catheterization (cath) data (r = 0.49 and 0.64 respectively). When 10 patients with significant left ventricular dilatation, wall motion abnormalities, poor left ventricular performance, or systemic hypertension were excluded from analysis, correlation of left ventricular peak systolic pressure and aortic valve pressure gradient with cath data improved markedly (r = 0.73 and 0.92 respectively). All 10 pediatric patients (age 7-10 yrs) had excellent correlation of left ventricular peak systolic pressure and aortic valve pressure gradient with cath data (r = 0.95 and 0.91 respectively). Echocardiography is a reliable method to estimate severity of aortic stenosis in children but in only selected adults.

February 1980

The American Journal of CARDIOLOGY

Volume 45

471