- Email: [email protected]
British medical ultrasound society
Ultrasound in Med. & BioL, Vol. 6, pp. 305-307 Pergamon Press Ltd., 1980. Printed in Great Britain
REPORTS BRITISH MEDICAL UNTRASOUND SOCIETY
The Eleventh Annual Meeting of the British Medical Ultrasound Society was held in Edinburgh on the 17 and 18 December 1979. The following papers were presented.
10. Ultrasound in paediatric cardiology M. J. GODMAN. Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, U.K.
1. Where do we go from here? E. BARNETI'. Western Infirmary, Glasgow. 2. Ultrasound in paediatrics C. METREWELI. Hospital for Sick Children, London, U.K.
11. Comparison of M-mode and section scanning in valvular heart disease D. R. NAIK and W. TINDALE. Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, U.K.
3. The effect of the Emisonic 4500 real-time scanner in abdominal ultrasound
12. Early echographic recognition of rheumatic heart disease
D. O. COSGROVE, S. J. PUSSELL and S. MELLER. Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, U.K.
J. GEHRKE.
Hammersmith Hospital, London, U.K. 4. The role of ultrasonically gttided tint-needle
as#ration biopsy in the investigation of jaundice 13. Rapid left ventricular filling in severe ,mitral stenosis R. B. PRIDIE, L. A. GRIEVE,C. A. WEBB and J. A. S. DAVIES. Harefieid Hospital, Middlesex, U.K.
B. M. GOMPELS. Epsom District Hospital, Surrey, U.K. 5. The caudate lobe of liver--misunderstood ana. tomy A. AMERI, D. O. COSGROVEand S. J. PUSSELL. Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, U.K.
14. A comparison
between directional Doppler sonogrophy and arteriography in the assessment of aorto.-femoral and femoro-popllteal arterial disease D. B. BOOTH, H. FORREST, J. J. MORRICE, R. O. QUIN, C. D. SHELDON and R. VALLANCE. Gartnaval General Hospital, Glasgow, U.K.
6. The problem of gall stones in the ultrasono-
graphic diagnosis of jaundice N. GRAHAM and W. R. LEES. Middlesex Hospital, London, U.K.
15. The effect of proximal arterial narrowing on Doppler ultrasound waveforms D. H. EVANS, W. W. BARRIE and S. MACPHERSON. Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, U.K.
7. Sensitivity of ultrasound in the detection of gall
stones in comparison with oral cholecystogrom--p~ve survey A. E. A. JOSEPH, A. WILSON and H. TAYt,OR. St. George's Hospital, London, U.K. 8. Ultrasonic determination of the range of normal spleen size by maximal crtms.sectional area in vivo: correlation of cross-sectional area with
16. Analysis of Doppler shift waveforms in the
study of aorto-iliac disease R. SKIDMORE,J. P. WOODCOCK, D. R. BIRD and P. N. T. WELLS. Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, U.K.
isotope measurement M. R. JONES. University Hospital of Wales, Glamorgan, U.K.
17. Doppler angiogrophy in deep vein thrombosis C. P. L. WOOD and H. B. MEIRE. Clinical Research Centre, Harrow, U.K.
9. The assessment of inferior vena cava patency in
retroperitoneai tumours S. J. PUSSELL and D. O. COSGROVE. Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, U.K.
18. A
305
clinical
assessment
of
dLqraction
of
306
Reports ultrasound in the study of thyroid disorders J. MERTON, D. NICHOLAS and C. R. HILL. Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, U.K.
19. Post-storage data praceuing in ultrasound scanners g. K. MAXWELL. Ohio Nuclear/Unirad G m b H , Wiesbaden, West Germany. 20. A technique for the study of gastric motility u s ~ reai-thae ultrmmnd T. ANDERSON, W. N. McDICKEN, S. HOLT, I. C. STEWARTand R. HEADING. Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, U.K. 21. The anterior fontaueile: an ultrasound window for study of the brain K. C. DEWBURY. Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, U.K. 22. Neonmal cerebra1 ultrmmqrapim-4 com. parison of linem'-m'ray,mechanical and phased. array ~ scanners M. I. LEVENE. Hammersmith Hospital, London, U.K. 23. Fetal brenthln~ K. BODDY. Simpson Memorial Maternity Pavilion, Edinburgh, U.K. 24. Fetal activity relative to maternal meals in normal and insulin-dependent diabetic pregnancy J. W. WLADIMmOFF, P. J. ROOt~NBURO, J. LAAR and G. KROEZE. Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 25. Fetal and neonatal cardiovascular dynamics J. W. WLADIMIROFF,R. P. L. VOSTERS,J. H. M. WONDERGEMand L. VRU. Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 26. The incidence of fetal breathing movements, fetal trunk movements and total fetal activity in normal, growth-retarded and diabetic preg. ancles and factors influencing fetal activity A. B. ROBERTS, K. HERTOGS, S. STUBBS,D. GRtFF~, R. MOONEY, D. COOPER,J. M. BRUDENELL and S. CAMPBELL. King's College Hospital Medical School, London, U.K.
8. Ovarian imaging by ultrasound: an attempt to
define a reference plane B. -J. HACKELOER and S. NITSCHKE-DABELSTEIN. University of Marburg, West Germany. 29. Ultrasound monitoring of ovarian follicular
development A. D. CHRISTIE. University of Dundee, Dundee, U.K. 0. Ultrasonic characteristics of benign ovarian
C. R. MCARDIE and D. ANTONIOLI. Harvard Medical School, Boston, U.S.A. 31. Placental tissue typing: ultrasonegraphic and histological correlations K. VANDENBERGHE. University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 32. The use of "volumetric" fetal measuremeuts in twin pregnancies J. P. NEILSON.
Queen Mother's Hospital, Glasgow, U.K. 33. The evolution of ophthalmic echegraphy G. R. SUTHERLAND. Stobhill General Hospital, Glasgow, U.K. 4. A new ultrasonic B-scanner for oplghulmoiou J. S. PATON. West of Scotland Health Boards, Glasgow, U.K. 35. Ultramaie dlagamis of vitreous and retired disease D. MCLEOD. Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, U.K. 36. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of intra-ocular turnouts M. LEMAY and W. R. LEE. Western Infirmary, Glasgow, U.K. 37. An ultrasonicmethod of analysing tissuemotion R. J. DICKINSON and C. R. HILL. Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, U.K. 8. Texture antlysi~ In the ultrasonk investigation
of liverdlsease R. A. LERSKI, P. MORLEY, E. BARNETT, R. N. M. MACSWEEN, P. R. MILLS and G. WATKINSON. Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, U.K. 39. Chacncterlsntion of changes in placental echo-
27. Ultrasound determlnation of fetallimb length. J. T. QUEENAN, G. D. O'BRIEN and S. CAMPBELL, Kings's College Hospital, London, U.K.
graphic images using digitaltechniques D. C. ALMOND, B. GINZ and W. I. J. PRYCE. Northern General Hospital, Sheffield,U.K.
Reports 40. Ultrasonic B-~anning: a computer simulation
J. C. BAMBERand R. J. DICKINSON. Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, U.K. 41. Simultaneous monitoring of ultrasound realtime scanning position g. C. CHIVERS, T. J. BLOOMBERG, J. C. P. PEAKE and K. WATKINSON. St. Luke's Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, U.K. 42. Three-dimensional scanning T. G. BROWN. Aberdour, Fife, U.K.
UMB
Vol. 6, No. 3---F
307
3. lVteztwAectric plastic hydrophones for the character~tton of medical ultrasonic fields K. C. SHOTTON, D. R. BACON and R. M. QUILLIAM. National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, U.K. 4. A variable-intersecting-zone ultrasonic Doppler
device for the detection of blood flow in the pregnant ute-us R. MCHUGH, W. N. MCDICKEN, THOMSON and K. BODDY. Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, U.K.
REPORTS BRITISH MEDICAL UNTRASOUND SOCIETY
The Eleventh Annual Meeting of the British Medical Ultrasound Society was held in Edinburgh on the 17 and 18 December 1979. The following papers were presented.
10. Ultrasound in paediatric cardiology M. J. GODMAN. Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, U.K.
1. Where do we go from here? E. BARNETI'. Western Infirmary, Glasgow. 2. Ultrasound in paediatrics C. METREWELI. Hospital for Sick Children, London, U.K.
11. Comparison of M-mode and section scanning in valvular heart disease D. R. NAIK and W. TINDALE. Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, U.K.
3. The effect of the Emisonic 4500 real-time scanner in abdominal ultrasound
12. Early echographic recognition of rheumatic heart disease
D. O. COSGROVE, S. J. PUSSELL and S. MELLER. Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, U.K.
J. GEHRKE.
Hammersmith Hospital, London, U.K. 4. The role of ultrasonically gttided tint-needle
as#ration biopsy in the investigation of jaundice 13. Rapid left ventricular filling in severe ,mitral stenosis R. B. PRIDIE, L. A. GRIEVE,C. A. WEBB and J. A. S. DAVIES. Harefieid Hospital, Middlesex, U.K.
B. M. GOMPELS. Epsom District Hospital, Surrey, U.K. 5. The caudate lobe of liver--misunderstood ana. tomy A. AMERI, D. O. COSGROVEand S. J. PUSSELL. Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, U.K.
14. A comparison
between directional Doppler sonogrophy and arteriography in the assessment of aorto.-femoral and femoro-popllteal arterial disease D. B. BOOTH, H. FORREST, J. J. MORRICE, R. O. QUIN, C. D. SHELDON and R. VALLANCE. Gartnaval General Hospital, Glasgow, U.K.
6. The problem of gall stones in the ultrasono-
graphic diagnosis of jaundice N. GRAHAM and W. R. LEES. Middlesex Hospital, London, U.K.
15. The effect of proximal arterial narrowing on Doppler ultrasound waveforms D. H. EVANS, W. W. BARRIE and S. MACPHERSON. Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, U.K.
7. Sensitivity of ultrasound in the detection of gall
stones in comparison with oral cholecystogrom--p~ve survey A. E. A. JOSEPH, A. WILSON and H. TAYt,OR. St. George's Hospital, London, U.K. 8. Ultrasonic determination of the range of normal spleen size by maximal crtms.sectional area in vivo: correlation of cross-sectional area with
16. Analysis of Doppler shift waveforms in the
study of aorto-iliac disease R. SKIDMORE,J. P. WOODCOCK, D. R. BIRD and P. N. T. WELLS. Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, U.K.
isotope measurement M. R. JONES. University Hospital of Wales, Glamorgan, U.K.
17. Doppler angiogrophy in deep vein thrombosis C. P. L. WOOD and H. B. MEIRE. Clinical Research Centre, Harrow, U.K.
9. The assessment of inferior vena cava patency in
retroperitoneai tumours S. J. PUSSELL and D. O. COSGROVE. Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, U.K.
18. A
305
clinical
assessment
of
dLqraction
of
306
Reports ultrasound in the study of thyroid disorders J. MERTON, D. NICHOLAS and C. R. HILL. Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, U.K.
19. Post-storage data praceuing in ultrasound scanners g. K. MAXWELL. Ohio Nuclear/Unirad G m b H , Wiesbaden, West Germany. 20. A technique for the study of gastric motility u s ~ reai-thae ultrmmnd T. ANDERSON, W. N. McDICKEN, S. HOLT, I. C. STEWARTand R. HEADING. Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, U.K. 21. The anterior fontaueile: an ultrasound window for study of the brain K. C. DEWBURY. Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, U.K. 22. Neonmal cerebra1 ultrmmqrapim-4 com. parison of linem'-m'ray,mechanical and phased. array ~ scanners M. I. LEVENE. Hammersmith Hospital, London, U.K. 23. Fetal brenthln~ K. BODDY. Simpson Memorial Maternity Pavilion, Edinburgh, U.K. 24. Fetal activity relative to maternal meals in normal and insulin-dependent diabetic pregnancy J. W. WLADIMmOFF, P. J. ROOt~NBURO, J. LAAR and G. KROEZE. Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 25. Fetal and neonatal cardiovascular dynamics J. W. WLADIMIROFF,R. P. L. VOSTERS,J. H. M. WONDERGEMand L. VRU. Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 26. The incidence of fetal breathing movements, fetal trunk movements and total fetal activity in normal, growth-retarded and diabetic preg. ancles and factors influencing fetal activity A. B. ROBERTS, K. HERTOGS, S. STUBBS,D. GRtFF~, R. MOONEY, D. COOPER,J. M. BRUDENELL and S. CAMPBELL. King's College Hospital Medical School, London, U.K.
8. Ovarian imaging by ultrasound: an attempt to
define a reference plane B. -J. HACKELOER and S. NITSCHKE-DABELSTEIN. University of Marburg, West Germany. 29. Ultrasound monitoring of ovarian follicular
development A. D. CHRISTIE. University of Dundee, Dundee, U.K. 0. Ultrasonic characteristics of benign ovarian
C. R. MCARDIE and D. ANTONIOLI. Harvard Medical School, Boston, U.S.A. 31. Placental tissue typing: ultrasonegraphic and histological correlations K. VANDENBERGHE. University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 32. The use of "volumetric" fetal measuremeuts in twin pregnancies J. P. NEILSON.
Queen Mother's Hospital, Glasgow, U.K. 33. The evolution of ophthalmic echegraphy G. R. SUTHERLAND. Stobhill General Hospital, Glasgow, U.K. 4. A new ultrasonic B-scanner for oplghulmoiou J. S. PATON. West of Scotland Health Boards, Glasgow, U.K. 35. Ultramaie dlagamis of vitreous and retired disease D. MCLEOD. Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, U.K. 36. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of intra-ocular turnouts M. LEMAY and W. R. LEE. Western Infirmary, Glasgow, U.K. 37. An ultrasonicmethod of analysing tissuemotion R. J. DICKINSON and C. R. HILL. Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, U.K. 8. Texture antlysi~ In the ultrasonk investigation
of liverdlsease R. A. LERSKI, P. MORLEY, E. BARNETT, R. N. M. MACSWEEN, P. R. MILLS and G. WATKINSON. Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, U.K. 39. Chacncterlsntion of changes in placental echo-
27. Ultrasound determlnation of fetallimb length. J. T. QUEENAN, G. D. O'BRIEN and S. CAMPBELL, Kings's College Hospital, London, U.K.
graphic images using digitaltechniques D. C. ALMOND, B. GINZ and W. I. J. PRYCE. Northern General Hospital, Sheffield,U.K.
Reports 40. Ultrasonic B-~anning: a computer simulation
J. C. BAMBERand R. J. DICKINSON. Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, U.K. 41. Simultaneous monitoring of ultrasound realtime scanning position g. C. CHIVERS, T. J. BLOOMBERG, J. C. P. PEAKE and K. WATKINSON. St. Luke's Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, U.K. 42. Three-dimensional scanning T. G. BROWN. Aberdour, Fife, U.K.
UMB
Vol. 6, No. 3---F
307
3. lVteztwAectric plastic hydrophones for the character~tton of medical ultrasonic fields K. C. SHOTTON, D. R. BACON and R. M. QUILLIAM. National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, U.K. 4. A variable-intersecting-zone ultrasonic Doppler
device for the detection of blood flow in the pregnant ute-us R. MCHUGH, W. N. MCDICKEN, THOMSON and K. BODDY. Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, U.K.