Building biogenic beachrock: Visualizing microbially-mediated carbonate cement precipitation using XFM and a strontium tracer

Building biogenic beachrock: Visualizing microbially-mediated carbonate cement precipitation using XFM and a strontium tracer

Accepted Manuscript Building biogenic beachrock: Visualizing microbially-mediated carbonate cement precipitation using XFM and a strontium tracer Jen...

1MB Sizes 5 Downloads 37 Views

Accepted Manuscript Building biogenic beachrock: Visualizing microbially-mediated carbonate cement precipitation using XFM and a strontium tracer

Jenine McCutcheon, Luke D. Nothdurft, Gregory E. Webb, Jeremiah Shuster, Linda Nothdurft, David Paterson, Gordon Southam PII: DOI: Reference:

S0009-2541(17)30306-6 doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.05.019 CHEMGE 18350

To appear in:

Chemical Geology

Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

9 February 2017 15 May 2017 17 May 2017

Please cite this article as: Jenine McCutcheon, Luke D. Nothdurft, Gregory E. Webb, Jeremiah Shuster, Linda Nothdurft, David Paterson, Gordon Southam , Building biogenic beachrock: Visualizing microbially-mediated carbonate cement precipitation using XFM and a strontium tracer, Chemical Geology (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.05.019

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Building biogenic beachrock: Visualizing microbially-mediated carbonate cement

RI

PT

precipitation using XFM and a strontium tracer

Jenine McCutcheon a*1, Luke D. Nothdurftb, Gregory E. Webba, Jeremiah Shusterc,d, Linda

NU

SC

Nothdurfta,b, David Patersone, and Gordon Southama

a

PT E

D

MA

School of Earth & Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia b School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia c School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia d CSIRO Land and Water, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia e Australian Synchrotron, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia

1

CE

*Corresponding author email: [email protected]

AC

Present contact information for corresponding author: School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom; phone: +44 113 343 2846

A manuscript prepared for submission to: Chemical Geology

Keywords: beachrock; carbonate cement; cyanobacteria; sand cays; microbialite; X-ray fluorescence microscopy; strontium

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract The fate of reef islands is a topic of ongoing debate in the face of climate change-induced sea-level rise and increased cyclone intensity. Increased erosion and changes to the supply of reef-derived sediment may put sand reef cays at risk of dramatic morphological changes. These changes may have negative implications for the existence of reef cay environments,

PT

which host vital sea turtle and bird rookery habitats. Beachrock, consolidated carbonate beach

RI

sediment in the intertidal zone, forms naturally on many tropical beaches and reduces the

SC

erosion rates of these beaches when compared to unconsolidated sand. In spite of the critical role beachrock plays in stabilizing some reef cay shores, the method of beachrock formation

NU

is still incompletely understood. In this investigation, beachrock was synthesized using beach sand and beachrock samples from Heron Island (Great Barrier Reef, Australia) in aquarium

MA

experiments in which natural beachrock formation conditions were simulated. Beachrock was produced in two aquaria wherein the water chemistry was influenced by microorganisms

D

derived from the natural beachrock ‘inoculum’, whereas no cementation occurred in an

PT E

aquarium that lacked a microbial inoculum and was controlled only by physicochemical evapoconcentration. The new cements in the synthesized beachrock were analyzed using

CE

synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy and were identified using a Sr-tracer added to the experimental seawater. The resulting precipitates cement sand grains together

AC

and contain abundant microfossils of the microorganisms on whose exopolymer they nucleated, demonstrating the fundamental role microbes play in beachrock formation. These results are of interest because beachrock could be utilized as a natural coastline stabilization strategy on sand reef cays, and in turn, protect the unique habitats reef islands support.

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. Introduction Of all coastal environments that will be influenced by sea-level rise and increased cyclone intensity, sandy beaches on low elevation coral reef cays are among the most vulnerable due to their susceptibility to erosion. The complex geomorphological changes to coral reef sand cay size, shape, and structure resulting from sea-level rise have been the focus of

PT

several recent investigations (Cowell and Kench, 2001; Gibbons and Nicholls, 2006; Perry et

RI

al., 2011; Webb and Kench, 2010; Woodroffe, 2008; Zhang et al., 2004). Additionally, damage

SC

to coral reefs caused by an anticipated increase in cyclone intensity will likely outpace the recovery rate of corals, which in turn negatively affects other species dependent on the reef

NU

(Cheal et al., 2017). These changes, along with island inundation, have the potential to negatively influence sand cays populated by humans (Ford, 2012) and those that provide

MA

valuable wildlife habitats such as turtle and bird rookeries (Fuentes et al., 2009; Fuentes et al., 2011; Pike et al., 2015; Poloczanska et al., 2009). Understanding, and potentially counteracting,

D

these alterations to island morphology may be a necessity for the future of life on reef islands.

PT E

An important factor in understanding how sand cays will respond to sea-level rise is the role ecosystems play in maintaining coastal stability (Perry et al., 2011; Spalding et al., 2014).

CE

Saltwater marshes and mangroves are known to reduce wave energy, wave height, water velocity and turbulence, and thus reduce erosion and/or increase sedimentation (Christiansen et

AC

al., 2000; Gedan et al., 2010; Möller et al., 1999; Spalding et al., 2014). Reefs generate the carbonate sediment that make up reef islands, while also providing protection for the islands by reducing wave energy and thus, erosion rates (Kench and Brander, 2006b; Sheppard et al., 2005). A coastal ecosystem that has received little attention for its potential to aid in maintaining sand cay stability is beachrock. Beachrock forms on many subtropical beaches through the lithification of sediment by cement composed of one or both, aragonite and calcite

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (Gischler, 2008; Hanor, 1978; Neumeier, 1999; Scoffin and Stoddart, 1983; Vousdoukas et al., 2007; Webb et al., 1999). Beachrock formation has previously been attributed to strictly abiotic physicochemical processes (Alexandersson, 1969; Alexandersson, 1972; Davies and Kinsey, 1973; Dickinson, 1999; El-Sayed, 1988; Ginsburg, 1953; Gischler and Lomando, 1997; Meyers, 1987; Moore, 1973; Russell and McIntire, 1965). Biological processes also have been suggested

PT

(Davies and Kinsey, 1973; Krumbein, 1979; Maxwell, 1962) with recent studies highlighting

RI

the potential importance of microorganisms in beachrock cementation processes (Danjo and

SC

Kawasaki, 2013; Khan et al., 2016; Krumbein, 1979; Neumeier, 1999; Novitsky, 1981; Webb and Jell, 1997; Webb et al., 1999). Our recent work (McCutcheon et al., 2016) examining

NU

beachrock from Heron Island (Capricorn Group, Great Barrier Reef, Australia) demonstrated that microbes are actively contributing to carbonate dissolution and precipitation in beachrock.

MA

Beachrock hosts a unique shoreline ecosystem of lithophytic microorganisms that aid in generating these lithified deposits by enabling carbonate cement precipitation (Díez et al., 2007;

D

McCutcheon et al., 2016; Webb and Jell, 1997; Webb et al., 1999). Beachrock forms only in the

PT E

intertidal zone, and is known to form relatively quickly on timescales as short as a few years (Chivas et al., 1986; Easton, 1974; Frankel, 1968; Vousdoukas et al., 2007). These spatial and

CE

temporal constraints on beachrock cementation have allowed relict beachrock to be utilized as Quaternary sea-level and shore-line indicators (Mauz et al., 2015; Ramsay and Cooper, 2002;

AC

Tatumi et al., 2003; Vousdoukas et al., 2007). Although beachrock has long been known to reduce erosion of unconsolidated beach sediments by protecting them from wave action (Calvet et al., 2003; Chowdhury et al., 1997; Dickinson, 1999; Kindler and Bain, 1993), there has been little investigation into the potential use of beachrock as a means of stabilizing beaches that are susceptible to erosion. In addition, as the health of many coral reefs decline (Pandolfi et al., 2011) the extent of the protection they provide to their associated islands decreases, making it critical to seek alternative strategies for protecting reef islands (Sheppard et al., 2005).

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Although there is a growing body of research suggesting that microorganisms play an important role in beachrock formation, there has been little experimental work linking microbial activity to beachrock cement precipitation. In this investigation, natural beachrock formation conditions were simulated in the laboratory to test the role of microbial activity in beachrock cementation. Synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM) was used to

PT

characterize the newly formed carbonate cements. These results provide a better understanding

RI

of the role of microorganisms in beachrock generation, and could be used to guide future studies

SC

examining in situ beachrock formation with the aim of stabilizing reef islands as sea-level rises.

NU

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Field site description and sample collection. Heron Island (750 m × 240 m) is a sand cay

MA

on Heron Reef, a lagoonal platform reef (4.5 km × 10 km) in the Capricorn Group in the southern Great Barrier Reef (Fig. 1a) (Jell and Webb, 2012; Webb et al., 1999). The northern

D

and southern shores of Heron Island host beachrock outcrops as much as 20 m in width,

PT E

which dip seaward at slopes of 4-16°. The beachrock is lithified primarily by isopachous, acicular aragonite as well as micritic cements (Gischler, 2008; Webb et al., 1999). The

CE

presence of cemented microbialites in the Heron Island beachrock has been one of the primary pieces of evidence suggesting a microbial influence in the lithification of these

AC

deposits (McCutcheon et al., 2016; Webb and Jell, 1997; Webb et al., 1999). The microbial beachrock ecosystem is composed of a consortium of microbial endoliths living on, within, and between the carbonate grains that make up these deposits (McCutcheon et al., 2016). Several generations of beachrock occur on Heron Island, with blocks of older beachrock cemented in place by younger beachrock. Examination of the different beachrock generations suggests that cementation is an ongoing process; boring of carbonate grains by euendolithic cyanobacteria releases ions into solution which are precipitated as new cement (McCutcheon

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT et al., 2016). Over time, this process results in a transition from high porosity and low cement content, to low porosity and high cement content. The ‘self-healing’ property of beachrock to re-cement blocks into place after they have been ripped up by storm activity is examined in this study. Samples of carbonate beach sand, the apparent youngest generation of beachrock and associated microbial endoliths were collected from the southern beachrock outcrop of

PT

Heron Island. The carbonate beach sand was collected from the supratidal portion of the

RI

beach and consisted of carbonate sediment 0.5-3 mm in diameter. The apparent youngest

SC

generation of beachrock was selected as a starting material for this study because it contains less cement than its older counterpart, a characteristic of beachrock that results in the younger

NU

generations being more porous and hosting more microbial biomass relative to older beachrock (McCutcheon et al., 2016). Furthermore, younger beachrock was chosen for

MA

experimental use as it contains less cement than the older beachrock, making it easier to discern the precipitation of new cements during the experiment.

D

2.2 Experimental aquaria design. The samples described above were used in three

PT E

experimental aquaria to reconstruct the biogeochemical conditions of the Heron Island beach. The aquaria were housed in a Conviron Adaptis A1000 growth chamber operating at 25°C,

CE

and 12 h of light (06:00 - 18:00; light intensity: 700 mol) and 12 h of dark (18:00 - 06:00). Each aquarium was 25 × 17 × 19 cm (l × w × h) in size and contained 8 cm of sediment in the

AC

bottom (Fig. 2). Two of the aquaria acted as experimental systems while the third was used as a control. The beachrock samples were fragmented so that the ~1 cm-thick surface layer containing macroscopically visible endoliths was separated from the underlying ‘inner’ beachrock. The ‘fragmented beachrock’ (henceforth referred to as FBR) aquarium contained 7 cm of fragmented inner beachrock covered with 1 cm of the fragmented surface layer beachrock (Fig. 2). The ‘sand’ aquarium (henceforth referred to as Sand) contained 7 cm of 90% (by weight) beach sand seeded with 10% inner beachrock fragments. This layer was

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT topped with 1 cm of 90% beach sand seeded with 10% surface beachrock fragments (Fig. 2). The control aquarium (Control) contained 8 cm of beach sand from Heron Island with no beachrock ‘inoculum’. The base of each aquarium was wrapped with aluminium foil up to the surface of the sediment to prevent light from stimulating cyanobacteria growth through the sides of the glass.

PT

One end of each aquarium was partitioned off with a plastic mesh screen creating a

RI

sediment-free reservoir for the addition and removal of seawater. The seawater was able to passively flow through the screen to infiltrate the sediment as a means of mimicking tidal

SC

activity. In each aquarium, the alternating addition (06:00 – 06:30 and 18:00 – 18:30), and

NU

removal of seawater (00:00 - 00:30 and 12:00 - 12:30) occurred at 6 hour intervals using Masterflex L/S® Precision Variable-Speed Console Drive (07528 series) peristaltic pumps

MA

and Norprene® tubing (internal diameter of 2.4 mm). A volume of 1 L of seawater remained in each aquarium at all times saturating the bottom 2 cm of the sediment and acted as ‘low

D

tide’. A volume of 3 L was added to each aquarium as an incoming ‘high tide’, resulting in a

PT E

water depth of 13 cm (5 cm above the surface of the sediment). It is important to note that ‘fresh’ seawater (Tropic Marin™ Sea Salt, salinity of 35.0) was prepared for each incoming

CE

tide and the ‘old’ seawater discarded after each outgoing tide. Nitrogen and phosphorous were added to the seawater in concentrations equal to 10% of those in standard BG-11

AC

cyanobacteria growth medium (109 mg/L NO3- added as NaNO3; 2.2 mg/L PO43- added as K2HPO4) (Vonshak, 1986). These concentrations are comparable to those measured in groundwater on Heron Island (Chen, 2000). Strontium (40 mg/L Sr2+ added as SrCl2·6H2O) was used as a tracer to distinguish new carbonate cement from that already present in the natural material (Banner, 1995; Capo et al., 1998). The concentration of Sr was chosen such that new cement could be identified by a higher than normal Sr content, but would not be so high as to interfere with mineral precipitation or cause the aquaria to be supersaturated with

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT respect to strontium carbonate minerals. This latter point was confirmed by checking mineral saturation indices using PHREEQC Interactive Version 3.1.1 (Parkhurst and Appelo, 1999). The experimental aquaria were run for eight weeks. 2.3 Water chemistry analysis. Water samples were collected every 7 days. On each sampling day, waters were collected at 07:00, 09:00, 11:00, 19:00, 21:00, and 23:00; providing a means

PT

of documenting aqueous geochemistry conditions in the aquaria at the beginning, middle, and

RI

end of high tide under both light and dark conditions. The pH, conductivity (mS/cm, then

SC

converted to salinity) and dissolved oxygen (DO) (mg/L) of the bulk water were measured in each aquarium at each sampling time point. Dissolved inorganic carbon was determined by

NU

analyzing water samples using a Shimadzu TOC-L CSH Total Organic Carbon Analyzer by measuring total inorganic carbon (TIC). Water samples were collected, filtered (0.45 µm

MA

pore-size), and analyzed for cations (Ca2+, K+, Mg2+, S6+, Sr2+) using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) using a Perkin Elmer Optima 3300 DV

D

(measurement uncertainty: 12%). Phosphorous (P as PO43-) and nitrogen (N as NOx)

PT E

concentrations were measured using a Lachat QuikChem8500 Flow Injection Analyzer (FIA).

CE

2.4 Cement characterization. The surface of the sediment in each aquarium was visually checked weekly for signs of lithification, with samples of what appeared to be newly lithified

AC

beachrock being collected each week after the first two weeks. Polished thin sections of the original beach sand, fragmented inner beachrock, fragmented surface beachrock, and weekly samples of synthetic beachrock collected from the Sand and FBR aquaria were analyzed on the X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM) beamline at the Australian Synchrotron (Paterson et al., 2011). The petrographic thin sections were affixed to a Perspex sample holder using Mylar tape and mounted on the sample translation stages of the X-ray microprobe. A monochromatic X-ray beam (18.5 keV) was focused to ~2.0 µm using Kirkpatrick-Baez

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT mirrors (Paterson et al., 2011). The Maia detection system used on the XFM beamline enables fast, high definition elemental mapping of complex natural materials (Paterson et al., 2011; Ryan et al., 2010; Ryan et al., 2014). Regions of interest on each thin section were raster-scanned on-the-fly through the focused beam to accumulate X-ray fluorescence spectra at each scan pixel. The pixel size was 1×1 µm, 2×2 µm or 10×10 µm and the dwell time per

PT

pixel was between 0.33 and 1.0 msec. GeoPIXE software was used to produce elemental

RI

concentration maps from the raw data (CSIRO, 2011). Elemental concentrations were

SC

quantified by calibrating to thin foil standards of Pt, Fe, and Mn of known areal density. A large number of elements were simultaneously mapped and analyzed (P, S, Cl, Ar, K, Ca, Cr,

NU

Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Br, Sr) and the information from maps of Ca and Sr were the main focus of this investigation.

MA

The polished thin sections of synthesized beachrock and whole mount samples of the associated microbial mats collected from the aquaria were characterized using scanning

D

electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) using a JEOL

PT E

JSM-7100F Field Emission SEM (FE-SEM). The whole mount samples of microbial mat and associated grains were fixed using 2.5% glutaraldehyde and dehydrated through an ethanol

CE

dehydration series (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, 100%, 100%) using a Pelco Biowave microwave (each step: 250 W, 40 s, no vacuum) prior to being critical point dried (Tousimis Samdri-

AC

PVT-3B critical point dryer). The dried samples were mounted on stainless steel slug stubs using adhesive carbon tabs. All thin sections and whole mount samples were coated with 5 nm of iridium using a Quarum Q150T S sputter coater. The thin sections were examined using back-scattered electron (BSE-SEM) mode at 15 kV and a working distance of 12 mm. Whole mount samples were examined using secondary electron (SE-SEM) mode at 1, 2, or 5 kV at a working distance of 9 mm. Polished thin-sections of beachrock were observed using a Leica DM6000M microscope equipped with a Leica DFC310 FX camera. The starting

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT materials used to construct the aquaria were characterized using light microscopy and XFM as described above (Fig. 3).

3. Results 3.1 Water chemistry. The average pH, and DO of the initial seawater were 8.30 and 9.1 mg/L,

PT

respectively (Fig. 4a-b). The pH of the FBR and Sand aquaria increased during the day to

RI

average values of 8.77 and 8.79 at 11:00, respectively; and decreased during the night to

SC

average values of 8.15 and 8.18 at 23:00, respectively (Fig. 4a). The pH of the Control aquarium remained steady at ~8.30 during both light and dark conditions (Fig. 4a). The DO of

NU

the FBR and Sand aquaria increased to average values of 16.8 and 15.5 mg/L at 11:00 and decreased to average values of 4.1 and 4.9 at 23:00, respectively (Fig. 4b). The 11:00 averages

MA

are underestimates of the oxygen content of the FBR and Sand aquaria, as they reached the saturation limit of the DO meter of 20 mg/L by week 5 and 4 of the experiment, respectively.

D

The DO of the seawater decreased upon addition to the Control aquarium, followed by a slight

PT E

increase during the day to a 11:00 time point average of 8.6 mg/L, and a small decrease at night to a 23:00 time point average of 7.4 mg/L (Fig. 4b). The salinity of the initial seawater was

CE

35.0, and the average salinity in the FBR, Sand, and Control aquaria over the course of the experiment were 38.4, 38.3, and 37.9, respectively.

AC

The concentration of DIC in the Control aquarium increased from 30.4 mg/L in the initial seawater during the day to 33.4 mg/L at 11:00, and at night to 33.6 mg/L h at 23:00 (Fig. 4c). DIC in the FBR and Sand aquaria followed the same trend, increasing by 9:00 to 32.5 mg/L and 33.2 mg/L, and then respectively declining to 26.9 mg/L and 28.0 mg/L by 11:00. At night, the DIC increased to 38.2 mg/L in both aquaria by 23:00 (Fig. 4c). The concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+ increased during both light and dark conditions in all three aquaria (Fig. 4d,e). The concentration of Sr2+ measured in the initial seawater was 39.1

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ppm (vs. target of 40 ppm) and exhibited minor fluctuations between 38.4 and 40.9 ppm in all three aquaria during light and dark conditions (Fig. 4f). Nutrient (N and P) concentrations decreased during both light and dark conditions in the FBR and Sand aquaria (Fig. 4g,h). From an initial seawater concentration of 24.7 ppm, nitrogen (as N in NOx) decreased in the FBR and Sand aquaria to 11:00 average values of 22.9 and 21.5 ppm, and 23:00 average values of 23.9

PT

and 22.2 ppm, respectively (Fig. 4g). Phosphorous (as P in PO43-) decreased from 0.79 ppm in

RI

the initial seawater to 0.56 and 0.49 ppm by 11:00 and to 0.72 and 0.61 ppm by 23:00 in the

SC

FBR and Sand aquaria, respectively (Fig. 4h).

3.2 Cement formation and characterization. Over the eight week experiment, microbial

NU

growth in the FBR and Sand aquaria resulted in the formation of microbial mats on the surface of the sediment, reminiscent of those found on the beachrock on Heron Island.

MA

Secondary electron SEM of whole-mount samples of the microbial mats revealed extensive growth of filamentous cyanobacteria in association with cocci and bacilli bacteria (Fig. 5).

D

Small, millimeter- to centimeter-sized pieces of beachrock were synthesized in the top

PT E

5 cm of sediment in the FBR and Sand aquaria. Beachrock synthesis was first observed three weeks into the experiment. The relative size of the new beachrock grains increased over time

CE

to a maximum grain diameter of 2 cm. No cemented grains were found in the Control aquarium at any point during the experiment.

AC

X-ray florescence microscopy of thin sections of the synthesized beachrock from the FBR and Sand aquaria revealed that the new cement precipitates could be easily identified due to being enrichment in Sr (Fig. 6-9,11) compared to the original carbonate sediment and cements (Fig. 3). The original aragonite sand grains and cements contained 0.13 atomic % Sr while the new cements precipitated during the experiment contained an average of 0.85 atomic % Sr based on EDS analysis. Figure 6 shows cement precipitation in a large region of a sample collected from the surface of the FBR aquarium after eight weeks, in which the

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT plane of the thin section is parallel to the surface of the sediment in the aquarium, while Figures 7-9a-d highlight smaller structures within this region. The new precipitates can be seen cementing sand grains together and coating grain surfaces (Fig. 7a,d,e). Viewing the new cements using SEM revealed abundant microfossils exhibiting a diverse range of cell morphologies (Fig. 7b) that are commonly preserved as fossilized microcolonies (Fig. 7f-h).

PT

Many of the cement coatings on grain surfaces form dendritic microbialites; they contain

RI

mineralized cells as well as new microbial borings (Fig. 8). Structurally, these newly formed

SC

microbialites are very similar to those pre-existing in the fragmented beachrock added to the aquaria but can be differentiated from those due to the difference in Sr content (Fig. 9).

NU

Some of the precipitates exhibit a ‘wheat-sheaf’ morphology, interpreted as aragonite (Fig. 10a,b), while others are present as nanoscale granules (c,d). When viewed in a whole-

MA

mount sample, these precipitates are found in association with extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) (Fig. 10a,c). EDS of the cement (Fig. 10 e-g) showed a range of Mg-

D

content, from 0.01 to 12 atomic %, suggesting that co-precipitation of aragonite and calcite

PT E

may be occurring within microenvironments in the beachrock system (Berner, 1975; Ries et al., 2008). The biofilm observed growing on the top surface of the sediment and in the

CE

interstices between sediment grains contains both trapped-and-bound material and newly

AC

precipitated carbonate (Fig. 11).

4. Discussion

4.1 Diurnal microbial activity as a trigger for beachrock cementation through carbonate dissolution and precipitation. The data presented in Figure 4 is intended to demonstrate the overall trends in the water chemistry as a function of the diurnal changes in microbial activity in the FBR and Sand aquaria. During the day, cyanobacterial and algal oxygenic photosynthesis resulted in the measured increase in dissolved oxygen, coincidentally

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT increasing the pH through hydroxyl anion production. At night, heterotrophy would have been the dominant form of microbial metabolism, resulting in oxygen consumption and a decline in pH after dark. Note, the changes in water chemistry only reflect the bulk water overlying the sediment and do not represent the pore water in the biofilm or underlying sand. As a result, the changes that were measured are a diluted product of what is taking place in

PT

the sediment and it is expected that changes in water chemistry between the grains are far

RI

greater in magnitude. There is also potential that the bulk water chemistry does not reflect

SC

other forms of microbial metabolism known to contribute to carbonate mineral precipitation, such as that of sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) (Braissant et al., 2007; Gallagher et al., 2012)

NU

and ureolytic bacteria (Ferris et al., 2004; Mitchell and Ferris, 2006). Although natural beachrock forms in the intertidal zone, and is thus well oxygenated overall, these organisms

MA

could be found in protected anaerobic microenvironments below the surface of the beachrock.

D

The increase in the concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in the Control aquarium are

PT E

likely a result of evaporation (Fig. 4d,e). Interpreting the changes in cation concentrations in the FBR and Sand aquaria is more difficult because they represent the combined effects of:

CE

evaporation, microbial processes, mineral dissolution, and mineral precipitation. The summation of these processes makes it difficult to discern which processes took place in the

AC

aquaria at any given time. However, the overall changes in Ca2+ and Mg2+ concentrations are expected to be largely representative of the net balance between mineral dissolution and precipitation. For instance, the concentration of Ca2+ measured at 07:00 in all three aquaria was greater than that measured in the ‘fresh’ seawater added at 06:00. The increase in Ca2+ concentration measured in the Control aquaria was likely a result of evaporation, however, the greater magnitude increases measured in the FBR and Sand aquaria were likely the product of two microbial processes taking place contemporaneously: 1) mineral dissolution

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT resulting from cyanobacteria boring into the grains; and 2) heterotrophic consumption of EPS. First, endolithic cyanobacteria in the FBR and Sand aquaria were dissolving carbonate in detrital grains, producing cations in solution. Some cyanobacteria are known to induce spontaneous carbonate dissolution at the cell-borehole interface by causing a reduction in the ion activity product of carbonate (Garcia-Pichel et al., 2010). Once in solution, the Ca2+ ions

PT

are internalized by the apical cell of the cyanobacterium filament, transported down the

RI

length of the filament through intercellular Ca2+-ATPase pumps, and finally expelled away

SC

from the borehole into the surrounding solution (Garcia-Pichel et al., 2010). Antiparallel transport of two protons along the filament towards the boring front is necessary to balance

NU

each Ca2+ ion moving away from the excavation site via this intercellular pathway (GarciaPichel et al., 2010). These protons can then contribute to carbonate dissolution, after which

MA

the resultant HCO3- can be utilized by the cyanobacterium for photosynthesis (Garcia-Pichel et al., 2010). Previous studies on the occurrence of phototrophic boring in coastal

D

environments suggest that it can dissolve up to 0.6 kg of CaCO3/m2/year (Chazottes et al.,

PT E

1995). In natural beachrock formation in the intertidal zone, possible explanations for cyanobacterial boring include: nutrient or space acquisition; and protection from grazing, UV

CE

radiation, wave activity, and desiccation during low tide (Cockell and Herrera, 2008; McCutcheon et al., 2016). Some of the borings were likely present in the grains prior to

AC

sample collection; however, those found in the newly precipitated cements indicate that active microbial boring was taking place during the experiment (Fig. 8b). In the aquaria, the microbes lacked stressors such as wave activity, macroscopic grazers, nutrient limitation, and solar UV radiation, suggesting that space acquisition or protection from desiccation during low tide may be the incentive for microbial boring in beachrock. Some of the pre-existing and new borings have been filled with new cement made visible by its high Sr-content (Fig. 6,7), which is consistent with reports of carbonate re-precipitation as a result of localized

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT microenvironments of carbonate supersaturation where Ca2+ ions are being excreted by boring phototrophs (Bathurst, 1966; Garcia-Pichel et al., 2010; Margolis and Rex, 1971). The presence of cement-filled borings across grain boundaries has been known to provide strength to carbonate structures, such as stromatolites (Macintyre et al., 2000). The second possible cause for the increase in Ca2+ concentration is heterotrophic

PT

consumption of EPS. This substance is rich in carboxyl groups that give it a net negative

RI

charge, enabling it to bind cations such as Ca2+ that, in turn, attract low molecular weight

SC

organic compounds (Braissant et al., 2009; Flemming and Wingender, 2010; Körstgens et al., 2001). Decho et al. (2005) demonstrated that the EPS production rate in cyanobacterial mats

NU

coincides closely with photosynthesis, with the greatest EPS production occurring during midday. In the present study, as cyanobacterial photosynthesis began to produce oxygen in

MA

the morning, heterotrophic metabolism in the aquarium would have increased and destabilized the EPS structure by oxidizing the organic compounds to bicarbonate (Braissant

D

et al., 2009; Decho et al., 2005). The bicarbonate would have then been able to react with the

PT E

‘reservoir’ of cations available in the EPS microenvironment. Decho et al. (2005) also demonstrated that heterotrophic consumption of EPS has a diurnal cycle that peaks with

CE

maximum photosynthesis during the day, as well as just after dark. Consumption of the EPS releases the adsorbed cations back into solution, causing the concentration of Ca2+ in solution

AC

to increase and making carbonate precipitation favorable. Carbonate mineral precipitation by this process has resulted in mat lithification in many past and modern environments (Aloisi, 2008; Altermann et al., 2006; Braissant et al., 2007; Dupraz et al., 2009; Dupraz and Visscher, 2005). Note, the intricate relationships between the dissolved cations and mineral dissolution and precipitation, biofilm adsorption, and evaporation make it difficult to interpret the cation concentration data beyond the described overarching trends.

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The beginning of the cementation process, which resulted in the formation of the mineralized microbialites observed in the aquaria (Fig. 7-10), is captured in the nucleation of new Sr-enriched carbonate grains within the biofilms (Fig. 11). The production of biofilm on near surface grains in the FBR and Sand aquaria was extensive enough to provide nucleation sites for carbonate precipitation such that the resultant cements were able to connect grains in

PT

the span of only eight weeks, demonstrating the rapid nature of this process. This

RI

characteristic is also highlighted by the presence of borings in the new cements (Fig. 8b) and

SC

new cements filling borings, illustrating that beachrock is exceptionally dynamic. It is likely that the initial stabilization and cementation of sand by microbes allows the longer-term,

NU

more pervasive isopachous cement, common in the older beachrock, to form in the underlying sand. As consolidation progresses, it appears that the interstitial spaces in the

MA

beachrock become increasingly filled with cement, causing a reduction in the volume of pore space available for habitation by endolithic cyanobacteria (McCutcheon et al., 2016). The

D

reduced porosity has a two-fold effect on microbial growth: while decreasing the space

PT E

available for biofilm growth it also reduces the amount of water than can be retained in the beachrock interstices during low tide, thus increasing the likelihood of biofilm desiccation.

CE

Although the older beachrock still hosts an endolithic microbial community, a decline in microbial biomass over time would likely cause a corresponding decrease in the microbial

AC

contribution to cementation. A subsequent increase in porosity of the beachrock, such as would occur through damage to the outcrop by storm activity, could instigate a resurgence of microbial activity and cementation. 4.2 Sea-level rise, beachrock, and island stability. The response of reef islands to sea-level rise is one of ongoing discussion. Several studies have suggested that these islands will be vulnerable to sea-level rise through increased erosion, inundation, and salinization of the water table (Church et al., 2006; Gibbons and Nicholls, 2006; Khan et al., 2002; McLean and

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Tsyban, 2001; Mimura, 1999; Nicholls et al., 2007; Roy and Connell, 1991; Woodroffe, 2008; Yamano et al., 2007). The prevailing hypothesis, that reef islands will be subjected to extensive erosion in the event of sea-level rise, is largely due to application of the Bruun Rule to these shorelines (Bruun, 1962; Schwartz, 1967). Such predictions, however, have been criticized because island shores cannot be treated in the same manner as linear continental

PT

coastlines (Cooper and Pilkey, 2004; Cowell and Kench, 2001; Webb and Kench, 2010).

RI

Reef islands, and particularly sand cays, are dynamic structures that change in morphology as

SC

a result of changes in: wave regimes, longshore currents, ocean dynamics, sea-level, and weather, particularly storm events (Cheal et al., 2017; Church et al., 2006; Kench and

NU

Brander, 2006a; Mimura et al., 2007). High energy events such as cyclones and tsunamis can result in either net island erosion (Harmelin-Vivien, 1994; Stoddart, 1963) or accretion

MA

(Kench et al., 2006; Maragos et al., 1973). Cyclone intensity is predicted to increase in the coming years and result in degradation of coral reefs, a trend already being observed in the

D

central-south part of the GBR (Cheal et al., 2017). The frequency at which a particular reef

PT E

island experiences storms affects the size of the sediment of which the island is comprised. Sand-sized grains dominate islands that experience low storm frequencies, while islands that

CE

experience frequent storms tend to be composed of rubble (Chivas et al., 1986; Gourlay, 1988; Stoddart, 1963). Some models suggest that reef islands are less delicate than previously

AC

thought and will remain stable in the event of the projected sea-level rise of ~0.5 m by 2100 (Kench et al., 2005). That is not to say, however, that island morphology and location will not change with increasing sea-level. Predicting these changes requires a better understanding of the many factors that influence reef island morphodynamics, which necessitates better monitoring of current changes to reef island morphology (Kench and Harvey, 2003; Webb and Kench, 2010).

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT A major factor in reef island sedimentological processes is the type and health of the reef from which the islands’ sediments are derived (Woodroffe et al., 2007). The reef acts as a sediment factory by producing carbonate grains from the skeletal remains of invertebrates living in and on the reef, as well as through erosion of the reef framework by physical and biological processes (Perry et al., 2011). Once sediment is generated by the reef, the grains are susceptible

PT

to physical abrasion, microbial boring, and chemical dissolution; the summation of these

RI

processes alter size, shape, and density of the sediment that reaches the island (Perry, 2000).

SC

The sediment is deposited on the beach, where it becomes the starting material for potential beachrock formation. The species richness and relative abundances of the organisms (corals,

NU

coralline algae, foraminifera, molluscs) from which reef sediment is generated will alter the type, quantity, hydrodynamic properties, and rate of deposition of the sediment available for

MA

island building (Perry et al., 2011; Yamano et al., 2000). Predicting how ecological problems such as overfishing, pollution, coral disease and bleaching, changes in storm intensity, sea-

D

level- rise, and ocean acidification will alter reef health is not a small task (Hoegh-Guldberg et

PT E

al., 2007; Jackson et al., 2001; Kuroyanagi et al., 2009; Pandolfi et al., 2003; Perry et al., 2011; Ries et al., 2009), however, understanding how reefs will respond to these changes is necessary

CE

for predicting their ability to supply sediment for reef island building as sea-level rises. The dynamic nature of reef islands means that it will not be possible to avoid all changes

AC

to island shape, size, and position on the reef flat. In cases where island erosion is likely to increase in undesirable locations, such as those inhabited by humans or that provide unique habitats for organisms, implementing strategies to minimize erosion may be necessary. Beaches dominated by sand-sized grains are more susceptible to erosion than those composed of rubble (Perry et al., 2011), and the prevalence of beaches composed of rubble grade sediment may increase in the event of mass coral bleaching (Baker et al., 2008). The combination of these factors means that sand beaches may be particularly vulnerable, and erosion or inundation of

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT these shorelines may negatively impact sea turtles that rely on supratidal sandy beaches for nesting (Fuentes et al., 2009; Fuentes et al., 2011; Pike et al., 2015; Van Houtan and Bass, 2007). Beachrock formation may provide a natural means of reducing erosion of sand beaches on reef islands. The intrinsic process by which beachrock forms, demonstrated in this study, restricts it to the intertidal zone where it will absorb a large portion of the wave energy that

PT

reaches the shore and protect the supratidal part of the beach from storm activity and erosion.

RI

Since lithification is limited to the intertidal zone, the supratidal sand remains unconsolidated

SC

and suitable for nesting. Beachrock is found naturally on islands that host turtle rookeries, which is a critical point in the potential to employ beachrock as a means of stabilizing beaches

NU

because it maintains the shore as a ‘beach’, unlike other coastline habitats such as saltwater marshes or mangroves (Christiansen et al., 2000; Gedan et al., 2010; Spalding et al., 2014). The

MA

dynamic nature of beachrock means that it may continue to form in the intertidal zone even in the event the island migrates on the reef flat, continuing to protect the unconsolidated sand

D

further up the shore.

PT E

The beachrock on Heron Island shows evidence of multiple generations of cementation through the presence of older beachrock blocks, presumably ripped up during

CE

storms, being cemented in place by younger beachrock. We have previously proposed an explanation for how beachrock blocks are re-cemented by microbially generated precipitates

AC

(McCutcheon et al., 2016). This ‘self-healing’ characteristic of beachrock is useful for stabilizing shorelines because these outcrops can regenerate on decadal or shorter time scales. The FBR aquarium was, in part, designed as a means of investigating this self-healing property of beachrock and successfully recreated a small-scale version of a beachrock outcrop damaged by a storm. This system also provides a natural analogue to the recent advances in self-healing bioconcrete (Jonkers et al., 2010; Wiktor and Jonkers, 2011).

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT It is currently unknown how widespread formation of beachrock could alter large-scale beach morphodynamics through changes in sediment erosion and deposition (Cooper, 1991; Larson and Kraus, 2000; Sumer et al., 2005; Vousdoukas et al., 2007). The presence of beachrock on cay shores should be considered when predicting the morphological behavior of reef cays, making it necessary to understand the processes driving beachrock formation. Further

PT

investigations are required to understand how beachrock will factor into the already complex

RI

conversation surrounding reef island responses to sea-level rise and reef health, especially if

SC

there is potential to purposefully enhance these dynamic shoreline structures as a strategy for

NU

maintaining reef cay stability.

5. Conclusions

MA

The beachrock synthesis experiment conducted in this study demonstrated the fundamental role microorganisms play in beachrock cementation processes, and suggested that

D

physicochemical controls such as evaporation and tidal wetting and drying are not sufficient to

PT E

instigate cement precipitation. The use of strontium enriched seawater enabled identification of the new cements using XFM. Cementation appears to be driven by cation generation through

CE

cyanobacteria dissolution of carbonate grains and subsequent precipitation of new cements in association with EPS. High-resolution SEM of these precipitates, composed primarily of

AC

aragonite, revealed abundant microfossils. The diversity of observed microfossils indicates that entire microbial biofilms were becoming mineralized during the beachrock formation process. These results provide a valuable contribution to the current understanding of the biogeochemical controls on beachrock formation. These findings may be applied to designing in situ beachrock cementation experiments, which, in turn, may aid in developing strategies to utilize beachrock as a natural means of stabilizing vulnerable reef islands against sea-level rise.

20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Acknowledgements Part of this research was undertaken on the X-ray Fluorescence Microscopy beamline at the Australian Synchrotron, Victoria, Australia. This work was supported by the Multi-modal Australian

ScienceS

Imaging

and

Visualisation

Environment

(MASSIVE)

(www.massive.org.au). For their technical assistance, we thank Marietjie Mostert and Tracey

PT

Crossingham of the Environmental Analytical and Geochemistry Unit at The University of

RI

Queensland (ICP-OES), Dr. Beatrice Keller-Lehmann and Nathan Clayton of the Advanced

SC

Water Management Centre at The University of Queensland (FIA and DIC), Dr. Ron Rasch and the staff of the UQ Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis (SEM-EDS). Beachrock

NU

and sand samples were collected with permission from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Parks Authority (permit no.: G14/37249.1). J. McCutcheon was supported by a National Sciences

MA

and Engineering Research Council of Canada PhD Postgraduate Scholarship. Funding to G.

D

Southam was provided in part by Carbon Management Canada (C390).

PT E

Figure Captions

Figure 1. (a) Location of Heron Island on Heron Reef in the Capricorn Group of the Great

CE

Barrier Reef off the east coast of Queensland, Australia (Google Earth, 2014). (b) Beachrock in the intertidal zone along the southern shore of Heron Island. (c) The natural beachrock was

AC

used as a starting material in the beachrock synthesis experiments. (d) Visible growth of endolithic cyanobacteria near the surface of the beachrock.

Figure 2. The aquarium design used in the beachrock formation experiments. Adding and removing seawater to and from each of the three aquaria using peristaltic pumps simulated tidal activity. The three aquaria differed in their sediment content: 1) the fragmented beachrock (FBR) aquarium contained 100% broken beachrock; 2) the Sand aquarium

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT contained 10 wt% fragmented beachrock and 90 wt% beach sand; and 3) the Control aquarium contained 100% beach sand.

Figure 3. Characterization of the fragmented beachrock and beach sand used in the beachrock formation experiments. These materials are characterized using: 1) photography of whole

PT

samples, 2) plane-polarized light (PPL), 3) cross-polarized light (XPL), 4) XFM of Ca

RI

content, and 5) XFM of Sr content of polished thin sections. XFM scan conditions: pixel size:

SC

10×10 µm, dwell time: 0.56 msec.

NU

Figure 4. Water chemistry plots showing the change over time of mean (a) pH, and concentrations of (b) dissolved oxygen, (c) DIC, (d) Ca2+, (e) Mg2+, (f) Sr2+, (g) NOx-N, and

D

overall trends in the water chemistry.

MA

(h) PO43--P. Each data point is a time point average for the eight week experiment to reflect

PT E

Figure 5. Secondary electron micrographs showing the biofilms that formed on the surfaces of the (a-b) FBR and (c-f) Sand aquaria after the eight week experiment. The biofilms are

AC

heterotrophs.

CE

composed of filamentous cyanobacteria producing abundant EPS, and associated

Figure 6. XFM showing the (a) Sr and (b) Sr-Ca content in a sample collected from the surface of the FBR aquarium after eight weeks of the experiment. In (a) the color scale indicates Sr concentration, with bright yellow regions having the highest Sr content. In (b) bright yellow regions indicate higher Sr content, while bright blue indicates higher Ca content. Note, Sr-rich regions (bright yellow in (a) and (b)) indicate new cement precipitation. The plane of the sample is parallel to the surface of the sediment in the

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT aquarium. Boxes in (b) indicate regions depicted in Fig. 7-9. XFM scan conditions: pixel size: 2×2 µm, dwell time: 0.33 msec.

Figure 7. (a) XFM showing the Sr-Ca content of a portion of the week 8 Sand aquarium sample shown in Fig. 6. Note, bright yellow regions indicate higher strontium content, while

PT

bright blue indicates higher calcium content. (b-c) These new cements (yellow in (a)) show a

RI

diverse assortment of microfossil morphologies. (d-e) The newly precipitated carbonate can

SC

be seen cementing sand grains together. (f-h) In many cases the new cements contain

NU

fossilized microcolonies. XFM scan conditions: pixel size: 2×2 µm, dwell time: 0.33 msec.

Figure 8. (a) XFM and BSE-SEM showing the Sr-Ca content and structure of a small region

MA

of the sample depicted in Fig. 6. Note, bright yellow regions indicate higher strontium content, while bright blue indicates higher calcium content. (b) In-filled microfossils of

D

filamentous cyanobacteria seen in longitudinal section along with new borings visible among

PT E

the microfossils. Most of the new carbonate contains microfossils (c-f) enclosed in EPS and infilled with micritic cement (f). XFM scan conditions: pixel size: 2×2 µm, dwell time: 0.33

CE

msec.

AC

Figure 9. (a) XFM highlighting the Sr-Ca content and (b) BSE-SEM micrograph of a Srenriched microbialite that formed in the FBR aquarium. Compared to (c) XFM and (d) BSESEM of a natural Heron Island beachrock microbialite, cementing detrital grains together. Note, in (a) and (c), bright yellow regions indicate higher strontium content, while bright blue indicates higher calcium content. XFM scan conditions: (a) pixel size: 2×2 µm, dwell time: 0.33 msec; (c) pixel size: 2×2 µm, dwell time: 1.0 msec.

23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 10. BSE-SEM micrographs with EDS demonstrating the structural and chemical heterogeneity of carbonate precipitates: a wheat-sheaf morphology as (a) a whole mount and (b) a thin section, interpreted as aragonite, and as nanometer-scale granules of carbonate precipitated on EPS in (c) a whole mount and (d) thin section. EDS spectra (e-g) demonstrate

PT

varying Mg-content.

RI

Figure 11. A cross-section of an embedded biofilm collected from the surface of the Sand

SC

aquarium after eight weeks viewed using (a) optical microscopy and (b) XFM. The bright yellow grains in (b) show the occurrence of new mineral nucleation, while the blue grains

NU

indicate trapping-and-binding. Bright yellow regions indicate higher strontium content, while bright blue indicates higher calcium content. XFM scan conditions: pixel size: 1×1 µm, dwell

MA

time: 1.0 msec.

D

References

AC

CE

PT E

Alexandersson, T., 1969. Recent littoral and sublittoral high-Mg calcite lithification in the Mediterranean. Sedimentology, 12(1-2): 47-61. Alexandersson, T., 1972. Intragranular growth of marine aragonite and Mg-calcite: Evidence of precipitation from supersaturated seawater. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 42(2): 441-460. Aloisi, G., 2008. The calcium carbonate saturation state in cyanobacterial mats throughout Earth’s history. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 72: 6037-6060. Altermann, W., Kazmierczak, J., Oren, A., Wright, D.T., 2006. Cyanobacterial calcification and its rock-building potential during 3.5 billion years of Earth history. Geobiology, 4: 147-166. Baker, A.C., Glynn, P.W., Riegl, B., 2008. Climate change and coral reef bleaching: An ecological assessment of long-term impacts, recovery trends and future outlook. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 80(4): 435-471. Banner, J.L., 1995. Application of the trace element and isotope geochemistry of strontium to studies of carbonate diagenesis. Sedimentology, 42(5): 805-824. Bathurst, R.G.C., 1966. Boring algae, micrite envelopes and lithification of molluscan biosparites. Geological Journal, 5(1): 15-32. Berner, R.A., 1975. The role of magnesium in the growth of calcite and aragonite from sea water. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 39: 489-504. Braissant, O., Decho, A.W., Dupraz, C., Glunk, C., Przekop, K.M., Visscher, P.T., 2007. Exopolymeric substances of sulfate-reducing bacteria: Interactions with calcium at

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

alkaline pH and implication for formation of carbonate minerals. Geobiology, 5: 401411. Braissant, O., Decho, A.W., Przekop, K.M., Gallagher, K.L., Glunk, C., Dupraz, C., Visscher, P.T., 2009. Characteristics and turnover of exopolymeric substances in a hypersaline microbial mat. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 67(2): 293-307. Bruun, P.M., 1962. Sea level rise as a cause of shore erosion. Journal of the Waterways, Harbors and Coastal Engineering Division, 88: 117-130. Calvet, F., Cabrera, M.C., Carracedo, J.C., Mangas, J., Pérez-Torrado, F.J., Recio, C., Travé, A., 2003. Beachrocks from the island of La Palma (Canary Islands, Spain). Marine Geology, 197(1–4): 75-93. Capo, R.C., Stewart, B.W., Chadwick, O.A., 1998. Strontium isotopes as tracers of ecosystem processes: theory and methods. Geoderma, 82(1–3): 197-225. Chazottes, V., Le Campion-Alsumard, T., Peyrot-Clausade, M., 1995. Bioerosion rates on coral reefs: Interactions between macroborers, microborers and grazers (Moorea, French Polynesia). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 113(2–4): 189-198. Cheal, A.J., MacNeil, M.A., Emslie, M.J., Sweatman, H., 2017. The threat to coral reefs from more intense cyclones under climate change. Global Change Biology: n/a-n/a. Chen, D.B., 2000. The hydrology and hydrogeology of Heron Island, the Great Barrier Reef: Modelling natural recharge and tidal groundwater flow in a coral cay, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia, 485 pp. Chivas, A., Chappell, J., Polach, H., Pillans, B., Flood, P., 1986. Radiocarbon evidence for the timing and rate of island development, beach-rock formation and phosphatization at Lady Elliot Island, Queensland, Australia. Marine Geology, 69(3–4): 273-287. Chowdhury, S.Q., Fazlul, A.T.M., Hasan, H.K., 1997. Beachrock in St. Martin's Island, Bangladesh: Implications of sea level changes on beachrock cementation. Marine Geodesy, 20(1): 89-104. Christiansen, T., Wiberg, P.L., Milligan, T.G., 2000. Flow and sediment transport on a tidal salt marsh surface. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 50(3): 315-331. Church, J.A., White, N.J., Hunter, J.R., 2006. Sea-level rise at tropical Pacific and Indian Ocean islands. Global and Planetary Change, 53(3): 155-168. Cockell, C.S., Herrera, A., 2008. Why are some microorganisms boring? Trends in Microbiology, 16(3): 101-106. Cooper, J.A.G., 1991. Beachrock formation in low latitudes: Implications for coastal evolutionary models. Marine Geology, 98(1): 145-154. Cooper, J.A.G., Pilkey, O.H., 2004. Sea-level rise and shoreline retreat: Time to abandon the Bruun Rule. Global and planetary change, 43(3): 157-171. Cowell, P.J., Kench, P.S., 2001. The morphological response of atoll islands to sea-level rise. Part 1: Modifications to the shoreface translation model. Journal of Coastal Research, 34: 633-644. CSIRO GeoPIXE software for PIXE and SXRF imaging. http://nmp.csiro.au/GeoPIXE.html (20/4/2016). Danjo, T., Kawasaki, S., 2013. A study of the formation mechanism of beachrock in Okinawa, Japan: Toward making artificial rock. International Journal of Geomate, 5(1): 634-639. Davies, P.J., Kinsey, D.W., 1973. Organic and inorganic factors in recent beach rock formation, Heron Island, Great Barrier Reef. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 43(1): 59-81.

25

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

Decho, A.W., Visscher, P.T., Reid, R.P., 2005. Production and cycling of natural microbial exopolymers (EPS) within a marine stromatolite. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 219(1–2): 71-86. Dickinson, W.R., 1999. Holocene sea-level record on Funafuti and potential impact of global warming on Central Pacific atolls. Quaternary Research, 51(2): 124-132. Díez, B., Bauer, K., Bergman, B., 2007. Epilithic cyanobacterial communities of a marine tropical beach rock (Heron Island, Great Barrier Reef): Diversity and diazotrophy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73(11): 3656-3668. Dupraz, C., Reid, R.P., Braissant, O., Decho, A.W., S., N.R., Visscher, L.K., 2009. Processes of carbonate precipitation in modern microbial mats. Earth-Science Reviews, 96: 141162. Dupraz, C., Visscher, P.T., 2005. Microbial lithification in marine stromatolites and hypersaline mats. Trends in Microbiology, 13: 429-438. Easton, W.H., 1974. An unusual inclusion in beachrock. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 44(3): 693-694. El-Sayed, M.K., 1988. Beachrock cementation in Alexandria, Egypt. Marine Geology, 80(1– 2): 29-35. Ferris, F.G., Phoenix, V., Fujita, Y., Smith, R.W., 2004. Kinetics of calcite precipitation induced by ureolytic bacteria at 10 to 20°C in artificial groundwater. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 68(8): 1701-1710. Flemming, H.-C., Wingender, J., 2010. The biofilm matrix. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 8(9): 623-633. Ford, M., 2012. Shoreline changes on an urban atoll in the Central Pacific Ocean: Majuro Atoll, Marshall Islands. Journal of Coastal Research: 11-22. Frankel, E., 1968. Rate of formation of beach rock. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 4(6): 439-440. Fuentes, M., Limpus, C., Hamann, M., Dawson, J., 2009. Potential impacts of projected sealevel rise on sea turtle rookeries. Aquatic conservation: marine and freshwater ecosystems, 20(2): 132-139. Fuentes, M.M.P.B., Limpus, C.J., Hamann, M., 2011. Vulnerability of sea turtle nesting grounds to climate change. Global Change Biology, 17(1): 140-153. Gallagher, K., Kading, T.J., Braissant, O., Dupraz, C., Visscher, P.T., 2012. Inside the alkalinity engine: The role of electron donors in the organomineralization potential of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Geobiology, 10: 518-530. Garcia-Pichel, F., Ramírez-Reinat, E., Gao, Q., 2010. Microbial excavation of solid carbonates powered by P-type ATPase-mediated transcellular Ca2+ transport. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(50): 21749-21754. Gedan, K.B., Kirwan, M.L., Wolanski, E., Barbier, E.B., Silliman, B.R., 2010. The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: Answering recent challenges to the paradigm. Climatic Change, 106(1): 7-29. Gibbons, S.J.A., Nicholls, R.J., 2006. Island abandonment and sea-level rise: An historical analog from the Chesapeake Bay, USA. Global Environmental Change, 16(1): 40-47. Ginsburg, R.N., 1953. Beachrock in south Florida. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 23(2): 85-92. Gischler, E., 2008. Beachrock and Intertidal Precipitates, Geochemical Sediments and Landscapes. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 365-390. Gischler, E., Lomando, A.J., 1997. Holocene cemented beach deposits in Belize. Sedimentary Geology, 110(3–4): 277-297. Google Earth, 2014. Heron, Island, GBR, Australia. In: DigitalGlobe (Editor). DigitalGlobe.

26

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

Gourlay, M.R., 1988. Coral cays: Products of wave action and geological processes in a biogenic environment. In: Choat, J.H. et al. (Editors), Proceedings of the 6th International Coral Reef Symposium, Townsville, Australia, pp. 491-496. Hanor, J.S., 1978. Precipitation of beachrock cements: Mixing of marine and meteoric water vs. CO2-degassing. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 48(2): 489-501. Harmelin-Vivien, M.L., 1994. The effects of storms and cyclones on coral reefs: A review. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 12: 211-231. Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Mumby, P.J., Hooten, A.J., Steneck, R.S., Greenfield, P., Gomez, E., Harvell, C.D., Sale, P.F., Edwards, A.J., Caldeira, K., Knowlton, N., Eakin, C.M., Iglesias-Prieto, R., Muthiga, N., Bradbury, R.H., Dubi, A., Hatziolos, M.E., 2007. Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science, 318(5857): 1737-1742. Jackson, J.B., Kirby, M.X., Berger, W.H., Bjorndal, K.A., Botsford, L.W., Bourque, B.J., Bradbury, R.H., Cooke, R., Erlandson, J., Estes, J.A., 2001. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. science, 293(5530): 629-637. Jell, J.S., Webb, G.E., 2012. Geology of Heron Island and adjacent reefs, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Episodes, 35(1): 110-119. Jonkers, H.M., Thijssen, A., Muyzer, G., Copuroglu, O., Schlangen, E., 2010. Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. Ecological Engineering, 36(2): 230-235. Kench, P.S., Brander, R.W., 2006a. Response of reef island shorelines to seasonal climate oscillations: South Maalhosmadulu atoll, Maldives. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 111(F1). Kench, P.S., Brander, R.W., 2006b. Wave processes on coral reef flats: Implications for reef geomorphology using Australian case studies. Journal of Coastal Research: 209-223. Kench, P.S., Harvey, N., 2003. Monitoring coastal change in Pacific atoll environments: The Pacific atoll coastal monitoring and analysis network (PACMAN), Proceedings of the Coasts and Ports Australasian Conference, Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 10. Kench, P.S., McLean, R.F., Brander, R.W., Nichol, S.L., Smithers, S.G., Ford, M.R., Parnell, K.E., Aslam, M., 2006. Geological effects of tsunami on mid-ocean atoll islands: The Maldives before and after the Sumatran tsunami. Geology, 34(3): 177-180. Kench, P.S., McLean, R.F., Nichol, S.L., 2005. New model of reef-island evolution: Maldives, Indian Ocean. Geology, 33(2): 145-148. Khan, M.N.H., Shimazaki, S., Kawasaki, S., 2016. Coral sand solidification test through microbial calcium carbonate precipitation using Pararhodobacter sp. International Journal, 11(26): 2665-2670. Khan, T.M.A., Quadir, D.A., Murty, T.S., Kabir, A., Aktar, F., Sarker, M.A., 2002. Relative sea level changes in Maldives and vulnerability of land due to abnormal coastal inundation. Marine Geodesy, 25(1-2): 133-143. Kindler, P., Bain, R.J., 1993. Submerged upper Holocene beachrock on San Salvador Island, Bahamas: implications for recent sea-level history. Geologische Rundschau, 82(2): 241-247. Körstgens, V., Flemming, H.-C., Wingender, J., Borchard, W., 2001. Influence of calcium ions on the mechanical properties of a model biofilm of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Water Science and Technology, 43(6): 49-57. Krumbein, W.E., 1979. Phototrophic and chemoorganotrophic activity of bacteria and algae as related to beachrock formation and degradation (Gulf-of-Aqaba, Sinai). Geomicrobiology Journal, 1(2): 139-203.

27

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

Kuroyanagi, A., Kawahata, H., Suzuki, A., Fujita, K., Irie, T., 2009. Impacts of ocean acidification on large benthic foraminifers: Results from laboratory experiments. Marine Micropaleontology, 73(3–4): 190-195. Larson, M., Kraus, N.C., 2000. Representation of non-erodible (hard) bottoms in beach profile change modeling. Journal of Coastal Research, 16(1): 1-14. Macintyre, I.G., Prufert-Bebout, L., Reid, R.P., 2000. The role of endolithic cyanobacteria in the formation of lithified laminae in Bahamian stromatolites. Sedimentology, 47(5): 915-921. Maragos, J.E., Baines, G.B., Beveridge, P.J., 1973. Tropical cyclone Bebe creates a new land formation on Funafuti Atoll. Science, 181(4105): 1161-1164. Margolis, S., Rex, R.W., 1971. Endolithic Algae and Micrite Envelope Formation in Bahamian Oölites as Revealed by Scanning Electron Microscopy. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 82(4): 843-852. Mauz, B., Vacchi, M., Green, A., Hoffmann, G., Cooper, A., 2015. Beachrock: A tool for reconstructing relative sea level in the far-field. Marine Geology, 362: 1-16. Maxwell, W.G.H., 1962. Lithification of carbonate sediments in the Heron Island Reef, Great Barrier Reef. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 8(2): 217-238. McCutcheon, J., Nothdurft, L., Webb, G.E., Paterson, D., Southam, G., 2016. Beachrock formation via microbial dissolution and re-precipitation of carbonate minerals. Marine Geology, 382: 122-135. McLean, R.F., Tsyban, A., 2001. Coastal zones and marine ecosystems. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press. Meyers, J.H., 1987. Marine vadose beachrock cementation by cryptocrystalline magnesian calcite - Maui, Hawaii. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 57(3): 558-570. Mimura, N., 1999. Vulnerability of island countries in the South Pacific to sea level rise and climate change. Climate research, 12(2-3): 137-143. Mimura, N., Nurse, L., McLean, R.F., Agard, J., Briguglio, L., Lefale, P., Sem, G., 2007. Small islands, Cambridge, UK. Mitchell, A.C., Ferris, F.G., 2006. The Influence of Bacillus pasteurii on the Nucleation and Growth of Calcium Carbonate. Geomicrobiology Journal, 23(3-4): 213-226. Möller, I., Spencer, T., French, J.R., Leggett, D.J., Dixon, M., 1999. Wave transformation over salt marshes: A field and numerical modelling study from North Norfolk, England. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 49(3): 411-426. Moore, C.H., 1973. Intertidal carbonate cementation, Grand Cayman, West Indies. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 43(3): 591-602. Neumeier, U., 1999. Experimental modelling of beachrock cementation under microbial influence. Sedimentary Geology, 126(1–4): 35-46. Nicholls, R.J., Wong, P.P., Burkett, V., Codignotto, J., Hay, J., McLean, R., Ragoonaden, S., Woodroffe, C.D., Abuodha, P., Arblaster, J., 2007. Coastal systems and low-lying areas. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. Novitsky, J.A., 1981. Calcium-carbonate precipitation by marine-bacteria. Geomicrobiology Journal, 2(4): 375-388. Pandolfi, J.M., Bradbury, R.H., Sala, E., Hughes, T.P., Bjorndal, K.A., Cooke, R.G., McArdle, D., McClenachan, L., Newman, M.J., Paredes, G., Warner, R.R., Jackson, J.B., 2003. Global trajectories of the long-term decline of coral reef ecosystems. Science, 301(5635): 955-8. Pandolfi, J.M., Connolly, S.R., Marshall, D.J., Cohen, A.L., 2011. Projecting coral reef futures under global warming and ocean acidification. Science, 333(6041): 418-422. 28

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

Parkhurst, D.L., Appelo, C.A.J., 1999. User's guide to PHREEQC (version 2) - A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport and inverse geochemical calculations, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver. Paterson, D., de Jonge, M.D., Howard, D.L., Lewis, W., McKinlay, J., Starritt, A., Kusel, M., Ryan, C.G., Kirkham, R., Moorhead, G., Siddons, D.P., 2011. The X-ray fluorescence microscopy beamline at the Australian Synchrotron, AIP Conference Proceedings, Chicago, USA, pp. 219−222. Perry, C.T., 2000. Factors controlling sediment preservation on a North Jamaican fringing reef: A process-based approach to microfacies analysis. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 70(3): 633-648. Perry, C.T., Kench, P.S., Smithers, S.G., Riegl, B., Yamano, H., O'Leary, M.J., 2011. Implications of reef ecosystem change for the stability and maintenance of coral reef islands. Global Change Biology, 17(12): 3679-3696. Pike, D.A., Roznik, E.A., Bell, I., 2015. Nest inundation from sea-level rise threatens sea turtle population viability. Open Science, 2(7). Poloczanska, E.S., Limpus, C.J., Hays, G.C., 2009. Chapter 2. Vulnerability of marine turtles to climate change, Advances in Marine Biology. Academic Press, pp. 151-211. Ramsay, P.J., Cooper, J.A.G., 2002. Late Quaternary sea-level change in South Africa. Quaternary Research, 57(1): 82-90. Ries, J.B., Anderson, M.A., Hill, R.T., 2008. Seawater Mg/Ca controls polymorph mineralogy of microbial CaCO3: a potential proxy for calcite-aragonite seas in Precambrian time. Geobiology, 6(2): 106-19. Ries, J.B., Cohen, A.L., McCorkle, D.C., 2009. Marine calcifiers exhibit mixed responses to CO2-induced ocean acidification. Geology, 37(12): 1131-1134. Roy, P., Connell, J., 1991. Climatic change and the future of atoll states. Journal of Coastal Research: 1057-1075. Russell, R.J., McIntire, W.G., 1965. Southern hemisphere beach rock. Geographical Review, 55(1): 17-45. Ryan, C.G., Siddons, D.P., Kirkham, R., Dunn, P.A., Kuczewski, A., Moorhead, G., De Geronimo, G., Paterson, D.J., de Jonge, M.D., Hough, R.M., Lintern, M.J., Howard, D.L., Kappen, P., Cleverley, J., 2010. The new Maia detector system: Methods for high definition trace element imaging of natural material. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1221(1): 9-17. Ryan, C.G., Siddons, D.P., Kirkham, R., Li, Z.Y., Jonge, M.D.d., Paterson, D.J., Kuczewski, A., Howard, D.L., Dunn, P.A., Falkenberg, G., Boesenberg, U., Geronimo, G.D., Fisher, L.A., Halfpenny, A., Lintern, M.J., Lombi, E., Dyl, K.A., Jensen, M., Moorhead, G.F., Cleverley, J.S., Hough, R.M., Godel, B., Barnes, S.J., James, S.A., Spiers, K.M., Alfeld, M., Wellenreuther, G., Vukmanovic, Z., Borg, S., 2014. Maia X-ray fluorescence imaging: Capturing detail in complex natural samples. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 499(1): 012002. Schwartz, M.L., 1967. The Bruun Theory of sea-level rise as a cause of shore erosion. The Journal of Geology, 75(1): 76-92. Scoffin, T.P., Stoddart, D.R., 1983. Beachrock and intertidal cements. In: Goudie, A.S., Pye, K. (Eds.), Chemical Sediments and Geomorphology: Precipitates and Residua in the Near-Surface Environment. Academic, London, pp. 401-425. Sheppard, C., Dixon, D.J., Gourlay, M., Sheppard, A., Payet, R., 2005. Coral mortality increases wave energy reaching shores protected by reef flats: Examples from the Seychelles. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 64(2–3): 223-234.

29

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

Spalding, M.D., Ruffo, S., Lacambra, C., Meliane, I., Hale, L.Z., Shepard, C.C., Beck, M.W., 2014. The role of ecosystems in coastal protection: Adapting to climate change and coastal hazards. Ocean & Coastal Management, 90: 50-57. Stoddart, D.R., 1963. Effects of Hurricane Hattie on the British Honduras reefs and cays. Atoll Research Bulletin, 95: 1-142. Sumer, B.M., Fredsøe, J., Lamberti, A., Zanuttigh, B., Dixen, M., Gislason, K., Di Penta, A.F., 2005. Local scour at roundhead and along the trunk of low crested structures. Coastal Engineering, 52(10–11): 995-1025. Tatumi, S.H., Kowata, E.A., Gozzi, G., Kassab, L.R.P., Suguio, K., Barreto, A.M.F., Bezerra, F.H.R., 2003. Optical dating results of beachrock, eolic dunes and sediments applied to sea-level changes study. Journal of Luminescence, 102–103(0): 562-565. Van Houtan, K.S., Bass, O.L., 2007. Stormy oceans are associated with declines in sea turtle hatching. Current Biology, 17(15): R590-R591. Vonshak, A., 1986. Laboratory techniques for the cultivation of microalgae. In: Richmond, A. (Ed.), CRC handbook of microalgae mass culture. CRC Press Inc., Bocca Raton, pp. 117. Vousdoukas, M.I., Velegrakis, A.F., Plomaritis, T.A., 2007. Beachrock occurrence, characteristics, formation mechanisms and impacts. Earth-Science Reviews, 85(1-2): 23-46. Webb, A.P., Kench, P.S., 2010. The dynamic response of reef islands to sea-level rise: Evidence from multi-decadal analysis of island change in the Central Pacific. Global and Planetary Change, 72(3): 234-246. Webb, G.E., Jell, J.S., 1997. Biosedimentology of Microbial Buildups IGCP Project No. 380 Proceedings of 2nd Meeting, Göttingen/Germany 1996. Facies, 36(1): 219-223. Webb, G.E., Jell, J.S., Baker, J.C., 1999. Cryptic intertidal microbialites in beachrock, Heron Island, Great Barrier Reef: implications for the origin of microcrystalline beachrock cement. Sedimentary Geology, 126(1-4): 317-334. Wiktor, V., Jonkers, H.M., 2011. Quantification of crack-healing in novel bacteria-based selfhealing concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 33(7): 763-770. Woodroffe, C.D., 2008. Reef-island topography and the vulnerability of atolls to sea-level rise. Global and Planetary Change, 62(1–2): 77-96. Woodroffe, C.D., Samosorn, B., Hua, Q., Hart, D.E., 2007. Incremental accretion of a sandy reef island over the past 3000 years indicated by component‐specific radiocarbon dating. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(3): L03602. Yamano, H., Kayanne, H., Yamaguchi, T., Kuwahara, Y., Yokoki, H., Shimazaki, H., Chikamori, M., 2007. Atoll island vulnerability to flooding and inundation revealed by historical reconstruction: Fongafale Islet, Funafuti Atoll, Tuvalu. Global and Planetary Change, 57(3–4): 407-416. Yamano, H., Miyajima, T., Koike, I., 2000. Importance of foraminifera for the formation and maintenance of a coral sand cay: Green Island, Australia. Coral Reefs, 19(1): 51-58. Zhang, K., Douglas, B.C., Leatherman, S.P., 2004. Global warming and coastal erosion. Climatic Change, 64(1): 41-58.

30

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC

CE

Fig. 1

31

AC

Fig. 2

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

32

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 3

33

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 4

34

Fig. 5

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

35

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 6

36

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC

CE

PT E

D

Fig. 7

37

Fig. 8

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

38

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 9

39

AC

Fig. 10

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

40

NU

SC

RI

PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

Fig. 11

41

RI

PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

Graphical Abstract

42