BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 52, No. 4, 1973
CARBON-13
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
NUCLEAR YiGNETIC
RESONANCE SPECTRA
OF LIGNINS H.-D.Liidemnnn Lehrstuhl
fiir
Regensburg,
Physik, D-84
Fachbereich
Regensburg,
Biologic,
Universitgt
UniversitatsstraBe
31
and H.Nimz Polymer-Institut
der D-75
Universitat
Karlsruhe,
Karlsruhe, Hertzstr.16
Germany Received
April
5, 1973
SUMMARY: From the 'SC-nmr spectra of a large number of dimeric and monomeric lignin model compounds the chemical shifts of the carbon atoms of the Ce-units in lignin with different substitution patterns were determined. The spectra of two lignins absorption peaks of the carbon-13 (beech and spruce) could be assigned by comparison (Table After
cellulose,
natural
units.
various
with
the
means
isolation
kinds
lignin.3
Based
structural this
paper
method
of
tution
of beech
propane
structure
which
the
results
"Ca-units"
high
thirty it
on the
dimeric
could
lignin
spectroscopy our
and spruce
chemical lignins.
bonds, From
and oligomeric
between of
connected
polymera
be shown that
exist
yields
of beech
13C-nmr
dimensional
from
are
three
of bonds
completing
polymeric
or by carbon-oxygen
about
scheme
abundant
by carbon-carbon
products
different
most
of p-hydroxy-phenyl
through
of
the
complicated
a cross-linked
degradation
In
' Its
one another
giving
is
consisting
product,
structural the
lignin
the
at
least
ten in
products
was recently was chosen
In
lignin
Ca-units
degradation
results
3).
a
proposed.4 as a physical
on the comparison
constiwith
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 52, No, 4,1973
'H-nmr
spectroscopy
advantages range
a twenty
sharpening
spruce In
order
to
get
the
were
solutions
gradually with
adding
agitation
crude
discrete by means
dures
or obtained
by lignin
'X-spectra
were
blocks
of 1000
transients
the
-CD,
Shift
values
to
of the the
quoted
RESULTL Figs.
1 and
beech
lignin,
lines
of the
2 show the respectively.
lignins,
by
(9:l)
solutions,
-,Dimeric
lignin
standard
mixtures
by means
9:l)
at
25.2
of
proce-
ppm).
are noise
of
The
acetone
(resp.
a Varian
XL-
in the
the
spectra
spectrometer (resp.
in
(9:l)
the
Fourier-
decoupled.
100
longis
was locked
-CDs-
as an internal
given
of the
MHz by the
accumulated
of dioxane). reference.
TMS scale.
AND DISCUSSION 13C-nmr In
the
ligninfrom
to the
to
water
solutions are
the
of 2oo/o W/W solutions
were
0.2
groups
TMS was added
mixer.
The resolution
+3 Hz (approximately
Bjijrkman.'
on alumina
of benzene
The protons
-term-averaging-mode.
to
taken
operating
-transform-technique.
to
and
degradation.
water,
spectrometer
-100-15
according
according
deuteroacetone/heavy
deuterodioxane/heavy
silvatica)
dioxane/water
of a vibro
were prepared
in
shift
(Fagus
precipitated
amounts
compounds
lignins
chemical
carbohydrates,
MWLs in
model
The
from
were
of the
convincing
decoupling.
prepared
MWLs free
-carbohydrate-complexes the
wider
(MWL) of beech
excelsa)
offers
AND METHODS
wood lignins (Picea
fold
by proton
MATERIALS Milled
5 'XC!-nmr
of lignins,
regarding
and line
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
order
'%-spectra 1163
spectra to of
of
spruce
assign eighteen
the
and absorption dimeric
and
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 52, No. 4, 1973
12 IL 200
3
L
S-10
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
11-16l7-222232L
25-30
,,,I,,,
I
31-3435
I,,, 100
150
36
@
@
37
I 50
I,
,
I 0
-6K
Fig.
1:
seven
'SC-nmr spectrum (R) = TMS.
monomeric
parison. shifts
From of
as tney
There
are
atoms the
in
from
with
aliphatic
in
the
to 105
and the
the
for
com-
chemical
and C-S)
atoms
of
the
sp2 carbon
other
groups
from
determined.
one covering
and the
methoxy
pat-
were
spectra, (C-a
88 and 20 ppm downfield
taken
(I-III),
ppm,
= aceton,
substitution
Cg-units
sp3 carbon
to C-y)
for
a ligninlike
the
(S)
were
values
andolefinic
160
lignin.
compounds the
regions
to C-6)
(C-l
saturated
between
atoms
two main
(C-a
model spectra
exist
ranging
chains
these
carbon
tern,
aromatic
lignin
of beech
covering
the
propane
with
chemical
side shifts
TMS.
Y-FB-ya-CI:
II: OH The C-6)
III:
chemical
depend
on
shifts the
of
the
R'
= R2 = H
R'
= OCH,,
R'
= R2 = OCH3
R2 = H
aromatic
carbon
in
aromatic
substituents
1164
the
atoms ring,
(C-l
to
on the
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 52, No. 4, 1973
12
I
3
Fig.
2:
n-i6i7---22
s-10
is
Table
or not
1 it
has no influence
the to
ortho the
carbon
para shifted
methoxy
group
atoms
6 (-15
field
shift
is
the
of C-l even
C-2 (C-6,
downfield in
III
ppm),
effects
(-16
carbon
4 (-11
at the
2, 4, upfield smaller
the
atom
of
in
II,
that
shifts causes ppm)
ring
ppm).
in value,
phenolic
hydroxy
group
of both
meta-positions
an upfield
Similarly shifts
at
to
carbon
atoms
substituents
chemical
instead
when C-a is 1165
second
the
carbon
to and of
and a down-
to
are
an olefinic
C-6
are
When C-a of
of the
to +5 ppm)
The same effects
the
C-l
shifts (+2
shift
II.7
at C-a.
group
II
absorption
ppm),
relative
in
ppm)
(-11
the
and 2 (-7
and 6 move downfield (-6
= aceton,
methoxy
while
upfield ppm),
the
and C-4
ppm).
a carbonyl the
the
-8 ppm),
causes
(S)
1).
but
(+32
when altering
or a HCOR-group atoms
atoms
I,
of +33 ppm at C-5,
Smaller observed
to
position
C-3 is
(Table
I
w
lignin.
whether
chemical
relative
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
31-3C3536
spruce
fact,
can be seen on the
and C-5))
(C-l
of
and on the
alkylated
From
25-30
'SC-nmr spectrum (R) = TMS;
C-a substituents group
AND BIOPHYSICAL
a HCOHcarbon
and that observed,
but
or a tertiary
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 52, No. 4, 1973
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Table 1: Chemical shifts and differences in chemical shifts of the aromatic carbon atoms (C-l to C-6) of the Cg-units (I-III) in ppm. For further details see text. a-HCOH(R)
C-u in: C9-unit
I
C-l
a-C=0
II
III
II
III
II
III
II
-4
+3 +I
+4
+3 +5
+I
+I
0
0
+5
-2 +5
+I +2
+2 0 +2
0 0 +3
+3 -1 0
+3 +5 0
134 105
-6 +2
c-3
116
148
149
c-4 c-5 C-6
158 116 128
147 116 120
136 149 105
2: Chemical shifts of the propylic (C-a to C-y) of the &-units (I-III) ty-pe
c-a
side in C-6
chain ppm. c-y
Ar-YH-YH-CH20H OH O-C-4'
(IV)
73
87
62
Ar-CH-CH-CH20H &H k-1'
0)
65
64
75
01)
88
54
65
CH-YHp (VII) &+ O-C-a '
87
55
72
40
47
73
YH-CH2011
O-C-4'
Ar-CH&c-,,
C-5'
Ar-CII2-$-YHp C-6 '
(VIII) o-c-y
'
Ar-YH-YH-C02R C-6' C-a'
(IX)
59
43
173
Ar-yH-CH2-CO2R c-p '
co
52
38
173
Ar-CH=CH-C02H
(XI >
146
116
170
154
132
195
131
127
63
(XIV)
195
83
64
on
192
Ar-CH-CH-CHO Ar-CH=CH-CH20H Ar-CO-CH-CH20H
(XII
>
(XIII)
b-C-4'
Ar-CHO
III
-3 +3
134 112
Ar-YH-
C-4-OR
-1
134 128
Structural
a-HC-C
+2
c-2
Table atoms
a-H&C
1166
carbon
0
Vol. 52, No. 4, 1973
Table
BIOCHEMICAL
3: Assignment of absorption Figs. 1 and 2.
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
lines
+> Intensity beech spruce (1)
(2)
195.2 192.7 171.8
w
W
‘W
W VW
(3) (4)
162.0
m VW
(5) (6)
154.5 152.9
s VW
W
(7)
150.6
w
S
(8)
148.5
m
S
(9)
146.6
w
In
(10)
144.8
v-w
(11)
138.7
m
(12)
136.0
m
(13)
133.6
(14)
132.7
w w
m VW m m VW
(15)
130.2
w
W
(16) (17)
129.0 126.7
7JW
(18)
120.1
m
S
(79)
117.5
w
m
(20)
115.6
m
S
(21)
113.8
VW
W
(22)
112.0
m
S
(23)
107.1
(24)
105.1
(25)
88.1
VW
W
(26)
86.8
s
W
(27)
w
m
(28)
85.8 81-83
w
VW
m
w
m VW
m vs
w
W
(29)
75.0
(30)
73.3
vs
s
(31)
63.8 61.3
m vs
m
(32) (33)
56.3
vs
(34) (35) (36)
54.5 52.3 46.8
VW VW
(37)
20.8
m
+)Intensity:
w
VW
S
vs W
VW VW w=weak,
in
the
lignin
spectra
of
Assignment a-C=0 in XIV, y-CHO in XII a-CHO in XV O-C=0 in aliphatic esters C-4 in I (alkylated at C-4) C-3 and C-5 in III (alkylated at C-4) C-a in XII C-4 in II with a-C=0 C-4 in II (alkylated), C-i; in II (a-C=O) C-3 in II, C-3, C-5 in III, C-l in biphenyls C-4 in II, C-a in XI C-4' in VI C-4 and C-l in III (alkylated) C-l in II (aikylated), C-4 in III C-l in I-III C-B in XII C-l with C-a in HC=C or HC-C (= C-l' in V) C-2 and C-6 in I C-8 in XIII C-6 in II C-6' in VI C-5 in II, C-3 and C-5 in I, C-8 in XI C-2 in II (with a-C=O, a-HC-C) C-2 in II C-Z and C-6 in III (with a-C=O, a-HC-C) C-2 and C-6 in III C-a in VI C-p in IV, C-a in VII (syringaresinol-type) C-a in VII (pinoresinol-type) C-8 in XIV C-y in V C-a in IV, C-y in VII and VIII C-a and C-8 in V, C-y in XIII and XIV C-y in IV OCH, C-8 in VI and VII C-a in X C-P in VIII acetoxy-CH3 m=medium,s=strong, vw=very weak, vs=very strong 1167
Vol. 52, No. 4, 1973
carbon
atom
hydroxy about
(cf.
group
in
The C-R,
in
II
Table
patterns,
the
for
which
data
spectra
is
lignin
(Fig.
spruce
to C-2 the
II
of
(cf.
last
the
Table
strong
carbon
lignin
two lignin
atoms
C-d,
between
the
absorption
peak
105 ppm (24)
in
the
(Fig.
2).
As this
absorption
units in
(III)
spruce
spectroscopy
distinguishing
between
at
spectrum
missing
j3C-nmr
of Figs.
difference
completely
units
assignment
3.
is
such
substitution
spectra
which
and C-S 0-f syringyl of
chain
2.
at 107 ppm (23)
lignin
for
to
shi.X
1 and 2 a preliminary
in
in
very
Therefore
method
relative
side
Table
of Tables
I),
absence
ted.
in
lines
the
a shoulder
phenclic
a weak downfield
on typical
characteristic
with
of
of the depend
proposed
The most
causes
of the
C-i+ and C-l,
listed
37 absorption
and 2 is
- Alkyiation
mainly
shifts
are
From
1).
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
1).
chemical
and C-y,
for
Table
+3 ppm both
column
1
BIOCHEMICAL
in
two lignin
of beech in
the
peak lignin
spectrum is
assigned
(cf.
Table
lignin
is
offers
an outstanding
hardwood
clearly
indica-
and softwood
iignins. The rather ppm (2) groups
weak but
indicate
at least
to be present
absorption
peak
lignin,
which should
atoms,
possibly the
beech
(37)
in
lignin. research
in
at is
171.8
assigned
be regarded
result
from
lignin. beech
distinct
Further
both
and will
lignins
ppm (3) to
in
spectrum ester
ester the
of lignin later. 1168
carbonyl 3).
The
of beech
carbonyl
carbon it
could
contaminating line
by substances '3C-nmr
192.7
and
because
groups
absorption
of
Table
some caution,
polyuronic
be published
the
aliphatic
with
(1)
types (cf.
may be caused
details
at 195.2
two different
Similarly lignin
peaks
spectra
at
20.8
ppm
other
than
are
under
3),
Vol. 52, No. 4, 1973
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
REFERENCES K.V.Sarkanen and C.H.Ludwig, "Lignins, Occurrence, Formation, Structure,and Reactions", WiLey-Interscience, New York - London - Sydney - Toronto 1977. "Constitution and Biosynthesis 2. K.Preudenberg and A.C.Neish, Berlin - Heidelberg - New York of Lignin, Springer-Verlag,
1.
1968.
3. H.Nim:z and K.Das, Chem. Ber. 104, 2359 (1971). 4. H.Nim,z, TapDi, in press. 5. C.H.Ludwig, B.J.Nist, and J.L.McCarthy, J.Amer. Chem. 86, 1186, 1196 (1964). 6. A.BjGrkman, Svensk Papperstidn. 59, 477 (1956). 7. For comparison see: P.C.Lauterbur, J.Amer. Chem. Sot. 3, 1846 (1961).
1169
Sot.