BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 71, No. 1,1976
CARBOXINS:
POWERFUL
SUCCINATE P.C.
Biology
SELECTIVE
OXIDATION
Mowery,
Molecular
AND BIOPHYSICAL
IN
B.A.C.
ANIMAL and
Veterans
OF
TISSUES T.P.
Singer
Administration
San Francisco, California 94121 and Biophysics, University of California,
and
INHIBITORS
Ackrell,
Division,
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Hospital,
Department of Biochemistry San Francisco, California
94143
and G .A. Agriculture
Received
White
and
Canada, Research London, N6A
G D . Thorn
Institute, University 387 I 0 ntario, Canada
Sub
Post Office,
May 14,1976
Summary: Carboxin (5 ,bdihydro-2-methyl1,4-oxathiin-3-carboxanilide) is a systemic fungicide, reported to inhibit succinate oxidation in certain fungi, particularly Ustilago ma dis (corn smut). In the present study the action of carboxin and of other oxa+- erivatives on beef heart succinate dehydrogenase has been investigated. Carboxins inhibited the same activities to the same extent as thenoyltrifluoroacetone (TTF) but at much lower concentrations. For 14 carboxin derivatives the inhibition constants (concentration required to inhibit 5% of the carboxin-sensitive activity) ranged from 2 x lo-* to 2 x 10-6,M. Like TTF, carboxin derivatives did not inhibit soluble succinate dehydrogenase butinhibited the reduction of coenzyme Q analogs, of 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol, and of phenazine methosulfate (PMS) in Complex II preparations. The same reactions and succinoxidase activity were also inhibited in inner membranes (ETP). In ETP only % 50 % of the succinate-PMS activity was carboxin sensitive, the same fraction as is’inhibited by TTF or is lost on extraction of coenzyme Q and on incubation with cyanide. While the inhibition of PMS reduction by carboxin was largely or entirely competitive in Complex II, it was predominantly non-competitive in ETP at low concentrations. Some other carboxin derivatives gave mixed inhibition patterns for PMS reduction in ETP even at low inhibitor concentrations. The complex inhibition pattern in the PMS assay seems more compatible with conformation changes affecting activity than with loss of a reaction site for PMS .
Carboxin nuda
and
Rhizoctonia
cornsmut
(U. -
denitrificans
the
genetic the
Copyright All rights
solani
have
oxidation primary
(1).
inhibition
shown is in the
reaction
studies
a striking
fungicide
maydis)(2,3), (4)
succinate that
is a systemic
with
with
yeast
that
the
to the
0 1976 by Academic Press, Inc. in any form reserved.
of reproduction
(3),
and
membranes
by carboxin
of the
of U.
354
maydis
paper
in Ustilago
fungi,
for blocking
chain.
II region (5).
Further has come
The
preparations describes
particularly
Micrococcus
responsible
respiratory
in fungal
The present
metabolism
from
of carboxin
is in the Complex mutants
of TTF.
succinate carboxin-sensitive
with site
II region
of carboxin
action
with
inhibition
Complex
oxidation
to inhibit
Investigations
carboxin-resistant
of succinate similarity
site
known
evidence from
characteristics (2,3) the
of
suggested
inhibition
of
VoL71,No.
beef
1,1976
heart
ranging
BIOCHEMICAL
succinate from
dehydrogenase
inner
membranes
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
by a series (ETP)
to the
MATERIALS
RESEARCH
of carboxin
purified, AND
COMMUNICATIONS
derivatives
soluble
in preparations
enzyme.
METHODS
ETP and Complex II and reconstitutively active, butanol extracted succinate dehydrogenase were isolated as previously described (6-8). Activities were measured in fully activated preparations: succinate-PMS reaction with DCIP as terminal acceptor (9), DCIP reduction under the same conditions but without PMS present, succinoxidase polarographically. The reduction of the Q analog, DPB (2,3-dimethoxy+methyl-6-pentyl-1,4benzoquinone) was measured with DCIP as terminal acceptor under the conditions of the PMS-DCIP assay (9) but with 39 uM DPB in lieu of variable concentration of PMS and “low K ” ferricyanide activity (l~spectrophotometrically. DPB was obtained from Dr. Karl Fon
of the succinate-DPB --
known
tives
by succinate
with
DPB,
succinate while Linear
for
many
in Complex
which
II (12).
plots, carboxin
Complex
produced indicating and
DCIP
reductase
activity
three
inhibitors
produced
succinate-DCIP
TTF
completely present
Q,
in this
II was
~95%
comparable saturation
TTF,
1.5
of Complex complete
to
study assay
inhibition
reduction
The
highly
with
of Q deriva-
0.3
non-competitive
assayed
of DPB
concentration. Ki uM-
values
at 15O
The
succinatc-
.
to inhibition. kinetics
Jii
and
All linear
e
24.0
.
200
2
160
12.0
00
.
40
0
0
mw
20
40
6.0
PMS
Fig. 1. Effect of 3’-methylcarboxin on membrane-bound succinate dehydrogenase. Ordinate, unu les of succinate oxidized/min/mg of protein at 38’. A. ETP (turnover number = 19,400 at 38O); inhibitor concentrations: 1, none; 2, 0.05 uM; 3, 0.15 @; 4, 1.5 uM; 5, 5.0 uM. 8. Complex II (turnover number= 10,800); T no inhibitor; 2, 0.84 3 3’-methyTarboxin.
355
by
TTF or carboxin,
giving
sensitive
was
reduction
at 7 to 10 uMobtained,
in Complex
activity
at 60 uM -
3’-methylcarboxin,
II was similarly
activities --
Q reductase
inhibited
were
:JM; -
the
(13).
inhibition
kinetics, 1.9
reductase inhibits
In the
replaces
- activated
3’ -methylcarboxin
as follows:
that
quantitatively
in NO;
Dixon
years
and -
II.
Vol.
BIOCHEMICAL
71, No.
1,1976
plots.
The
Dixon
methylcarboxin,
and
petitive
and
with
calculated
for
number
observed JO,OOO).
and
cyanide
branes.
(15)
All
value
these
(*
A number
10,000)
were
Ki
values
different
from
As shown at 15’
in typical
Complex
in Complex
oxidation
effect however,
inhibition
lead
of these from
compounds that
observed
was non-competitive
point 2),
a competitive the
same
as with
to loss of about
treatments
reduce
seen
in typical
the
derivatives
Titration of succinate-PMS (A) at 38’. The ordinate
appeared
TTF.
Extraction
of the
turnover
have
number
concentrations DPB,
1A).
of ETP ( s 20,000
and in
of Complex
high
activity
of
reaction
samples
of Q10
numbers
II
concentraMaximal
(14) in
or incubation inner
mem-
+ 1,000)
to
II preparations. been
compared
CONCENTRATION,
activity represents
turnover
succinate-PMS
PMS-DCIP
3,‘-
a turnover
of DCIP,
(Fig.
uIvJ;
those
having
low
in typical
feature
1.1
to
reduction
up to a relatively
half
Complex
on the
is com-
similar
higher
reduction
in the
of PMS
(preparations
the
II,
inhibition
TTF,
inhibition
In ETP preparations
inhibited
in Complex
the
pIvJ;
3’-
Carboxin,3’-
very
with
PM; -
observed
lA,
to 1.5
II samples
in -- ETP.
completely The
of carboxin
II preparations
1.1
II.
nevertheless
of the
below,
TTF,
pattern
in Fig.
were
COMMUNICATIONS
by succinate the
character
INHIBITOR
Fig. 2. carboxin
of PMS
competitive
.
(Fig. also
reduction
PM; -
in Complex
The
PM -
at which
was ~50%
activity
1.4
different,
of inhibitor,
the
to 0.9
carboxin,
3’-methylcarboxin
In ETP the
0.7
RESEARCH
reduction:
activity.
1B).
The
As shown
markedly
carboxin,
reactions.
for DCIP
of succinate
inhibition
the
inhibition
Inhibition
ETP was
with
of the
was observed.
succinoxidase
tion
inhibited
and
BIOPHYSICAL
reductase
also
inhibition
carboxin
were:
succinate-PMS
to PMS.
0.3
of
15”
succinate-DCIP
DPB
regularly
(Fig.
PM. -
llF
respect
methylca&oxin,
mixed
to 0.4
characteristics
succinate-DPB
was
at
of -- the
methylcarboxin, the
values
0.3
Inhibition
but
Ki
AND
for
in inhibiting
,uUM
of ETP with carboxin Vmax (PMS) , based
356
effectiveness
(0) and 3’-methylon the data of Fig.
1A.
Vol.
71, No.
BIOCHEMICAL
1,1976
24.0
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
t
012345 [PMS,
Fig. 3. turnover
the
Effect number
of 4’-phenoxycarboxin of the ETP used
succinate-PMS
competitive tive
reaction
kinetics
inhibition
attained
(Fig.
and
was
in the
In comparing from
Dixon
thus
the
plots
when
inhibition
(12,,.)
and
particular
compound
curved
scale
of potencies
a part
of the
measured
all
Dixon
plots.
however
Some (Fig.
inhibitors
(Table
I inear.
In addition,
the
50?? (Table
by modifying
is susceptible
of them
showed
non-
produced
The
maximal
1A.
uncompetiinhibition
I).
carboxins,
giving
of them
3).
of various
calculated
activity
most
potency
concentration
is possible
activity of ETP at 38’. The concentrations were as in Fig.
concentrations
plots,
for
were
were
low
linear
inhibitory
( Iso)
lative
At
Dixon
of 5&b
these
the
ETP.
1A) and
range
on succinate-PMS 18,000; inhibitor
was
in
mM]-’
Ki
values
concentrations
loss of the I).
Another
the
Hill
activity
were
calculated
giving
25%
inhibitable
basis
by
for establishing
equation
to fit
cases
the a re-
where
only
to inhibition: zE - T
log K - nlogi=log
z(T-E)’ where
T is the
particular of the and
activity
inhibitor fraction
of the
of inhibitor-resistant to last
As seen
in Table
methods inhibitors
different gave than
column) I, from
gratifyingly TTF
and
with the
inhibition
apparent
in Table
exceptions
carboxin
Ki values
ranged
357
for
n (a measure
the
K values
determined
All
values.
and
presence
of a
z the
reciprocal
of cooperativity)
I.
where
constants
in the
of inhibitor,
Values
included
three
similar the
concentration
activity. are
E the activity
enzyme,
i the
concentration,
of K (next
significantly
uninhibited
by other
derivatives from
from
plots
means,
were
2 x lOmE
Hill
more
to 2 x 10
were
the -ytent - M.
four
Vol.
71, No.
BIOCHEMICAL
1,1976
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
TABLE COMPARISON AND
OF
OF
THE
POTENCY
SUCCINATE
OF
Inhibitor
assay
cC oncentration plot.
eKi
reported t ions
at 38’
from
from
Dixon
TTF but
heart.
of PMS-DCIP
OF
nd
ETPa
Kd
Ke
(IJ~
(lg
9.0 3.0
9.6 2.6 1.5
57 57 55
1.00 0.89
9.7 2.4
0.53
1.4
0.90 0.85 0.66 0.55 0.36 0.14 0.08
0.80 0.70 0.70 0.60 0.33 0.15 0.06
47 47 52 52 47 51 44
0.92 0.88 1.30 0.64 1.40 0.88 1.50
0.75 0.72 0.60 0.61 0.22 0.18 0.02
0.78 0.80
0.06 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02
0.09 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02
58 52 54 39 51
0.76 1.20 1.10 1.50 1 .Ol
0.16 0.03 0.03 0.002 0.02
0.11 0.05
for
of carboxin
25%
sensitive
inhibition
0.50 0.14
of control d
activity.
K and
activity.
n values
from
plot.
on purified --not
In our
succinate
carboxin hands
blocks neither
or of ferricyanide
dehydrogenase.
Schewe
the succinate-PMS
TTF (“low
nor
carboxin
Km”
site
reaction (6 uM) -
(10))
et al. --
( 16)
in soluble
blocked
prepara-
either
the
in a reconstitutively
reduc-
active,
preparation. Effect ----
succinate
of carboxin
on succinate
dehydrogenase
particles
( 17).
Ki values
on succinate
dehydrogenase
aerobic
yeast and
in submitochondrial
of 0.54 to be
from
3’-Oxtoxycarboxin
non-competitively
appear
ACTIVITY
7.5 1.9 1.3
bConcentration
inhibition
of carboxins
that
soluble
(V max).
for 5oo/o
--Effect
tion
DERIVATIVES
Max.
‘PMS-DCIP
Hill
CARBOXIN
DEHYDROGENASE
TTF 4’-D imethylaminocarboxin 4’-Carboethoxycarboxin 5,6-Dihydro-2-methyl-1,6oxathiin3-carboxanilide (Carboxin) 4’-Benzoylcarboxin 4’-n-Butoxycarboxin 3’-nethylcarboxin 4’-Phenylcarboxin 4’-n-Butylcarboxin 4’-Fhenoxycarboxin 5,6-D ihydro-2-methyl1 ,boxathiin3-n-decylcarboxamide 3’-Plienoxycarboxin 4’-n -Pentylcarboxin 3’-dctoxycarboxin 4’-Hexoxycarboxin
COMMUNICATIONS
I
INHIBITORY
TTF TOWARD
RESEARCH
uM -
and
3.9
@,
is 5%
to the
yeast
dehydrogenase
is qualitatively
than
were
by
linear
reduction
the
Dixon
enzyme,
although
two
yeast
plots, Thus
in the
by
TTF in submitochondrial
calculated.
to the heart similar
PMS
inhibited
giving
respectively,
yeast.
inhibited
4’-hexoxycarboxin particles,
less inhibitory
from --
sources.
enzyme from
which
carboxins their
action
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 71, No. 1,1976
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
DISCUSSION The
results
succinate
presented
dehydrogenase
manner
similar
maximal
inhibitions
the
functioning
come
from
gz1.94
reached
The
the
kinetics
ETP)
low
concentrations
tion,
as reported
the
give
respect
Hipip
II preparations
turnover
as has also by
3’-methylcarboxin number
declines
( 14), been
purely
a modified shows to 10,000,
and
yeast
affected
chelator
TTF,
Support
inhibit
are 1,000
of
in a and
the
interfere
for
this
the
reoxidation
the
latter)
complex.
with
idea
has
of both but
cause
at 38’
are
in the
the
exten-
(Fig.
is always such
inhibition
by TTF
procedure,
PMS-DCIP
assay, inhibi-
however: 3).
At
evident.
a few
relatively
In particles
in which
Complex
II samples
carboxins
is purely
competitive
(14).
yielding
reached
It is suggestive
that
a turnover
number
componentgo
that
on cyanide
Fig. 4. Comparison of cyanide inactivation and inhibition succinate-PMS activity in ETP and Complex II. Incubation for 1 hr at 30“, pH 8 .O; 3’-methylcarboxin, where present, turnover number = 19,000 at 38O. 8. Complex II, turnover
carhigh
as typical
a non-competitive the value
membranes
non-competitive
exceptions,
concentrations
with
In intact
or predominantly There
Q 10,000,
observed
iron
(particularly
+
TTF.
the
reactions
enzyme. only
component to
the
reduction
at low
is decreased
isolated by
( 14) for
tissues
operation
II preparations.
of 20,000
inhibition
membranes
not
enzyme
give
normal
TTF.
of the
of PMS
the
animal The
like
in Complex
carboxins et al. --
as with
carboxins
a competitive
number
to PMS,
center
number
by Rossi
same
of the
inhibition
of most
(2,3,18).
carboxins,
that
inhibit
from
fungi
component
centers
a turnover
inner
inhibition
Fe-S
Fe-S
concentrations
turnover
that
(13)
of the
with
the
(18)
uncompetitive
Q-depleted
the
Hipip of the
(e.g.,
carboxin
suggested
preparations
in other were
the observations
destruction
boxins
action
of a specific
and
derivatives
in membrane
to their
It has been
sive
showthatcarboxin
(8)
or with
in Complex of
Q 13,000,
at Vmax
treatment
by 3’-methylcarboxin with cyanide (0.02 was 0.84 uM. A. number = l-00.
(PMS)
(Fig.
4).
of M) was FI’P,
Vol.
71, No.
The
fact
by cyanide depleted lat (a)
BIOCHEMICAL
1,1976
all
that
inhibition
lower
the
or cyanide
‘ma* These
(PMS))
is not
readily
II (TN (b)
either
the
It has been
shown
number
succinate-PMS would have causes with respect leads
(19)
by
known, to complete
that
by
pool
of the
modification
these
inhibitors
interruption
the
idea
Fe-S
by
to it.
PMS
suggest
with
component
enzyme
action
of carboxins
might
likewise flux
which seems
bring via
about Q
and
Nelson
in Complex limiting.
the membrane
et al. A-
its interaction
of TTF
a conformational
in every
change
reactivity
(20)
dehydrogenase,
alters that
of the
to which
of succinate
profoundly
lowered
even
to be rate
access
all
hypothesis
a potentiation
(c)
to mimic
sites
Q , since
into
Q ( 14)),
cyanide.
carboxins.
reaction
that fast
Q-
or carboxin
two-site
enzyme
as by TTF and
in the
two
The
is too
may
that
of TTF and
showing
(possibly
an Fe-S
by TTF
of the
soluble
This
and
is endogenous
however,
of the
component
of electron
access
centers
as 50%.
one
inactivation
$ 10,000
of action
( 15),
( 13),
and
further
mode that
or block
on incorporation
as well
inhibited
the
COMMUNICATIONS
of Q,
in ETP to
activity
EPR data
on interacting
Since
the
measured
a membrane
- b.
for
with
by as much
carboxin,
TTF,
a conformational cytochrome
recent
increases
that
the Q
reoxidation
activity
be blocked proposed
with
of the
not
RESEARCH
depletion
enzyme
are
explanations
compatible
deplete
reconciled
of the
preparations
for ‘L 50%
BIOPHYSICAL
or by TTF,
number
several are
= 10,000)
its turnover
turnover
suggests
of PMS , responsible treatments
carboxins
inactivated
observations
these
by
AND
which
towards
PMS.
Service
(HL
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
16251)
I. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
This investigation and the National
was supported by grants from the U.S. Science Foundation (PCM 76-03367).
Public
Health
REFERENCES Mathre, D.E. (1970) Phytophatholgy, 60, 671-676. White, G.A. (1971) Biochem. Biophys.es. Communs. 44, 1212-1219. Ulrich, J.T., and Mathre, D .E. (1972)J. Bacterrol. 1% 809-817. Tucker, A.N., and Lillich, T.T. (1974) Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 6,572-578. Georgopoulos, S .G., Alexandri, E., and Chrysayi, M. (1972) J. Bacterial. - 110, 809-817. Ringler, R.L., Minakami, S., and Singer, T.P. (1963) J. Biol. Chem. -238,801810. Baginsky, M.L., and Hatefi, Y. (1969) J. Biol. Chem. 244, 5313-5319. King, T.E. (1967) Methods in Enzymology 10, 322-331.Singer, T.P. (1974) in Methods of Biochemical Analysis (Glick, D., ed.)g, 123175, J. Wiley, NewYork. Vinogradov, A.D., Gavrikova, E.V., and Goloveshkina, V.G. (1975) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Communs. 65, 1264-1269.
360
Vol. 71, No.
11. 12. 13.
14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19.
20.
1,1976
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
White, G .A. and Thorn, G .D . (1975) Pesticide Biochem. Physiol . 5, 380-395. Ziegler, D .M. (1961) in Biological Structure and Function (Goodwin, T.W., and Lindberg, 0. eds.) II, pp. 253-264, Academic Press, New York. Singer, T, P., Beinert, H . , Ackrell , B .A .C., and Kearney, E .B. ( 1975) in Proceedings of the 10th FEBS meeting (Raoul, Y., ed.), pp. 173-185, Elsevier, Amsterdam. Rossi, E., Norling, B., Persson, B., and Ernster, L. (1970) Eur. J. Biochem. 2, 508-513. Giuditta, A., and Singer, T.P. (1959) J. Biol. Chem. 234, 666-671. Schewe, T., Rapoport, S., Bbhme, G., and Kunz, W .p73) Acta. biol. med. Germ. 31, 73-86. Grossman, S., Goldenberg, J., Oestreicher, G., Kearney, E.B., and Singer, T.P. (1974) unpublished data. Georgopoulos, S .G., Chrysayi, M., and White, G .A. ( 1975) Pesticide Biochem. Physiol . 5, 543-551. Ackrell ,I .A.C . , Kearney , E .B., Mowery, P., Singer, T .P., Beinert, H., Vinogradov, A.D., and White, G .A. (1976) in Iron and Copper Proteins (Yasunobu, K., ed.), Plenum Press, New York, in press. L. (1971) Biochem. Biophys. Nelson, B .D . , Norling , B ., Persson, 9. , and Ernster, Res. Communs. 44, 1312-1320. -
361