Journal Pre-proof Catalytic activity of heterogeneous acid catalysts derived from corncob in the esterification of oleic acid with methanol Suppasate Dechakhumwat, Plaifa Hongmanorom, Chachchaya Thunyaratchatanon, Siwaporn Meejoo Smith, Supakorn Boonyuen, Apanee Luengnaruemitchai PII:
S0960-1481(19)31671-4
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.174
Reference:
RENE 12543
To appear in:
Renewable Energy
Received Date: 25 September 2018 Revised Date:
16 August 2019
Accepted Date: 31 October 2019
Please cite this article as: Dechakhumwat S, Hongmanorom P, Thunyaratchatanon C, Smith SM, Boonyuen S, Luengnaruemitchai A, Catalytic activity of heterogeneous acid catalysts derived from corncob in the esterification of oleic acid with methanol, Renewable Energy (2019), doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.174. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
1 1
Catalytic activity of heterogeneous acid catalysts derived from
2
corncob in the esterification of oleic acid with methanol
3 4
Suppasate Dechakhumwata, Plaifa Hongmanoroma, Chachchaya Thunyaratchatanona,
5
Siwaporn Meejoo Smithc, Supakorn Boonyuend, Apanee Luengnaruemitchaia,b,*
6 7
a
8 9
10330, Thailand b
10 11
14
Center of Excellence on Catalysis for Bioenergy and Renewable Chemicals (CBRC), Chulalongkorn University, Phayathai Rd., Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
c
12 13
The Petroleum and Petrochemical College, Chulalongkorn University, Soi Chula 12, Phyathai Road, Bangkok
Center of Alternative Energy, Faculty of Science and Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, 999 Phuttamonthon Sai 4 Rd., Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
d
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Rangsit Centre, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
15 16
ABSTRACT
17
Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) pretreated corncob-derived residue was used as a starting material to prepare
18
solid acid catalysts using different sulfonation chemicals (H2SO4, p-toluenesulfonic acid (TsOH)
19
and H2SO4/TsOH mixtures) for biodiesel production from the esterification of oleic acid with
20
methanol. Effects of the different sulfonation agents on the properties of the derived carbon-based
21
materials were investigated using various characterization techniques. Lignin residues were
22
obtained after the H2SO4 pretreatment step, and high lignin-containing carbon-based catalysts of ca.
23
69% (w/w) lignin were derived after sulfonation with H2SO4. Employing TsOH or H2SO4/TsOH
24
mixtures for sulfonation gave materials with a higher carbon/hydrogen (C/H) ratio, indicating a
25
relatively effective carbonization compared to that with H2SO4 sulfonation. The catalytic activity of
26
the sulfonated corncob in the esterification of oleic acid with methanol was influenced by the acid
27
density, acid strength and porous structure of the sulfonated materials. High methyl oleate yields (>
2 28
80% after 8 h at 60 °C) were achieved using the acid catalyst obtained from either H2SO4 or TsOH
29
sulfonation, whereas those from H2SO4/TsOH sulfonation gave slightly lower yields. Thus, the use
30
of the non-volatile TsOH solid as a ‘greener’ sulfonating agent for the production of carbon-based
31
solid acid catalysts with a high catalytic activity in the esterification reaction is supported.
32 33
Keywords: FAME; carbon based acid catalyst; sulfonation; p-Toluenesulfonic acid; esterification;
34
oleic acid
35 36
∗
37
Tel.: 662-218-4148; Fax: 662-611-7220; e-mail address:
[email protected]
Address author correspondence:
38 39
1.
Introduction
40
Green economy, an initiative that aims to lead to a low-carbon industrial revolution, should
41
primarily focus on “improved human well-being and social equity, while significantly reducing
42
environmental risks and ecological scarcities”, according to the UNEP [1]. Being aligned well with
43
this sustainable initiative, bioeconomy has attracted increasing interest as it involves the use of
44
renewable natural resources as raw materials in several manufacturing industries, such as the
45
production of food, feed, bio-based products and biofuels [2]. Although biodiesel had a small
46
production level from 2001–2005 (< 100 million gallons), a significant (more than 15-fold) increase
47
in the annual biodiesel production has occurred from 2013 onwards, with a recorded 1,556 million
48
gallons being produced in 2016 [3]. Based on current projections (2010–2025) of the European
49
Union and the US EIA [4, 5], demand for biodiesel will continue to escalate each year.
50
Interestingly, the US biodiesel production in 2016 surpassed the forecasted value by 1.7-fold,
51
indicating the outstanding growth of the US biodiesel sector. This significant growth in biodiesel
52
production in the US could be attributed to the acceptable operational performance and
3 53
environmentally friendly perception of bio-based fuels, as well as an important tax incentive
54
scheme [6].
55
Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), or biodiesel, can be produced via either transesterification of
56
triglycerides or esterification of free fatty acids (FFAs) with a short-chain alcohol in the presence of
57
a catalyst. Esterification of FFAs and alcohol generally requires an acid catalyst to achieve a high
58
FAME yield. On the other hand, basic catalysts are not ideal as they often react with FFAs to form
59
soap and so give a low FAME yield and purity. Previous works have reported the utilization of
60
homogeneous acid catalysts in the production of FAMEs from poor quality feedstocks, particularly
61
for triglycerides with low FFA contents [7-9]. However, using a homogeneous catalyst requires large
62
volume reactors, a large amount of catalyst. In addition, catalyst recyclability is a formidable
63
problem since homogeneous catalysts are miscible with the reaction mixture, causing a large
64
amount of waste water from the production of FAMEs. Thus, the use of heterogeneous catalysts has
65
gained considerable attention, owing to the reduced occurrence of corrosion, an improved
66
environmentally friendly processes and the possibility to reuse or recycle the solid catalyst.
67
Generally, homogeneous Bronsted acids, such as sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and hydrogen fluoride,
68
have been applied onto a solid support to increase the acid sites, stability and reusability of
69
heterogeneous catalysts in many acid-catalyzed reactions. However, most heterogeneous catalysts
70
developed so far are expensive and require complex synthetic procedures. Recently, sulfonated
71
carbon-based materials derived from H2SO4 treatment have shown great promise as effective
72
catalysts in the esterification of FFAs [10,11]. Nevertheless, to produce sulfonated materials from
73
sulfonating agents like H2SO4 requires special safety guidelines, as well as a high pressure-
74
withstanding reactor that resists damaging corrosion. Alternative sulfonating agents with a low
75
vapor pressure would be preferable to establish a ‘greener’ sulfonation process, which is more
76
environmentally benign in numerous industrial processes. In this vein, the sulfonation of sugar and
77
extracted lignin was performed using the non-volatile p-toluenesulfonic acid (TsOH), which
78
resulted in a material with a high acid site content and strong acidity [12-14]. Furthermore, a
4 79
carbon-silica composite bearing -SO3H functional groups was obtained through TsOH treatment
80
followed by H2SO4 sulfonation [15], where the TsOH treatment reduced the amount of corrosive
81
H2SO4 reagent required in the sulfonation process.
82
Corn (or maize) is one of the most common biomass used to produce ethanol in the US (ranked
83
1st in the world for ethanol production), as well as in China and Canada. Note that, in 2016, the US
84
retained its position as the top ethanol producer at around 60% of the world’s ethanol production
85
[16]. In the ethanol production industry, machines are used to separate corn kernels from corncobs
86
during harvesting, and the kernels are then stored for further liquefaction, saccharification,
87
fermentation, distillation and dehydration [17]. The post-harvested corn leaves, stems, husks and
88
cobs are typically left in the fields, for boosting up the soil’s nutrients, or in some countries like
89
Thailand, are often burnt. Corn plantation is a major source of grains supplied in the animal feed
90
sector in Thailand [18]. Thus, an appropriate management of the large amount of agricultural waste
91
is necessary to prevent air pollution caused by the burning of the waste prior to planting a new crop.
92
In this work, corncob residue was used as a starting material for the preparation of solid acid
93
catalysts. The simple treatment of corncobs with H2SO4 can produce a series of porous solid
94
Brønsted acids. Several attempts have been made towards the synthesis of solid acid catalysts using
95
organosulfonic acid-functionalized catalysts on corncob residues. The sulfonating agent TsOH is an
96
aromatic ring linked to a long alkyl chain that endows the acid catalyst with an amphiphilic nature.
97
The main objective of this present work was to compare the catalytic performance in the oleic acid-
98
methanol esterification reaction of the corncob materials functionalized with sulfonic acid by
99
H2SO4, TsOH or H2SO4/TsOH mixtures. The optimum conditions of the catalyst preparation, in
100
terms of the type and amount of reagent and ratio of acid, were determined and benchmarked with
101
those in the previous reported works. As a comparison, commercial lignin was also treated in a
102
similar way with H2SO4 or TsOH. The catalytic activity of the carbon based materials in the
103
esterification of oleic acid with methanol was evaluated in terms of the methyl oleate (FAME)
104
yield. Note that oleic acid was selected as an unsaturated FFA model as it is the major FFA in
5 105
commonly available vegetable oils, such as 37% by weight (wt.%) in palm oil, the world’s most
106
widely used oil. The characteristics of the obtained sulfonated materials, in terms of their
107
morphology, functional group, surface area, pore size, internal structure, bulk composition, types of
108
acid site, acid site concentration and sulfur content, were examined. The reusability of the
109
sulfonated corncob-derived materials was also investigated.
110
The physical and chemical properties of the sulfonated corncob-derived materials were
111
characterized using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron
112
microscopy (SEM), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface area, elemental analysis,
113
Fourier transform-infrared spectrophotometry (FT-IR) and ammonia-temperature-programmed
114
desorption (NH3-TPD).
115 116
2. Materials and methods
117
Corncobs were supplied as complimentary samples by the Betagro Company, Thailand. The
118
average particle size (homogenized in a single lot) of the corncob was 1.6 mm. They were dried at
119
105 °C in an oven overnight and stored at room temperature for further use. Previously, when
120
corncobs were used as a raw material to produce biobutanol, they were first pretreated by dilute
121
acid treatment followed by enzymatic hydrolysis and acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation [19].
122
The pretreated corncobs were then filtered from the supernatant and were further treated by
123
enzymatic hydrolysis, which had a synergetic effect on the overall yields of reducing sugars. Solid
124
acid catalysts in the present work were, accordingly, prepared by the same H2SO4 acid pretreatment of
125
the corncobs but then used for the subsequent sulfonation. All supplied chemicals were AR grade
126
except as described otherwise.
127 128
2.1. Solid acid catalyst preparation
129
Following the reported optimum conditions [19], 10 g of dried ground corncob was suspended
130
in 100 mL of 2 wt.% H2SO4 in an 80-mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave with stirring for 15
6 131
min. The suspension was heated in a temperature-controlled oven at 120 ºC for 5 min, cooled and
132
then washed with de-ionized water (DW) to eliminate excess ions. The solid sample was separated,
133
dried in an oven at 110 ºC for 12 h, and kept in a desiccator and refereed to hereafter as pretreated
134
corncob (or C).
135
The pre-treated corncob was acidified by sulfonation using H2SO4 (98 wt.%, Sigma-Aldrich) or
136
TsOH (98 wt.%, Sigma-Aldrich) at varying concentrations, or H2SO4/TsOH mixtures at varying
137
weight ratios as follows. The H2SO4 sulfonation was performed in a closed-system reactor at 110 °C
138
for 5 h, using 5 g of pretreated corncob and 50 mL of H2SO4, with the obtained product denoted as
139
C-H2SO4. The TsOH sulfonation was performed by mixing 5 g of pretreated corncob and TsOH
140
powder (5, 10, 15 or 20 g) in an acid digestion bomb reactor at 180 °C. The obtained sulfonated
141
samples were denoted as C-TsOH-x, where x represents the weight of TsOH. Finally, the
142
H2SO4/TsOH sulfonation of 5 g of pretreated corncob was performed by 15 min mixing on a
143
magnetic stirrer, followed by heating in an acid digestion bomb reactor at 180 °C for 24 h. The
144
sulfonated samples derived from the H2SO4/TsOH treatments at H2SO4: TsOH (w/w) ratios of 1:3
145
and 3:2 were denoted as C-M-3-10 and C-M-15-10, respectively.
146
In addition, the sulfonation of commercial lignin (kraft and low sulfonate alkali, Sigma Aldrich)
147
was performed in a similar procedure to that used to prepare C-H2SO4 and C-TsOH-10, with the
148
sulfonated lignin samples denoted as L-H2SO4 and L-TsOH-10, respectively. At the end of the
149
respective sulfonation process, each sample was washed by warm DW until the filtrate had a neutral
150
pH, and the conductivity of supernatant was about 0–10 mS. Then, the separated solid sample was
151
dried in an oven at 110 °C for 12 h, and subsequently stored in a silica gel desiccator until use.
152 153
2.2. FAME production
154
Esterification of oleic acid with methanol catalyzed by the sulfonated materials was performed
155
using a 1-L Parr reactor under 0.3 MPa of nitrogen (N2) gas with stirring at 300 rpm. For each
156
reaction, a certain amount of oleic acid was added in a suspension of solid catalyst (of specific
7 157
weight) in methanol. The effects of the three operating parameters of the reaction time (up to 8 h),
158
reaction temperature (60, 80 and 100 ºC) and catalyst loading level, on the FAME yield were
159
investigated by univariate analysis. Unless stated otherwise stated, the reaction was performed at 60
160
ºC with a methanol: oil molar ratio of 15:1 and a catalyst loading of 5 wt.% compared to vegetable
161
oil.
162
After the reaction, the samples drawn from the reaction mixture were centrifuged and excess
163
methanol was removed at 90 °C in a water bath. The solid catalyst was filtered from the reaction
164
solution. The methyl oleate (FAME product) content was kept in a vial prior to analysis by gas
165
chromatography using a Hewlett Packard GC model 5890 equipped with a flame ionization
166
detector, as previously reported [20]. The methyl oleate yields were determined using Eq. (1); C=
167
(∑ A) − A
EI
AEI
×
C EI × VEI × 100 m
(1),
∑ A is the overall area of methyl ester from C
168
where C is the methyl ester content,
169
the peak area of that which is aligned with the methyl heptadecanoate solution, C EI and VEI are the
170
concentration (mg/mL) and volume, respectively, of the methyl heptadecanoate solution (mL) and
171
m is the weight (mg) of the sample.
14
to C 24 , AEI is
172
All experiments were repeated at least twice. To demonstrate the reusability of the prepared
173
catalyst, it was separated by filtration after completion of the esterification reaction and reused in a
174
2nd and 3rd successive run under the same conditions without regeneration.
175 176
2.3. Catalyst characterization
177
All samples were characterized as follows. The crystallinity of the acid catalysts was
178
characterized by XRD analysis using a Rigaku Smartlab powder X-ray diffractometer. Each
179
powdered sample was placed on a glass sample holder to record the XRD profile range from 10–
180
90° at a scanning speed of 2°/min, step of 0.01° and acceleration voltage of 40 kV.
8 181 182
The morphological structure of the synthesized catalysts was characterized by SEM using a Hitachi TM 3000 scanning electron microscope operated at an acceleration voltage of 30 kV.
183
The BET specific surface area, pore volume and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) pore diameter
184
were evaluated from the results of N2-desorption analysis using a Thermo Finnigan Sorptomatic
185
1990 Series analyzer. Before analysis, the volatile species adsorbed on the catalyst surface were
186
eliminated by heating 1 g of the catalyst under a vacuum atmosphere at 300 °C for 18 h. Helium gas
187
was used as an adsorbate for the blank analysis, and N2 gas was used as the adsorbate.
188
The atomic carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and sulfur composition of each sample was evaluated by
189
CHNS and X-ray fluorescence (XRF; Panalytical Axios PW 4400) analyses, while FT-IR analysis,
190
using a Nicolet Nexus 670 spectrometer, was employed to identify the chemical functional groups
191
in the samples using the KBr pellet method and recording the FT-IR spectra over the range of
192
4,000–600 cm−1.
193
The weight change of a material as a function of temperature and time in a controlled
194
atmosphere was measured by TGA using a Perkin: Pyris Diamond instrument. It is ideally used to
195
assess the volatile content, thermal stability, degradation characteristics, aging/lifetime breakdown,
196
sintering behavior and reaction kinetics of sample. The respective sample (10 mg) was heated from
197
50 °C up to 700 °C at a 20 °C/min. The TGA was performed at atmospheric pressure in a N2 flow
198
of 20 mL/min.
199
The acidity of the solid acid catalysts was evaluated by NH3-TPD / reduction / oxidation analysis
200
(NH3-TPD/R/O) using a Thermo Finnigan TPDRO 1100 instrument. The acidity was calculated
201
from the derived temperature profile by integration of the peak area compared with standard
202
samples.
203
In addition, an acid-base titration method was utilized to quantify the total acid density of each
204
spent catalysts. In brief, 0.05 g sample was suspended in 15 mL of 2 M NaCl solution and kept in
205
an ultrasonic bath for 30 min. The ultrasonic treatment should allow an exchange between H+ ions
206
existing in sulfonated (–SO3H) catalyst and Na+ ions. Next, the ultrasonically treated sample was
9 207
titrated with 0.02 M NaOH, using phenolphthalein as an indicator. The total acidity of each
208
sulfonated sample was quantified from the concentration of the NaOH solution multiplied by the
209
volume of the NaOH solution consumed and divided by the weight of catalyst used [11].
210 211
3. Results and Discussion
212
3.1.Catalyst Characterization
213
TGA analysis. Three decomposition curves were observed in the TGA plots (Fig. 1) and
214
utilized to determine the amount of cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin and residue components in
215
each sample. The compositions of dried biomass based samples were estimated (wt.%) by
216
optimization of the reported decomposition model [21]. Fresh corncob had cellulose,
217
hemicelluloses, lignin and residue compositions of 32.15, 27.31, 39.41 and 1.21 wt.%, respectively.
218
An initial weight loss was observed up to 100 °C due to water evaporation. Hemicellulose
219
depolymerization occurs at 200–300 °C and cellulose degradation occurs at 300–400 °C [22]. The
220
weight loss observed for fresh corncob was observed at 320 °C whereas at this temperature no
221
weight loss was observed for C-TsOH-10, probably due to its low content of cellulose. Lignin
222
degradation occurs at 200–500 °C, which covers a wide range of the cellulose and hemicellulose
223
degradation temperature [23-26]. Sulfonation of the corncob led to an increased residual lignin
224
(except for C-TsOH-10) and residue materials. The samples with a high lignin content (> 60 wt.%),
225
C-H2SO4 and L-H2SO4, were comparable to that in the commercial lignin. The sulfonation
226
treatments generally led to complete decomposition of hemicellulose as well as cellulose removal.
227
Only the C-H2SO4 material had some residual cellulose, at around 37% of the initial cellulose
228
content in the fresh corncob. Therefore, it can be concluded that the sulfonation using TsOH
229
effectively removed both cellulose and hemicellulose in the biomass material.
230
XRD analysis. Figure 2 shows representative XRD profiles of the powdered fresh and
231
sulfonated corncob samples. The three diffraction peaks at a 2θ of around 16.0°, 22.6° and
232
35.0°attributed to the crystalline regions of cellulose type I were observed in the fresh sample [27].
10 233
Sharper XRD peaks corresponding to cellulose were observed from the pretreated corncob, possibly
234
due to the surface damage of the biomass that allowed effective X-ray exposure [28]. This indicates
235
that acid pretreatment disrupted the native cellulose crystalline structure and increased the porosity,
236
surface area and crystallinity level compared to the untreated samples [29]. Poorly crystalline
237
materials were obtained after sulfonation by either H2SO4 or TsOH. After sulfonation, the
238
amorphous carbon structure (at 2θ = 15−35°) was observed, assigned to the (002) plane of the
239
carbon [30], and the weak diffraction band located at 2θ = 40−50° becomes more visible. Note that
240
the characteristics of the amorphous carbon in the sulfonated corncob are in good agreement with
241
previous work that reported on sulfonated carbon base materials derived from glucose [12]. In
242
addition, the XRD results agree well with those obtained from the TGA analyses.
243
Morphology and surface properties. The morphology of fresh corncob, pretreated corncob and
244
the C-H2SO4 catalyst are shown in Fig. 3. The fresh corncob had a less porous structure and
245
smoother surface compared with the others. Generated pores can be observed in the pretreated
246
corncob, and were more evident after the sulfonation with H2SO4. Small pores appeared on the
247
surface of the pretreated corncob, while larger pores were visible on the H2SO4 sulfonated sample.
248
Nevertheless, TsOH sulfonation of the corncob using varies amount of TsOH (5, 10, 15 or 20 g)
249
resulted in highly porous materials, as shown in Fig. 3(d-g). Similar results were obtained from the
250
sulfonation when using H2SO4/TsOH mixtures, as seen in Fig. 3(h-i). The surface characteristics of
251
the obtained C-H2SO4 material corresponded well to the porous sulfonated coffee residue reported
252
previously [28]. Notably, sulfonation with H2SO4/TsOH mixtures changed the structure of the
253
catalysts less than with pure TsOH. The SEM images of commercial lignin after sulfonation with
254
H2SO4/TsOH mixtures also showed a porous structure (Fig. 3(j-l)).
255
The BET specific surface area, specific pore volume and pore diameter of the fresh corncob and
256
sulfonated carbonaceous materials derived from corncob are summarized in Table 1. The specific
257
surface areas of the sulfonated samples were much higher than that of the fresh corncob, in
258
excellent agreement with the porous structure observed in the SEM results. The H2SO4 sulfonation
11 259
was less effective at production of a porous material compared with the TsOH processes, and
260
increasing the TsOH content increased the surface area and pore volume of the obtained C-TsOH-X
261
materials in a dose-dependent manner. Utilizing the H2SO4/TsOH mixtures for sulfonation further
262
developed pores in the sulfonated materials, as suggested by the significantly higher values of the
263
surface area (> 360 m2/g) and pore volume (ca. 0.29 cm3/g) observed in the sulfonated materials
264
prepared with the H2SO4/TsOH mixtures. Overall, the pore diameters of the obtained sulfonated
265
materials were ranked with respect to the acid system used as H2SO4 >>TsOH > H2SO4/TsOH.
266
Notably, a low surface area and small pore volume were observed in the sulfonated carbonaceous
267
material derived from lignin, indicating the advantages of using corncob biomass as the starting
268
material for sulfonation.
269
Composition. The composition of light chemical elements (C, H, N and including S) in the
270
samples is summarized in Table 1. The elemental composition of fresh corncob and commercial
271
lignin were around 50% C and 5–6% H (C/H ratio of 8–9), but corncob had more N and less S than
272
lignin. The increased C/H values (15.6–17.6) found in the sulfonated samples, with C levels
273
increased to 56-72% and H levels decreased to 3.44–4.59%, are evidence that the carbonization
274
process occurred during sulfonation. The higher (14.3- to 23-fold) sulfur content found in the
275
sulfonated samples may represent the increased number of –SO3H active sites on the sulfonated
276
samples [12,31]. The S contents in the sulfonated samples were in the range of 3.22–5.98 wt.%,
277
where a 23-fold higher sulfur content was found in C-TsOH-10 (5.98 wt.%) than that in the fresh
278
corncob (0.26 wt.%). Note that commercial lignin contained quite a high sulfur content (4.81 wt.%)
279
and subsequent H2SO4 or TsOH sulfonation slightly enhanced its sulfur content to 6.44 and 7.90
280
wt.%, respectively.
281
Furthermore, the XRF analysis data (not shown) also confirmed the higher sulfur content in the
282
sulfonated samples than that in the fresh corncob (5.85 wt.% of sulfur oxides), supporting the
283
reported CHNS analysis results. Other chemical elements in the fresh corncob included Al, Si, P,
284
Cl, K and Ca at 6.97, 18.16, 1.69, 5.85, 19.01 and 44.09 wt.%, respectively. The very high sulfur
12 285
content detected in the C-H2SO4 and C-TsOH-10 samples (78.56 and 95.81 wt.%, respectively)
286
suggested the effective sulfonation processes used in this work.
287
From the FT-IR analysis (Fig. 4), the absorption peaks at 1420 cm-1 (CH2 bending vibration
288
mode, representing crystallinity band [32]) and at 1040 cm-1 (C-O stretching vibration mode) were
289
detected in the fresh and pretreated corncob samples. However, a greatly reduced intensity of these
290
peaks was observed in the sulfonated materials, C-H2SO4 and C-TsOH-10, implying the
291
modification and/or degradation of lignin units. After sulfonation, the appearance of absorption
292
bands at 1030 and 1155 cm-1 were attributed to the O=S=O symmetric stretching and SO3 stretching
293
[32], indicating that -SO3H groups were successfully incorporated into the framework in the form of
294
C-SO3H. The stronger absorption peaks around 1030 and 1155 cm-1 in C-TsOH-10 compared to C-
295
H2SO4 suggested a higher amount of sulfonic acid functional groups was obtained in C-TsOH-10
296
than in C-H2SO4.
297
Acidity properties. The acidity property of a solid catalyst is comprised of the number, strength
298
and type (Brønsted or Lewis) of acid sites. However, no single method can provide these properties.
299
The total acidity of the catalysts was obtained using acid-base titration [33], while the number and
300
strength of acid sites of the carbonaceous samples was examined based on the peak position and
301
peak area obtained from the NH3-TPD profiles. The disadvantages of this method are that NH3 can
302
be adsorbed on the non-acidic part of a surface, and the peak temperature does not show the acid
303
strength directly [34].
304
The total acidity obtained from titration ranged from 0.32–1.93 mmol/g, where C-H2SO4 gave
305
the highest acidity (1.93 ± 0.01 mmol/g) and L-TsOH-10 gave the lowest acidity (0.315 ± 0.01
306
mmol/g). Whereas the amount of acid sites for C-H2SO4 was estimated from desorption peak area of
307
NH3 released through TPD at 1.17 mmol/g. As illustrated in Fig. 5, the desorption peaks occurring
308
between 100–300 °C (-OH, -COOH), 300–550 °C (-SO3H) and higher than 550 °C were assigned to
309
the weak, medium and strong acid sites on the surface, respectively [35]. The peak at the higher
310
desorption temperature (620–700 °C) was clearly observed for C-H2SO4 and L-H2SO4 (Fig. 5 (a)
13 311
and (h)) corresponding to the stronger acid sites, which agrees well with the two largest acid
312
quantity obtained from titration method (Table 1). For the C-TsOH samples (Fig. 5 (b)-(e)), the total
313
acidity determined by NH3-TPD revealed that increasing the TsOH amount decreased the amount of
314
strong acid sites and the Tmax of the strong acid sites slightly shifted toward a higher temperature.
315
The material derived from corncob sulfonation with the H2SO4/TsOH, especially C-M-15-10,
316
showed the highest amount of acid sites. This result is consistent with previous work, which
317
reported that carbon based materials with a higher acid density were obtained when using an acid
318
mixture (ClSO3H/H2SO4) as the sulfonating agent rather than when using H2SO4 alone [36].
319
Surprisingly, the TPD profile of L-TsOH-10 showed the smallest amount of acid sites and the Tmax
320
of the strong acid sites was shifted slightly to the lowest temperature compared to the other
321
catalysts.
322 323
3.2. Effect of the sulfonation agent
324
The solid carbonaceous materials of this study were then employed as acid catalysts in the
325
esterification of oleic acid with methanol to produce methyl oleate (FAME), with the corresponding
326
yields reported in Table 1. The total acidity of the catalysts obtained from the titration ranged from
327
0.32–1.93 mmol/g, depending on the synthesis conditions, and gave a FAME yield in the range of
328
39.5 ± 2.0% to 86.5 ± 0.6%. The FAME yield was related to the total acid site obtained from
329
titration, where C-H2SO4 gave the highest FAME yield (86.5%) and L-TsOH gave the lowest
330
FAME yield (39.5%), suggesting that more acid sites and stronger acid strength (from NH3-TPD)
331
could activate the protonation of the carbonyl oxygen. However, the obtained FAME yields
332
suggested that the catalytic activity of the sulfonated carbon-based materials depended on not only
333
their acid property but also on their porous structure. It should be noted that the acidity present in
334
the catalysts in this work is low compared to the total acid density of the commercial Amberlyst-15
335
(4.2 mmol/g) [11], where a FAME yield of 85% was obtained with 7 wt.% Amberlyst-15 at a
336
7:1 molar ratio of methanol: oleic acid and 60 °C. Whereas H2SO4-Zr2O (total acidity by NH3-TPD
14 337
of 1.66 mmol/g) gave a 98% yield at 100 °C at a 10 h reaction time and HCl-SO3-ZrO2
338
(6.29 mmol/g) under the same condition gave a nearly 100% yield [35].
339
Catalysts prepared from TsOH sulfonation resulted in high FAME yields (≥ 73%) with C-
340
TsOH-10 achieving the highest FAME yield (80.4%) of the C-TsOH-X catalysts, but these FAME
341
yields were still lower than that with C-H2SO4. Note that the higher catalytic activity of the acid
342
catalysts derived from TsOH sulfonation were obtained from the catalyst having a higher amount of
343
strong acid sites, but, as already stated, C-H2SO4 gave a higher FAME yield despite having a lower
344
level of strong acid sites. Using the H2SO4/TsOH acid mixture as the sulfonating agent led to an
345
acidic carbonaceous catalyst with a markdly larger amount of strong acid sites, in agreement with
346
previous work [36], but with FAME yields of only around 75%. Thus, additional explanation is
347
required for the highest FAME yield being obtained with the C-H2SO4 catalyst. Catalysts with a
348
better performance have previously been reported to have larger pore diameters that allow the
349
reactants (methanol, fatty acid) to efficiently diffuse into the catalytically active sites [37]. On this
350
basis, it was reasonable that the catalysts with the smaller pore diameters gave lower FAME yields
351
despite having a high number of strong acid sites. This could be the reason why the highest FAME
352
yield was obtained with C-H2SO4, as it had the largest pore diameter. The surface acidity obtained
353
in this work showed the same trend as that in other studies. The sulfonated solid acid catalyst
354
obtained from algae increased from 0.6 mmol/g to 1.46 mmol/g [38] and the density of –SO3H sites
355
in the rice husk char catalyst of 0.70 mmol/g [39] gave the best catalytic performance for
356
esterification at 90 °C, although this reaction temperature was higher than that used in the present
357
work.
358
The presence of S in the C-H2SO4 and C-TsOH-10 samples was also confirmed by X-ray
359
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis, as shown in Fig. 6. The main C 1s bands at 285 eV
360
(Fig. 6 (a) and (b)) were attributed to C–C bonding and the bands at 286.3, 287.7 and 289.1 eV are
361
attributed to C–O bonds, carbonyl and carboxylic acid groups, respectively, [40]. The relative
362
amount of C–O bonding in the C-H2SO4 sample was higher than that in C-TsOH-10. The band at
15 363
169 eV attributed to the S in –SO3H groups was clearly seen in both catalysts (Fig. 6 (c) and (d)).
364
On the other hand, the band at 164 eV attributed to S in the SH groups [41] was only observed in
365
the C-TsOH-10 sample.
366
More specifically, in the case of C-TsOH-X catalysts, it could be noticed that the catalytic
367
performance might directly correlated with acidity properties. For C-TsOH-10, it gave the quite
368
high FAME yield, albeit the acid quantity was merely 0.58 mmol/g, which was lower than that of
369
the other C-TsOH-X catalysts (Table 1). Nevertheless, it provided the highest level of S contents
370
which could refer to both SO3H and SH groups, and as a result, having more acidic sites to proceed
371
the esterification reaction. As presented in Figure 5, the NH3-TPD profile of C-TsOH-10 catalyst
372
also reveals the more distinct desorption peak centered around 150 °C than other catalysts,
373
attributed to the more existence of –OH and/or –COOH. These weak acid groups could enhance the
374
catalytic performance by acting as active sites, facilitating the adsorption of reactants on the catalyst
375
surface, and consequently, increasing the reaction possibility [42].
376 377
3.3. Effect of the reaction time and temperature
378
To determine the optimum condition for FAME production, the C-H2SO4 and C-TsOH-10
379
catalysts were chosen as they exhibited the highest catalytic activity. The esterification of methanol
380
and oleic acid was performed for 2, 4 and 8 h at 60 °C to evaluate the effect of the reaction time
381
(Fig. 7). Interestingly, after 2 h of reaction, C-TsOH-10 gave a higher (about 2.75-fold) FAME
382
yield than C-H2SO4, which was probably due to the higher amount of strong acid sites (Fig. 5 (b)).
383
At a longer reaction time of 4 h, a greater FAME yield was obtained with both catalysts than at 2 h,
384
but they both now gave a broadly similar FAME yield, while after 8 h C-H2SO4 gave a higher
385
FAME yield than C-TsOH-10. The large diameter pores in the C-H2SO4 catalyst, which will both
386
allow larger substrates to diffuse in and also become blocked with smaller by-product molecules
387
less easily, may facilitate the relatively high FAME yields at longer reaction times.
16 388
Considering the faster initial reaction kinetics of C-TsOH-10 than C-H2SO4, then C-TsOH-10
389
was selected to study the effect of the reaction temperature. The temperature-dependent FAME
390
yields as a function of reaction time in the esterification of oleic acid with methanol catalyzed by C-
391
TsOH-10 is shown in Fig. 8. At 60 °C, a 4 h esterification gave a FAME yield of ∼72%, being
392
comparable to the highest FAME yield obtained using sulfonated coffee residue as catalyst in the
393
esterification of caprylic acid, a shorter chain fatty acid, at a similar temperature and reaction time
394
[43]. In addition, the C-TsOH-10 catalyst gave higher FAME yields and required a lower reaction
395
temperature, compared with that reported previously for various acid catalysts, such as Amberlyst
396
15, Nafion NR50 and sulfonated polydivinylbenzene [44].
397
For comparison, the sulfonated carbon synthesized by the hydrothermal carbonization of a
398
mixture of furfural/sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS)/H2SO4 at 180 °C, with a surface area
399
of 40 m2/g and total acid level of 2.3 mmol/g, gave a 87.3% FAME yield for the esterification of
400
oleic acid and methanol at 65 °C within 4 h [45], whereas the chitosan sulfonate bead with 0.34
401
mmol/g gave 70% methyl oleate at 50°C within 4 h [46]. As expected, higher temperatures
402
enhanced the oleic acid conversion rate [47]. Here, the C-TsOH-10 catalyst was relatively active at
403
80 °C and 100 °C giving FAME yields of ca. 70% and 83% after 1 and 4 h, respectively.
404
Temperature was the important variable with the greatest effect on FAMEs yield, which was
405
increased by about 1.6-fold when increasing the reaction temperature from 60 °C to 80 °C after 1 h.
406
Since it is economically desirable to conduct high-yield reactions at the lowest temperature, the
407
catalyst reusability was further examined at 80 °C.
408 409
3.4. Reusability of the C-TsOH-10 catalyst
410
The reusability of the C-TsOH-10 catalyst was investigated in the esterification of oleic acid and
411
methanol. The reaction was performed under the same reaction conditions for four cycles. After
412
each cycle, the catalyst was separated from the mixture of reactant and products and retested in a
413
fresh reaction without regeneration.
17 414
Unlike synthetic catalysts, sulfonated mesoporous polymer [36] showed a great promise as an
415
effective and reusable catalyst in esterification of oleic acid (> 90%) for up to four cycles, though
416
with the requirement of a high temperature (100 °C) and high methanol: oil molar ratio (30:1).
417
However, this polymeric catalyst required several chemical reagents and well-controlled synthesis
418
steps to ensure sufficient yields of the catalyst end product. In contrast, the potential benefits of
419
corncob as the starting material for the production of solid acid catalysts is the natural and
420
renewable abundance of this non-toxic waste biomass.
421
The FAME yields obtained with C-TsOH-10 dropped substantially from 77.51% to 44.91 % and
422
28.76% in the 2nd and 3rd cycle, respectively. This was probably due to some leaching of acid sites
423
from the catalyst surface, with a reduction in the acid quantity obtained from titration of ca. 24% in
424
the 3rd cycle (from 0.58 to 0.50 and 0.44 mmol/g in the 2nd and 3rd cycle, respectively). Catalyst
425
deactivation may also be caused by poisoned active sites covered by the water by-product [43,48].
426
The deactivation of catalysts after the first cycle was also observed in the case of other sulfonated
427
biomass catalysts [48,49], where a washing step could be added to regenerate the catalyst.
428 429
4. Conclusions
430
This work systematically investigated the relationship between the properties and the catalytic
431
activity of carbonaceous acid catalysts derived from the sulfonation of corncob using various
432
sulfonating agent systems. Both solid TsOH and liquid H2SO4/TsOH mixtures can be used as
433
effective sulfonating agents in the preparation of biomass-based solid acid catalysts with a high
434
amount of strong acid sites. However, in terms of catalytic activity in the esterification of oleic acid
435
with methanol, only the H2SO4 and TsOH sulfonated materials gave methyl oleate (FAME) yields
436
of 80% or above. A faster initial reaction rate was observed in the esterification catalyzed by C-
437
TsOH-10 than C-H2SO4. The catalytic activity of the studied sulfonated corncob materials
438
depended not only on the quantity of strong acid sites, but also on their specific surface area and
439
pore sizes. The C-TsOH-10 catalyst had a high surface area of 240 m2/g, and suitable pore size of
18 440
3.5 nm in diameter, and that allowed long chain oleic acid to easily diffuse into the catalyst pore and
441
react with methanol at the catalytically active sites. Utilizing TsOH as a sulfonating agent could
442
dismiss the requirement for a large-volume reactor and lower the risk of the sulfonation process
443
compared to the use of H2SO4.
444 445
Acknowledgements
446
The authors thank: the Government Research Budget (Grant No. GRB_APS_49_59_63_08);
447
Chulalongkorn University (CU-GES-60-04-63-03); the Thammasat University Research Fund
448
under the Research University Network (RUN) Initiative (No.8/2560) for research funding.
449 450
References
451
[1] UNEP, 2014 Green Economy Initiative. http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy.
452
[2]
R. Watson, Final report, Bioeconomy investment summit, European Commission,
453
Luxembourg,
454
bioecosummit.draft.18Feb_noTC. pdf.
455
[3]
2015.
http://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf
/report_
EIA. n.d. Biodiesel production in the U.S. from 2001 to 2016 (in million gallons). Statista.
456
Available from https://www.statista.com/statistics/509875/production-volume-of-biodiesel-in-
457
the-us/ (accessed 7 September, 2017).
458
[4]
FAPRI. n.d. Biodiesel consumption in the European Union from 2010 to 2025 (in million
459
gallons)*. Statista. available from https://www.statista.com/statistics/ 202237/eu-biodiesel-
460
consumption-from-2010/. (accessed 7 September, 2017)
461
[5]
FAPRI. n.d. Biodiesel production in the U.S. from 2010 to 2025 (in million gallons)*. Statista.
462
Available
from
https://www.statista.com/statistics/202150/us-biodiesel-production-from-
463
2010/. (accessed 7 September, 2017)
19 464
[6]
D. Rehagan, Biodiesel Industry Continues Growth through Unified Efforts, Challenges
465
Remain.
466
2070327/biodiesel-industry-continues-growth-through-unified-efforts-challenges-remain.
467
[7]
[8]
2017.
http://www.biodieselmagazine.com
/articles/
E. Lotero, Y. Liu, D.E. Lopez, K. Suwannakarn, D.A. Bruce, J.G. Jr. Goodwin, Synthesis of
H.L. Tran, Y.J. Ryu, D.H. Seong, S.M. Lim, C.G. Lee, An effective acid catalyst for biodiesel production from impure raw feedstocks, Biotechnol. Bioprocess. Eng. 18 (2013) 242–247.
470 471
Magazine,
biodiesel via acid catalysis, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005) 5353–5363.
468 469
Biodiesel
[9]
M. Di Serio, R. Tesser, M. Dimiccoli, F. Cammarota, M. Nastasi, E. Santacesaria, Synthesis
472
of biodiesel via homogeneous Lewis acid catalyst, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 239 (2005) 111–
473
115.
474
[10] Q. Shu, J. Gao, Z. Nawaz, Y. Liao, D. Wang, J. Wang, Synthesis of biodiesel from waste
475
vegetable oil with large amounts of free fatty acids using a carbon-based solid acid catalyst,
476
App. Energ. 87 (2010) 2589–2596.
477
[11] T.T. Liu, Z.L. Li, W. Li, C.J. Shi, Y. Wang, Preparation and characterization of biomass
478
carbon-based solid acid catalyst for the esterification of oleic acid with methanol, Bioresour.
479
Technol. 133 (2013) 618–621.
480
[12] B. Zhang, J. Ren, X. Liu, Y. Guo, G. Lu, Y. Wang, Novel sulfonated carbonaceous materials
481
from p-toluenesulfonic acid/glucose as a high-performance solid-acid catalyst, Catal.
482
Commun. 11 (2010) 629–632.
483
[13] F.-L. Pua, Z. Fang, S. Zakaria, F. Guo, C.-H. Chia, Direct production of biodiesel from high-
484
acid value Jatrophaoil with solid acid catalyst derived from lignin, Biotechnol. Biofuels 4
485
(2011) 56–64.
486
[14] J. Wang, W. Xu, J. Ren, X. Liu, G. Lu, Y. Wang, Efficient catalytic conversion of fructose
487
into hydroxymethylfurfural by a novel carbon-based solid acid, Green Chem. 13 (2011)
488
2678−2681.
20 489
[15] P.A. Russo, M.M. Antunes, P. Neves, P.V. Wiper, E. Fazio, F. Neri, F. Barreca, L. Mafra, M.
490
Pillinger, N. Pinna, A.A. Valente, Solid acids with SO3H groups and tunable surface properties:
491
versatile catalysts for biomass conversion. J. Mater. Chem. A 30 (2014) 11813−11824.
492 493
[16] Renewable Fuels Association (RFA). Ethanol industry statistics, Washington, DC, USA, 2017. www.ethanolrfaorg.
494
[17] Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), United States Department of Labor.
495
Ethanol processing, Section IV: Chapter 5, OSHA Technical Manual, Washington, DC, USA,
496
n.d. https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/index.html.
497 498
[18] Agricultural Statistics of Thailand 2017, Office of Agricultural Economics, Thailand. http://www.oae.go.th/assets/portals/1/files/jounal/2561/thailandtradestat2560.pdf.
499
[19] A. Boonsombuti, K. Tangmanasakul, J. Nantapipat, K. Komolpis, A. Luengnaruemitchai, S.
500
Wongkasemjit, Production of biobutanol from acid-pretreated corncob using Clostridium
501
beijerinckii TISTR 1461: Process optimization studies, Prep. Biochem. Biotech. 46 (2016)
502
141–149.
503
[20] C. Thunyaratchatanon, J. Jitjamnong, A. Luengnaruemitchai, N. Numwong, N. Chollacoop,
504
Y. Yoshimura, Influence of Mg modifier on cis-trans selectivity in partial hydrogenation of
505
biodiesel using different metal types, Appl. Catal. A 520 (2016) 170 –177.
506
[21] L. Burhenne, J. Messmer, T. Aicher, M.P. Laborie, The effect of the biomass components
507
lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose on TGA and fixed bed pyrolysis, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
508
101 (2013) 177–184.
509
[22] A. Luengnaruemitchai, C. Anupapwisetkul, Surface morphology and cellulose structure of
510
Napier grass pretreated with the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate combined
511
with either water or dimethyl sulfoxide as a co-solvent under microwave irradiation, Biomass
512
Convers. Biorefin. (2019) In press.
513 514
[23] M. Brebu, C. Vasile, Thermal degradation of lignin – A review, Cellulose Chem. Technol. 44 (2010) 353–363.
21 515
[24] I. Abed, M. Paraschiv, K. Loubar, F. Zagrouba, M. Tazerout, Thermogravimetric
516
investigation and thermal conversion kinetics of typical North African and Middle Eastern
517
lignocellulosic wastes, BioRes. 7 (2012) 1200–1220.
518
[25] S. Shankar, J.P. Reddy, J.-W. Rhim, Effect of lignin on water vapor barrier, mechanical, and
519
structural properties of agar/lignin composite films, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 81 (2015) 267–
520
273.
521
[26] S.N. Monteiro, V. Calado, F.M. Margem, R.J.S. Rodriguez, Thermogravimetric Stability
522
Behavior of Less Common Lignocellulosic Fibers – a Review, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 1
523
(2012) 189–199.
524 525 526 527
[27] N.S. Hassan, K.H. Badri, Thermal behaviors of oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber upon exposure to acid-base aqueous solutions, MJAS 20 (2016) 1095–1103. [28] S. Kumar, Y.S. Negi, J.S. Upadhyaya, Studies on Characterization of Corn Cob Based Nanoparticles, Adv. Mater. Lett. 1 (2010) 246–253.
528
[29] A. Boonsombuti, A. Luengnaruemitchai, S. Wongkasemjit, Effect of phosphoric acid
529
pretreatment of corncobs on the fermentability of Clostridium beijerinckii TISTR 1461 for
530
biobutanol production, Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 45 (2015) 173–191.
531 532 533 534
[30] L. Geng, G. Yu, Y. Wang, Y. Zhu, Y. Ph-SO3H-modified mesoporous carbon as an efficient catalyst for the esterification of oleic acid, Appl. Catal., A. 427−428 (2012) 137−144. [31] K. Namwong (2014) M.S. Thesis, The Petroleum and Petrochemical College, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
535
[32] H.T. Varghese, C.Y. Panciker, G.M. Warrier, M. Nair, K. Raju, Vibrational spectroscopic
536
studies and abinitio calculations of p-chlorobenzenesulfonic acid, Int. J. Chem. Sci. 7 (2009)
537
2278–2284.
538
[33] G. Akiyama, R. Matsuda, H. Sato, M. Takata, S. Kitagawa, Cellulose hydrolysis by a new
539
porous coordination polymer decorated with sulfonic acid functional groups, Adv. Mater. 23
540
(2011) 3294−3297.
22 541 542 543 544
[34] W.E. Farneth, R.J. Gorte, Methods for characterizing zeolite acidity, Chem. Rev. 95 (1995) 615–635. [35] Y. Zhang, W.-T. Wong, F.-K. Yung, Biodiesel production via esterification of oleic acid catalyzed by chlorosulfonic acid modified zirconia, App. Energ. 116 (2004) 191–198.
545
[36] A. Aldana-Pérez, L. Lartundo-Rojas, R. Gómez, M.E. Niño-Gómez, Sulfonic groups
546
anchored on mesoporous carbon Starbons-300 and its use for the esterification of oleic acid,
547
Fuel 100 (2012) 128–139.
548
[37] A. Shokrolahi, A. Zali, H.R. Pouretedal, A. Mousaviazar, Preparation of ordered sulfonated
549
mesoporous polymer (OMP-TsOH) from p-toluenesulfonic acid and application in
550
esterification reaction of fatty acids, J. Braz.Chem. Soc. 23 (2012) 1186–1192.
551
[38] M.J.J. Toro, X. Dou, I. Ajewole, J. Wang, K. Chong, N. Ai, G. Zeng, T. Chen, Preparation
552
and optimization of macroalgae-derived solid acid catalysts, Waste Biomass Valori. (2017) 1–
553
12.
554 555
[39] M. Li, D. Chen, X. Zhu, Preparation of solid acid catalyst from rice husk char and its catalytic performance in esterification, Chinese J. Catal. 34 (2013) 1674–1682.
556
[40] J.F. Moulder, W.F. Strickle, P.E. Sobol, K.D. Bomben, Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron
557
Spectroscopy, Perkin-Elmer Corporation (Physical Electronics), Eden Prairie, Minnesota,
558
1992.
559 560
[41] L. Adams, A. Oki, T. Grady, H. McWhinney, Z. Luo, Preparation and characterization of sulfonic acid-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes, Physica.E, 2009, 41, 723–728.
561
[42] G.M.A. Bureros, A.A. Tanjay, D.E.S. Cuizon, A.W. Go, L.K. Cabatingan, R.C. Agapay, Y.-
562
H. Ju, Cacao shell-derived solid acid catalyst for esterification of oleic acid with methanol,
563
Renew. Energ. 138 (2019) 489–501.
564 565
[43] K. Ngaosuwan, J.G. Jr. Goodwin, P. Prasertdham, A green sulfonated carbon-based catalyst derived from coffee residue for esterification, Renew. Energ. 86 (2016) 262–269.
23 566
[44] H. Pan, X. Liu, H. Zhen, K. Yang, S. Huang, S. Yan, Multi-SO3H functionalized mesoporous
567
polymeric acid catalyst for biodiesel production and fructose-to-biodiesel additive conversion,
568
Renew. Energ. 107 (2017) 245–252.
569 570
[45] R. Jia, J. Ren, X. Liu, G. Lu, Y. Wang, Design and synthesis of sulfonated carbons with amphiphilic properties, J. Mater. Chem. A 29 (2014) 11195–11201.
571
[46] H.N. Chamidy and Riniati, The use of heterogeneous catalysts of chitosan sulfonate bead on
572
the esterification reaction of oleic acid and methanol, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 202
573
(2017) 012017.
574
[47] N. Gokulakrishnan, A. Pandurangan, P.K. Sinham, Esterification of acetic acid with propanol
575
isomers under autogeneous pressure: A catalytic activity study of Al-MCM-41 molecular
576
sieves, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 263 (2007) 55 –61.
577 578
[48] A.A. Kiss, A.C. Dimian, G. Rothenberg, Solid acid catalysts for biodiesel production – towards sustainable energy, Adv. Synth. Catal. 348 (2006) 75–81.
579
[49] H. Ma, J. Li, W. Liu, B. Cheng, X. Cao, J. Mao, S. Zhu, Hydrothermal preparation and
580
characterization of novel corncob-derived solid acid catalysts, J. Agric. Food Chem. 62
581
(2014) 5345–5353.
582
24 583
TABLE CAPTIONS
584
Table 1 Physical and chemical properties of the materials and FAME yield.
585 586
FIGURE CAPTIONS
587
Fig. 1 Representative TGA profiles of the fresh corncob, commercial lignin and sulfonated
588 589 590
materials.
Fig. 2 Representative XRD patterns of the (a) fresh corncob, (b) pretreated corncob, (c) C-H2SO4 catalyst and (d) C-TsOH-10 catalyst.
591
Fig. 3 Representative SEM images at 3,000 x magnification of the (a) fresh corncob, (b) pretreated
592
corncob, (c) C-H2SO4, (d) C-TsOH-5, (e) C-TsOH-10, (f) C-TsOH-15, (g) C-TsOH-20, (h)
593
C-M-3-10, (i) C-M-15-10, (j) commercial lignin, (k) L-H2SO4 and (l) L-TsOH-10.
594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603
Fig. 4 Representative FT-IR spectra of the (a) fresh corncob, (b) pretreated corncob, (c) C-H2SO4 and (d) C-TsOH-10
Fig. 5 Representative NH3-TPD profiles of the (a) C-H2SO4, (b) C-TsOH-5, (c) C-TsOH-10, (d) CTsOH-15, (e) C-TsOH-20, (f) C-M-3-10, (g) C-M-15-10, (h) L-H2SO4 and (i) L-TsOH-10.
Fig. 6 Representative XPS spectra of C 1s of the (A) C-H2SO4 and (B) C-TsOH-10 catalysts and S 2p of the (C) C-H2SO4 and (D) C-TsOH-10 catalysts.
Fig. 7 Effect of the reaction time on the FAME yield in the presence of either the C-TsOH-10 or the C-H2SO4 catalyst at 60 °C.
Fig. 8 Effect of the reaction temperature on the FAME yield in the presence of the C-TsOH-10 catalyst.
Table 1 Physical and chemical properties of the materials and FAME yield Material
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Sulfur
C/Ha
Surface
Pore volume
Avg. pore
Acid quantityb
FAME yieldc
area (m2/g)
(cm3/g)
diameter (nm)
(mmol/g)
(%)
Fresh corncob
50.50
6.03
0.68
0.26
8.4
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
C-H2SO4
56.30
3.44
0.24
3.72
16.4
14.1
0.03
154.5
1.93±0.01
86.5 ± 0.6
C-TsOH-5
67.90
4.34
0.27
5.69
15.6
71.7
0.14
58.8
0.35±0.03
73.2 ± 1.1
C-TsOH-10
68.20
3.88
0.18
5.98
17.6
241.0
0.14
3.5
0.58±0.03
80.4 ± 0.9
C-TsOH-15
72.50
4.50
0.13
4.62
16.1
290.4
0.26
3.7
0.60±0.02
77.6 ± 1.1
C-TsOH-20
71.80
4.59
0.14
4.41
15.6
297.5
0.28
3.7
0.62±0.03
76.4 ± 2.1
C-M-3-10
71.00
4.37
0.24
3.22
16.2
371.1
0.29
2.1
0.63±0.03
74.2 ± 1.2
C-M-15-10
69.90
4.13
0.15
3.93
16.9
360.5
0.29
2.4
0.60±0.02
75.4 ± 1.4
Commercial Lignin
49.90
5.41
0.11
4.81
9.2
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
L-H2SO4
53.40
3.32
0.13
6.44
16.1
62.4
0.06
3.3
1.20 ± 0.03
78.2 ± 0.7
L-TsOH-10
67.30
3.88
0.10
7.90
17.3
10.0
0.01
6.3
0.32 ± 0.01
39.5 ± 2.0
a
measured by CHNS analyzer,
b
c
determined by titration method, measured by GC
Figure 1
Figure 2
a)
c)
b)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
l)
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Research highlights
•
Corncob-derived residue can be as a starting material for the production for the esterification.
•
Both TsOH and H2SO4/TsOH mixtures can be used as effective sulfonating agents.
•
TSsOH sulfonated sample presented a considerable increase in surface area.
•
H2SO4 and TsOH sulfonated materials gave high methyl oleate (FAME) yields.