Vol.
131,
No. 3, 1985
September
30,
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Pages 1086-1093
1985
cDNA CLONES ENCODING BOVINE INTERPHOTORECEPTOR RETINOID BINDING PROTEIN David J. Barrett,* Daniel D. Oprian,+
T. Michael Redmond,* Barbara Wiggert,’ Gerald J. Chader,” and John M. Nickerson”
*Laboratory
of Retinal Cell and Molecular Biology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD +Department of Biology and Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Received
August
8,
1985
We have isolated a cDNA clone (AIRBP-1) for bovine interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) by immunological screening of a bovine retinal Xgtll cDNA expression library. This clone contained a cDNA insert 325 bp in length. A 250 bp fragment of this cDNA was used to screen a bovine resulting in the isolation of two larger cDNA retina AgtlO cDNA library, clones containing inserts of 2.5 kb (XIRBP-2) and 1.5 kb (XIRBP-3). Restriction endonuclease mapping revealed all three clones to have an EcoR I restriction site. The 250 bp fragment of XIRBP-1 and the 2000 bp fragment of AIRBP-2 both hybridized to a single bovine retinal mRNA species approximately 8 kb in length; there was no hybridization with either chicken lens or liver RNA. The amino acid sequence of a tryptic peptide from authentic IRBP has been obtained. The deduced amino acid sequence from the cDNA nucleotide sequence is the same as this authentic peptide. This definitively establishes the identity of the cDNA clones as encoding bovine IRBP. 0 1985 Academic Press,
Inc.
Interphotoreceptor interstitial
Retinoid-Binding
retinoid-binding M, in the
(146,000
cow)
interphotoreceptor epithelium neural into (9). retinoid
retina, the
IPS,
it it
neural
in a light-dependent
protein
Abbreviations: bp, base pairs.
a role
has been
by the
found
HPLC, high
0006-291X/85 $1.50 Copyright 0 I985 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
and,
(l-3,10,11
).
ocular
disease retinal
liquid
1086
a large in the
of the
pigment
is
cells
known as
found
synthesized
most
soluble
protein
interestingly
states.
degenerations
chromatography;
by the
and secreted
(6-8)
70% of the readily
in hereditary
performance
The protein
retinoid
in specific
is
(I-4)
layers
photoreceptor
exogenous manner
tissue
(5).
about
also
glycoprotein
the
retina
constitutes carries
matrix
between
most probably
IRBP may play this
(IPS)
(IRBP),
or 7s receptor
extracellular
and the
IPS where
In the
protein
space
(PE)
Protein
binds
A decrease (lZ,l3).
Kb, kilobases;
in In
Vol.
131,
No. 3, 1985
an allied
hereditary
also
apparent
BIOCHEMICAL
disease,
in retinal
making
it
(14).
In an autoimmune
IRBP into
likely
the
Because
footpad of the
and well-defined its
molecular
three
cDNA clones peptide
MATERIALS
which
loss
causes unique
matrix
sequences
bovine for
protein,
As a first
injection
step,
in IRBP is
morphological disease of highly in the
we thought we now report establish
it
damage
process purified rat
as a retinoid-binding
IRBP and unequivocally this
in the
uveoretinitis
of IRBP both
COMMUNICATIONS
decrease
minimal
event
system,
experimental nature
biology. for
demonstrate
model
RESEARCH
a striking
is an early
disease
extracellular
study
encode
this
BIOPHYSICAL
choroideremia,
areas
that
AND
(15). protein
of importance
to
the
of
that
isolation they
protein.
AND METHODS
Purification of Bovine IRBP. A crude interphotoreceptor matrix wash was obtained by soaking frozen bovine retinas (Hormel) in Dulbecco’s phosphatebuffered saline (1 ml per retina) for approximately 2 hours with occasional gentle stirring at 4V. The mixture was centrifuged for 20 min at 5,000 g, and the resulting supernatant was centrifuged at 100,000 g for 30 min. IRBP was purified from the supernatant using concanavalin A-Sepharose affinity chromatography followed by ion-exchange and size exclusion HPLC (16). Purity of the final IRBP preparation was assessed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by silver staining. Determination of IRBP Protein Sequence. Approximately 700 ug (5 nanomoles) of bovine IRBP was digested using trypsin-TPCK (Worthington) at an enzyme:substrate ratio of 1:50 for 22 l/2 hours at 37°C. This digest was fractionated by HPLC using a Bondapak Cl8 column, eluting with a gradient of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in H2C to 0.1% TFA in 80% 2-propanol. Specific peaks were lyophilized and rechromatographed using the same system but eluting with a gradient starting with 25 mM ammonium acetate, pH 6.0, and ending with a solution of (1:1.5) 50mM ammonium acetate:2-propanol. Individual peaks were collected and lyophilized. Peaks that indicated high yield and purity were then subjected to microsequencing on an Applied Biosystems 470A gas-phase protein sequencer (17). The resultant phenylthiohydantoin amino acids were identified by HPLC (18). Preparation of Anti-IRBP. Antiserum to purified bovine IRBP was obtained by 4 intramuscular injections (6OOpg each) of a female Nubian goat. The antiserum was absorbed against h bacteriophage and bacterial antigens using a cyanogen bromide activated Sepharose 48 column (19) linked with lysate from heat shocked E. coli BNN97 (20,21 ). Immunoelectrophoresis of homogenized bovine retina and eye cup washings and pure bovine IRBP revealed a single arc verifying the monospecificity of the antibody. Agtll Library Preparation. Bovine retina RNA was prepared by the guanidine thiocyanate method (22,23). Poly(A)+ RNA was isolated bv oligo(dT)-cellulose chromatography (24). First strand synthesis was via AMV Second strand synthesis was by the large fragment of reverse transcriptase. DNA Polymerase I (25). After Sl nuclease digestion the cDNA was treated with EcoR I methylase, and EcoR I linkers were added. Following EcoR I digestion, the cDNA was ligated into the EcoR I site of Xgtll, and packaged. About 350,000 independent h phage plaques were amplified in Y1088 (21). Screening of the Bovine Retina cDNA Library. The amplified hgtll library was plated on 2x YT agar, expression was induced with isopropyl 1087
Vol.
131,
No. 3, 1985
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
b-D-thiogalactopyranoside, and the fusion proteins were transferred to DA85 nitrocellulose filters (Schleicher and Schuell). These filters were washed in 50mM Tris pH 8.0, 150mM NaCl and 20% fetal calf serum, then incubated with the absorbed goat anti-bovine IRBP antiserum, washed and incubated with rabbit anti-goat IgG to which horseradish peroxidase had been conjugated (Miles) (20,21,26). Control filters containing purified bovine IRBP, E. coli BNN97 lysate, and wild type (no cDNA inserts) Agtll bacteriophage were incubated and developed in an identical fashion. The positive clones were plaque purified, and rescreened serially until all plaques were positive on a filter. While several different plaques were picked from the initial screening, only one original plaque was carried through the entire procedure. Subcloning into Ml 3 mp8 and -mpl8 and Nucleotide Sequence Analysis. The EcoR I fragments from the cDNA clones were isolated and ligated into the EcoR I site of bacteriophage Ml3 mp18 vector (27) and used to transform E. coli JMI Olr-. The 2 Kb EcoR I cDNA fragment from hIRBP-2 was sheared by sonication, .blunt-ended and ligated into the Sma I site of Ml3 mp8 (28) with minor modification (29) of the method of Deininger (30). Nucleotide sequencing was by the chain terminator method (31) using 35S-dATP and salt gradient gels (32). Hybridization to RNA Blots. Bovine retinas were dissected from fresh eyes and RNA was isolated by the guanidine thiocyanate/CsCl method (22,23 ). Poly(A)+ RNA was obtained by oligo(dT)-cellulose chromatography (24). Total The RNA RNA, from chicken lens and liver were also prepared as controls. samples were electrophoresed on a denaturing formamide-formaldehyde gel (33) The and transferred to a nylon membrane (Gene Screen, New England Nuclear). 250 bp fragment of clone XIRBP-1 and the 2000 bp fragment of clone AIRBP-2 were labeled with 32P-dCTP by nick translation (34) and used to probe the filters. Blots were washed 2 times in 2 x SSC at room temperature and 4 times at 52OC in 0.1 x SSC 0.1 I SDS for about 15 min per wash.
RESULTS Isolation clone
for
and Characterization
IRBP was obtained
4 x 106 phage using This
clone,
dization-positive
XIRBP-2
were
clones analyzed
to have a 2.5
and 500 bp, and clone fragments
screening
further.
obtained
of approximately
enzyme
bovine
retina
(23,36,37).
1088
of was
cDNA library Sixteen
Two clones (Fig.
EcoR I fragments
of a 1.5 kb cDNA insert
1500 bp and 50 bp.
1).
EcoR I digestion
enzyme digestion
containing
to consist
(Fig.
The 250 bp fragment
and purified.
Restriction
kb cDNA insert XIRBP-3
techniques
(20,21),
probe
by restriction
a hgtl0
cDNA
of approximately
library
as the
of 250 bp and 75 bp.
were
(26)
a 325 bp cDNA insert.
to screen
One putative
cDNA expression
and analyzed
revealed
plaque
screening
IRBP antibody
was purified
fragments
standard
retina
anti-bovine
and used as a probe
using
hIRBP-3)
bovine
2) which
cDNA yielded
isolated (35)
goat
AIRBP-1, (Fig.
by immunological
a hgtll
monospecific
digestion the
from
of IRBP cDNA Clones.
hybri-
(XIRBP-2
and
2) showed of 2000 with
bp
EcoR I
Vol.
131,
BIOCHEMICAL
No. 3. 1985
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
WILD TYPE Agtll BACTERIOPHAGE PLAQUES (NO cDNA INSERTS)
**
,*
1_ * mi
I ,’ I 1”
_
*
_. _*
il*
1 3 10
0
‘-
0.1 0.3
POSITIVE PLAQUES FROM IIRBPl CLONE (CONTAINS IRBP cDNA
‘/”
ng OF PURIFIED
INSERT)
STANDARDS E. COLI LYSATE
IRBP
Figure 1. Screening of a Agtll bovine retina cDNA expression library with anti-(bovine IRBP) antibodies. Top. Wild type hgtll plaques which contain no cDNA inserts give no positive signals. [diddle. After serial screenings and plaque purification a clone containing a 325 bp cDNA insert was identified that Purified gave positive signals with anti-(bovine IRBP) antibodies. Bottom. bovine IRBP from 0 to 10 ng was mixed with 100 pg/ml bovine serum albumin and spotted onto nitrocellulose and tested with anti-bovine IRBP with the above filters. E. coli BNN97 lysate (2 ~1 at 80 mg/ml) was also spotted onto the filters.
Eco Rl AlRBPl (325 bpl
5’1
Taq 1 Taq 1 AIRBP3 (1.5 Kb)
1
Taq 1
1
Eco Rl Kpn
1
5.‘3?
Taq 1 AIRBP2 (2.5 Kb)
Kpn
Hind
I
I
III 1
13
Eco Rl
u
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
KILOEASES
Figure -digested
2.
Restriction with the the restriction
maps of three bovine IRBP cDNA clones. The three clones indicated restriction enzymes. In the case of Taq I the order of fragments was not unequivocally determined where identified by brackets. There are no Bgl I, Sma I, Sph I, Sal I, or BamH I sites in any of the clones. A limited nucleotide sequence analysis has verified the order of the EcoR I fragments and overlaps of the 3 clones. The 3’ end of URBP-2 does not correspond to the 3’ end of the mRNA, since it does not contain Poly(A) by sequence analysis. 1089
3.5
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 131, No. 3, 1985
IRPB
NUCLEOTIDE
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
AND
AMINO
ACID
SEQUENCE
3. Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence with an authentic amino acid sequence from an IRBP tryptic identity unequivocally establishes that these cDNA clones
from
Figure
the
peptide. encode
cDNA clones This bovine IRBP
and provides amino acid sequence of IRBP from an internal tryptic peptide. The underlined amino acid residues in the tryptic peptide sequence are the most but their identification was not absolutely likely amino acid residues, positive. The top line is the authentic amino acid sequence, the middle is the deduced amino acid sequence predicted from the mRNA. The bottom line is the nucleotide sequence of the cDNA, which contains the unique Kpn I site shown in Fig. 2.
Analysis clones
were
were
shown
revealed
we have
from
AIRBP-2.
species Fig.
the
match.
This
identity
unequivocally
authentic
size
of the mRNA for
for
the
sequence
from
deduced
a 3.
A
amino
acid
establishes
IRBP.
as chicken
The RNAs were
transferred
250 bp fragment
Both
probes 8
kb long
size
and lens
to a nylon AIRBP-1
to a unique
in bovine
retina
stringency
molecular
weight
synthesized
in the
photoreceptor
cell
bovine 4 kb.
IRBP,
mRNAs for
have large
of transducin
(38)
1090
membrane
and probed
2000 bp fragment
exceptionally
This
retina
RNAs by gel
large
and poly(A)+
to chicken
of washing.
to exceed
bovine total
or the
total
was no hybridization
of mRNA encoding
a-subunit
liver
from
hybridized
there
to high
predicted
the
IRBP, we separated
RNA as well
As expected,
are
cDNA clones
acid
in Figure
a perfect
polypeptide
examples
shown
with
translated
RNAs at moderate with
IRBP and is also
Some
(31).
was obtained
sequence
approximately 4).
sequence
amino
acid
the
electrophoresis. nick
deduced
igt
3
sequences
method
amino
and poly(A)+
with
acid
the
Nucleotide
terminator
corresponding
from
Analysis.
To measure total
analysis.
chain
amino bovine
cDNA fragments
authentic
isolated
RNA Blot
sequence
and the
of purified
of this
for
Several
dideoxynucleotide
Authentic
3.
peptide
sequence
Ml3
sequence
in Fig.
comparison
into
by the
nucleotide
tryptic
that
subcloned
determined
of the is
of IRBP cDNA sequences.
result
lens is
estimated other
RNA (See or liver
consistent by its
retinal
3’ untranslated
and rhodopsin
RNA
proteins regions,
(35)
which
two have
Vol.
131,
No. 3, 1985
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BOVINE RETINA m-
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
CHICKEN
Figure 4. Northern Blot Analysis. Bovine retina total RNA and Poly(A)+ RNAs (two independent preparations) and chicken lens and liver total RNAs were blotted and probed with the 2.0 kb XIRBP-2 cDNA insert. Only electrophoresed, an 8 kb RNA species was identified in retina RNA specific for IRBP.
untranslated also
regions
synthesized
region
of
present size. of this
size.
normal
homologous
bovine
be able
kb,
expression
will
for
kb
its
is
apparently
remarkable
with
untranslated
at 2.6
kb (40)
of IRBP at the
Cultured
demonstrates
to produce
human probes,
LDL receptor
states.
conditions,
3’ untranslated
of up to 4
accounting
6-transducin,
mRNA
regions and inter-
(41).
to study
which
Whereas
has a typical
region IRBP,
are the
and pathological
culture
(39)
untranslated
up to 3.9
can be induced
defined
respectively.
kb,
few mRNAs have been identified
human retinoblastoma
its
I.4
photoreceptor,
Two examples
We now will
tance,
.2 and
A large
a very
2 receptor,
both
1
in the mRNA encoding Only
lukin
in the bp.
142
of
Y-73 cells,
a distinct
IRBP by
butyrate
and in conjunction be crucial
in the 1091
derived
genetic (42). with study
gene level
in
from
a
mode of inheriThis our
system
under
cDNA clones
of IRBP control
or and
Vol.
131,
No. 3, 1985
BIOCHEMICAL
synthesis.
The analysis
polypeptide
is also
have been sequenced. the monkey protein bovine this
protein corresponds
large
a-transducin, aspect
conserved
a terminal
region
the two other
of gene expression
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
of the gene, mRNA and the amino acids
of IRBP
in the cow and monkey, but
5 amino acid sequence not found in the
DNA sequence analysis
in this
divergence of the bovine
of the IRBP mRNA (8
untranslated
structures
They are strongly
processing
size
BIOPHYSICAL
Only the N-terminal
of interest.
to evolutionary
post-translational exceptional
of the primary
contains
(16).
AND
kb)
will
of the sequences IRBP polypeptide.
is of particular
along with
similar
regions
proteins
studied
to date,
in photoreceptor
region
determine
if
or to co-or The
interest.
in rhodopsin may indicate
The and a unique
cells.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to thank Dr. J. Nathans for kindly providing his bovine AgtlO retina cDNA library. We also thank Drs. D. Borst, J. Dean, D. Lenar, and E. Ginns for helpful discussions. We are indebted to Drs. P.-M. Yuan and R.W. Blather of Applied Biosystems for their help in the isolation and sequencing of peptides. REFERENCES Wiggert, B., Bergsma, D.R., Lewis, M. and Chader, G.J. (1977) Neurochem. 29: 947-954. Lai, Y., Wiggert, B., Liu, Y. and Chader, G. (1982) Nature 2. 1.
J. 198:
848-849. 3. 4.
Liou, G.J., Bridges, C.D., Fong, S., Alvarez, R.A. and Gonzalez-Fernandez, F. (1982) Vision Res. 22: 1457-1467. Adler, A.J. and Martin, K.J., (1982) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 103: 1601-1608.
5. 6. 7. 8.
Bunt-Milam, A.H. and Saari, J.C. (1983) J. Cell. Biol. 97: 703-712. Hollyfield, J.G., Fliesler, S.J., Reyborn, M.E., Fong, S., Landers, R.A. and Bridges, C.D. (1985) Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 26: 58-67. P.J. and Chader, G.J. (1984) Biochem. Wiggert, B, Lee, L., O'Brien, Biophys. Res. Commun. 118: 789-796. R-A., Gonzalez-Fernandez, Fong, S., Liou, G.I., Landers, R.A., Alvarez, F ., Glazebrook, P.A., Lam, O.M. and Bridges, C.D. (1984) J. Neurochem. -42: 1667-1675.
9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.
Pfeffer, B., Wiggert, B., Lee, L., Zonnenberg, B., Newsome, D. and Chader, G. (1983) J. Cell. Physiol. 117: 333-341. Saari, J.C., Bredberg, L. and Garwin, G.G. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 259: 13329-l 3333. Adler, A.J. and Evans, C.D. (1983) Biochem. Biophys. Acta 761: 217-222. Bergsma, D., Wiggert, B., Funahashi, M., Kuwabara, T. and Chader, G. (1977) Nature 265: 66-67. Bridges, C., Alvarez, R. and Fong, S.-L. (1982) Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 24 (Suppl): 141a. RodriEes, M.M., Ballintine, E.J., Wiggert, B.N., Lee, L., Fletcher, R.T. and Chader, G.J. (1984) Ophthalmology 91: 873-883. Cery, I., Wiggert, B., Redmond, M., Kuwabara, T., Crawford, M.A., Vistica, B.P. and Chader, G.J. (1985) Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 26 (Suppl): 77a. 1092
Vol.
16. 17.
la. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26.
27. 28. 29.
30. 31. 32. 33.
131,
35. 36. 37. 38.
39. 40. 41. 42.
BIOCHEMICAL
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
Redmond, T.M., Wiggert, B., Robey, F.A., Nguyen, N.Y., Lewis, M.S., Lee, L. and Chader, G.J. (1985) Biochemistry 24: 787-793. Hewick, R.M., Hunkapiller, M.W., Wood, L.E. and Dreyer, W.J. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 7990-7997. Hunkapiller, M.W. and Hood, L.E. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 91: 486-493. Kohn, J. and Wilchek, M. (1982) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 107:
878-884. Young, R.A. and Davis, R.W. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 80: 1194-1198. Young, R.A. and Davis, R.W. (1983) Science. 222: 778-782. IJllrich, A., Shine, J., Chirgwin, J., Pictet, R., Tischer, E., Rutter, W.J. and Goodman, H.M. (1977) Science 196: 1313-1319. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E.F. and Sambrook, J. (1982) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, New York. Acad. Sci (USA) 69: 1408-1412. Aviv, H. and Leder, P. (1972) Proc. Natl. J. Biol. Chem. 253: Wickens, M.P., Buell, G.N. and Schimke, R.T. (1970) 2483-2495. DeWet, J.R., Fukushima, H., Dewjii, N.N., Wilcox, E., O'Brien, J.S. and Helinski, D.R. (1984) DNA 3: 437-447. Norrander, J., Kempe, T. and Messing, J. (1983) Gene 26: 101-106. Messing, J. and Vieira, J. (1982) Gene 19: 269-276. Nickerson, J-M., Wawrousek, E.F., Hajikins, J.W., Wakil, A.S., Wistow, C.J., Thomas, G., Norman, B.L. and Piatigorsky, J. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. (in press). Deininger, P.L. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 129, 216-223. S. and Coulson, A.R. (197'7) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Sanger r (USA) ;4F';46N:_C:;:;' . Biggin, il.D., Gibson, T.J. and Hong, F.F. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 80: 3963-3965. Lehrach, H., Diamond, D., Wozney, J.M. and Boedtker (1977) Biochemistry 16:
34.
No. 3, 1985
4743-4751.
Maniatis, T., Jeffrey, A. and Kleid, D.G. (1975) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 72: 1184-1188. Nathans, J. and Hogness, D.S. (1983) Cell 34: 807-814. Benton, W.D. and Davis, R.W. (1977) Science 196: 180-182. Woo, S.L.C., DugaiczyK, A., Tsai, M.-J., Lai, E.C., Catterall, J.F. and O'Malley, B.W. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 75: 3688-3692. Tanabe, T., Nukada, T., Nishikawa, Y., Sugimoto, K.., Suzuki, H., Takahashi, H., Noda, M., Haga, T., Lchiyama, A., Kangawa, K., Minamino, N ., Matsuo, H. and Numa, S. (1985) Nature 315: 242-245. Yatsunami, K., Pandya, B.V., Oprian, D., Khorana, H.G. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. ,Sci. USA 82: 1936-1940. Yamamoto, T., Davis, C.G., Brown, M-S., Schneider, W.J., Casey, M.L., Goldstein, J.L., and Russell, D.W. (1984) Cell 39: 27-38. Miller, J., Maler, T.R., Leonard, W.J., Greene, W.C., Shevach, E.M., and Germain, R.N. (1985) J. Immunol. 134: 4212-4217. Kyritsis, A., Wiggert, B., Lee, L., Chader, G. (1985) Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 26 (Suppl): 17a.
1093