Cell-derived plasma membrane vesicles are permeable to hydrophilic macromolecules

Cell-derived plasma membrane vesicles are permeable to hydrophilic macromolecules

Journal Pre-proof Cell-derived plasma membrane vesicles are permeable to hydrophilic macromolecules A.D. Skinkle, K.R. Levental, I. Levental PII: S00...

3MB Sizes 0 Downloads 65 Views

Journal Pre-proof Cell-derived plasma membrane vesicles are permeable to hydrophilic macromolecules A.D. Skinkle, K.R. Levental, I. Levental PII:

S0006-3495(20)30068-0

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2019.12.040

Reference:

BPJ 10274

To appear in:

Biophysical Journal

Received Date: 9 August 2019 Accepted Date: 23 December 2019

Please cite this article as: Skinkle A, Levental K, Levental I, Cell-derived plasma membrane vesicles are permeable to hydrophilic macromolecules, Biophysical Journal (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.bpj.2019.12.040. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Biophysical Society.

1

TITLE: Cell-derived plasma membrane vesicles are permeable to hydrophilic macromolecules

2

AUTHORS: AD Skinkle1,2, KR Levental1, I Levental1,*

3

AFFILIATIONS:

4

1

5

Pharmacology, Houston, Texas 77030

6

2

7

*

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Department of Integrative Biology and

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Biological and Biomedical Sciences Program

corresponding author; [email protected]

8 9

ABSTRACT: Giant Plasma Membrane Vesicles (GPMVs) are a widely used experimental platform for

10

biochemical and biophysical analysis of isolated mammalian plasma membranes (PM). A core advantage

11

of these vesicles is that they maintain the native lipid and protein diversity of the plasma membrane while

12

affording the experimental flexibility of synthetic giant vesicles. In addition to fundamental investigations of

13

PM structure and composition, GPMVs have been used to evaluate the binding of proteins and small

14

molecules to cell-derived membranes, and the permeation of drug-like molecules through them. An

15

important assumption of such experiments is that GPMVs are sealed; i.e. that permeation occurs by

16

diffusion through the hydrophobic core rather than through hydrophilic pores. Here we demonstrate that

17

this assumption is often incorrect. We find that most GPMVs isolated using standard preparations are

18

passively permeable to various hydrophilic solutes as large as 40 kDa, in contrast to synthetic Giant

19

Unilamellar Vesicles (GUVs). We attribute this leakiness to stable, relatively large, and heterogeneous

20

pores formed by rupture of vesicles from cells. Finally, we identify preparation conditions that minimize

21

poration and allow evaluation of sealed GPMVs. These unexpected observations of GPMV poration

22

important for interpreting experiments utilizing GPMVs as plasma membrane models, particularly for drug

23

permeation and membrane asymmetry.

24 25

STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: A central assumption in using Giant Plasma Membrane Vesicles to

26

study membrane penetration and interactions is that these vesicles maintain the permeability barrier of the

27

native membrane from which they originate. Using large fluorescently-labeled hydrophilic probes, we

28

demonstrate that this assumption is often incorrect and conclude that macromolecular solutes permeate

29

GPMVs through stable pores formed during shear-induced rupture of vesicles from cells. Using these

30

insights into the mechanisms of poration, we demonstrate an approach to isolate sealed GPMVs.

31 32

INTRODUCTION

33 34

Model membranes are among the most widely used tools to investigate the physicochemical behaviors of

35

biological lipids, interactions between lipids and proteins, and the properties of lipid assemblies. While

36

synthetic lipid membranes effectively recapitulate certain aspects of biological membranes, it is not

37

experimentally feasible to construct model systems with the lipid diversity and protein density of living

38

cells. In this context, an important development in membrane biophysics has been the discovery (1) and

39

characterization of Giant Plasma Membrane Vesicles (GPMVs), which are isolated from live mammalian

40

cells as intact PM vesicles (2). These GPMVs fill a unique niche, maintaining the approximate lipid and

41

protein content of living membranes while offering the experimental tractability of synthetic models (3).

42

This combination has allowed investigation of PM composition (4), physical properties (5–7), dynamics (8,

43

9), and potentially signaling and transport (8, 10–13) in isolation from the complexity of living cells.

44 45

Because of these advantages, and despite several important caveats distinguishing isolated vesicles from

46

living membranes (3), GPMVs have become an important and widely used tool for membrane biophysics.

47

Perhaps their most notable feature is their spontaneous separation into coexisting liquid-ordered and

48

disordered membrane phases, allowing investigations into the properties and compositions of ordered

49

membrane domains, as models for lipid rafts (14–21). These vesicles have also been used in combination

50

with mass spectrometric lipidomics to characterize the detailed and comprehensive lipid profiles of PMs

51

and their remodeling during various cellular processes (22–24). Recently, GPMVs have also been

52

employed to study mechanisms of viral binding and fusion to the PM (25), as well as toxin binding (26).

53 54

In addition to their considerable utility for basic research, GPMVs have recently gained attention for

55

possible translational applications, particularly for their potential as drug delivery vehicles (27, 28) or for

56

studies of membrane permeability and poration (29–31). An important premise for these and other similar

57

studies is that GPMVs are sealed to extravesicular compounds. This assumption stems from analogy to

58

synthetic Giant Unilamellar Vesicles (GUVs), which are unambiguously sealed to permeation of

59

hydrophilic solutes (26, 32). Here, we report the surprising finding that GPMVs are permeable to large,

60

hydrophilic macromolecules. Probes as large as 40 kDa rapidly accumulate inside GPMVs, apparently

61

through stable aqueous pores. We investigate the mechanism for this surprising permeability and suggest

62

that stable pores are formed during shear-induced rupture of GPMVs from cells. Based on these

63

observations, we develop a technique to limit pore formation and image sealed GPMVs.

64 65

MATERIALS AND METHODS

66 67

Materials: The following lipids were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL) and used without

68

further purification: dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC), dioleoyl PC (DOPC) and cholesterol. Fast DiI

69

(Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), fluorescein- and TMR-labeled dextrans (Sigma, St. Louis, MO),

70

AlexaFluor-647-ATP (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH). Other chemicals, buffers, and media were

71

purchased from Sigma.

72 73

Cell culture: Rat basophilic leukemia (RBL) cells were maintained in medium containing 60% modified

74

Eagle’s medium (MEM), 30% RPMI, 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, 100 units/mL penicillin, and

75

100 µg/mL streptomycin at 37oC in humidified 5% CO2.

76

77

GPMV isolation and imaging: GPMVs were prepared as previously described (2). Briefly, cells were

78

washed in isolation buffer (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4) and then incubated with

79

isolation buffer supplemented with 25 mM paraformaldehyde (PFA) and 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) (or 2

80

mM N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) as indicated) for 1 h at 37oC (unless otherwise indicated). Before isolation,

81

cell membranes were labeled with 5 µg/mL of the membrane marker FAST DiI for 10 min on ice. After 1 h

82

incubation, the GPMV-rich cellular supernatant was transferred to a microcentrifuge tube, then

83

concentrated GPMVs were collected after 30 min sedimentation on ice. All imaging was done by confocal

84

microscopy on a Nikon A1R.

85 86

Quantification of GPMV leakiness: GPMVs were either prepared with (or incubated after isolation with)

87

250 nM AlexaFluor-647-ATP and/or 250 ng/mL fluorescein-labeled 3 kDa dextran. Confocal images were

88

then taken with the fluorescent molecules still in solution. In these images, the lumens of “sealed” vesicles

89

appear dark relative to the background fluorescence, whereas leaky vesicles have bright fluorescent

90

lumens (see Fig. 1). These images were analyzed using a custom-built algorithm in the open-source

91

software Cell Profiler. GPMVs were identified and masked as circular objects, then the median

92

fluorescence intensity (to eliminate edge-effects) of the vesicle lumen was calculated for each vesicle. The

93

fluorescence intensity of the bulk/background was calculated as the median intensity of all pixels outside

94

GPMVs. The “relative vesicle intensity” was calculated as the ratio of the intensity of the vesicle lumen to

95

the bulk intensity.

96 97

Although most “leaky” vesicles had an internal fluorescence that was approximately equal to bulk

98

fluorescence, some were slightly dimmer while others slightly brighter than the bulk fluorescence. Thus, a

99

“leaky” vesicle was defined as one whose intensity was at least 70% of bulk fluorescence (relative vesicle

100

intensity >0.7). Although this value is somewhat arbitrary, it was chosen because it generally segregated

101

the two populations of GPMVs that emerged in our analyses (e.g. Fig. 1D). Sealed vesicles also had non-

102

zero “relative vesicle intensities”, which would appear to suggest that some permeation still occurred.

103

Although we cannot absolutely rule out some leakage into apparently “dark” vesicles, it is much more likely

104

that the non-zero lumenal fluorescence comes from analyzing images with a very bright fluorescent

105

background. Even in confocal mode, some out-of-focus signal is detectable from above and below the

106

vesicle, and the magnitude of this signal depends on the size of the vesicle. Thus, there are no truly “dark”

107

pixels in our images, which prohibits accurate background subtraction. An example of this effect (non-zero

108

normalized intensity in putatively sealed vesicles) is shown in Fig. S1. Because of the large contrast

109

between the “sealed vesicle” lumens and the bright bulk fluorescence, and because most putatively sealed

110

vesicles had similar lumenal intensities, we believe they allow minimal permeation of the fluorescent

111

solutes.

112 113

Preparation of Giant Unilamellar Vesicles: GUVs were prepared by electroformation, as previously

114

described (33). Briefly, a lipid mixture of dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC), dioleoyl PC (DOPC) and

115

cholesterol was prepared in chloroform with a molar ratio of 5:3:2 (lipids purchased from Avanti). The lipid

116

mixture was applied to Pt-wires in a custom electroformation chamber and solvent was evaporated in a

117

vacuum chamber. The electroformation chamber was filled with sucrose solution (0.1 M) and heated to

118

53°C. An alternating sinusoidal current was applied across the cell unit with 2.5 V, 10 Hz at 53 °C fo r 2

119

hours. GUVs were then tranferred to a microcentrifuge tube and maintained at room temperature, before

120

imaging and analysis as described above for GPMVs. We observed no effect of liquid-liquid phase

121

separation in GUVs or GPMVs on their leakage (Fig. S6).

122 123

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

124 125

Isolated GPMVs are permeable to hydrophilic macromolecules

126 127

GPMVs are widely used models of cellular plasma membranes and as such have been presumed to retain

128

the barrier function of the native PM. This assumption has been reinforced by GPMVs’ superficial

129

resemblance to synthetic GUVs, which generally do not have large hydrophilic pores. Surprisingly, we

130

observed that cell-detached GPMVs exhibited considerable heterogeneity in their permeability to

131

extravesicular solutes in the form of fluorescently-labeled hydrophilic probes. When GPMVs were

132

prepared in the presence of an Alexa647-modified ATP analog (2 kDa) or FITC-modified dextran (3 kDa),

133

a major fraction of isolated vesicles showed accumulation of these probes in the intravesicular space (Fig.

134

1A), a phenomenon hereafter referred to as permeation.

135 136

While fluorescent dextran was generally slightly less concentrated in the lumen of permeable GPMVs

137

compared to the bulk extravesicular solution, fluorescent ATP was often clearly enriched (Fig. 1A inset).

138

We presume this enrichment reflects the interaction with intravesicular proteins. In striking contrast,

139

synthetic giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) prepared by electroformation were almost uniformly

140

impermeable to the same solutes, as exemplified in Fig. 1B and quantified in Fig. 1C. Within any given

141

isolated GPMV population, there was considerable variation in the accumulation of probes inside the

142

vesicle, ranging from impermeable to slightly brighter than the bulk fluorescence of the extravesicular

143

solution (Fig. 1D). Notably, all permeable GPMVs were similarly permeable to both fluorescent solutes,

144

while GPMVs that were impermeable to dextran were also impermeable to fluorescent ATP (Fig. 1D).

145

These observations allowed us to separate the GPMVs in a given preparation into clearly distinct sealed

146 147

and permeable populations (Fig. 1D).

148

The fraction of permeable GPMVs was somewhat variable between repeated preparations (the reasons

149

underlying this variability are discussed below); however, on average, the majority of vesicles were

150

permeable to both fluorescent solutes (Fig. 1E). GPMVs were similarly permeable to FITC-modified

151

dextran in the absence of fluorescent ATP (Fig. S2) revealing that permeation is not driven by the ATP

152

analogue. These observations were not dependent on the chemicals chosen for GPMV production, as

153

GPMVs prepared with N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) were similarly permeable to those prepared with

154

PFA+DTT (Fig. S3)

155 156

Time-lapse imaging revealed that permeation occurred abruptly, and after the formation of an initially

157

sealed cell-attached vesicle. Fig. 2A and Video S1 show the temporal evolution of one such vesicle, which

158

is sealed at an arbitrary starting point (approximately 30 mins after induction of vesiculation), but then

159

rapidly fills with both macromolecular solutes within approximately one minute of the permeation-inducing

160

event (the putative nature of the permeation-inducing event is discussed below). This permeation was not

161

associated with any change in the gross morphology of the vesicle or its membrane, as shown by the lipid

162

dye DiI (Fig. 2; bottom row). The kinetics of filling can be fit to a first-order rate constant, with both solutes

163

reaching the ‘permeability threshold’ (rel. vesicle intensity of 0.7) in <1 min. This rapid accumulation is

164

inconsistent with the permeation of large hydrophilic probes through an intact membrane hydrophobic

165

core, suggesting alternative permeation pathways. To test the mechanisms underlying these surprising

166

observations, we evaluated the size, temperature, time, and mechanical perturbation dependence of

167

GPMV permeability.

168 169

Large solutes permeate GPMVs via stable pores

170 171

To determine whether permeation through the GPMV membrane was occurring via well-defined pores, we

172

tested permeation to fluorescent dextrans of increasing molecular weight. We observed a clear solute size

173

dependence, with larger substrates permeating less efficiently. This dependence is demonstrated by

174

incubating a vesicle preparation with two differently sized dextran molecules labeled with two different

175

fluorophores. As shown in Fig. 3A, some vesicles are completely sealed (dark in both channels), while a

176

large fraction are completely permeable to 3 kDa dextran but not 60 kDa dextran (red only). This

177

dependence of permeation on size of the solute was observed up to ~40 kDa, with decreasing permeation

178

for larger substrates (Fig. 3B). However, the size-dependence was not as sharp as might be expected for

179

very consistent, homogeneous pores. In that case, we would expect a sharp cut-off at a particular

180

molecular weight, with all vesicles being permeable to smaller substrates and completely sealed to larger

181

ones. Instead, we observed a gradual decrease in the fraction of permeable vesicles to larger and larger

182

substrates, suggesting that a distribution of pore sizes exists in any given population of vesicles.

183 184

Finally, the possibility of stable pores was supported by observations that permeable GPMVs retained

185

their permeability well after isolation. GPMVs that were isolated in the presence of FITC-dextran alone

186

were incubated for 30 mins at 37oC, then exposed to fluorescent ATP. After this incubation, vesicles that

187

were permeable to one substrate were also permeable to the other, whereas vesicles that remained

188

impermeable to dextran after 30 mins were also sealed to the second substrate (Fig. 3C). These

189

observations suggest that stable pores (some of which can accommodate substrates up to 40 kDa) are

190

responsible for accumulation of solutes within GPMVs.

191

Cell-attached GPMVs are not permeable during their formation

192 193

To elucidate the conditions that caused stable pores in GPMVs, we first examined whether GPMVs were

194

permeable immediately upon their generation or became permeable due to handling during/after isolation.

195

GPMV formation was imaged from its initiation, allowing observation of vesicles as they began to bud,

196

inflated, then ultimately detached from cells. In these observations, both budding vesicles and almost all

197

detached vesicles remained sealed to the small molecule probes (Fig. 4A), revealing that cell-attached

198

GPMVs are generally not permeable but rather become leaky at some point after their generation or

199

isolation.

200 201

To test the possibility that GPMVs become permeable over time regardless of handling, we observed

202

GPMVs up to 2.5 hrs after isolation. We also compared GPMVs that were isolated from cells to those that

203

were left undisturbed in the original plate in which they formed. Isolated GPMVs were characteristically

204

heterogeneous in their accumulation of the extravesicular probes, with the majority being leaky to both

205

solutes (Fig. 4B and S4A). Notably, the general distribution of permeable vesicles remained consistent

206

throughout the three-hour time course, suggesting that the permeation-inducing event is not time-

207

dependent. In striking contrast, GPMVs that were not isolated from cells, but rather imaged without

208

manipulation in the same plate in which they formed, remained sealed throughout the time course, up to 3

209

h after induction of blebbing (Fig. 4B, S4A). These results suggested that the permeation-inducing event

210

occurs during the process of isolating GPMVs from the cells.

211 212

Neither temperature changes, phase separation, nor shear from pipetting contribute to GPMV

213

permeability

214 215

Given that GPMVs remain sealed until isolation from cells, we hypothesized that either temperature

216

changes or the mechanical stress of pipetting during isolation was responsible for eliciting vesicle

217

permeation. To test the effect of temperature changes, GPMVs were prepared at 37˚C (as usual) then

218

observed either at 37˚C or 23˚C. Both cases showed similar and characteristic distributions of permeable

219

vesicles, while samples that were left undisturbed remained sealed regardless of temperature changes

220

(Fig. 4C, S4B). Similarly, heating of the samples after isolation was not sufficient to “heal” pre-formed

221

pores. Thus, temperature changes occurring during isolation are insufficient to elicit permeation.

222 223

The permeability of GPMVs was also unaffected by their phase separation into Lo and Ld phases. We

224

observed both sealed and “leaky” vesicles in microscopically homogeneous and phase-separated

225

populations, with no notable difference in leakiness between them. GUVs remained sealed to

226

macromolecules regardless of whether they were mixed or phase-separated (Fig S6).

227

228

To test the possibility that the mechanical stress of pipetting causes lipid bilayer disruptions large enough

229

to allow permeation of solutes into the vesicle, GPMVs were isolated using pipette tips of varying bores

230

and pipetted >20 times (Fig 4D, S4C). In all conditions, GPMVs displayed a characteristic distribution of

231

permeable vesicles, suggesting that pipette shear during handling had little effect on GPMV permeability.

232

Additionally, further pipetting after removal from the plate did not affect permeability (Fig S7). We also

233

minimal mechanical stress conditions, by transferring the vesicles one time using 1000 µL pipette tips from

234

which the ends were cut to minimize shear stress on the vesicles. Vesicles isolated in this fashion were

235

similar to those pipetted many times using small bore pipettes (Fig 4D), suggesting that the mechanical

236

perturbations during transferring were not inducing permeation.

237 238

GPMVs become permeable upon mechanical rupture from cells

239

During the course of these investigations, we observed that plates of GPMV-forming cells that were

240

mechanically jostled during preparation contained many fewer cell-attached GPMVs and many more

241

permeable GPMVs. These observations suggested that shear from flow of the bulk solution surrounding

242

GPMVs may be inducing permeability. To test this hypothesis directly, GPMV production was imaged

243

while cells were immobilized on the microscope stage. As previously observed, unperturbed cells

244

produced exclusively sealed GPMVs, most of which remained attached to the cells. Immediately after

245

observation, the same plate of cells was jostled to induce flow of the bulk solution. After this perturbation,

246

the previously sealed population of GPMVs now contained a significant subset of permeable, free-floating

247

vesicles (Fig. 5A).

248 249

Given that extensive pipetting of isolated GPMVs did not induce permeation but bulk fluid flow around

250

blebbing cells did, it is unlikely that shear forces from fluid flow damage intact isolated GPMVs. Rather, it

251

seems more likely that shear flow results in mechanical rupture of GPMVs from cells, and it is this rupture

252

event that results in the loss of bilayer integrity responsible for permeation. To confirm this inference, we

253

compared the permeability of GPMVs produced in a standard “open” dish to a sealed chamber designed

254

to prevent bulk fluid flow around the cells (Fig. 5B). In contrast to the “open” configuration where GPMVs

255

became permeable upon inducing movement of bulk solution, GPMVs produced in the sealed chamber

256

remained uniformly impermeable regardless of mechanical perturbation of the plate (Fig. 5D and S5B).

257

When such sealed chambers were inverted, detached GPMVs settled to the bottom coverslip allowing

258

them to be visualized separately from cells (Fig. 6A). Importantly, these GPMVs were almost exclusively

259

sealed (Fig. 6B), offering an effective method to visualize sealed GPMVs.

260 261

DISCUSSION

262 263

Here, we characterize the surprising observation that GPMVs, a widely used plasma membrane model,

264

are passively permeable to macromolecular solutes. We show that GPMVs are permeable to solutes as

265

large as 40 kDa and that they remain permeable after their isolation, regardless of the specific procedure

266

used to isolate them. Leakiness has been previously reported in other cell blebs (34). We observe a clear

267

solute size-dependence, with the majority of vesicles being permeable to solutes below 10 kDa, and

268

decreasing fractions being permeable to larger solutes up to a maximal cutoff of ~60 kDa. These

269

observations combined suggest stable, somewhat variably sized, hydrophilic pores as the most likely

270

potential mechanism underlying GPMV permeation.

271 272

Such pores are generally not observed in pure lipid model membranes, as confirmed here in GUVs (Fig.

273

1B-C), prompting the question of how they are formed and why they are stable in GPMVs. Our

274

observations suggest a plausible model wherein shear stress induced by bulk fluid flow mechanically

275

ruptures the GPMV away from the cell plasma membrane. This rupture may induce a membrane pore that

276

can be stabilized by amphiphilic proteins in the GPMV lumen or unfolding of GPMV membrane proteins.

277

Consistent with this inference, detachment of vesicles in the absence of mechanical perturbation yields

278

GPMVs that are almost completely sealed (Fig. 5D and Fig. 6).

279 280

How do some vesicles detach from the PM without forming a pore? One possibility involves protein

281

machinery whose specific function is to mediate defect-free fission of membranes with the relevant

282

topology, namely the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) complex (35). We

283

speculate that in some cells undergoing blebbing, ESCRT components assemble at the GPMV neck and

284

catalyze scission, in analogy with the formation of intraluminal vesicles in late endosomes, microvesicles

285

at the PM, or viruses budding from the PM (36). If this machinery is preempted by mechanical rupture,

286

then a stable pore may form. This hypothesis could be tested directly by imaging for the presence of core

287

ESCRT components at the neck of the GPMV bud (35). Alternatively, abrogation of ESCRT machinery

288

should prevent formation of sealed GPMVs entirely.

289 290

These findings are of particular relevance to studies using GPMVs for drug encapsulation (27, 28),

291

therapeutic targeting (26, 27), and studies of membrane permeation (26, 29–32). Another important

292

consideration is whether observations of protein binding to GPMVs may be biased by some

293

probes/interactors leaking into the vesicle lumen. Our suggestion for possible approaches to avoid

294

leakage in GPMVs may be of value therein.

295 296

Author Contributions

297

AS and IL designed the studies and wrote the paper. AS performed almost all experimental work, KRL

298

performed control experiments for revision.

299 300

Acknowledgements

301

All fluorescence microscopy was performed at the Center for Advanced Microscopy, Department of

302

Integrative Biology & Pharmacology at McGovern Medical School, UTHealth. We gratefully acknowledge

303

the members of the Levental lab for extensive discussions and support on this manuscript. Funding for this

304

work was provided by the NIH/National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM114282, GM124072,

305

GM120351, GM134949), the Volkswagen Foundation (grant 93091), and the Human Frontiers Science

306

Program (RGP0059/2019). Authors have no competing interests.

307 308

Figure Legends

309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318

Figure 1. Large solutes permeate GPMVs. (A) Isolated GPMVs exposed to FITC-modified 3 kDa dextran (FITCdextran) and Alexa-Fluor-modified ATP analog (ATP-647) exhibit accumulation of probes in the intravesicular space of some vesicles. (B) In contrast, GUVs are not permeable to the same probes. This effect is quantified in (C) where points represent relative intensities of individual vesicles in a given preparation. A robust population of permeable GPMVs (defined by a relative intensity > 0.7; see Methods) is observed, while almost all GUVs remain sealed. (D) Permeable GPMVs fill with both probes proportionally and in all standard preparations two populations emerge: sealed and permeable vesicles. (E) While the percentage of permeable vesicles varies considerably in repeat preparations, on average around 65% of isolated GPMVs are permeable. Here each data point represents the percentage of permeable vesicles in a given preparation of GPMVs.

319 320 321 322 323 324 325

Figure 2. Large solutes permeate GPMVs rapidly. (A) Time-lapse imaging of GPMVs exposed to hydrophilic probes revealed that vesicles that fill with solutes in approximately one minute. (B) While FITC-dextran signal quickly levels out after this time, ATP-647 signal continues to accumulate, likely through interactions with ATP-binding proteins within vesicles. Dotted lines indicate time to vesicle permeation (reaching a relative vesicle intensity of 0.7) as calculated via one phase exponential association kinetics. Time to filling is 55 s for FITC-dextran and 49 s for ATP-647. Scale bar is 5 ߤ m.

326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334

Figure 3. Large solutes permeate GPMVs via stable pores. When exposed to different molecular weight fluorescent dextrans, GPMV permeation showed a clear size dependence. (A) Vesicles that were permeable to 3 kDa dextran nearly completely excluded 60 kDa dextran. (B) Lower molecular weight dextrans permeated GPMVs with decreasing frequency up to 60 kDa, suggesting existence of pores of heterogeneous sizes. Each data point represents a population of GPMVs from the same preparation incubated with differently sized dextrans. (C) Vesicles that were prepared in the presence of FITC-dextran only were exposed to ATP-647 30 mins after their isolation. Vesicles that were permeable to FITC-dextran at isolation were also permeable to ATP-647 after 30 mins suggesting pores remain stable for extended periods. Scale bars are 10 ߤm.

335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347

Figure 4. GPMVs become permeable upon isolation independent of temperature cycling or pipetting stress. (A) Time-lapse of cells during GPMV production indicate GPMVs are not permeable immediately upon their budding or during their growth. Both blebbing (x) and detached (arrow) vesicles remained impermeable to both fluorescent probes. (B) GPMVs isolated from cells were compared to those that were left undisturbed alongside the cells they formed from over the course of 2.5 hours. While undisturbed GPMVs remained impermeable, the isolated samples had a distribution of permeable and impermeable vesicles that remained consistent throughout time. (C) Keeping o o temperature constant between formation and isolation by isolating GPMVs at 37 C as opposed to 22 C did not affect the permeation induced by isolation, suggesting that temperature changes during GPMV handling were not responsible for permeation. (D) Changing shear strain by pipetting with different pipette tip bores did not affect the population of permeable vesicles suggesting pipetting is not responsible for eliciting permeation. Asterisk indicates pipette tip was cut to increase bore. All results (B-D) repeated in the presence of ATP-647 as demonstrated in the supplement. Scale bar is 10 ߤ m.

348 349 350 351 352 353

Figure 5. GPMVs become permeable during shear-induced detachment from cells. (A) When a plate of cells forming GPMVs is jostled, shear stress from movement of the bulk solution is induced and a previously sealed population of GPMVs becomes permeable. (B) GPMVs forming in this manner (“open” configuration) become permeable due to shear flow, likely by rupture from cells. In contrast, GPMV formation can be induced in a sealed chamber (“chambered” configuration), which eliminates shear forces from movement of the bulk solution. Chambered GPMVs remain sealed despite jostling of the plate. (C) GPMVs forming in the “open” configuration became

354 355 356 357

permeable upon generating shear from movement of the bulk solution. (D) In contrast, GPMVs forming in the chambered configuration remain impermeable regardless of bulk fluid movement. In (C-D) data points represent individual vesicles in a preparation of GPMVs. Scale bar is 10 ߤ m.

358 359 360 361 362

Figure 6. GPMVs formed in shear-protected conditions remain sealed. (A) GPMVs formed in a shear-protected chamber can be separated from cells by inverting the chamber. Because of their density, detached GPMVs sink towards the bottom coverslip allowing them to be visualized in isolation from the cells. (B) Such GPMVs remain sealed. Scale bar is 10 ߤ m.

363 364 365

REFERENCES

366

1.

Baumgart, T., A.T. Hammond, P. Sengupta, S.T. Hess, D.A. Holowka, B.A. Baird, and W.W. Webb.

367

2007. Large-scale fluid/fluid phase separation of proteins and lipids in giant plasma membrane

368

vesicles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104: 3165–3170.

369

2.

Sezgin, E., H.-J. Kaiser, T. Baumgart, P. Schwille, K. Simons, and I. Levental. 2012. Elucidating

370

membrane structure and protein behavior using giant plasma membrane vesicles. Nat. Protoc. 7:

371

1042–1051.

372

3.

373 374

Levental, K.R., and I. Levental. 2015. Giant plasma membrane vesicles: models for understanding membrane organization. Curr. Top. Membr. 75: 25–57.

4.

Sengupta, P., A. Hammond, D. Holowka, and B. Baird. 2008. Structural determinants for partitioning

375

of lipids and proteins between coexisting fluid phases in giant plasma membrane vesicles. Biochim.

376

Biophys. Acta. 1778: 20–32.

377

5.

Kaiser, H.-J., H. -J. Kaiser, D. Lingwood, I. Levental, J.L. Sampaio, L. Kalvodova, L. Rajendran, and

378

K. Simons. 2009. Order of lipid phases in model and plasma membranes. Proceedings of the National

379

Academy of Sciences. 106: 16645–16650.

380

6.

381 382

Veatch, S.L., P. Cicuta, P. Sengupta, A. Honerkamp-Smith, D. Holowka, and B. Baird. 2008. Critical fluctuations in plasma membrane vesicles. ACS Chem. Biol. 3: 287–293.

7.

Moreno-Pescador, G., C.D. Florentsen, H. Østbye, S.L. Sønder, T.L. Boye, E.L. Veje, A.K. Sonne, S.

383

Semsey, J. Nylandsted, R. Daniels, and P.M. Bendix. 2019. Curvature- and Phase-Induced Protein

384

Sorting Quantified in Transfected Cell-Derived Giant Vesicles. ACS Nano. 13: 6689–6701.

385

8.

Schneider, F., D. Waithe, M.P. Clausen, S. Galiani, T. Koller, G. Ozhan, C. Eggeling, and E. Sezgin.

386

2017. Diffusion of lipids and GPI-anchored proteins in actin-free plasma membrane vesicles

387

measured by STED-FCS. Mol. Biol. Cell. 28: 1507–1518.

388

9.

Worch, R., Z. Petrášek, P. Schwille, and T. Weidemann. 2017. Diffusion of Single-Pass

389

Transmembrane Receptors: From the Plasma Membrane into Giant Liposomes. J. Membr. Biol. 250:

390

393–406.

391

10. Lewis, J.D., A.L. Caldara, S.E. Zimmer, S.N. Stahley, A. Seybold, N.L. Strong, A.S. Frangakis, I.

392

Levental, J.K. Wahl 3rd, A.L. Mattheyses, T. Sasaki, K. Nakabayashi, K. Hata, Y. Matsubara, A.

393

Ishida-Yamamoto, M. Amagai, A. Kubo, and A.P. Kowalczyk. 2019. The desmosome is a mesoscale

394

lipid raft-like membrane domain. Mol. Biol. Cell. 30: 1390–1405.

395

11. Wei, X., H. Song, L. Yin, M.G. Rizzo, R. Sidhu, D.F. Covey, D.S. Ory, and C.F. Semenkovich. 2016.

396

Fatty acid synthesis configures the plasma membrane for inflammation in diabetes. Nature. 539: 294–

397

298.

398

12. Garten, M., L.D. Mosgaard, T. Bornschlögl, S. Dieudonné, P. Bassereau, and G.E.S. Toombes. 2017.

399

Whole-GUV patch-clamping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114: 328–333.

400

13. Sedgwick, A., M. Olivia Balmert, and C. D’Souza-Schorey. 2018. The formation of giant plasma

401

membrane vesicles enable new insights into the regulation of cholesterol efflux. Experimental Cell

402

Research. 365: 194–207.

403 404

14. Lin, X., A.A. Gorfe, and I. Levental. 2018. Protein Partitioning into Ordered Membrane Domains: Insights from Simulations. Biophys. J. 114: 1936–1944.

405

15. Diaz-Rohrer, B.B., K.R. Levental, K. Simons, and I. Levental. 2014. Membrane raft association is a

406

determinant of plasma membrane localization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111: 8500–8505.

407

16. Sezgin, E., I. Levental, M. Grzybek, G. Schwarzmann, V. Mueller, A. Honigmann, V.N. Belov, C.

408

Eggeling, U. Coskun, K. Simons, and P. Schwille. 2012. Partitioning, diffusion, and ligand binding of

409

raft lipid analogs in model and cellular plasma membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1818: 1777–

410

1784.

411

17. Lorent, J.H., B. Diaz-Rohrer, X. Lin, K. Spring, A.A. Gorfe, K.R. Levental, and I. Levental. 2017.

412

Structural determinants and functional consequences of protein affinity for membrane rafts. Nature

413

Communications. 8.

414

18. Zhou, Y., K.N. Maxwell, E. Sezgin, M. Lu, H. Liang, J.F. Hancock, E.J. Dial, L.M. Lichtenberger, and I.

415

Levental. 2013. Bile acids modulate signaling by functional perturbation of plasma membrane

416

domains. J. Biol. Chem. 288: 35660–35670.

417 418 419

19. Gray, E., J. Karslake, B.B. Machta, and S.L. Veatch. 2013. Liquid general anesthetics lower critical temperatures in plasma membrane vesicles. Biophys. J. 105: 2751–2759. 20. Gray, E.M., G. Díaz-Vázquez, and S.L. Veatch. 2015. Growth Conditions and Cell Cycle Phase

420

Modulate Phase Transition Temperatures in RBL-2H3 Derived Plasma Membrane Vesicles. PLoS

421

One. 10: e0137741.

422

21. Johnson, S.A., B.M. Stinson, M.S. Go, L.M. Carmona, J.I. Reminick, X. Fang, and T. Baumgart. 2010.

423

Temperature-dependent phase behavior and protein partitioning in giant plasma membrane vesicles.

424

Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1798: 1427–1435.

425

22. Levental, K.R., M.A. Surma, A.D. Skinkle, J.H. Lorent, Y. Zhou, C. Klose, J.T. Chang, J.F. Hancock,

426

and I. Levental. 2017. ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids direct differentiation of the membrane

427

phenotype in mesenchymal stem cells to potentiate osteogenesis. Sci Adv. 3: eaao1193.

428

23. Levental, K.R., J.H. Lorent, X. Lin, A.D. Skinkle, M.A. Surma, E.A. Stockenbojer, A.A. Gorfe, and I.

429

Levental. 2016. Polyunsaturated Lipids Regulate Membrane Domain Stability by Tuning Membrane

430

Order. Biophys. J. 110: 1800–1810.

431

24. Levental, K.R., E. Malmberg, Y.-Y. Fan, R. Chapkin, R. Ernst, and I. Levental. Homeostatic

432

remodeling of mammalian membranes in response to dietary lipids is essential for cellular fitness.

433

25. Yang, S.-T., A.J.B. Kreutzberger, V. Kiessling, B.K. Ganser-Pornillos, J.M. White, and L.K. Tamm.

434

2017. HIV virions sense plasma membrane heterogeneity for cell entry. Sci Adv. 3: e1700338.

435

26. Manni, M.M., J. Sot, and F.M. Goñi. 2015. Interaction of Clostridium perfringens epsilon-toxin with

436

biological and model membranes: A putative protein receptor in cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1848:

437

797–804.

438

27. Patel, J.M., V.F. Vartabedian, E.N. Bozeman, B.E. Caoyonan, S. Srivatsan, C.D. Pack, P. Dey, M.J.

439

D’Souza, L. Yang, and P. Selvaraj. 2016. Plasma membrane vesicles decorated with glycolipid-

440

anchored antigens and adjuvants via protein transfer as an antigen delivery platform for inhibition of

441

tumor growth. Biomaterials. 74: 231–244.

442 443 444

28. Gadok, A.K., D.J. Busch, S. Ferrati, B. Li, H.D.C. Smyth, and J.C. Stachowiak. 2016. Connectosomes for Direct Molecular Delivery to the Cellular Cytoplasm. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138: 12833–12840. 29. Pae, J., P. Säälik, L. Liivamägi, D. Lubenets, P. Arukuusk, Ü. Langel, and M. Pooga. 2014.

445

Translocation of cell-penetrating peptides across the plasma membrane is controlled by cholesterol

446

and microenvironment created by membranous proteins. J. Control. Release. 192: 103–113.

447

30. Säälik, P., A. Niinep, J. Pae, M. Hansen, D. Lubenets, Ü. Langel, and M. Pooga. 2011. Penetration

448

without cells: membrane translocation of cell-penetrating peptides in the model giant plasma

449

membrane vesicles. J. Control. Release. 153: 117–125.

450

31. Dubavik, A., E. Sezgin, V. Lesnyak, N. Gaponik, P. Schwille, and A. Eychmüller. 2012. Penetration of

451 452 453 454 455 456

amphiphilic quantum dots through model and cellular plasma membranes. ACS Nano. 6: 2150–2156. 32. Faust, J.E., P.-Y. Yang, and H.W. Huang. 2017. Action of Antimicrobial Peptides on Bacterial and Lipid Membranes: A Direct Comparison. Biophys. J. 112: 1663–1672. 33. Dimitrov, D.S., and M.I. Angelova. 1988. Lipid swelling and liposome formation mediated by electric fields. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics. 19: 323–336. 34. Sarabipour, S., R.B. Chan, B. Zhou, G. Di Paolo, and K. Hristova. 2015. Analytical characterization of

457

plasma membrane-derived vesicles produced via osmotic and chemical vesiculation. Biochimica et

458

Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 1848: 1591–1598.

459

35. Jimenez, A.J., P. Maiuri, J. Lafaurie-Janvore, S. Divoux, M. Piel, and F. Perez. 2014. ESCRT

460

Machinery Is Required for Plasma Membrane Repair. Science. 343: 1247136–1247136.

461 462 463

36. McDonald, B., and J. Martin-Serrano. 2009. No strings attached: the ESCRT machinery in viral budding and cytokinesis. J. Cell Sci. 122: 2167–2177.

A

FITC-dextran

ATP-647

Merge

Isolated GPMVs in dye solution

DiI

10 𝝁m

5 𝝁m

B

FITC-dextran

Merge

ATP-647

5 𝝁m 5 𝝁m

GUVs in dye solution

DiI

ATP-647 rel. vesicle intensity

rel. vesicle intensity

1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 GUVs GPMVs FITC-dextran ATP-647

1.2

Isolated GPMVs permeable

1.0 FITC-dextran 0.8 ATP-647 0.6 0.4

sealed

0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 100 FITC-dextran 80 vesicle intensity rel.

E % permeable vesicles

D

2.0

esicles

C

100 80 60 40 20 0

GPMV preparations FITC-dextran FITC-dextran ATP-647 ATP-647

DiI

ATP-647

0s

30 s

60 s

150 s

B FITC-dextran ATP-647

1.5 rel. vesicle intensity

FITC-dextran

A

1.0

0.5

0.0 0

50

100 150 time (s)

200

250

60 kDa dextran

B

Merge

10 𝝁m

10 𝝁m

% permeable vesicles

3 kDa dextran

Isolated GPMVs

A

60 40 20 0 1

C

DiI

FITC-dextran

ATP-647

After 30 mins ATP-647 introduced

10 100 dextran size (kDa)

Merge

Time from induction of blebbing (min)

A 20

60

40

GPMVs forming in dye solution

30

0.5

1.0 0.5

1.5

isolated 2.0 undisturbed 1.5

1.0

1.0

2.0

0.5

0.5

D FITC-dextran rel. vesicle intensity

1.0

C

FITC-dextran rel. vesicle intensity

1.5

2.0 isolated undisturbed 1.5

FITC-Dextran rel. vesicle intensity

2.0

FITC-dextran rel. vesicle intensity

FITC-dextran rel. vesicle intensity

B

X 2.0 isolated isolated undisturbed undisturbed 1.5 1.0 0.5

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 *p1000 50 60 90 120 150 180 50 60 90 120p200 150 180 50 60 90 12037150 180 o o 22 time from induction of blebbing (min) time from induction of blebbing (min) time from induction of blebbing (min) o pipette tip bore temperature ( C)

0.0

A

FITC-dextran

ATP-647

Bulk shear induced

Undisturbed

DiI

After inducing bulk shear

B “Open”

FITC-dextran rel. vesicle intensity

1.5

“Open”

D 1.5 FITC-dextran rel. vesicle intensity

C

“Chambered”

1.0 0.5 0.0 before shear

after shear

“Chambered”

1.0 0.5 0.0 before shear

after shear

Merge

A

B DiI

FITC-dextran

ATP-647

Merge