Life Sciences, Vol. 32, pp. 1363-1370 Printed in the U.S.A.
Pergamon Press
CENTRAL NORADRENERGIC-CHOLINERGIC I N T E R A C T I O N IN R E G U L A T I O N OF G A S T R I C A C I D S E C R E T I O N IN RATS Yasunobu
Okuma, Y o s h i t s u g u Osumi, Toshio and M i t s u h i r o Nagata
Department
Ishikawa
of Pharmacology, Kochi M e d i c a l Nankoku, Kochi 781-51, Japan
School,
(Received in final form December 13, 1982) Summary P o s s i b l e roles of n o r a d r e n a l i n e (NA) and a c e t y l c h o l i n e (ACh) w i t h i n the lateral h y p o t h a l a m i c area (LHA) in r e g u l a t i o n of gastric acid s e c r e t i o n were e x a m i n e d in urethane a n e s t h e t i z e d rats. When NA 30 nmoles was given into the LHA, the gastric acid o u t p u t d e c r e a s e d and this i n h i b i t o r y effect of NA was p o t e n t i a t e d in rats p r e t r e a t e d w i t h r e s e r p i n e (2 mg/kg, i.p., 20 hr). E v e n in a dose of 3 nmoles w h i c h was w i t h o u t e f f e c t in n o n - t r e a t e d control animals, there was a r e m a r k a b l e d e c r e a s e in acid output. In these r e s e r p i n i z e d animals, A C h in a dose of 30 nmoles induced a r e m a r k a b l e increase in acid output, while in the controls this A C h - i n d u c e d increase was o b s e r v e d only w i t h a i0 times h i g h e r dose. In the rats not given reserpine, the c h o l i n e r g i c m u s c a r i n i c a g o n i s t b e t h a n e c h o l (i0 nmoles) i n c r e a s e d the gastric acid output while n i c o t i n e (30 nmoles) was w i t h o u t effect. Therefore, in rats, the c e n t r a l n o r a d r e n e r g i c inhibitory m e c h a n i s m s r e l a t e d to r e g u l a t i o n of gastric function m a y be p r e s e n t at the level of LHA as well as at the ala c i n e r e a (area of the dorsal m o t o r nucleus of vagi and the nucleus tractus solitarius). In addition, in the LHA, a c h o l i n e r gic m u s c a r i n i c m e c h a n i s m w h i c h elevates gastric acid s e c r e t i o n m a y be a n t a g o n i z e d by a n o r a d r e n e r g i c inhibitory mechanism. The role of the central nervous s y s t e m in r e g u l a t i o n of gastric f u n c t i o n has been e x t e n s i v e l y e x a m i n e d at the level of the hypothalamus (1-4) and other regions of the brain (5,6). Nevertheless, there remains a p a u c i t y in i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g tentative roles of central n e u r o t r a n s m i t t e r c a n d i d a t e s such as m o n o amines, a c e t y l c h o l i n e (ACh) and GABA, in the r e g u l a t i o n of gastric functions. Osumi et al. r e p o r t e d the e x i s t e n c e of a central nora d r e n e r g i c i n h i b i t o r y m e c h a n i s m in r e g u l a t i o n of gastric functions and s u g g e s t e d that the sites of action were p r o b a b l y the lateral h y p o t h a l a m i c area (LHA) and/or the ala c i n e r e a (7,8). Recently, we noted the e x i s t e n c e of this n o r a d r e n e r g i c i n h i b i t o r y m e c h a n i s m w i t h i n the ala cinerea, of w h i c h n o r a d r e n e r g i c nerve t e r m i n a l s o r i g i n a t e from the locus c o e r u l e u s (9). Thus, we a t t e m p t e d to d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r the i n h i b i t o r y role of n o r a d r e n a l i n e (NA) in r e g u l a t i o n of gastric acid s e c r e t i o n m a y 0024-3205/83/121363-08503.00/0 Copyright (c) 1983 Pergamon Press Ltd.
1364
NA and ACh in Gastric Acid Secretion
Vol. 32, No. 12, 1983
be p r e s e n t at the level of the LHA. The n o r a d r e n e r g i c - c h o l i n e r g i c i n t e r a c t i o n w i t h i n the LHA and the p o s s i b l e role of o t h e r m o n o amines and G A B A in r e g u l a t i o n of g a s t r i c acid s e c r e t i o n w e r e also examined. Materials
and M e t h o d s
M a l e W i s t a r rats w e i g h i n g 220-250 g w e r e m a i n t a i n e d at 22-24 °C u n d e r a c o n s t a n t d a y - n i g h t r h y t h m for 7 to i0 days and g i v e n food ( l a b o l a t o r y chow, CA-l, J a p a n C L E A Co.) and tap w a t e r ad libitum. P r i o r to e a c h e x p e r i m e n t , all food but n o t w a t e r w-as w i t h h e l d for 16 hr. U n d e r u r e t h a n e a n e s t h e s i a (I g/kg, i.p.), the a b d o m e n was o p e n e d by a t r a n s v e r s e i n c i s i o n and a r o u n d - t i p cannula (5 cm long, 0.5 cm o u t e r diameter) c o n n e c t e d to a p o l y e t h y lene tube was i n s e r t e d into the s t o m a c h via an i n c i s i o n into the d u o d e n u m (i cm d i s t a l from the p y l o r i c s p h i n c t e r ) . The tip of the c a n n u l a lay just above the p y l o r i c s p h i n c t e r and was h e l d in p l a c e by two l i g a t u r e s a r o u n d the duodenum, one at the p o i n t of i n c i s i o n and the o t h e r c l o s e to the pylorus, as d e s c r i b e d by M a i n and W h i t t l e (i0). To r e m o v e the solid contents, the s t o m a c h was f l u s h e d w i t h saline, t a k i n g care to a v o i d d i s t e n t i o n . A f t e r rep e a t e d w a s h i n g s , two ml of s o l u t i o n p r e w a r m e d to 38°C was p l a c e d in the s t o m a c h at the b e g i n n i n g of e a c h 15 m i n c o l l e c t i o n period. The c o m p o s i t i o n of this s o l u t i o n was a 1:5 (v/v) m i x t u r e of g l y c ine and m a n n i t o l a d j u s t e d to 300 m o s M and pH 3.5 by a d d i t i o n of 0.i N HCI, a c c o r d i n g to the m e t h o d of B l a i r et al. (ii). Determ i n a t i o n s in 2 c o n s e c u t i v e 1 5 - m i n - c o l l e c t i o n s of g a s t r i c juice w e r e then m a d e to e s t a b l i s h the basal value. In the o t h e r series of e x p e r i m e n t s , the rats had b e e n g i v e n an i n t r a p e r i t o n e a l (i.p.) a d m i n i s t r a t i o n of r e s e r p i n e 2 mg/kg, 20 hr b e f o r e the e x p e r i m e n t . The p u r p o s e of this p r o c e d u r e was to i n v e s t i g a t e the e f f e c t of A C h on g a s t r i c functions, in the a b s e n c e of a n o r a d r e n e r g i c inhibitory m e c h a n i s m . The test s u b s t a n c e to be m i c r o i n j e c t e d w a s a d j u s t e d to 300 m o s M w i t h N a C I solution. A s t a i n l e s s steel m i c r o p i p e t t e (outer d i a m e t e r 0.35 mm) was then i n s e r t e d into the L H A (AP: 5.0, L: 1.5, H: 2.0) f o l l o w i n g the B r a i n A t r a s by K o n l g and K l i p p e l (12), and 1 ~i of test s u b s t a n c e was a d m i n i s t e r e d d u r i n g 60 sec. This m i c r o p i p e t t e also s e r v e d as the anode side of the b i p o l a r electrode. The d i a m e t e r of the o t h e r c a t h o d e side of the b i p o l a r e l e c t r o d e was 0.i mm. For e l e c t r i c a l s t i m u l a t i o n of the r e s t r i c t ed region, into w h i c h the test s u b s t a n c e had b e e n m i c r o i n j e c t e d , b i p h a g i c s q u a r e - w a v e p u l s e s of 0.5 mA, 2 msec, i0 c y c l e s / s e c w e r e a p p l i e d for i0 m i n by m e a n s of a e l e c t r o n i c s t i m u l a t o r (Model 3 2 0 ~ N i h o n K o d e n LTD., Japan). rd
,
A c i d o u t p u t was d e t e r m i n e d by t i t r a t i o n of g a s t r i c samples to pH 7.0 w i t h 0.01 N NaOH, u s i n g a pH meter. At t e r m i n a t i o n of the e x p e r i m e n t , the b r a i n was r e m o v e d and f r o z e n s e c t i o n s cut at 30 ~un w e r e s t a i n e d w i t h c r e s y l v i o l e t for m i c r o s c o p i c study of the sites of m i c r o i n j e c t i o n . The e x p e r i m e n t a l p r o c e d u r e for m i c r o i n j e c t i o n of test s u b s t a n c e into the L H A is r e p r e s e n t e d in Fig. i. N i n e t y to 120 m i n after the test s u b s t a n c e (in case of this rat, N A 30 nmoles) was g i v e n into the LHA, u n i l a t e r a l e l e c t r i c a l stimulation w a s p e r f o r m e d . W h e n i n c r e a s e in the a c i d o u t p u t w i t h electrical s t i m u l a t i o n occurred, and w h e n the tip of the p i p e t t e p l a c e d w i t h i n the L H A was h i s t o l o g i c a l l y confirmed, the r e s u l t s of m i c r o i n j e c t i o n of the test s u b s t a n c e s w e r e s u m m a r i z e d for s t a t i s -
Vol. 32, No. 12, 1983
NA and ACh in Gastric Acid Secretion
tistical calculation. S t a t i s t i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e of the data was Student's t-test for paired comparison.
calculated
1365
using
1
"~15 E uD
\ O" U.I
=.10
Fig.
O.
The e x p e r i m e n t a l p r o c e d u r e for microinjection; effect on gastric acid output. NA 30 nmoles was m i c r o i n j e c t e d into the LHA of rats in a total volume of 1 91. ES: e l e c t r i c a l stimulation given at i0 cycles/sec, 2 msec, 0.5 mA for i0 min.
=1 0
t 0
t i
i
60
i
1
!
i
120 rain Results
M e a n basal gastric acid output o b t a i n e d from rats in the control series was 6.4 ± 0.5 ~ E q / 1 5 min (n=78). In the r e s e r p i n e p r e t r e a t e d animals, this basal level was 17.2 ± 2.5 ; E q / 1 5 min (n=31). Effects of NA m i c r o i n j e c t e d into the LHA on gastric acid output. The a d m i n i s t r a t i o n of saline alone into the LHA did not slgn--iTicantly alter the basal acid output, as shown in Fig. 2. NA 30 nmoles but not 3 nmoles a p p l i e d into the LHA d e c r e a s e d gastric acid output. A c i d output in this NA 30 n m o l e s - t r e a t e d group d e c r e a s e d to the lowest level at the 45-min c o l l e c t i o n (56.5 ± 9.4 % of the basal value, n=6) and then r e t u r n e d toward the basal level. This d e c r e a s e d level was s i g n i f i c a n t l y different, as compared to the r e s p e c t i v e basal values, just before the a p p l i c a t i o n of N A (p < 0.01). In the r e s e r p i n e p r e t r e a t e d animals, NA 3 nmoles a dose w i t h o u t effect in n o n - r e s e r p i n i z e d animals, s i g n i f i c a n t l y d e c r e a s e d gastric acid output. Effect of A C h m i c r o i n j e c t e d into the LHA on gastric acid output. M i c r o i n j e c t i o n of A C h 300 nmoles into the LHA significantly i n c r e a s e d the gastric acid o u t p u t (Fig. 3). Acid output i n c r e a s e d to the h i g h e s t level at the 45-min c o l l e c t i o n p e r i o d (186.8 ± 24.3 % of the basal level, n=10), and r e t u r n e d toward the basal level. In the r e s e r p i n e p r e t r e a t e d animals, the A C h - i n d u c e d increase in acid o u t p u t was potentiated, A C h 30 nmoles a dose w i t h o u t effect in n o n - r e s e r p i n i z e d animals, s i g n i f i c a n t l y increased the gastric acid output.
1366
NA and ACh in Gastric Acid Secretion
Vol. 32, No. 12, 1983
A
C:
v
'10
0
'
30 Fig.
60
min
90
2
E f f e c t of N A g i v e n into the LHA on g a s t r i c acid output. In n o n - r e s e r p i n i z e d rats: O O : s a l i n e (n=6), D D : NA 3 n m o l e s (n=4), ~ : N A 30 nmoles (n=6). In r e s e r p i n i z e d rats: O----O: NA 3 n m o l e s (n=8). ,: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 ( s t a t i s t i c a l l y signif i c a n t as c o m p a r e d to the r e s p e c t i v e b a s a l v a l u e s just b e f o r e the a p p l i c a t i o n of NA.
E f f e c t s of c h o l i n e r g i c agonists, d o p a m i n e , s e r o t o n i n and G A B A m i c r o i n j e c t e d into the L H A on g a s t r i c acid output. A c h o l i n e r g i c m u s c a r i n i c agonist, b e t h a n e c h o l i0 nmoles b u t not 3 n m o l e s g i v e n i n t o the LHA i n d u c e d a r e m a r k a b l e i n c r e a s e in gastric a c i d o u t p u t (Fig. 4). However, the c h o l i n e r g i c n i c o t i n i c agonist, nicotine, did not s i g n i f i c a n t l y a f f e c t g a s t r i c a c i d output, e v e n in a d o s e of 30 nmoles. D o p a m i n e 30 nmoles, s e r o t o n i n 30 n m o l e s and G A B A 300 n m o l e s g i v e n into the L H A h a d no s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t on g a s t r i c acid o u t p u t (Data not shown). Discussion The a d m i n i s t r a t i o n of N A into the L H A d e c r e a s e d g a s t r i c acid output, w h i l e A C h i n c r e a s e d it, a n d the r e s p o n s e s i n d u c e d by N A and A C h w e r e p o t e n t i a t e d in the r e s e r p i n e - p r e t r e a t e d animals. We h a v e a l r e a d y r e p o r t e d that a n o r a d r e n e r g i c i n h i b i t o r y m e c h a n i s m seems to be p r e s e n t w i t h i n the ala cinerea, of w h i c h
Vol. 32, No. 12, 1983
NA and ACh in Gastric Acid Secretion
1367
20
/ •
| ', I ',,I
i/
c
E [0 "r
or iii
=' 10 o ° ~
o
<
t 0
i
d
i
:30 Fig.
60
I
rain 90
3
E f f e c t of A C h g i v e n into the LHA on g a s t r i c acid output. In n o n - r e s e r p i n i z e d rats: O O : A C h 30 n m o l e s (n=7), H : ACh 300 n m o l e s (n=10). In r e s e r p i n i z e d rats: O----O : A C h 30 nmoles (n=6). ,: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 ( s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t as c o m p a r e d to the r e s p e c t i v e basal v a l u e s just b e f o r e the a p p l i c a tion of ACh).
n o r a d r e n e r g i c nerve t e r m i n a l s o r i g i n a t e d f r o m the locus c o e r u l e u s (9). A c c o r d i n g to d a t a o b t a i n e d in h i s t o c h e m i c a l and n e u r o c h e m ical studies, the L H A has a large n u m b e r of NA n e r v e t e r m i n a l s (~, 14) and these n o r a d r e n e r g i c t e r m i n a l s w i t h i n the L H A p r o b a b l y o r i g i n a t e from AI, A 2 cell groups t h r o u g h n o r a d r e n e r g i c v e n t r a l bundles, but not the locus c o e r u l e u s (15-17). In l i g h t of all these evidences, there m a y be a c e n t r a l n o r a d r e n e r g i c i n h i b i t o r y m e c h a n i s m w h i c h r e g u l a t e s g a s t r i c functions, at the level of the L H A as w e l l as the ala cinerea, as we s u g g e s t e d e l s e w h e r e (7).
1368
NA and ACh in Gastric Acid Secretion
20
Vol. 32, No. 12, 1983
////~ .°
,/
\
°°
//
A
E
/
-,.. = 0"
I III I I 0 0
0
I
0
I
L
30
60 Fig.
I
90
1~0 min
4
E f f e c t s of b e t h a n e c h o l and n i c o t i n e on g a s t r i c acid o u t p u t following a d m i n i s t r a t i o n into the LHA. B----g : b e t h a n e c h o l 3 n m o l e s (n=6), D----O : b e t h a n e c h o l i0 n m o l e s (n=5), O O : n i c o t i n e 30 nmoles (n=7). ,: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 ( s t a t i s t i c a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t as c o m p a r e d to the r e s p e c t i v e b a s a l v a l u e s just b e f o r e the a p p l i c a t i o n of b e t h a n e c h o l ) .
As for the c e n t r a l c h o l i n e r g i c r e g u l a t i o n of g a s t r i c functions, the e f f e c t s of A C h and o t h e r c h o l i n e r g i c a g o n i s t s on gastric a c i d s e c r e t i o n have b e e n r e p o r t e d (18-21). Intracerebrov e n t r i c u l a r or i n t r a c a r o t i d i n f u s i o n of A C h i n c r e a s e d g a s t r i c sec r e t i o n (18,19) and p i l o c a r p i n e and m e t h a c h o l i n e e n h a n c e d g a s t r i c s e c r e t i o n w h e n i n j e c t e d into the i n f e r i o r c e r e b e l l a r p e d u n c l e or s u p r a o p t i c n u c l e u s (20,21). However, the e f f e c t on g a s t r i c functions of c h o l i n e r g i c a g o n i s t s a p p l i e d into the L H A w a s not d e t e r mined. The L H A is d e f i n e d as the s o - c a l l e d "feeding center", and e l e c t r i c a l s t i m u l a t i o n of this area in rats e x h i b i t s a s i g n i f i c a n t i n c r e a s e in the v o l u m e of g a s t r i c s e c r e t i o n and acid o u t p u t (3). In the p r e s e n t study, it was c l e a r l y d e m o n s t r a t e d that A C h applied into the LHA r e s u l t e d in an i n c r e a s e in g a s t r i c acid secretion,
Vol. 32, No. 12, 1983
NA and ACh in Gastric Acid Secretion
1369
therefore, it is p r o b a b l y the m u s c a r i n i c r e c e p t o r s w h i c h are activated by ACh, since the same r e s p o n s e was o b t a i n e d w i t h a small dose of the pure m u s c a r i n i c r e c e p t o r agonist, bethanechol. Nicotine was w i t h o u t effect, even in a larger dose than that used in our p r e v i o u s study (22). In this previous study, we r e p o r t e d that n i c o t i n e given into the caudal p o r t i o n of the v e n t r o m e d i a l hypothalamus increases gastric acid s e c r e t i o n (22). Therefore, both c h o l i n e r g i c m u s c a r i n i c receptors w i t h i n the LHA and n i c o t i n i c receptors w i t h i n the caudal p o r t i o n of v e n t r o m e d i a l h y p o t h a l a m u s may be related to the central e x c i t a t o r y mechanism, in r e g u l a t i o n of gastric functions. In r e s e r p i n e p r e t r e a t e d animals, the N A - i n d u c e d d e c r e a s e in acid output was p o t e n t i a t e d p r o b a b l y b e c a u s e of the p o s t s y n a p t i c NA receptors s u p e r s e n s i t i v i t y w i t h i n the LHA. The levels of N A and d o p a m i n e in various brain regions of the r e s e r p i n e - t r e a t e d rats were found to be r e m a r k a b l y lower than in the r e s p e c t i v e controls (9) and the basal gastric acid o u t p u t in these rats was m u c h higher than in the n o n - t r e a t e d controls (9,23). Thus, the inhibitory effect on gastric acid s e c r e t i o n of NA given into the ala cinerea was r e a d i l y m a n i f e s t e d in these N A - s u p e r s e n s i t i v e animals (9). It is i n t e r e s t i n g that the e x c i t a t o r y e f f e c t of A C h was also p o t e n t i a t e d in these r e s e r p i n i z e d animals. A C h in a dose of 30 nmoles (which was w i t h o u t effect in the n o n - r e s e r p i n i z e d rats), induced a r e m a r k a b l e increase in acid output. This p o t e n t i a t i o n cannot be a t t r i b u t e d to a d e c r e a s e d s y m p a t h e t i c o u t f l o w at the level of gastric A u e r b a c h ' s plexus, since the increase in acid output induced by i n t r a h y p o t h a l a m i c a l l y a p p l i e d n i c o t i n e was not p o t e n t i a t e d in the r e s e r p i n i z e d animals (22). Therefore, one has to consider w h e t h e r the effect of ACh was perhaps p o t e n t i a t e d by d y s f u n c t i o n s of the central n o r a d r e n e r g i c i n h i b i t o r y m e c h a n i s m in the r e s e r p i n i z e d animals. Such a functional i n t e r a c t i o n b e t w e e n n o r a d r e n e r g i c and c h o l i n e r g i c neuron systems w i t h i n the brain is well known. P r e t r e a t m e n t w i t h 6 - h y d r o x y d o p a m i n e b l o c k e d the cataleptic effects of pilocarpine, a m u s c a r i n i c c h o l i n e r g i c a g o n i s t and p o t e n t i a t e d the l o c o m o t o r s t i m u l a n t effects induced by scopolamine, a m u s c a r i n i c a n t a g o n i s t (24,25). Methacholine increased h y p o t h a l a m i c blood flow, and this increase was b l o c k e d by chemical s y m p a t h e c t o m y of the hypothalamus, using 6 - h y d r o x y d o p a m i n e (26). S t i m u l a t i o n of the i n t r a c e r e b r a l n o r a d r e n e r g i c p a t h w a y increases h y p o t h a l a m i c blood flow, and this increase was a b o l i s h e d by an i n t r a h y p o t h a l a m i c injection of the m u s c a r i n i c antagonist, atropine and by a n i c o t i n i c antagonist, m e c a m y l a m i n e (27). We t e n t a t i v e l y conclude that the central n o r a d r e n e r g i c i n h i b i t o r y m e c h a n i s m in r e g u l a t i o n of gastric functions is present at the level of the LHA as well as the ala cinerea. Furthermore, the c h o l i n e r g i c m u s c a r i n i c system in the LHA has an e x i t a t o r y action on gastric acid s e c r e t i o n w h i c h is a n t a g o n i z e d by n o r a d r e n ergic i n h i b i t o r y mechanisms. Acknowledgements Thanks are due to M. Ohara for p r e p a r i n g this m a n u s c r i p t . This w o r k was s u p p o r t e d by a G r a n t - i n A i d for S c i e n t i f i c Research, No. 457060 from the M i n i s t r y of Education, Science and Culture, Japan, and by a Grant from the Japan T o b a c c o and Salt public Cor-
1370
NA and ACh in Gastric Acid Secretion
Vol. 32, No. 12, 1983
poration. References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. i0. ii. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.
18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27.
R.W. P O R T E R , H.J. M O V I U S a n d J.D. F R E N C H , S u r g e r y . 1 8 8 7 5 880 (1953). P.T. R I D L E Y a n d F.P. B R O O K S , Am. J. P h y s i o l . 209 3 1 9 - 3 2 3 (1965) . A. M I S H E R a n d F.P. B R O O K S , Am. J. P h y s i o l . 211 4 0 3 - 4 0 6 (1966). G.R. M A S O N a n d T.S. N E L S E N , Am. J. P h y s i o l . 217 1 7 7 1 - 1 7 7 5 (1969) . F . W . L . K E R R a n d R.M. P R E S H A W , J. P h y s i o l . 205 4 0 5 - 4 1 5 (1969). M. K A D E K A R O , C. T I M O - I A R I A a n d M . L . M . V I C E N T I N I , J. P h y s i o l . 299 3 9 7 - 4 0 7 (1980). Y. O S U M I , S. A I B A R A , K. S A K A E and M. F U J I W A R A , L i f e Sci. 20 1 4 0 7 - 1 4 1 6 (1977). ~ . O S U M I , Y. N A G A S A K A , W A N G L.H. FU a n d M. F U J I W A R A , L i f e Sci. 23 2 2 7 5 - 2 2 8 0 (1978). Y. O S U M I , T. I S H I K A W A , Y. O K U M A , Y. N A G A S A K A and M. F U J I W A R A , Eur. J. P h a r m a c o l . 75 2 7 - 3 5 (1981). I.H.M. M A I N a n d B . J . R . W H I T T L E , B--{. J. P h a r m a c o l . 49 5 3 4 542 (1973). E.L. B L A I R , E.R. G R U N D , J.D. REED, D.J. S A N D E R S , G. S A N G E R a n d B. SHAW, J. P h y s i o l . 253 4 9 3 - 5 0 4 (1975). J . F . R . K O N I G a n d R.A. K L I P P E L , T h e R a t B r a i n , W i l l i a m s a n d Wilkins, Baltimore. (1963). K. F U X E , A c t a P h y s i o l . S c a n d . 64 s u p p l . 247 3 6 - 8 5 (1965). D.M. J A C O B O W I T S a n d M. P A L C O V I T S , J. C o m p . N e u r o l . 157 1328 (1974). U. U N G E R S T E D T , A c t a P h y s i o l . S c a n d . 82 s u p p l . 367 1-48 (1971). R.M. K O B A Y A S H I , M. P A L C O V I T S , I.J. K O P I N a n d D.M. J A C O B O W I T S . B r a i n Res. 77 2 6 9 - 2 7 9 (1974). M. P A L C O V I T S , L. Z~BORSZ-KY, A. F E M I N G E R , ~. M E Z E Y , M . I . K . F E K E T E , J.P. H E R M A N , B. K A N Y I C S K A a n d D. S Z A B 6 , B r a i n Res. 191 1 6 1 - 1 7 1 (1980). S.V. A N I C H K O V a n d L.L. G R E C H I S H K I N , Arch. Int. P h a r m a c o d y n . 166 4 1 7 - 4 2 3 (1967). N. E M M E L I N and G.S. K A H L S O N , A c t a P h y s i o l . S c a n d . 8 2 8 9 - 3 0 4 (1944). E.J. Z A W O I S K I , Exp. N e u r o l . 34 3 5 5 - 3 7 1 (1972). E.J. Z A W O I S K I and I. K O P L O V I T S , Exp. N e u r o l . 55 1 2 2 - 1 3 2 (1977). T. I S H I K A W A , Y. O S U M I , M. F U J I W A R A a n d M. N A G A T A , Eur. J. P h a r m a c o l . 80 3 3 1 - 3 3 6 (1982). I. Y A M A G U C H I , J. H I R O I , H. F U K E a n d S. K U M A D A , J. P h a r m a c o l . Exp. Ther. 205 7 1 0 - 7 1 7 (1978). S.T. M A S O N a n d H.C. F I B I G E R , N a t u r e 277 3 9 6 - 3 9 7 (1979). S.T. M A S O N , Eur. J. P h a r m a c o l . 56 1 3 1 - 1 3 7 (1979). K.P. K L U G M A N , G. M I T C H E L L a n d C. R O S E N D O R F F , Br. J. P h a r m a col. 66 2 1 7 - 2 2 1 (1979). K.P. K L U G M A N , G. M I T C H E L L a n d C. R O S E N D O R F F , S t r o k e ii 5 2 2 527 (1980).