Cerebrospinal Fluid Physiology and the Management of Increased Intracranial Pressure

Subject Review Cerebrospinal Fluid Physiology and the Management of Increased Intracranial Pressure

MARK Κ LYONS, M.D., FREDRIC B. MEYER, M.D., Department of Neurologic

Surgery

I n c r e a s e d intracranial p r e s s u r e c a n result i n irreversible ii^jury t o t h e central n e r v o u s s y s t e m . A m o n g t h e m a n y f u n c t i o n s o f t h e c e r e b r o s p i n a l fluid, i t p r o v i d e s p r o t e c t i o n a g a i n s t a c u t e c h a n g e s i n v e n o u s a n d arterial b l o o d p r e s s u r e o r i m p a c t p r e s s u r e . N e v e r t h e l e s s , trauma, tiunors, infections, n e u r o s u r g i c a l p r o c e d u r e s , a n d o t h e r factors c a n c a u s e i n c r e a s e d intracranial p r e s s u r e . B o t h siurgical a n d nonsur­ gical t h e r a p e u t i c m o d a l i t i e s c a n b e u s e d i n t h e m a n a g e m e n t of i n c r e a s e d intracranial p r e s s u r e attributable t o t r a u m a t i c a n d n o n t r a u m a t i c c a u s e s . I n p a t i e n t s w i t h c e r e b r a l injury a n d i n c r e a s e d i n t r a c r a n i a l p r e s s u r e , m o n i t o r i n g o f t h e intracranial p r e s s u r e c a n p r o v i d e a n objective m e a s u r e o f t h e r e s p o n s e t o t h e r a p y a n d t h e p r e s s u r e d y n a m i c s . Intraventricular, i n t r a p a r e n c h y m a l , s u b a r a c h n o i d , a n d e p i d u r a l s i t e s c a n b e u s e d for m o n i t o r i n g , a n d t h e a d v a n t a g e s a n d d i s a d v a n t a g e s of t h e varioiis d e v i c e s available are d i s c u s s e d . With t h e p r o p e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g of t h e p h y s i o l o g i c features of t h e c e r e b r o s p i n a l fluid, t h e p h y s i c i a n c a n apply t h e m a n a g e m e n t prin­ c i p l e s r e v i e w e d h e r e i n t o m i n i m i z e d a m a g e from intracranial hsφerten8ion.

An increase i n intracranial pressure (ICP), also termed intracranial hypertension, c a n result i n irreversible injury to t h e central nervous s y s tem. ICP i s considered normal w h e n it i s less t h a n 10 m m Hg. W h e n ICP increases above 2 0 m m Hg, neuronal injury m a y develop. The major pathophysiologic problems associated w i t h increased ICP are ischemia and herniation. A s ICP approaches t h e level of the systolic blood pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure decreases, and t h e resultant failure of cerebrovascular autoregulation (described i n t h e subsequent paragraph) m a y lead to irreversible ischemic injury. Cerebral perfusion pressure is defined as the difference b e t w e e n m e a n systemic arterial blood pressure and the ICP. Intracranial hyper-

tension m a y also shift brain structures and cause herniation of brain tissue, B e c a u s e t h e skull is a rigid structure, a n increase i n I C P will cause compression of intracranial contents. The intracranial contents c a n be categorized into three compartments: brain parenchyma, vascular tissue, and the cerehrospinal fluid (CSF) of t h e ventricular a n d subarachnoid spaces. A n increase i n a n y one constituent a s a result of trauma, ischemia, space-occupying lesions, or metabolic causes will result i n a n increase i n ICP. A n increase i n cerebral blood volume occurs w i t h either vasodilatation or obstruction of venous outflow. Cerebral blood v e s s e l s dilate i n order to m a i n t a i n normal cerebral blood flow during periods of decline i n cerebral perfusion pressure. Conversely, cerebral v e s s e l s con-

Address reprint requests to Dr. F. B. Meyer, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.

strict w h e n systemic arterial blood pressure (arid t h u s cerebral perfusion pressure) increases;

Mayo Clin Proc 65:684-707, 1990

684

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

hence, blood flow is kept constant. This phe­ nomenon is termed cerebrovascular autoregu­ lation. With brain injury, however, vessel re­ activity is ofl;en affected and autoregulation m a y be impaired. W h e n autoregulation is im­ paired, blood flow corresponds to c h a n g e s in systemic arterial pressure. T h u s , w i t h increases in systemic arterial pressure in response to ele­ vated ICP in combination w i t h impaired or ab­ sent vasoreactivity, cerebral blood volume in­ creases. This situation l e a d s to further increases in ICP and eventually to a decline in cerebral perfusion pressure and resultant ischemic damage. M e a s u r e m e n t of CSF pressure is often u s e d to a s s e s s ICP. Although abnormal production of CSF or obstruction to its flow can cause in­ creased ICP, drainage of CSF can be an immedi­ ate treatment for intracranial hypertension from a variety of causes. Maximizing t h e s e principles ofthe physiologic aspects of CSF facilitates treat­ m e n t of patients w i t h dangerously increased ICP. In an effort to provide a better understand­ ing of t h e s e principles and their importance, herein we review the dynamic physiologic fea­ tures of the CSF, the t r e a t m e n t options for increased ICP, and t h e m e t h o d s of monitoring the ICP. CSF PHYSIOLOGY Anatomy.—^The major historical landmarks in CSF physiology are s u m m a r i z e d in Table 1. The CSF circulates through t h e ventricles and sub­ arachnoid space t h a t surrounds both the brain and the spinal cord. The two lateral ventricles communicate with the third ventricle through the foramina of Monro, which communicates with t h e fourth ventricle by m e a n s of t h e aque­ duct of Sylvius. Through the lateral foramina of Luschka and the foramen of Magendie, the CSF flows into the basal cisterns and subarachnoid space of the spinal cord (Fig. 1). From t h e s e bas­ al cisterns, CSF migrates over t h e convexities toward the cerebral s i n u s e s . S t u d i e s have shown that the interchange of electrolytes b e t w e e n C S F and capillaries is greater in the ventricles t h a n in the cisterns, and the exchange of water is greater in t h e cisterns t h a n in the ventricles.'"''

685

The choroid plexus is derived embryologically from the primary layer of the neural epithelium. The plexus is most readily found in the walls of the lateral ventricles and the roofs of the third and fourth ventricles. The plexus of each lateral ventricle is contiguous with t h a t of t h e third ventricle. The choroid plexus is composed of two layers: e p e n d y m a (the lining epithelium of the ventricle) and pia mater. This outpouching of highly vascularized pia lined with epithelium is called t h e choroidal epithelium. This epithelium is folded into microvilli t h a t produce a brush border, not unlike that s e e n in the intestine. The choroidal epithelium, blood v e s s e l s , and inter­ stitial connective tissue constitute the choroid plexus. Pinocytosis, vesicular transport, and sophisticated organelles h a v e b e e n identified in t h e s e structures. The plexus blood supply is dependent on the choroidal arteries in the lat­ eral ventricles, the posterior cerebral artery in the third ventricle, and usually the posterior inferior cerebellar artery or t h e anterior infe­ rior cerebellar artery in the fourth ventricle. Not unexpectedly, the plexuses in the lateral ven­ tricles are the largest and form most of the CSF_

1,2,4-6

The ependjmia is a single layer with villous projections and cilia on its surface. In 1949, Voetmann'' calculated a surface area of 2 0 0 cm^ with t h e s e projections. Tanycytes are special­ ized ependymal cells without cilia located on the floor of the third ventricle. They have a soma directed toward t h e ventricle and a neck and tail that contact the capillary wall. These cells are thought to be involved in the transport of hypophysiotropic hormones from the hypothalamus to the portal circulation. The drainage of the CSF is considered primar­ ily a function of the arachnoid villi and granula­ tions that project into the dural sinuses. The arachnoid villi are herniations of arachnoid m e m b r a n e into the l u m e n of the s i n u s and are therefore an interface b e t w e e n blood and CSF (Fig. 2). T h e s e villi have also b e e n identified as developing along the spinal nerve roots, where further absorption m a y take place. Granula­ tions are simply large collections of villi. Inter­ estingly, in 1975 Gutierrez and associates* re-

686

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

Table 1.—Historical

L a n d m a r k s i n C e r e b r o s p i n a l F l u i d (CSF) P h y s i o l o g y

Date

Event

400 BC

Hippocrates credited with first tapping the ventricle in hydrocephalus and con­ sidered the fluid a pathologic entity Galen first described the ventricular cavities as filled with a vital spirit Vesalius described content of ventricles as watery instead of gaseous humor Valsalva described CSF as "an ounce of a certain liquid in cutting the cord mem­ brane of a dog, a fluid resembling that seen in articulations" Pacchioni described dura as contractable and the intracranial fluid to be secreted by arachnoid granulations Contugno observed that early anatomists failed to find CSF because decapita­ tion was performed before dissection Magendie first tapped the cistema magna in animals, initiated chemical studies, and established the existence of a communicating foramen between the fourth ventricle and the subarachnoid space Burrows modified the "Monro-Kellie" hypothesis in that the blood volume could change but only with a reciprocal change in the volume of the brain and CSF Key and Retzius first conducted definitive studies on CSF and described CSF flow from the subarachnoid space to pacchionian granulations to cerebral venous sinuses Dandy and Blackfan showed development of hydrocephalus by blocking the aqueduct of Sylvius Weed and Mcffibben described relationship of osmolality versus intracranial pressure and basis for introduction of hyperosmolar agents for treatment of increased intracranial pressure Weed championed the concept that CSF was from the choroid plexus and perivascular space

200 AD 1543 1672 1705 1764 1825 1846 1875 1914 1919 1935

ported hydrocephalus in association with the absence of intracranial villi. CSF Composition.—Quincke is credited with first u s i n g lumhar spinal puncture a s a diagnos­ tic tool in 1891. In his method, a percutaneous needle with stylet and a m a n o m e t e r were used, similar to current techniques. In addition to m e a s u r i n g C S F pressure, the cell count, protein, and glucose were also a s s e s s e d . Since t h e n , m a n y advances h a v e heen m a d e in the analysis of CSF and in the u s e of this method for diagnos­ tic and therapeutic purposes. The C S F flows along blood v e s s e l s in the perivascular subarachnoid space (Fig. 3). Ionic concentrations in the C S F are believed to be governed by hydrostatic forces, osmotic forces, and transport m e c h a n i s m s . N u m e r o u s investi­ gators have determined t h a t secretion and ab­ sorption of C S F occur in the choroid plexus. Sodium, chloride, bicarbonate, calcium, and water are secreted into the CSF, w h e r e a s some amino acids, organic bases, and other compounds are absorbed from the C S F by the choroid plexus.

Sodium is the major osmotically active cation in the CSF, and its concentration parallels that of the plasma. Active transport and osmotic forces are primarily responsible for its distribu­ tion in the CSF. P o t a s s i u m remains relatively constant in the C S F at about two-thirds that of the serum. A proposed m e c h a n i s m for secretion of C S F by the choroid plexus is based on a balanced entry of solute and water at the base with a corresponding m o v e m e n t at the apical side of the cell. Water and other solutes enter intercellular clefts by capillary hydrostatic forces, and specific transport m e c h a n i s m s are respon­ sible for solute m o v e m e n t into and out of the cell (Fig. 4). Calcium homeostasis is tightly controlled, m e a s u r i n g approximately half the serum level, and is independent of the plasma protein level. This process is believed to be a carrier-mediated transport mechanism. Concentrations are un­ affected by intravenous calcium infusions, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, parathyroid hormone, or total parathyroidectomy. Of note.

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

Mayo Clin P r o c , May 1990, Vol 65

Supertor s a o t n a l sinus

Choroid plexus Arachnoid granulation

C o r p u s caHosum

Aqueduct ol Sylvius Cistema magna Fourth ventricle Central canal —

Fig. I. Pattern of circulation of cerebrospinal fluid.

calcium transport is inhibited by ouabain but not by acetazolamide; t h u s , calcium transport m a y be linked to t h e sodium-potassium adenosinetriphosphatase. M a g n e s i u m concentrations are higher in the CSF t h a n in the serum. The CSF concentration fluctuates minimally with varying serum levels. The proposed m e c h a n i s m of m a g n e s i u m move­ m e n t is active transport by t h e choroid plexus and glial cells. The chloride concentration is also higher in the CSF t h a n in the serum. C S F chloride levels tend to parallel serum levels, and the concentra­ tion is higher in cisternal fluid t h a n in the newly formed choroidal fluid. There is a relative ab­ sence of protein (anions) in the CSF. The concen­ tration of protein in the p l a s m a is about 2 6 0 times that in the CSF. The small a m o u n t of protein in the CSF and the D o n n a n effect are in part responsible for the higher concentration of chloride in the CSF t h a n in the serum. The Donnan effect is such t h a t w h e n an ion on one side of a membrane cannot diffuse through the membrane, the distribution of other ions to which the membrane is permeable is predictably af­ fected. The negative charge of protein in the serum favors transport of diffusible anions (that is, chloride) into the CSF. This process becomes

687

readily apparent as a decrease in the CSF chlo­ ride concentration is noted w h e n the protein concentration increases, such a s in pathologic states. CSF chloride concentration decreases to serum levels in patients with meningitis. Its transport is linked to bicarbonate and sodium as an active m e c h a n i s m . Glucose is transported into the CSF by facili­ tated diffusion, in which a molecule combines with a proteolipid mobile carrier. This transport h a s been demonstrated in the plexus, capillar­ ies, synaptosomes, and glial cells. Many studies have investigated the kinetics of serum glucose transport into the CSF in h u m a n s . For example, the m e a n serum glucose level w a s calculated in five normal patients. They were t h e n given 50% dextrose intravenously at 0.75 mg/kg, after which they had a m e a n serum glucose level of 3 0 0 mg/ dl. In t h e s e volunteers, the serum glucose level decreased to the initial m e a n serum control concentration in approximately 2 to 3 hours. The C S F glucose concentration reached a peak in V/'i to 2 hours and returned to control levels in 4 to 6 hours after injection.^ In general, the CSF glucose concentration is approximately 60% of the serum glucose value. Because the CSF concentrations of sodium, chloride, and m a g n e s i u m are the same as or higher t h a n those in serum and the CSF concen­ trations of potassium, calcium, and glucose are lower t h a n those in serum, investigators believe

Arachnoid granulation Superior sagittal sinus /L Subdural space

Dura mater

Arachnoid and trabeculae Subaraclmoid space Pia mater

Falx cerebri

Fig. 2. Relationship of arachnoid granulations and dural sinuses, shown in coronal plane.

688

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

M a y o Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

proposed the term "blood-brain barrier" to de­ scribe this physiologic entity. Morphologically, Arachnoid Subdural space the choroidal epithelium, arachnoid membrane, and capillary endothelial cells have tight junc­ tions. In certain specialized areas in the brain— Subarachnoid the hypothalamus, area postrema, and subforni­ space cal and subcommissural organs—these tight _ Arachnoid junctions are absent. In contrast, ependymal trabeculae cells (except the tanycjd;es of the median emi­ nence) do not have tight junctions but rather gap -Pia mater junctions. Anatomic and pharmacologic factors affect the ability of certain solutes to cross the blood-brain barrier. -•Cerebral cortex The endothelial cell of the brain is different from t h a t of the systemic circulation. In the brain capillary, fenestra, clefts, and pinocjd;otic 'Perivascular space vesicles are noticeably absent. Conversely, the Artery mitochondria, tight junctions, and astroc3d;ic foot processes are increased in number in the brain capillary endothelial cell wall. The brain capil­ lary also h a s specific bidirectional transport Fig. 3. Diagram showing path of cerebrospinal fluid along s y s t e m s for glucose, ions, and amino acids. blood vessels in perivascular subarachnoid space. The choroid plexus h a s specific transport m e c h a n i s m s and is believed to be primarily responsible for the "sink action" of the CSF. As that the C S F is a secretory product t h a t involves polar solutes move from capillary to brain and active transport across the plexus. Simple diffu­ slowly reach s t a t e s of equilibrium, these solutes sion also h a s an important role in the transport t h e n move freely from the brain to the CSF to be removed more rapidly by bulk flow-reabsorpof CO2, lactate, H% and N H / . Regional differences in C S F concentrations of tion, a term that refers to the movement of CSF specific solutes h a v e b e e n observed. Ions tend to and its constituents together. Thus, the system enter the ventricular C S F sooner t h a n t h e cister­ for removal of solutes from the brain by trans­ nal or lumbar CSF. Water appears more rapidly port into the CSF results in rapid transfer to in cisternal fluid, perhaps because of the more venous outflow tracts. extensive surface area of cerebellar folia and The biochemical and physiologic characteris­ cortical gyri. Interestingly, the highest concen­ tics of the solute are also involved in determining tration of albumin is in the lumbar fluid, a permeability. Entry is inversely proportional to finding t h a t m a y s u g g e s t t h a t the endothelial molecular weight. Those compounds bound to barrier to larger molecules m a y be l e s s effective proteins also have a decreased propensity for in the lumbar v e s s e l s t h a n in those of t h e brain. entry into the central nervous system. The more Thus, the m e c h a n i s m s responsible for the lipid soluble the compound, the greater its ease composition of the CSF are primarily active and of entry into the central nervous system. The specific transport, simple diffusion, and carrier- concentration of a compound in the CSF, how­ ever, is not always an accurate guide to its mediated diffusion. Blood-Brain Barrier.—In 1885, Ehrlich concentration in the brain. As an example, demonstrated t h a t aniline dyes injected intrave­ phenytoin, an extremely lipid-soluble compound, nously failed to stain the brain, unlike other is in higher concentration in the brain t h a n in body tissues. Subsequently, Stern and Gautier plasma, but its concentration in the CSF apDura mater

Mayo Clin Proc. May 1990, Vol 65

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

H2O proteln i^p

689

Na*cr other ionsy

Hydrostatic pressure

/ "

Cilia

Clioroidal epithelium

CA *Η!>0=Ή*+Η003

y

^

CI

CSF

Capillary

Fig. 4. Schematic representation of secretion and absorption of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in choroid plexus. Inset shows proposed molecular mechanisms.

proximates t h a t in the nonprotein-bound frac­ tion in the plasma. Polar compounds such a s bicarbonate enter more slowly, a s do watersoluble solutes. Osmotic differences in t h e plasma, brain, and C S F are short-lived because osmolality varies directly with changes in plasma osmolality. The pH of the C S F is generally lower t h a n t h a t of the blood. The ratio of concentration of a solute in the C S F v e r s u s t h a t i n t h e p l a s m a depends on its pK (the dissociation constant t h a t defines the pH at which 50% of t h e solute is in its ionized form) a s well a s the p l a s m a pH.'^ A s discussed, the l e s s ionized the solute the greater its permeability. Clinically, this becomes an important factor with t h e intravenous adminis­ tration of N a H C O g . There is an increase in plasma pH in conjunction with a paradoxic de­ crease in CSF pH that m a y rapidly induce coma. This result can e n s u e because the CO2 produced diffuses m u c h more rapidly across t h e bloodbrain barrier. 2® With the breakdown of this barrier in various pathologic conditions, several changes occur and are reflected in alterations in the normal compo­

sition of CSF. Four major m e c h a n i s m s are believed to be involved in the increased vascular permeability noted in disease states: interendothelial passage across tight junctions, transendothelial flow, vesicular transport, and neovas­ cularization. Rapoport'^ described "osmotic openings" as a m e c h a n i s m w h e n he injected small v o l u m e s of hyperosmotic solutes into the carotid artery and found the horseradish peroxi­ d a s e b e t w e e n t h e endothelial cells and not through t h e m . H e proposed t h a t the tight junc­ tions m a y have widened a s a result of shrinkage of the cells. Penicillin is an example of t h e s e processes at work. A n organic acid w i t h poor lipid solubility and partially bound to albumin, penicillin is transported from the brain to the CSF through the choroid plexus. In patients with meningitis, the barrier is l e s s effective, and the antibiotic more effectively penetrates the CSF.^ A similar concept is involved i n the passage of radiographic iodinated compounds from the blood to contrastenhanced intracranial lesions. CSF Pressure.—Since the development of lumbar manometric pressure m e a s u r e m e n t s of

690

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

the CSF, various factors and variations in w a v e formations have been u s e d to confirm clinical suspicions of pathologic states. In 1927, Fre­ mont-Smith'^ reported the lumbar C S F pres­ sures in 1,033 patients with normal blood pres­ sure a n d no pathologic lesions of the central nervous system. In 94% of t h e s e patients, C S F pressures were between 70 and 180 m m H2O. The generally accepted range for C S F pressure in the lumbar region is 5 to 15 m m H g o r 65 to 195 m m H^O. Variations in C S F pressure are noted with both respiratory effort and blood pressure pulsa­ tions. CSF pressure decreases during normal in­ spiration and increases during expiration. These pulsations are thought to be related to the con­ comitant changes in intracranial venous pres­ sure. Arterial pulsations are also reflected by synchronous increases in C S F pressure. The elevation in CSF pressure with arterial pulsa­ tion s e e m s to follow a progression from the ven­ tricle to the basal cisterns to the lumbar region. ^ A third waveform s e e n in the CSF is the plateau wave.'"* These pathologic waveforms reflect acute increases in ICP t h a t last 5 to 2 0 minutes. Amplitudes of 6 0 0 to 1,300 m m H^O (50 to 100 m m Hg) have been recorded. T h e s e waveforms have been recorded in rapid-eyem o v e m e n t sleep, but t h e y are generally consid­ ered reflective of potential d a m a g e to the central nervous system. The cause of plateau w a v e s m a y be related to a defect in cerebrovascular autoregulation.'^ The characteristics of plateau w a v e s are summarized in Table 2. As defined by the Monro-Kellie hypothesis, with an increase in the volume of the intracra­ nial compartment (brain, blood, and CSF), a concurrent increase m u s t occur in the ICP. Compliance is the volume distensibility of the intracranial cavity, and e l a s t a n c e is the change in pressure as a result of alterations in volume. With increasing ICP, the compliance decreases and the elastance increases. The pressure-vol­ u m e curve m a y not be a strictly exponential phenomenon. Considerable controversy remains in this area of research. A more physiologic pressure-volume relation­ ship is illustrated in Figure 5,'® which depicts

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

Table 2.—Characteristics of Cerebrospinal F l u i d P l a t e a u Waves Occur with advanced stages of intracranial hypertension May occur without any appreciable increase in blood pressure Usually not observed in hydrocephalic infants with an open fontanelle Often preceded by hypercarbia, painful stimuli, activity, or increase in blood pressure Temporarily controlled by ventricular drainage, adminis­ tration of hypertonic solution, hyperventilation Angiograms during spontaneous plateau waves show wider vessels in the arterial phase than interval between waves, but the venous phase is unaffected Reports of increase in cerebral blood volume and a reduction in cerebral blood flow during plateau waves

five distinct zones. Zone 1, which reflects nega­ tive pressure, is essentially flat as the venous s y s t e m expands with loss of CSF volume. Zone 2 is normal steady-state pressure, and the curve is flat. Zone 3 illustrates the compensation for increase in CSF volume by compression of the epidural and intracranial venous system. The slope of this portion increases a s venous com­ pression is maximized. Zone 4 is reached a s the ICP approaches the diastolic blood pressure level and the curve flattens, a pattern that perhaps represents expulsion of blood from the arterial system. W h e n ICP reaches the systolic blood pressure level in zone 5, the slope increases exponentially as the m e c h a n i s m s for compensa­ tion are exhausted. With new techniques and increased knowl­ edge of the physiologic features of the plexus, investigations into compounds that affect pro­ duction h a v e been undertaken. Ouabain, an inhibitor of sodium-potassium adenosinetriphosphatase, effectively decreases production of CSF but only w h e n it directly perfuses the p l e x u s . " Acetazolamide, by inhibiting carbonic anhydrase, decreases production of CSF, but the results are variable and short-lived.'* N o consis­ t e n t results have been found with furosemide or corticosteroids. Several other compounds have been investigated, but no clear-cut consistent compounds have been developed. As CSF is removed by m e a n s of bulk flow through the arachnoid villi and granulations,

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

Systolic BP Diastolic BP

"CSF

1 '

0

Volume

Fig. 5. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure-volume relationship. See text for descriptions of zones 1 through 5. BP = blood pressure; Ρ,,^.^, = cerebrospinal fluid pressure; = normal steady-state pressure. (Modified from Sullivan and Alli­ son.'" By permission of McGraw-Hill.)

one can plot curves t h a t depict t h e transport and pressure-dependent valvelike characteristics of C S F outflow as a function of resistance. The resistance m a y he calculated a s t h e pressure difference b e t w e e n t h e C S F and t h e v e n o u s s y s t e m divided by t h e rate of absorption. Figure 6 depicts t h e relationship b e t w e e n resistance to outflow a n d C S F pressure.'^ N o t e t h a t resting outflow resistance is slightly to t h e left of t h e peak resistance in h u m a n s , which decreases at progressively higher C S F pressures. M a n n and others, w h o h a v e investigated t h i s relation­ ship in m a m m a l s , found a progressive phylogenetic ability of species to transport C S F from t h e ventricles to t h e v e n o u s s y s t e m . In t h e rat, some villi but no observed granulations are present. The ultrastructure and m e c h a n i s m s of response to increased C S F pressure are similar in t h e various species, but apparently in those w i t h a more complex and larger brain, there is a paral­ lel increase in t h e number and size of villi. T h u s , t h e curve for h u m a n s is virtually flat in compari­ son and r e m a i n s m o s t constant. CSF Formation and Absorption.—As dis­ cussed earlier, t h e production of C S F is primar­ ily a function of t h e choroid plexus, with smaller contributions from t h e ependymal lining and perivascular spaces. S o m e investigators claim

691

t h a t more t h a n 50% of the C S F is formed from t h e ependymal w a l l s and perivascular spaces.^" The choroid plexus arterioles m a y exhibit some autoregulatory response. The rate of production in cats s e e m s to r e m a i n stable until the perfu­ sion pressure of the choroid decreases to 50 to 60 m m H g and thereafter declines a s a function of t h e m a g n i t u d e of t h e blood pressure.^' In addi­ tion, nerve terminals have been demonstrated to innervate the plexus arterioles and secretory e p i t h e l i u m . " Sympathetic activity s e e m s to inhibit production of CSF, w h e r e a s parasympa­ thetic activity increases production. Production of C S F s e e m s to be independent of hydrostatic forces and t h e development of hydrocephalus.^^ Absorption of t h e C S F is believed to be due primarily to the arachnoid villi. As mentioned earlier, t h e s e structures are in contact with the dural v e n o u s s i n u s e s . Their function is not totally understood, and w h e t h e r t h e s e struc­ tures are closed m e m b r a n e s , open tubules, or a combination r e m a i n s controversial.'•^•''•^••''•'^•'^ S o m e consider t h e villi a s y s t e m for vacuolar transport by which bulk flow-reabsorption of C S F from t h e subarachnoid space to t h e cerebral v e n o u s s y s t e m occurs.' Tripathi'2 removed 1 ml of CSF and replaced it w i t h 1 ml of thorium dioxide a s a 10-nm colloid

Fig. 6. Cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance versus pres­ sure in various mammalian species. Dots on curves = normal resting outflow resistance. (Modified from Mann and associates.' ^ By permission of the American Neurologi­ cal Association.)

692

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

into the c i s t e m a m a g n a of monkeys. Twenty m i n u t e s later, the brain w a s fixed and sliced. H e opened the superior wall of the dural sinus, and scanning electron micrographs demonstrated w h a t appeared to be large vacuoles in a cell of the arachnoid villus w i t h tracer substance in the subarachnoid space, vacuoles, and sinus. He noted t h a t the junctional complexes of the endo­ thelial cell were intact and found no tracer leak­ ing through the intracellular route. R e s u l t s of t h e s e experiments are suggestive of in vivo bulk flow of CSF. More recent studies in m o n k e y s by Levine and associates'^ h a v e prompted questions about t h e significance of t h e s e vacuoles or pores. They found that more vesicles were present in villi subjected to a negative pressure differential between the superior sagittal s i n u s and the subarachnoid space (pressure greater in the former t h a n in the latter) and presumably under­ going no C S F transport t h a n i n those villi sub­ jected to a positive pressure differential. They also noted t h a t particles larger t h a n the vesicle diameter passed through the villi; t h u s , t h e y questioned t h e importance of t h e s e ultrastruc­ tural entities. As Levine and colleagues^'' pointed out, however, the data of M a n n and co-workers'" indicate t h a t arachnoid villi of different species m a y not be comparable. T h e y also reported t h a t pores were frequently encountered in the experi­ mental setting consistent with increased CSF transport, and pores were not s e e n in those a n i m a l s with no CSF transport. P e r h a p s the development of t h e s e pores is in part responsible for increasing CSF transport in conjunction with increasing the positive pressure differential. During the past 6 0 years, several investiga­ tors have developed methods for m e a s u r i n g rates of production and absorption of CSF.'''-^''-^^ In 1962, Pappenheimer and associates'" developed the technique of open ventriculocistemal perfu­ sion in goats for investigating CSF physiology. Ekstedt'^'" reported on 7 8 3 diagnostic investi­ gations in 705 patients w i t h suspected C S F hydrodynamic problems by simply infusing mock CSF and recording pressure a s it related to flow. H e found a linear relationship b e t w e e n C S F pressure and flow. Sklar and colleagues^^ devel­

Mayo Clin Proc. May 1990, Vol 65

oped a s y s t e m of variable-rate infusion of mock CSF into the lumbar subarachnoid space with u s e of a pump. The CSF pressure w a s con­ currently measured. By m a i n t a i n i n g the CSF pressure constant w i t h the infusion pump, they calculated absorption and formation character­ istics at various CSF pressures. A s a constant CSF pressure, the change in volume over time should be zero; t h u s , the rate of infusion should equal C S F absorption m i n u s formation. In adults, approximately 4 3 0 to 4 5 0 ml of C S F is produced each day. The total volume of t h e CSF is about 140 ml, of which only about 25 ml is in t h e ventricles; therefore, the total CSF volume is replaced approximately every 8 hours. The rate of formation is approximately 0.35 ml/min, and the rate remains unchanged over CSF pressure ranges from 0 to 2 2 0 m m Η^0.6·'<'·'6·ΐ8·2'·22.2''-26·28·29·3ΐ-3'' A s showH in Flgure 7, at a pressure of about 112 m m H2O of CSF, the absorption and production rates are equal, and the absorption rate increases in conjunction with increasing CSF pressure. With t h e s e m e c h a n i s m s in place, the CSF has several functions. First, it provides physical support. W h e n suspended in the CSF, the 1,500g brain w e i g h s 50 g. It also confers a protective effect against acute changes in venous (postural and respiratory) and arterial blood pressure or impact pressure. Moreover, it provides an excre­ tory function because the brain h a s no lymphat­ ic structures.^^ In addition, it is important in intracerebral transport—for example, it is t h e p a t h w a y for diffusion of hypothalamic releas­ ing factors from the cells of origin to the cells in the median eminence. Finally, it is responsible for ionic h o m e o s t a s i s in the central nervous system. MANAGEMENT OF INCREASED ICP As the preceding discussion e m p h a s i z e s , much is known about the physiologic and the patho­ physiologic features of the CSF. The formation and absorption characteristics of the C S F and the physics of the pressure-volume relationships in the cranial vault are of paramount impor­ tance in the t r e a t m e n t of acutely increased ICP. T r a u m a is the primary cause of acute increases

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

693

Those patients with mild head injuries such as contusions (focal) or concussions (diffuse) often do not require prolonged intensive-care treatment. P a t i e n t s with severe head injuries 1.2 can be grossly divided into those with focal and ε those w i t h diffuse injuries. Those patients who 0.8 need e m e r g e n t surgical intervention—that is, those with intracerebral, subdural, or epidural Formation J U0.4 h e m a t o m a s and those w i t h diffuse axonal in­ jury—are the patients who usually require rapid, constant, and extended intensive-care therapy. 0.0 At m a n y institutions, the Glasgow Coma Scale is u s e d for initial a s s e s s m e n t , and the Glasgow 68 100 112 200 Outcome Scale is used for final a s s e s s m e n t (Table Outflow pressure, mm CSF 3). The mortality rate a m o n g patients with severe h e a d injuries—that is, patients who do Fig. 7. Absorption and formation rates of cerebrospinal not open their eyes, speak, or follow commands— fluid (CSF) in relationship to CSF pressure. (Redrawn from is about 4 0 to 50%.^^ Cutler and associates.'" By permission of Oxford Univer­ Nonsurgical. H e a d Position.—Patient sity Press.) position is often dictated by the injury, but the level of the h e a d can usually be adjusted. Typi­ in ICP, although neurosurgical procedures, cally, head-injured patients are positioned with Reye's syndrome, and hepatic transplantation their h e a d s approximately 30 degrees above the can be etiologic factors. An increase i n brain level of the heart to facilitate venous drainage. parenchyma results in increased ICP and is Although some studies have recently questioned manifested by cerebral edema. In vasogenic this practice,^'"^ the goal is maximal venous edema, excess fluid p a s s e s through defective drainage with minimal compromise of cerebral vascular walls into t h e extracellular space. perfusion. The cerebral perfusion pressure is Vasogenic edema occurs in m a n y situations, calculated as the difference b e t w e e n the m e a n including tumor and infection. In cytotoxic arterial pressure and the ICP. edema, fluid accumulates intracellularly as cell The m e c h a n i s m of reduction of cerebral perfu­ metabolism fails. Cytotoxic e d e m a is s e e n in sion pressure is primarily related to a decrease patients with trauma, ischemia, or exposure to in hydrostatic pressure w i t h progressive eleva­ toxic agents. In m a n y of t h e s e clinical situa­ tion of t h e h e a d above the heart. Rosner and tions, however, the cerebral edema is a combina­ Colejr*^ suggested that reduction of ICP with tion of both vasogenic and cytotoxic edema. The elevation of the head is related to increased following discussion will review some of the venous outflow, yet substantial venous displace­ major principles in the treatment of increased m e n t is one o f t h e initial e v e n t s that occur as the ICP. ICP increases (as depicted previously in Figure Several approaches are available for the 5). The patient with severely increased ICP may m a n a g e m e n t of increased ICP; m e t h o d s vary benefit the least from elevation of the head. from institution to institution and from physi­ Similarly, a hydrostatic displacement of CSF cian to physician. Regardless of the individual with elevation of the head may be minimal perspective on t h e most appropriate method of i n a s m u c h a s t h e compliance of the ventricular treatment, a concerted effort t h a t involves the s y s t e m m a y already be maximized. neurosurgeon, emergency room t e a m , anesthe­ Some investigators have suggested that pla­ siologist, intensive-care nurses, and other sub­ t e a u w a v e s m a y signify a decrease in cerebral specialty critical-care personnel is essential. perfusion pressure that m a y lead to irreversible 1.6

694

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

Table 3.—Glasgow S c a l e s U s e d for A s s e s s m e n t of P a t i e n t s With S e v e r e H e a d Injuries Scale Glasgow

Coma

Value Scale*

Eye opening Spontaneous To voice To pain None

4 3 2 1

Verbal response Oriented Confused Inappropriate words Incomprehensible words None Motor response To command Purposeful Withdraws Flexion abnormal Extension None Glasgow

Outcome

5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1

Sca/et

Good recovery Moderate recovery Severely disabled Vegetative Dead

1 2 3 4 5

*Maximal score = 15. tPoor outcome = >2.

damage of t h e central nervous system. "Vasodilatory cascade" refers to decreasing cerebral perfusion pressure a s a s t i m u l u s for vasodilata­ tion. Vasodilatation increases cerebral blood volume a n d causes a n increase in t h e ICP. T h e increased I C P causes a further decline in t h e cerebral perfusion; thus, t h e cascade i s perpet­ uated. If m o s t vasodilatation occurs a t a cere­ bral perfusion pressure of l e s s t h a n 8 0 m m Hg, perhaps t r e a t m e n t of t h e I C P to m a i n t a i n the cerebral perfusion pressure at greater t h a n 80 m m H g would minimize t h e vasodilatory cascade.*^ R e s t r i c t i o n o f Fluids.—^The administration of intravenous fluid in patients with increased ICP can be restricted i n a n a t t e m p t to minimize the degree of vasogenic cerebral edema. T h e sjTidrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hor­ mone and diabetes insipidus, however, are com­ mon in patients with h e a d injuries; t h u s , fluid

intake and output m u s t be strictly monitored in t h e s e patients. H 3 φ e r g I y c e m ί a . — I n patients with head injury, hyperglycemia i s generally a consistent finding.""*^ The osmotically active glucose serves to aggravate cerebral edema. Another reason for the avoidance of hyperglycemia in these pa­ t i e n t s i s t h e concern for brain acidosis. Hyper­ glycemia m a y aggravate acidosis by enhancing anaerobic glycolysis.''*'*® Alternatively, some data s u g g e s t a protective effect of hyperglycemia during cerebral ischemia.'*'' The transport mecha­ n i s m s to remove harmful substances from the brain to t h e C S F for rapid disposal into the venous s y s t e m are critical in this setting. In an investigation of t h e relationship among C S F lactate levels, hyperglycemia, a n d cerebral blood flow in the acute phase after head injury, De Salles and colleagues'*'' found that although hyperglycemia m a y potentiate brain tissue lac­ tic acidosis, a s reflected by higher C S F lactate concentrations, this increase in C S F lactate outlasted t h e acute response to injury. Further­ more, w h e n cerebral blood flow decreased, it was not correlated w i t h higher C S F lactate concen­ trations. They concluded that perhaps CSF lactic acidosis m a y be a manifestation of brain dysfunction at t h e cellular level, regardless of the glucose levels. Nonetheless, hyperglycemia in t h e head-injured patient is controversial, but the avoidance of extreme hyperglycemia in these patients is probably warranted. V e n t i l a t o r y Support.—Hyperventilation h a s long been advocated a s an effective method of immediately lowering ICP.*®'**'*" T h e mecha­ n i s m of action i s m o s t likely related to pHmediated cerebrovascular constriction, which occurs in response to decreases in Paco^. In addition, hypocarbia m a y restore cerebral au­ toregulation,"*" alkalinize CSF,^"-^' and increase perfusion to ischemic brain tissue.^' Complica­ tions related to hyperventilation h a v e been reported in t h e literature, including cerebral hypoxia,^^'^'* "inverse steal" in hyperemic ischemia,^^'^® rebound intracranial hypertension, and myocardial ischemia.^' With intact vasomotor regulation, hypocarbia can minimize injury by reducing ICP. In head-

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

injured patients, normal vasoresponsiveness to hypocarbia m a y no longer exist; t h u s , consider­ able controversy r e m a i n s about the usefulness of hyperventilation in such patients. Prolonged or excessive hyperventilation m a y lead to isch­ e m i a and t i s s u e acidosis.'*® The concept of vasoparalysis associated with head injury sug­ g e s t s that decreasing Paco2 m a y lead to focal ischemia by "shunting" a w a y from responsive vascular beds and increasing vasogenic e d e m a in regions of ischemia.^'^'^®'^* The duration of vasoresponsiveness to hypocarbia and the ef­ fects of acute reductions in Paco2 in patients with traumatic brain injury remain areas of i n t e n s e controversy.''^'*^'^^ Perhaps intermit­ tent, brief hyperventilation m a y be beneficial in the t r e a t m e n t of acute increases in ICP. Despite t h e possible existence of posttraumatic vasopa­ ralysis, hyperventilation r e m a i n s a useful treat­ m e n t modality for increased ICP. In the head-injured patient, difficulty w i t h oxygenation often occurs, and the u s e of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is considered. Physiologically, one m i g h t anticipate a concomi­ t a n t increase in ICP w i t h the addition of P E E P by potentially interfering w i t h venous outflow. In 1985, Cooper and co-workers^^ e x a m i n e d this concern and found t h a t the addition of 10 cm of P E E P resulted i n a statistically signifi­ cant but clinically insignificant increase in ICP. In t h e eight patients w h o s e initial ICP exceeded 20 m m Hg, no change w a s detected in ICP w i t h the addition of P E E P . N o patient h a d a neuro­ logic deterioration w i t h the addition of P E E P . T h e s e investigators concluded t h a t the addition of 10 cm H2O of P E E P in a patient w i t h a severe h e a d injury poses no demonstrable deleterious effect on t h e s t a t u s of ICP. Diuretics.—^The work of Weed and McKibben®° in 1919 w a s fundamental for t h e u s e of hyperosmolal therapy in intracranial hyperten­ sion. Several diuretic a g e n t s have been advo­ cated for the t r e a t m e n t of increased ICP, includ­ ing hypertonic sucrose, albumin, glycerol, urea, and furosemide. The most commonly u s e d agent, however, is mannitol. Wise and Chater®' are credited with first us­ ing mannitol to reduce ICP. As w i t h other

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

695

osmotic a g e n t s , t h e classic concept of action of mannitol is that it induces an osmotic pressure difference b e t w e e n the blood and the brain and thereby causes extraction of water from the cerebral compartment into the intravascular space. Mannitol is excluded from the CSF and brain to a greater degree t h a n other agents. Although this property l e s s e n s its rebound ef­ fect, rebound still occurs w h e n doses exceed urinary excretion capabilities. Rosner and Coley®^ proposed that the development of dehydra­ tion and hemoconcentration from mannitol is in part responsible for the rebound effect noted in some patients and that the maintenance of normovolemia m a y prevent it. Evidence has shown t h a t the effect of mannitol m a y be pro­ longed with the u s e of loop diuretics after the infusion of mannitol.®^ The concept of mannitol producing an osmotic gradient b e t w e e n the blood and the brain that causes water to leave the extracellular space of the brain h a s recently been questioned, at least insofar that this property is primarily respon­ sible for the observed reductions in ICP after administration of mannitol.®^®^ In addition to the osmotic dehydration effects of mannitol, several potential effects on circulation m a y in­ crease vasoconstriction. These factors include increased erythrocyte deformity,®'' increased systemic arterial blood pressure by increasing intravascular volume,*^®^ and hemodilution with a resultant decrease in blood viscosity.®'' These variables m a y all play a role in decreasing ICP a n d y e t m a i n t a i n i n g cerebral oxygenation. A decrease in blood viscosity after the administra­ tion of mannitol h a s been implicated in the observation of increased cerebral blood flow without an increase in ICP in head-injured pa­ tients.®''®^ In addition to the decrease in blood viscosity, delivery of oxygen is increased after administration of mannitol. Low oxygen deliv­ ery potentiates vasodilatation, perhaps by m e a n s of production of adenosine; therefore, any agent t h a t increases delivery of oxygen should help minimize vasodilatation. The increased resis­ tance to flow a s a result of vasoconstriction is counterbalanced by a decrease in resistance attributable to mannitol-induced decreased

696

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

blood viscosity; t h u s , cerebral blood flow re­ m a i n s unchanged. In the absence of intact autoregulation, no vasoconstriction occurs w i t h increased oxygen availability, and cerebral blood flow increases in response to decreased blood viscosity.®® Recent work by Rosner and Coley®' suggested t h a t t h e effects of ICP reduction after adminis­ tration of mannitol m a y be partly dependent on hemodynamic factors. They investigated 16 patients with increased ICP w h o received m a n ­ nitol and found t h a t those w i t h cerebral perfu­ sion pressure of 70 torr or l e s s responded better t h a n those w i t h cerebral perfusion pressure t h a t exceeded 70 torr. B e c a u s e the onset of this action w a s almost immediate, t h e y concluded that the response w a s a hemodynamic effect of the mannitol. Specifically, patients with cere­ bral perfusion pressure of more t h a n 70 torr m a y already have m a x i m a l vasoconstriction and t h u s m a y have little to gain from infusion of mannitol. This conclusion, however, is b a s e d on the as­ sumption t h a t autoregulation is intact and t h a t vasoconstriction is occurring in a normal physi­ ologic manner. Muizelaar and co-workers,®® who examined the effects of infusion of mannitol in a group of patients with severe h e a d injuries, noted that ICP decreased by 27.2% and cerebral blood flow w a s unchanged in those patients with intact cerebrovascular autoregulation, w h e r e a s ICP decreased by 4.7% and the cerebral blood flow increased by 17.9% after infusion of manni­ tol in those patients with defective autoregula­ tion. With intact autoregulation, a normal vaso­ constrictive response occurs.'^®®'®* The dosage of mannitol administered intrave­ nously in the setting of head t r a u m a varies from 0.25 to 1.00 g/kg during a period of 15 to 3 0 minutes. Lower doses are usually given if repeat administration is expected. Miller a n d Leech®" found that the maximal reduction in a pressurevolume response after the infusion of 0.5 g/kg of mannitol occurred at approximately 15 m i n u t e s . Obviously, the dose of mannitol should be ta­ pered to the patient's clinical condition. Close attention m u s t be paid to osmolality, electro­ lytes, blood pressure, and ICP w h e n e v e r manni­ tol is used.

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

The osmolality of the blood, brain, and CSF is essentially the s a m e in normal patients—ap­ proximately 2 9 0 to 3 0 0 mosmol/liter. The physi­ ologic principle on which the effectiveness of hyperosmolal therapy is based is the develop­ m e n t of an osmotic gradient sufficient to drive water out of the brain cell and into the plasma. Insufficient data are available about the range of osmolality achievable with respect to the dose of mannitol and about the existence of a "critical osmotic threshold" to modulate an alteration in intracerebral volume.' The effectiveness of man­ nitol therapy is limited by at least two considera­ tions: (1) substances eventually cross the bloodbrain barrier and thereby disrupt the gradient and (2) osmotically active solutes—idiogenic osmoles—appear within the brain a s an adap­ tive response to increased serum osmolality. For t h e s e reasons, t h e monitoring of serum osmolal­ ity is of critical importance during hyperosmolal therapy. In general, serum osmolality of more t h a n 3 2 0 mosmolAiter should be avoided. The concept of rebound intracranial hyper­ tension is applicable to all hyperosmolal ther­ apy. Although mannitol is excluded from the CSF and brain more t h a n other agents, it can still induce rebound intracranial hypertension. F i s h m a n ' outlined four pathophysiologic mecha­ n i s m s involved in this phenomenon. The first two h a v e b e e n mentioned previously—the de­ velopment of idiogenic osmoles and the progres­ sive crossing of solute from plasma into brain cells. Third, a s the solute reaches equilibrium in the CSF, water diffuses into the CSF and causes an increase in pressure. Any impairment in the m e c h a n i s m s of absorption of CSF induced by the increased ICP can adversely affect the ability of the ventricular s y s t e m to respond to this in­ creased CSF volume. Fourth, a defective bloodbrain barrier m a y allow e a s y passage of hyper­ osmolal agents into the brain and potentially aggravate intracranial hypertension. Hyperosmolal therapy in t h e setting of acutely increased ICP can be effective; however, one m u s t bear in mind that associated problems can occur. Mannitol m u s t be used cautiously, and its limitations m u s t be recognized by those who initiate such therapy.

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

C o r t i c o s t e r o i d s . — T h e effectiveness of glu­ cocorticoids in t h e m a n a g e m e n t of severe head injury remains controversial. The efficacy of corticosteroids h a s been proved in t h e setting of vasogenic e d e m a from brain tumors,''" but serious questions have arisen about their use­ fulness in t h e clinical setting of acute head trauma.^"* '· Membrane stabilization and the suppression of formation of e d e m a are t h e most attractive a r g u m e n t s for their clinical u s e in treating increased ICP. The two m o s t commonly u s e d glucocorticoids are d e x a m e t h a s o n e and methylprednisolone. The recommended dosage varies substantially, but t h e recent trend h a s favored t h e "high-dose" range. High-dose glucocorticoid therapy gener­ ally consists of 15 to 3 0 mg/kg of methylpredni­ solone or 3 to 6 mg/kg of d e x a m e t h a s o n e at various intervals.'''*·'^·^° B e c a u s e t h e s e doses are considerably higher t h a n t h e amount needed to achieve normal glucocorticoid actions, t h e phar­ macologic effects of t h e s e a g e n t s at such doses m a y differ.^" In addition, t h e injured central nervous s y s t e m m a y require t h e s e doses to yield any benefit. The time interval b e t w e e n t h e occurrence of injury to t h e central nervous s y s t e m and t h e initiation of corticosteroid t r e a t m e n t h a s also been a consideration, in light of t h e higher suc­ cess rate of therapy in experimental settings t h a n in clinical settings. J a n e and associates^' reported a significant decrease in mortality in head-injured patients, 16 years of age or younger, who received high-dose methylprednisolone at the scene of t h e injury. In a study by Giannotta and colleagues,''* however, a similar decrease in mortality w a s found in patients younger t h a n 4 0 years of age w h o received high-dose methyl­ prednisolone after arrival at the hospital. These results m a y reflect t h e potential for a better outcome in younger patients and m a y be unre­ lated to t h e i m m e d i a t e initiation of corticoste­ roid therapy. The classic glucocorticoid side effects of con­ cern to t h e physician are immunosuppression, peptic ulceration, wound breakdown, infection, and disruption of glucose and nitrogen metabo­ l i s m . T h e s e problems, however, occur primar­

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

697

ily with prolonged administration of these drugs and are unusual in a setting of short-term highdose t h e r a p y . ' e - ' 9 8 o - s 2 Several clinical investigations have evaluated the effectiveness of glucocorticoids in the treat­ m e n t of h e a d injury. Initial studies by Gobiet*^ and Faupel and co-workers^"* revealed promis­ ing results, w i t h suggested reductions in mortal­ ity. Two factors, however, made t h e s e results l e s s encouraging—an insufficient number of patients to produce a statistically significant result*^ and an increase in t h e number of se­ verely disabled patients.** Subsequently, stud­ ies by Cooper and associates,''^ G u d e m a n and colleagues,'^ Saul and Ducker,''' Pitts and Katkis,'® B r a a k m a n and co-workers,''* Giannotta and associates,''* and Dearden a n d colleagues''^ failed to show t h a t head-injured patients benefit from corticosteroid therapy. Although a de­ crease in mortality h a s been noted in certain subgroups of corticosteroid-treated patients, this reduction in mortality does not result in less morbidity and, in fact, increases the number of patients in t h e severely disabled group.'*'*'''''*'* Therefore, most current studies in which the u s e of glucocorticoids in head-injured patients h a s been a s s e s s e d have reported no demonstra­ ble benefit. Although t h e mortality rate m a y be decreased in t h e s e patients, their functional out­ come is unimproved. B a r b i t u r a t e s . — B a r b i t u r a t e s are often used in a final attempt to control increased ICP in head-injured patients, those with Reye's syn­ drome, or those in w h o m ICP increases after hepatic transplantation. The pharmacologic basis for barbiturate therapy in intracranial hypertension is t h e ability of these drugs to lower ICP and protect against brain ischemia. Barbiturates can protect t h e brain from isch­ emic insult in part by causing vasoconstriction in normal t i s s u e and t h u s s h u n t i n g of blood to ischemic tissue.*® This vasoconstrictor property is one reason for t h e decrease in ICP after administration of barbiturates. Other poten­ tially beneficial properties of barbiturates are suppression of vasogenic edema, decreased metabolic demand for oxygen, reduction of intra­ cellular calcium, free radical scavenging, and

698

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

stabilization of lysosomes.®**°*'^*' The m a i n issue is w h e t h e r t h e s e properties play an impor­ tant role in cerebral protection in the case of increased ICP. Pentobarbital is one of the m o s t common barbiturates u s e d in the setting of increased ICP. High-dose "barbiturate coma" is generally instituted w i t h an intravenous loading dose of 5 to 3 0 mg/kg and maintained as either an hour­ ly bolus or a continuous infusion. Control of ICP and burst suppression on t h e electroen­ cephalogram are the initial goals of therapy, rather t h a n specific drug levels because t h e y are often unreliable indicators of effectiveness or toxicity.*'** In this setting, the most common and critical side effect of barbiturate therapy is hypotension, probably due to peripheral vaso­ dilatation and decreased cardiac contractility. Consequently, meticulous monitoring of arterial blood pressure and the u s e of more invasive cardiac monitoring m a y be indicated w i t h barbi­ turate therapy. It is logical to treat increased ICP with an a g e n t t h a t lowers ICP, decreases cerebral m e ­ tabolism, and reduces brain acidosis. Undoubt­ edly, barbiturates can effect a reduction in the ICP, but one m u s t distinguish b e t w e e n a reduc­ tion in ICP and an improvement in outcome.*'"' Reports by Marshall and associates*" and Rea and Rockswold"' of improved outcome in headinjured patients treated with barbiturates were not confirmed by other studies such a s the one by Ward and colleagues.** The patients in the study by Marshall and co-workers*" were treated only after failure of all other modalities to de­ crease ICP and with much smaller doses of pentobarbital t h a n the randomized prophylactic trial conducted by Ward and associates.** It is generally believed that cerebral ischemia is a major factor t h a t contributes to progressive damage in acute intracranial hypertension. Variable success in the t r e a t m e n t of intracranial hypertension w i t h barbiturates h a s been re­ ported in Reye's syndrome. Marshall and col­ leagues"' reported excellent control and good outcomes, w h e r e a s V e n e s and co-workers"^ and others*® h a d severe problems in controlling ICP in this patient population.

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

In traumatic injury, ischemia m a y be related to increasing ICP and decreasing cerebral per­ fusion pressure, direct vascular injury, cere­ bral herniation, and vascular distortion."* Al­ though barbiturate therapy can reduce ICP, the question is w h e t h e r such therapy h a s been beneficial. In a recent study of patients with traumatic brain injury, Nordstrom and asso­ ciates®* a s s e s s e d cerebral blood flow, vasoreac­ tivity, and oxygen consumption during barbitu­ rate therapy. They found t h a t in patients with preserved cerebral vasoreactivity, barbiturate therapy resulted in "probably beneficial" de­ creases i n ICP, cerebral blood flow, and cerebral metabolism. In those patients with defective vasoreactivity, no such decreases occurred. Although the outcomes were not analyzed sta­ tistically, those with preserved reactivity had better outcomes t h a n those whose reactivity w a s impaired. Similar results have been noted by others.^®'®''*" Although no definitive a n s w e r is available for the question of barbiturate therapy in the set­ t i n g of increased ICP, research suggests that certain patients (that is, those with preserved vasoreactivity) m a y benefit and that the treat­ m e n t should be initiated in t h e s e patients w h e n ICP continues to increase despite maximal use of the other previously discussed modalities. Surgical.—Both traumatic and nontraumatic causes of increasing ICP need to be assessed from a surgical standpoint a s well. In patients with traumatic h e a d injuries, progressive neu­ rologic deterioration can often be due to an expanding intracranial hematoma, and surgical decompression can be an expeditious and lifesav­ i n g procedure. Some patients w i t h intracerebral h e m a t o m a s , depending on their clinical status and the location of the clot, are candidates for surgical decompression. Subdural and epidural h e m a t o m a s are often surgically treatable. Diffi­ culty arises in patients who have neurologic deterioration attributable to increasing ICP without a discrete lesion. This group of patients is treated primarily with nonsurgical modalities to decrease the ICP. Difficulty also arises in determining which patients most likely will ultimately have severely increased ICP. Inves-

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

tigators have reviewed numerous factors in a variety of cUnical settings in an attempt to an­ swer that question. ^^"''' Patients with an initial Glasgow Coma Scale of 6 to 8 and absent or compressed basal cisterns on initial computed tomographic scans of the head are likely to have substantially increased ICP.*'®'^' The initial find­ ings suggestive of the potential for development of severely increased ICP are hypotension (sys­ tolic blood pressure l e s s t h a n 9 0 m m Hg), com­ pressed or absent basal cisterns, and increased ICP within the first 24 hours after injury.^^ In t h e patient with cerebral injury and in­ creased ICP, monitoring of the ICP can be useful in the t r e a t m e n t of t h e patient by enabling the physician to m e a s u r e the response to therapy objectively. Indications for ICP monitoring are variable, but t h e following guidelines have b e e n advocated in the setting of severe h e a d injury: (1) physician's inability to perform and follow serial clinical e x a m i n a t i o n s , (2) absent or com­ pressed basal cisterns on initial computed to­ mographic scans of t h e head, (3) Glasgow Coma Scale l e s s t h a n or equal to 7, (4) hypotension, (5) abnormal posturing, and (6) associated severe pulmonary injury.''95««6-90'92.95-ioi The decision to monitor ICP and to initiate t r e a t m e n t to decrease it n e c e s s i t a t e s considera­ tion about the type of monitor and the location, the accuracy, and the potential complications of monitoring. Interest in monitoring and record­ ing of ICP began in 1866 w h e n Leyden recorded ICP from t h e epidural space. N o t until the work of Lundberg and associates^® in t h e 1960s w a s the true potential of recording of the ICP real­ ized. Harvey Cushing's suggestion that blood pressure would be a useful variable to monitor intraoperatively initially m e t with some criti­ cism, in that it w a s considered an unnecessary exercise w i t h technical difficulties. Similarly, skepticism arose about the monitoring of ICP in the head-injured patient a s well a s in other situations of increased ICP. Lundberg and col­ l e a g u e s illustrated t h e specific and recognizable patterns of dangerous ICP. As discussed previ­ ously, plateau w a v e s represent episodic increas­ e s in the ICP of 50 to 100 m m H g and signal potentially irreversible brain damage. The major

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

699

rationale for monitoring of ICP is to detect the development of plateau waves. N u m e r o u s reports in the literature describe individual series of ICP monitoring; however, very few series comprehensively report their techniques and results. Before 1960, ventricu­ lostomy w a s the most common method used. Although specific data on infections were gener­ ally not available, the "rule of thumb" w a s to monitor for only about 72 hours. 102.103 rpj^g major sites of m e a s u r e m e n t are illustrated in Figure 8. M o n i t o r i n g S y s t e m s . — D u r i n g the past century, monitoring of ICP h a s benefited from developments in engineering capabilities. The "gold standard" for monitoring of ICP h a s been the intraventricular catheter connected to a m a n o m e t e r by m e a n s of a fluid-filled tube. The intraventricular catheter is placed after sterile preparation of the scalp over the frontal lobe. A burr hole or twist drill hole is made 2 to 3 cm anterior to the coronal suture and 3 cm off midline. The dura is pierced, and the catheter is inserted into the lateral ventricle with the tip near the foramen of Monro. The subarachnoid screw or "bolt" is a device t h a t w a s developed to m e a s u r e the ICP indi­ rectly, as transmitted from the subarachnoid space to the device. Pressure recorded over the convexities is thought to represent the ICP.'"'**"^ The screw is essentially a hollow tube bolted to

Intraventrtcular Epidural

' Subarachnoid

Intraparenchymal

Parenchyma

SubarachtxjM space

Fig. 8. Schematic representation of sites for monitoring of intracranial pressure.

700

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

the calvaria. P l a c e m e n t is either subarachnoid or subdural. Usually, t h e device is connected to a fluid-filled s y s t e m w i t h a pressure transducer external to t h e device.'°^'°® This device is ofi;en irrigated with saline every 6 hours to m a i n t a i n patency. Its a d v a n t a g e s reportedly include e a s e of insertion a n d lower risks of infection a n d brain injury. Major disadvantages arise in t h e inability to drain CSF for therapeutic purposes and its questionable accuracy. Although several such devices are currently available, t h e t w o most common are t h e Richmond screw a n d t h e Leeds device. T h e Richmond screw i s a singleaperture monitor, w h e r e a s t h e Leeds device i s a m u l t i l u m e n system. Difficulty with occlusion of the aperture by herniation of brain t i s s u e led in part to t h e development of t h e m u l t i l u m e n device. The epidural space is a n attractive alterna­ tive for t h e location of a monitoring system. Theoretically, t h e epidural pulsation should be an indirect m e a s u r e of ICP. P l a c e m e n t of t h e device i n the epidural space obviates the need to violate t h e dura a n d therefore decreases t h e risks of infection a n d brain injury. T h e Ladd fiberoptic system, Gaeltec strain gauge. Philips strain g a u g e transducer, a n d CardioSearch pneumatic s y s t e m s all have been advocated a s safe and accurate for monitoring iCP.'o^"''"** The Ladd s y s t e m works by transmission of light through one optical fiber a n d reflection of light by a mirror back through two other fibers. These t w o "afferent" fibers receive t h e s a m e amount of light w h e n t h e mirror is i n a central position. W h e n t h e position of t h e mirror is deflected by transmitted epidural pressure, t h e amount of light received by t h e t w o fibers is analyzed. On t h e basis of t h e results of this analysis, air pressure is activated within t h e monitor to centralize t h e mirror. The air pres­ sure needed to centralize the mirror reflects t h e epidural pressure.""'"* The Gaeltec s y s t e m h a s a pressure transducer in i t s tip that allows direct m e a s u r e m e n t of epidural pressure. T h e Philips epidural pres­ sure transducer is similar in i t s physics to t h e Gaeltec s y s t e m a n d in i t s design to t h e sub­ arachnoid device.""

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

The CardioSearch pneumatic system w a s developed to improve on the response time of the fiberoptic system."''"* The sensor membrane is deflected by t h e transmitted epidural pressure, which in turn increases t h e pressure in t h e plenum. The plenum is the chamber, juxtaposed to t h e sensor membrane, that h o u s e s t h e inlet and e x h a u s t s y s t e m s . Air enters t h e plenum through t h e inlet s y s t e m a n d exits through t h e e x h a u s t system. The inlet air pressure needed to overcome t h e pressure in t h e plenum and rees­ tablish e x h a u s t flow represents t h e ICP.'^ The processing unit records pressure each second and averages four v a l u e s to produce 15 digital readings per minute. With t h e CardioSearch monitor, a s i n most monitoring systems, t h e mechanics of the sensor are excellent; however, the in vivo accuracy of the s y s t e m is the relevant issue in a s s e s s i n g i t s clinical usefulness. The fiberoptic s y s t e m developed by Camino Laboratories can be used intraventricularly, intraparenchymally, a n d epidurally.'""'" The 4-F catheter h a s a fiberoptic transducer in the tip. A mirror diaphragm moves in response to changes in pressure, which are transmitted through optic fibers to display a digital pressure reading. The s y s t e m m a y be interfaced with a n external monitor for a s s e s s m e n t of waveform and cerebral perfusion pressure. The intraven­ tricular transducer is attached to t h e skull by m e a n s of a housing unit, similar to t h e bolt device. The transducer-tipped catheter fits in­ side t h e ventricular catheter; therefore, drain­ age of C S F a n d constant ICP recordings are possible.'""-'" A relatively n e w capability for monitoring the ICP is by intraparenchymal pressure recording. The Camino fiberoptic s y s t e m a n d t h e Hon­ eywell microtransducer are two currently avail­ able s y s t e m s . The advantage with this approach is the ability to monitor, especially in the setting of severe closed head injury, w h e n ventricular access is difficult. Usually, the probe is inserted 2 to 3 cm into the white matter; thus, t h e risk of severe brain injury m a y be no greater t h a n with the intraventricular catheter. A disadvantage is the inability to secure CSF drainage. The initial problem of catheter breakage h a s been reduced

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

in the clinical setting w i t h design modifications and increased familiarity with the system. The major a d v a n t a g e s and d i s a d v a n t a g e s of ICP monitoring based on specific location are s u m ­ marized in Table 4. Accuracy.—^The major reason for monitor­ ing of ICP is to enable t h e physician to obtain a reliable m e a s u r e of ICP dynamics. Most studies evaluating ICP monitors consider t h e intraven­ tricular pressure a s the control value. In 1973, Vries and co-workers"*® reported the u s e of t h e subarachnoid bolt in 56 patients (33 with closed head injury), with "good recordings" a s judged by blood pressure and respiratory fluctuations. They noted occasional d a m p i n g of t h e tracing, which w a s attributed to a slow leak. The fluid-filled s y s t e m s , which include the intraventricular catheter, are all prone to inaccuracy because of m i n i l e a k s in t h e s y s t e m . Several investigators have noted inaccurate m e a s u r e m e n t s with u s e o f t h e subarachnoid bolts.""''"'^"^-"^ Miller and associates"* reported the u s e of a subarachnoid bolt in a patient w i t h Reye's syndrome and a patient w i t h a n epidural h e m a t o m a . Despite both patients h a v i n g clinical and computed tomographic evidence of increasing ICP, the bolts provided readings of low pressure with good "waveform." In another study by North and

Reilly,"^ the intraventricular monitor (pediatric feeding tube), the subdural catheter (pediatric feeding tube), and the subarachnoid Richmond screw were concurrently compared in patients w i t h h e a d trauma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and hydrocephalus. T h e s e investigators found t h a t the Richmond screw had a significantly higher rate of damping—and t h u s inaccuracy— t h a n t h e other devices. (The rates were 16% for the Richmond screw, 2.7% for the subdural cathe­ ter, and 2.5% for the intraventricular catheter.) Alternatively, Winn and colleagues"*^ reported good success with t h e subarachnoid bolt in 147 patients monitored because of trauma, tumors, or vascular events. Their control method, how­ ever, w a s occasional lumbar punctures in some patients, and only 11 patients had ventricular catheters in place simultaneously. The group from Leeds, England, evaluated the accuracy of their subarachnoid device in 18 patients who were monitored because of closed head injury. With a m e a n duration of 5.7 days of monitoring, infusion t e s t i n g revealed that less t h a n 50% of t h e m e a s u r e m e n t s were "normal." Although the majority of the erroneous record­ ings were "correctable," the accuracy of the device in this setting is questionable. In a report by Mendelow and a s s o c i a t e s , 1 0 patients with

Table 4.-—Monitoring of Intracranial P r e s s u r e * Location

Advantages

Disadvantages

Intraventricular

"Gold standard" Reliability CSF drainage Waveform

Increased risk of infection Potential for brain injury Placement Fluid-filled system Transducer repositioning

Intraparenchymal

Ease of placement Non fluid-filled

Potential for brain injury Increased risk of infection No CSF drainage Catheter breakage

Subarachnoid

Ease of placement No brain penetration Less risk of infection

Questionable accuracy No CSF drainage Fluid-filled system Brain tissue obstruction

Epidural

Dura remains intact Non fluid-filled Ease of insertion

Questionable accuracy No CSF drainage "Wedge effect"

*CSF = cerebrospinal fluid.

701

702

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

closed head injury were monitored with a Richmond screw and an intraventricular cathe­ ter. In 4 1 % of the readings, t h e bolt and catheter results were within 10 m m Hg. N o n e t h e l e s s , in 46% of the readings, the bolt underread the catheter by more t h a n 10 m m Hg. This discrep­ ancy w a s e v e n more apparent w h e n the ICP w a s greater t h a n 20 m m H g and w h e n peak pres­ sures occurred. They also compared t h e Leeds device and an intraventricular catheter in 10 patients w i t h closed h e a d injury. T h e y noted a 58% correlation, with 27% of the readings from the Leeds device lower t h a n the catheter value. The results with t h e Leeds device were similar to those with the Richmond screw. The most common reasons for t h e malfunction and inaccu­ racy of the subarachnoid bolt s e e m to be minileaks in the s y s t e m and herniation of the brain into the device. Frequent injections of saline are often needed for malfunctioning subarachnoid bolts. This practice m a y increase the risk of infection. In comparisons of intraparenchymal cathe­ ters and intraventricular catheters, relatively good correlations have b e e n found.'""® The errors tend to be a higher reading with the intraparenchymal t h a n with the intraventricu­ lar catheter. Some investigators have u s e d the subarach­ noid devices in the epidural space.'°*·"^ The e a s e of insertion of the subarachnoid bolt, combined with the desire to avoid violating the dura, led to t h e development of t h e epidural monitors. The advancing technology and miniaturization re­ sulted in the development of the Ladd fiberoptic monitor. L e v i n r e p o r t e d that this monitor provided accurate data w h e n u s e d in 140 pa­ tients, half of w h o m had s u s t a i n e d trauma. The accuracy of the monitor w a s a s s e s s e d by normal functioning of the sensor after removal from the patient. Except for a few isolated examples, no controls were included in the study. The CardioSearch s y s t e m h a s an excellent response time a n d in vitro accuracy.'" As with all epidural monitors, however, the question of in vivo accuracy and t h e "wedge effect" of brain tissue remain important considerations. Re­ cently, Powell and Crockard"** evaluated the

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

CardioSearch s y s t e m in 19 patients with chroni­ cally increased ICP and 12 patients with acutely increased ICP. Concurrent intraventricular catheter and CardioSearch sensor recordings of ICP were compared. The chronically increased ICP m e a s u r e m e n t s corresponded with use ofthe two devices; however, in the patients with acutely increased ICP, no relationship w a s found be­ t w e e n the epidural pressure and the intraven­ tricular pressure. The time needed for the differ­ ence between the epidural sensor readings and the intraventricular v a l u e s to be greater t h a n 8 m m H g w a s 0 to 9 hours. This difference ranged for -1-25 m m H g to - 3 0 m m H g in the seven patients with severe closed head injuries. These results s e e m to indicate t h a t the sensor is accu­ rate but t h a t the epidural space m a y not be an ideal location for the monitor in the head-injured patient. C o m p l i c a t i o n s . — ^ A s s e s s m e n t of the true occurrence of complications associated with in­ tracranial monitoring s y s t e m s is difficult. Many studies do not report their complications, and of those that do, the data are often incomplete. The major complications are malfunction, hemor­ rhage, and infection. Malfunction of the monitoring device is most commonly attributable to inherent flaws in the s y s t e m or to herniation of brain tissue. North and Reilly's review'"^ of 340 patients (378 moni­ tors) during a 10-year period found that the premature cessation rate as a result of a damped tracing or catheter dislodgment w a s 5.5% for subdural catheters, 7.1% for intraventricular catheters, and 20.3% for the Richmond screw. Winn and a s s o c i a t e s r e p o r t e d an 8% failure rate of subarachnoid screws attributable to place­ m e n t or brain herniation. The failure rate with epidural monitors is generally about 10%."*·"^ Hemorrhage is a risk with any "blind" intra­ cranial procedure. N a r a y a n and associates"" reported three intraparenchymal hemorrhages (one of which necessitated surgical evacuation) in 188 insertions of intraventricular catheters (1.6%). North and Reilly' '•'^ reported two hemor­ rhages in 199 placements of intraventricular catheters. Subarachnoid screws can result in subdural or epidural h e m a t o m a s . Published

Mayo Clin P r o c , May 1990, Vol 65

studies report complications t h a t range from 0 to 1%. 1 0 1 . ' 0 6 , 1 1 5 Approximately 1% of epidural monitors are also reported to be associated w i t h epidural hematomas.'"*"" The third major concern with a n y monitoring s y s t e m is t h e risk of infection. Difficulty in predicting t h e relative risk of infection arises from t h e fact t h a t m a n y s t u d i e s do n o t (1) report infections, (2) offer a definition of "monitor-asso­ ciated" infection, (3) c o m m e n t on t h e u s e of anti­ biotics or corticosteroids, or (4) u s e a wide range of monitoring times. In t h e interest of uni­ formity, infections proved by positive cultures and clearly related to t h e device are considered "monitor-related" episodes. Intraventricular catheter-related infections range from 0 to 2 2 % . 5 8 , i o 2 . i o 3 , i o 5 , i i o , i i 5 , i 2 o - i 2 6 Subarachuoid screws h a v e a s o m e w h a t lower risk of infection—^be­ t w e e n 0 and 7 . 5 % . i o i , i o 2 , i o 4 , i o 5 . n 5 , i 2 o , i 2 3 T h e s e in­ fections are primarily meningitis, osteomyelitis, and superficial wound infections. T h e rate of infection with u s e of epidural monitors is from 0 to 1%.'"«·"" The organisms isolated from t h e s e infections are s o m e w h a t surprising in t h a t about half are gram-positive bacteria (most commonly. Staphy­ lococcus epidermidis or S. aureus), w h e r e a s t h e other half are gram-negative bacilli (including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, and //aemop^iZMs).'«3-"e''2"'''-'2'^''26

The prophylactic u s e of antibiotics h a s b e e n reviewed by several investigators, some of w h o m indicate t h a t such m e a s u r e s do not influence t h e rate of infection'"""""' and others of w h o m have shown prophylaxis to be useful. "''•"® Some investigators h a v e found a n associated increased risk of infection w h e n t h e s y s t e m is flushed with bacitracin."" This observation m a y actually indicate a n increased risk with manipulation of the monitoring system. T h e u s e of corticoste­ roids h a s also b e e n implicated as a risk factor for infection.'"""" A n almost universal observation i s that t h e longer the duration of monitoring, t h e greater the possibility of infection. T h e infection rate for virtually any s y s t e m is l e s s t h a n 1% if t h e monitor is in place for fewer t h a n 4 days, and after 5 days the rates increase. Minimizing t h e manipula­

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

703

tion of the s y s t e m is of primary importance. The monitoring s y s t e m should be inserted under sterile conditions i n t h e operating room when­ ever possible. In order to ensure t h e most accurate recording of ICP, especially in patients w h o have sus­ tained head trauma, t h e intraventricular moni­ tor is t h e most reliable. Although probably associated with a greater propensity for infec­ tion and perhaps brain injury, this device pro­ vides t h e most accurate data a n d therapeutic capabilities. With t h e foregoing factors in mind, the intraventricular catheter should be changed after 4 or 5 days to minimize t h e possibility of infection. CONCLUSION The brain, surrounded by a rigid cranial vault, enveloped by t h e m e n i n g e s , a n d bathed by the CSF, i s naturally protected from noxious exter­ nal events. Ironically, t h e s e protective struc­ tures can adversely affect t h e brain during its response to injury. T h e brain is limited in its response w h e n t h e delicate homeostatic envi­ ronment is disrupted by injury. E d e m a (vaso­ genic and cytotoxic) is the m a i n response of the central nervous s y s t e m to injury. The brain swells, a n d because it i s constrained by the protective skull, t h e ICP increases. The pa­ thophysiologic response of t h e C S F serves to slow t h e increase in ICP, but it is often insuffi­ cient to avoid damage to the central nervous system. With t h e proper understanding of t h e physiologic aspects of the CSF, the physician can apply t h e m a n a g e m e n t principles reviewed herein to minimize damage from intracranial hypertension. Monitoring of the ICP provides objective data about success or failure of thera­ peutic intervention. Considering t h e group of patients in which t h e s e principles of care are instituted, one can easily develop a feeling of overwhelming dismay. Individually, however, m a n y of t h e s e patients can benefit from this intensive care. With appre­ ciation of the limitations of therapeutic modali­ t i e s a n d the establishment of realistic goals, t h e physician can treat t h e patient with increased ICP based on physiologic principles and clinical

704

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

j u d g m e n t in a n a t t e m p t to preserve t h e most critical h u m a n structure—the brain. ACKNOWLEDGMENT We t h a n k Mary M. Soper for her secretarial assistance with the preparation of t h e submitted manuscript.

Mayo Clin P r o c , May 1990, Vol 65

17.

18.

19. REFERENCES 1. Davson H, Welch K, Segal MB: Physiology and Pathophysiology of the Cerebrospinal Fluid. Ed­ inburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1987 2. Fishman RA: Cerebrospinal Fluid in Diseases of the Nervous System. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Com­ pany, 1980 3. Fremont-Smith F: The nature of the cerebrospinal fluid. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 17:317-331, 1927 4. Carpenter MB: Core Text of Neuroanatomy. Second edition. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1978 5. Rowland LP: Blood-brain barrier, cerebrospinal fluid, brain edema, and hydrocephalus. In Principles of Neural Science. Edited by ER Kandel, JH Schwartz. New York, Elsevier/North-Holland, 1981, pp 651659 6. Wood JH (ed): Neurobiology of Cerebrospinal Fluid 2. New York, Plenum Press, 1983 7. Voetmann E: On the structure and surface area of the human choroid plexuses: a quantitative ana­ tomical study. Acta Anat (Basel) 8 (Suppl 10):1-116, 1949 8. Gutierrez Y, Friede RL, Kaliney WJ: Agenesis of arachnoid granulations and its relationship to com­ municating hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 43:553558, 1975 9. Butler AB: CSF transport mechanisms in the arach­ noid villus. Surg Forum 28:475-476, 1977 10. Cutler RWP, Page L, Galicich J, Watters GV: Forma­ tion and absorption of cerebrospinal fluid in man. Brain 91:707-720, 1968 11. LindvallM, EdvinssonL,OwmanC: Histochemical, ultrastructural, and functional evidence for a neuro­ genic control of CSF production from the choroid plexus. Adv Neurol 20:111-120, 1978 12. Tripathi R: Tracing the bulk outflow route of cere­ brospinal fluid by transmission and scanning elec­ tron microscopy. Brain Res 80:503-506, 1974 13. Rapoport SI: Blood-Brain Barrier in Physiology and Medicine. New York, Raven Press, 1976, pp 43-86 14. Rosner MJ, Becker DP: Origin and evolution of plateau waves: experimental observations and a theoretical model. J Neurosurg 60:312-324, 1984 15. Risberg J, Lundberg N, Ingvar DH: Regional cere­ bral blood volume during acute transient rises ofthe intracranial pressure (plateau waves). J Neurosurg 31:303-310, 1969 16. Sullivan HG, Allison JD: Physiology of cerebrospinal fluid, /ra Neurosurgery. Vol 3. Edited by RH Wilkins,

20. 21. 22.

23. 24.

25. 26.

27. 28.

29.

30. 31.

32.

SS Rengachary. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1985, pp 2125-2135 Welch K: The principles of physiology of the cerebro­ spinal fluid in relation to hydrocephalus including normal pressure hydrocephalus. Adv Neurol 13:247332, 1975 Rubin RC, Henderson ES, Ommaya AK, Walker MD, Rail DP: The production of cerebrospinal fluid in man and its modification by acetazolamide. J Neuro­ surg 25:430-436, 1966 Mann JD, Butler AB, Rosenthal JE, Maffeo CJ, Johnson RN, Bass NH: Regulation of intracranial pressure in rat, dog, and man. Ann Neurol 3:156165, 1978 Ganong WF: Review of Medical Physiology. Elev­ enth edition. Los Altos, California, Lange Medical Publications, 1983, pp 462-476 Weiss MH, Wertman N: Modulation of CSF produc­ tion by alterations in cerebral perfusion pressure. Arch Neurol 35:527-529, 1978 Bering EA Jr, Sato O: Hydrocephalus: changes in formation and absorption ofcerebrospinal fluid within the cerebral ventricles. J Neurosurg 20:1050-1063, 1963 Levine JE, Povlishock JT, Becker DP: The morpho­ logical correlates of primate cerebrospinal fluid ab­ sorption. Brain Res 241:31-41,1982 Artru AA, Nugent M, Michenfelder JD: Closed recirculatory spinal subarachnoid perfusion for de­ termining CSF dynamics: reexamination of the model. J Neurosurg 56:368-372, 1982 Ekstedt J: CSF hydrodynamic studies in man. 1. Method of constant pressure CSF infusion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40:105-119, 1977 Ekstedt J: CSF hydrodynamic studies in man. 2. Normal hydrodynamic variables related to CSF pressure and flow. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 41:345-353, 1978 Heisey SR, Held D, Pappenheimer JR: Bulk flow and diffusion in the cerebrospinal fluid system of the goat. Am J Physiol 203:775-781, 1962 Miller JD, Garibi J, Pickard JD: Induced changes of cerebrospinal fluid volume: effects during continu­ ous monitoring of ventricular fluid pressure. Arch Neurol 28:265-269, 1973 Pappenheimer JR, Heisey SR, Jordan EF, Downer JD: Perfusion ofthe cerebral ventricular system in unanesthetized goats. Am J Physiol 203:763-774, 1962 Sklar FH, Elashvili I: The pressure-volume function of brain elasticity: physiological considerations and clinical applications. J Neurosurg 47:670-679,1977 Sklar FH, Long DM: Recirculatory spinal subarach­ noid perfusions in dogs: a method for determining CSF dynamics under non-steady state conditions. Neurosurgery 1:48-56, 1977 Sullivan HG, Allison JD, Goode JJ, Kingsbury TBIV, Lutz HA, Griffith RL: A critical evaluation of spinal recirculatory perfusion techniques for making rapid measurements of rates of CSF absorption and formation. In Hydrocephalus. Edited by Κ Shapiro. New York, Raven Press, 1984, pp 121-134

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

Mayo Clin P r o c , May 1990, Vol 65

33.

Sklar FH, Beyer CW Jr, Ramanathan M, Elashvili I, Cooper PR, Clark WK: Servo-controlled lumbar infusions: a clinical tool for the determination of CSF dynamics as a function of pressure. Neurosurgery 3:170-175, 1978 34. Gutterman P, Shenkin HA: Prognostic features in recovery from traumatic decerebration. J Neurosurg 32:330-335, 1970 35. Bradbury MWB, Westrop RJ: Lymphatics and the drainage of cerebrospinal fluid. In Hydrocephalus. Edited by Κ Shapiro. New York, Raven Press, 1984, pp 69-81 36. Miller JD, Butterworth JF, Gudeman SK, Faulkner JE, Choi SC, Selhorst JB, Harbison JW, Lutz HA, Young HF, Becker DP: Further experience in the management of severe head injury. J Neurosurg 54:289-299, 1981 37. Durward QJ, Amacher AL, Del Maestro RF, Sibbald WJ: Cerebral and cardiovascular responses to changes in head elevation in patients with intracra­ nial hypertension. J Neurosurg 59:938-944, 1983 38. Kenning JA, Toutant SM, Saunders RL: Upright patient positioning in the management of intracra­ nial hypertension. Surg Neurol 15:148-152,1981 39. Magnaes B: Body position and cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Part 1. Clinical studies on the effect of rapid postural changes. J Neurosurg 44:687-697, 1976 40. Ropper AH, O'Rourke D, Kennedy SK: Head posi­ tion, intracranial pressure, and compliance. Neurol­ ogy 32:1288-1291, 1982 41. Rosner MJ: Cerebral perfusion pressure: link be­ tween intracranial pressure and systemic circulation. In Cerebral Blood Flow: Physiologic and Clinical Aspects. Edited by JH Wood. New York, McGrawHill Book Company, 1987, pp 425-448 42. Rosner MJ, Coley IB: Cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure, and head elevation. J Neuro­ surg 65:636-641, 1986 43. Rosner MJ: The vasodilatory cascade and intracra­ nial pressure. In Intracranial Pressure VI. Edited by JD Miller, GM Teasdale, JO Rowan, SL Galbraith, AD Mendelow. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1986, pp 137-141 44. De Salles AAF, Muizelaar JP, Young HF: Hypergly­ cemia, cerebrospinal fluid lactic acidosis, and cere­ bral blood flow in severely head-injured patients. Neurosurgery 21:45-50, 1987 45. Kaufman HH, Bretaudiere J-P, Rowlands BJ, Stein DK, Bernstein DP, Wagner KA, Gildenberg PL: General metabolism in head injury. Neurosurgery 20:254-265, 1987 46. Hoff JT: Cerebral protection. J Neurosurg 65:579591, 1986 47. Rehncrona S, Rosen I, Siesjo BK: Brain lactic acido­ sis and ischemic cell damage. 1. Biochemistry and neurophysiology. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1:297311, 1981 48. Jennett B, Teasdale G, Fry J, Braakman R, Minderhoud J, Heiden J, Kurze T: Treatment for severe head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 43:289295, 1980

49.

705

Paulson OB, Olesen J, Christensen MS: Restoration of autoregulation ofcerebral blood flow by hypocapnia. Neurology 22:286-293, 1972 50. MacMillan V, Siesjo BK: The influence of hypocapnia upon intracellular pH and upon some carbohydrate substrates, amino acids and organic phosphates in the brain. J Neurochem 21:1283-1299, 1973 51. Siesjo BK: Cell damage in the brain: a speculative synthesis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1:155-185, 1981 52. McDowall DG: Monitoring the brain. Anesthesiol­ ogy 45:117-134, 1976 53. Kennealy JA, McLennan JE, Loudon RG, McLaurin RL: Hyperventilation-induced cerebral hypoxia. Am Rev Respir Dis 122:407-412, 1980 54. Siesjo BK: Brain Energy Metabolism. Chichester, England, John Wiley & Sons, 1978 55. Darby JM, Yonas H, Marion DW, Latchaw RE: Local "inverse steal" induced by hyperventilation in head injury. Neurosurgery 23:84-88, 1988 56. Obrist WD, Langfitt TW, Jaggi JL, Cruz J, Gennarelli TA: Cerebral blood flow and metabolism in comatose patients with acute head injury: relation­ ship to intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg 61:241-253, 1984 57. Neill WA, Hattenhauer M: Impairment of myocar­ dial Oj supply due to hyperventilation. Circulation 52:854-858, 1975 58. Fleischer AS, Patton JM, Tindall GT: Monitoring intraventricular pressure using an implanted reser­ voir in head injured patients. Surg Neurol 3:309311 1975 59. Cooper KR, Boswell PA, Choi SC: Safe use of PEEP in patients with severe head injury. J Neurosurg 63:552-555, 1985 60. Weed LH, McKibben PS: Pressure changes in the cerebro-spinal fluid following intravenous injection of solutions of various concentrations. Am J Physiol 48:512-530, 1919 61. Wise BL, Chater N: The value of hypertonic manni­ tol solution in decreasing brain mass and lowering cerebrospinal-fluid pressure. J Neurosurg 19:10381043, 1962 62. Rosner MJ, Coley IB: Cerebral perfusion pressure: a hemodynamic mechanism of mannitol and the postmannitol hemogram. Neurosurgery 21:147-156, 1987 63. Pollay M, Roberts PA, Fullenwider C, Stevens FA: The effect of mannitol and frusemide on the bloodbrain osmotic gradient and intracranial pressure. In Intracranial Pressure V. Edited by S Ishii, Η Nagai, Μ Brock. Beriin, Springer-Veriag, 1983, pp 734-736 64. Burke AM, Quest DO, Chien S, Cerri C: The effects of mannitol on blood viscosity. J Neurosurg 55:550553, 1981 65. Bruce DA, Langfitt TW, Miller JD, Schutz H, Vapalahti MP, Stanek A, Goldberg HI: Regional cerebral blood flow, intracranial pressure, and brain metabolism in comatose patients. J Neurosurg 38:131-144, 1973 66. Muizelaar JP, Lutz HA III, Becker DP: Effect of mannitol on ICP and CBF and correlation with

706

67.

68.

69. 70.

71.

72.

73.

74. 75.

76.

77. 78. 79.

80.

81.

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

pressure autoregulation in severely head-injured patients. J Neurosurg 61:700-706, 1984 Messeter K, Nordstrom C-H, Sundbarg G, Algotsson L, Ryding E: Cerebral hemodynamics in patients with acute severe head trauma. JNeurosurg 64:231237, 1986 Nordstrom C-H, Messeter K, Sundbarg G, Schalen W, Werner M, Ryding E: Cerebral blood flow, vasoreactivity, and oxygen consumption during bar­ biturate therapy in severe traumatic brain lesions. J Neurosurg 68:424-431, 1988 Miller JD, Leech P: Effects of mannitol and steroid therapy on intracranial volume-pressure relation­ ships in patients. J Neurosurg 42:274-281, 1975 Galicich JH, French LA: Use of dexamethasone in the treatment of cerebral edema resulting from brain tumors and brain surgery. Am Pract 12:169-174, 1961 Braakman R, Schouten HJA, Blaauw-van Dishoeck M, Minderhoud JM: Megadose steroids in severe head injury: results of a prospective double-blind clinical trial. J Neurosurg 58:326-330, 1983 Cooper PR, Moody S, Clark WK, Kirkpatrick J, Maravilla K, Gould AL, Drane W: Dexamethasone and severe head injury: a prospective double-blind study. J Neurosurg 51:307-316, 1979 Dearden NM, Gibson JS, McDowall DG, Gibson RM, Cameron MM: Effect of high-dose dexamethasone on outcome from severe head injury. J Neurosurg 64:81-88, 1986 Giannotta SL, Weiss MH, Apuzzo MLJ, Martin E: High dose glucocorticoids in the management of severe head injury. Neurosurgery 15:497-501,1984 Gudeman SK, Miller JD, Becker DP: Failure of highdose steroid therapy to influence intracranial pres­ sure in patients with severe head injury. J Neuro­ surg 51:301-306, 1979 Pitts LH, Katkis JV: Effect of megadose steroids on ICP in traumatic coma. In Intracranial Pressure IV. Edited by Κ Shulman, A Marmarou, JD Miller, DP Becker, GM Hochwald, Μ Brock. Berlin, SpringerVerlag, 1980, pp 638-642 Saul TG, Ducker TB: Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring and aggressive treatment on mortality in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 56:498-503, 1982 Saul TG, Ducker TB, Salcman M, Carro E: Steroids in severe head injury: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Neurosurg 54:596-600, 1981 Bracken MB, Collins WF, Freeman DF, Shepard MJ, Wagner FW, Silten RM, Hellenbrand KG, Ransohoff J, Hunt WE, Perot PL Jr, Grossman RG, Green BA, Eisenberg HM, Rifkinson N, Goodman JH, Meagher JN, Fischer B, Clifton GL, Flamm ES, Rawe SE: Efficacy of methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury. JAMA 251:45-52, 1984 Braughler JM, Hall ED: Current application of "high-dose" steroid therapy for CNS injury: a phar­ macological perspective. J Neurosurg 62:806-810, 1985 Jane JA, Rimel RW, Pobereskin LH, Tyson GW, Steward O, Gennarelli TA: Outcome and pathology of head injury. In Head Injury: Basic and Clinical

82.

83.

84.

85.

86. 87. 88.

89.

90. 91. 92.

93.

94. 95.

96.

97.

Aspects. Edited by RG Grossman, PL Gildenberg. New York, Raven Press, 1982, pp 229-237 Marshall LF, King J, Langfitt TW: The complica­ tions of high-dose corticosteroid therapy in neurosur­ gical patients: a prospective study. Ann Neurol 1:201-203, 1977 Gobiet W: The influence of various doses of dexa­ methasone on intracranial pressure in patients with severe head injury. In Dynamics of Brain Edema. Edited by HM Pappius, W Feindel. Berlin, SpringerVeriag, 1976, pp 351-356 Faupel G, Reulen HJ, Muller D, Schurmann K: Double-blind study on the effects of steroids on se­ vere closed head injury. In Dynamics of Brain Edema. Edited by HM Pappius, W Feindel. Berlin, SpringerVerlag, 1976, pp 337-343 Michenfelder JD, Milde JH, Sundt TM Jr: Cerebral protection by barbiturate anesthesia: use afl«r middle cerebral artery occlusion in Java monkeys. Arch Neurol 33:345-350, 1976 Miller JD: Barbiturates and raised intracranial pressure (editorial). Ann Neurol 6:189-193, 1979 Piatt JH Jr, SchiflfSJ: High dose barbiturate therapy in neurosurgery and intensive care. Neurosurgery 15:427-444, 1984 Ward JD, Becker DP, Miller JD, Choi SC, Marmarou A, Wood C, Newlon PG, Keenan R: Failure of prophy­ lactic barbiturate coma in the treatment of severe head injury. J Neurosurg 62:383-388, 1985 Marshall LF, Smith RW, Shapiro HM: The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries. Part I. The significance of intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosurg 50:20-25, 1979 Miller JD: ICP monitoring—current status and future directions. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 85:80-86, 1987 Rea GL, Rockswold GL: Barbiturate therapy in uncontrolled intracranial hypertension. Neuro­ surgery 12:401-404, 1983 Marshall LF, Shapiro HM, Rauscher A, Kaufman NM: Pentobarbital therapy for intracranial hyper­ tension in metabolic coma: Reye's syndrome. Crit Care Med 6:1-5, 1978 Venes JL, Shaywitz Β A, Spencer DD: Management of severe cerebral edema in the metabolic encepha­ lopathy of Reye-Johnson syndrome. J Neurosurg 48:903-915, 1978 Trauner DA: Barbiturate therapy in acute brain injury. J Pediatr 109:742-746, 1986 Klauber MR, Toutant SM, Marshall LF: A model for predicting delayed intracranial hypertension follow­ ing severe head injury. J Neurosurg 61:695-699, 1984 Teasdale E, Cardoso E, Galbraith S, Teasdale G: CT scan in severe diffuse head injury: physiological and clinical correlations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 47:600-603, 1984 Toutant SM, Klauber MR, Marshall LF, Toole BM, Bowers SA, Seelig JM, Varnell JB: Absent or com­ pressed basal cisterns on first CT scan: ominous predictors of outcome in severe head injury. J Neuro­ surg 61:691-694, 1984

INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

Mayo Clin Proc, May 1990, Vol 65

98.

99.

100.

101.

102. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. 108. 109.

110.

111.

Lundberg N, Troupp H, Lorin H: Continuous record­ ing of the ventricular-fluid pressure in patients with severe acute traumatic brain injury: a preliminary report. J Neurosurg 22:581-590, 1965 Marshall LF, Becker DP, Bowers SA, Cayard C, Eisenberg H, Gross CR, Grossman RG, Jane JA, Kunitz SC, Rimel R, Tabaddor K, Warren J: The National Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Parti. Design, purpose, goals, and results. J Neurosurg 59:276284, 1983 Narayan RK, Kishore PRS, Becker DP, Ward JD, Enas GG, Greenberg RP, Da Silva AD, Lipper MH, Choi SC, Mayhall CG, Lutz HA III, Young HF: Intracranial pressure: to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury. J Neurosurg 56:650-659, 1982 Smith HP, Kelly DL Jr, McWhorter JM, Armstrong D, Johnson R, Transou C, Howard G: Comparison of mannitol regimens in patients with severe head injury undergoing intracranial monitoring. J Neuro­ surg 65:820-824, 1986 Bering Ε A Jr: A simplified apparatus for constant ventricular drainage. J Neurosurg 8:450-452,1951 Rosner MJ, Becker DP: ICP monitoring: complica­ tions and associated factors. Clin Neurosurg 23:494519, 1976 Dearden NM, McDowall DG, Gibson RM: Assess­ ment of Leeds device for monitoring intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 60:123-129, 1984 Winn HR, Dacey RG, Jane JA: Intracranial sub­ arachnoid pressure recording: experience with 650 patients. Surg Neurol 8:41-47, 1977 Vries JK, Becker DP, Young HF: A subarachnoid screw for monitoring intracranial pressure. J Neuro­ surg 39:416-419, 1973 Allen R: Intracranial pressure: a review of clinical problems, measurement techniques and monitoring methods. J Med Eng Technol 10:299-320, 1986 Levin AB: The use of a fiberoptic intracranial pres­ sure monitor in clinical practice. Neurosurgery 1:266271, 1977 Hollingsworth-Fridlund P, Vos H, Daily EK: Use of fiber-optic pressure transducer for intracranial pres­ sure measurements: a preliminary report. Heart Lung 17:111-118, 1988 Narayan RK, Bray RS, Robertson CS, Gokaslan ZL, Grossman RG: Experience with a new fiberoptic device for intracranial pressure monitoring. Pre­ sented at the annual meeting ofthe American Asso­ ciation of Neurological Surgeons, Dallas, Texas, May 3 to 7, 1987 Ostrup RC, Luerssen TG, Marshall LF, Zomow MH: Continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure with a miniaturized fiberoptic device. J Neurosurg 67:206209, 1987

112.

707

Shields CB, McGraw CP, Garretson HD: Accurate intracranial pressure monitoring: technical note. Neurosurgery 14:592-593, 1984 113. Mendelow AD, Rowan JO, Murray L, Kerr AE: A clinical comparison of subdural screw pressure measurements with ventricular pressure. J Neuro­ surg 58:45-50, 1983 114. Miller JD, Bobo H, Kapp JP: Inaccurate pressure readings for subarachnoid bolts. Neurosurgery 19:253-255, 1986 115. North B, Reilly P: Comparison among three methods of intracranial pressure recording. Neurosurgery 18:730-732, 1986 116. Sundbarg G, Nordstrom C-H, Messeter K, Soderstrom S: A comparison of intraparenchymatous and intra­ ventricular pressure recording in clinical practice. J Neurosurg 67:841-845, 1987 117. McCleary EL, Cooper PR: Characteristics of a new ICP monitoring device. In Intracranial Pressure V. Edited by S Ishii, Η Nagai, Μ Brock. Berlin, Spring­ er-Veriag, 1983, pp 122-123 118. Powell MP, Crockard HA: Behavior of an extradural pressure monitor in clinical use: comparison of ex­ tradural with intraventricular pressure in patients with acute and chronically raised intracranial pres­ sure. J Neurosurg 63:745-749, 1985 119. Fasol P, Schedl R, Sebek W, Strickner M: Intra­ cranial pressure monitoring by fiber optic technique. In Intracranial Pressure V. Edited by S Ishii, Η Nagai, Μ Brock. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1983, pp 100-103 120. Aucoin PJ, Kotilainen HR, Gantz NM, Davidson R, Kellogg P, Stone B: Intracranial pressure monitors: epidemiologic study of risk factors and infections. Am J Med 80:369-376, 1986 121. Fleischer AS, Payne NS, Tindall GT: Continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure in severe closed head injury without mass lesions. Surg Neurol 6:3134, 1976 122. Mayhall CG, Archer NH, Lamb VA, Spadora AC, Baggett JW, Ward JD, Narayan RK: Ventriculostomy-related infections: a prospective epidemiologic study. Ν Engl J Med 310:553-559, 1984 123. Smith KA: Head trauma: comparison of infection rates for different methods of intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosci Nurs 19:310-314, 1987 124. Smith RW, Alksne JF: Infections complicating the use of external ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 44:567570, 1976 125. White RJ, Dakters JG, Yashon D, Albin MS: Tempo­ rary control of cerebrospinal fluid volume and pres­ sure by means of an externalized valve-drainage system. J Neurosurg 30:264-269, 1969 126. Wyler AR, Kelly WA: Use of antibiotics with external ventriculostomies. J Neurosurg 37:185-187, 1972