CHANGE IN HDL CHOLESTEROL AND RISK OF SUBSEQUENT CARDIOVASCULAR HOSPITALIZATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES

CHANGE IN HDL CHOLESTEROL AND RISK OF SUBSEQUENT CARDIOVASCULAR HOSPITALIZATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES

E496 JACC April 5, 2011 Volume 57, Issue 14 GENERAL CARDIOLOGY: HYPERTENSION, PREVENTION AND LIPIDS CHANGE IN HDL CHOLESTEROL AND RISK OF SUBSEQUENT ...

239KB Sizes 7 Downloads 130 Views

E496 JACC April 5, 2011 Volume 57, Issue 14

GENERAL CARDIOLOGY: HYPERTENSION, PREVENTION AND LIPIDS CHANGE IN HDL CHOLESTEROL AND RISK OF SUBSEQUENT CARDIOVASCULAR HOSPITALIZATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES ACC Oral Contributions Ernest N. Morial Convention Center, Room 244 Tuesday, April 05, 2011, 9:00 a.m.-9:15 a.m.

Session Title: Emerging Concepts in Evaluating Hyperlipidemia Abstract Category: 17. Risk Reduction and Rehabilitation Presentation Number: 920-7 Authors: Gregory A. Nichols, Suma Vupputuri, A. Gabriela Rosales, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Atlanta, GA Background: Although low high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), it remains unclear whether raising HDL-C can reduce CVD risk. We studied the association between changes in HDL-C and subsequent risk of CVD hospitalization among patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study of 30,067 members of the Kaiser Permanente Northwest and Southeast regions who had type 2 diabetes, and had two HDL-C measurements 6-24 months apart in 2001-2006. After calculating change in HDL-C, we used the date of the 2nd measurement as the index date and followed the patient cohort for up to 7.5 years (through 2009) to determine whether change in HDL-C was associated with subsequent CVD hospitalizations. We examined HDL-C change continuously, and also stratified patients into categories of change: increased HDL-C by 6.5mg/dl, decreased HDL-C by 6.5mg/dl, or remained within +/-6.4mg/dl. Cox regression analyses were adjusted for baseline HDL-C, demographic and clinical risk factors, comorbidities and use of pharmacologic agents. Results: Mean age was 60.9+12.6 years, 51% were men, and mean diabetes duration was 5.4+4.3 years. Over a mean follow-up of 55.8+23.8 months, 3717 (12.4%) patients experienced a CVD hospitalization. After multivariable adjustment, higher baseline HDL-C was significantly associated with lower CVD risk (HR 0.93 per 5mg/dl, 95% CI 0.92-0.95) and each 5mg/dl increase in HDL-C was associated with a 5% CVD risk reduction (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97). In the adjusted analyses of categorized HDL-C, a 6.5mg/dl HDL-C decline was associated with significantly increased CVD risk of 15% (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.27) while a 6.5mg/dl increase produced a statistically significant 10% CVD risk reduction (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98) relative to individuals with stable HDL-C. Conclusions: Change in HDL-C and baseline HDL-C were independently associated with risk of CVD hospitalization among patients with type 2 diabetes after accounting for other lipid levels and other known risk factors. These results suggest that therapies that raise HDL-C, or at least prevent its decline, may therefore reduce CVD morbidity.