Characteristics of Stellite 6 Deposited by Supersonic Laser Deposition Under Optimized Parameters

Characteristics of Stellite 6 Deposited by Supersonic Laser Deposition Under Optimized Parameters

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect JOURNAL OF IRON AND STEEL RESEARCH, INTERNATIONAL. 2013, 20(2). 52-57 Characteristics of Ste...

1002KB Sizes 0 Downloads 27 Views

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect JOURNAL OF IRON AND STEEL RESEARCH, INTERNATIONAL. 2013, 20(2). 52-57

Characteristics of Stellite 6 Deposited by Supersonic Laser Deposition Under Optimized Parameters LUO Fang 1 ' 2 ,

Lupoi Rocco 3 , Cockburn Andrew 4 , O'neill William 4 , YAO Jian-hua 2

Sparkes Martin 4 ,

( 1 . College of Zhijiang, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310024, Zhejiang, China;

2. College of

Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, Zhejiang, China;

3. Department

of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2 , Ireland;

4. Institute for

Manufacturing, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 O F S , U K ) Abstract: Stellite 6 powders were deposited on low carbon steel using SLD (supersonic laser deposition) under opti­ mized parameters. T h e structure, line scan of elements and porosity of coating were examined and analyzed using SEM (scanning electron microscope) , OM (optical microscope) and XRD (X-ray diffraction). T h e adhesion strength between coating and substrate was tested by P A T - A D H E S I O N / T E N S I L E and E900STM adhesive. The results showed the deposition characteristics of optimized coating with N2 at a pressure of 3. 0 M P a , a temperature of 450 *C and a laser power of 1. 5 kW were compared with those of Stellite 6 coating deposited by the H V O F (high velocity oxygen fuel). Keywords; Stellite 6; supersonic laser deposition; deposition characteristic ; H V O F

The performance of Stellite 6 (registered trademark of Kennametal Stellite) coating deposited using a vari­ ety of processes has been investigated by many re­ searchers in recent years due to excellent wear re­ sistance and corrosion protection over a wide range of temperatures. Conventional Stellite 6 coatings are often prepared by several processes, such as HVOF (high velocity oxygen fuel), plasma spray process and laser cladding. Stellite 6 coating deposited by HVOF processes is widely used in many industries to protect the components against erosion, corrosion r[l-9] However the coatings deposited by and HVOF have been found containing oxides and porosities'-10-11-'. The residual porosity in plasma spray Stel­ lite 6 coatings requires post-deposition treatments to im­ prove their properties1-12-163. Meanwhile, Stellite 6 clad­ ding shows defects, such as porosities, cracks, unac­ ceptable distortions on the piece, component dilution and oxide film on the surface layer1-17-20-1. The poros­ ity and dilution of Stellite 6 coating [21-24] have been

studied by many researchers. In the cold spray, there is no bulk particle melting and the feedstock properties can be retained [25-27] . However, the material is deposited using a high pressure, high velocity gas (helium) jet for the de­ formation and bonding of particles, therefore the cost is very high, and it is difficult to deposit brittle or hard materials ( e . g . ceramics) unless they are deposited and mixed with a ductile matrix'-28-'. In order to exploit the advantages of cold spray but at a reduced cost, to improve the property of coatings, and allow the deposition of harder materi­ als, the University of Cambridge129-30-1 has success­ fully combined a laser source with cold spray to pre­ pare higher density coating of Ti and Ti alloy. The technology is named SLD (supersonic laser deposi­ tion) and uses N2 as carrier gas. In particular, the function of the laser (IPG Fibre Laser, with a maxi­ mum power of 4 kW) is to provide additional energy to the deposition site. This allows harder materials

Foundation Item: Item Sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51271170) ; National International Technology Cooperation Project of China (KM JD2011010) ; Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China (Y4110594) ; Open Fund of Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Special Purpose Equipment and Advanced Manufacturing Technology of China (2011EM009) Biography:LUO Fang( 1966—), Female, Doctor, Associate Professor; E-mail: [email protected]; Received Date: September 15, 2011

Issue 2

Characteristics of Stellite 6 Deposited by Supersonic Laser Deposition Under Optimized Parameters

Table 1 Element contents of Stellite 6 powder (mass percent, %)

to be laid down while maintaining the key advanta­ ges offered by t h e solid state deposition r o u t e found in cold spray. Stellite 6 deposited onto low carbon steels by SLD is analysed under optimised p a r a m e t e r s . Depo­ sition characteristics of SLD-Stellite 6 are compared against those of Stellite 6 sprayed by H V O F method.

1

· 53 ·

Ni

Co

W

Cr

Balance

4.75

28.5

1.2

Mo

Fe

Si

Others

<2.0 <1.0 <2. 0 <2. 0

<1. 0

Experimental Procedure

Fig. 1 s h o w s t h a t the particles are uniform and spherical, with diameter of 35 — 50 μτη. Nominal com­ position of Stellite 6 powder is shown in T a b l e 1. Six overlapping tracks by S L D were deposited on a low carbon steel s u b s t r a t e in order to form a coating (Fig. 2 ) . T h e process parameters are shown in Table 2.

Fig. 2 Sample of SLD Table 2

Process parameter of SLD

N2

N2

Laser

Feeding velocity/

temperature/"C

pressure/MPa

power/kW

(mm-s-1)

500

3.0

1.5

10

2

Experimental Results and Discussion

2.1

1 10 Particle size/μιη

1000

Fig. 1 Stellite 6 particles and particle size distribution

(a) Deposition topography of SLDi

Fig. 3

Analysis of surface topography and cross section T h e surface t o p o g r a p h y of Stellite 6 is presen­ ted in Fig. 3. Fig. 3 ( a ) s h o w s coating topography of Stellite 6 deposited by S L D ; it shows craters with fluctuation and no melting topography; Fig. 3 (b) shows melting topography of Stellite 6 deposited by H V O F . Fig. 4 s h o w s t h a t the s t r u c t u r e of the s u b s t r a t e is ferrite ( F ) and pearlite ( P ) . As for SLD, during the hard particles impact on the relatively hot substrate, the plastic deformation of the substrate results in recrystallisation of the interface area close to the substrate, thereby improving t h e interface s u b s t r a t e s hardness.

( b ) Deposition topography of H V O F .

Surface topography of Stellite 6

• 54 ·

Journal of Iron and Steel Research, International

Fig. 4

Vol. 20

Structure of substrate and interface zone

T h e cross section in Fig. 5 ( a ) , etched by aqua regia, s h o w s many blisters on the s u b s t r a t e due to corrosion. T h i s is because t h a t F e of s u b s t r a t e r e ­ acts with hydrochloric acid and nitric acid, and gen­ erates gas ( s u c h as H 2 and N z ) . T h e coating of Fig. 5 ( a ) is magnified, and the s t r u c t u r e after polis­ hing and etching is shown in Fig. 5 ( b ) . The deforma­ tion appears to be greater on the top surface of each particle, indicating t h a t cold, hard particles are e m ­ bedding themselves into a h e a t e d , softened s u b s t r a t e during deposition, and the dendrites appear close re­

ticulation distribution. T h e spherical particles appear ra­ diant dendrites from core of particle to boundary [ a s s h o w n in a r r o w of Fig. 5 ( b ) and Fig. 6 ( a ) ] . T h e black cross m a r k ( p o i n t of m e a s u r e m e n t ) is magnified and s h o w n in Fig. 5 ( c ) . It can be found that t h e boundary of reticulation is composed of many white grains along the boundary. T a b l e 3 shows chemical composition at m a r k s ( black cross m a r k and white triangle m a r k ) . T h e results show content of carbon is high com­ paring with contents of Stellite 6 powder, possibly form­

imi μιη

(a) Etched cross section;

( b) Structure of coating ; ( c) Magnification of cross mark ( SLD) i Fig. 5 Analysis of cross section

(d) Distances of line scan.

Issue 2

Characteristics of Stellite 6 Deposited by Supersonic Laser Deposition Under Optimized Parameters

· 55 ·

(a) Optical micrograph of Stellite 6 coating (SLD) ; (b) SEM micrograph of Stellite 6 coating deposited by SLD; (c) Porosity of Stellite 6 coating deposited by SLD; (d) Porosity of Stellite 6 deposited by HVOF. Fig. 6 Optical micrograph and porosity of Stellite 6 coating Table 3

Element content of mark

Black cross mark White triangle mark

C

Cr

Co

W

5.41 7.23

31.23 33.53

60.96 58.53

2.40 0.71

ing carbide resulting in high content of carbon. Fig. 5 (d) and Fig. 7 shows that the distances of line scan from substrate to coating in cross-section of SLD, and the length of test is 560 μπι. It appears that the elements of coating have hardly diluted, and initial composition is still retained ^

75

Coating

Substratey

65 »

'55

i

— '

\

■ C ♦ Co • Si « W ACr »Mn T Fe · Ni

45 35

\ 1

^25

S

g 15

-r-î-T-J

£= ^



1

200 400 Distance from surface/μιη

600

Fig. 7 Change of element from coating to substrate

comparing with composition of powder. This proves SLD results in no bulk particle melting. 2. 2

Porosity and adhesion strength This structure and porosity of coating were measured optically and reported in Fig. 6. The sur­ face of coating shows sphere particles with radiant dendrite distribution clearly. Fig. 6 ( a ) shows the typical hypo-eutectic structure consisting of complex wear resistant carbides dispersed in Co matrix. Po­ rosity is an important parameter for evaluation of coating quality, and measured to be of 0. 2% for SLD [Fig. 6 ( c ) ] , which is considerably lower than porosity of 2% - 3 % for HVOF [31] [Fig. 6 ( d ) ] counterpart. The phase structure of the coating by SLD was analyzed and it is shown in Fig. 8. One of the key characteristics of any coating material is its bonding ability or adhesion to other materials. Without sufficient· adhesion, a coating will fail. Therefore, adhesion strength objectively and accurately during research and quality control are vital. The adhesion strength between coating and sub­ strate is tested by PAT-ADHESION/TENSILE, using E900STM adhesive. Test diameter is 6 mm (Fig. 9). The

J o u r n a l of I r o n a n d S t e e l R e s e a r c h ,

• 56 ·

2 500

results in T a b l e 4 show t h a t t h e average adhesion s t r e n g t h is 6 1 . 8 M P a . T h e d a t u m of t h e third cir­ cle m a r k is ignored due to t h e a p p r o a c h edge of specimen.

Cr7C,T Co

2 000h .1500

I

CrrCs

Co

I looo &

W2C 500 0

>■-

20

30

CrrC, Co

CrjCa Co

\ K ., . , , A..-, .JUÂ, 50

Vol. 20

International

20/(°)

70

90

110

Fig. 8 XRD of Stellite 6 deposited by SLD

Adhesion s t r e n g t h of Stellite 6 coating deposi­ ted by H V O F has not been reported by any paper. Adhesion s t r e n g t h of other alloy deposited on the steel by H V O F is s h o w n in Fig. 10. It can be seen t h a t adhesion s t r e n g t h of coating deposited by H V O F is 7 5 - 9 8 M P a [ F i g . 10 ( a ) [ 3 2 ] and ( b ) [ 3 3 ] ] because t h e t e m p e r a t u r e of H V O F is enough to melt metal which results in metallurgy b o n d , however with this m e t h o d phase transformations are likely to o c c u r , i. e. poor coating properties and higher level of porosity. Table 4

Fig. 9 Sample of pull-off adhesion testing

Element content of mark

No.

1

2

Adhesion s t r e n g t h / M P a

62.4

3 61.2

4.8

(W Substrate/NiCr Subsrrate/Ni/NiCr Substrate/WC-Co Substrate/Ni/WC-Co Substrate/NiCr/WC-Co

·- ->

Subsöate/Ni/NiCr/WC-Co

2

3 4 Sample number

(a) 8 0 % C r 3 C z / 2 0 % N i - C r coatings;

2 000

4000 6000 Average/psi

8000

10000

( b ) Tensile bond strength of coatings.

Fig. 10 Adhesion strength by HVOF

3

sistance of H V O F WC-Co and TiC/Ni-Ti Coatings Sprayed on

Conclusions

1) T h e s t r u c t u r e of deposition coating is typical hypo-eutectic s t r u c t u r e consisting of complex wear resistant carbides dispersed in b a s e , and dilution of elements hardly exists. 2) T h e porosity of coating deposited by S L D is 0 . 2 % , and it is lower than coating porosity of 2 % — 3 % deposited by H V O F . 3) Adhesion s t r e n g t h b e t w e e n coating deposi­ ted by SLD and s u b s t r a t e is 6 1 . 8 M P a .

Commercial Steel [ ] ] . Surface Engineering, 1998, 14: 133. [3]

Collazo A , Novo X R , Perez C. Corrosion Behavior of Cermet Coatings in Artificial Seawater [ J ] ,

Electrochimica

Acta,

1999, 4 4 : 4289. [4]

Adachi Tani M , Nakahira A , Takatani*Y. Aqueous Corrosion Behaviour of Thermally Sprayed Coatings for Steel Substrate [ C ] // Cristopher C. Thermal Spray Conference.

Montreal:

ASM International, 2000: 1025. [5]

Gu P , Arsenault B , Beaudoin J J , et al. Polarization Resist­ ance of Stainless Steel-Coated Rebars [ J ] . Cement and Con­ crete Research, 1998, 2 8 ( 3 ) : 321.

[6]

Sturgeon A J , Buxton D C. T h e Electrochemical Corrosion Be­ havior of H V O F Sprayed Coatings [ C ] / / B a i l R Marple, Mar­ garet M Hyland, Yuk-Chiu Lau. Thermal Spray: Surface En­

References:

gineering via Applied Research Proceedings of International [1]

Sidhu T S, Agrawal R D , Prakash S. H o t Corrosion of Some

Thermal Spray Conference.

Superalloys and Role of High-Velocity Oxy-Fuel Spray Coat­

2000: 1011.

ings—A Review [ J ] . Surface and Coatings Technology, 2005, [2]

[7]

Montreal: ASM International,

Harvey D , Lunder O , Henriksen R. T h e Development of Cor­

198; 441.

rosion Resistant Coatings by H V O F Spraying [ C ] // Bail R

Guilemany J M , Fernandez J , Paco J M , et al. Corrosion Re­

Marple, Margaret M Hyland, Yuk-Chiu Lau. Thermal Spray:

Issue 2

C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of S t e l l i t e 6 D e p o s i t e d b y S u p e r s o n i c L a s e r D e p o s i t i o n U n d e r O p t i m i z e d P a r a m e t e r s

Surface Engineering via Applied Research Proceedings of Inter­ national Thermal Spray Conference. Montreal: ASM Interna­ [8]

[10]

Coatings Technology, 2010, 204: 1983. [21]

Particle Size on the Inter-Track Porosity in Multi-Track Clad­

Benea Lidia» Iordache Viorel-Eugen, Wenger François, et al.

ding [ J ] . Surface and Coatings Technology, 2006, 2 0 1 : 998. [22]

rosity Development During Thermal Spraying [ J ] ,

of University " D U N Ä R E A DE JOS " of Galati, 2005, 8: 35.

and Coatings Technology, 1994, 70: 57.

Hazoor Singh Sidhu, Buta Singh Sidhu, Prakash S. Solid Par­

[23]

[ J ] . Surface and Coatings Technology, 2007, 2 0 2 : 232.

Spray Coatings and Correlation With Small Angle Neutron Scattering [ J ] . Surface and Coatings Technology, 2004, 187:

Hazoor Singh Sidhua, Buta Singh Sidhub, Parkash S. Char­

6. [24]

of Porosity in Plasma Sprayed MgO-ZrÛ2 Coatings for an In­

gy, 2010, 2 ( 2 ) : 133.

ternal Combustion Diesel Engine [ J ] , Materials Science and Engineering, 2004, 379 A : 11.

Buta Singh Sidhu, Puri D , Prakash S. Mechanical and Metal­ [25]

Manufacturing

cation [ J ] . International Journal of Machine Tools and Manu­ [26]

Conditions on the Properties and Annealing Behavior of Cold-

nology, 1 9 9 1 , 4 9 : 62.

Sprayed Copper [ J ] . Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2006, 1 5 ( 2 ) : 255.

Aihua W , Beidi Z , Zengyi T , et al. Thermal-Shock Behav­ [27]

ings Technology, 1993, 5 7 , 169.

T E M Analysis [ J ] . Surface and Coatings Technology,

Tjong S C , Ku J S, Ho N J. Corrosion Behaviour of Laser

2010, 204: 2353. [28]

Andrew Siao Ming A n g , Christopher C Berndt, Philip

Phase Steel [ J ] . Material Science and Technology, 1997, 1 3 :

Cheang. Deposition Effects of WC Particle Size on Cold

56.

Sprayed WC-Co Coatings [ J ] . Surface and Coatings Tech­

Wielage B , Hofmann U , Steinhauser S, e t a l . Improving

nology, 2 0 1 1 , 2 0 5 : 3260. [29]

[ J ] . Surface and Coatings Technology, 2009, 2 0 3 : 2851. [30]

5 3 : 30. [31]

[ J ] . Surface and Coatings Technology, 2007, 202: 232.

Pulsed Nd: YAG Laser Cladding of Stellite 6 on Stainless Surface and Coatings Technology, 2005, 194:

[32]

225.

Nyga Êrds C M , White K W , Ravi-Chandar K. Strength of H V O F Coating-Substrate Interfaces [ J ] . Thin Solid Films,

Goswami G L , Kumar Santosh, Galun R , et al. Laser Clad­ ding of Nickel Based Hardfacing Materials as an Alternative of

Hazoor Singh Sidhu, Buta Singh Sidhu, Prakash S. Solid Par­ ticle Erosion of H V O F Sprayed NiCr and Stellite-6 Coatings

Sun S, Durandet Y , Brandt M. Parametric Investigation of Steel [ J ] .

Cockburn Andrew, Bray M a t t h e w , O'Neill William. The La­ ser-Assisted Cold Spray Process [ J ] . T h e Laser U s e r , 2008,

Methods [ J ] . W e a r , 1998, 214: 30. So H , Chen C T , Chen Y A. Wear Behaviours of Laser-Clad Stellite Alloy 6 [ J ] . W e a r , 1996, 192= 78.

Bray M a t t h e w , Cockburn Andrew, O'Neill William. The La­ ser-Assisted Cold Spray Process and Deposit Characterization

Et.^i-.ion L C, Westergard R , Wiklund U , et al. Cohesion in Plasma-Sprayed Coatings: A Comparison Between Evaluation

[20]

Heli Koivuluoto, Mari Honkanen, Petri Vuoristo. ColdSprayed Copper and Tantalum Coatings Detailed FESEM and

Surface Engineering, 1998, 1 4 ( 2 ) : 136.

[19]

Calla E , McCartney D G , Shipway P H. Effect of Deposition

Temperature Applications [ J ] . Surface and Coatings Tech­

V r oar and Corrosion Resistance of Thermal Sprayed Coatings

[18]

:

facture, 2007, 4 7 : 627.

Ananthapadmanabhan P V , Sreekumar K P , Muraleedharan

Melted Plasma Sprayed Coatings on 1 2 % Chromium Dual

[17]

A Non-Thermal Approach to Freeform Fabri­

20Cr and Stellite-6 Coatings [ J ] , Journal of Materials P r o ­

Alloy Influenced by Laser Remelting [ J ] , Surface and Coat­

[16]

Pattison J , Celotto S, Morgan R , et al. Cold Gas Dynamic

cessing Technology, 2005, 159: 347.

iour of Plasma-Sprayed Al2 0 3 - 1 3 w t / / o T i 0 2 Coatings on Al-Si

[15]

Erdal Celik, Ozkan Sarikay. T h e Effect on Residual Stresses

ternational Journal of Engineering and Information Technolo­

K V , et al. Plasma-Sprayed Composite Coatings for High

[14]

Deshpande S, Kulkarni A , Sampath S, et al. Application of Image Analysis for Characterization of Porosity in Thermal

lurgical Properties of Plasma Sprayed and Laser Remelted Ni-

[13]

Surface

ticle Erosion of H V O F Sprayed NiCr and Stellite-6 Coatings

Coatings on the Boiler Steels Using LPG as Fuel Gas [ J ] . In­

[12]

Sobolev V V , Guilemany J M. Analysis of Coating Gas Po­

4—A Comparison in L1OH-H3BO3 Solutions [ J ] . T h e Annals

acteristic Parameters of H V O F Sprayed NiCr and Stellite-6

[11]

Sun S, Brandt M , Harris J , et al. T h e Influence of Stellite 6

tional, 2000: 991. Tribo-Corrosion Mechanism Study of Stellite-6 and Zircaloy-

[9]

· 57 ·

1998, 332: 185. [33]

Tong Yul C h o , Jae Hong Yoon, Jae Young Cho, et al. Sur­

Stellite [ J ] . B A R C , Newsletter, 2003, 249.- 65.

face Properties and Tensile Bond Strength of H V O F Thermal

Suarez A , Amado J M , Tobara M J , et al. Study of Residual

Spray Coatings of WC-Co Powder Onto the Surface of 420J2

Stresses Generated Inside Laser Cladded Plates Using F E M

Steel and the Bond Coats of N i , NiCr, Sind Ni/NiCr [ J ] . Sur­

and Diffraction of Synchrotron Radiation [ J ] . Surface and

face and Coatings Technology, 2009, 2 0 3 : 3250.